準備はいい。ゾーンに入っているよ、君は。
I'm ready when you are, man. I'm in the zone. I'm in the zone, man. [laughter]
How Brad Jacobs Built 8 Billion-Dollar Companies
英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。
準備はいい。ゾーンに入っているよ、君は。
I'm ready when you are, man. I'm in the zone. I'm in the zone, man. [laughter]
いつでもどうぞ。ゾーンにいる。
We're right. I hope we start with this. I love your energy. This is what I always tell people when, you know, I did the episode on your book, right? And since then, thousands, and this is not an exaggeration. Thousands of people have sent me messages, but what I try to explain to people, they're like, "Well, what's like so different about Brad?" I was like, "First of all, how long do you have? Second of all, he's got the best energy and the most energy of any person I've ever been around. So like I really appreciate you taking the time and agreeing to do this. One of my favorite things is your affinity and relationship that you had. You had a bunch of mentors but one of your most important one that you mentioned I think four times in the book is Lewig Jesselson. You have a list of maxims in the very beginning of the book that you learned from other people. Uh the maxim that you listed for him was get the major trend right. So if you could just talk about your relationship with him and what he meant to you. I think that's a perfect place to start.
ここから始めたい。君のエネルギーが本当に好きだ。本のエピソードを出してから、大げさではなく何千通ものメッセージが来た。「ブラッドの何がそんなに違うの?」と聞かれたら、まず「どれくらい時間がある?」と返す。そのうえで言うのは、僕が会った誰よりもエネルギーが強く、量も多い、ということだ。時間を割いてくれてありがとう。
本のなかで何度も出てくるメンターがいる。何人かメンターはいたが、特に大事な一人で、本に四回くらい出てくるのが Ludwig Jesselson だ。巻頭のマキシム集で、彼から学んだ一文は「大きなトレンドを正しく取れ(Get the major trend right)」。関係と、彼が君にとって何だったかを話してくれないか。ここから始めるのがいちばんいいと思う。
He meant a lot. So Mr. Jess, I never called him litig. Mr. Jess, he was, you know, significantly older than me and much more accomplished than me, so I showed him respect, but call him Mr. Jess.
とても大きかった。だから Mr. Jess と呼んでいた。Ludwig とは一度も呼ばなかった。年も実績もずっと上で、敬意を込めて Mr. Jess だ。
特別な人だった。深い。原則で生き、人生を満杯に生きた人だ。宗教はあったが、極端というより、ユダヤ教の道徳——やるべきこと・やってはいけないこと、倫理的行動、誠実さ、正直さ——を人生と事業の芯にしていた。それが個人生活の芯でも、ビジネスの芯でもあった。
関係性。深い関係、長期の関係、正直な関係、何度でも戻ってこれる関係。あるときは片方にレバレッジがあり、あるときは逆でも、つけこまない。長期だ。彼には何十もの深い原則があって、そのひとつが今言ったトレンドだ。世界最大級の商品取引会社 Philipp Brothers を率いたトレーダーとして、「長期トレンドを正しく取れ」と言い続けた。いろいろ正しくても、長期トレンドを外したら困ることになる。
文脈が要る。何が起きているか、何が起きたか、いま何が起きているか、これから起こりそうな未来の状態は何か、それぞれの確率はどれくらいか。そのうえでリスク管理だ。
Mr. Jess, uh, was a special guy. This was someone who was deep, very profound, and had lived life fully and by principles. And he was a religious guy, but I wouldn't say he was like ultra religious. He was more taking the the morality of Judaism, the dos and don'ts and ethical behavior and honesty and so forth. And that became the core of his life. That became the core of his personal life and his business life. Relationships, deep relationships, long-term relationships, honest relationships, relationships you can keep coming back to. And sometimes one person has the leverage, sometimes the other person has the leverage. Doesn't matter. You don't take advantage of that. It's long-term relationships. And he had he had about a few dozen deep principles and and one of them is one one you just mentioned which is because he was a trader
逆も同じだ。トレンドを外したら、千のことを正しくやっても負ける。アルファも価値も出ない。
ran the largest commodity trading firm in the world for brothers. It was you got to get the long-term trend right. You can get a lot of stuff right.
そのとおりだ。大きなトレンドを外したら、いくら正しくても負ける——それが彼の大きな教えだった。
Yeah.
もうひとつ好きなのは、君が23歳の頃、世界でもっとも成功した一人と頻繁にランチしていて、それでもストレスや問題を吐き出せたことだ。彼は辛抱強く聞いて、「ああ、ビジネスは問題だ」と返す。
ヘンリー・カイザー——フーバーダムや戦時のリバティ船、百社を起こした人で、チャーリー・マンガーのお気に入りの創業者の一人——の伝記にも「問題はワークフローに乗った機会だ」とある。本に書いたランチの話と、ほぼ同じ助言だ。
But if you don't get the long-term trend right you're kind of in trouble. So you got to you got to figure that one out. You got to see what what's going on here. You need context. You need to see what's happening, what did happen, what is happening, and what will likely happen in the future and what are the different future states that could happen and what's the probabilities for each one of those. And then you have your risk management. So yeah, the converse of that is if you get the major trend wrong, you can do a thousand things right, you're still going to lose. You're not going to create alpha. You're not going to create value there. So yeah, that that was a big lesson from him.
本にも書いたが、あるランチで少し沈んでいた。何が起きたか、この問題だ、あの問題だ、と話した。彼は言った。「こんなことで落ち込むなら、ビジネスの世界にいちゃだめだ。これこそ、起き上がるべきものだ」。
問題、課題、障害——それに向き合い、取り除くことで金を稼ぎ、価値を作る。素晴らしい生き方でもある。まず金になる。ビジネスの世界では、常に飛来ミサイルがある。従業員、競合、規制——いいことも多いが、そのあいだに顔面へのパンチが来る。それで殴られていたら成功しないし、幸せにもなれない。
不機嫌な億万長者を見たことがあるだろう。金の意味は何だ? 僕は、いつもしかめっ面で怒って落ち込んでいる億万長者にはなりたくない。正しい心の状態で、短い人生を過ごすことの方がよほど大事だ。合理的に幸せでいればいい。24時間7日エクスタシーである必要はない。だいたい幸せ、でいい。
The other thing that I love is you were 23 years old. you're having lunch with him on a very frequent basis. Like you just said, he's much older. He's one of the most successful people in the world. He's taking an interest in you and yet you were still comfortable to like unload your like your stresses and your problems. And he would sit there patiently listening and then I love his response where he's just like, "Yeah, business is problems." Like one of I think most important lessons is like problems. There's a line from Henry Kaiser who was you know in his day was as famous as like say like an Elon is today or you're becoming and you know he started a hundred different companies. He built the Hoover Dam. Uh he built liberty ships for the Allies in World War II. And I read a bunch of biographies on him because he was uh Charlie one of Charlie Mer's favorite founders. And he said a line in the biography that's in multiple life stories about him that problems are just opportunities and workflows. And so I read the the your recounting in your book of your some of your lunches with uh Mr. Justin. It's like oh he had the exact he essentially gave you the same advice.
サム・ゼルは存命中に会った?
Yeah. So in the book I talked about a specific episode when I was having lunch with him and I was kind of down and glum and he said what's going on and I was talking about this problem and this thing I was just kind of down you know and he said well
何度も会った。いい人だった。
don't stay in the business world if you're going to get down on this stuff these are the things you should get up from. Yeah we have problems we have challenges you have obstacles by addressing those that's how you make money. You make money. So the more problems you have, as long as you can solve them, as long as you figure out how to address them and remove the the problem, that's how you're creating value. That's a a wonderful way to go through life. Number one, it's a great way to make money because you're not always down because you always have incoming missiles when you're in the business world. You have problems with
彼とも似た話をした。二時間の濃いランチで、「金持ちをみんな知っているが、不幸な奴がどれだけ多いか信じられない。やるな。俺は毎朝起きて……」と言われた。君の本でも何度も「問題は機会だ」とある。ベゾスの伝記『The Everything Store』でも、事業の問題を聞くと興奮すると書かれている。
with employees, with competitors, with regular. I mean, just all day long you have incoming missiles. You have great stuff, too, but in between that is punches to the face. And if you're gonna get beaten up by that, you're not gonna you're not gonna be successful. And secondly, you're not gonna be happy. So you're gonna go through life like glum. You see, sometimes you see these like multi-billionaire guys and they always look like this. What's the point of all the money? [laughter] Seriously. So I I I would not be want to be one of these zillion guys who's like frowning all the time like and upset and angry and depressed. That's much more important to me to be in the right frame of mind and to go through the short time we have in life.
ああ、株主価値が上がる問題だ、と捉え、避けるのではなく抱きしめろ、と。
Happy, reasonably happy. I don't have a perfectionist standard. I have to be like in ecstasy and bliss 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, but generally happy.
(※ここで Ramp 等のスポンサー読み上げあり。本文では省略)
君の本のローンチパーティは衝撃だった。スーツを着ていなかったのは僕だけだった(今日は直した)。そこにいた人はほぼ「ブラッドとは三〇年の付き合い」で、年金基金に大金を作ってもらった、という話ばかりだった。長期の評判がすごい。どう維持してきた? なぜ大事だ? バフェットがソロモン・ブラザーズで言った「金は失ってもいい。評判を一片でも失ったら、容赦なく対処する」にも通じる。
Did you ever meet Samzel when he was alive?
評判は極めて大事だ。個人ブランドが、人と仕事をするかしないかを決める。毎日オフィスで何かをするたび、ブランドを上げるか下げている。誠実さ、正直さ、頼りになること、安定——人が当てにできること——をブランドに映さなければならない。
これも Mr. Jess に戻る。Philipp Brothers の頃はメールも、まだファクスも本格的ではなく、テレックス中心で、確認に数日かかった。電話の握手だけで何億ドルもの取引ができた。そのあいだに油や銅の価格が跳ねても、ディールはディールだ。そうでなければシステムが壊れる。信頼と、言ったことを守ることが、すべてだった。
I did. Yeah, I'm sure many times.
本のローンチ以降、 quant や年金の人から聞いた話も同じだった。「ブラッドは約束を守る」「長期で信頼できる」。若い起業家に一つだけ言うなら、評判とトレンドのどちらを先に取れと言う?
Okay. So, he great guy.
両方だ。トレンドを外したら勝負にならない。評判を壊したら、次のディールも次の人材も来ない。毎日、ブランドを上げるか下げるかしかない。中立はない。
He he had the same thing. I was lucky enough to have a two-hour very intense lunch with him. He said the same very similar thing to you. He's like, I know all the rich guys. He's like, you wouldn't believe how many are miserable. He's like, "Don't do that." He's like, "I wake up every single day. You guys have a lot of similarity where like I'll spend time with you." You know, the very first time I met you when I went to your book launch party, right? I just remember like, "Oh, this guy's got crazy energy." And I'd already read your book by then, but something that you talk about over and over again in your book is like problems are just opportunities. It reminded me of there's this line from um in Jeff Bezos's he's there's several books on him, but one of his main biographies is this book called The Everything Story. Everything store. And they said that Jeff, you would tell him problems about his business and he would get excited. Yeah.
その助言を受けたのは何歳の頃? すぐ長期最適化を始めた?
Cuz he's like, "Oh," and he talks about the shareholders. He's like, "Oh, this is like these are problems. If I solve these problems, this is going to increase the enterprise value of the company that I'm building. These are actually good things to identify and embrace instead of avoid." One of the most important things that I learned from Brad Jacobs is the importance of working with the smartest and most talented people you can. Brad says, "The most important thing that a CEO does is recruit superlative people." Brad recruits the smartest people he can find and says there's no substitute for smarts. Steve Jobs believed that this was important too. Steve said, "I think that I've consistently figured out who the really smart people were to hang around with. You must find extraordinary people. The key observation is that in most things in life, the dynamic range between average quality and the best quality is at most 2:1. But in the field that I was interested in, I noticed that the dynamic range between what an average person could accomplish and what the best person could accomplish was 50 or 100 to one. You need to build a team that pursues the A+ players. That is the end of the Steve Jobs quote. And that is exactly what RAMP has done. Ramp has the most talented technical team in their industry. Becoming an engineer at RAMP is nearly impossible. In the last 12 months, they hired only 23% of the people that applied. That means when you use RAMP, you now have top tier technical talent and some of the best AI engineers working on your behalf 24/7 to automate and improve all of your business's financial operations. And they do this on a single platform. That means the longer they use RAM, the more efficient your company becomes. This is important because as Sam Walton said in his autobiography, you can make a lot of different mistakes and still recover if you run an efficient operation or you can be brilliant and still go out of business if you're too inefficient. Ramp helps you run an efficient organization. From a customer's perspective, what does a team of A+ players sound like? It sounds like this customer review that I read, which said, "Ramp is like having a teammate who you never need to check in on because they have it handled." go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time and money today. That is ramp.com. I do have a question on your long-term reputation. Okay, so there's this line. Do you remember when Buffett got uh in all that trouble with uh with Solomon Brothers? And he's like, "Listen, you can lose money. That's fine. But you lose a shred of reputation.
年齢が上がるほど、長期を最適化する。若い頃は野心が強く「いま」にいる。成熟すると文脈が増える。人生とは、だいたい文脈を増やすこと——物事を他との比例で見ること——だと思う。
I'll be absolutely ruthless." I it was a very jarring experience for me at your book launch party because first of all I was the only one that didn't show up in a suit. [laughter] So I rectified that today right and then everybody else was just like you know I've known Brad for three decades like how basically everybody there was like how do you know Brad? It's like you know he he I was an investor of his you know he made all this money for this pension fund that we run and everything else and like the stories that I've heard at the party and then since I released the episode is just like you have a fantastic long-term reputation. Do you have any advice on how you were able to maintain that and how important it was for other people to do the same thing?
もう少し。
Reputation is really important. Your your personal brand is extremely important because based on that, people are going to want to do business with you or they're going to want to not do business with you. So, every day you're in the office and doing stuff, you're either raising your brand or you're lowering your brand. And that's the main thing you got to work on. You got to make sure that your brand reflects integrity and honesty and dependability and stability and people can count on you. This goes back to Mr. Jess. So, Philip Brothers, this is before email. This is before actually it was even before faxes. It was more Twixes and texes. So, which took a few days to go through when they went through go through. So, you could do a deal worth hundreds of millions of dollars on a handshake on a phone call. There's no written confirmation of that for like days. In the meantime, maybe the price of whatever you were trading, oil or copper had gone up a lot.
ポッドキャストの外でも話したけど、瞑想をやっている。空間の見方を変える。地球から太陽、太陽系、銀河、銀河団、宇宙、多元宇宙まで一気に広げ、また分子・原子・陽子・核・弦まで畳み込む。アコーディオンみたいに心を巨大にし、極小にする。
時間も同じで、数十年の自分の人生から、世紀、千年、138億年前のビッグバンまでさかのぼり、未来へも伸ばす。その時空の並置が、僕には文脈と謙虚さ、意味、目的、理解、知恵をくれる。自分は巨大な何かのなかの小さな点だが、同時にその一部でもある。高揚し、動機づけられる。我々はみんな、この巨大な何かの一部だ。
You still had to have a deal. Otherwise, you know, the whole system doesn't work. So, dependability is so so trust is so so important to do.
君は嫌うかもしれないが、僕は珍しい人を研究する仕事をしている。Founders で扱うのは、仕事がうまくいきすぎて誰かが伝記を書いた人たちだ。内面の駆動はしばしばネガティブ——不安、貧困、家族との軋轢——だと、アポロ・オーノ(冬季五輪歴代最多メダリスト級のアメリカ選手)に「みんなそうなのか」と聞かれた。数メートル先に君がいて、「あれがブラッド・ジェイコブズだ。彼はそれじゃない」と言った。
マイアミの共通の友人リックの誕生日で会ったときの話だ。外から見ると、問題に揺さぶられない。「ビジネスは問題だ。来る。ここで何をしていると思う?」——火に走る側だ。八つのビリオンダラー企業は偶然ではできない。大きなディールのときの内面の独り言は? Mr. Jess の「問題は友だ」に戻るのか?
How old were you when you when he gave you that advice? Did you immediately start playing applying it? So, you you were optimizing for the long term even when you were that young.
問題をただ我慢するな。抱きしめろ。ハグしろ。問題が成功の道だ。火から逃げるな、火に走れ。勇敢であれ。アポロや多くの伝記の人は、ネガティブ、トラウマ、ストレス、不安、恐怖を燃料にして速く走る。僕はそうじゃない。
Yeah. I think as you get older, you optimize long term more. I think I think when you're young, you're just so ambitious and you want to get stuff done. you're in the now. When as you get older, as you mature, you have more context. I think life in general is about getting more context, seeing things in proportion to other things.
君はユニコーンみたいだ。
Can you say more about that?
ユニコーンかどうかはわからない。ネガティブを大ごとにしない。ポジティブを楽しみたい。sunny side up の人間だ。
Well, you know, because we've talked about a lot outside of your podcast, I'm into meditation. So, a lot of the meditation I do is changing looking at space from different perspectives, not the normal perspective that we have right this minute. So I I expand my mind from the earth to the sun to the solar system to the galaxy to the clusters of galaxies to the universe to the multiverse. Just go way way way way hot and then bring it all the way back in and then go into the molecule and the atom and the proton and the nucleus and right in the middle of all that go to strings and and and I find that accordioning making making my mind like an accordion getting really big and then really really small. And they're doing the same thing with time. Looking at time, go back towards my life over the last few decades and then go back centuries and millennia and just keep going way way way back all the way back 13.8 billion years. Go back all the way to the big bang and then go all the way forward and like picture the world going forward for forward forward forward for forward. That time and space justosition for me at least different things work for different people gives me context. It gives me humility, gives me humbleness. It shows that I'm I'm just one thing right here in a major major thing going on. I'm just one little little tiny debt. But at the same time, I'm part of that. So, I'm very uplifted. I'm very inspired. I'm very motivated. Like, wow, I'm part of like a real big deal here. It's great. We all are. We're all part of this huge huge huge huge huge thing. So, I think context is really important. It gives you meaning. It gives you purpose. It gives you understanding. It gives you wisdom.
自分への独り言は優しい? 継続的な内面の声は?
I know you hate when I say this because we've talked about this prior. It's like you obviously know I study uncommon people for a living, right? Like
合理的には優しい方だ。人生に対しても。
they do a great job at it.
僕のはデイビッド・ゴッギンズみたいで、「足りない」「良くない」と欠点ばかり見える。過去のポッドキャストを聴いても、良いところは見えず欠陥だけが見える。
I appreciate unique.
コメントする。認知行動療法が教えるように、人はスキーマ——世界を見るプリズム——を持って生まれ、不十分だ、弱い、欠陥だ、魅力がない、愛されない、というコア信念で曇ることがある。対処は二通りある。
まず妥当化し、それから反論する。否定から始めない。「大変な仕事で完璧じゃないから、ネガティブが出るのは当然」と認めたうえで、「証拠は何か? これは合理的か、スキーマか?」と問う。部下にも同じスキーマを持つ人がいて、「いつかバレる」「偽物の仮面だ」と自動ネガティブ思考のドローンが鳴り続けている。時間の無駄だが、それが彼らの現実だ。
もう一つは、ただ観察し、受け入れる仏教的な道だ。僕は両者を行き来する。ネガティブが入ってくるのは当然だ。祖先の幽霊と踊っている。生存と繁殖に良かった遺伝子が今も残っている。だからただ観察する、というのもある。最もシンプルな仏教瞑想は呼吸を観察することだけだ。収録前にミニ瞑想をしたのもその流れだ。
僕は「自分の外に出る」より、中心に戻る方が好きだ。センタリング——中心を見つけること。子供の頃のサマースクールで、陶芸の「中心を取る」本を読んだ。大学でビル・ディクソンに音楽を学び、即興(彼はジャズと呼ばず black music と言った)でも「中心に戻れ」と言われた。どこへでも即興できるが、共通の中心に戻る。瞑想にも、事業にも、人生哲学にも、その概念を入れている。
Yeah, I appreciate it. But like think about how crazy it is. Like the people that I study on founders is they were so good at their job somebody wrote a book about their life. Like you're talking about very small but most of their inner monologues. You're different. You have a much more positive energy. And like there's almost like a let me let me give some context here. We were together a few months ago at a mutual friend's birthday party in Miami. our friend Rick. And at that uh there's a bunch of interesting people at the party. One of them it was Apollo Ono. Okay, Apollo Ono is the most decorated winter American winter a uh Olympian of all time. Uh he's become a friend. I met him through the podcast and he walks up to me and this is one of the funniest things and you know cuz he has people think you're Olympian like he was training since he was a kid. His dad would make him get up at like 5 in the morning and run drills in the in the school parking lot. But he still comes from like a very positive he he has a great relationship with his dad. normally it's like you know not good when when they're put under the circumstances. So he was asking me he's just like I see this pattern in you know when you're reading all these hundreds of biographies about these great entrepreneurs that like there is something inside of them driving them is actually negative it could be insecurity could be you know they grew up in poverty could be a bad relationship with their family and he's like are they all like that and I you're like 20 ft away you see that guy over there you go I go you know who that is he goes no I go that's Brad … Jacobs I was like I guarantee you he's not driven by that this is what I mean you're uncommon amongst unc common Because at least from the outside in the conversation I had is like I think part of this impenetrable nature that you have in like oh yeah business is problems it's going to come you what do what do you think we're doing here like it you don't seem to be rattled by them. So like what is your inner monologue like when when like you're doing huge … deals right now. You're doing all kinds of crazy stuff. You built eight separate billion dollar companies. You don't do that by accident. So how do you make like I'll stop talking there. What is your inner monologue like? So it goes back to what Miss Mson used to say is problems are your friend.
それは完璧主義に聞こえる。若い頃、自分は完璧主義で苦しんだ。
You want to you don't want to just tolerate problems. You want to embrace problems. You want to hug problems. Problems are the way you succeed. You want to run to the fire. You don't want to run run away from the fire. Be brave. You want to be courageous. Go into it. I think you can start with anything that's anything. And in this case, in Apollo's case, he starts with and other people he's studied start with negativity, trauma, stress, insecurity, fear, anxiety, and then that's their motivator. They they zero in on that and then that makes them run faster.
自分だけでなく、他人も完璧であってほしかった。宇宙も完璧であってほしかった。すべてが思いどおりにスイスイ進んでほしかった。それが現実じゃないとわかった。
Was that ever your case?
三者とも完璧じゃない。本にも「物事が完璧に進まなくても驚かない。宇宙の性質だ。大きな問題に最良の機会がある」とある。チャーリー・マンガーと死の半年〜八ヶ月前に三時間夕食したとき、いちばん残ったメモが「問題へのほぼ完全な無関心。時々トラブルがあるのは避けられない。なぜ気にする?」だった。十年代の経験がある人の言葉だ。
No, that's not my case.
コメントが二つある。ひとつはビッグバンだ。現在のモデルでは、物質と反物質のわずかな不均衡——不完全——から宇宙ができた。初めが完璧ならビッグバンは起きない。僕たちは不完全の子どもだ。不完全は悪いことじゃない。不完全は良い。完璧を期待するとストレスになる。うまくいかない。
This is I don't You're like a a unicorn.
二十代で「自分も周りも宇宙も完璧で」と思っていた頃から、今の理解までどれくらいかかった?
So I I don't know that I'm a unicorn. I don't embrace negativity. I I I'm okay with it, but I don't make a big deal about negativity. I'd much rather enjoy the positivity. I'm a sunny side up guy.
United Rentals のCEOを約十年やって退き(会長は続けた)、次の大きなことを一から始めようとした。大企業を回していたあと、スクラッチからスタートアップをやりたかった。何年か模索し、見つからず、金融危機が来て、人生で唯一、臨床的にうつだった時期がある。ベック抑うつ質問票でもうつだった。
But your inner monologue, are you nice to yourself?
すごい。
Your ongoing inner monologue.
素晴らしい認知療法のセラピストを見つけ、週二回・各一時間半を二年続けた。人生で最高の投資のひとつだ。安全で秘密が守られ、信頼できる専門家のもとで、自動思考——ネガティブで非合理で建設的でない思考——を見極め、まず妥当化し、反論し、建設的な見方へ導く。
数回のセッションのあと彼は言った。「君の測りがわかった。聞きたいか?」「聞きたい」。「完璧主義で苦しんでいる」。すべてが完璧である「ねばならない」「すべき」「命令」を、好みに落とす。「良くありたい。良くあってほしい。うまくいってほしい。でもそうでなくていい。それでも幸せでいられる。実際、いつもはうまくいかない」。現実を急進的に受け入れる。ベゾスの言う「現実と戦うな。現実はいつも勝つ」だ。
I'm reasonably nice to life. Yeah, I am.
ベゾスには「批判されたくない、ストレスが嫌なら、何もしなければいい」という趣旨の言葉もある。
I am vicious. I sound like uh you know David Gogggins is this like
そのとおり。部屋でNetflixを見てDoorDashを頼めばいい。でも誇れることは何もできない。かつての僕には「みんなに好かれ、尊敬され、良い報道とレビュー、株は毎日上がる」という要求——唾を飲むような強迫——があった。それも完璧主義で、現実じゃない。今は「良く言われたいが、悪く言われてもいい。真実があるなら学び、歪みなら自分は変わらない」に変わった。大きな文脈では、たいていの問題は本当は大したことじゃない。その場では大きく見え、破局化しドラマ化するが、大半は悪い問題ですらない。
Oh, yeah. I was just someone was talking the
いつも言うが、機会は奇妙な獣で、しばしば損失のあとに現れる。
Yeah. My inner monologue talking about my inner monologue sounds like David Gogggins versus like you're not doing enough. This wasn't good enough. Like I see the problems. So like I attack them like it's like oh like I'll listen to like a past podcast or some anything I've done. I was like, and all I see are the flaws. I don't see any of the good part.
常にプレイがある。Mr. Jess の会話に戻る。いま顔面に投げられたものがどれだけ醜くても、使い方があり、成功に変えられる。悪い場所から始まっても、ポジティブと成功に変えられる。
So, let let me comment on that. I think there's two different ways you can approach that. So, yes, as cognitive behavior therapy has taught everyone, we're born with a schema, a prism through which we see life. And that can be clouded by core core beliefs of I'm inadequate, I'm weak, I'm defective, I'm unattractive, I'm unlovable, all kinds of negative stuff. Now, there's two ways you can approach on that. You can either dispute those things first, validate, then dispute. So say, "Well, of course I'm hearing this. I have executives who report to me over the years that have the exact same schema as you just described where they're always saying, "Oh, I'm no good at this. Oh, I'm I'm going to when people realize how bad I am, I'm just faking it. I'm wearing this mask and I'm I'm doing a bad job. I'm going to get fired. People are hiding stuff against me because they don't they don't respect me." All this like negative selft talk. It's a complete waste of time. But nevertheless, that's their reality. The reality is they have this steady drone of automatic negative thoughts. There's two ways to deal with that. Either you can dispute them, but first validate it. Don't start with the disputing. First validate and say, "Okay, yeah, of course I'm having all these negative thoughts because I got a tough job." For example, I I have a big job. There's a lot of pressure and I'm not perfect, so I'm not getting everything right. And so I do mess stuff up and and I do get things wrong and all that negative talk. talk and then you you catastrophize on those negative things and make them into huge huge issues when they're really should be minimized if you put in proper context. So you first validate it but then dispute it and say well what does the evidence say here? Is this really a rational thought or is just my schema kicking it? To me when you say that it's like I think you have this gift to step outside of yourself which now you're saying but when I say you step out outside of yourself you're like no I'm in myself.
ここがまた珍しい。多くの伝記の人は、長いあいだ一つの人生の仕事に取り組む。君はなぜ何度も会社を起こし続ける? 何が起きている?
I I I I much prefer to be in myself not myself. I like to come to center.
それが僕の「もの」だ。誰にも自分のものがある。君は大量の情報を消費して、最も重要な要点に蒸留する——それがスーパーパワーだ。だからやっている。野球でも演技でも歌でもなく、得意なことをやっている。僕が得意なのは、統合すべき正しい業界を見抜くことだ。そしてツールキットがある。同じ古いツールキットだ。
Okay.
前回も言っていた。そのツールキットを説明してほしい。事業の作り方の説明が好きだ。
I like to find the center. The first time that concept of centering came about was when I was uh I went to enrichment camp at uh at school in the summertime and there was a book they gave out called on centering. I don't remember who wrote it and had a picture of someone making pottery and and they were explaining in the book that it's all about finding the center of of the of the pot you're making. So centering, finding that inner calmness, finding that zone where you're in the groove. And everybody has it. Everybody has that. You just got to find it. And that's that's one of life's missions is to find that center, find that inner calmness zone. And then when I went to college and I studied music under Bill Dixon, same concept came out. So I'm familiar. They said, "Come back to the center." So we're playing improvisation, what he called black music. Some people might call it jazz. He didn't like the word jazz. playing playing playing playing with some friends and then you have to find the center, come back to center, back to the center, back to the center. So there'd be a center point in the music. You could go anywhere you wanted in the music. You can improvise all over the place, but come back to center and then everybody come back to their common center. So So I've I've incorporated this concept of centering of finding a center into my meditation practices into my business practices into my philosophy of life. So I like to find centers. But going back to what we were saying before, so you have this negative selft talk coming. You can either take one of two paths. You can take the path of validating and disputing it and seeing it in a proper rational way or you can take the approach of just witnessing it, just enjoying it and just just it is what it is. It's mindful acceptance of it. So acceptance of that and I I I vacascillate between those two. Sometimes I do the you ask how I do it. my internal monologue. If negativity creeps in, of course it creeps in. I'm I'm I'm dancing with the ghosts of my ancestors just the way you and everybody else are dancing with the ghosts of the ancestors. Evolution worked very slowly over generations, over long periods of time. So, we always have the set of genes that were good for survival and procreation of our ancestors, but not necessarily now. We still have in the gene pool all these like irrational thoughts. So, another way to look at it is just just observe it. kind of more of a Buddhist way. Just observe it. Like so one of the ways, the most simplest Buddhist meditation is just observe your breath. Just observe your breath. I mean, how easy can that be? All you got to do is we just did this before we started recording. Like, let's go through a miniature like meditation before we begin. Like, I don't ever do that. And I probably start should start doing it. I just kind of wake up and go and just try to attack things that I feel like, and don't get me wrong, like I absolutely I'm obsessed with what I do. I love love my work. work on it seven days a week, but I wanted to be the best in the world at it. And that's where it's like, oh, you just see these deficiencies.
第一に、正しい業界を見つける。大きい。成長している。断片化している。妥当な価格で買える。テクノロジーがまだ十分に使われていない。近い将来にAIや自動化で根こそぎ破壊されない。ごみ処理、建設機器レンタル、輸送・物流、そして今は流通——いずれも同じ特性だ。
第二に、素晴らしいチームを組む。概して自分より賢く、自分の領域では自分より才能がある人たち。CHROはHRと報酬とタレント採用のすべてを知っている。M&Aチームはディールをドラマにせず完遂できる。財務会計は急成長企業の帳簿をきれいに保てる。それぞれがプロだ。
それから報酬を整える。シニアチーム全員をパートナーにし、大量のエクイティを渡す。ただし条件がある。ベスティングはするが、五年間売れない。しかも大半は最後の二年でベスティングする。長期関係へのコミットだ。人の出入りや燃え尽きはあるが、多くは長く残り、チームとして働く。
相互のルールは敬意を保ちつつ、異なる角度を奨励する。対立し、論じる——「口論」より、部分的に重なり部分的に衝突する見方を提示し、リスク調整して何が正しいかを科学的に探る。終日の試行錯誤とA/B実験だ。一貫した経営チーム——スーパーオーガニズム、脳のような組織——が、業界に攻める力になる。ノイズのない、まとまったチーム。
本業は二つ。妥当な価格で会社を買うこと(調達コストと展開先のスプレッド)と、買った会社を改善することだ。高すぎたらやらない。妥当なら、安くなくても全力で行く。安く奪う必要はない。改善は、価格設定、調達、HR、報酬制度、テックスタック——AからZまで。変革が得意だ。EBITDAで十億ドルの会社を、三〜五年で利益を倍にする。主要案件の多くでそれをやってきた。Con-way、Norbert Dentressangle、その他。みんな「うまくいっている」と言うが、三年後に利益が倍になっている。同じプレイブックを業界ごとに少し磨きながら回している。
So that sounds to me like perfectionism. So I suffered a lot from perfectionism when I was younger. I wanted to be perfect.
「それが自分だ」と分かっている感じだ。若い天才起業家の神話があるが、歴史を見ると最良の仕事はキャリアの数十年後に出ることが多い。経験、知恵、資源、練習——すべて本当だ。でも僕の仮説は、自分をよりよく知っているということだ。かつて「自分に真正な事業」と言っていたが、マイケル・デルの自伝の方がうまい——自分に自然な事業。
デルは19歳で始め、IBM(当時世界で最も価値のある会社、初の時価総額1000億ドル企業)に寮から挑んだ。リー・ウォーカーという二十歳上の助けが四年で限界を迎え、髪が抜け、背中が痛み、眠れなくなった。マイケルは逆にエネルギーを得ていた。自然な事業だからだ。「起きて、取りかかる」だけ。君もそうか? 八つのビリオンダラー企業を起こした人を他に知らない。止まれないみたいに見える。
Not only did I want to be perfect, I wanted everybody else to be perfect. [laughter] Not only did I want myself and others to be perfect, I wanted the universe to be perfect. I wanted everything just go swimmingly well at my my beck and call in command. Well, it turns out that's not reality.
それが僕のやることだ。やり方を知っている。
None of those three constituents are perfect. There's something that you said in your book. Uh it's actually in this this section that I was writing down. You're like, I'm not surprised when things don't go perfectly. That's the nature of the universe. The big problems can be where the best opportunities lie. And so obviously, you know, like anytime I read something, it's not that I'm reading it. I think about how it relates to every single thing else I've experienced and all the other books I read. And um I remember I got to have dinner with Charlie Mer. I spent three hours with him uh you know, 6 months, eight months before he died. There's like a trend here unfortunately where it's like kind of dangerous. [laughter] remember you're like, I don't know. I don't know if I'm going to have dinner with you. Um, but one of the things I loved, it was a top note I left myself because as soon as I left there, I just wrote down like what I learned and it said that Charlie has an almost complete indifference to problems. Troubles from time to time should be expected. This is inescapable, so why let it bother you? It's like one of the things I most admired about him. He's like, yeah, it's part of life. What's wrong with you? Like, you know, he had nine 10 decades of of life experience. He was way further down the line and obviously way wiser than I was. So
だから自然なんだ。
I have two comments on that. One is when you go back go back to the big bang
何十年もあらゆる失敗をして磨き、勝ちのフォーミュラがある。チームも実行できる。CEOや創業者はクレジットを全部取りがちだが、実際に成し遂げているのは大勢のチームだ。過小評価したくない。
the current construct model of how the universe was created. It was actually created out of imperfection. There was like a slight imbalance between matter and antimatter. Just a slight imbalance. A lot of debate of what caused that. As a result of that, everything came out of that.
本で繰り返される——CEOの最重要職務は、卓越した人材の採用。では、何があれば君は止まる?
Had there not had there been perfection at the beginning of the universe, the big bang would not have happened. So we are imperfection. We are the children of imperfection. Imperfection is good. Imperfection is not bad. Expecting perfection is will cause you stress and strain. It won't won't really work.
わからない。近い将来には見えない。つい数ヶ月前にも会社を始めたばかりだ。
When you were in your 20s though, you said, "Hey, I wanted to be perfect. Not only do I want to be perfect, I want everybody around me to be perfect. I wanted the universe to be perfect." Like how long did it take for you to learn what you just explained?
僕が尊敬する人の多くに共通する。マキシムにした——好きなことをやっているなら、エグジット戦略は死だ。サム・ゼルは「死ぬまでディールをする」と言い、実際そうした。マンガーも同じで、シリコンバレー銀行破綻の直後に会ったとき、子供が菓子屋にいるようだった(人が傷つくのは望まないが、金融パニックは人生で何度も見てきた、と)。
マイアミのDesign District、Harry's Pizzeriaで妻とのデート中にふと思った。「好きなら無料でやる」ではなく、もう一段ある——好きなら、金を積まれても止められない。スティーブ・ジョブズに「いくら払えばAppleをやめる?」は通じない。エンツォ・フェラーリ、エスティ・ローダー、エドウィン・ランド、ココ・シャネル、ミシュラン兄弟——同じだ。君にも価格がない気がする。
When I stepped down from United Rents, a c I still stay as chairman. When I stepped down as CEO of United Rentals had done it for about 10 years and I wanted to do my next big thing. I wanted to do another startup from from beginning. I was running a big company. I wanted to start it from scratch and there was a period of a couple years where I was trying to figure out what I was going to do and and I didn't find it and a great financial crisis came and was kind of lost. I was kind of it's kind of it was probably the only time in my life that I was depressed. I'm just not depressed. But that period of time I was actually clinically depressed. I took the Beck Depression Inventory and I came up Yep. depressed.
今挙げた成功者は、全員オールインだ。部分参加じゃない。計画の実行に100%集中している。チームにも同じ情熱とコミットを持つ人が要る。
Wow.
(※ここで HubSpot 等のスポンサー読み上げあり。本文では省略)
A・B・Cプレイヤーの見分けも、本の思考実験が秀逸だ。「辞める」とオフィスに入ってきたらどう感じるか、だ。
So So I found a amazing cognitive therapist and I went to the guy twice a week, hour and a half a shot for two years. It was fantastic. one of the best things I've ever done in my life because what we did was in a in a in an environment that was very safe and confidential and trusting with someone who was a professional at at at psychology. I was able to first of all identify and then notice more fully my automatic thoughts, the negative
そう。CHROと常にタレントを見ている。幸せで動機づけられているかを確認する。円グラフで最大のスライスは人の問題だ。「ほとんど」ではないが、いちばん大きい。
スタンフォードのMBA学生が90年代後半に16人のテック創業者にインタビューした本『In the Company of Giants』で、ジョブズは言う。創業者だから採用に時間がない? 違う、最重要だ。共同創業者は会社の50%。十人目はまだ10%。「時間がない」とは、何をしているのか、と。君の本とまったく同じだ。
人だ。システムもテックも予算も顧客も販売も重要だが、卓越した人とリーダーなしに卓越はできない。特に上位数十人に時間を使う。全員が「勝つために入っている」かを確認する。
思考実験——その人が「反論オファーの話じゃない。もう移る。円滑な引き継ぎの話だ。君を干上がらせたくない」と辞めるのを想像する。
周りは全員Aがいい。関係が切れたら自分が迷うほど価値のある関係。相手にも同じように感じてもらいたい。チームと会社を愛し、一緒に世界を取りに行く相互関係だ。本には「お互いを殺す代わりに競合を殺せ」という章があったと思う。
and irrational thoughts, unconstructive thoughts and then first validate them, then dispute them. first join and then lead to a more constructive way of looking at things. So that cognitive therapy approach of identifying the the the thoughts and then and then dealing with them really was the turning point in my life on this perfection thing because after a few sessions he said you I kind of know what's going on here now for I've gotten your your measure you want to hear I said yeah I want to hear it and he said you're suffering from perfectionism [laughter] like like you want everything to be perfect and it ain't so we need to get over that we need to reduce these demands these musts these shoulds, these commands that either I or you or
タイトルは軽いが中身は本気だ。一貫した経営チームと、敬意を保ちつつ異論を奨励するルールが、何十億ドルもの価値の基盤だ。Aプレイヤーの定義を「この人が抜けたら終わる」とする思考実験は完璧だ。「Aプレイヤーを雇え」は誰もが言うが、実際の見分けが難しい。
本の一文——組織はパーティーだ。場のバイブスを上げる人だけを招待しろ。チームと長い時間を過ごすから、好き合いは大事だ。ベゾスの株主書簡にも「尊敬できない人と働くには人生は短すぎる」とある。起業家とCEOの贈り物は、誰を周りに置くかを選べることだ。
the rest of the world is perfect to, you know, preferences where I would like me to be better. I would like you to be better. I'd like things to go better, but they don't have to. I can still be happy. And frankly, they're not going to all the time. So, I need to accept that. Need to radically accept that. I need to I need to be in reality, not put these, you know, Je mentioned Bezos. Bezos says a lot of cool stuff, but one of the things he says often is uh don't fight with reality because reality always wins.
人だ。人がプロセスとワークストリームと変革を作る。
Yeah.
リチャード・ブランソンの定義が好きだ——ビジネスとは、誰かの人生を良くするアイデア。機会は無限にある。技術が変わっても、別の奉仕の仕方が開く。ヘンリー・フォードは「金はサービスの結果として自然に来る」。
ピキサーのエド・キャットマルの話も同じで、「アイデアと人、どちらが大事か」と聴衆に聞くと毎回アイデアと答えられるが、違う。凡庸なアイデアを卓越したチームに渡せば直すか捨ててより良いものを出す。優れたアイデアを凡庸なチームに渡せば壊す。 アイデアは人から来る。
君の本の明示的な助言は——頭脳に代わるものはない。優れた知性でスクリーニングすると候補の90%が落ちる。最初に見る。CEO特性のうち組織成功と最も相関するのは高いIQ。最も賢い人の採用に倍賭けしろ。
So, the reality is is nothing's perfect. Like literally nothing is perfect that I found yet.
賢い人が欲しい。特に自分より賢い人。持ち上げ、教えてくれる人。
He has another line I think that's related. It's similar to the idea in your book where he's just like if you don't want to be criticized and you don't want stress and you don't do anything.
専門特化? さっき「自分より上手い」とも言っていた。
Exactly. [laughter] It's just like then just sit in a room and watch Netflix and order a Door Dash or something, but like you're not going to do anything that you can be proud of.
大半は専門特化だ。財務、投資、戦略、テック——一インチ幅・一マイル深さ。だが専門を超える人間的資質の方が、同等かそれ以上に大事だ。
So that's another irrational thought you see people having. I I used to have the saliva bump. I don't have it now because I went through that that therapy thing and it turned a switch on in my brain. Is a demand that I that everybody likes me and everybody respects me and everybody says great stuff about me and I get good press and I get good reviews and the stock just goes up every single day. Well, that's not going to happen. That's called perfectionism. That's that's not reality. So you just kind of modify that to well sure like everybody else I'd like to people to say good stuff about me rather than bad stuff about me but I don't really care if people say bad stuff about me then okay maybe there's some truth in it maybe some good thing I can learn from that or maybe they're just off and they don't know me and they're just kind of they're doing they're imposing their distortions on me but does that really change who I am? It really doesn't if somebody is saying something bad about me or is that does that really matter? It doesn't matter really at the court. And again, goes back to context in the larger context of things. Most problems really don't matter. They just don't matter. Maybe at the time they seem like one and maybe we're kicking in magnifying those problems and catastrophes and dramas, but most problems really aren't aren't a bad pro thing.
説明して。
I always say opportunity is a strange beast. It usually it frequently appears after a loss.
賢い。正直。勤勉。協調的。ワークライフの「バランス」より仕事側に本気で入り、楽しんでいる人。教壇の教師のように鞭を振るわなくても、早く来て遅く帰り週末もやりたい人。キャリアと会社の集合的成功が、存在の重要な部分——ゲシュタルト——になっている人。
There's always a play. There's always, no matter what happens, this goes back to the Jesselson conversation. No matter what gets thrown in your face at the moment, it may seem ugly and bad. There's a play. There's a way to utilize that. There's a way to use that. There's a way to to embrace that and turn that into success. Anything can be turned into positivity and success, even if it starts in a bad place. Something came to mind when you were talking uh that's also unusual because most of the people that like I read biographies about they they they go through several different companies so they find like their life's work but normally they're working on something for like a very long time. Why why do you keep starting so many companies like what is going on?
仕事がトップ優先じゃない時期はあった? 最後にバランスしていたのは? 23歳で最初の会社を始めて以来? 四年で数十億までスケールした話もある。
That's my thing. Everybody's got their thing. So everybody So you're a great podcaster. You you have a talent. Your superpower is you can consume a large amount of information and then distill it down to like boom. Here are the most important takeaways from that. It's a It's really brilliant. That's your thing. That's why you're doing it, right? That's what you're good at. You're not playing
それ以来ずっとアンバランスだ。週七日働き、休暇はほとんどない。でも僕にとっては「仕事」じゃない。クラフトで、スキルだ。楽しんでいる。
professional baseball or, you know, acting or singing, whatever. You're you're doing what you're good at. This is what I'm good at. I'm good at
伝記には、職業的成功のために健康や関係を犠牲にする警告話も多い。
figuring out what's the right industry to consolidate.
それは賛成しない。
Mhm.
君はまだ結婚していて良い父親だが、仕事以外の趣味は瞑想と音楽がほとんど、と理解している。
僕は長いあいだエド・ソープを「個人の設計図」にしていた——量的ヘッジの先駆、ブラックジャックのカードカウント、『Beat the Dealer』、金が十分なあと時間を金に換えすぎない、良い結婚、健康。五つの重要事項のうち仕事が50%くらい。車で来ながら思った。嘘をついている。思考と時間の90%は仕事だ。
And secondly, I have a toolkit and it's the same old toolkit. It's not
それは美しいことだ。挙げた成功者のほぼ全員がオールインで、情熱のなかにフローしていた。時間を忘れ、宇宙の残りが消える。得意なことを、好きな人とやり、うまくいく可能性が高い。
業界に入る前のリサーチの量を思うと、本は通読したあと机の近くに置き、一章十分でアイデアを取るリファレンスマニュアルだと思う。ちなみに、続編を書いている。
You told me this last time. Can you explain this? I love the way you describe this toolkit of how you approach building your businesses.
前回は「本は一冊きり、他にない」と言っていた。
So, first I find the right industry. I find something that's large. I find something that's growing. I find something where it's fragmented. I find something where we can buy things at reasonable prices. I find things where technology is would would could be used. It's not very tech forward industry. I find stuff that AI and automation are not going to disrupt in any time in in the near future. So I I find industries that have certain characteristics to it. Whether it was garbage, whether it was construction, whether it was transportation or logistics and now distribution, it's that's they all have the same characteristics, same traits. So that's point number one. Point number two is I then put together an amazing team. I put together a team of people who are generally smarter than me and who are more talented than me in what they do. So I have a great CHRO who knows everything there is to know about HR and compensation and talent recruitment and so forth. I have great M&A team who really know how to do deals and get deals done rather than turn them into dramas. I have great finance accounting people who understand everything there is to know agency about running a a fast growing company and keeping the books clean. So, etc. And I get the team together. Then I get the compensation sorted out. So I make everybody my partner on a senior team and I give people tons of equity. But there's a catch. It could vest but you can't sell it for five years and most of it vests in the last two years. So everyone is committed going back to long-term relationships.
書いたあとフィードバックが大量に来て、もっとこの話を、と言われた。最初は二度と書かないと言った。時間がかかる。でも同じ質問が多すぎて、続編で答えることにした。タイトルは——前作が『How to Make a Few Billion Dollars』、次は 『How to Make a Few More Billion Dollars』。
Sure people come and go for whatever personal reasons or people burn out or whatever but generally speaking most of the team stays for a while and you you work together as a team and then I have I have certain rules of how we're going to interact with each other in a very respectful way but in a way that encourages looking at things from different angles. So we disagree and we argue. Argu is too strong of a word. We present different ways of looking at a situation that partly overlap and partly conflict and then we in a very scientific way figure out well let's let's risk adjust these things figure out what's right. It's it's a scientific experiment ongoing science experiment like all day long of trial and error and experimentation and AB experimenting. And so that culture that we create is gives us a power gives us a power to attack the industry in a way without all the the the noise that a management team has a very coherent team like a super organism like a brain like a very organized group and then I have between all those people we have experience at our main job which is to buy companies at reasonable prices where there's a difference between what we can raise capital at and what we can deploy it And then we have a skill set to be able to improve the companies that we buy. These are the two main things we're good at is buying companies in a disciplined way. Price is too high, we don't do it. Price is reasonable, doesn't have to be cheap. We're not trying to steal companies. If price is reasonable, we go for it with Gusto. And secondly, the other talent that the team collectively has is we know how to improve the businesses. you know how to improve the pricing, improve the procurement, uh the HR element, the compensation systems, the technology, the whole tech stack, just everything from A to Z. We're just good at transformation. We're good at taking a company that is making a billion dollars of Ebida of profit
最高だ。早めにコピーをください。ジョブズからベゾスまで通じるのは——凡庸はいつも見えない。情熱が現れて暴露するまで。
and within three to five years doubling the doubling the profit, doubling the Ebida. That's the main criteria I look at when I look at a at a company is purchase price and secondly can we double the profit in three to five years and and most of my main acquisitions I've done that. Conway, Robert Dangla, knew all these different ones. They were great companies and everyone says, "Oh, they're working really well." Okay. Well, three years later, we doubled the profit. Yeah. Because we apply the toolkit. We apply the play playbook. And it's the same playbook industry after industry. The playbook gets refined a little bit here and there, but it's the same playbook. So, when you say this is just what I do, like to me, you now have figured out who you are as a person, right? I have this weird theory that I can't um I can't prove, but I believe. And you know there's like this myth of like the genius young entrepreneur and I was like well I don't know if you study like you study the history of entrepreneurship pretty intensely. You realize that like people do most of the time their best work many decades into their career. And so there's all kinds of reasons they're like oh they've had more experience they're wiser. They have more resources. They have more practice. I don't dispute that. That is all true. But I have this weird theory that they also know themselves way better. And I think the key to being a great entrepreneur is building a business that's I used to say building a business that's authentic to you. And then I read Michael Dell's excellent autobiography. And he has a better line. He said he built a business that's natural to him. And there's a great story. I want your opinion on this in one second, but there's a great story where, you know, Michael starts in his company was 19. He's in his 20s and it's doing fabulously well, but he realized like, hey, I need some like grown like some I need some help here. And so he he gets this guy. I think his name was Lee Walker if I remember correctly. and he's about 20 years older than than Michael already started a bunch of companies. Rich, you know, didn't have to work anymore, but he he saw an unusual once in a, you know, generation talent and and Michael decides to help him. He lasts like four years. And so I read the book and then I was about to make the podcast on it. I go and see it. I wonder what ever happened to this guy. And I found an interview that he did and he's in his 80s and he's talking about that time and he gave me some of the best context to really understand this story and Michael's story is really story of you and everybody and all the people really are you know very similar people that were studying and he's just like you know Michael starts his company with $1,000 says I'm going to take on IBM for my dorm room. IBM is the most valuable company in the world at the time which I didn't know it was the first company to hit a 100red billion market cap which is nuts and he's you know just the audacity to have that and he's like and the first few years like we're going against this behemoth and I lasted four years I start losing my hair my back hurts I can't sleep I'm unhealthy and he goes but he goes but Michael was energized by it he built a business that was natural to him because he's like this is what I want to do I'm not I'm not losing my hair I'm not you know depressed depressed. My back's not hurting. I can't sleep. I'm like waking up every day just getting after it. So, is that the way you feel about the just like what you're doing? It's like this is it may seem weird because it is in not a pjorative way. It's not weird in a in a negative way. It's I don't know another person that started eight separate billion dollar companies. So, it's like almost like you can't help yourself.
好きだ。
That's what I do and that's I know how to do that.
すでに良い会社を買っても、情熱と執着と最良の人で、まだ結果を伸ばせる。
So, it's just natural to you. This is just like
同意する。ツールキットで入る——価格をアルゴリズムと弾力性分析で攻め、営業を「本社の権威の生徒」ではなくパートナーにし、情報を探す時間を減らすテックを入れ、情報共有を良くする。ブーム、利益が倍。
Yeah. This is this is I I've done it many times before and I and I've made every mistake in the book over the decades and I've learned from those mistakes and I've refined it and refined it. But I have a winning formula. I know how to execute on this and the team I have knows how to execute on it. I don't want to underestimate the team. So one of the things about being the CEO and the founders, you get all the credit, but like there's a lot of people on the team who are doing these things, accomplishing these things.
創業者・CEOのアーキタイプの話をしたい。今はジョブズ型の独裁的意思決定が流行るが、
Yeah. You have a great line in your book which I see over and over again. You said the CEO's most important job is is recruiting superlative people.
それは好きじゃない。
Totally. It's like you're you're so uh my question to you though is like what would it take
批判じゃない。起業の美しさはやり方を選べることだ。Spotifyのダニエル・エクは「コーチの方がプレイヤーより向いている」と言い、世界最高の人材を集め、自分より上手い人にプロダクトやデザインやHRを任せる。若い起業家が「イーロンやスティーブみたいじゃないから起業できない」と思うのを心配している。君のアーキタイプは?
to get you to stop?
正しい人を置き、報酬を揃え、建設的で豊富なコミュニケーションをする。金曜、買収した Beacon の二回目の月次オペレーティングレビュー(MOR)があった。十時間、休憩は十分と五分の二回。誰も端末を触らない。一人がマイクを持っているあいだ、全力で聞き、各点とアクションを議論する。
アジェンダはCEOが上から下ろさない。「俺が一番賢い。これが重要だ」は傲慢で、実は非効率だ。逆をやる。事前にデッキを送り(会議でPowerPointで互いを褒める茶番はしない)、読んだうえでアプリに記入させる——主な学びと、価値創造のためにチーム全員(約25人)が議論すべき質問。それを集約して再送し、学びと質問を1〜10で評価させる。8〜10の質問だけがアジェンダだ。テック、報酬・人、戦略、M&Aなどカテゴリ別に並べる。
結果、一人では作れない良いアジェンダになり、ボスが下ろしたのではなく集合で作ったので、全員が関与する。権威的な教師はいない。スーパーオーガニズム——蜂の巣、アリのコロニー、脳、人体——部分の総和を超える全体だ。ホリスティックで強いアプローチだ。
Yeah. I don't know because I'm not I'm not and I don't see that in my near future. [laughter] I just started the company in the last few months.
何人くらい?
This is what I No, but in general like so this is what I loved about you know most of the people I admire. It's like I I can still remember this you know I I put it into the maximum like if you love what you do your exit strategy is death right [laughter] like like you should be worthy on something. So, like, you know, Sam told me he's like, "I'm going to be doing deals till I died." Well,
昔は40〜50人で試したがうまくいかなかった。MORは月で最も重要な会議で、今は25人上限。20〜25が理想だ。多様な意見と弁証法的議論(多視点→分析→総合→真理)に足り、孔雀のアピールや脆弱さを隠すほどの多さではない。安全圏で「間違っていたかも。こう見始めてきた。XYZがいいと思うが、どう思う?」と言えることが大事だ。思考を柔軟に。白黒二分法ではなく、学び、挑戦されることを良しとする。自分が間違っていたと示すロールモデルでもある。
he was doing deals till he died. Munger, same thing. Like, I I met him right after the um the Silicon Valley bank collapse. It was like going he was like a kid in a candy shop. He just thought this was like the He didn't want people to be hurt, obviously, but he's just like, you know, financial panics that I've seen in my lifetime. Like, of course, this is like nothing new. So, I I was I remember I was uh actually having dinner. I remember it was I was at Harry's Pizzeria in Miami in the Design District. And you know, I was supposed to be paying attention to my wife and on our date and [laughter] I was thinking about the podcast and all the … I'm reading and I go and like take a bite into a piece of pizza and I was like people used to say if you love what you do you do it for free and I go no there's a different level. If you love what you do they couldn't pay you to stop.
その会議で、話す割合は?
There you go.
最初に一時間ほど「州情勢演説」——成功と改善点、投票を読んだうえで最も価値を生む論点——をバランスよく述べる。良いことも悪いことも。励ましもあるが、同じ分量で現実を言う。「この期限にやると言ったのに二週遅れだ。100%にどう届く?」。そのあとは黙る。残りの九時間は部屋を回して意見を聞く。リーダーが話しすぎてはいけない。すでに一時間使った。
And I was like how much money could you have gone to Steve Jobs like hey how much would it take take for you to not work on Apple? That's not why he's doing it. It's that that's not why they're doing it in Enzo Ferrari, Estee Lauder, Edwin Land, Coco Chanel, all these other people like they just can't. Michael Ferrerero, I just the Michelin brothers like this this story over and over again. I get the same sense to you. It's like if I said, "Hey, what price? I'm going to pay you and you can't do any work. You have to stay home. You can't." It's just like there's no price.
数ヶ月前、君の家での朝食でもノートを取っていた。逆だよね——成功したからノートを取るのではなく、ノートを取る人だから成功する。
Everyone you just named all the successful people, they were all in.
面白い話がいっぱいあるからメモする。
They were 100% in. They weren't like partly in and partly aren't. They're in. they're 100% in it completely focused and single-mindedly concentrated on on executing the plan. And that's important. And I want you want to have people on your team who share that passion, that commitment. The best leaders in business are able to spot patterns. But you can't spot patterns if you can't see your data. And most businesses are only using 20% of their data because 80% of your customer intelligence is invisible, hidden in emails, transcripts, and conversations. Unless you have HubSpot. HubSpot is where all of your data comes together so you can see the patterns that matter because when you know more, you grow more. And that is a pattern that never fails. Visit hubspot.com today. That is hubspot.com. That leads me to another great one of your I don't even think you think it's a maxim, but it's how you differentiate between A, B, and C players where you're like I'm I'm just going to summarize this and jump in whenever you want, but um you're you envision you do another thought experiment. Yeah.
Mitchell Rales(Danaher 共同創業者)も、四十人程度の垂直市場ソフトの会議で最前列に座りずっとメモしていた、と友人から聞いた。時価総額二千億ドル級の会社を築いた人が、と不思議がられたが、それが理由だ。ずっとそうだった。ジミー・アイオヴィーンの回でも「偉大さはどこからでも来る」と言っていた。Eminemのデモがトレーラーパークの貧乏な少年から来たように——物議を醸す人を探していたのではなく、偉大さを探していた。
本にある——会社を買うと、最前線も中間管理も一部シニアも「会社をどう改善するか」と一度も聞かれたことがない、とわかる。愚かだ。君は「いちばんバカなことと、いちばん賢いことは何か」と聞く。MORでも分散して聞き、ランクする。
Of okay, do you want to see if you have the absolute best people on your team? Just visualize that they're coming into your office and they're saying, Brad, I quit.
MORの終わり、論点を全部やったあとが人間の時間だ。毎月少し変えるが、数十の質問リストから選ぶ。よく最初に聞くのは「今日誰かが言ったことで、意見が違うものは?」。一人ずつ回る。多くの経営チームでは感情的になってできない。ここではできる。
次に「今日いちばんの学びは? 十時間前には、金の稼ぎ方・顧客への奉仕・従業員エンゲージメント・競合の倒し方について理解していなかった何か」。そのあと外に向けて「この部屋にいないが、現場のMVPは誰か。なぜか」。あとでその人にメールする——会社のリーダー会議でMVPに指名された、理由はこれだ、と。よく泣く。感情的で、良いことだ。
内側にも向ける。「このテーブルで、今日スターが上がったのは誰か。何が印象的だったか」。最後に自分へ——「私は会社を次のように改善すると決意する」を一人ずつ起立して言う。
時間が許せば別室で円になり、最初の数分は黙って互いを見る。数分は長い。好き同士なら不快じゃない。一人ずつ「この人を尊敬する理由」を心のなかで特定し、感謝を送り、五年後の成功を思い描いてポジティブな気を送る。いつも笑顔が出る。終わりに「今日は成功だ」と宣言し、拍手——時には五分も続く——して空港へ帰る。みんな浮揚して帰る。
Yeah.
MVPメールで泣く、という話が好きだ。スケールした会社で現場が無視されるのはよくあるが、リーダー会議の指名を本人に返すのは、インセンティブ以前の「見られている」感覚を作る。
So then what happens next in in this scenario? So I'm always interacting with my CHRO
そのとおりだ。人は認められたい。金だけじゃない。現場が「本社は我々を見ている」と感じると、エンゲージメントが変わる。だからタウンホールもZoomも、現場に行くことも、やめるわけにはいかない。CEOの仕事の一部だ。委譲しすぎると、そこが死ぬ。
and going over talent and making sure everybody's happy and motivated.
どれくらい直感で会社を回している? 直感的な人に見える。
How much percent of your like
思っているより多くないかも。直感はあるが、実験し、ポジティブ心理学や認知療法を学び、瞑想し、自分に効いたことを組織に染み込ませる。キーは濃密で大量のフィードバックループだ。シニア同士、シニアと中間、現場、顧客、ベンダー、投資家——企業を構成する星座のすべての構成員と、正直に激しくコミュニケーションする。
情報共有は多くの会社より広い。競合に聞こえるのが怖い、弱みを市場に知られるのが怖い——ある程度は本当だが、改善の学びの利益がはるかに大きい。コピーしようとしても、すべての材料は持っていない。
a lot I I spend most of my time on people and talent issues.
(睡眠・健康系のスポンサー読み上げは省略)
フロントラインから情報を取る話は、ミシュラン兄弟の話にもつながる。1888年頃、馬車用のゴムブレーキパッドから始まり、「大きなトレンドを正しく取れ」——成長は自転車と自動車だ、とゴムタイヤへ。工場を引き継いだ人が製造を知らず、五十人に「何も知らない。教えてくれ。なぜそうする? もしこうしたら?」と聞き続けた。「一日八時間材料を扱う人は、オフィスのCEOに教えられることがある」。フィルタなしのアクセスが大事だ。
So most of your time there's
まったくそのとおり。組織のあらゆる構成員が話し、フィードバックループを持たねばならない。顧客に聞かなければ、実際よりうまくやっていると思い込む。僕は一日中聞く。匿名サーベイ、360度レビュー、チームのオフィスに入り浸って「どう思う? これは? あれは?」と聞く。
no not the most but the most if I did a pie chart of like how I divide up my time. The largest percent is on people issues. There's a funny story about this and then I I don't want to interrupt but I I do this is inside of me and I just has to come out all these stories because I find them fascinating. So there's two MBA students in uh Stanford in the 90 in late 90s and in 97 they interview uh 16 technology company founders since they're in Silicon Valley at the time you know and they publish this book called in the company of giants and everybody's in there you know Bill Gates and Steve Jobs and everybody else and they're telling Steve they're like well uh you know you're the founder you of course you don't have time to you know recruit people and Steve's like what like no it's the most it sounds exactly what you said in your book it's the most important he goes and he he does great great way to demonstrate the point. He goes, "Let's say you're starting a company, right? You're in Silicon Valley, like what you're doing over here. You pick your co-founder. You should think long and hard about that. Your co-founder is 50% of the company at that point." And then he goes, and then he goes, "But you still goes out." Now, you have to pick the 10th person. That person's 10% of your company, and you're saying you don't have time. Like, what else are you doing?
本の一文が好きだ——上場株式市場で株主にアウトサイズのリターンを届けるため、法外に才能ある人と働くのが好きだ。公開市場からの絶え間ないフィードバックを愛している。
It's all about the people. It's all about the people. you know systems and tech and budgets and customers and sales all these things are really really important but you can't achieve excellence in those things without fantastic people without fantastic leaders and I spend a lot of time especially on the top few dozen people I want to make sure everybody's in it to win it everybody is fully fully engaged and I do a mental exercise where I picture the person coming into my office and saying Brad I quit like this is not a conversation about you making me a counter offer I'm done I've already moved moved and it's over with. This is about a conversation about how do we make an orderly transition because I respect you and I don't want to leave you high and dry. And then I try to feel and visualize what would be my reaction if that person came into me and quit. If my reaction to that is yes, I [laughter] don't want to smile. I don't want to act like I'm happy about this, but you know, I didn't have you know, nobody likes firing people and [laughter] I I just didn't, you know, I I just kept postponing firing that person. I shouldn't have, but I did. And this is great. I don't have to pay severance and [laughter] and you know I that solves that problem. No problem at all. We'll replace them. That's a C player. That's someone really you should get the courage up to take to get off the manage get off the team right away. And then on the second category, if my reaction to it is, you know, it kind of sucks. You know, it's what I would have preferred that person stayed, but it's not the end of the world. We'll hire head hunter. We'll get someone as good, maybe something even better. and you know things will work out. That's a B player. But if when I visualize that person quitting, my reaction to that is pure terror [laughter] and absolute panic and like somebody took a baseball bat and just whacked me in the stomach and then punched me in the face. I'm going, "Oh my god." Like I'm never going to find someone as good as her. No way. Or I'm never going to have someone as talented as that person. I'm never going to have someone who brings to the table their particular superpower.
素晴らしい。いつも同意するわけではないが、どこかに真実がある。世界で最も賢い人たち——年金、基金、ソブリンから何十億も預かったグローバル・アロケーター——から無料の助言が来る。右へ行けと左へ行けが矛盾することも多い。全部を数学的に同時には飲めない。情報と意見とデータを最大限入れたあと、一度無視して内側に入り、「これがやりたいことだ」と決断する。それがCEOだ。入力なしではエコーチェンバーだ。常に挑戦される必要がある。
I am. and I I don't even I can't even hear what they're saying anymore. So, I'm just like having this internal panic dialogue going on. That's what you call an A player. So, I want all A players around me. I want people whose relationship with me I value so much that if it was terminated, I would be lost. And I want them to feel the same way. I want to have mutual relationships. I want people who love being in relationship with the team, with the company, and that we all are in in it together to go conquer the world. I I think I I had named it, it's been two years since I wrote the book, but I think I had a chapter that said how to kill a competition instead of killing each other.
昔は上場が大きな目標だった。今は資金を集めた創業者でも上場したくない人が多い。助言は?
And and that's, you know, it's kind of funny, but it it's a serious it's a serious title is you don't want to have a dysfunctional management team. One of the most important things that has allowed us to create tens and tens of billions of dollars of value is the management team's coherent. We have the right people on the management team and we have the rules of the road of how we're going to deal with each other in a respectful way that still encourages differences of opinion. First of all, I love the way you describe because everybody says, "Oh yeah, hire a players and like people it's really hard to differentiate like what does that actually mean?" And I think this thought experiment is perfect. It's like we are … If this person leaves, that's an A player. That's a way to think about this. But this also goes down to your gift and why I think um I've learned so much from you. One partially it's like your ability to like have very clear thinking and then put it in a memorable way. So you were just talking about like the relationships that you have with the people you work for. You have a line in the book where like he says an or an organization is like a party. You only want to invite people who bring the vibe up. My team and I spend a lot of time together. So it's a big deal that we like one another.
上場できる成熟と、できれば収益性が要る。その基準に達しても選ばない人がいるなら、理由を聞きたい。公開の監視や hassle が怖いのかもしれない。一時間前の話に戻る——「常に良く言われたい」というコア信念があると、上場後は常に賛成派と否定派、買い手と売り手がいる現実が耐えられない。否定派は時に道を正す。コストを切りすぎてサービスが落ちている、マージンは良いがトップラインとオーガニック成長はどうだ、と。
僕のすべての事業で、最終的に優れたバリュエーションと株主価値を生むために必要だったのは主に二つ。競合と市場より速くトップラインを伸ばしシェアを取ること、そして利益率を上げること。それができれば他は流れ込む。だから入力は多いほどいい。公開市場は何百、何千の声をくれる。驚異的なデータだ。
ブランドも速く大きく育ち、人材の磁石になる。知名度がなければ入社を疑われる。リサーチ、プレス、公開サイトで何をしているか明確なら、既知の量として買ってもらえる。報酬も、iPhoneで毎日価値が見える株式になる。プライベートのファントム株は、売るまで価値がわからない。高成長プランでは、公開は報酬面でも素晴らしい。
Yeah. I I agree with that.
プライベートにすべきか迷った時期は?
[laughter]
1992年からずっと公開で、好きだ。建設的で、プレッシャーが好きだ。ストリートの声を聞き、同意するところは同意し、証拠を持って間違っていると思うところは情熱的に反対する。特にヘッジファンドは今四半期(90日)に焦点を当てがちで、長期には最悪だ。現場のコストを切ってサービスと士気を壊し、人手不足は過剰人員より悪い——そういう話になる。公開が好きだ。
who said that that was a good one.
「プレッシャーが好き」とは? どういう意味?
Bezos has a line in I think his shareholder letters is like life is too short to work with people you don't admire. Like it's same situation. It's like you're in charge. You get to choose. Again, this goes back to one of the gift of being the CEO of being an entrepreneur. Like it's very rare that you get to literally choose who has access to who's around you. And I love this idea. It's like hey the organization is just like a party. You want people to uh you only want people to
個人投資家、富裕層、ソブリン、年金、基金、ミューチュアル——多くの人が株を買うために送金している。人生最大級のプレッシャーは、受け取った以上を返すためにできるすべてをすることだ。隣人や友人の九割以上が投資している、と言っても過言ではない時期もある。親族や友人が「分散なんていい、ブラッドとそのチームにオールインだ」と退職金の三分の二を入れる。落としたくない。そのプレッシャーが好きで、楽しみ、動機づけられ、鼓舞される。ここに大事な役割があると感じられる。
it's all about the people. It's all about the people because the people then create all the all the different processes and work streams and transformations and everything.
それは出しておくべきだと思う。ネガティブな独り言や、週七日オールインの生き方の文脈で、「一文で世界が変わる」ことがある。サウスウエスト航空のハーブ・ケレハーは、破産が普通の業界で四十年連続黒字という狂人的な成功をしたが、バーボンとチェーンスモークの人でもある(推奨しない)。前立腺がんと言われても「前立腺では吸わない」と冗談を言った人だ。あるインタビューで「ストレスをどう扱う?」と聞かれ、「扱わない。好きだ」と答えた。ゲームにいたかった。弁護士から35歳で航空を始め、初フライトまで四年の法廷闘争——「これが欲しい。プレッシャーが欲しい」だった。
This is very fascinating because like it's obviously, you know, business is people, right? You're not like the people that are building the product, but like all a business is the best definition of business ever heard actually came from Richard Branson. He says all businesses is is an idea that makes somebody else's life better, right? And like there's infinite that's why there's always more opportunity because there's infinite ways we think technology is going to like it changes things but then it just usually opens up other ways to make other people's lives better. So just focus on like if you're looking for an opportunity how can I just serve other people. Another uh line that's very related to this is Henry Ford where he says money comes naturally as a result of service. Like I think those two ideas go together. The reason uh I I was thinking about this though the best way I just I've heard describe what you were just saying it's all about people work with the best people you possibly can. the A players we're gonna talk about uh you have this great line about there's no substitute for brains but before that it's like the way that I've heard this described best in my opinion is from Ed Catmill the founder of Pixar right he would go around and give all these talks and he was actually like shocked that he would ask the audience like what's more important people or ideas he says every single time people got it wrong he said it was the ideas and he's like no it's the people and so he has this great line where he's like listen if you give a mediocre idea right to a brilliant team, they're either going to fix it or they'll throw it out and come up with something better or something new. But if you give a great idea to a mediocre team, they're going to screw it up. So, it's obviously because ideas come from people. So, it's the people. Um, so
United Rentals のあと、次を探していた時期の話も聞きたい。資産運用を見て、ケン・グリフィンに会いにシカゴへ行った、と本や会話で出ていた。
He says it in like just way, but you have a very like explicit piece of advice in your book that I think is interesting where you're like screening for there's no substitute for brains. Screening for superior intelligence eliminates 90% of all candidates. So, it's the first thing I look at. There's no substitute for smarts. The CEO trait mostly most closely correlated with organizational success is a high IQ. Double down on hiring the brightest.
そう。United Rentals のあと次を探し、資産運用も見ていた。シカゴでケン・グリフィンにアポを取ろうとして断られた。今はフロリダで隣人で、電話は折り返してくれると思うが、当時は会えなかった。謙虚になった。「有名でも、誰にでも会えるわけじゃない」。
Yeah. Well, you want smart people. And I particularly want people who are smarter than me. I want people who are who uplift me, who teach me. I don't want to be
ケンは別リーグだ、と君は言う。いつかエピソードをやるべきだと思う。大統領にもなれる人だ、とまで言っていた人もいる。
Do you want them specialized? Because you mentioned earlier, you said you want some them smarter than you, but also better at their particular
ケンははるかに上だ。非常に魅力的な人だ。やるならぜひ。紹介できるならしてほしい、とも思うが、それはまた別の話だ。
君の本は、他の創業者・CEO・投資家から学んだマキシムに満ちている。亡くなった フレッド・スミス(FedEx) から話してほしい。伝記を読んだが、これほど難しいオペレーション企業を発明した例は少ない。プレッシャーを欲しがる人の話だ。LinkedInで「時間を共にする機会を逃さなかった」と書いていた。なぜ?
The vast majority of them are specialized. Okay.
フレッドは本を推薦してくれた。ウォール街では競合なのに、だ。感動した。特別な人だった。誠実さの塊だった。
初めて会ったのは2013年。2011年に業界に入り、買収を重ねて業界紙の一面に出始めた頃、アトランタの全米製造業協会(NAM)でフレッドが基調講演。聴衆にいた。誰かが「ブラッド・ジェイコブズをどう思う?」と聞き、心臓が止まった——アイコンにブランドを潰される、と。彼は言った。「あの男の働きぶりを見るのが好きだ。勇気を持って業界に入り、左右に買い、大きな目標がある。注目している」。泣きそうになった。講演後に近づき「Smithさん、Brad Jacobsです。言葉に感謝します」と言ったら、「まず、Fredだ」と。そこから素晴らしい友情が始まった。何度も会い、Business Council でも——彼は四半世紀以上の最長メンバーだった——他のCEOに会い、思考を聞いた。
ビジョンと情熱と grit。ベトナムで海兵隊、ヘリで撃たれながら戦死した海兵の遺体を回収し、パープルハートやシルバースター級の勇気。誰もがフレッドを愛した。
Explain.
伝記の冒頭は狂気だ。借金、父親のグレイハウンドの金を一千五百万〜二千万ドル燃やし、飛行機没収寸前、取締役会に解任され、FBI調査、ラスベガスへ——三十歳で自殺を考えた、と。次の段落は「窓から跳ぶフレッドは荒唐無稽だ。誰かを窓から放り投げる方がまだありそうだ」。ターミネーターのように止まらなかった。
Well, you want you mentioned smart. You want people are honest. You want people hardworking. You want people collegial. You want people are really in it like a like on the work life balance thing and boom, it's work. and their life is a lot their work and and you know that's that they enjoy that and I don't have to
窓から放り投げるイメージは、僕が知る彼にはない。三十歳の頃は少し違ったのかも。輸送・物流ではパッケージ以外で競合だったが、彼は寛大で慈善的で、いつも会ってくれた。家にも来て、何時間も話した。
hold them like a school teacher a stick over their head getting them to work late or come in early work on weekends like they want to do that like they enjoy doing that their job their career their success the collective success of the company is is an important part of their gestalt it's really important part of their being and their purpose was there ever a time I don't mean to be an opportunity you this is fascinating and it's almost selfish to have this conversation because like I get to ask you questions and and learn from you was there ever a time where work wasn't where you were more balanced. When was the last time you were balanced? So, you started your first company at 23.
起業家は、どれだけハードかを知っているから、しばしば驚くほど寛大だ。君が23歳のときに Mr. Jess がそうしたように。サム・ウォルトンは全身に癌があり痛みのなか、最後の時間の多くを六十年の学びの自伝に使った。未来世代への贈り物だ。「もう一つのウォルマートは起きるか?」——「ああ、たぶん今起きている」と。
I did and I've been completely imbalanced since. I've been working seven days a week. Yeah. Very few vacations. You guys scaled like four years to I don't know a couple billion dollars. It was like an insane story.
その精神だ。
For me, it's not work. For me, it's like I'm I'm really enjoying it. To me, it's a craft. It's a skill that I have. Were you enjoying doing it?
カーネギーの自伝で結晶化したテーマがある——事業では常に無駄を見つけ、取り除け。非効率を見つけ、直せ。どの業界のリーダーも、見た目はテック企業でなくてもテクノロジー企業だ。Zara(Inditex)を読むとファッション会社ではなくテクノロジー会社で、GXO Logistics(XPOからスピンオフ)がヨーロッパの倉庫の多くを動かしている。
Were you always honest with yourself that it was the top priority?
フレッドもテクノロジーの人だった。荷物とロボットの新しい発明の話をいつもしていた。
I think so. Yeah. I I had a conversation with a friend of mine uh on the drive over here and um I think I'm lying to myself. So, let me give you example. So, you know, in many cases like you read these biographies of these people and it winds up being a cautionary tale, you know, because they kind of like will sacrifice everything for professional success, their health, their relationships, everything else.
フレッドの伝記の引用——時間について。CEO・エグゼクティブが持つのは時間と資本だけだ、と。洞察は?
Well, that I'm not in favor of.
100%同意する。自分の時間と、組織の人の時間。XPO時代は約十五万人。どう配分するかが仕事だ。
No, no. You you're still married, you're a good father, like everything else. Yeah, for sure. Uh but your main it's not like you have a bunch an abundance of hobbies outside of work from what I understand. But
同時に何にフォーカスしている?
meditation and music was pretty much it.
かなりの数だ。CEOは常に15〜20のことを管理する。人、報酬、予算、調達、顧客、セールス、セールスフォースの卓越——約二十が人生だ。多くのCEOはセールスかオペレーション出身で、得意な四つ〜六つに寄り、残りを委譲しすぎる。価値を生んだCEO——デイヴ・コーティ、エド・ブリーン、ラリー・カルプ——に聞けば、二十すべてに言葉がある。価値を生んでいないCEOは半分も持っていない。
すべてを等しくやるわけではない。人と報酬には特に時間を使う。予算、顧客満足、従業員エンゲージメント、現場のタウンホールとZoom——そこにオールインする。United Rentals と XPO がともに前十年でトップ10の株価パフォーマーだったのは偶然じゃない。同じ原則と構造だ。
quant / PM の友人には言う。経営陣を呼んだら聞け——「五年後の株価はいくらで、そこへ行くレバーは何か?」。「良い質問だ、後で返す」ならその株を買うな、と。CEOが最初に具体的に知らねばならないことだ。現在地、アウトパフォーマンスの目標、利益とマルチプルとフリーキャッシュを改善するレバー。
僕の場合、レバーのグラフの最初の二本が価値の大半を占める。会社を買うこと(支払いの規律。同時に多数の候補を見て一つに惚れない。代替を持つ)と、利益を倍にすることだ。チームと私で500件超の買収をし、深く見たのは何千件もある。
There you go.
買収の話に戻る。500件超を実行し、何千件も深く見た。惚れないために同時に多数を見る、というのはマンガーやバフェットの「一つのディールに恋をするな」にも通じる。価格規律はどこで学んだ?
So I I for a long time every single person I read about I was like okay well I I even titled the episode my personal blueprint which was Ed Thorp, right? Um Ed Thorp I'll give a short run. First uh in first person to invent a quantitative hedge fund. Um he invented you know the the ability to count cards for blackjack. writes this book in the 1960s called Be a Dealer, you know, made more money than he'll ever spend. But if you read his book, you get to the end, it's like he was much more balanced, right? He also came from academia and maybe this had played a role into that, but essentially like lived a life of venture because he truly loved what he did. Uh once he made more money than he could spend, he stopped trading more time for money. Uh he his uh had a good marriage till his wife passed away from cancer. uh took care of his health, but like much more of like a let's say there's five important things and he kind of like divvied up maybe like work was 50% but the other four are other 50%. And I was like oh that's that's kind of my personal blueprint. And I said on the drive I go no I'm lying. It's like 90% of what I think about and how I spend my time is just work.
何度も失敗して学んだ。高すぎる値段で買うと、そのあとの三年で利益を倍にしても、入り口のマルチプルで価値が消える。だから「妥当なら全力、高すぎたらやらない」。安く奪う必要はないが、規律は絶対だ。月曜朝七時に発表して、市場が「割安で買った」と認識するスプレッドが、最初のアルファだ。
That's a beautiful thing. So, all the people you've mentioned so far, all these very very successful people,
オーガニック成長とマージン拡大の二本柱以外に、テックはどう位置づける? 業界は「テックフォワードではない」と言いつつ、テックはツールキットの中核に見える。
I guarantee you probably every single one of them, with few exceptions, if any, were all in and what what they were doing was their passion and they were just so excited about it. They were in the flow. They were in the flow of being so absorbed on something that you'd like lose track of time and the whole rest of the universe is gone. You're just you're just in it. you're just really into something that you do well and you're with people that you really like and you're likely to be successful because you're you're doing what you do. When I was thinking about the amount of research that you do that you explain when you before you get into an industry, before you start a company, it's like the way I describe your book is buy it, read it all the way through and then what I really think it is, you put it close to your desk because it's a reference manual because you can just pick this up now and read one chapter that takes 10 minutes and get good ideas out of it. Do you know I'm writing a sequel?
テックは手段だ。情報を探す時間を減らし、売る時間と決める時間を増やす。価格のアルゴリズム、弾力性、在庫、ルート、倉庫——業界ごとに磨くが、原理は同じだ。AIで根こそぎ破壊される業界は選ばない。だが、既存の重い業界にテックを流し込む余地は大きい。Zara がファッションではなくテックに見えるのと同じで、我々の物流・流通もオペレーションとテックの会社だ。
Last time you told me it's like I only had one book in me. I have nothing else. So, I wrote the book and I got so much feedback of what people thought about it and people asked, "Well, you should really talk more about this and this this." At first, I said, "I'm never writing another book." Takes a lot takes a lot of time to write a book and I don't have a lot of time. But
時間管理——注意散漫な時代に、どう優先以外に引きずられない? バフェットは「月曜は一件、火曜はなし、水曜はなし」とカレンダーをコントロールし、断る。僕はノーが苦手だから聞いている。君は世界で最も有名で裕福な層の一人で、時間が欲しい人が山ほどいる。どう「ノー」を学んだ? 若い頃から?
I had so many people ask me similar questions. Okay, I'm going to write a sequel that addresses those particular questions. You know what the title's going to be?
問題を認識したのは解決の半分だ。あとは実行だ。本当に成功する人はほとんどすべてにノーと言う、という格言もある。僕は自分が思っているほど有名でも世界最富裕でもないが、自分のやり方で、ビジネスコミュニティでは知られている。平均的な有名人とは違うが、そこだけが気になるコミュニティだ。
時間管理はチーフ・オブ・スタッフがいる。かつては大統領執務室で、世界で最も重要な人のカレンダーを管理していた。それ以上に、僕の優先を理解している。競合より良いオーガニック成長とマージン拡大——この二つをやれば株主価値が大きく出る。そのためには人とテックと各種レバーに集中する。月曜朝七時、買収発表後に自社の利益マルチプルより安い価格で買えていれば、すでにアルファだ。三〜五年で利益を倍にすればさらに。彼はゲートキーパーとして、重要でないものを止める。周りも、ポッドキャストに時間を使いすぎたら叱るだろう。
That was how to make a few billion dollars. This one's going to be called How to Make a Few More Billion Dollars. [laughter]
やってくれてありがとう。本で達したこと、僕が増幅しようとするのも、生きた経験から何百万人もが学べることだ。四十年近い起業家経験——やめた人や失敗した人の方が多いなかで、教えることが山ほどある。
Is that great award?
時間の話で——昔よく使っていた言葉がある。WATWAM。Waste of Time, Waste of Money。ブレインストームで「WATWAM」と言える。みんな笑う。
Yes. Let me get an early copy, please. you were very nice to send me another copy of this one. Uh, but the what I think what ties all this together when I think about your research process, the way you go after life, all the people we've been talking about from Steve Jobs to Jeff Bezos, this is like mediocrity is always invisible until passion shows up and exposes it.
hilarious だ。周りにもそれを言える人がいるのがいい。一人で100%は無理だ。フレッドも時間管理は brutal——絶対的に brutal だと言った。フレッドの引用で、君を思い出した一文がある。「自己否定と自己改善なしにビジネスで勝とうとする者は、集中訓練なしにリングに立つボクサーのようなものだ。勝つ精神を伴う天賦の才でも、決して十分ではない」。23歳の君と、七つ目・八つ目の会社の君では、学んだ量で前の自分を殴り倒せる。
Love it.
経験で上手くなる。でも原則はだいたい同じだ。素晴らしい人。互いに殺し合わず競合を倒すルール・オブ・エンゲージメント。公正な報酬で全員がゲームに入る。
I think that is what animates me is just like
インセンティブの力に気づいたのはいつ? 本でも報酬・インセンティブを繰り返す。
you you see this you're talking about like even when you buy great companies, good companies, so like what else could you do? It's like there's always more because you can always infuse passion into what you're doing, obsession, work with the best people. Of course, you can keep getting better and better results.
非常に早い。石油ブローカーの頃、十人テーブルで毎月ボーナスプールの貢献度を各自に聞き、合計するといつも300%になった。難しい会話が必要だった。「貢献を膨らませている」と。気づいたのは、人は僕を愛して来るのではなく、自分と家族のために金を稼ぐために来る、ということだ。theory of mind——相手の動機を理解すること——がディールにも報酬にもチームにも顧客にもベンダーにも効く。自分の頭のなかだけで「これが欲しい、押し通す」では、相手は舌を出して去る。パートナーシップで、共に世界を取りに行く取引をし続ける。
トップ層には大量のエクイティを五年ロックで渡す、と先ほど言った。CHROと月二回、株価50・75・100ドルのときのエクイティ価値のスプレッドシートを見る。「この人には働くものがある」「報酬をミスった、トップアップが要るかも」「与えすぎた(取り戻せないが)」——少なくとも皆の頭のなかがわかる。ラジオ局は WIIFM——What's In It For Me。人は自分を気にする。それが資本主義で、自由市場で、良いことだ。
Yeah. Well, I agree with that. I think so what you just said, you buy a company, it's doing very well, and then three or four years later, you've doubled the profit. What did you do? You went in with a toolkit and you went into the attack the pricing using algorithms and elasticity analysis. You've tacked the compensation. So, you've got the sales people made partners rather than pupils to the the parent authoritarian figure at corporate. You put in technology that frees up time that allows people to spend time doing selling and doing their job rather than trying to find information. You're sharing information in very good ways. So you apply a certain toolkit. Boom. You double profit. So wait a minute. This brings up something interesting that I've been talking about lately. The different archetypes there is in founders and CEOs, right? Everybody thinks like, oh, there's kind of one archetype and especially the ones that are popularized now, it's like essentially like the Steve Jobs dictator make, you know, almost all the decisions.
ネガティブだとは思わない。みんな自己中心的だ。本の一文——十五万人が世界中にいても、「文化が違う」と言われるが、金はどこでも人を動かす。彼らはブラッド・ジェイコブズをもっと豊かにするために来ているのではない。家族のために来ている。
公開市場へのこだわりともつながる。本で、自分だけでなく教師や年金、看護師、消防士のために富を築いた誇り——自分より大きなミッション——を書いていた。完全に利己的なら、とっくに止まっている。ベゾスは「世界で最も顧客中心の会社」を、長期では顧客と株主の利益を完全に揃えられる例として示した。僕も、子供が誇れるよう何かを追い、情熱を持ち、他者にとって良くなるものを作りたい。そうすれば家族も潤う。本の好きな部分のひとつだ。
昨夜、共通の友人パトリック・オショネシーと夕食して、今朝「ブラッドに100%と言っといて」とテキストが来た。数ヶ月前の朝食にもいた。人生で最も印象的な会社は何か、と話した。80年代生まれの我々にとって、90年代創業なら Amazon(97年)だ、と。Microsoft は70年代で「我々の前」になる。
本を読み、インタビューを聴き、今話して、自己設定の天井が外れる。ブラッドには達成の限界がないように見える。大きなスケールで自動的に考える。富を増やし会社を伸ばすなら、奉仕する顧客を増やせばいい——単純だが、見えない天井が邪魔する。
エピソードも本も、締めはこの引用がいい。八年生の夏、ロードアイランド州の芸術・音楽のギフテッド向けサマースクール。最初の夜、リーダーのスピーチに鳥肌が立った。「これは特別な機会だ。活かすかどうかは君たち次第だ。無駄にして何も成し遂げないこともできる。オールインすることもできる。深いプロジェクトでこれまでで最高の仕事をする機会だ。欲しければ決めろ」。集中の強度と結果の魔法のつながりを学んだ。心と魂を全部入れれば、本当にクールなものを作れる自分がいた、と。情熱とオールインと、聞いている人への助言。
I don't like that.
いま鳥肌を再体験している。物理的にピリピリする。人生の決定的な瞬間だった。自分次第だとわかった。人生を惰性で歩き眠り、死ぬこともできる。あるいは生きる。人生を抱きしめ、大きな夢を持ち、オールインし、情熱を見つける——多くの人にとってそれはビジネスや金ではないが、何であれ——そして素晴らしい何かを成し遂げる。それが大きな動機だ。
Yeah. So exactly. I just heard the pupil part.
ここで終わるのが完璧だ。本を書いてくれてありがとう。時間をくれてありがとう、ブラッド。本当に尊敬している。多くを学んだ。いま友人と呼べることが、謙虚で特権的だ。ありがとう。
Who am I to criticize Steve Ch. I wouldn't be able to do that. So you want to get the right people in place. You want to get the compensation aligned. And then you want to be communicating with each other in a very constructive way and a very prolific way. So, Friday, we had our our second mo monthly operating review for this company we had bought, Beacon. And how did we come up with the agenda? It was 10-hour meeting, two breaks. One was 10 minutes, one was 5 minutes. Nobody was distracted. Nobody's on phones or devices. So, it was all shut off. We're very concentrating on the one person that had the the the the mic the proverbial microphone at a time and listening very carefully and intently what that person was saying and then debating each point and each action point. How did we come up with the agenda? Here's how. Did I, the CEO, come from above and say, "Here's the agenda that I think is the important thing. I'm smarter than all of you, and here's what we should be doing." No. How pompous and arrogant and kind of ineffective really to do that. What I do is just the opposite. How many people would be in a meeting like that? Two questions on that. How what percent of the meeting are you speaking in a a situation like that? So I open up usually and I ramble on for like an hour or maybe even more than an hour of the state of the union from from my perspective and I try not to just mention things that I form conclusions on but I try to frame things of these are the most important successes of the company but these are the things where we need to improve and here are the issues that in my view after reading everybody's rep votes and everything I think are the things we should attention direct we should spend most amount of time solving because I think those will create the most amount ount of value and and I I try to keep it balanced the good stuff and the bad stuff. Yes, I do add of boys and of girls and rahrhas. That's that's good thing to do for leadership. But I in equal measure do look, we got to keep it real. We got to keep it honest. Here's things that we said by this deadline we're going to do it. We're we're a couple weeks behind on this. Let's get going here. What's going on? Here's we thought this outcome was going to happen and we're only 92% there. How can we get to 100%. So I try to shut start off with a balance but then I try to shut up and then I try to let the mechan the mechanical going through the questions where I just go down the questions by categories and then go around the room and hear everyone's opinion and that's that's you don't want the leader talking a huge amount of time. everyone else everyone else Yeah. This is one of the things I felt and I've seen this with a lot with like really remarkable people is how many people like when we had this intense breakfast at your house a few months ago, great company. standing her way. Yes. that especially when companies get big and older, they don't they stop asking information from from people from the front lines. So here you're like often when we buy a company we discover that the frontline employees, middle managers and even some senior executives have never been asked what would you what would you do to improve the company? You would think owners would want to know that and then you have this great thing that I think is actually good for business but also personal relationships. You ask what is the the stupidest thing we're doing and what is the smartest thing you were doing. So, at the end of those operating reviews, once we've gone through all the lists, now we now we do human interactions. That's where the fun starts. So, we work really hard going solving all these problems and debating all these issues. Now, we put that aside and I ask a series of questions. I modify them a little bit every month, but I have a list of few dozen questions. I pick which ones I want to ask each time. Usually one of the first ones is what is something somebody said today that you have a different opinion on? What is something that somebody said you disagree with and you get a chance to talk about it? I just go around one by one to each person. That's a wonderful thing. Many management teams can't do that because everyone will get upset. Yeah. validating the field and then I bring it inwards and I say who around this table today in your mind did their star go up the already might have been high because everyone loves each other but even higher you and why what is something that somebody said today in the meeting that impressed you that made you go aha made you say damn that's a good insight that's a good perception I really like that what who was it and what did they say we go around everything like that and I have a few other questions like that and then I bring it down to the person themselves and I say finish the sentence I resolve to improve the company by just go one by one and each person stands up and says, "I resolved to improve the company by" and then they say what they what what what's what what they want to say. It's a great thing. What I didn't get a chance to do Friday because we ran out of time. What I often do is then we go into the another room. We get out of the boardroom, get out of the conference room, and then we stand in a circle and just silently look at each other with for the first couple minutes. A couple minutes is a long time to be like looking around everybody else. It's, you know, it's a lot of people that's uncomfortable. It's not uncomfortable if you all like each other. How much of is of your the way you run your company is like guided by intuition? Like you seem like a very intuitive person to me. not well. Yes, there's always instinct. There's always intuition. You you're always going by your gut, So I've experimented over time. Okay. And just keeping the information flowing through the company. There's a idea that I think when when I thought of um your ideas like hey we're going to buy the company we're going to ask like what would you do if you were running the company? What's the stupidest thing we're doing? What's the smartest thing we're doing? I as you know like very I'm not interested I'm interested in timeless principles not timely. Right. And when I read that in your book what I thought of was not you building your company. I thought of Jim Casey building UPS 100 years ago. And what he learned because a lot of these things that these ideas that survived for a long period of time, they're not dependent on the company really depend on human nature cuz like history doesn't repeat human nature does, right? Human nature is kind of constant. Doesn't really change. And so what Jim realizes the more successful he became, the more successful his company became. His executives their incentives were to like hide the bad news and just tell them good things because then it's like everything is great in the company, Jim. And so like and I was the one that made that great and so pay me more and like make sure I keep this great job I have. And Jim realizes like, "Oh, I need to have constant unfiltered access from the people that are delivering the the service to my customers." So he would he would do is like he would he would instruct his driver every time we see a brown UPS truck, you were to pull over and he would get out, no matter how successful it was, and he would talk to the driver. Unfiltered information. Same thing. People would go and they try to meet Sam Walton in Bentonville, Arkansas, right? So Todd Combmes is one of Warren Buffett's managers. I don't know 10 years ago, 8 nine 10 years ago This is why I'm so obsessed with what I'm doing because what like nothing we're doing is new. Like you had all these people that ran all these kind of experiments for centuries and they built great companies and just because you know they passed on and maybe the company's not around anymore. It's like there's so there's a treasure trove of data in there. So like uh the Bezos idea I love where he would publicize he used to publicize the very early days of Amazon. jeff amazon.com email me and he read part of the one of the reasons that he figured out he's like oh I I can we can't just sell books like I can sell anything people he'd be like he would send emails to I think like the top thousand customers like what else would you buy and one guy he had this epiphany cuz you yeah you know they like hey I want toilet paper I want you know groceries whatever one guy's like I want windshield wipers I'm going to be able to sell everything like it is a true everything store but I was uh I was thinking about this recently because I just read this book translated from French about the Michelin family dynasty which starts out in 1891 selling tires in France. You're selling tires. There's like 350 cars on the road for God's sake. But there's a line in the book that is related to all this where they start the the the two brothers have to take over this failing uh factory and they don't know what to to make because most of the products that they're manufacturing are unprofitable. They're under bankruptcy. They're one profitable um product which so they eliminate everything else and they focus on the one profitable product which is a rubber brake pad for horserawn carriages. Say that again though. And so it takes them like a year or two to figure out like hey we should manufacture rubber and there's two twin phenomenon. You're talking about get remember what Justin said get the major trend right. Yeah. Yes. completely. All the different constituents in an organization need to be talking to each other, need to have feedback loops to know how they're doing. If you're not asking your customers how you're doing, you may think you're doing a lot better than you than you than you really are or Do you like the um you have this great line in your book where it says uh I love working with outrageously talented people to deliver outside returns for shareholders in public stock markets. You this constant feedback from the public market. You love it. you're in a you're just in a bubble chamber, echo chamber. You're just hearing your own thoughts instead of others. You want people challenging your thoughts all the time. I love being public. Well, they have to be at a level of maturity of the company to go public. They have to be preferably profitable. Yeah. Yeah. That are that reach that criteria and are choosing not to. I think people think Yeah. I I can't speak for them, but I think they're like maybe the scared of the public scrutiny, the hassle, the but that goes back to what we were talking about an hour ago is so they might have a core belief saying I need everybody to always be like saying great stuff about me which is never going to happen and they may think that gee if I go public when you're public at any moment in time you have people in favor of you and people who are naysayers. You have people who are selling and buying. The people are selling think you're overvalued. people are buying get the joke and they understand you have a real real business plan here that's going to create more much more value. So you always have those two different things going. Maybe those people don't want to hear the naysayers. Maybe those people don't understand that naysayers sometimes can help you correct your own path. Can tell you, gee, you know, maybe I'm cutting cost too much. People come in and say, you're cutting cost too much. I visited one of your locations. I didn't think the service was so great. Oh, wow. I didn't know that. Thank you for telling me that. So now I have to invest more rather than cut costs. You have other people who say, you know, I'm looking at your numbers here. Your margins are growing, which is great. That's only half the half the situation here. The other situation is what are you doing with your top line? What are you doing with your price and volume? What are you doing with your organic growth? In my business, in all my businesses, the only two things I had to do in the end in order to get great valuations and create shareholder value were grow the top line faster than the competition, faster than the market, Explain that part. Was there ever a time in your career you're like, maybe I should do should do a a private company instead or you were pretty much all in on it? You said something interesting. I like the pressure. What do you mean by that? I think that's so important to like put that out. Um cuz we were talking about the negative selft talk and like you know just living a a pretty crazy life where it's like you want to work seven days a week or you're just completely allin and the way some again this goes back to you can hear a sentence and just be like oh I feel that way too and it kind of changes the way you approach things. And I remember reading about Herb Keller, which is the founder of Southwest Airlines. You know, it's such a it's such a crazy story that like in an industry where bankruptcy is the most common, you know, outcome. The guy had his his company was profitable for 40 straight years, which is nuts. And he's like a nut job. He's drinking a fifth of bourbon every day. He's chain smoking cigarettes. No, no, no. He's like, I don't advocate that. Yeah, This is He was an attorney. He didn't start his company. It was his first company. He was an attorney until he was 35 years old. And he's like, "Hey, I'm going to try to do an interstate or intrastate airline." And like then he he had it was like four years of legal fights before he could even take his first flight. He's just like, "I love this … This is what I want. I want the pressure Um, I read his biography uh probably like four or five years ago and tell me if I'm wrong, you know more about this industry than I do. It seems like FedEx had to be one of the most difficult operational companies to ever invent like an unbelievable talking about somebody wanted pressure. So Fred endorsed my book. And I was very touched he did that. He he was a competitor literally Wall Street competitor to endorse my book. I mean this is a very special you meet people in life that are just special that are certain integrity that I and I was in Atlanta at the National Association of Manufacturers, the NAM conference, and Fred was the keynote. So I I was in the audience watching him and somebody um said, "What do you think of Brad Jacobs?" I go, "Oh my god." My heart starts beating. [laughter] Oh my god, Fred Smith's about to like destroy me. My brand is going to be completely crushed. you know the icon of the industry is going to say oh yeah I don't believe he's really he said I really like watching that guy work he said he is coming into this industry with courage and buying things left and right and has big goals and big ambitions and I'm I'm going to keep an eye on that guy and I I would I cried I said wow Fred Smith like saying great stuff so I went up to him afterwards after the the speech was over and I said Mr. Smith, uh, Brad Jacobs. I really appreciate what you said. I said, "Well, first of all, I'm Fred [laughter] Robert Smith." And that was the beginning of a great great friendship. And we got together many, many times. Of course, he was on the business council. He was the longest serving member of the business council over a quarter of a century. And I go to every business council meeting I possibly can to meet other CEOs and to hear what other people are thinking. It was just a generous guy. This was a guy who had vision. He had passion. Talk about grit. I mean, he woring around all the time everywhere. Vietnam. He was decorate. He was He was flying helicopters with people shooting bullets at him to go get Marines who had been He was a Marine. Yeah. The opening paragraph of that of his biography is the craziest opening paragraph I ever heard. I'm just going to like paraphrase it. Essentially like, you know, he's in debt. Um, he ran through like his the his Greyhound his dad's Greyhound bus millions. I think he burned through like 15 or 20 million. Uh, his planes are about to be confiscated. They just got fired by his board. Uh the FBI is in uh investigating him. Yes. And then they're like he thought uh he he thought he was like 30 years old at the time, so still young, but he refused to let his Federal Express dream die. And the line was just like he thought of suicide. And then the next paragraph is like but the idea of thread of Fred jumping out a window is ludicrous. He's more likely to throw somebody out of a window. [laughter] He's just like a guy that you like he was like the Terminator. You couldn't stop uh like he just wouldn't stop coming. There's a few lines. I mean, I was Well, maybe. Yeah. But I was a direct competitor of him in transportation and logistics and pretty not in package. We didn't do package, but pretty much all the other lines of business, we compete against him. This is what is so special. I know it's part of humanity in general, but entrepreneurship and in in particular is just it's like you see this over and over again just how generous these people are with cuz they know how … hard it is. They just went through all this and now we might be 15 20 30 years different in age. But it's like just like Lew did when you were 23. And in many cases like what you did with the book like the idea like think about Sam Walton, right? He wrote his autobiography. His cancer was all over his body. He was in pain. He knows his time is towards the end and what does he do? He spends a a a big chunk of the last time he had left saying this is what I learned in my six decade long career. That is a gift to future generations. And then in the book they're like somebody I love this part cuz they're in the book they're like uh people ask me all the time could another Walmart story happen. He's like yeah it's probably happening right now. And it was Jeff Bezos going around with his copy of the book writing it annotating it giving it to the executives the early executives of Amazon. It's such a beautiful thing that Fred would do that. It's what a beautiful thing what you did uh for your book. No, no, no. I'm saying but like in general. Yeah, obviously. Well, yeah, I see why. But my point being is the the transfer of even for competitors. He was Fred was your competitor, but he's transferring knowledge to you. That is Exactly. You hear stories like that all the time in private and for you to say that I think it's really important. There's a few things I pulled out from his biography that just remind me of you and I'm curious if like you if you agree with some of these things. One, uh, the amount Okay. Well, perfect. The amount of information. So, like think about it. Like he started in Fredex in 60s, I think, something like that. No, after Vietnam, so maybe early 70s, but in the 80s, he says that he estimated in during the 1980s, he spent four hours a day reading. He says uh he found he relied quite heavily on his own vision backed by assimilating information which you've mentioned multiple times so far from many different disciplines at once. You've talked about in meetings, you talked about in trade journals, you talked about all the research you do, right? This is his quote though that I want to read to you. The common trait of people who supposedly have vision is they spend a lot of time reading and gathering information and then synthesize it until they come up with an idea. That sounds like you to me. But you're also like alive. The way to describe is like you're you're also alive and paying attention. Like the story in your book where you're like reading a magazine in bed on a Sunday morning and you read about like uh these waste management companies making like $500 million in profit. They're like, "Whoa, what?" Like, they're picking up trash from one spot and bring it to another. I need to learn about this industry. But that's my point is like you're you're people like Fred, people like you. I think you know there's a ton of people that have the same thing where it's like there the whole world is like a classroom if you're actually paying attention like you can pick up we ideas all over the place. So the waste management business I contrasted to the oil business. The oil business is a lot more complex. We're negotiating complicated long-term contracts and chartering vessels and negotiating processing agreements with big major oil companies and hedging and I it's very very complicated complex business. When I read that about the garbage business, I said that that is so much easier picking up [laughter] that's a simple business and move some garbage and send out an invoice. I definitely think I can do that and it seems like they make a lot of money and the trend seemed seemed in the right direction. So yeah, you So I got that from Kurtzwell by the way. Ray Kerszswwell. So Ray Ray so Ray Kurszswwell huge mentor of mine. Only met him once, met him for about six hours. But was amazing where it was a chronology of the universe going you know my meditation I go back to space and time said and the the opportunity to always do something slightly better which is and invent tools that to do so technology it even starts out when you were talking about collecting but the the good thing is like this is not exclusive to the time we live in it's a constant throughout our experience like you can you can go and look at the like when you guys were um collecting all this is you said before fax before email you were collecting all the information for amorex the way I thought about this is really um crystallized my mind when I read Andrew Carneg's autobiography right which is probably written 130 years ago and for whatever reason if you talk to somebody today they don't think of like the production of steel as techn technology, which is like a crazy thing. At the time, it was like they literally invented a new and a better way and then everything in the world was going to be made out of this. And so what I do is like when I'm finished reading a book, again, we go back to to this idea that you and I share. We have to like distill it. You're not going to remember 250 pages, but you'll remember a paragraph or a sentence if you can. And Andrew is a young person getting into an existing industry. It's a new industry, but still existing industry. most of his competitors were much older and they were very resistant to your point resistant to change. You have to embrace the major trend which is what your your mentor told you. And so I was hearing the the the criticism that his competitors almost like uh when you were in that business and um they the the guy took you out to lunch. It's like slow down. I used to be the first now I'm the second. That's that's a terrible way to to do business. It's like take your competitor out to lunch and be like stop being better than me. Yeah, it's not going to work. But the the way I would summarize the main theme from Andrew Carnegie's book that then reappears over and over again in these stories is invest in technology. The savings compound. It can give you an advantage over slower moving competitors and can be the difference between a profit and a loss. And you see that over and over and over again. It doesn't matter if it's steel, waste management, software over and over again. It's like the the best entrepreneurs, the best CEOs, the best executives, they're you they're not scared of technology. If you're scared of it, you're going to get destroyed by it. They embrace it and they invest heavily in it. And again, uh the benefit I have is like I'm reading about a chocolate company that was started 80 years ago and they have some of the most advanced robots making chocolate. I'm reading about a tire company from 150 years ago. They watch their costs and they're very efficient on in how they spend their uh their time and their money, but they invest heavily in technology. No one thinks of Walmart as a technology company, but if you go back in 1979, right? He's Sam's in his 60s and they're like, "Hey, we're doing everything by hand. Our business is way getting way too complex. We have all these distribution centers. Think about the logistics. You would know all this. Moving all this material where it needs to be at the right time. we need to invest in computers. And Sam at first saw he heard computer, he heard overhead, he heard expense. I can't do that. And then he was slowly allowed himself to be convinced by the talents of people on his team. And he wind up in when he when he decided to invest, he didn't like dabble. He invested $500 million in 1979, who knows what that would be today, in the most advanced computer system to handle his logistics and distribution. And that was an edge that no not not another retailer on the planet had or at least in America had that but he had the technological edge over the rest of his competitors. I would argue that if anybody there I don't think you could be the leader in any industry and not also we don't think of them as tech companies because we think tech has to be like Google or Facebook. It's like no they're all tech companies. I just did um I wanted to do more than just uh like American entrepreneurs is where because you know the when you have an outside share of entrepreneurs is H&M Oh Zara Index So Zar Index is a big customer of GXO Logistics, one of the companies we spun off from XPO and GXO runs a lot of their warehouses in Europe and it's it's exactly what you're saying. It's it's e-commerce. It's trying to do things very efficiently and very quickly and very accurately. And you need technology to do that. You need robots and you need AI. Every business every single business is going to see more automation and more AI. People have to get on the program on that or they're going to be dinosaurs. Fred was an attack. Yeah, of course. In a big way. Yes. So there's something we haven't touched on. I have a question for you and this is a quote from Fred in his biography. He says you have to be absolutely brutal in the management of your time. Do you have any insight? So time. So when you're a CEO, when you're an executive, you only got two things. You got time and you got capital. and how you deploy that time and how you deploy that capital equals results. So it's your it's your time and it's the time of the people of the organization. So when I was running XPO, we had about 150,000 a little more employees worldwide. See each one of those worker the senior manager worked long long hours but the average worker worked eight hours a day. So you had eight times about 1.2 million hours a day of of work getting done. If you've got people very focused and very motivated and very well trained and feel good about the company and feel good about their job, that productivity of that 1.2 million hours a day is going to be a lot more than if they're if the conditions I just mentioned are not are not present. So managing people's time f putting them in the right priorities and and telling ranking what people should be spending their time on is very very very important to success. Now how do I spend my time? I spend my time deliberately and consciously and intentionally on the things that I think make most amount of value for the for the company. No, a fair amount. So, if you're CEO, you're you're managing, you know, 15 20 different things always. You're managing people, you manage technology, you're managing budgets, you're managing investors, you're managing uh infrastructure, you're managing transportation, you're managing logistics, you're managing pricing, you're managing procurement with the vendors, you're managing customer relations, you're managing sales. There's you manage salesforce excellence. I mean, it's just there's about 20 things that are your life. Like that's what a C that's what a good CEO does. The problem with a lot of CEOs is they've come up through just sales or operations and they're good at that, but they kind of just delegate the other 15 things. That's really part of the CEO job. You look at the great CEOs, the the CEOs have created a lot of alpha, a lot of shareholder value. They've been in each one of those 20 or so things. You talk to a Dave Cody, you talk to an Ed Breen, you talk to Larry Culp, you can talk about any of those 20 things and they have they have things to say and you can learn from them. You talk to CEOs who haven't created a lot of value, who not really good at this game, they'll know four or five or six or even half of those 20 things, but they don't do the other. They don't do the other part. You got to be in all of them. But but you're not in all those things in equal measure. Some things you don't have to spend as much time on. The people things and compensation things I actually spend a lot of time on. So that's that's core. That's critical to get right. That's that's something that if you get wrong, you you waste budgeting. I spend a lot of time going on the budget. customer satisfaction. I spent a lot of time on that. The employee ser the employee engagements, going out to the field, doing the town halls, doing the Zooms, I'm I'm all in on that. Yeah. They're they're they're not they're they're afraid to do the inet are making generalizations. There's always exceptions, but generally speaking, what I find is they gravitate to the stuff they like and that they're good at and they kind of just don't do the stuff that they don't like or they don't aren't very good at. And you can't you've got to you've got to be if you want to be a good CEO and have a high performing performing company and be the top and be in the top desile of of stock performance like like United Rentals and XPO were both top 10 stock performers last decade. That's not random that the both those companies were because it was the same same principles, same same structures. You've got to have CEOs and they they did where that are in the whole thing and understand from A to Z what running a business is and how you create shareholder value and see the whole picture of the levers. So I always tell friends who are port and I have a lot of friends who are portfolio managers or analysts at on the buy side. I said, 'When you bring a management team in, you need to ask them, "What's your stock price going to be five years from now? And what are the levers that I have to believe that's going to get you there?" And if that CEO tells you, "I'll get that's a great question. I'll get back to you." Short that stock or at least don't buy that stock because that's the first thing the CEO has to know. First thing a C a CEO and the senior management team has to know with great specificity. Here's where we are right now. on the stock price. We want to get massive outperformance and get to here. That's great. That's just the beginning. Here are the levers of how I get there. Here are the levers of the things that we must do as an organization that will improve our profitability, improve our multiple, generate free cash flow. Just how are we going to get to there? And in my case, it's not that hard because when you do the the the graph, how what's the distribution there? So you've done over 500 acquisitions throughout your Yeah. You and your team for sure. Thousands and thousands. I mean many thousands. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Going back to the time management though, I think especially in like the age that people are growing up in like where I like there's a shorten shortened attention span, a lack of focus in my opinion and like really easy to give into distraction. Like how you sound like you're almost not impervious to distraction. That's not the right way to put it because I know how you're you're going to be humble when you describe yourself, but how do you avoid being pulled into things that are not prioritized? And he says, "Mday I have one appointment. Tuesday, I have no appointments." Wednesday, I have no appointments. Because he controls his time. He controls his time. And he he has no problem saying no and refusing people time. It's a very Well, you can solve that problem. That's a problem you've identified. That's great. That's half of the solution of the problem. Now you need to work on. He has that great line where he's like the difference between successful people and really successful people is really successful people say no to almost everything. So like you have 20 you know whatever the number Yeah. So whatever the number is like you have 20 things that that you know you're you're focused on at the co level at this moment. You're you know you know where you want to spend your time, what you're best at. We talked about incentives and and then recruiting talent, but like you also are one of the most and you're not going to like this, but like one of the most famous and wealthiest people in the world. You have an unbelievable amount of people that want your time. How do you stay discip Like you you seem to be disciplined from the outside of saying no to a lot of things. Like how is that something you learned in the last like five years, 10 years? Were you like that when you were younger? in the business community. No, the average Yeah, for sure. You should see my inbox when it comes to you. But that's fine. That's fine. It's funny because people This is why every time I say these things to you, you say say No, it's it's it's a smart move. But the the funny thing is when I did the I had breakfast with Brad Jacobs episode now people were like flooded like can you introduce like no like you had to figure out how to get to him yourself like this you can't. I was looking for my next thing. and I was looking at asset management Yeah. and uh I you know I think he'd return my call if I called him. no not yet I did you should you definitely should I want to meet him I want to meet him so if you can introduce me please he's inc the so this is the good thing about when I do remember most of the people I study are dead when I do episodes on people that are living this is why I was asking some of the questions because like I'll do this episode it reaches a very valuable community and they're really helpful and then I get all these crazy stories about this guy's even more remarkable than your episode. It's like and I got it about you and I got it about Ken and then I was like oh I got it like I definitely want to meet Ken. He's a very fascinating person. and more importantly he understands what I'm doing. He understands my my priorities and he understands what I was talking to you before like the two most important things that I got to do are have organic revenue growth better than the competition and a margin expansion and everything falls. He understands that. He understands that in order to do that I have to focus on people. I have to focus on technology. He understands the different levers to do that. He Yeah. That's my framework in business. My framework is because I've learned if I do those two things and it takes a hundred different things to do those two things well. But if I do those two things well, I will create dramatic shareholder value. If I buy companies at significant lower multiples of profit than I trade at Monday morning at 7 o'clock after we announce the acquisition, I've already created alpha for my shareholders. That's a nice way to start the week. Number two, if I then double the the profit over the next three to five years, then I'll get a nice multiple and if I generate th those are the two main things I need to focus on. He understands that. Now, what he also understands is all the components because, you know, in the monthly operating reviews and all the correspondents, we're very we're very good at communicating with each other what's important and what's not important. So, he knows my my priorities and therefore he's a great gatekeeper. Is there anybody that could tell you when you're getting off track from what you professed to say? Dude, you're the man for doing this by the way. And it will also get to like I I do think, you know, one of the things that you obviously accomplished with the book and like I try to help amplify with my work. It's like there's millions of people are going to benefit from your lived experience. you you have 40 50 almost 50 years let's say 40 years of experience as an entrepreneur it's like how many people that have ever lived life that have done that most people you know they unfortunately they quit or they fail whatever the case is like you have so much to teach the world can I comment on something about the time there's a phrase I used to use and I you brought it out of me so I'm going to start using again I haven't used it recently is watwam okay and I'm so glad first of It's hilarious. I'm glad that you you said that you actually have other people around you doing this, too, cuz I I am kind of skeptical that no human can can hit their goals and what they want to do, you know, 100% of the time. I can't imagine, you know, the complexity of running FedEx and this guy is just like, "No, you have to be brutal. There's a word like that." He picks it absolutely brutal is the word. Absolutely brutal in your time management. Yeah. I think there's a lot of things. There's another thing that Fred Smith said um that again like when I'm reading about Fred when I was going through and rereading all my highlights from his biography, I wasn't really thinking about Fred. I was thinking about you. You know, like this to me feels like a lot of what I've learned from you. And this is a direct quote from Fred. He says, "I believe that a man who expects to win out in business without self-denial and self-improvement stands as about as much a chance as a price fighter would stand if he started a ring battle without having gone through intensive training. natural ability even when accompanied by the spirit to win is never sufficient. If I look at the way you were building businesses when you were 23 compared to you know you can pick first million dollar company then you look at the second or the third or the fourth or the fifth or the seventh it's like you're not even like you'd go back and kick that dude's ass because of all the stuff you have learned since then. When did you kept repeating that? When did you understand the power of incentives? Because you talk about compensation incentives a lot. Remember I told you a few minutes ago that I give everyone on the top level of the company bunch of equity. Yeah. But it's locked up for five years. they don't care about you and me, David. they care about them, which is normal. That's that's that's capitalism. That's free markets. That's a good thing. their families. I love this idea of I think it's really important to have a I think it's tied to your obsession with like the public markets too and what you said in your book about being very proud of building wealth not just for yourself but for school teachers, pension plans, nurses, firemen and everything else is like the the importance of having a um a mission bigger than yourself. I think like if you just live a completely selfish life, first of all, you would have stopped way a long time ago. Like you didn't need to and in general people you wouldn't have to do this. Um, and I've seen this in a couple different places where like um, Jeff Bezos, we talked about him a few times today where his idea was when he started Amazon, he's like, I want to be build the world's most customer- ccentric company. So, I want to be an example not just to our employees and our customers, but to other companies to see look how you can over the long term you can align the interests of the customer and the shareholder perfectly aligned. They just have to be done so over the extremely long term. But this idea of like going it drives me. is like I want to build wealth, you know, so my kids are proud of me and like and and I show them like what it's like to like chase after something and be deeply committed to it and be passionate about and love it and also make something that's better for other people. And if you do that automatically, you know, the family will prosper and everything else. So I think that's like I think I love that was one of my favorite parts of um of your book. Do something about something about workplace great workplace environment or something like that the best workplace environment in the world or um and we were having this discussion at dinner uh with his family I was like what is the most impressive company built in our lifetime. And so me and him were born in the 80s cuz he's like, "What about Microsoft? Microsoft is in the 70s like before us." And I would say it's like for me the answer is like Amazon like started in 97. I can't think of another company started in the '90s like in terms of like as impressive as as a big success story by reading your book, listening to your interviews, talking to you now, you kind of for for me personally like you kind of remove any self-imposed limit that I have where I'm like, oh, like there's no I don't think Brad has a limit to what he thinks he can achieve. He thinks on a big scale automatically like you just you operate in a very big and ambitious way where I think a lot of people have like self there's like self-imposed ceilings that are most likely invisible in many cases right if you want to build more wealth you want to grow great companies just find more customers to serve like it's pretty straightforward process but I do think one of the things that I absolutely love is and it's the way I ended the episode it's the way you ended the book and I would summarize what I'm about to say here uh as go allin you only get one shot at life and I think this is a perfect uh spot to like wrap our discussion. And so I'm just going to read from your book to you. And you said, "The summer after 8th grade, I attended the Rhode Island Governor's School for the Gifted in Art and Music, a summer enrichment program for kids who've been nominated by their schools. I wasn't sure what to expect. On the first night, I was captivated by a speech given by one of the leaders. I remember goosebumps rising on my arms as he spoke. This program is a special opportunity, but it's up to you to take advantage of it. You have a choice. You can waste the next couple of months and not accomplish that much. Or you can go allin. This is an opportunity to go deep on a project and do the best work you've ever done, but you have to decide if you want it. I learned what it meant to go allin. The magical connection between intensity of focus and the end result. This is the to me the punch line. I love this. If I put my whole heart and soul into a project, I had it in me to create really cool stuff. you talk about the passion and going allin and the advice that you'd have for other people listening to this. This is a perfect place to end. Thank you very much for writing the book. Thanks for taking the time, Brad. I really admire you. I've learned a lot from you. And now I'm I'm very uh humbled and privileged to call you a friend. I really appreciate it. Thank you very much. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast, founders. For almost a decade, I've obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs, searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.
どうかうまくいくように。
---
It's not a criticize criticism. It's just like that's the beauty of entrepreneurship is like you get to do it. So what is your archetype? What is like let me back up before I ask you a question because I've been having long conversations with Daniel Ek the founder of Spotify who's become a good friend and that's his whole thing where his like we we're actually might be writing something together about like he's concerned that there's going to be young entrepreneurs out there that are like I'm not like Elon or I'm not like Steve or I'm not like all these people so therefore I can't be an entrepreneur. He's like there's multiple archetypes. He's like I'm not like that. He says he thinks he's a better coach than he is a player. And essentially he has discovered it's almost like this. He recruits some of the best talent in the world to the point he's like, I used to be the best at product. That guy's better at product. He should do it. I'm that guy's a better designer. That guy that person's a better HR. That person's everything. So he's like the way I look at it is like much more of a coach than a player. What is your like archetype? I send around a a question pro, an app, and we say, "Um, here's all the materials uh pre-eread for the meeting." We don't do PowerPoints and go through all that nonsense where everyone tells each other how great they're doing. It's just the silliness that you see a lot in corporate America. We send all those decks out ahead of time. We have everybody read them and then we have everybody fill out the qu the app say based on everything I read here are my main takeaways and here are the main questions that I think are are so important in terms of creating value that we should the whole team all 25 of us who were in that meeting spend time debating and discussing around the table in the limited time we've got because 10 hours goes by like that. And then I send back out the takeaways and I send back out the questions. People rank them on a scale of 1 to 10. Again, we have an app for this. And then I send people the takeaways. Here's how they were rated. Here's what people thought were the most important takeaways. It's very valuable. Now you've got the benefit of everybody's perspectives on the same data. So people have seen the same charts, the same data, the same metrics, same KPIs, but they've seen it from a little different angle. It's very enlightening. And then I've got the questions. I tell everybody, rate the question 1 to 10. And then all the questions that are rated 8, nine and 10 and between eight and 10. That's the agenda, David. That's what we talked about. So we just went we then we put them in categories. Everything about tech that was rated eight or above. Here they are. Everything that was on comp or people, everything that was on strategic, everything was on M&A, all the different categories, only the ones that the group voted on at least in eight. Now what what's the consequence of that? Number one, we have an amazing meeting. like it's a good agenda much better than I could I could I could come up with because now it's got everybody's angle on it's group sourced. Secondly, everybody's involved in it because the boss didn't come down and like here's the agenda. It's like we collectively made the agenda so people realize the truth of the matter is we really respect each other's opinions. There's no one person who's the authoritarian figure who's like teaching everybody else. It's a group. I've I've created a group. I've created a super organism. I've created like a beehive or or or an ant colony or a brain or a human body. Super organisms, things that are a collection of people that the sum is greater than the collection of the parts and and the the whole is is greater than than each individual. We have a a holistic powerful approach to that. That's that's how I run the business. So, I've experimented with this over the years. I used to have larger meetings with 40 or 50 people. It just didn't work. And so those meetings, those monthly operating reviews, which are the most important meeting of the month, okay? So then the most senior people in the company come together and do the exercise I just mentioned for 10 hours with almost no breaks. Almost no breaks at all. That I have 25 people and I limit it to 25. I don't want more than 25. I I don't know what's so magic about 25, but 20 to 25 is the ideal group. If you have enough people that you get diversity of opinion and you have dialectical discussions, meaning looking at issues from multiple perspectives, then analyzing those and synthesizing them and finding the truth, but you don't have so many people that you're, you know, people are peacocking and trying to impress each other and and don't want to be vulnerable. You want people to be vulnerable. You want people to be to trust the other people in the room so much that you've created a safe zone to say, "You know what? I've been thinking this and thinking this, but the more I'm listening to you, the more I'm hearing about this, I may be wrong. Maybe I got this thing completely upside down. I'm starting to come around to looking at it like this with one little twist. Now I think what we should do is XYZ and then what do you all think of that?" That's a fantastic conversation when you have leaders of the company feeling it's safe to show that hey, I was wrong. I I was thinking wrong and I model that. I role model that myself all the time. Be flexible in thinking. Don't be rigid in thinking. Don't be black and white dichomous thinking, but be open-minded. Be receptive to be willing to learn and to be challenged. And that's okay to be proven wrong. It's actually a good thing. We're learning together. Yeah. So you basically start with an hour then next in this case nine hour n the nine hours for this meeting you're I'm mouth talked to but not inordinately. I've already used up my hour for God's sake, you know. you had a notepad and you were I'm talking and you're taking notes like what the hell is going. It's cool stuff. No, but it's the the reverse. In fact, uh I have a story about this and then I want another question for you was um Mitch Rails obviously one of the founders of Dana here. Um Oh, incredible. and um He's Yeah, he's uh he's actually a mentor of two close friends of mine. So, I get like insights uh uh from them about him and just what one of the most remarkable things that he's did, but uh he was at this uh vertical market software um uh conference. It was only like 40 people there recently. And a friend of mine, I was going for a walk in New York City about this and he says, "I don't understand. The guy sat in the front row. He's the most successful person there by far." And he was just taking notes the whole time. I was like, "That is why he's successful. It's not the reverse. It's not that you go and you build a $200 billion company, whatever it is, and then take notes. He was like that his whole time. Just a relentless like you have valuable information. Great. I just did this episode Jimmy Aine who's a very fascinating person and he's this great line. He said great can come from anywhere. And then you have this other thing. I I'll get back question. Great can come from anywhere. He he's in the music business. His point was that uh he was trying to help he he was partners and a mentor of Dr. Dre who's one of the greatest hip-hop producers of all time. Dre didn't have an artist to work with. They wind up getting this this demo tape from Eminem. And at the time he's this poor kid in Michigan living in a trailer park, right? No, like no resources at all. And yet they're like, we weren't looking for, you know, somebody to be controversial. We were looking for great. And guess what? It can come from anywhere. It came from this kid that was obsessed sitting in a freaking trailer park saying, I want to do this thing and I'm going to do this to the best of my ability. I want to talk about um I'm going to go back to this question I have, but you have I love this idea of of grabbing information which is really fascinating. There's multiple examples in your book and I find these in other books where it's just like it's so nuts This ability to like you just almost described it in these in these meetings. It's like, hey, we're going to disperse and ask these questions and see what comes back and then we'll rank the the information. Here it's like great this is and then we have a nice I ask everyone what's your single biggest takeaway from today? What is something that 10 hours ago you didn't understand about how we're going to make money and how we're going to serve customers better and how we're going to improve employee engagement and how we're going to kill the competition? What what is something you didn't know? What is something you learned and just go around one by one by one by one? And then I ask them, when I think about people not in this room, but people in the organization out there in the field, who's an MVP? Who's the most valuable player? who's somebody who's going above and beyond that you really respect, you really admire, you really think is amazing, wish we had thousand more like that person and why why are they and I send an email to them afterwards saying hey I was in a meeting the leaders of the company and you were nominated as an MVP because XYZ people love it so I just start crying a lot of times it's really really emotional thing it's really really nice thing Yeah. and and look at each person and say, "I admire this person because like what are the strengths, what are the qualities, what are the traits, what are the skills, what are the things that they do that you really are impressed with, you really like that person a lot." And just go one by one, look at each person and just identify that. And then after a minute or two's gone by, I say, "Okay, now let's do the same thing. look at each person and say I really so we've already said why I'm grateful they're on the team so now I want to say so was the gratitude gratitude is a wonderful leadership technique and then the second thing is I really wish that person great success of the company and I can picture this company five years from now accomplishing XYZ and and I I'm I'm I send nice vibes I send love vibes to that person just go around one by one all silently nothing out loud just one by one by one by one and you start seeing people smile like always. I've done it so many times. You start seeing people smile. You start looking at people. You see, looking at people in a very positive, uplifting way and appreciative way and then I say, "Okay, now we've concluded the day and I declare the day a success and congratulations." Then we just clap and we clap. Sometimes this clapping goes on for like five minutes [laughter] and it's like really really goes down but it's a very then people levitate home. They get go to the airport and go home. Maybe not as much as you think. No, but like how would you even know? Like this is this is an unusual like what you just described like how did you learn that? I've experimented with different things. I've read a lot. I've studied positive psychology. I've studied cognitive therapy. I've I've studied a lot of stuff. I read a lot of stuff. I meditate a lot. I I do things that that work for me. So I I think of things that have worked for me on my path my evolution of feeling gratitude and all the happiness that comes from feel feeling gratitude by feeling appreciation by problem solving all the different things and I try to embibe that to other people. So and then if it works if feed so feedback loops one of the key tenants of all my companies is we have intense voluminous feedback loops feedback loops between the senior team feedback loops between the senior team and mid-level management. Senior feedback loops between senior medium and frontline management. Feedback loops with customers. Feedback loops with vendors. Feedback loops with investors. all the part all the constituents of the constellation that make a a corporation that make a company we have we have to be communicating we have to be communicating very intensely with each other in an honest way and then sharing that information I share information much more widely in my organisms in my in my organizations than most companies most companies they they they're afraid to share it they're afraid to share they're afraid to share the good information they think a competitor is going to hear about it okay well they will but let them trying to copy us. They don't have all the ingredients to to do that. Or they say we don't want to share the bad stuff because then the market's going to hear our weaknesses. Okay. Well, that's kind of true, too. That's so much overshadowed by the benefit of we're learning where we have to improve. We're learning how to become better. I read something Jeff Bezos said that changed my perspective on the importance of high quality sleep. He said that he makes sure he gets 8 hours of sleep a night and as a result his mood, his energy and his decision-making is improved. His point was that you get paid to make high quality decisions and you can't do that if you're sleeping terribly. And the product that has made the biggest impact on my quality of sleep for years is eight. I'm lucky enough to be friends with the founder of eight, Matteo, and we live in the same city. A few months after I started using eightleep, I randomly ran into Matteo at a restaurant and I was with some friends. So, I go over and say, "Hi." When I got back to my table, my friend asked me, "Who was I talking to?" And I said, "That's Matteo, the founder of Eight." And my friend replied, "He looks like he gets good sleep." Matteo is living and breathing his product. I had never had the ability to change the temperature of my bed before I had an eight. I had no idea how much that would improve the quality of my sleep. I keep my eight ice cold. It's cold before I get into bed, so I fall asleep faster and wake up less during the night. That feature alone is worth 10 times the price. There are very few no-brainer investments in life and I believe eight is one of them. That is why elite founders like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk have all said publicly that they use eight. I would recommend getting the pod 5 which is the newest generation of their signature product. It is a smart mattress cover that you place on top of your existing mattress and it is next level sleep tech. It automatically regulates your body temperature throughout the night independently for each side of the bed. The result is you get up to a full hour of additional quality sleep per night. Make the no-brainer investment in your sleep by going to eight.comra and use the code senra to get $350 off. You can try it for 30 days at home and return it if you don't like it, but I'm confident you will love it. I will never let anyone take my eightle from me. Make sure you get yours at eight.comra. So this is what you were describing earlier. It's like almost a constant iterative trial and error process. Absolutely. I love it. They'd show up. They even have appointment on the books and they'd walk into the office and they're like, "Hey, I'm here to meet Sam for, you know, 7 a.m. meeting and his uh secretary is like, he hopped on because he used to fly his own plane and he left at 5 a.m. this morning and he went to, you know, this Walmart over here and he's hanging out and like greeting customers and talking to the people, stocking the shelves and everything else, but this constant I think there's a lot of wisdom in what you said in your book. Basically, is what I'm saying. It's like you see this over and over again. They they want unfiltered access from the front lines. They don't want the information to be, you know, massaged or or presented in a manner that that seems good. And uh we were talking on Saturday about uh when he was first he was getting on the JP Morgan board and he was kind of moving up in the world, stuff like that. I'm lost touch with him, but really great guy, really smart guy. And he said, "What are you doing?" I said, "I'm reading uh employee surveys. Uh I'm reading all the employee surveys from the whole company of we ask them two questions. What's your single best idea to improve the company and rate your job satisfaction scale of 1 to 10? And sometimes we add a third one of what it will take to make an attempt and I just go through all these one by one because I like I feel like I'm talking to every employee and learning on that. He said that's amazing. So what's so amazing about that? So I was just talking to Bezos and Bezos was uh reading customership right [laughter] customer. So I'm talking so it's this. So he's talking to customers. I'm talking to employees but it's the same concept. You need feedback loops. You don't know how you're doing unless you have radar like sending beep beep out there and seeing how it comes back. You have to have this very intense feedback loop. A rubber brake pad for horserawn carriages. Remember 1800 this 1888. They're like well horserawn carriages have been around for a while while you know what's growing way faster bicycles and then cars. Even from a small number like we need to go to where the techn is going. But the point being is like so we need to make more uh products. Uh we need to make rubber tires. And the guy took over a factory. It's like I don't know how to do that. So his answer was he would go and he sounds just like what you do. He he only had like 50 employees that were making the rubber brake pads and he would just ask questions. He's like I came to them and I admitted my ignorance. I go know nothing about manufacturing. Why' you do that? Can you explain to me can we what if we did? And not in like what you just said. You said something about not like coming down from on high. It's like appear almost like teach me. And he's like it was wildly effective. And he's got a great line in that book. He's like, "It turns out the guy that handles the material for eight hours a day while the CEO's in the office has something to teach you." Like he's going to understand something about that process because you you're you have like a bird level view. He has a very particular job and he found it very instructive and he's like it was a wonderful way to learn the business and then that led him to like oh now I know how to make things and then from there to grow and grow and grow and I just absolutely love this idea. is like you should have this unfiltered access, unfiltered information over and over and over again how do you figure out how you're doing in your position? I ask all day long and and we have different modalities of anonymous surveys and 360 reviews and and we're I'm interacting with the teams non-stop all day long. I'm working on people's offices. What's going on? What do you think of this? What do you think of that? I love that. It's fantastic. Yeah. I don't always agree with it, but but I but some of it there's always some truth in it. You you you get free advice from like the smartest people in the world, the global allocators, people who have raised billions of dollars from from pensions and endowments and and and sovereign wealth funds. And now they're they're analyzing what you're doing and they're giving you advice. They're telling you this is what I like, this is what I don't like. Okay, you don't have to you actually you mathematically can't agree with it all because a lot of times you get conflicting advice. people saying you you're going right, you should be going left. The other guy saying you're going you should go left even more. So you're it's good to hear all this stuff. It's good to hear what people are saying. But then you have to go within yourself and you have to you got to make the decision. You have to be an adult. You have to you take in tons and tons of information and opinions and beliefs and data t as much as possible. Then you've got to kind of just ignore all that. Just go inside and say this is what I want to do. You got to make the call. That's what a CEO does. the leader does is you make the call, but you have to get all that input. Otherwise, I think for a long time like one big goal was like starting a company and then taking it public and now I talked to a lot of founders and even the ones that raise a lot of money and they don't want to ever go public. Do you have any What would like what advice would you give to somebody that's say 30 years younger than you? They're trying to build a great p uh company. They've raised a bunch of money, but they don't want to go public. But there's there's a bunch of them like that never want to go public. You know, it'd be interesting to ask them why. What's the reason why you don't want be taking share and growing the margins, increasing the increasing the profit margins. If I did those two things, everything else flowed. Everything else flowed from that. But those are the two main things. In order to do those accomplish those two things, you want as much input as possible. You want as many many chef many chefs in the kitchen as you possibly can. The public gets you hundreds and thousands of voices. So it's amazing data. It also being public allows you to build a brand much faster and much more voluminously. So you want to be a magnet for talent for drivers, for people in the branches, for people in mid-level management. You want to you want to be get going back to what we said before. You always want great talent coming in. Well, if nobody knows who you are, they're a little skeptical about joining your company. If you have research re written about you by bunches of firms and you have press releases and a public website and you're very well known what you're doing. It's very clear what you're doing. People say, "Okay, I get it. You're a known quantity and and I I like this. I buy into it. I like what you're doing. I want to join the company." So, in order and then you can pay them. You compensate them with stuff they can look on their iPhone every day and see the value of the compensation. But if you're private, you give people these phantom shares or whatever the compensation plan is. They don't really know the value of it until they sell it someday and it may be very different than what they thought it was all along. So from a a compensation point of view, which is a big element of success in these high growth business plans, being public is fantastic. I've been doing public since 1992 and I'm non-stop and and I'm I like it that I don't I enjoy it. It's I find it very helpful, very constructive. I like the pressure. I like I like the ability to hear what the street says and then agree with what I agree with, but to disagree with I what I think is wrong, what I feel passionately and have evidence to support they're wrong. So sometimes the street, particularly like the hedge funds, they're very focused on like this quarter, like the next 90 days. That's a terrible thing long term. You don't want to be focusing on just what's good for the quarter. You end up, you see these public companies that go out and they cut costs in the field. that hurts customer service or hurts employee morale and they're underst staffed which is even worse than being overstaffed which is which is bad and and here it's it's a completely different story. So yeah I I I like being public. I do thrive on it. So many people give you the money. They whether it's a an a retail individual, whether it's a high net worth family, whether it's it's a sovereign wealth fund, whether it's a pension plan, whether it's an endowment, all these people are invested long only funds, mutual funds. All these people are giving they're wiring money to buy your shares. This is a intense pressure. This is a this is probably the biggest pressure I have in life is to make sure that I do everything I possibly can to make sure I give them back more money than they gave me. make sure that they invest in the company and like if you look at my neighbors and my friends I don't know the exact number but I would guess over 90% of them are invested in the company and that that's what it's been over time well that's pressure man that's like wow I don't want to disappoint them these are my relatives these are my friends these are people I really love these are people people come to say look I believe in you so much I put twothirds of my my retirement plan in in your stock just single no to forget diversification boom I'm going all in on Brad and his team well that's a lot of pressure. I like that pressure. I enjoy that pressure that motivates me. That inspires me. That makes me feel I have something to do here that's important. That's not me. No, he he wouldn't sleep. He's like it was just he's just hilarious stories in his life. And I thought he was like he just lived on the edge and and completely like all in. There's a great story uh about this where they tried to get him, you know, he chain smoke and then drink a fifth of bourbon every day and they're like um but then he had like prostate cancer or something like that. Like you should stop smoking. He's like I don't smoke with my prostate. [laughter] But but that's not the thing that I remember. The thing that I loved in an interview one time they're like you have like you deal with a ton of stress. Like how do you handle it? He goes I don't handle it. I like it. he wanted the stress. He's like, I want to be in the game. Yes. passion." What I love about this is it's in your book. you you constantly talk about the the other uh people uh the other entrepreneurs, other investors, other CEOs that you learn from then acknowledgements, all these maxims from all these other brilliant people. You talk about uh obviously Lwig Justin. Uh I do want to talk about I read something on LinkedIn about other I want to talk about the other people that you've learned from the other founders, CEOs, executives that you admire. Uh I want to start with Fred Smith since he he passed away. Yeah. Yeah. The complexity. You wrote on LinkedIn you you never missed an opportunity to spend time with them and you admired him. Could you just tell like why? Yeah, I saw. So Fred was amazing guy. so I met Fred for the first time in 2013 and I was doing a bunch I came out of nowhere from this industry. I got in in 2011, but I really started doing a bunch of acquisitions out of nowhere and suddenly like I was on the front pages of the trade journals Oh, wow. Marines who had been killed, but you don't leave any Marine behind. He'd go in the He's risking his life with bullets like shot every shooting at him to go get the remains of a dead Marine. Putting his own life on life. He got a purple heart. He got silver. He got I mean serious serious serious courageous high integrity guy. And everybody everybody loved everybody loved Fred. Everybody loved Fred. He goes to Vegas. Well, I don't recognize that in him. So, so throwing something out the window. at 30. I think he might have been a little different. He was generous. He was charitable. He would always take a meeting with me. He'd come to my house. We'd spend hours and hours and hours talking about everything. Yeah. Fred and Amazon didn't get along. I don't think people understand how much that go I'm glad you just said that because yeah, you could see in the books. You hear stories like that. it's about Fred Smith. If it if I don't have that trait, I should work on getting it. I like that. Yeah. Going back to what I saying before, you don't want to be rigid in your thinking. You want to be open-minded. You want to be flexible. You want to be scientific about it. That if new evidence comes along that disproves your your theory, then modify your theory. Go by the evidence. Go by the facts. You want to get you want to interact with people who you respect and you want to be picking their brain all the time. and the application of technology which is I love how At the end of your book, you have essentially what what are all the the the some key ide some key technology developed by humans starting, you know, back 300,000 years ago and you move forward. I thought that was a beautiful way to like just put that in the the I've read every book he's written. I've read every article about him. I see every YouTube he's I I'm a Ray Ray Kerswell fan. I mean I really and what I read in the singularity is near in 2005 2006 when that book came out kindred spirit here this somebody who thinks in large scale of time and and what are the key things that have happened over the last 13 billion years and reducing that down to a couple hundred points. I thought it was real helpful. So I modified it a bit and and made it more specific to business, things that would be applicable to business. But the main trend going back to Mr. Justin about you got to get the main trend right. The main trend for the last two million years has been humans creating tools aka technology to do things to outsource to those things that do better than us that free up our time. So whether it was fire, whether it was a wheel, whether it was the printing press and more recently all the all the digital electronic stuff we've done and all the internet and now artificial intelligence and robotics and nanotechnology. This is the trend. The the main trend in life and therefore in business is technology. Outsourcing our senses, outsourcing our memory, outsourcing now our intellect, our speech to to to computers to to the to to the cloud. This is big. This is really really really big. So when I looked at 55 different industries before I picked building products, I ruled out a bunch of them. So this is looks like an interesting industry, but I think AI and automation are going to kibbash and I didn't do it. And I I mentioned in the book there was one particular online education company was called uh CHEG. I said I don't know. It seemed like you got a good business, but I think these these l the AI is going to come in basically do that for free. Well, you know, and I said I think the stock might come down. Well, stock came down a lot. heard from 50 to single digits. So, fortunately, I made a good prediction there. As Yogi Bear said, predictions are difficult, particularly when they're about the future. [laughter] That turned out to be a good prediction. Why was that a good prediction? Because to me, I'm looking at it saying the main trend, the long-term trend is to use technology to do things that we've been doing ourselves. And and so, I'm always trying to look at these different work streams and say, is that something that can be automated? Is that something that's going to be AI or robotics going forward? and then and then capitalizing on that sometimes a lot better not slightly better uh you know 40 years ago and then uh the waste management uh when you're like hey how like I should get into this and then you realize wait they're not even using technology to figure out the most efficient route and you you you this constant application to technology is one of the things I'm glad it was on my notes but I'm glad you uh brought like uh directed the conversation there because Motivation. In business you always want to be finding waste because there always is some and eliminate it. You always want to find inefficiencies and there always are. You want to reduce them. Technology helps you with that. Walmart's a big tech company. So my chief supply chain officer came out of Walmart very very sophisticated guy. It's all about technology, all about using tech in order to get the data and then being very data driven. that everybody's like you should do more XYZ. is like why are they all American and that that I understand that and my point being is like if you think about entrepreneurship in like the market economy it's only a couple hundred years old. It's like well America's kind of dominated there so it makes sense if 75 or 80% of my episodes are about that but I uh I did one on one of the the most successful entrepreneurs in Europe named Amanio Ortega and I didn't know anything about him. All I know is that uh Zara. Index. Yeah. Yeah. And then you're reading about this, you're like, it's not a fashion company. It is a technology company. What does that mean? He built the logistics and the system to say, me and you can walk out on the street right now and we can see, oh, there's there's a trend here where all these ladies are wearing dresses with whatever, you know, red flowers on them. And he can take that idea and put it through his system and he can have manufacture dresses with red flowers in eight, you know, 25 different countries in seven days. That is technology. He says it's like we're a technology company with a chain of stores attached to it. 100%. I'm going to go back to Fred Smith. He says something that sounds Yeah, of course. He's always talking about this new invention he just did in the moving packages and robots. And we were trying to figure out some way you could use automation LTL because he was a big LTL. FedEx is the biggest action LTL and XPO is big LTL. The automation is not there yet to get because all the closed spaces and all the people still involved in that, but it's going to be package. You have automation though. package automation is much further ahead. Oh yes. If you want someone to disagree with that, you have to talk to somebody else. 100% agree. I'm curious how you do this though. Mhm. How many things at any given time are you having to focus on? But when you say that the CEOs that you think might not be doing the best they could, are they delegating too much? the first two bars when you do levers comprise the vast majority of what you have to do to create the value. And those are buying companies, right? Meaning being very disciplined what you pay and looking at lots of acquisition candidates at the same time so you don't fall in love with any one of them and so you have alternatives and you don't My teams and I have I like to give credit to my team. So you you and your team have done over 500 acquisitions. You've looked at how many? Like hundred thousand you think it would be that I've lost count. I don't know if it's 100,000. When I say look looked at in depth. But in the thousands many thousands. So many many people know Warren Buffett. I I barely know Warren Buffett. met him a few times but he's not a close personal friend. I wish he was but he's not but I know a lot of people who are close to me who are close to him and they they most of them have the same story so he must tell this to everybody. He tells people I'm the richest person I'm the wealthiest person in the world and they say well this puppet you work for one period of time but I think you're number four or what he says no no I'm the I can prove that I'm the wealthiest person in the world. I say, "Why is that?" And he reaches and he brings out his daytime or his, you know, his calendar. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think I have a problem saying no, though. Like, this is why I'm asking you. So first of all, I'm not that famous. I'm well known in the The business community that's the only community I care about. [laughter] But like like you know And and I'm not one of the richest people in the world. There's many people who are vastly richer than I am. But in my own modest way, I' I've created some level of recognition and some of some of wealth and more importantly. Well, I appreciate that. But but I just put in context. It's not the way you said it is a little grandiose. I don't think I I don't think I am. Well, cuz I want to correct the record. I don't want to get grandiose in the wrong. So when I was researching after after No no excuse me. After United Rentals I was looking for my next thing and I went and I went to Chicago and I wanted to get an appointment with Ken Griffin. Who now I've met now I know and he's a neighbor down in Florida. I'm don't know well known well enough Uh but he would turn down the meeting. you wouldn't take the meeting said wow that's kind of humbling and and [laughter] but you can't even like spend an hour says no Ken is a very and I think you you interviewed him right he could be president of United States someday Ken's in a different league than I Ken is like way way up there. Oh, you should defin you should definitely do something on him. You asked how I manage my time. So I have a chief of staff. He used to work in the Oval Office and manage the most important person in the world's calendar. I mean he's he's always very very good So you run every decision between those two. Everybody around me. So So if I'm spending too much time on like I'm going to catch heck for being on this podcast. I mean, they're going to No, I love doing it. yeah go ahead what w t o n waste of time waste of money so when people are brainstorming and kind of let's do this let's do that someone can say wadwamp [laughter] everybody knows that's a waste of time waste of money like how does that how does what you're suggesting we do influence directly or even indirectly growing organic revenue growth or increasing the margin and if it doesn't wam that's a waste of time waste of money you only you have limited time and you have limited capital you've got to be directing that time and deploying that capital the things that have the greatest returns otherwise it's watwam Well you do get better as you keep with experience like in anybody in anything but the principles are pretty the same. If you look at all my companies, the the essential concepts are the same. That you want to have fantastic people. That you want to have rules of engagement with those people where you get along and go kill the competition instead of killing each other. That you want to have fair compensation so that everybody's in on the action here. So Very very early. very early in the oil brokerage days because I used to have we had tables like 10 brokers at a table and every month we pay people monthly I'd meet with everyone and say look we made so much this month in the bonus pool what percent do you think you contributed to it and then I would add it up and it would always come to like 300% [laughter] never added up to 100%. So I had to have these difficult conversations with people say you know I think you're [laughter] inflated with how much that but I I what I realized very early on is people are coming to work not because they love me they might love me I might love them but that's not their main motivation the main motivation why they're coming to work is to make money and make money for themselves and more often to make money for others to make money for their families for their spouses their kids or whoever and that's important to to understand the motivation of the other person is really really important. It's called theory of mind where you understand and a child gets that after a few years. They don't have it at first and there a lot of psychological studies done on that. It's important to to look at things from what's motivating the other person, what's driving the other person, what's important to that other person. That's good in deal making, that's good in compensation, that's good in building teams, that's good in customer relations, that good with vendor relations. You need to understand their point of view. You can't just be in your mind. You can't just say, "Here's what I want. Here's what's important to me, and I'm a bully. I'm going to go get it cuz then people just going to stick their tongue out and you're going to turn away and do something with else. You have to be a have a partnership. You have you have to be trading with people all the time. You got to be figuring out what will help them, what's good for them, and how can we make money together, not me at your expense or you at my expense, but how can we go conquer the world together? I think you're a faster learner than me because like I I don't think I ever thought of about incentives. Uh I think episode like 97, so this is probably like six years ago. I'd read that means I read 96 biographies before this. I get to poor Charlie Smarmac and he's really the one that got Charlie was the one that really put into the my mind about how important this was because I thought he was one of I still think he's the wisest person I ever met and probably one of the most brilliant people. And he said something fascinating in that book where he's like I've been in the top 5% of my age cohort my entire life of understanding the power of incentives and how it drives human behavior and there's not a year that goes by and he's probably in his 60s when he said this. There's not a year that goes by where I don't underestimate the power of incentives. And you repeat over and over again, you show me the incentive, I will show you the outcome. So I meet with my CHRO who's fabulous regularly, usually twice a month. And she shows me a spreadsheet of how much the equity is going to be worth at $50 a share, $75 a share, $100 a share. And I I look at that. I look at the numbers and and I say, "Okay, this person has something to work for. This person's on the team. This person that's something that I see them working really hard to get get those numbers or I see, gee, you know, somehow or another we messed up the comp and maybe we got to top the person up or wow, I can't take anything back, but maybe I gave too much, [laughter] whatever." But at least I know where everyone's head is at because I know what's in it for them. You know, there's always that joke, I listen to radio station WM, what's in it for me? And and and people are generally, Yeah. It's I don't I don't feel it's a negative thing at all. It's like we're all self obsessed. It is. But I do think you have a great line in the book where you're like, "Money," he's like, "I built businesses all over the world." When you have 150,000 employees, they're spread throughout, you know, people think, "Oh, it's all different cultures." Like, "Oh, guess what? Money animates people everywhere." For the whole point, you have a great line in the book. Like, they're not coming to work to make Brad Jacobs more money. They're doing it for their you know I think Amazon modified that that mission statement. Now something with employee engagement too um it is funny when you think about it because um it's one of I have this conversation actually last night I went to dinner with our mutual friend Patrick Oanesy he text me this morning he's like make sure you say tell Brad yeah 100% and we had he was with us when we had breakfast here a few months ago as what uh Jeff has built I'm reliving the goosebumps literally, but physically I'm feeling the tingling my sensation because that was in a critical moment in my life where I I I understood that it's up to you. You can dattle through life and just kind of sleepwalk and then die. Or you can live life. You can embrace life. You can have big dreams and go all in and find your passion, which for most people is not going to be business or making money, but whatever it is, that's what it is. And really achieve something fantastic. And for me, that's big motivator. All the best.
このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。 公式サイト(davidsenra.com)にはエピソード要約はありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは前提にしていません。 参照: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WXZg4_xcGs / https://www.davidsenra.com
一般に YouTube 自動字幕の精度は条件で大きく変わります。 - 条件が良いと 85–95% 前後まで上がる例もある - アクセント・早口・専門用語・固有名詞・複数話者 で一気に落ちる
このエピソードはインタビュー(2人会話)で比較的クリアですが、会社名・人名(Jesselson / Philipp Brothers / Norbert Dentressangle / Beacon / Mitchell Rales 等)や業界用語が多く、名前の誤変換が起きやすいタイプです。
自動字幕原文に出やすい典型例です(日本語本文側では多くを修正済み)。
| 字幕に出た/出やすい表記 | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | Lewig / litig / Mr. Justin / Miss Mson | Ludwig Jesselson / Mr. Jess | | for brothers | Philipp Brothers(商品取引) | | Samzel | Sam Zell | | United Rents | United Rentals | | Robert Dangla | Norbert Dentressangle(XPO が買収した欧州物流) | | Conway | Con-way(XPO が買収した物流) | | Apollo Ono | Apolo Ohno | | Patrick Oanesy | Patrick O'Shaughnessy | | Mitch Rails / Dana here | Mitchell Rales / Danaher | | Jimmy Aine | Jimmy Iovine | | Be a Dealer | Beat the Dealer(Ed Thorp) | | saliva bump | 完璧主義的な強迫(言い淀み/誤認識) | | sendora / enra | senra(スポンサースラッグの崩れ) | | ramp.com 周辺の長いホスト独白 | Ramp スポンサー読み | | hubspot.com 周辺 | HubSpot スポンサー読み |
つまり英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、学習用の対照テキストとしては有用でも、引用の一次ソースとしては動画そのものを優先してください。
完全対応ではありません。 - 日本語は読みやすさのため発言をまとめ・整文している - 英語は自動字幕の切れ目が多く、発言数が日本語より細かい/混線することもある - ページでは話者(センラ/ジェイコブズ)を手がかりに、順番で英語を紐づけている
そのため「この日本語のこの1文 = この英語のこの1文」とは限らず、だいたい同じ話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。
- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け。英語は約9.5pxの補助情報 - 英語を少し大きく … 約11px前後。対照しながら精読したいとき用
英語をメインにすると誤変換に引きずられやすいので、デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」にしています。
本文から省略しています。音声上は Ramp / HubSpot 等の読み上げが入っています。番組エンディングの Founders 案内・チャンネル登録のお願いも本文では省略しています。
Brad Jacobs(ブラッド・ジェイコブズ) は、複数のビリオンダラー企業を連続して築いた起業家・経営者。代表的な系譜は United Waste Systems、United Rentals、XPO Logistics(およびスピンオフの GXO / RXO)、そして本編時点で進める流通・建材流通系の QXO(Beacon 買収など)など。公開市場での長期株主価値創出と、買収+オペ改善の「同じツールキット」を業界横断で回すスタイルで知られる。著書に 『How to Make a Few Billion Dollars』。本編では続編 『How to Make a Few More Billion Dollars』 執筆にも言及。
起業家伝記を扱う Founders ポッドキャストで知られるホスト。本番組 David Senra Show では創業者インタビューを行う。ジェイコブズの本を Founders で扱い、ローンチパーティや朝食など、収録前から交流がある、と本編で語られる。
- Ludwig Jesselson … ジェイコブズが若い頃からランチで学んだメンター。本人は常に Mr. Jess と呼ぶ。 - マキシム: Get the major trend right(大きなトレンドを正しく取れ)。問題を落ち込まず機会として扱う、長期の信頼・握手のディール文化なども彼経由で語られる。 - Philipp Brothers … 当時世界最大級の商品取引会社の一つとして言及(字幕では for brothers 等に崩れやすい)。
数字・逸話の細部は話者の口頭ベース。伝記・公式史と完全一致する保証はありません。
本編で繰り返されるプレイブックの要約: 1. 業界選定 … 大きい/成長/断片化/妥当な買収価格/テック余地/近い将来AIで根こそぎ破壊されにくい 2. チーム … 自分より賢い専門人材(CHRO / M&A / 財務など) 3. 報酬 … シニアに大量エクイティ。5年ロック、後半にベスティング集中 4. 文化 … 敬意+異論。科学的な試行錯誤(MOR 等) 5. 二つの本業 … 妥当価格での買収 + 3〜5年で利益(EBITDA)倍増
辞める想像をしたときの感情: - C … 内心ほっとする → 早く外す - B … 残念だが替えが効く - A … 純粋な恐怖・パニック(替えがきかない)
「組織はパーティー。バイブスを上げる人だけ招待」も同趣旨。
約 20〜25人、約10時間、端末オフ。事前資料を読み、学びと質問をアプリで1〜10評価し、8〜10だけがアジェンダ。CEOが上からアジェンダを下ろさない。終盤は MVP 指名・感謝・決意表明などの「人間の時間」。フィードバックループと安全な異論が文化の中核、と語られる。
FedEx 創業者。ジェイコブズの本を推薦し、競合関係にありながら親交。NAM 会議での肯定コメントが友情のきっかけ、と本編で語られる。時間と資本の配分、テクノロジーとしての物流、brutal な時間管理なども引用される。
字幕では壊れやすい。垂直市場ソフトの小さな会議で最前列メモ、という逸話として Danaher 共同創業者 Mitchell Rales と同定して本文を整えた(口頭ベース)。
- United Rentals … 建設機器レンタル。ジェイコブズが約10年CEO。 - XPO … 物流。前十年の株価パフォーマンス上位の例として言及。 - GXO … XPO からスピンオフした契約物流。Zara(Inditex)の欧州倉庫運営などの文脈。 - Beacon / QXO … 本編時点の新しい統合プラットフォーム。Beacon 買収後の MOR が具体例として語られる。
社名・案件の範囲・時点は口頭整理。IR・プレスリリースを一次情報とすること。
1. 英語オフで日本語だけ通読(話の骨を掴む) 2. 気になったターンだけ英語オン 3. FAQ で固有名詞を確認 4. 一次情報として動画の該当箇所を確認
要約ブログではなく、収録の対話の流れを話者交替のまま再構成した学習用テキストです。フィラーや重複、スポンサーは削り、固有名詞は文脈修正していますが、トピックの欠落を意図したダイジェストではありません。
- 動画: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WXZg4_xcGs
- 番組・ノート: https://www.davidsenra.com
- 対話本文: article-ja.md
- 見た目: article-ja.html
- 日英対照(CRIT用): article-bilingual.md
- FAQ: FAQ-ja.md