David Senra · JA + tiny EN

ワシントンがCoinbaseを殺そうとしたとき——ブライアン・アームストロング

Brian Armstrong: When Washington Tried to Kill Coinbase

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラアームストロング
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

君の仕事のうち、どれくらいが暗号業界の代弁者として政治的な力を築くことになっている?

EN

How much of your job is building political power as an advocate for like the crypto industry?

アームストロング#2

行かなくてもいいけど、ビジネスのためには価値があると思う。嫌じゃない。ある意味では好きでもある。面白い人がいる。だいたい四半期に一度くらい。最近は市場構造の立法が正念場だから、四半期に一〜二回かもしれない。ここ数年は四半期一回くらいだ。

EN

Yeah, I mean I don't have to go, but I I I think it's worth it for the business. I don't mind going. I like doing in some ways I like doing it. There's some pretty interesting people there. Uh so I go about once a quarter. Um maybe once or twice a quarter recently because we're right at the the crux of this this key moment for market structure legislation. But I'd say over the last few years, yeah, about once a quarter.

センラ#3

市場構造の「正念場」って何?

EN

What's the key moment for the market structure? Well, uh, the crypto industry has been working for a long time on getting in the Senate, a whole bunch of people been trying to get this, uh, piece of legislation passed. Um, in the House, it was called the Clarity Act. In the Senate, um, they're drafting their own version of it, but it's it's essentially clarifying this question about which of these crypto assets are commodities versus securities. And, you know, someone might say, well, why does it matter? It matters because in the United States, we have two different regul federal regulators, a CFTC and the SEC. The CFTC regulates commodities, the SEC regulates securities. And so it turns out in the past uh this ambiguity about where crypto assets set sit between the two federal regulators that lack of clarity was really weaponized and uh by Gary Gendler the former SEC chair and Elizabeth Warren and people like that who tried to in my view unlawfully kill the industry in the United States. So in other countries where we operate like in the UK or in Singapore they only have one federal regulator for financial services. So they actually don't care whether these are commodities or securities. is a totally uh parochial issue in the United States that's kind of like this turf war between two federal agencies in the past. So anyway, we just decided we need to get legislation passed by Congress to clarify once and for all which of them go in which bucket so that a future Gary Gansler couldn't come in and try to kill the industry.

アームストロング#4

暗号業界はずっと、上院でこの種の立法を通そうとしてきた。下院では Clarity Act と呼ばれた。上院は独自の案を書いているが、本質は同じで、どの暗号資産がコモディティで、どれが証券かをはっきりさせることだ。

なぜ大事か。アメリカには連邦の金融規制当局が二つある。CFTC がコモディティ、SEC が証券。このあいだで暗号資産がどこに座るのか曖昧だった。その曖昧さが、前SEC議長のゲイリー・ゲンスラーエリザベス・ウォーレンらに、僕の見方では違法に近い形で、アメリカの業界を殺すために武器化された。

一方、イギリスやシンガポールのように金融サービスが一つの連邦規制当局の国では、コモディティか証券かなど気にしない。アメリカ特有の、二機関の縄張り争いだ。だから国会で立法を通し、どのバケツに入るかを一回で明確にし、将来またゲンスラー型が来ても業界を殺せないようにしよう、と決めた。

EN

So what was the law they were trying to do?

センラ#5

当時、規制側は何をしようとしていた?

EN

Well, okay, so long story, but um you know, essentially this was around like the 2020 2021 time frame. um Coinbase. We decided we wanted to become become a public company. We had been operating for about nine years at that point and we went in and went through the normal process with the SEC. You have to describe your entire company, how it works, you know, how do we decide which assets to list, which do we not list? Um at that time, we we wanted there to be a path to have crypto securities be traded. Simple way to think of it is a security is like a way to raise money for a company that you want to start. A commodity is something that's decentralized kind of like oil or gold or copper [snorts] or something like that, right? So, Bitcoin is decentralized. Nobody controls it. Everyone pretty much agrees Bitcoin is a commodity, but there were people issuing tokens which were raising money for different projects they were doing um that were in various stage stages of decentralization. So, was it a commodity? Was it a security? this and then Gary Gendler uh the SEC chair at that time um my understanding is that you know he and Elizabeth Warren essentially um decided they wanted to use this to curtail the crypto industry and if you want to know why

アームストロング#6

長い話になるが、だいたい2020〜2021年頃だ。Coinbaseは上場を決めた。当時で約9年運営していて、SECに通常どおり入った。会社の全部を説明し、どの資産を上場しどれをしないか、など。当時は、暗号の証券も取引できる道筋が欲しかった。

簡単に言うと、証券は会社を立ち上げる資金調達の一形態。コモディティは石油・金・銅のように分散的なもの。ビットコインは誰も支配しない。みんなほぼビットコインはコモディティだと同意する。一方、さまざまなプロジェクトのためにトークンを発行して資金調達している人たちは、分散の段階がまちまちで、コモディティか証券かが曖昧だった。

その頃のSEC議長ゲンスラーとウォーレンは、僕の理解では、これを使って暗号業界を抑え込むと決めた。なぜか? ウォーレンは、僕の見方では社会主義寄りで、金融サービスは政府が全部やるべきだと考えている。彼女は議会を迂回して、大手銀行への影響力を持つ道を見つけていた。

EN

why okay so Elizabeth Warren is um you know in my view she's a socialist she believes the government should be running all financial services and um she had essentially found a way to bypass Congress and have a lot of influence over financial institutions big like big banks and she did.

センラ#7

その影響力はどうやって?

EN

How would she get that influence?

アームストロング#8

規制当局を任命し、議会が必ずしも認可していないことを銀行に圧力でやらせる。憲法上、法律を作れるのは議会だけだが、規制当局には実施上の裁量がある。銀行が来て、「暗号企業をサービスしていますか?」と聞く。違法ではない、と言われる。でも「次の検査でたくさん質問する。リスクについて深い懸念がある」と言う。銀行の中は一瞬でメッセージを受け取る。「これはあまり好まれていない」。違法ではない。でも銀行規制当局が「跳べ」と言ったら、だいたい「どの高さですか」と聞きがちだ。

ウォーレンは同じやり方で、石油・ガスや銃器産業への融資も止めさせた、と。政治的アジェンダを銀行に食い込ませていた。そこに、その枠の外で動く新しいシステムとして暗号が来た。気に入らなかった。議会の人たちから聞いた話では、彼女がゲンスラーに暗号を本気で抑えろと頼んだ、と。彼がやったのはローフェア(訴訟で潰すやり方)だ。

上場後、SECには30回くらい会った。何でも話す。ルールを教えてくれ。アメリカで業界を作りたい。ルールがあれば従う。それが本来のあり方だ。向こうは「助言はしない。弁護士に聞け」。翌日、執行措置が届く。「法律のどこが悪いのか見せてくれ」。「いや、従えと。これらの資産を上場廃止しろ。さもなくば訴える」。ある時点で、裁判所で決着をつけよう、となった。

EN

Well, she would appoint uh regulators that could essentially go in and uh pressure the banks to do things that Congress had not necessarily authorized. So under the constitution, you know, only Congress is allowed to make laws. Um but the regulator is given some discretion about how they implement those laws. So you can imagine, let's say you're a bank and you have a, you know, your bank regulator and they come in. this is they they can choose to, you know, lose your paperwork and not approve something for 90 days or two years or 5 years or they can you can have a good relationship with them and they can approve things. So, let's say they they come in and they start to ask you, "Hey, are you guys serving crypto companies?" And you say, "Well, yes." And and they say, "Uh, well, you know, that's not illegal, per se, but we're going to have a lot of questions about that in the next exam that we do of your bank. We we have deep concerns about the risk that this might introduce. you know, suddenly everyone inside the bank's getting the message real real loud and clear like, "Oo, maybe they don't like us doing this." Now, is it illegal? No. Um, but the banks regulators, if they say jump, you sometimes want to say how high, right? And um, this was the kind of uh, extrajudicial pressure that Elizabeth Warren was able to create on banks. She did it, by the way, in a bunch of other industries, too. like she got them to stop giving loans to like oil and gas and um you know firearms industry and some things that she like her own political agenda basically. So she got kind of her hooks into these banks had a lot of influence over them. suddenly crypto comes along which is a new system operating outside of that and um she she didn't like it too much and so she asked uh my understanding this is kind of what other people in the congress told me is that uh she asked Gary Ganzo to go hard on crypto and like try to really curtail it in the United States and that's what he did he created a bunch of lawfare essentially like we'd go in to meet with him we did maybe 30 times we met with the SEC um after becoming a public company where they allowed us to become a public company and you know we'd say hey we're here. We'll tell you anything you'd like to know. Just tell us what are the rules. We're here to like we're trying to build this industry in America. You you tell us the rules. We follow the rules. That's how it's supposed to work. And they would say, uh, we're not going to give you any any advice. Go talk to your lawyer. And then the next day, like a enforcement action would arrive. And um and we'd say, how what what can you show us in the law what what you think we've done that's wrong? Like, no, we're not going to do that. Like, you need to comply like basically delist all these assets or um we're going to sue you. And so at a certain point we just said okay let's go to the courts and find out who initiated the legal action them or you.

センラ#9

訴訟を起こしたのはどちら?

EN

It was actually both. They created an enforcement action and initiated lawsuit against us. We actually sued them proactively because they had violated another part of the law called the administrative procedures act where they're they're required actually by law to engage with the industry to promulgate rules and they had failed to do that. Wait, how many companies sue their regulator? Very few. So [laughter] this this actually gets into like one of the big themes of you know um I don't know like me as a CEO like I I want to try to always do the right thing and I have a very long-term perspective like I'm trying to create an important outcome here in the world which is around increasing economic freedom in the world. So you know in the short term I knew this was going to hurt our company. A lot of public market investors they just this company is suing its regulator. I'll just wait and see. I'm not going to buy that stock you know. [laughter] Um actually a lot of people I talked to at that time they were like do not sue the SEC. Like this is a bad idea. But I but I did I actually talked to a couple other financial services CEOs who had sued the SEC and won. And so I I knew it was possible. You know, it's a little bit like um you remember when SpaceX was trying to get that contract with the government?

アームストロング#10

両方だ。彼らが執行と訴訟を起こし、僕らも先に訴えた。彼らは行政手続法(APA)に違反していた——業界と関与してルールを作る義務があり、それを果たしていなかった。

EN

Yeah. And they they they didn't think it was fair how it was awarded and they sued and they won. Like Palanteer had to do something similar. So you don't you don't want to do these things um half-hazardly or you know but you you do there are moments where you have to stand up and and sue the regulator or the government and they'll to actually get the right outcome.

センラ#11

自社の規制当局を訴える会社って、何社ある?

EN

Okay. So when you're deliberating on whether to do this or not?

アームストロング#12

ほとんどない。ここが、僕のCEOとしての大きなテーマの一つにつながる。僕はいつも正しいことをしたいし、とても長期視点だ。世界の経済的自由を増やすという大事な結果を作りたい。短期的には会社に痛い。公開市場の投資家は「規制当局を訴える会社? 様子見」と株を買わない。当時多くの人に「SECを訴えるな。悪い考えだ」と言われた。

でも、SECを訴えて勝った金融サービスのCEOにも何人か話した。可能だと分かっていた。SpaceXが政府との契約で不公平だとして訴えて勝った話を覚えている? Palantirも似たことをした。無計画にやるものじゃない。でも、正しい結果を得るために、規制当局や政府に立ち向かって訴える瞬間がある。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#13

決断の審議はどのくらいの時間軸? 数日? 数週間?

EN

What's the time frame? Is this a couple days, a few weeks? Like how fast do you have to make this decision?

アームストロング#14

3〜4ヶ月くらいだと思う。温度が上がっていて、もうすぐ訴えられる、と分かっていた。何が悪いのか。守れるルールの提案もない。温度は上がり続け、僕らが訴え、向こうも訴えた。決断した。

EN

Well, I would say that was that was probably over a period of like 3 or 4 months. We could tell the temperature was rising where they were like you're about to get sued. Um, and we, you know, we were like, well, what have we done that's wrong? You haven't proposed any rules that we can actually adhere to. And we knew the temperature was rising. And then we sued them and they sued us. And, uh,

センラ#15

聞いた理由は、イーロンの伝記のすごい話とつながるからだ。イーロンの場合はさらに狂っていて、ほぼ顧客を訴えるようなものだった。NASAから金が欲しいのに、腐敗っぽい配分で別の会社に渡る。元宇宙飛行士の会社が潰れないために、みたいな話。イーロンは「こんな決め方はありえない」と。周りが「どうする?」と聞くと、目を閉じて少し考えて「送らなきゃいけない(訴える)」と。そして勝った。

EN

yeah, we made a made a call.

アームストロング#16

ファウンダーモード、かな。

EN

Yeah. The reason I asked is because this is a great story in one of the biographies of Elon when you just mentioned this. Yeah. And in that case, it's even crazier because you're almost like suing your customer cuz Elon wanted money from NASA and they wind up there was all kinds of, you know, essentially corruption where it's just like I can't remember the amount 250 million or whatever the case was and they gave it to this other guy's company even though and essentially to save this guy who used to be either a former astronaut or in like working for NASA and he's like well his company will go out of business if we don't give him the money and Elon's like this is insane. That that can't be the way we're making decisions and so they tell the story where he's sitting there and they're like what are we going to do Elon? and he like closes his eyes and he's thinking for a little bit. He's like, "We have to send them." And they wind up, you know, winning

センラ#17

ミッション駆動、と君が言ったのが面白い。ミッションというレンズで見ると、決断が単純になる。

EN

founder mode, I guess. You know,

アームストロング#18

長期視点もある。数年の短期的痛みでも、アメリカに業界が作れ、経済的自由という会社のミッションが進むなら、それでいい。個人的にはもう、働かなくても生きていける。結果を達成したいからやっている。規制当局に違法に近い形で業界全体を殺されたら、その結果には近づかない。僕から見ればただの後退だ。

EN

well, you you just said like mission driven. Like this is what's very fascinating about you where it's just like, well, I have a mission that I'm on and so if you're looking at your decisions through that lens, it kind of simplifies like what you're doing.

センラ#19

これは上場後の話?

EN

Yeah. And I have a long-term perspective on it, too. like if it's going to be short-term pain for a few years while we're going through this, but it allows the industry to actually be built in the United States and help create more economic freedom, which is the mission of the company, then I'm fine with that. You know, I feel like personally, I'm well off. Like I I'm I'm in this at this I don't have to work a day of my life. I'm doing this because I actually want to achieve the outcome at this point. And so it wouldn't have helped me achieve the outcome uh if we'd let this regulator unlawfully kill the whole industry in the United States. That would have just been a setback from my point of view.

アームストロング#20

そう。

EN

This happened after you were public.

センラ#21

だから資源も会社も積めていた。上場前だったら、戦う金はあった?

EN

Yeah. So you have accumulated resources. Your company has a lot more resources. If this would have occurred before, would you have had the money to fight it?

アームストロング#22

たぶんなかった。実際、そのローフェアで死んだスタートアップは多い。僕らだけを訴えたんじゃない。暗号企業をたくさん訴えて、多くが潰れた。結果としてUAEやバハマなどの経済発展には寄与した——業界がオフショアに移ったから。でもアメリカには壊滅的だった。法務関連でかかったのは、だいたい5,000万〜1億ドルの範囲だと思う。

EN

Probably not. In fact, a lot of startups did die as a result of that lawfare. I mean, he didn't just sue us. He sued he sued a whole bunch of crypto companies and a lot of them unfolded. So, um, in many ways, he actually did a lot for the economic development of places like the UAE and the Bahamas and places like that because a lot of the industry moved offshore, but it was incredibly damaging to America. I think the total amount we spent on legal and all that was maybe in the 50 to 100 million range as a result of that law firm

センラ#23

その一件だけで?

EN

on that one thing.

アームストロング#24

そう。株価へのダメージは、たぶん100〜200億ドル、あるいはそれ以上。数年、株に巨大な下押し圧力がかかった。あと、僕らは勝った。罰金は1ドルも払っていない。会社のやり方を一つも変えていない。新政権下でSECが取り下げ、複数の判事がSECの振る舞いを恣意的・気まぐれ(arbitrary and capricious)だと意見を出した。オフィスに、SECを訴えて勝った記念の小さなものが飾ってある。

EN

Yeah. But the damage to the stock was probably I don't know 10 20 billion maybe more. You know it was a it was a massive downward pressure on the stock for a period of a couple years. Oh and I should mention we uh we won that case. Uh it was so we didn't we didn't pay a single dollar a single dollar in fines. We didn't have to change a single thing about the company. the judge um or actually the SEC uh uh withdrew it in under this new administration and um several judges actually uh published opinion saying that the SEC behaved in an arbitrary and capriccious manner. So I have a nice little um uh thing in my office commemorating that winning winning our case suing the SEC. That's incredible. One of the things I love most about the conversations I have with Brian Armstrong is how focused he is on making the best possible product he can for his customers. Obsess over customers is a maxim that is repeated by Jeff Bezos and you definitely see that with Brian. It also is the same trait that I see in my friend Kareem who is the co-founder and CTO of RAMP. Ramp is the presenting sponsor of this podcast and Kareem is one of the greatest technical minds working in finance today. Kareem is obsessed with crafting a highquality product and using the latest technology to constantly create better experiences for his customers. Ramp has one of the most talented technical teams in finance and they use rapid, relentless iteration to make their product better every day. In the last year, RAMP has shipped over 300 new features. Ramp is completely committed to using AI to make a better experience for their customers and automate as much of your business's finances as possible. Many of the fastest growing and most innovative companies in the world are running their business on RAMP. Make sure you go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time and money today. Let AI chase your receipts and close your books so you can use your time and energy building great things for your customers. Get started today by going to ramp.com. Where did you get this long-term perspective from? I think it was from com trying a bunch of short-term things and then realizing that I started some companies like in college and um I realized that everything is difficult right and it doesn't even if you're running like a a sandwich shop or something like it's it's difficult like you have to find people who you know employees don't show up on time and the food and the vendors and the margin compression because there's like a million other sandwich shops like and so if you're going to do something you might as well it's going to take you like a decade or two or three like to really start to have an impact. You might as well pick something that you care about. That's like the really big thing. You know, it it always bothers me a little bit when I talk to entrepreneurs and they tell me the thing they're working on and I'm like, "Okay, what do you really want to do?" Like my big thing is I really want to do this. In their mind, it's like a little too ambitious. It's a little too difficult. They need more capital. Part of me is thinking like, "Man, you should just go for that now because it's gonna you could spend the next two decades of your life working on this thing you're just talking about now." and you might as well work on the thing that'll actually have a major impact if it's actually if it works. So, are you optimizing for impact? I think so. Yeah. I mean, I think early on in my like I was I I was kind of shy and introverted as a kid and I was like a little on the autism spectrum and stuff. So, I think I was just trying

センラ#25

すごい。

---

EN

You keep saying that. We've talked enough. You're you're not autistic to me.

センラ#26

長期視点はどこから来た?

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#27

短期のことをたくさん試して、すべてが難しいと気づいたからだ。大学で会社をいくつか始めて、サンドウィッチ屋でも難しい——人が時間どおりに来ない、食材、ベンダー、マージン圧縮、競合が山ほど。何かをやるなら、本当にインパクトが出るまで10年、20年、30年かかる。だったら、本当に気にしているものを選んだほうがいい。

起業家に「何をやっているの?」と聞いて、「本当はこれがやりたい」と出てくることがある。頭の中では野心的すぎる、難しすぎる、資本が足りない、と。僕は思う——今それをやれ。この20年を、いま話している「仮の」ものに使うくらいなら、本当に大きなインパクトを持つものに使ったほうがいい。

EN

How do you master your autism? Are you just saying you're autistic? Cuz it's like

センラ#28

インパクトを最適化している?

EN

cuz trendy and cool now. [laughter] No, it's actually like, you know, that's a good way to get a venture check is like to be on the spectrum. Um I mean, we're not raising money, but uh

アームストロング#29

そうだと思う。子供の頃は内気で内向的で、少し自閉スペクトラム寄りだった。

EN

I introverted for sure, but I'm introverted, too.

センラ#30

それ何度も言うね。何度も話しているけど、僕には自閉には見えない。

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#31

マスクしている。マスキングという話がある。

EN

I hate when people in the comments think I'm autistic because I read all the time. I'm like, I'm not autistic, man. [laughter]

センラ#32

どうやって「マスター」するの? 今トレンドだから言ってるの?

EN

Um I think I'm somewhere on the spectrum. You know, I've taken some online tests and things like that and there there are things like where, you know, I have difficulty like reading uh people's faces and emotions sometimes and you know, I kind of can get over stimulated by like loud sounds and lights and you know, so there's like kind of classic signs like that, but it's not debilitating at all. I actually find it to be like it is a it's a strength in the sense that like I can just endlessly f like focus on um interesting work almost like for 12 hours a day I just find it to be I I wouldn't say like effortless it depends depends on what kind of work I'm doing like if I'm if I have to just do a bunch of like 12 hours of people management hard conversations like that's pretty taxing but if I'm just cons like writing code or write reading things on my computer or just like digesting cool content on the internet. I can just do that and endlessly. So, there is like um any I wouldn't say you have to be autistic to have that, but there's certain things like that. I just find it endlessly fascinating.

アームストロング#33

ベンチャーの小切手をもらうのにスペクトラムがいい、みたいな冗談もあるけど。内向的なのは確かだ。

EN

Well, you definitely have the ability to sit with like a non-conensus opinion for a long period of time.

センラ#34

僕も内向的だ。コメントで「いつも本読んでるから自閉だ」と言われて困る。違うよ、と。

EN

Yes, that so that's the other thing which I don't know if this is an autism spectrum thing, but it Yeah, I I think more some people are like a little more concerned with social cohesion or what other people think. And so there is a part of me that's just like if I see something that's just wrong and um not in line with what I want to accomplish long term around, you know, civilizational progress and these things, it's I don't I don't care being disliked. I don't really care that much about being disliked for it. And I know that it'll piss people off. So there are a handful of things like this that I've done in in Coinbase which I think people consistently remarked to me like, "Wow, that was really unique." And to me, it didn't seem that unique, but like this mission first blog post I put out where we said the company's going to be apolitical during, you know, 2021, all that madness or suing your your regulator, right? These are things which most people probably wouldn't do cuz they're they're afraid of being disliked. And I it's not that I like being disliked. It actually causes me a fair amount of stress, too. But I don't let that stop me from doing what I think is the right thing.

アームストロング#35

スペクトラムのどこかにはいると思う。オンラインのテストなどもやった。人の顔や感情を読みにくいことがある。大きな音や光で過刺激になりやすい。古典的なサインはある。でも生活を壊すほどではない。むしろ強みでもある。面白い仕事に、ほぼ1日12時間、延々と集中できる。全部が楽というわけじゃない。12時間ずっとピープルマネジメントや難しい会話だと消耗する。でもコードを書いたり、読んだり、ネットで良いコンテンツを消化したりは、延々とできる。自閉でないとできないわけじゃないが、そういう面がある。

EN

So, I recently reread that blog post. Can you remember the context of what you were thinking when you were writing it? Because you look back now and a lot of people are like, "Of course." Like you would just focus on the mission of the company. What is the point of having a company if you don't have a mission, right?

センラ#36

非コンセンサスな意見を長いあいだ持ち続けられる能力は、確実にある。

EN

You read it today, it's like fairly innocuous,

アームストロング#37

そう。それがもう一つ。自閉スペクトラムと関係あるかはわからないが、社会的結束や他人の目を気にしすぎない部分がある。文明の進歩や長期で達成したいことに反していて、明らかに間違っていると思ったとき、嫌われることをあまり気にしない。嫌われるのは知っている。Coinbaseでやってきた、人が「すごいユニークだ」と言うことのいくつか——2021年の狂騒の中でのミッション・ファーストのブログ、規制当局を訴えること——は、嫌われるのが怖くて多くの人がやらないことだ。嫌われるのが好きなわけじゃない。ストレスもかかる。でも、正しいと思うことを止めるほどにはさせない。

EN

right?

センラ#38

最近そのブログを読み直した。書いたときの文脈を覚えてる? 今読むと「もちろんそうだろ」と言う人が多い。ミッションのない会社に意味があるか、と。

EN

But back then, I remember the response. People were going crazy.

アームストロング#39

今読むと、かなり無難だ。

EN

Yeah. It's really funny. If you go look at it now, it's like,

センラ#40

当時の反応は狂っていた。

EN

what's the big deal? I mean, it's kind of a boring blog post in some ways, right? But yeah, at that time, um, I feel like there was this mass hysteria or something that had like taken over the country. I mean, the George Floyd thing had happened. people were covid had happened so people were isolated they weren't getting in person as much with folks and feeling a sense of hey we're all on the same team we trust each other and you know increasingly at these town halls that we would host as a company usually people would ask questions about like our products and our competitors and regulators and and then we increasingly would be getting these questions about um social issues happening in the world um in this case like police brutality with George Floyd but all kinds of things like you Middle East or whatever, gun control, you know, and we it became like almost like I realized there was this element within this in the company that really wanted to get in front of the company with a microphone and like see if they could make the executive team squirm somehow. Um, and you know, we had this culture of this open mic thing, but I realized that later we actually don't really do that. We just have people presubmit questions and if we think we take hard questions, but if they're like just way off topic or someone's pet issue, we just don't we don't entertain that. it's we don't allow one person to kind of derail 3,000 other people. So, it was in that context that the company was going through this and somebody at a town hall um asked the question like are we going to support Black Lives Matter at Coinbase? I basically said, I don't know if know enough about it, but I'll look into it like move on to the next question. And they kind of held the mic and they said like that's not good enough. I need to know if we at this company are going to stand for this or not. And I said I don't know. I'm not I haven't looked into it. Right. And this erupted in Slack and basically 300 employees did a walk out in protest. Um, if you remember at this time like every company in America was posting proBLM

アームストロング#41

今見ると「何が問題だったの?」くらい退屈な投稿でもある。当時は国を覆うような集団ヒステリーがあった。ジョージ・フロイド、コロナで孤立し、対面で「同じチームだ」という信頼が薄れていた。タウンホールでは、ふつうはプロダクトや競合や規制の質問だったのが、世界の社会問題——警察の暴力、中東、銃規制——が増えた。会社の前でマイクを持って、経営陣を困らせたい要素がいる、と気づいた。

オープンマイク文化があったが、今は事前提出にし、難しい質問は取るが、完全に話題外れや個人のペットイシューは取り上げない。一人が3,000人を脱線させない。その文脈で、タウンホールで「CoinbaseはBlack Lives Matterを支持するか?」と聞かれた。十分知らない、調べると言って次の質問へ。相手はマイクを離さず「それでは足りない。この会社として立つのか立たないのか知りたい」と。Slackが爆発し、だいたい300人がウォークアウトした。あの頃、アメリカ中の会社が親BLM声明を出していた。

EN

statements. So I never had a walk out of employees at the company before. I didn't even know what that meant. They all just kind of closed their laptop in a remote in a remote environment, I guess.

センラ#42

ウォークアウトって、リモート中?

EN

Wait, so wait, are these are these this is not in person?

アームストロング#43

コロナ中のリモートだ。

EN

This is all remote during co Yeah.

センラ#44

じゃあウォークアウトは、ノートPCを閉じる?

EN

Okay. So the walk out is close my laptop.

アームストロング#45

ベッドルームからリビングへ、みたいなものだ。CEOとして、会社の信頼を持っているつもりだったのに、僕のコメントで働くのを拒否すると言われる。混乱した。この会社は警察の暴力と何の関係もない。何が起きている?

経営陣で部屋に入り、「この瞬間は敏感で、リーダーの立ち位置を安心させたい」と言われた。BLMが何を掲げているかも後で調べた。警察の資金削減などを支持していて、単純な答えではなかった。48時間ほどで声明を出し、「万人の平等を支持する」などと書いて人は戻った。でも何かが深く間違っていると感じた。自分を妥協させた気がした。何が起きているか分からなかった。

社員と話し、ジョナサン・ハイトの『The Coddling of the American Mind』などを読んだ。大学キャンパスが活動家を育て、それが職場に流れ込み、会社のミッションを進めるより、社会問題で権力を監視し会社を改革するのが仕事だ、と感じている、という話だ。僕はブログの草稿を書き始めた——ここではそれをやらない。ホットな社会問題に飛びついて、何もせず気分のいい声明を出す会社にはならない。すでに大事なミッションがある。経済的自由を増やすことだ。それほど大きなことにインパクトを出すには何十年もかかる。それに集中しよう。仕事の外では抗議でも左右でも何でもいい。職場の中では、ミッション——暗号と経済的自由——に関わる以外は政治的にならない。

一部は怒るだろうと分かっていた。草稿を読んだ社内の人は「出すな」と懇願した。

EN

Yeah, but we were like

センラ#46

社内? 外のファウンダーにも送った?

EN

going go from my bedroom to my living room now.

アームストロング#47

社内だ。ボードや誰かには送ったかもしれない。友達に話した程度で、外の人に投稿そのものを読ませた記憶はあまりない。とにかく出した。方向に合意できていない状態を作ってしまった、と分かっていた。卵の殻の上を歩いていた。反対が50%に見えたが、実際は非常に声の大きい1%の少数派だったと思う。方向に合わない人には、良い退職パッケージを出し、金曜までにフォームで受け入れるようにした。5%が退出を取った。事前の賭けでは、50%辞めるかも、という感触すらあった。

EN

Yeah. Yeah. And I was like, "Okay, this is weird." I mean, as a CEO, I'd never had I felt like I had the confidence of the company or whatever. And now people are saying they don't they refuse to work at this company based on my comment. And I I found this very confusing actually, maybe a little that autism spectrum. I was like, I'm confused like this company has nothing to do with police brutality or anything. You know, what is going on here? And u we kind of got in the room as an executive team and um I asked them a few questions like hey people are very sensitive in this moment. They need to feel reassured about where their leaders stand and and I was like what does BLM even stand for? You know I don't and like we went and looked into that. Um later I found out by the way that they they support defunding the police and like all these other things. It was not a very simple answer. Um and so you know I I didn't really know what to do. So after about 48 hours or so, we put out a statement and we said, "Um, okay, I guess we support equality for all people and all these things and people came back to work." But I felt something was deeply wrong. I felt like I had compromised something about myself and I didn't understand what was happening. And so I started to go talk to a bunch of employees in the company and read a bunch of these books like Jonathan Heights book um and others. And which is the Jonathan Height book?

センラ#48

当時もし50%辞めていたら?

EN

Something of the American mind, the Codling of the American Mind I think. Yeah. He was talking he basically talks about how in these college campuses there's like these they're training activists in these college campuses and um it's now spilling into the workforce and they they feel that their job is not to like join a company and advance its mission. They felt like their job was to join a company and hold it hold truth to power and hold it to account for these broader societal issues and actually reform the company as an activist. I essentially started drafting this blog post and I said I don't we're not going to do that here. You know, like we're not going to be a company that just tries to jump into whatever the current hot social issue is and make a bunch of feel-good statements without actually doing anything. We already have an important mission, which is increasing economic freedom. And it takes decades of work to try to make an impact on something that big. So, let's stick to the thing that we think is important in the world. And outside of work, people can do whatever they want. You can go protest, you can be left or right or whatever. Um, but just inside the workplace, we're not going to be political. we're just going to f unless it has to do with our mission crypto and economic freedom, then we'll be very political and you know engaging for litigation and things like that. So, I knew it was going to piss some people off. Um, and I actually some people when they read the draft post before I sent it, they said like, "Do not post this." They like begged me not to post it.

アームストロング#49

全部作り直した。ここが重要で、創業者と会社の「維持管理者」は違う。ゼロ、ノートPC一台から始めた。10人、100人、1,000人のときもいた。2,000から1,000になっても大したことじゃない。必要ならまたノートPCに戻れる。

リー・クアンユーのスピーチがある。シンガポールの創設者で、航空管制や航空会社のストに直面したときの話だ。「Iron in veins(血管に鉄)」で検索してほしい。テーブルの向こうで航空を止めると脅され、「仕事に戻れ。国を潰させない。やらなければ、ゼロから全部作り直す覚悟がある。シンガポールを治める者は、僕の血管に鉄があることを知れ」——毎回鳥肌が立つ。ああいう動画を見て、リーダーとしてこれが必要だ、と感じていた。方向を示し、乗れないなら去っていい、でも僕らはこっちへ行く。それがリーダーシップだ。

EN

People inside your company or you sent it to like other founders?

センラ#50

二つ気になった。長期——ブログでも何度も、世界を変えるには何十年、と。もう一つ、混乱したときの第一反応が、本を読み人に話を聞くことだ。混乱をどう解く?

EN

Uh, inside the company.

アームストロング#51

全部やる。本はすごい。8時間読んでキーの洞察が一箇所、ということもある。でも今は、アクセスできる人に電話するほうが速い。10年考えてきた人なら、30秒で必要なことを説明してくれる。本能にも従う。CEOの仕事は無限にスケジュールされ、採用、投資家、プロダクトレビュー……でも時々、鼻を追う必要がある。何かが気になる。このチームは舵がない、このポリシーは信用できない——掘ると価値が出せる。

EN

Okay.

センラ#52

「鼻を追う」は直感?

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#53

直感であり、パターンマッチングだ。ドキュメント、Slack、レポートを常に取り込んでいて、「それ、変な話を三回目だ。掘ろう」となる。

EN

Did you send it to anybody outside Coinbase for?

センラ#54

この番組でいちばん好きな会話の一つがトビ・ルトケだ。ランチでも話した。みんなの「お気に入り創業者のお気に入り」みたいな人。ドイツのエンジニアでデータ駆動だと思うと、ビジュアライゼーションやアファメーション、全部直感の話で驚いた。

Coinbase以前に始めていた会社では、長期志向が足りなかった。Coinbaseでは最初から近い長期志向があった。その差は?

EN

Um, I might have sent it to the board or someone like that. I'm not sure if I sent it to anybody out. I think I might have told a few of my friends what I was up to, but they didn't read the post.

アームストロング#55

うまくいかないプロジェクトや、シングルヒット止まりを十分試して、すべてが難しいと分かった。大学を出て起業家になりたいと思っていた頃のメンタリティは、「年10万ドルくらいパッシブで入ればすごい。時間が全部空く」くらいだった。その先の計画はあまりなかった。

EN

Okay.

センラ#56

何年頃?

EN

Yeah. And yeah, and so uh I decided to do it anyway and I I knew people were going to upset and so we put out this we said anybody who's not okay with this new direction, you know, I basic I had failed to create alignment in the company about where we were going and I was kind of walking on eggshells around whenever people would ask me this. So it people were confused about where where we stood and there was maybe like it felt like 50% of the company was was against this but I think in reality it was like one it's a very vocal 1% minority and there was other people who were sympathetic to that cause anyway we put out the post and I said anybody who's not aligned with this new direction we'll give you a good ex severance package um you can fill out this form and accept it by Friday or something and 5% of the company took the exit package we we were having bets beforehand we we didn't know we thought maybe 50% of the would resign or something like it felt like that was

アームストロング#57

卒業は2005年。

EN

what would have happened at that time if 50% resigned.

センラ#58

ティム・フェリス読んでた?

EN

We would have built it all back, you know, and this this is actually a very important point because I think that there's a big difference between like a founder and a and a presider of a company, right? Like I I know that I could build it back because I started it when it was just me on a laptop, right? And I and I was there when it was 10 people and 100 people and a thousand people. And if we need to go from 2,000 to 1,000, I that's not a big deal to me. You know, I could go back to being on my laptop again if I had to, right? And there's actually there's this great Lee Kuanu speech that he gave. He was he's the founder of Singapore, you know, and I guess he he was dealing with a a strike that was happening, I think, from the air traffic controllers or the airline or something like that. But there's this great speech if you if you Google Lee Kuanu um iron [clears throat] iron in veins, you know which one I'm talking about. And he he basically he says like in this speech, it kind of gives me chills every time where he's he's like, you know, I I sat across the table from them and they were threatening to like shut down the airline and everything. And he said, get back to work and you know, or and like I will not allow you to bring this country down and if you don't do it, I'm prepared to rebuild it all from scratch again. And he said, "Anyone who rules Singapore, you know, has to look look at me and know that I have iron in my veins. Like I will rebuild it all from scratch, right?" And so I was watching like videos like that. Um, and I was like, "This is what this is what I need to do as a leader." Like it was very it was very inspiring. So there are moments like that um that you have to stand up and say, "We're going this direction and if you don't if you're not on board with it, it's okay. You can leave, but we're going this way." That that's leadership. There's two interesting things that popped out in what you just said. I want to go to the long term. Again, you have this long-term orientation. You me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me mentioned multiple times in the blog post. You're like we're trying to change literally change the world and that's going to take multiple decades. Want to go to that one second. But I like how you said like I was confused like what is going on here? So you're not your first instinct when you're confused you start reading books, you start talking to people. What do you do to try to to like to essentially alleviate the confusion because you're like oh I don't know what's going on. I'm going to read Jonathan Heights book for example.

アームストロング#59

読んでいた。『週4時間だけ働く』の世界観だ。前から似たことを考えていたが、あの本はまさにそれだった。大学で最初に本気で始めたのは家庭教師マッチングのUniversity Tutor。図書館のバイトは時給7〜8ドル、高校生の家庭教師は時給60ドルくらい。自分でやり、他の大学生と高校生をマッチするWebアプリをルームメイトと作った。第一原理で考えたわけじゃない。教育に特別情熱があったわけでもない。パッシブ収入とスケールが欲しかった。惑星間文明など、その時点では視野になかった。時給60ドルを、友達10人分に広げたいだけだった。

卒業後もヒューストンで賃貸を直して投資っぽいことをしたり、いろいろやった。あるときセス・ゴーディンの『The Dip』を読んだ。今読むと単純かもしれないが、当時は強力だった。初心者とトップ1%のあいだに大きな谷があり、楽しくなくなった中盤でたいてい辞める、と。不動産を10〜20年やるか? 教育か? 違う。紙に書いた——成功がほとんど見えなくても、次の20年やるほど情熱があるものは何か。思いついたのはテック起業だけだった。だからシリコンバレーに移り、他を全部畳み、小さな賃貸も売った。その決断から数年でCoinbaseが生まれ、約7年で評価額10億ドル級になった。長期の大きなものにオールインする、と決めた方向転換だった。

EN

Yeah. All the above. I mean it's I read books and books are amazing. I I think sometimes it can take reading like you know as you know it's like read for eight hours to get to that one part. Oh that's the key insight you know. So actually calling people I think is faster if you have access to them especially earlier in my career I didn't have access but now I I feel like I can get access to more people and it's often just a shortcut like if you know the right person to call who's been thinking about that or working on that for 10 years they can explain to you in 30 seconds what you need. Oh my gosh. Like that's the connection of course. Like so yeah, that's exactly what I do. And I just I'm following my instinct a lot of the time. Like a lot of a lot of your job as CEO is, you know, your day can just get infinitely scheduled and you're just like trying to hire the right people and go talk to investors and build, you know, go to product reviews and stuff, but once in a while you just need to follow your nose. If you're like something's bothering me, you know, it's like I've been you're kind of always ingesting information and once in a while you're just like something feels really off over here. Like this team doesn't this team is rudderless like going in no direction or I don't trust what's going on with over here like you know in this policy thing and you you can just go digging you know and occasionally you find things and um you can add a lot of value.

センラ#60

Coinbaseを始めたときから、成功したら何十年捧げる、と思っていた?

EN

When you say follow your nose is this intuition?

アームストロング#61

そう思っていた。他のアイデアは難しく、情熱も足りなかった。起業は後退から次の後退へ、熱意を持って進むものだ——チャーチルの言葉もある。次にやるなら、一生やるものにしよう、と。ミルトン・フリードマンやアイン・ランドを読み、自由市場・リバタリアン寄りの考えに入っていた。アルゼンチンに1年住み、ハイパーインフレの国を見た。

EN

Yeah it's it's intuition it's pattern matching. Um, I mean, a lot of times you're just absorbing information like in documents people are writing up and Slack channels and reports and like a lot of information is just being ingested and um, once in a while you start to you're like that's the third time I've heard something weird about that. Like I need to go dig into it. I was actually surprised. Um, one of my favorite conversations I've had so far for the show was with Toby Luke.

センラ#62

なぜアルゼンチンに?

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#63

冒険が必要だった。人生で何をしたいか分からず、一人旅をしたことがなかった。軍隊にも行っていない。本を読みつつ、世界を旅して自分を探した。

EN

Me and you talked about him at lunch and like I always say he's like your favorite founder's favorite founder. like the amount of people that really admire the way he thinks and the way he's building his company and you would think like this German engineer, you know, it's going to be all data driven and like he just talked about like visualization and uh like

センラ#64

美しい国だよね。

EN

affirmations. Yeah, exactly. All intuition. It was actually surprising. It was one of the most fascinating things about this conversation. So explain the difference you thought about um when you were starting the companies before Co Coinbase because you had this long-term orientation almost from the beginning of Coinbase, but that you lacked that in the other businesses that you were starting before that.

アームストロング#65

物理的にはそうだ。経済の話とも結びつく。1900年頃、世界トップ10級の経済だった。南米のパリと呼ばれた。駅があり、牛肉や銅で莫大な富があった。それから約100年の悪い経済政策——政府が人々から富を奪いながら助けていると言い続ける社会主義的政策——で、今は100位前後まで落ちた。トップ10から100位だ。アイランやフリードマンを読みながら、ハイパーインフレが国を破壊し、みんなが未来に悲観的で、かつての壮大な建物がひび割れとツタと落書きで朽ちているのを見た。

次にやることは長期で情熱を持てるものに、と決めた時期と重なる。その1〜2年以内にビットコインのホワイトペーパーを読み、心を奪われた。

EN

I it was really just by trying enough projects that either didn't work at all or were base hits that I realized everything was difficult and I I I think so my mentality in college and coming out of college, I knew that I wanted to be an entrepreneur. I was trying different ideas. My view was, okay, if I can get something to be paying me, you know, I don't know, $100,000 a year passively, that would be incredible because I could somehow free up all my time and then I I don't I don't know what I'd be able to I'd be able to be like passive income, you know, uh, wealthy and I could then go build something else or I don't know. I didn't I didn't really have a plan after that.

センラ#66

ホワイトペーパーは2008年末公開。

EN

What What year was this?

アームストロング#67

僕が読んだのは2010年12月頃だと思う。アルゼンチンから戻り、ベイエリアでテック起業を決め、Airbnbに入り、各国への送金を見ていた。夜と週末にCoinbaseのプロトタイプを始めた。

EN

Oh, I mean this was like I graduated in 2005.

センラ#68

当時、Airbnbはどうやって各国に送金していた?

EN

Were you reading Tim Ferrris?

アームストロング#69

レガシーの決済レールだ。米欧は銀行振込などがまだマシ。ホストへの支払いが必要で、ラテンアメリカなどでは国ごとに現金受け取りサービス——ウエスタンユニオンの別ブランドみたいなもの——があり、手数料はだいたい7〜12%。エクアドルかどこかで、地域に二社のオリゴポリがあり、手数料が文書からまったく読めない。ほぼ腐敗っぽい。だから100ドル送って、向こうにいくら着いたか現地の人に聞いた。顧客に払出額を伝えるためだ。

世界の金融システムがどれほど壊れているか、体感した。各国が独自のプロプライエタリなオリゴポリ。インターネットがそうだったら——他国のWebページを開くのに高い為替手数料、別言語、7日待ち——ありえない。アルゼンチンのハイパーインフレ、Airbnb、本。世界には、速く、安く、許可不要で、分散的なグローバル金融システムが必要だ。少人数が腐敗したりダイヤルをいじって操作できないもの。ホワイトペーパーを初めて読んだときの頭の中はそれだった。

EN

Yes. Yes. So Tim Ferrris had a big thing on this. Yes. There was the 4-hour work week, like that whole thing. I I was kind of thinking about it even before that, but the 4-hour work week was was definitely that. Like the first company I really started um in college was this tutoring company because I had been tutoring uh high school kids while while I was in college to make extra money. And like working at the working at the library, you got paid I forget it was like $7 or $8 an hour, but if you were tutoring high school kids, you could make like $60 an hour. I was like, "This is crazy." So, I was tutoring kids for a while and then and then I realized I could match my other college students with other um high school kids and I so I built I built like this simple web app which was like a tutor finding tutor matching service called University Tutor and I was basically building this in college with like another friend of mine a roommate and I didn't think about it from first principles. It wasn't like I wasn't particularly passionate about tutoring or education. I was just trying to make some passive income essentially and scale it, right? And so it would have never occurred to me at that moment to like I didn't have the wherewithal to zoom out and say, you know what, we need to become an interplanetary species. I should make rockets, you know, or like I was like, what are you talking about? Like I'm never, you know, I'm just trying to make like go from $60 an hour to like have 10 of my friends be hired by their, you know, get get jobs, too. So, you know, I went through that process. Um, the tutoring company is its own little story. And then, you know, I I tried a couple of other do ideas like that after college, too. Like, I had a couple of like I I got like these rental houses in Houston and I was like refurbishing them and I was trying to do build like a little real estate investment thing. I was doing a bunch of stuff and at some point I actually I remember I read this book by Seth Goden called The Dip. I don't know if you've ever seen that book.

センラ#70

経済についての個人哲学があり、キャリアはテック起業に捧げ、送金の実問題を見ている。そして夜と週末にCoinbase。

EN

Yeah, I read it a long time ago.

アームストロング#71

いい要約だ。

EN

Yeah. It's it's actually like pretty simple book. I don't know if it would do anything for me today, but at the time when I read it, it was um pretty powerful idea. And he he basically was just saying, you know, there's a big dip between being a beginner and and and like the top of your field where you make, you know, the top 1% and like most people quit in the middle cuz it's not fun after you're a beginner. There's just like a 10,000 hours and all these kind of things. And I remember thinking, do I really want to be doing real estate in like 10, 20 years? I was like, no. Do I do I do I care enough about education or, you know, I was like, I don't think that either. So I I was I literally had like piece of paper. I was right. What are the things I am passionate enough about where I would do it for the next 20 years even if even if I saw little or no success? And the only thing the right I could think of was like tech entrepreneurship. That was like the only thing I could really think of. And so that was a very clarifying decision where I decided all right I need to move to Silicon Valley because that's where tech entrepreneurship happens. I need to shut down all the other stuff I'm doing because those are just little short-term games. I sold off all these little rental rental properties. And you know, within a few years of that decision, moving to Silicon Valley, Coinbase had been founded. And I think within 7 years of that decision, Coinbase had a billion dollar valuation. It was like a huge direction and change in my life. I was just like, I know what's the big thing is longterm and I'm going to just go all in on it. And all the decisions led to that. At the time you started Coinbase, did you think if it succeeds, this is something I'm going to dedicate a few decades of my life to doing even at that point?

センラ#72

それが仕事だからね。

EN

I I remember I did think that. Yeah. because I had tried a couple of these other ideas that were kind of um they were they were difficult and I wasn't actually passionate about it. And so you a lot of entrepreneurship you're just like moving from one setback to the next with enthusiasm or whatever. There's that Winston Churchill quote. So I was like okay if I'm I realized how hard it was to do those businesses. So I was like the next thing I try I need to make sure it's something that I'm like I'm really into for the for a lifetime right and I had been reading a lot of um books like like Milton Friedman about economics and um like Ein Rand and stuff and I was like okay I was it was getting kind of into these like free market like libertarian ideas and I was also living in Argentina for a year that was a whole piece of the story where I got to see like a hyperinflation country and

アームストロング#73

ハッスルが必要だった。Airbnbはロケットで長時間働き、すごいチームから学んでいた。でも次は自分の会社を作りたかった。だいたい夜7時までAirbnb、帰宅して夕食、8時半から真夜中まで週5でスタートアップ。会社の時間・機材は使わない。自分のノートPC。日曜もときどき。一日休みを取りつつ、ひたすら磨いた。

何から始めるか分からないときは、何かから始める。大学の友人とAndroidのビットコインウォレットを出して、やり方が違うと分かった。Googleを辞めて共同創業してくれと誘ったが、まだだった。次にクラウド型ビットコインウォレットのプロトタイプ——それがCoinbaseになった。Rubyでビットコインノードを再実装してDBにつなぐなど、夜と週末にやりながら共同創業者を探し、「共同創業者デート」もした。

EN

why did you go to Argentina? Well,

センラ#74

なぜ共同創業者が必要だと思った?

EN

with women.

アームストロング#75

ポール・グレアムのYCエッセイをたくさん読んでいた。YCに入りたかった。ヒューレットとパッカード、ラリーとセルゲイ——例外はあるが、会社作りは難しすぎるので、補完スキルがあると成功率とYC合格率が上がる、という話だった。

EN

No.

センラ#76

面白いのは、共同創業者がいても、結局「一人」が会社を駆動していることが多いことだ。歴史を読むとそう見える。YCは共同創業者が必要と言うが。

EN

Okay.

アームストロング#77

ウォズとジョブズだよね。長期でインパクトが大きかったのはジョブズでも、初期のAppleにウォズなしは難しかった。約1年半共同創業者を探して失敗し、アプリを公開し、YCに入った。話がある。

EN

No. Sadly, no. But it was um I needed some adventure. I didn't know what I wanted to do with my life. And so, I just I had never traveled alone. And so, I basically just went abroad and like tried to put myself outside my comfort zone. I had never been in the military. I'd never traveled I had never like traveled abroad by myself. Um I was kind of just reading a bunch of books and like I I need to go travel the world and like see find what I'm trying to do with my life.

センラ#78

ソロでYCに?

EN

And um Yeah,

アームストロング#79

面白い話で、ベン・リーブ(blockchain.info、今のblockchain.com)と一緒に応募した。彼はYCを知らなかったが、英国から飛んでもらい、コーヒーして面接へ。長い知り合いと共同創業すべき——これは悪いやり方だ。とにかくその前提で受かった。3ヶ月でうまくいかないと分かり、YCの助けで難しい会話をし、プログラムはソロで進めた。シードを調達し、フレッド・エアサムが連絡をくれ、非公式に一緒に働き始め、うまくいき、共同創業者になってもらった。続く3〜5年の瀕死を乗り越えるのに、フレッドなしではCoinbaseは成功しなかったと思う。絶対的なキラーで、補完スキルの組み合わせがプロダクト・マーケット・フィットと軌道投入を可能にした。

---

EN

it's beautiful. Argentine is a beautiful country.

センラ#80

初期のCoinbaseには面白い話がある。フレッドが、ビットコインの取引ごとに損していると見抜いた、と聞いた。

EN

Yeah, it's Well, it's I learned e from an economics point of view like

アームストロング#81

本当だ。僕はコンピュータサイエンスと経済学。フレッドも同じだが、卒業後はゴールドマン・サックスでFXトレーダー。僕はエンジニア/失敗中の起業家脳、彼は金融トレーダー脳。資金の流れを全部分析し、時間リスクなどの条件をマッピングして、本当に損していた。一緒に働き始めて最初の3週間くらいで価値を出した好例だ。

EN

not like that.

センラ#82

でも瀕死ではなかった?

EN

I meant the physical beauty.

アームストロング#83

瀕死ではない。ビジネスモデルと手数料を正しくする話だ。

EN

Well, so it ties together because you know my understanding is actually around the year 1900 or so like like more than 100 years ago. I think 1908 it was like one of the top 10 economies in the whole world.

センラ#84

瀕死の例は?

EN

It was called the Paris of South America.

アームストロング#85

シリーズA前後で、プロダクト・マーケット・フィットは出ていて毎日たくさん使われていた。カスタマーサポートのバックログが巨大で、夜9時から真夜中まで問い合わせ対応。チームはまだ育ち途中。チケットが1,000、2,000、5,000、1万と溜まり、人が激怒していた。

EN

Yeah. It was like the first Latin American country that had a train station. You can see it in these historic buildings. They had like massive wealth, right, from beef and copper and all these things. And then over a period of like a hundred years of bad economic policy of essentially like socialist policies of them the government like stealing wealth from the people while claiming to help them. Um it's now like the hundth richest economy in the world. It went from like top 10 to to hundth. Um, and so I was down there kind of reading, you know, Einran, Milton Friedman and seeing how hyperinflation had like decimated this entire country and everyone was pessimistic about the future and these once grand government buildings were just in these like states of decay, you know, with like cracks and ivy and graffiti on it and stuff. And you know, this was like around that moment where I was like, okay, the next thing I do, it needs to be something I'm passionate about for the long term. And within a year or two of that I had I read the Bitcoin white paper that captivated my attention and then I think

センラ#86

僕もその一人だった。

EN

this is around so Bitcoin white paper published end of 2008.

アームストロング#87

早期ユーザーだったんだ。サポートの遅さは謝る。

EN

Yeah. And I think it December 2010.

センラ#88

ビットコインが載っていて問題があり、住所を調べてサンフランシスコに飛ぼうかと思った。メールに返ってこないから。

EN

Okay.

アームストロング#89

まさにそれが起きた。人がオフィスに現れ始めた。住所はあまり公開していなかったが、写真の背景の建物から特定されて、変な時間に来る。フレッドがゴルフクラブを持ってドアを開けたこともあった。だいたい「なぜウォレットに着かない」で、現金小切手を書いて帰ってもらうこともあった。同時に何万人にも怒られる、を初めて体験した。

EN

Yeah. I had just come back from Argentina. So I was in the Bay Area deciding I wanted to be in tech entrepreneurship. I read the Bitcoin white paper December 2010. I um I'd gotten a job at Airbnb actually and I was seeing how money movement had was happening with them all these different countries and that's when I started working on the prototype for Coinbase nights and weekends.

センラ#90

当時はクレジットカードでビットコインを買えるほぼ唯一の場所だったよね。銀行振込も。

EN

So wait, how did they move money to all these different countries back then? Then

アームストロング#91

銀行パートナーシップと簡単に売買できる導線ができた瞬間、即プロダクト・マーケット・フィットで、需要に追いつくだけだった。

EN

legacy payment rails. So um in the US and Europe it was a little simpler. You could use bank transfers and um so they were accepting payments in then they had to pay out to the host. In many of the countries where they operated, like in Latin America, there would be some local cash pickup service that you could like kind of like a Western Union, but it was different ones in different countries. And they typically had very high fees like 7 to 12%. I remember we were trying to send payouts into I think it was Ecuador or um one of these countries and we were reading that we like there's like a little oligopoly of like two two companies that do this in that you know in the region and we we were like how much money shows up on the other side like what are your fees and the and we we were reading through their documentation we're like we have no idea how it's basically like a borderline corrupt thing and we basically just decided to send $100 and we found somebody there like how much money showed showed up on the other side like [laughter] you know just to like give us some rough sense so we could tell the customer how much their payout was going to be. I mean it was so it gave me such a visceral sense of like how broken the global financial system is. It's like each country is its own little proprietary set of oligopies. Um and imagine like the internet worked like this right it's like oh I want to load a web page from you know another country and they're like you pay a high exchange fee and it comes in like a different language you know and you have to wait seven days or whatever. I realized and due to a couple of these experiences like the Argentina experience with hyperinflation, the Airbnb experience um and reading some of these books that like the world would benefit from a global financial system that was you know fast, cheap, permissionless, uh decentralized. So there was no small group of people who could who could uh be corrupt or like put their fingers on the dials to manipulate it. And so that was what I was thinking about as I read the Bitcoin white paper for the first time.

センラ#92

米国でそれを最初にやった暗号企業?

EN

Okay. So you have you're you're building like your personal philosophy about like economics and what's important there. You know that you want to dedicate yourself to tech entrepreneurship as far as like what your career is cuz you're going to be passionate about that. You want to do something for a long term. And then you're also seeing this real life problem of trying to send money into all these disparate uh you know economies and countries.

アームストロング#93

米国ではそうだと思う。銀行側は別の長い話だ。サイバー事件など瀕死も他にあるが、銀行について言うと——信じられないかもしれないが、最初のCoinbaseアプリには、ビットコインの売買がなかった。インターネット上の支払用ウォレットだと思っていた。保存と送金。Redditから数百人が登録したが、リテンションがなかった。YCが教えるのは、顧客に話を聞き、作り、また聞き、作る、を繰り返すこと。カンファレンスなどに気を散らすな。

登録した3人にメールして電話した。「戻ってこないよね」。「アプリはいいけど、ビットコインを持っていない」。頭の中でカチッと来た。「ここに買うボタンがあったら買った?」。今思うと馬鹿げているが、当時は市場調査だ。「たぶん」。なら、別の取引所で買ってウォレットに入れるんじゃなく、ここで簡単に買えるようにしなきゃ、と。銀行振込やデビットのようにつなぐ必要があった。

銀行に電話すると、「何の話だ。聞いたことない。詐欺みたいだ」か、ビットコインを知っている側は電話を切った。「ビットコイン企業とはやらない」と受話器を叩きつけるように。YCのパートナー——当時サム・アルトマンがYCを回していて、ゲイリー・タンやポール・ブヘイトら——に相談すると、「シリコンバレー銀行に行け。YC企業の口座をたくさん開いている」と温かい紹介をもらった。コンプライアンスが戻ってきて、「君たちはマネー・トランスミッターかもしれない。米国で免許が要る」。電話で「免許があるか、そうでない証明がないと口座は開けない」。調査すると、免許は500万〜1,000万ドル3〜4年。調達は約60万ドルしかない。最悪だ。

「マネー・トランスミッターではないという法的論拠があれば始められるかも」とも言われた。法律事務所を回り、グレーだが論拠はある、条件付きでそうかもしれないという法律意見書を書く、と言ってくれた。5ページで3万ドル。60万調達したばかりで、紙切れに3万は狂っていると思った。でもYCの助言は「口座が開きプロダクトを試せるならやれ」。3万払った。銀行統合のコードは全部自分で書いた。FTPでファイルを送る古めかしい仕組み。ローンチしたらプロダクト・マーケット・フィット。毎日岩を山に押すのではなく、岩が坂を転がり落ち、全力で追いかける側になった。

EN

Yes.

センラ#94

銀行振込で買えるようになった。クレジットカードは?

EN

And then you start working on Coinbase nights and weekends.

アームストロング#95

デビットは1〜2年後だったと思う。振込だけでも顧客が殺到した。銀行から焦った電話も来た。「君たちは60万調達したのに、毎日55万くらい動いている」。顧客口座から引き落とすが、先にビットコインを買わなきゃいけない。キャッシュフロー問題で、残高ほぼ全部を毎日需要に使っていた。銀行の人は「一回のエラーで債務超過になり、銀行も巻き込まれかねない。今すぐ資金調達して口座に金を入れろ。さもないとACHを続けられない。小さなサンドボックスだったのが雑草のように伸びている」と。

日次の買いのグラフ——右肩上がり——だけ持って、ピッチデッキもなく、1週間くらいで次のラウンドを調達し、口座に約2,500万ドルを入れた。

EN

Yeah. Okay.

センラ#96

その2,500万はa16zとRibbit?

EN

Great summary by the way. Yeah. So

アームストロング#97

シリーズAはUnion Square VenturesRibbit。a16zはシリーズB。

EN

I kind of do that for a living. [laughter] Yeah. So, this is where a little bit of that hustle and drive came in because, you know, I was working long hours at Airbnb. They were like rocket ship company. I was learning a lot. Really amazing team. And but I really wanted to build something new for my next company. I still wanted to be an entrepreneur. And so I'd work till like 7:00 p.m. at Airbnb, come home, eat a little dinner, and then from like 8:30 to midnight or something, like 5 days a week, I would work on my startup. And you know, you always have to be very careful. Uh you have to do it on your own separate laptop. Don't do it on company time or company property. Make sure it's separate. But, you know, I I used my own laptop and I sometimes on Sundays I'd work um yeah, as well, right? I'd sort of take one day off, but I was just grinding and I was like, okay, well, I don't I didn't know where to start. So, you kind of just have to start with anything, right? So, first I went and talked to a friend of mine who I went to college with. We built this little Android app for Bitcoin, a Bitcoin wallet. I realized once we shipped that, we had done it the wrong way. I tried to I tried to recruit him to like leave Google and be co-ound with me. He wasn't ready to do that. So, I started working on another prototype that was more of a cloud-based Bitcoin wallet, which eventually became Coinbase. And I had to reimplement like a whole Bitcoin node in um in Ruby just to try to get it to hook up to my database, you know, all these things. So, I was just doing this like nights and weekends while occasionally trying to find a co-founder, you know, going on these co-founder dates. Why did you think you needed a co-founder?

センラ#98

グラフを見せた相手がUSVとRibbit。ミッキー?

EN

Well, the main reason was that I had read a lot of Paul Graham essays from Y Comator and you know, I was I was I really wanted to get accepted into Y Com. It was like the top incubator. it still is in Silicon Valley and Paul had these great essays and one of them had talked about how you know if you look at Huelet and Packard and you know Larry and Sergey and um you know there are exceptions but more often than not like great founders like running building a company is just so difficult it helps to have people with some complimentary skill sets so just to improve my chances of like getting to Y cominator if nothing else and the company eventually succeeding I was trying to find the right person

アームストロング#99

そう。彼とは時間を過ごした。すごくいい人だ。

EN

yeah it's interesting because I feel like there's always even if you have co-founders just like one. It's actually one founder. Like you can start out with two or three or four. And I know YC is like you need a co-founder and like that's like something that's repeated, but if you read the history of entrepreneurship, it's like you start out with three or four or five. There's always one like there's one person that's going that's actually driving the company.

センラ#100

それっぽい。南米で最初の36〜37年を過ごした人だから、ビットコインを早く信じた。

EN

Well, you know, long like it's like Wnjak and Jobs, right? Like I Jobs was clearly the one that had more impact over a long period of time, but there probably wouldn't have been an Apple without W in the early days.

アームストロング#101

ハイパーインフレを見た人はすぐ分かった。米国だけにいた人は「なぜ新しいお金が要る?」だった。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#102

創業者として、当時のプロダクトはウォレットとビットコイン購入だと思っていた。それが全体だと思っていた期間は? すでに拡張を考えていた?

EN

You know, you never know exactly. And um you know like I will say in our in my case like I tried to find a co-founder for about like a year and a half and failed and so I eventually um got the app live and got into Y cominator and there's a whole story there.

アームストロング#103

死に方がたくさんあると知っていたから、まずシンプルなものを動かしたかった。ハッカー、圧倒されて辞めるエンジニア、夜中に三回ページャー、銀行に切られるリスク。次の数ヶ月を生きることで精一杯だった。頭の片隅では、最初のプロダクトがスケールすれば壊せるものは多い、と分かっていた。ホワイトペーパーで興奮したのは、世界の新しい金融システム——グローバルで公正で分散的で、自由市場寄りで、携帯があれば良い金融サービスにアクセスでき、政府がアルゼンチンのようにインフレで富を削れない——の可能性だ。高ポテンシャルは知っていたが、睡眠不足と長時間労働で、次の3ヶ月を生き残ることで埋まっていた。

EN

Did you get into Y cominator as a solo founder?

センラ#104

その期間は何年?

EN

So this is this is another interesting story but I actually applied with um this guy who Ben Reeve who had created blockchain.info which is now blockchain.com and we sort he had never heard of white commentator but I convinced him to fly from the UK. we met, had a coffee, and then we went into the interview, which by the way is a bad idea. Um, you should really co-ound with people you've known for a long time. So, anyway, that we got accepted somehow under that premise. Um, I don't think we mentioned probably that we didn't know each other that long or it didn't come up in the interview or something. We didn't hide anything, but um anyway, it became clear within like 3 months that it was not going to work. And um and so with the help of YC, I kind of went, you know, I had a hard conversation with him about that and we I I went through the program solo. Um anyway, long story short, we went through white com raised the seed round at the end of it and I, you know, I was lucky enough to have Fred Ersome reach out to me and he became uh the first person who I really started working with on it unofficially and then it just started going really well. very complimentary skill sets and I asked him to co-ound and so he became the co-founder of Coinbase and I I actually don't think Coinbase would have succeeded without Fred like if you look at the the subsequent three four or five years there was a lot of like near-death experiences and he is just an absolute killer and so it was that pairing that allowed us to really get to product market fit and like off the launch launch pad into orbit if you will. Brad Jacobs has started eight separate billion-dollar companies. He said, "I've come to know a lot of extremely successful people in my life, and they all have one thing in common. They think differently than most people. All of them, to a person, have rearranged their brains to prevail at achieving big goals in turbulent environments where conventional thinking often fails." What Brad noticed is that great business leaders are pattern spotters. But you can't spot patterns if you can't see all of your data. Most businesses only use 20% of their data. Why? Because 80% of customer intelligence is invisible. It's hidden in emails, transcripts, and conversations. That's where HubSpot comes in. With HubSpot, all of your data comes together so you can see the patterns that matter. This is important because when you know more, you grow more. And that is a pattern that never fails. Visit hubspot.com today. That is hubspot.com.

アームストロング#105

4〜5年くらいで、1週間休んでも会社が爆発しない、と感じられるようになった。

EN

There were some funny stories from the early days of Coinbase. I've heard like Fred identified that you guys were losing money on every single Bitcoin transaction.

センラ#106

当時、どんな会社にしたいかの思考に影響したのは?

EN

Yes, [laughter] that is true. How did how did that happen? I mean, the simple version of it is that I I was a computer science major um and I studied economics and computer science. Fred studied the same thing, but he had gone into work in finance after college. he went to go work at Goldman Sachs as an FX trader and I was working as a software engineer/ entrepreneur, failing entrepreneur. Um, so I had more of like that engineering brain. He had more of like that finance trader brain. And so when he came in and started to analyze all of the flow of funds um on every trade, he was able to map that out. And due to like certain time risks and things, he he actually was correct that he map that out and it was just a set of conditions which I was not as familiar with. So, um, that was a great example of just him adding value in the first probably three weeks we worked together.

アームストロング#107

『PayPal Wars』。ピーター・ティール、イーロン、マックス・レヴチン、デイヴィッド・サックスらが、ビットコインに近いアイデア——許可不要でグローバルな分散マネー——をインターネット上でやろうとしていた。歴史とeBay買収で、結局はクレジットカードのチェックアウト代替に落ち着いたが。Airbnbで働いたことも大きかった。ライス大学(ヒューストン)は素晴らしいがスタートアップ環境はスタンフォード級ではなく、成功スタートアップの内側を見たことがなかった。自分のスタートアップはうまくいっていなかった。Airbnbでは魔法が起き、山火事のように成長し、採用の高い基準、デザイン、意思決定——多くを見た。

最初は台座に載せていた。天才たちだ、と。部屋に入って働き方を見ると、天才でないという意味ではなく、神秘が解け、「似たことを自分もできるかも」と感じられた。今ならイーロン級の野心も刺激になる。Google、Amazonなどからも学び、歴史からも。

EN

But that wasn't like you it wasn't like a near-death experience.

センラ#108

歴史だと?

EN

No, that one wasn't near-death. It was just getting the right um business model and fe

アームストロング#109

ライト兄弟が好きだ。エピソードやった?

EN

an example of a near-death experience.

センラ#110

エピソード228。デイヴィッド・マッカロウの本。

EN

Well, okay. So, an example of a near-death experience was um I think we had we had raised maybe the series A or something like that. Yeah. And we had found product market fit. So there were a lot of people using the site every day and you know we we were having this huge backlog of customer support inquiries like where it would be like every night from like 9:00 p.m. to midnight, we would just try to answer support queries cuz we hadn't we didn't have a customer support team. And um well, we were slowly trying to build it, I should say. Anyway, so we had like a,000 2,000 5,000 10,000 backlog of these customer support tickets and people were getting very angry about all of this because you couldn't respond.

アームストロング#111

それだと思う。人類が百年単位で取り組む大きな問題——狂っているが可能なもの——が好きだ。寿命、核融合、AI……。

EN

Yeah,

センラ#112

ライト兄弟は狂っている。何世紀もの問題を、デイトンの自転車店のささやかな利益で解いた。競合は資格も資金も上で、マッカロウによれば有人動力飛行はだいたい1,500ドルくらい。200倍資金の人もいた。

EN

I was one of those people.

アームストロング#113

そういう大きなアイデアを紙に書き、どれが自分を掴み、自分に独自の寄与があるか見て、行く。それがワクワクする。

話を戻すと——死ななければ、あとで他のプロダクトや成長の道は見える、と。会社の作り方について、他に具体的に考えていたことは?

EN

Okay. You were early early on Coinbase. Okay. [laughter and gasps] Well, apologies for the lack of customer support response

アームストロング#114

ミッションを言語化すること。バリューを書くこと——最初の数百人くらいまでは有機的に、採用した人そのものが文化で、大きくなってから形式化した。ずっと全面接に出られないから。

EN

well back there they had to be weirdos like the people that are into crypto back then [laughter] were not your normal people.

センラ#115

ミッションにいつ到達した?

EN

I don't know. I mean it was once in a while Fred would actually go answer the door holding like a golf a golf club and you know like usually it was somebody who was like man why didn't my crypto hit my wallet and then we were like sometimes we'd write people like a physical check and like okay you need to leave the office anyway that was the first time I'd really experienced having tens of thousands of people angry at you at the same time

アームストロング#116

正確な年は覚えていないが、少なくとも数年後だ。暗号を使わせること自体ではなく、なぜそれが欲しいか。自分の富を奪われない形で持てること。人生でもっと野心的なことに挑戦できる基礎——経済学でいう基本的な財産権。健全な貨幣、基本的財産権、新しいことを試す摩擦の低さ、アップサイドを保てること——そうすれば挑戦する人が増える。それが魅力だった。

米国では銀行口座から金が消えない、を当たり前にしがちだが、世界の多くでは違う。政府の押収、キプロスで最近実際にあった預金からの取り上げ、難民が国境を越えるときに全財産没収、アルゼンチンのような起業の官僚と腐敗と闇市場。米国で富を築く大きな道の一つは住宅ローンだが、アルゼンチンでは富裕層しか不動産を買えない——ローンがなく現金だから。進歩を減速させるやり方は多い。それを短い言葉にしようとして、世界の経済的自由を増やすと書いた。少しマニアックで、読まないと分からない人もいるが、やろうとしていることを包んでいる。暗号はその最良の技術だと思う。

EN

cuz back then it was the only place where you could buy Bitcoin with a credit card right like you could use

センラ#117

当時の採用は? 全面接に出ていた?

EN

Yeah. or a bank transfer

アームストロング#118

最初はミートアップに顔を出し、LinkedInでコールド、一緒に働いた人に連絡。アウトバウンドしかなかった。暗号はニッチで、YCでもホット企業ではなかった。デモデイで60万のシード。数百万調達する会社が並ぶ中、中くらいかやや下。投資も参加も、すでに暗号に興奮していた人だけが「YCを通ってプロダクトが動いてUSVもいる。半ばまともだ」と来た。最初の5〜10人は暗号ゼロットで、賭けてもいい会社だと見た人たち。大きくなるとリクルーティングチームができ、ゼロ金利時代のSFビッグテックと激しく戦い、他拠点やリモートも開いた。採用はそれ自体が巨大なテーマだ。

EN

or a bank transfer, right?

センラ#119

カリム(Ramp)やダニエル(Spotify)と同じく、スパイクで採る? 大企業は中央に寄せて高低を嫌う。創業企業は「この一点で世界一」を採り、極端な性格は引き受ける、と二人とも言う。

EN

Yeah. Once we managed to get that bank partnership set up and an easy way to buy, sell in the US. I mean, we were we had instant product market fit and it was just like trying to keep up with the demand.

アームストロング#120

完全に同意する。履歴書より過去の仕事。面接で何か学び、入ったときよりエネルギーが高く出て、効率的に伝えられ、外れ値の成功を指し示せる——そういう人を採る。CTOをしばらくやったバラージは天才で、かなりエキセントリックだ。フレッドと僕以外の最初の採用はオラフ・カールソン=ウィ。サポートのバックログで、サポート責任者の最終候補が二人。一人はGoogle AdSenseで20〜30人を率いた経歴。紙は完璧だが、面接は低エネルギーで興奮しない。オラフは直前の仕事が文字どおり木こり。大学を出たばかりで、卒論はビットコイン。サマーでスピリチュアルな放浪をして木こりをしていた。インタビューに来る服がなく、途中で買った合わないスーツ。でもめちゃくちゃ頭が良く、情熱的で若く飢えていた。やってみよう、と。彼は後に暗号VCを作り、ビリオネア級になった。紙の上で無資格でも、起業家的で高エージェンシーな人——それが最高の採用の一部だった。トビも似た話をしていた。

EN

Were you the first crypto company to do that

センラ#121

当時ビットコインのRedditをよく読んでいた。みんな「分散だ」と言い、君は「ちゃんとしたビジネスを作る」側で、才能を採るのに摩擦はなかった? 変なビットコインに早く興味を持ち、そのサブカルチャーの中でも逆張りしている——スペクトラムかもしれない、と君が言うのも分かる気がする。

EN

in the US? US. Yeah.

アームストロング#122

「ビットコインの要点は分散では?」とよく聞かれた。プロトコルは分散だ。僕らはアクセスを簡単にしたい。うちを使ってもいいし、他社でもいい。VisaネットワークはVisa一社経由だけだが、メールは分散プロトコルでGmailでもOutlookでもいい。選択がある。批判が何年も続いたので、セルフカストディのウォレットも出した。僕らを一切信頼しなくていい製品。今も成功している。両方大事だ。中央集権型は使いやすさ——パスワードを忘れても金が消えない——と、世界の金の80〜90%が載る機関向けにつながる。機関にセルフカストディを持っていくと「怖い、やらない」となる。エンタープライズ級カストディが欲しく、銀行向けにそれを作って成功した。機関側は市場との会話から。リテールの「簡単で信頼できるもの」は、顧客の前に僕の直感だった。当時セルフカストディを自分のノートPCで回せる平均的な人は少なく、パスワード紛失でビットコインが消えた悲しい話は山ほどある。

EN

Yeah. Exactly.

センラ#123

ジョブズの観察に似ている。最初はホビイスト向けだが、部品を組み立てたい人より、店で買って家電のように使いたい人の市場のほうが千倍、百万倍大きい。簡単にするほど市場が広がる。

EN

How did you get the bank partnership?

アームストロング#124

そのとおり。多くは技術そのものが好きなホビイストから始まるが、暗号がやるのは金融システムを更新し、より良い金融サービスを届けることだ。暗号を使っていると気づかずに使う人も増える。家族に送金したい——ウエスタンユニオンで11%ではなく、即時でほぼ無料。ステーブルコインで。ローンを取りたい——DeFiで安く30秒で承認。銀行に電話して書類だらけより簡単。今のCoinbaseアプリは、暗号以外の株式・コモディティ・予測市場も扱え、ローンやカードもある。より良い金融サービスを作っている。そこから数兆ドル市場に入る。

EN

So, that that's its own whole story. I mean,

センラ#125

何と呼んでいる? Everything app?

EN

um, by the way, there was other near-death experiences around cyber events and things like that we can talk about if you want, but on the um on the bank side, yeah. So, okay, there's another interesting story where we, okay, believe it or not, the first version of the Coinbase app actually, you couldn't buy or sell Bitcoin. Um, I thought we were making a a wallet for payments on the internet and so you could store Bitcoin, you could make Bitcoin payments and this prototype went out and I I remember like a couple hundred people signed up off of Reddit or something like that, but the app was not retaining users, right? And what they teach you in Y Cominator is like go talk to customers, get feedback, and then build the product and talk to customers and build the product and just do that on repeat and don't get distracted by any other like going to conferences or whatever. So I remember I emailed like three of these people who had signed up and I was like, "Hey, I built this app. Can I get on the phone with you?" And in the first few conversations, I was like, "I noticed you didn't come back to the app." And the guy was like, "Yeah, I mean the app was pretty cool, but like I just don't have any Bitcoin." And I remember something kind of clicked in my head and I was like, "Well, if there was if I if there was like a buy button in the app, would you have bought it here?" And it sounds like ridiculous in hindsight, but at the time this was like market research, right? And he's like, "Yeah, probably." And so I was like, "Okay, we got to make a simple way for people to just buy it here. It's not like you go to a separate exchange and then put it in your wallet for actually daily utility or something." And so then I was like, "Okay, we we've got to make it possible to get bank transfers hooked up kind of like PayPal or debit cards." And I remember calling like these different banks and saying hey I want to get integrated into the the bank network in the AC it's called AC in the US. Um, and these banks were either like, "What the heck are you talking about? Like, I've never heard of this thing. It sounds like a scam." Or some of them who had heard about Bitcoin, I remember like hung up on me, you know? They were like um they're like, "We do not work with Bitcoin companies." Like bam, like slamming the phone down, right? And um so I went to the the partners at Y Combinator actually uh one of them was like Sam Alman at the time. He was running he was running uh Y Combinator and like Gary Tan was there. was helping me and these Paul Bukite and these various folks and I remember they said um well why don't you go talk to Silicon Valley Bank like we help we Silicon Valley Bank opens bank accounts for lots of Y cominator companies we have a good relationship there so they kind of warmly introduced me to the right person and they were kind of like h these guys are you know these guys are probably crazy but we like to help Y cominator so let's let's see what we can do and they ran it through their compliance team and their compliance team came back and said we think you might be what's called a money transmitter which means you need to have a license in the United And I remember getting on the phone with them and and they were like, "Well, we can't open this account for you unless you can prove to us that you're not a money transmitter or you have to get a money transmission license I researched was like it was like it was going to cost 5 or 10 million and take about three or four years. And I'd only raised about 600k right now. So, so I was like, "That's not good." Um, but they also said, "Well, if you if you have some legal argument that you're not a money transmitter, maybe we would allow you to get started." And I remember going to a couple law firms and um, one of them agreed. He's like, "There are some arguments that you could make that you're not a money transmitter. It's a little bit of a gray area." And he was like, "I'll write you a legal opinion saying subject to the following terms that you may not be a money transmitter, but it's going to cost $30,000 for this like fivepage piece of paper." And I thought at the time I thought this was crazy. You know, we we'd raised like six $600,000. I was like, $30,000 for a piece of paper, you know. Um, but I was talking with my adviserss at Y Cominator and they were like, well, if this allows you to get the bank account open and you can start to test your your product idea, like do it, you know. So, I paid this guy the 30 grand. We got the account open. I I wrote all the code myself to do like a integrations and you have to FTP these files to the bank and it's like this kind of antiquated system and uh it launched and it had product market fit and it just was then it was like instead of pushing a boulder uphill every day it was like the boulder was rolling down the hill and you were chasing it as fast as you could.

アームストロング#126

Everything exchange。スーパーアプリと合わせる感じかも。

EN

So you could buy Bitcoin through a through a bank transfer. Yeah.

センラ#127

最初からの計画じゃないよね。ベゾスのEverything storeはヘッジファンド時代のコードネームで、本から始めてもマスタープランがあった。Coinbaseは違う?

EN

Could you use credit cards back then or no?

アームストロング#128

違う。経済のより多くがビットコイン上で動く——速く安くグローバル——と感じていた。ステーブルコインも予測市場も予見していなかった。ビットコインが過去10年で最良の資産クラスの一つになり、多くの人が買って持ちたく、いちばん簡単が僕らだった。それが楔になり、金融サービス全般を更新する。初日に全部見えていたと言うのは知的に不誠実だ。ただ、買うだけを遥かに超える可能性は知っていた。各国が独自のお金を刷り高い手数料を取るより、インターネットのネイティブな金融レイヤー——真にグローバルで分散——の上にGDPのより大きなシェアが載る。巨大だと知っていた。どう展開するかは正確には分からなかった。

---

EN

Um no I think debit card came a year or two after that. Yeah.

センラ#129

今、会社の運営はどう考えている? 組織はどう?

EN

Okay. So even that with just the bank transfer. Yeah. Flooded with customers. Yeah. And started to get some very anxious calls from the bank at at certain points, too, because as they they were like, "You guys have raised $600,000." And they're like, "Every day there was like $550,000, you know, because we we debit these customer accounts to get the money, but we had to pre- buy the Bitcoin." And so we had this um cash flow issue where like we were basically using our entire balance every day just to service the current demand. And they and the I remember the guy from the bank called me kind of frantic. He's like if you just have one error like your whole you're insolvent. And by the way they're they might be on the hook for it too. We might be like at negative a million dollars and just be insolvent and then the bank's on the hook for it. And I remember the guy told me on the phone he's like you need to go raise money like right now and get more money in your account or like we're not going to be able to continue to ser serve you uh on this a network trans transfers. Like you were in this tiny little sandbox but now you're suddenly growing like a weed. And um and I remember we took this graph of like the daily buys. It was just an up and we didn't even have a pitch deck or anything. And we just went out and in like a week raised uh the next round and got um like $25 million deposited in the account with a graph.

アームストロング#130

答え方は多い。素晴らしいプレジデント兼COOのエミリー・チョイがいる。すごいオペレーターで、僕はプロダクト群のマネジメントに集中できる。プロダクト志向のCEOと、オペレーション志向の組み合わせ。テクニカル・ファウンダーと優れたオペレーターを組むと、企業価値がたくさん生まれると思う。オペレーターだけだと効率は上がるが次のイノベーションの波を逃すことがある。ファウンダーだけだと、いつも狂った新ことをやって場所を吹き飛ばすことがある。健全なバランスだ。ザッカーバーグとシェリル、Googleのエリック・シュミットとラリー/セルゲイなど歴史にも例がある。エミリーと僕が両方いることはCoinbaseに大きな価値を生んだ。

EN

Yeah. Cuz we ordinarily you I wouldn't recommend that, but we were sleepd deprived and it it was that's all we had time to do. So we just went and we Yeah. Yeah, we showed them a few pieces of data and we're like, "This is an up in the right graph of demand and the bank's going to close our account in like 2 weeks if we don't get

センラ#131

いちばんエネルギーが出るのはプロダクト?

EN

that 25 million was from A16 and Ribbit.

アームストロング#132

そう。政策で立法を通すのも嫌じゃない。

EN

The series A was from uh Union Square Ventures and Ribbit."

センラ#133

嫌じゃないの? 前にも言っていて、衝撃だった。

EN

Okay.

アームストロング#134

以前はDCに行って政治家に会うのが消耗だと感じた時期もある。今は妙に嫌じゃない。DCには大きな個性の面白い人が多い。

学んだのは、会社のミッションを前に進めるものなら、何でも興奮できる、ということだ。実際やっていることは楽しくないこともある。履歴書300枚のレビュー、適切な財務リーダーがいない時期の会計士だらけの会議——大学で会計を取ったが会計士ではない。でも今ラウンドを閉じるために財務諸表を整えるなら、価値を生む。動機をそこから引き出す。多くは会社でいちばん厄介な問題——二つのチームが激怒し両リーダーが辞めると言う、事業を閉じてレイオフする——朝やりたくない最悪の仕事だ。マゾではない。消耗することも多い。でもボールを前に進めた、今日は役に立った、という充足がある。

EN

Yeah. And then A6Z was the B series.

センラ#135

会社のボトルネックを探している、という感じがいい。

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#136

イーロンが言う、その時点の制約要因(limiting factor)に深く潜る、は素晴らしい原則だ。もう一つは、意思決定を組織の下に押し下げること。難しいが、明確なDRIを置き、実行のペースを上げる。大きくなるとステークホルダーが増えて難しいが、単一の意思決定者、短い時間枠、決断してブロックを外す。僕はペースカーであり、必要なときにリスク許容を提供する。

「これを試したい。狂っているが、うまくいけば20倍で成功確率20%」——取るべきベットだ。多くの会社はリスク回避でやらない。「やれ。失敗したら僕の責任」とエアカバーを出す。意思決定のやり方の一部だ。

EN

So, who was doing the graph then? Was it Union Square and Ribbit?

センラ#137

創業者としての人格が映っている会社の要素は?

EN

That was that was Yeah. Union Square Ventures and

アームストロング#138

プロダクトグループが4〜5あること。新しいものを作りたい、ほとんど過剰なほど。リソース配分は厳格にして薄く広げすぎないようにしている。でも新しいカテゴリへの野心は続く。AIの時代、それがより価値になるかもしれない。

EN

Was it Mickey?

センラ#139

頭からアイデアが溢れると、時間・資源・人が制約だった。今はオンデマンドの知的同僚がいる。

EN

Yeah. [laughter]

アームストロング#140

本当に、V1を動かすコストは大幅に下がった。社内でも見ている。やり切るのは依然として激しい仕事だが、リソース配分では、2〜3人チームで試し、マイルストーンを打ったら内部シリーズA、のようにしている。少しベンチャーキャピタルのように扱う。

EN

You know him? Okay.

センラ#141

社内でその言葉を使う?

EN

Yeah. Yeah. I spent a time with them. I like him a lot.

アームストロング#142

使う。年二回、誰でもピッチできる。Next bets。多くの会社では上司、その上司……CEOまで五つ連続でYesが要り、一人でもNoなら終わり——委員会でリスク回避になる。うちでは各プロダクトグループのリーダーが予算を持ち、僕、CFO、エミリー、才能ある若手エンジニアなどもいる。誰か一人がYesして自分の予算から出せばグリーンライト。10人のVCにピッチする感じだ。誰か一人のYesで足りる。

面白いことに、僕がNoを投じたのに大成功したものがある。USDC(ステーブルコイン)だ。恥ずかしいがNoだった。幸い他の人が予算から出し、2025年だけでだいたい8億ドルの売上になったと思う。良いアイデアはどこからでも来る。ウォズニアックがHPにパーソナルコンピュータを提案してNoと言われ、辞めてAppleを作った——そういう話は多い。

EN

That's great. Yep.

センラ#143

サム・ウォルトンもウォルマートのアイデアをあげようとしてNoと言われた。

EN

That sounds like something he would do. Yeah. Well, he was a Bitcoin believer for a long time before.

アームストロング#144

だから常に少し恐れている。中に優秀な若手エンジニアがいる。ピッチでき、僕でなくても誰かが資金を出せるようにしたい。

EN

Why? Because he came he spent the first 36 or 37 years of his life living in South America.

センラ#145

マーケティングにはどれくらい時間を? ユニークなことをしている。

EN

Yep. Venezuela.

アームストロング#146

気づいてくれてありがとう。クレジットはほぼチームだ。見せてもらい、狂ったことを試すエアカバーを出す。「最高、走れ」。多くの組織は慎重すぎる。スーパーボウルのQRコード、カラオケなど、野心的なアイデアを試している。今のマーケティングの多くはTVのブランド広告よりネット上のコンテンツだ。

単純な例だが、上場企業の決算説明は退屈で、アナリストが古い会議システムで聴く。僕はいつも退屈で、「もっと面白くできないか」と言った。ファイナンスの一部は「スクリプトどおり。数字を報告するだけ」と。僕は「違う。マーケティングの瞬間だ。ストーリーを売れ」と。最近の決算では、プライベート時代にピッチしていたようなデッキを作り、僕が語る動画をサイトに載せ、マーケティングが縦型に編集した——ゲームでコインを集める映像を横に載せるやつ。短尺では話だけより、ゲームや迷路があるとリテンションが跳ねる。

EN

Yeah. Exactly.

センラ#147

見た。

EN

The people who had seen hyperinflation countries kind of got it right away. The people who had only spent time in the United States were like, why would anyone use a new a new kind of money, you know?

アームストロング#148

インターネットネイティブな若いマーケターだ。コカ・コーラの広告を作ってきた人ではなく、ネットとミーム文化で生きてきた人。「ミーム株にしたいのか」と言う人もいるが、違う。長く立つ重要な機関を作っている。でも今日人がコンテンツを消費するやり方で知らせる必要がある。株主レターはフィデリティなどの大きなファンドから良いフィードバックをもらう。出すのは良い。でも99%の人は株主レターを読まない。ソーシャルのクリップで会社を知る。インターネットネイティブにどう話すか。

EN

So, from your perspective as a founder, you thought your product at that point was a wallet and an exchange to buy Bitcoin.

センラ#149

すべてがマーケティングだ。

EN

Yeah. And how long did you did you think that was going to be like the the totality of the business? Were you already thinking about product extension back then or no? First I I knew there was a lot of ways to die along the way. So I was just trying to get the simple thing working. I mean we had hackers trying to break into our systems. We had like engineers quitting because it was like just overwhelming and there was too much stuff. We had they were getting paged in the middle of the night like three times every night trying to keep the website up. um there you know these banks might just turn us off and we go out. So there was all kinds of just I was just trying to survive like the next few months often you know in the back of my mind I I knew that if we could get this thing to scale just on the first product there's all kinds of things that this could disrupt. I mean that that's what I got excited about when I first read the Bitcoin white paper was like this could be a new kind of financial system for the world um that's global and fair and decentralized more free market oriented anybody with a with a cell phone could have access to good financial services participate in a global economy like the government couldn't erode all their wealth via inflation like what happened in Argentina so I I knew that there was high potential for this eventually but like there wasn't too much time to think about that we were just there was a lot of sleep deprivation and long hours and just trying to survive to the next 3 months.

アームストロング#150

コンテンツ。すべてが。

EN

And how long did this that period last? Is this a couple years?

センラ#151

「どうせコールはやらなきゃいけない。なら面白くしろ」がいい。注意を集めないとミッションにも効かない。デヴィッド・オルグルビーの名言がある——空の教会では魂を救えない。ドアの中に入れないと。

EN

Yeah. I mean, I'd say like like four like four or five years in I I got to we were at a place where I felt like I could take um you know I could take a week off and not the place wouldn't blow up or something.

アームストロング#152

よく言った。

EN

Who's influencing your thinking in terms of like the kind of company that you want to build and the way you want to build it back then? There was a book called PayPal Wars which talked about the early days of PayPal and it's actually pretty remarkable. You go back and look at what you know Peter Teal and Elon Max Lebchin all these guys were doing David Sachs they actually had many similar ideas to Bitcoin. They were they were trying to create a decentralized form of money that could be permissionless global on the internet. It you know because of the history of the company and how it got acquired by eBay and a lot of the people left it it ended up being more just like a checkout alternative with credit cards and stuff. But actually having worked at Airbnb, it that that g that actually gave me a good picture into what was possible as well because in college, you know, I went to school at Rice University in Houston. Amazing school. I loved it. And but it didn't really have like a startup environment. It wasn't like Stanford or something. And so I had never really seen a successful startup from the inside. I had tried doing my own startup which didn't go super well. And inside Airbnb, it was like it was like some magic was happening. Like they'd caught lightning in a bottle and thing was growing like wildfire. They were the way that they hired people and had this really high bar for excellence and design. The way they did decision-m like a lot of things I got to see working there. And then I and then I kind of said, okay, um I before in my mind I had it kind of put on a pedestal. I was like, wow, these are like some crazy geniuses that are doing all this kind of stuff. And there's something amazing about working with getting in the room just so you can see how people work. And it it doesn't mean that they're not geniuses. I think those guys are brilliant. It means like I got to see it and it demystified it and it made it feel possible that I could try to do something a little bit similar, right? And so there's a couple companies like that. I mean now nowadays I would say you know certainly like the level of ambition like that Elon has these things are very inspiring. I've tried to take bits and like parts from Google, Amazon. Um, I've I've sort of been a student of lots of these companies and tried to take the best. Anything from history?

センラ#153

株主レターはどう書く? バフェットのレターを読み直している。最高のマーケティングで、キャロル・ルーミスと7ヶ月やり取りした年もある。技術的には上場企業の話なのに、ビジネスの教えになっている。

EN

Yeah. I mean, I really like the Wright brothers. They're they're cool. Um, you you have you ever done an episode on?

アームストロング#154

ベゾスも名作がある。バフェットは70年、ベゾスは21年くらいで、最後は「差別化は生存」のように格言に蒸留した。テック企業の株主レターとして最高級だと思う。あの二人はクラフトのレベルが違う。時代の産物でもある。消費のされ方は変わった。僕らの株主レターは主に数字の報告で、アナリスト向けだ。バフェットやベゾスはビジネスを教える、哲学をチューニングフォークのように出し、変な戦略に合う株主が反応する、という感じだったかもしれない。

EN

Yeah. Episode 228.

センラ#155

君も同じことができるのでは。

EN

You remember that? Wow. Okay.

アームストロング#156

考えたことがなかった。哲学をもっと入れられる。僕にとっては、デッキを語りながら考えるほうが楽な面がある。書くことに強制して蒸留するのも明晰化になる。デッキを読むのではなく、ミッション、何を作っているか——暗号でより良い金融サービス——進捗の測り方、主要指標、信頼されるブランドとしての成長理論、よくある異議へのスライド、提出質問への即興。そのフォーマットを試している。バフェット/ベゾス比喩は深く、非典型だった。

EN

The book by David McCulla.

センラ#157

バフェットの株主レターは史上最も成功したコンテンツマーケティングだと主張できる。評判、その結果の独自ディールフロー。

株主レターを読まないなら、公開企業の情報を人はどう消費している?

EN

Yeah. I think that's the one I read, too.

アームストロング#158

アナリストは読む。完全にゼロではない。でもリテールや細かく追っていない人は、君のポッドキャストのようなもの、X、ブログ、Substack。伝統メディアはまだいるが、65歳未満では減っている。すべての会社がメディア企業だ。自分のブログとソーシャルへ直接。自社ポッドキャストもある。伝統的ジャーナリストを通して出すのは好きじゃない——彼ら自身のバイアスとフィルターがかかる。

EN

Incredible. Yeah. I love these kind of just like big problems like that that humanity you you know you know that it's kind of crazy but it's possible and someone's going to do it maybe in the next hundred years and there's a few there's a few things like that like um longevity we can talk about that like in the biotech space you know fusion energy um

センラ#159

最近それを言う創業者が何人もいる。なぜその結論に?

EN

the right brothers AI

アームストロング#160

ミッション・ファーストのブログのあと、伝統メディアが非常に否定的で事実誤認の記事を書いたことが形成体験になった。伝統的な意味のジャーナリズム——事実を報じ、暴くべきものを調べる——ではなく、政治的プロパガンダ機械に近い。ナラティブに合わなければ偽や誤解を招く話を出す。イエロー・ジャーナリズムやジョセフ・ピューリツァーまで遡る長い歴史だ。

EN

the Wright brothers is crazy because that was like a centuries old problem

センラ#161

僕はニュースをほぼ読まず、古い本と創業者とLLMだけだ、と言うと「情報がない」と言われる。ウィリアム・ランドルフ・ハーストの最初の伝記を読んだか、と聞く。イエロー・ジャーナリズムを発明した側だ。今起きていることの多くはそこから来ている。ハーストの言葉——「君が写真を用意しろ。戦争は僕が用意する」みたいなもの。

EN

like humans have been trying to figure out how to fly for centuries before these two brothers in Dayton, Ohio, if I remember correctly, that essentially saw a century old centuries old problem with the modest profits of a bicycle shop. Yeah.

アームストロング#162

多くの人が気づき、伝統メディアへの信頼は過去最低級だ。ソーシャルにも誤情報の課題はあるが、少なくとも直接言いたいことを出せる。ニューメディアと話すのも良い。解放的でもあった。人生で一度はニューヨーク・タイムズに叩かれろ、と言いたい。怖さが消え、正しいと思うことをやる——見た目やオプティクスの最適化ではなく——に移れる。一度やられて何も起きないと分かる。

EN

And what was fascinating about them is like most of their I mean they had a ton of competitors that had more credentials, more financial backing, and I think in David Mcola's book, if I remember correctly, like they solved humanpowered flight with like $1,500.

センラ#163

いつ通った?

EN

Yeah, it was some really tiny amount of money. And there was people funded with like 200x as much money. But yeah, I mean I I get very passionate about like going after what are the big ideas like that that people could go after and um I think it's actually worth everybody writing some of those down periodically and then see which one grabs you and you think you have something unique to contribute and just like go for it. That those are the the big exciting ideas. So going back to where we were in the story, you're like, okay, I just need to not die.

アームストロング#164

Coinbase成長中に小さな形で何度も。記事が間違っていて訂正しない。ジャーナリストから「4時間後に出す。コメントは?」——完全に偽情報なのに。会社への厄介な税金のようだった。本当にラディカル化したのはミッション・ファースト後だ。複数の組織、特にNYTは、後から内部の人に聞いた話では、チームを組んで「この会社のDirtを掘れ、否定的記事を書け」と。何も見つける前に見出しがあった。人種差別や特定マイノリティへの低賃金をほのめかす記事——偽だった。誠実な対話ではなく、自分でも気づかないバイアスと政治的アジェンダ。ジャーナリズムというより政治的プロパガンダ企業。それが直接発信へシフトさせた。

EN

I have something working and is if I just don't die, I can figure out other products or, you know, a way to grow the business in the future. Were you thinking of any other like any other specific way about like I want to build a a company this way?

センラ#165

ユニークなのは、会社を作りながら業界の始まりにいることだ。今日考えていた比喩は、初期のアメリカ自動車創業者——車会社の作り方を学びつつ、産業も同時に作る。今ソフトウェア会社を始めても、ソフトウェア産業そのものはもうある。

EN

Well, there was a few things I was thinking about. I mean, one was articulating a mission, right, that could be bigger. Um, writing down the values of the company, which we can talk about. Actually, we didn't do this maybe till we were a couple hundred people because or this all happened organically in the beginning. It was just who we were hiring and the the culture sort of formed organically, but after we got a little bigger, we started to think about, right, let's formalize it. I wasn't going to be able to be in every single interview indefinitely, right? So, okay, the values, the mission.

アームストロング#166

いい点だ。ヘンリー・フォードの頃、馬が怖がるから、都市で車の前を旗を持って走れ、という法律があった、とマーク・アンドリーセンが言っていた。暗号はまったく新しい産業で、金融サービス全体を更新する。ガンジーの言葉——最初は無視し、笑い、戦い、ダボスで指を振られ——そして勝つ。いま第3段階で、まだ戦いはあるが、世界の大手銀行の多くが暗号統合で動いていて、LinkedInでは暗号のPMやエンジニアを採用している。うまくいっている。政策のレーダー上の小さな交渉だ。

ピーター・ティールは、起業家は逆張りだが正しい必要がある、と言う。長く馬鹿に見えても平気でいる必要がある。銀行に「暗号企業です、やりたい」と電話して切られ、30人目のVCにNoされ、千人目の採用候補……長く誤解され続け、ゆっくり突破口が出る。Uber、Airbnb、自動運転——真に革新的なものは既存の利益を怒り、政府と交差し、現状に疑問を持つこと自体に怒る層を作る。ライト兄弟も、飛行を作ったのに何年も信じられず、米国政府に持っていったら祝われるどころか、ヨーロッパへ行った。

EN

When did you arrive at the mission?

センラ#167

陸軍省の有名な言葉——「飛行機に軍事的用途は見出せない」。40年後に世界大戦を決めた。最初に軍事購入したのはフランス政府だったはずだ。

EN

I don't remember the exact year, but it was at least a few a few years in. We started to really think about it. And, you know, for me, it was not just like getting people to use crypto or something. I was like, what's why do why why do we want that? And it was because it was it was enabling everybody to own their own wealth in a way that couldn't be taken from them. Go try to attempt more ambitious things in in in life. It was kind of like a foundation like basic property rights is what they'd call it in economics, right? Um and if you had sound money, basic property rights, low friction to try new things in the world that might benefit people and actually be able to keep the upside of it, you'd have more people trying attempting this. that very much appealed to me. We sort of take this for granted in the United States that you know usually like the money is just not going to get taken out of your bank account or something like that. But in many places of the world that's not true, right? Um there's people like where the government will actually do seizures. Um the Cypress actually did this recently in the past where they like took bunch of money out of everyone's bank accounts to like cover debt. There's refugees that have to flee borders in various times in history where the all their wealth gets confiscated. There is so much bureaucracy and corruption in places like Argentina to even start a company. Um it's like it's a huge black market and there's just Yeah. So and and by the way people in can't they can't get access to loans or anything like that. Like you know one one of the major ways people build wealth in the United States is you buy a home you get a mortgage. Only wealthy people can really buy real estate in Argentina because you can't get a mortgage. you have to pay cash. So there's all kinds of ways that this is just pernicious and it it it like decelerates progress essentially. So I was trying to think of a piffy way to articulate that and I wrote down you know this increase economic freedom in the world mission and um you know it's a little wonky sometimes people uh don't know what exactly it means and they have to go read about it but um it does encompass what we're trying to do and I think crypto is the best technology to increase economic freedom. How were you recruiting talent back then? And were you sitting in on every single interview?

アームストロング#168

イノベーションの本質は、誤解される覚悟と、同時に正しいこと。間違った狂ったアイデアを投げるだけじゃだめだ。

EN

Yeah. So, I mean the very early days um it was just like me cold like going to meetups and try and trying to get anybody interested and come and interview. It was like cold messaging people off LinkedIn. Um it was reaching out to people who I had worked with in various context.

センラ#169

ライト兄弟は産業と会社を作ったが、産業で最も成功した会社にはならなかった。君はそうなっていない。

EN

Why did it have to be outbound at that point?

アームストロング#170

比喩をいじりすぎないが、ウィルバーとオービルは発明家寄だ。こちらの等価はサトシ・ナカモトのような人。すごい。自分は科学者というよりエンジニア/起業家だ。ビットコインの発明そのものではなく、起きていることを早く認識し、機会を商業化して成功企業を作る。エジソンのようなフロンティアの科学的突破への敬意は大きい。自分はその人ではないと思う。鼻が利いて、面白いことが起きていて機会があり、会社で商業化する、という側だ。

EN

Well, first of all, crypto was like a very niche thing. Like we were not a hot company at Y Cominator. We went to the demo day that they do where we raised like the six raised the 600k seed round and um but there was lots of companies that raised like multi-million dollar rounds and beyond. Like we were kind of middle of the pack somewhere, maybe a little below in terms of how hot the company was. So the only people we managed to actually convince to invest or to join the company were people who had already gotten excited about crypto for some reason. And then they met us and they're like, "Okay, this is semi-legit at least." like they've gone through Y cominator, they have this product that's working, they've have some early investors like Union Square Ventures. And so we got some of these like the first five or 10 people who joined were like cryptozelots who just thought might we might be a good company to bet on. As the company got bigger, you know, we we hired recruiting teams and the whole the whole thing. We were competing with big tech in San Francisco, which was, you know, during the zero interest rate phenomenon, it was like fiercely competitive. Um we eventually um brought opened other offices, hired some remote workers. Hiring is it own a whole topic.

センラ#171

エジソンは商業化に執着していた。「売れないものは発明したくない。販売が有用性の証明」という名言がある。

Coinbaseにミッションがありつつ、複数のことをやりたがる自然な傾向がある、と言っていた。別の会社を始めた。

EN

Yeah. Well, I'm curious like have you found any other um I talked to my friend Kareem, founder of Ramp about this. Daniel, founder of Spotify. They both think about it in the same exact way where they hire for spikes.

アームストロング#172

個人のミッションは、世界の文明の進歩を加速することだ。経済的自由はその基盤で、暗号がその道。Coinbase上場で流動性ができ、ソフトウェア以外のハードテックで、もっと資本が要る大きな問題で助けられるものは何か、と考えた。AIと暗号がいま二大、あとは核融合、BMI、宇宙……。いいチームがすでにいて、自分の独自性が薄いものもあった。もう一つ大きいと思ったのが寿命(ロンジェビティ)——生物学を再プログラムし、人間であることの意味を拡張する。

信じられるチームが見えなかった。ロンジェビティ領域はスネークオイルや怪しい人物も多かった——何世紀も、そして暗号にも少し似ている。バイオテックCEOやPhDの友人に声をかけ、ディナーを開いた。部屋にトップを集め、地平線上で資金不足のいちばん面白いものは何か、と聞く。学ぶ良い方法だ。友人のブレイク・バイヤーズと共同創業し、話題の一つがエピジェネティック・リプログラミング——細胞を再プログラムし、若かったときの機能を戻す。山中伸弥の皮膚細胞から幹細胞への再プログラムなどが先駆的突破だ。ビットコインのホワイトペーパーを読んだときのような感覚がした。このうさぎ穴はどこまで深い? 細胞は思ったより可塑性がある。

ディナーを通じてジェイコブ・キンメル、グレッグ・ジョンソンらとNew Limitを作った。細胞を若返り機能に戻す新規療法を探すロンジェビティ企業だ。3〜4年で、ヒト細胞の再プログラムで機能回復を実証。数万、やがて数百万の仮説をハイスループットで試し、AIで優先順位を付ける発見プラットフォーム。最初の候補はおそらく来年臨床試験。思ったより速い。自分の金を1億ドルコミットして立ち上げ、その後他からも調達。5〜6年は純粋研究かと思っていたが、科学の進歩が早く、臨床試験に入れる。今後5年で3〜5候補、と期待している。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#173

これからも会社を作り続ける?

EN

One of the benefits of being a founder company is, you know, big companies try to manage to the middle. They don't want the high highs or the low lows. and uh Daniel K are both like, "No, I want the best the person that is the best in the world at this one tiny little thing and that's all I want them to do and I'll deal with their usually, you know, excessive uh or extreme personality traits on the other side of that."

アームストロング#174

すると思う。Coinbase内のプロダクトグループも含め、世界に良いインパクトを出す会社を作るのがいちばん楽しい。何十年かけて少し上手くなり、痛い教訓も積む。散漫になりすぎたくはない。それぞれ本当に難しい。でも来る数十年で、もっと始めたい。

EN

Yeah, I totally agree with that. I mean, that that's like we were looking at people's past work

センラ#175

Coinbaseが、君がCEOである最後の会社になる?

EN

and not necessarily like their resume or um you know, if they just if they showed up in the interview and it was like, "Wow, I learned something. I left the interview with more energy than I went in. They're like a very efficient communicator. Um, and then they can point to things that they've done which are like real outliers of success. We're like, "Oh, that's awesome." Or they maybe we've seen their work previously. These are people who we would hire. I mean, there's many examples of this like, you know, you talk about some of their personality quirks and like biology of Austin is like this genius guy who was our CTO for a while and he he like did so many amazing things and he's like very eccentric. Um, actually the very first hire at Coinbase was this guy Olaf Carlson Wei outside of Fred and I as the co-founders and we were trying to hire this customer someone to come in to run customer support because of the backlog I mentioned. And I remember it came down there was two finalists. One of them was this guy who had run a team at Google AdSense and on paper he was like this guy worked at Google. He's like he'd run a big team of like 20 or 30 people. I was like very credentialed, but you just in the interview it was just like it was kind of low energy and like not exciting for some reason even though on paper he was like super qualified and Olaf came in and his prior job was he he was a lumberjack lit literally he had just graduated college. He had written his he wrote his thesis in college on Bitcoin and then he did this kind of like walkabout sort of spirit quest thing where he went for like a summer and was like he was a lumberjack. So he came in and he looked like super disheveled and you know he he like threw on some like ill-fitting suit he'd bought like on the way to the interview or because he only owned like lumberjack clothing. Um but the guy was just like super bright, super passionate, super young, sup super hungry and we're like screw it. Like let's just give this guy a shot. Like it's it's it's going to be it was just exciting to like talk to him about crypto. And he crushed it. So he by the way he he went on and founded like a he's like a billionaire. he's created like a crypto uh venture fund. So [laughter] like these were the kinds of bets that we wanted to make. They were people who were entrepreneurial. We've had a lot of good success with that. I know Toby talked about that recently on on the podcast too. Um and they were people that were just like high agency smart get done. Um and they even if they were totally unqualified on paper and those were some of our best hires.

アームストロング#176

難しい質問だ。

EN

So I was reading a ton of the um Bitcoin subreddit back then. Yeah. around this time and am I wrong? Weren't you getting like a lot of because you know everybody's like this is decentralized and you're like well no I'm like actually trying to build like a real business here like

センラ#177

聞いた理由は、トビに驚いたからだ。AIの進歩がなければ、もうShopifyのCEOではないかもしれない、と。

EN

did you have an issue getting talented people to work for you like because you were kind of this is you might be autistic you might be right because now [laughter] you're you're interested in this like weird Bitcoin thing way before other people are and then not only that you're like bucking the trend in this weird subculture too. [laughter] Yeah. I mean, so, um, people did often ask that. They're like, well, isn't the whole point of Bitcoin to be decentralized? And I was like, yeah, it uses a decentralized protocol. We just want to make it easy for people to access it. So, you can choose to use our company, but there you could use any company like as opposed to, let's say, Visa. Like, the only way to access the Visa network is through one company, Visa, you know, but like email is a better analogy. Email is a decentralized protocol, but you can use Gmail or Outlook or whatever. So, at least there's like choice. But even going beyond that, um, because for years we heard that as a criticism. So we said, "All right, let's make a self-custodial wallet, too." Like if you want to custody your own crypto and not have to trust us at all, we're going to put out a wallet for that. And so we have a successful product now, too, on our self-custodial wallet. I think both are important. Um, the centralized product gives people a lot of ease of use. Like if you forget your password, your money's not gone, that kind of stuff. And it also allowed a lot of institutions like most of the money in the world is that like something like 80 or 90% of it's all tied up in in financial institutions. It's not retail people. And so when we went and met met with institutions and were like self-custodial wallets, they they're like that that sounds super scary. We're not going to do that. So they wanted these kind of enterprisegrade custody solutions. Um and we we've had we've been very successful building those kind of things for like banks. That decision was based on the response of the market or is that a decision you made before and then brought that decision to the market. The one around in institution specifically was based on conversations with them. Yeah. And the the retail customer though I would say that was made prior to customer that was like my intuition. So we've got to make this simple simple and easy to use and trusted and um the average person is not going to know how to run like a self-custodial wallet on their laptop. Um the tech has gotten better and better where like account recovery and these things are now possible but at the time it was very scary like if you lost many people had this happen sadly like if they lost their password or something trying to custody their own bitcoin it was it was gone. There's many many many sal stories about that. Yeah, it's funny because there's like a parallel here when um Steve Jobs had that observation. He's like, well, the first things we're making at Apple, they're for hobbyists, but he's like the he's like if the amount of people that want to like put together their own computer, it's like if as opposed to the ones that want to go to the store, like if you just treat it, he call it like the appliance. He's like wanting to make a personal computers like appliance. It's like that market is a thousand times bigger. I wanted it being millions of times bigger actually. But his idea was like the easier I make it, the bigger the market gets. I think that's that's right. And it's fine. Like a lot of these products start off with hobbyists who love the tech for the tech's sake and they want to take it apart, but ultimately what crypto is going to do is just going to update the financial system so people have better financial services. Many people are going to use it without even knowing they're using crypto. They're just going to say, I don't know, I just want to send money to my family abroad or whatever. And instead of paying 11% at Western Union, I just want it to arrive instantly for free or whatever. And like they're going to use stable coins for that, right? or if they want to get um a loan and it's just using DeFi, it's like cheaper, lower rate and they can get approved in 30 seconds. It's like that's easier than calling a bank and filling out all these forms, right? So, Coinbase's app actually has evolved. I mean, fast forwarding to modern day like we are now um you can trade any type of asset, not just crypto assets. You can trade stocks and commodities and prediction markets and then you can get a loan. You we have a Coinbase card. You can spend we're just trying to build better financial services now. And actually like that's where you started to get into like multi- trillion dollar market.

アームストロング#178

それも聞いて驚いた。僕は同じようには感じない。AIは働き方と金融サービスを全部変える——それは次に話そう。CoinbaseのCEOは長く続けたい。

EN

Yeah. You call it the what? The everything app.

センラ#179

CEOは好き?

EN

The everything exchange. Yeah.

アームストロング#180

とても充足する、と明言する。とてもストレス、超楽しい、尻を蹴られるような酷い日——全部ある。会社の誰もが上げてくる最も難しいことがエスカレートしてくる。それが充足を生む。ビデオゲームの難しいレベルのように、少しコンフォートゾーンの外で、能力の限界でクリアした感覚が要る。

EN

Everything exchange.

センラ#181

仕事で極度にストレスなとき、どう解く? 距離を取る?

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#182

すごく大事なテーマだ。YC同期の創業者の多くが3〜4年で燃え尽きた。体重増減、髪が塊で抜けた人、処方薬依存……。両端で何年も蝋燭を燃やせるが、いつか燃え尽きる。何十年インパクトを出すには持続可能にしないと。僕はだいたい数年ごとにバーンアウトの局面が来て、何かを変える——もっと委任、直接報告を減らす、など。ルーチンは睡眠、運動、栄養、そして瞑想や祈りと呼べるもの——夜のサウナ、朝1分の瞑想。仕事モードでは厳格。週末は緩める。毎日同じ服。十分寝て、重いものを上げ、ゾーン2有酸素、数分瞑想、それから仕掛ける。

EN

And a super app. Maybe that's Yeah. You combine the two.

センラ#183

夜のウィンドダウンは?

EN

Okay. This is not like a plan from the beginning. Like Bezos had the everything store. That was the code name of Amazon in Dehaw like in the hedge fund that spun out. So he kind of had that master plan at the beginning even though he started with books.

アームストロング#184

主なのは画面を見ないこと。仕事のノートや電話を一瞬見るだけで怒れ、そのまま寝ると仕事のストレス夢で休まらない。寝る前に切り替えの時間が要る。

EN

But that was not the case with

センラ#185

どのくらい?

EN

uh Coinbase. Correct. I felt like more and more of the economy was going to run on Bitcoin because it was just faster, cheaper, more global. I didn't I couldn't have foreseen all of the things that happened. I didn't foresee stable coins. I didn't foresee prediction markets. Like I I just knew that we had a foothold with something everybody really like Bitcoin turned out to be the best performing asset class of the last decade. And so a lot of people wanted to buy it and hold it. We were the easiest way to do that. That was a a wedge into the market to start to then update all kinds of financial services. And that's how I didn't have a complete picture of that from day one. That I think that would be intellectually dishonest for me to say that I knew exactly how that was going to play out, but I had a I knew that the potential of it went way beyond just like buying Bitcoin or something. I I was like, this could power the global economy because it's just better than like having certain countries printing their own money or like super high fees in each country. like we need a we need a native financial layer to the internet that's truly global and decentralized and like a bigger and bigger share of GDP could run on that over time. I I knew it was massive. I just didn't know exactly how it would play out. Hey, real quick. I've started a newsletter for this podcast that you might find interesting. The newsletter shares five of my favorite quotes from each episode along with behindthe-scenes photos with the guest. The first of these newsletters goes out next week. I'll share my five favorite quotes from the Daniel E episode along with some of the photos with Daniel and I. To sign up, just go to davidcenter.com/newsletter. That's davidcenter.com/newsletter. So, how do you think about running the company now? How is it organized? Well, there's lots of ways you can answer that question. So, I have a really amazing president and COO, Emily Choy. She uh really is an amazing operator. Allows me to focus on a lot of the the managing the product group. Like, I'd say I'm pretty product focused CEO. She's operationally focused. And it's an amazing combo of skill sets. I actually think a lot of enterprise value can get generated when you pair um like a technical founder with a great operator, right? Because if you have just an operator, they can um make the company very very efficient. You know, this sort stereotypically everyone's different, right? But if you imagine like a like only an operational leader, the company will run very efficiently, but they won't they'll miss their next wave of innovation or something, right? And if you have only a founder, sometimes they blow the place up because they like every they're always trying to do some crazy new thing, right? And so I think there's a really healthy balance of those two things. And you there are other companies where like traditionally like Zuckerberg and Cheryl or Samberg or you know whatever kind of classic thing you want to look at. I'd say even at Google there probably Eric Schmidt and um Larry kind of played that role right and with Sergey. So there's examples like that in history. I think um anyway it's generated a lot of value for Coinbase to have Emily and I both there

アームストロング#186

だいたい1時間。本、何か見る、サウナなど。

EN

and you get the most energy when you're working on product.

センラ#187

AIの話の前に——Coinbaseと他社の時間配分は?

EN

Yeah. And I and I don't mind going and doing some policy, you know, try to get legislation passed.

アームストロング#188

Coinbaseがフルタイムで99%。New Limit立ち上げ時は5〜10%使っていた。必要なときは入るが、主に投資家・ボードで、オペレーションや資金調達を手伝う。日々はジェイコブ・キンメルがプレジデントとして回していて、科学者としてもビジネスとしてもすごい。

EN

You don't mind it?

センラ#189

パーマー・ラッキーも、会社は複数でも時間は99%が一つ、毎朝その会社への最高レバレッジを考える、と言っていた。やりたくないことでも。

EN

Yeah. I there was times where I felt like um man, it's like draining to like go to go to DC and I have to go meet with all these politicians. I actually don't mind it now in a weird way. It's there's so many interesting people in DC. There's like big big personalities and

アームストロング#190

まさにそれだ。短期の楽なことに流されやすい。大抵、いちばん大事でいちばん嫌なことから一日を始める。

EN

Okay, [laughter] hold on. We got we got to we got to go into that cuz you said that earlier and I was like I got to ask him about this that is shocking to me.

センラ#191

AIはCoinbaseの働き方をどう変えている?

EN

Yeah.

アームストロング#192

多い。他社と似た部分と、違う部分がある。似た部分は、コードの50%超がエージェントに書かれ、カスタマーサポートの約60%がエージェント回答。ベンダーも社内カスタムモデルも使う。コンプライアンス自動化は社内で多く作る。デザインは急速にプロトタイプできる。ファイナンスのFP&Aやモデルも。意思決定にも。鍵はデータの取り込み——Google Docs、Slack、GitHub、Salesforce。CEOとして何に気づくべきか、と聞くと「このチームは戦略で揃っていない」と出る。知らなかった、となる。社内チームが作り、LibreChatのようなオープンソースやGlean、Slackbot、Geminiなど複数を試し、社員がどれに寄るかを見ている。多くのテック企業のベストプラクティスで、暗号固有ではない。

暗号により固有なのは、AIエージェントが仕事のために支払いを必要とし始め、ステーブルコインのウォレットを渡していることだ。人間ならクレジットカードを持てるが、エージェントは毎回人間の承認を求めるか、夜から数時間・1週間「これをやれ」と任せるなら、AWSを立てる、ペイウォールの論文を読む、ドメインを買う、マーケを回す——デジタル従業員のように扱うならコーポレートカード的なものが要る。伝統的カードは非人間に出せない。だからステーブルコインウォレット。マシン間決済。ここ数ヶ月で新しいがトラクションがある。どのエージェントにもステーブルコインウォレットを入れられるツールも作った。

EN

That you find them interesting. Well, here's one thing I learned about my mo my motivation is that I can get excited about anything that helps advance the mission of the company forward, right? Like there's times where if you look at what I'm actually doing, it's like really not fun. Like grind stuff. It's just like uh like review 300 rums or something or um there was a moment where we like we didn't have the right finance leader and I was like going to all these meetings with accountants and stuff and I was like I took a class in college on accounting but I'm like not an accountant by any stretch of the imagination and you know I was like if this is what is necessary at this moment to get the financial statements to a state where we can close this round or whatever it's generating value in the company. So I try to derive my sense of motivation from that. And a lot of times the thing I'm doing is like actually like the gnarliest problem in the company. It's like oh these two teams are super pissed at each other and both the leaders are threatening to quit and you know or I have to go shut down this whole thing and like we're going to lay people off or whatever. Like usually it's the the worst thing you're trying to cycle you don't want to wake up and do. But I find a sense of um it's not I'm not a massochist about it. Like a lot of times it's draining, but I derive a sense of fulfillment from it of like, okay, this is moving the ball forward. At least I I did something useful today.

センラ#193

個人ではどう使っている?

EN

I like that idea like you're essentially searching for bottlenecks in the company.

アームストロング#194

ClaudeやCodexを少し触って、開発者が使う現在のベストツールを理解している。ローカルで回す。プロダクションに大量のコードは書いていない——書いているCEOもいるが、尊敬する。CEOとしては主にリサーチ——これとこれを理解し、ドラフトして——と、社内データがつながった意思決定。意思決定フレームワークに、AIエージェントが意見を書く行があり、他の人と比較できる。それが主な使い方だ。

EN

Yeah, like that's a great um actually Elon frames what is the limiting factor at any given time and that I go dive deep on that that is a very great principle. I'd say the last thing is just you we try to push down decision-m in the org, right? It's hard. It's hard to do, but that's like make clear DRIs of each of these different things and just try to amp up the pace of execution, right? Of just it's hard to do as the company gets bigger because you have more stakeholders and all this, but it's like, okay, single decision maker, push it down. Um, and just give people short time frames like knock out a decision, unblock this, go go. And I try to be a little bit of like um the pace car for that and provide risk tolerance to the organization when needed. Like let's say somebody comes and says, "Hey, I think we should try this thing." And it's a kind of a crazy idea, but if it worked, it'd be amazing. Like it'd be um like a 20x outcome, but it has like a 20% chance of success, which you should take that bet all day long. But most companies are riskaverse. They won't they won't do something that has a 20% chance of success. And I'm like, "Go for it. if it fails, it's on me, you know, and I try to just give people like air cover for those things. Um, so that's that's a little bit of like the decision- making how we do that.

センラ#195

まだ少し混乱している。Baseアプリを説明して。プレゼンも君の話も見たが、まだ混乱している。

EN

What other elements of the company you think are like a reflection of your personality as a founder? I mean just the fact that we have like you know four or five product groups like that's probably a little bit of the reflection of my like I I always want to build new things almost to a fault and I actually we have a lot of good systems in place to be rigorous about okay let's re resource allocation is very important that you don't want to get too spread too thin but I I keep having like ambition to go build new things in new categories in the age of AI that actually might be like more valuable how what do What do you think? Because if you have all Yeah. If you have all these ideas and like usually you'd be constrained, you know, by time or resources or actual physical people to go and implement all these ideas coming out of your head.

アームストロング#196

シンプルに言うと、BaseアプリはCoinbaseのセルフカストディ版だ。最近新バージョンを出して、率直に言って賛否が分かれた。ソーシャル面で新しいことを試したが、うまくいかず、コミュニティからフィードバックが来た。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#197

タップで買うやつ?

EN

And now you have, you know, on tap on on demand intelligent like co-workers.

アームストロング#198

ダブルタップで投稿を買える、など。各投稿にほぼ時価総額があり、投稿コインと、任意のクリエイターコイン。投稿を買うと経済がクリエイターに流れ、上下して残存価値ゼロ、と思っていたら、多くの投稿に最終的に数千ドルの価値が残り、クリエイターへの感謝と、クリエイターコイン保有、という使われ方をした。長い話を短くすると、ソーシャル/ソーシャルメディアトークンの空間で何かはうまくいくと思うが、トークノミクスはまだ解けていない。将来も良いコンテンツを作り続ける人——今は相対的に未発見で、これから大きくなる——に、会社のようにトークンを持ち、広告収入などから収益が流れる、もっと耐久性のある形が要る。今の実装はそこまでではなかった。実験として試し、十分ではなかった。いまアプリは取引と、Coinbaseアプリのセルフカストディ版にフォーカスを戻した。それでもソーシャルトークン空間の何かはいつかうまくいくと思う。

EN

Yeah, that's true. The cost to get a V1 running is now much much lower and we are seeing that internally. Um now to take some see something through through is still you know intense amounts of work but yeah we we think a lot about resource allocation where you can have like a two or three person team try these ideas internally and then if it only if it starts to work and hits key milestones like then do you do the series A you know internally. So we try to treat it a little bit like venture capital and the hard part

センラ#199

CoinbaseとNew Limit以外で、頭にあるものは?

EN

is this the language you use inside the company.

アームストロング#200

New Limitのほか、科学を加速するResearchHubにも投資し立ち上げを助けた。科学の資金調達と再現性の問題は大きい。ファミリーオフィスでフロンティアの会社にも投資している。進歩を解錠する大きなアイデアも考える。興味がある一つが、米国内外の特別経済区だ。連邦・州・地方の赤テープが厚く、革新が始めにくい。マネー・トランスミッター免許で500万〜1,000万が要る、が例だ。起業家は初期に創意で回すこともあるが、原子力の新プラントはほぼ不可能に近い難しさだ。中国の深圳、香港、UAEのような特別区は世界で大きな価値を解放した例がある。

理想では、米国の連邦の土地を10区画くらい特別区にし、ここは原子炉設計のサンドボックス、ここはバイオの加速試験、ここは暗号、ここはドローン(従来のFAA外で飛ばせる)——急速な革新のあと、連邦免許を取って全米市場へ。新しい技術市場では、始めること自体の参入障壁が高すぎる。特別経済区は面白い。いつか取り組むかもしれない。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#201

革新と起業の参入障壁を下げる、というアイデアが好きだ。ブライアン、最高だった。時間をありがとう。

EN

Really? So, you almost inverted it. Yeah. I always have a little Yeah. So I always have a little bit of that fear in the back of my mind of like there's there's brilliant young engineers inside Coinbase. Um I want to make sure they can come pitch and some somebody even it's not me funds it. Um Yeah, thanks for noticing that. I mean I wish I could take more credit for that. I actually think it's it's the team entirely. Um, you know, they they come and show me the things that they're doing and I I definitely the only thing I'm doing is I'm trying to give them air cover to try crazy stuff and basically whenever they show me something like that's awesome like run with it, you know, and whereas I think most organ some some organizations would be like a little too cautious or hesitant. But yeah, what they're doing with like putting QR codes in the Super Bowl or they just did this karaoke thing at the Super Bowl or I don't know, they they're trying more ambitious ideas which which I like. Um it's also a lot of marketing now is it's actually more like content on the internet than like your track your typical brand ad running on TV. And um you know just like a very simple thing actually was I remember we were putting our earnings calls you know as public company you put out your earnings they're usually kind of dry and boring boring like these analysts tune in listen to these calls you're on like a conference call it was using this like really ancient technology and this ancient vendor that we were using and I remember I was always so bored on these earnings calls I was like I was like like man how do we spice these things up just do something more interesting and I remember some of some of the people on the finance teamwork like Brian just like stay on script it's supposed it's supposed to be boring like just report the numbers like that's all we're doing here and I was like no like this this is a marketing moment we're supposed to be selling some stock like let's go out and tell the story you know of the company and um so anyway just in like this recent earnings we put together like um a pitch deck kind of like we were going and pitching when we were a private company and I was like I want to I want to I want to just like run through the deck and like make a video of me and then um we put it on the website And one of the guys on our marketing team paired it. Have you seen those videos like vertical video where the guy like the guys running through the game collecting coins? Yeah. And so that's like we have these like young internet native marketing people. They're not like you know the people who made ads for Coca-Cola or something. They're just like they're they're just like people who live their whole life on the internet and me like meme meme culture and all this kind of stuff, right? And I mean somebody could reasonably say, "Well, Brian, are you trying to turn the company into a meme stock or something?" And I'm like, "No, not really. I think we're building something very serious and important as like an institution that's going to stand the test of time, but we do need to get the word out in the way that people actually consume content today." And frankly, I I I think our shareholder letter is brilliant. I get a lot of good feedback on it from like the biggest funds at Fidelity and all these kind of folks. So, I'm glad we're putting out a shareholder letter, but 99% of people aren't going to read our shareholder letter. They're going to see some clip on social media about the company and that's kind of how they're ingesting their information. So, how do we speak in an internet native way? And that that Yeah. Content. I mean, everything's It's like you got like you want to save their soul, you got to get their attention first. You got to get them in the door first. How do you compose your shareholder letters? Cuz I'm going through this right now. I just reread Warren Buffett shareholder letters since the last one is out. But that was the best marketing that he ever [clears throat] did. And the amount every year, each year took them about 7 months of him and I think her name is Carol Lumis going back and forth Yeah. So, that's a great point. Actually, Bezos did that, too, right? He's got some bangers. Um Buffett But I think those are probably the best technology company shareholder letters Yeah. I mean I think that um those guys are putting in a level of um craft into those like and you know partly was a product of their time. I think the way people consume this has changed as we talked about. Our shareholder letters are are good. I think they're like really just reporting the numbers primarily right now. So, they're kind of written for analysts whereas I think the Bezos and the and the Buffett one might have been written for more like teaching people about business. Yeah. and searching essentially using that as like almost like a tuning fork to like I'm putting this out and the right shareholders for me in this weird strategy I have will respond to this information. I wonder if you could do the same though. I don't know my philosophy in it. I I think what I want to try is actually going through for me the medium of just talking through a deck and like getting me talking about it can be a little bit easier. There is something powerful about forcing yourself to sit down and really distill it to like in writing which can be clarifying. So that Yeah. Like I don't want to just like read I'm not reading the deck but I want to tell you it'll help me clarify my thinking like okay here's the mission of the company. What are we building? We're just building better financial services with crypto. How do we measure our progress on that? here's our key metrics. You know, it's growing trading volume, market share, and it's and it's like the transaction volume, and the assets on the platform. We have a whole theory about how we're growing that as the most trusted brand. And then, okay, you can also just go through a bunch of objections people commonly would bring up, right? And like, okay, let's have a slide and address that and that and that. Um, and then you can take submitted questions, too, and you can kind of riff on those. I think that that's a good format for us to play with. But um you're bringing I hadn't really thought about the Buffett and the uh Bezos analogy on the shareholders. Those those guys went deep. That was actually that was very atypical. If you think about like what it did for his reputation, the fact that then he got access to proprietary deal flow as a result of that. So if you don't feel people are reading the shareholder letters, how do you think they're consuming information about public companies then? you know how many founders have been telling me that recently? Why do you arrive at that conclusion? you know, one of the like formative experiences I would say as a CEO was that um Because people give me because I don't read the news at all. Like I just read old books and then talk to founders now. Like that's essentially my entire media diet. And then like talking to LLMs. Did you read Joseph? Like who invented yellow journalism? Just read anything that's happening now derived from those two especially in America. Those were the two most influential and powerful, you know, people in media and they literally changed the way that newspapers and the written text came out to make it intentionally more salacious. Yeah. Yeah. What what did he Hurst say? Like you provide the photos, I'll provide the war or something like Yeah. And so anyway, I I think most people have become aware of this now. Like the trust in traditional media is kind of at all-time lows. So, you know, luckily things have moved on. I you know anyway I think it's social media has its own challenges too about misinformation and whatnot but at least like you can just go direct and put out whatever you want to say and people like it or don't it's fine and then um you know I think it's good to talk to new media as well and um anyway that that was a formative experience um and I actually think it was very liberating in a way I actually I think everybody at some point in their life should get the New York Times to write a hit piece on them because you stop fearing it and you start realizing, okay, I'm just going to do whatever I think is the right thing to do now because there's not like some terrible thing that could happen to me anymore. Like it doesn't matter. Like once once they try to once they try to do it and it doesn't do anything, you realize, oh, okay, I'm not trying to optimize for optics here or doing something that looks like that looks good, why don't I actually just do the thing that I think is good regardless of how people perceive it. And that's very liberating. I hope more people experience that. When did you go through that? It happened in many small ways as Coinbase was growing. Like we'd see articles come out that was like, "What? That's not that's not right. What are they talking about?" And they wouldn't post a correction. It was just sometimes you get these calls from journalists that were like, "I'm posting this in 4 hours. Like, will you comment?" They were like, "What? This is totally false information. What are you talking about?" So, it was just this kind of annoying tax that was always happening on the company. But what really I think radicalized me on it was post that Mission First blog post. um like several organizations, but the New York Times in particular, I remember they they basically put a team of people, I was later told by insiders um they're like, "Go just go dig up dirt on this company and um write negative articles about them." They had they had the headline written before they even had found anything. And they wrote articles kind of implying that we were like racist and we were like, you know, underpaying certain minorities and things. False. It was false information. And um you know that that just like this basically was like pissed me off and I was like okay I don't really want to they're not engaging in good faith like these are um they're so biased they don't even realize it and they have some political agenda. It's not really it's not really journalism. It's like a political propaganda company or something. So that was frustrating and yeah it shifted my point of view to go direct. You had a unique experience because you're building a company but you're also starting at the very beginning of an industry. I think like the I was thinking about you earlier today. I was like the analogy is kind of uh that that's sticks in my mind. It's like the early uh American automobile founders. It's like I have to learn how to build a car company but we're building an industry simultaneously or like if you start a software company today like you're not building the software industry. The software has been around. It's a really good point. I mean Henry Ford, you probably know about it, right? It's like when the cars came out and then there people were like freaked out about your cars are going to scare the horses, you know? [laughter] Yeah. So so as not to like scare the horses. and then they confront you at Davos and wave their finger in front [laughter] they had to go to Europe they were doing these demonstrations on like this guy's field in Ohio and almost there'd be like three people watching them Yeah. Didn't wasn't there was that famous famous quote from the war department. They said, "We see new no military application for the airplane [laughter] and 40 years later it won World War." If I remember correctly, I haven't read the book in probably six years. I I should reread it again and do another episode on it, but I think it was like the French government was the first the first person to to actually buy it for the military. for them. So they're they're creating an industry and a company but they actually didn't create the most successful company. In that industry where you did well Wilbur died prematurely I think from like I forgot uh consumption or maybe turerculosis. I forgot what it was. It died like 45. or will live for a lot longer. But there was basically they created the industry and one of the first few companies, but then they were overtaken in a way that you have not been. Yeah. I mean, Edison was obsessed with commercialization though. He said that uh he didn't want to invent anything that didn't sell and that sale is proof of utility. He has a great line on that. So you have your mission on Coinbase, but you said your natural inclination is to work on multiple things, right? Yeah. Yeah, sure. So I I mean, broadly, I I I want to accelerate civilizational progress in the world. That's kind of my personal mission. So I think economic freedom is foundational to that with crypto. When Coinbase went public and you know, I got some liquidity from that. I was also just thinking like okay what are the other big problems in the world like in hard hard tech not just software that might require more capital that I could try to help with and I started thinking you know so the big ones in my mind were like AI and crypto are probably the two biggest right now then of course there's um fusion energy brain machine interfaces space um and all I felt like okay there's good teams working on all of these and I'm not sure what I unique I have to add the other biggest one I thought of was longevity like how do we start to reprogram our own biology to enhance what it means to be human at some point. So, I started hosting these dinners. I I I didn't see teams working on that that I thought were credible. In fact, you know, the longevity space has had like a lot of snake oil type stuff. It's like pretty um you know, attracted some unsavory characters a little bit like crypto Yeah, for centuries Do you think you'll continue to start more companies? Do you think Coinbase is the last company you'll be CEO of? Yeah. Yeah, I was surprised to hear him say that too. I I heard him say that. We haven't talked about that. We need to talk about this. I I want to continue to be co Coinbase CEO for a long time. When you're having these like very stressful times in your life based on work, what do you do to like decompress or to like take time away? What What's your wind down time at night, though? in love making. [laughter] How long is this wind down time? Okay. Before bed. Okay. Yeah. what's the distribution of time between Coinbase and your other company? Yeah. Well, when New Limit was just getting started, I was I was spending um more time with them, like 5 10% of my time, but um and you know, I I jump in whenever needed, but I'm I'm primarily an investor and a board member there. And then I'm helping with some of the operational pieces and helping them raise money and things like that, but sorry I should say scientist and uh business person. Yeah, Even if it's stuff he doesn't want to do which is very uh interesting. Yeah. So, how is AI changing the way that you're working in Coinbase? are you building your own tools or you're using other people's tools? there's a team internally working on this and um there's a couple vend so there's one called Libra chat that's open source you can connect all your internal data to there's other vendors out there um like Glean and Slackbot and different um we're testing three of them or so right now Gemini is doing a bunch of stuff and Google so we're testing all of them to see which ones employees gravitate towards basically that's I would say current best practice amongst a lot of tech companies not super unique to to crypto. The thing that's more unique to crypto is that um these AI agents are increasingly needing to do payments to get work done and we're giving them all stable coin wallets. So you can imagine like in the traditional financial world like you and I can go get a credit card or something where we have to be identified as a human. But if you're an agent trying to get work done, you either have to bug your human every time to like will you approve this purchase or if you want to increasingly these agents you can tell them go do this like overnight or the next two you know the next hours week whatever and get work done like they might need to spin up AWS resources or get through a payw wall on the internet to read some research paper or you know buy a domain name or whatever spin up a marketing program like if you really want to treat them like almost like um their own digital employees they need to have like a corporate card kind of thing and traditional corporate cards can't be issued to non-human entities and so we're giving them stable coin wallets um they're doing a lot of machine to machine payments all very new in the last few months but it's been getting a lot of traction um so that's that's pretty exciting we built a couple of uh tools that allow any any agent to get a stable coin wallet inside it um AI agents or well I've been using claude and codeex a little bit just to like learn the develop the current development tools. I've been spinning that up locally on my laptop just to make sure I understand the current best tools the developers are using. Kobe actually writes a lot of code uh still in production. Yeah. Yeah. I I dabble, but I do not write that much code in production. I have to admire him for that. As a CEO, the main thing I use it for is research essentially of just like, okay, help me understand this and this how this works and then draft this for me. And internally with these data data report repositories now connected in I can use it for um decision- making and um we actually like we use a decision-m framework and there's a row now for the AI agent to write write in their input and it's like kind of nice to compare it to the other people on the team. Those are the primary ways that I use it today. Yeah, Okay. Okay. Well, the simple way to think of it is the base app is the the self-custodial version of Coinbase. We launched a new version of it recently, which frankly it was kind of polarizing. Like we put it out and it was trying to do something kind of novel on the social uh front and I don't think it quite worked. We got like a bunch of feedback from the community about that. Well, you could double tap to buy any post. Yeah, Well, it was interesting. So there was also there every post had its own um coin and also every creator had its own coin. Um it was optional for the creator. Um but what happened is if you bought a post some of the economics would flow back to the creator and we thought maybe each post would have like this up and down like it would have residual zero value. It turned out like many of the posts had um a couple thousand dollars of value or something at the at the terminal end of it and people were thinking of it as a way to I guess reward and thank the creator but they also own some of the creator coin. Long way of saying I think something is going to work in this space around um they call it social or like you know these kind of social media tokens. I don't think that the tokconomics has not quite been figured out yet where um it needs for for the people, you know, investing in them. um it needs to have some sort of like durability to like the you know they have to believe okay David Senra is going to continue to make great content into the future and he's relatively undiscovered now but he's going to be much bigger in the it's kind of like you know a company or something and they would want to own your creator token and there be some value and maybe like a revenue stream would acrew to them over time depending on your ad revenue or you'd have to come up with something like that that I think it's a little bit more durable in the current incarnation it wasn't quite there in my view so we tried it as an experiment didn't quite work. Um, the app is since pivoted to really just be more focused on like trading and being like a self-custodial version of the Coinbase app. So, we're starting with that for now, but I I do think something in the social uh token space will eventually work. Yeah, New Limit. I love the idea of just lowering the barrier barrier of entry to innovation, entrepreneurship. Brian, this was awesome, man. Thanks for taking the time to do it.

アームストロング#202

こちらこそ。ありがとう。

---

EN

Yeah. Like one of the key things we did actually was that twice a year any employees can come pitch and and say, "Hey, I think we should be doing this and I have the team to go do it." And in most companies, you have to get your boss to say yes, your boss's boss, your boss's boss, all the way up to the CEO. So you have to get like five yeses in a row, which is basically a committee. And if one person says no, it won't happen, which means the company's risk averse. What we've tried to set up internally is um we call these next bets, but you can come in and pitch. So each of the product group leaders has their own budget. you know, I'm there. Um, CFO is there, like Emily, maybe one or two like really talented young engineers. And if you get any one of us to say yes and fund it out of your budget, you're green lit. So, um, it's kind of like coming in and pitching like 10 venture capitalists. Yeah. So, you only need to get one yes if someone fun wants to fund it out of their budget, which is Yeah. And there's actually been examples where I voted no on something um and turned out to be a massive success. And an example of that is like USDC that which is the stable coin. I actually embarrassed to admit I voted no on that idea. Luckily somebody else funded it out of their budget and it's I think in 2025 we did like 800 million revenue off it or something. It was so it tells you you know [laughter] sometimes good ideas can come from anywhere. It's like actually you know reading about Steve Jobs and Waznjak that Waznjak whatever he went to his employer HP and told him hey I think we should make a personal computer. They said no and then he left to found Apple. So many such cases. Sam Walton tried to give away the idea for Walmart. [laughter] They said no. How much uh time do you spend on Coinbase marketing? are you interested in at all? You guys are doing very unique things around marketing. I saw this So they realized on short form that you can have somebody speaking but then if you put something somebody like playing a video game or whatever the case is or going through a maze the retention goes through the roof. Everything is marketing. I like that you had this. I'm going to do I have to do the calls anyways. Like, why don't you actually make them interesting? You said you uh you know you have to get attention. People have to pay attention to like what we're doing or they're not gonna like it kind of serves the mission too. There's a great maximum from David Olga about this. He says you can't save souls in an empty church. Yeah. Yeah. Well said. and you read them, they're technically about a public company, but they're fascinating. He's essentially he he thought of it as like he's just teaching. How do you compose your shareholders? Bezos is see Buffett's different because it's like 70 years or whatever. Bezos I think did it for 21 years. He distilled it down to maximums where his last shareholder letter was like differentiation is survival. I've ever seen I've ever read. I think Bezos was teaching his very interesting philosophy. Yeah. It's a great point. I hadn't thought about it. I mean, we could put more of like you said do you prefer being prompted like when you said it's better if I said like we put a deck but let me just film just film me going through the deck. Yeah. I would argue that the Buffett shareholders is the most successful example of content marketing in history. Well, I think there are a number of analysts that are reading the shareholder letter. So I don't want to say there's none, but um I think most people like retail investors, even people who aren't specifically tracking public company stocks like in that level of detail. They're consuming podcasts that probably listen to your podcast. Um they're they're reading social media like X. They're reading blog posts, Substack. Um, I think some of them still read traditional media, but that's dwindling, especially amongst people under say 65 or something. Every company is a media company now. Like, you should be publishing your own content direct to your own blog, social media. Some companies have their own podcast. Um, I don't you never should be going like through I I really don't like this idea of putting information out as a company through um a traditional journalist who's going to bring their own bias and filter to it. So, Well, um part of it was just having um I mean we talked about the mission first blog post, like after that happened I think several traditional media organizations wrote just very uh negative and false stories about us. Um, and it just made me really um, appreciate like how they're not doing journalism like in the traditional sense of the word that I think of it, which is to go report the facts and investigate things which need uncovering in the world, which is a very important thing. They're actually more like political propaganda machines. And if it doesn't fit their narrative, then they're they'll put out stories which are fake, misleading. I shouldn't have been surprised. There's like a long history of this going back to like, you know, yellow journalism and Joseph Positzer. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Um and they're like you're not informed. I was like have you read William Randle first biography? [laughter] And more exaggerated. What was that experience like? And like some law that I remember Mark and Dre told me about this where like when automobiles first came out in cities you there somebody passed a law you had to like run in front of the car with a flag. Yes. So yeah inherently if you are crypto is is a brand new industry. It's updating all financial services. And it's like that Gandhi quote you know like first they ignore you and they laugh at you and they fight you and then you win. So we're we're at stage three. They're they're now there's a little bit of fighting happening but actually honestly most of the big banks and financial institutions are embracing crypto and like five five of the you know GI banks in the world the largest banks are working with us now on crypto integrations if you look at their LinkedIn post they're all hiring crypto people product managers and engineers so it's working it's up and we want to work with all of them this is like a little blip on the policy radar that's just a little negotiation happening Peter Teal says you have to be contrarian but right to be an entrepreneur so you have to comfortable looking stupid for like a long time when I was calling those banks and saying, "Hey, we want to we're a crypto company. Want to do this?" And they would hang up on me or, you know, I'd go pitch the 30th Venture investor and get a no. Um or, you know, the thousandth employee we tried to hire or whatever. you were willing to be misunderstood for a long time and then you slowly start to have these breakthroughs and all a lot of the best you know if you look at like Uber you know they were fighting for a decade to just be like yeah it's actually better and safer than a cab and entrenched interests were fighting them right or Airbnb with the hotels you know self-driving cars like everything that's truly innovative and breakthrough is going to upset an entrenched incumbent eventually intersect with the government and just piss off some some segment of the population who kind of were like how dare you question the status quo you know and um the Wright brothers I mean when the when they came out with the airplane nobody believed them for like for years I mean you you know you read the biography um they went to the United States government like we've have this we've created flight you know they thought be celebrated and they were like yeah they went to Europe Yeah. So, it that's the nature of innovation is like you have to be willing to be misunderstood. And then the key part is you have to also be right which is you can't just be throwing out crazy ideas which are wrong and That's true. it's true. Well I think Orville and Wilbur were more like Yeah. So, not to torture this analogy too much, but I think of Wilver and Orbal as kind of like um inventors. The equivalent in this case would be like Satoshi Nakamoto or someone like that. Brilliant. Um you know, whoever they are, there's actually there's an interesting documentary coming out on this soon. Um, you know, whoever those people are, they're they're probably like innovators, scientists. I I don't consider myself really a scientist. I'm more of like an engineer, an entrepreneur. So, I recognized early what was happening with the invention of Bitcoin, but I didn't I didn't invent Bitcoin myself. You know, I did not discover flight like the Wright brothers. So, I don't I always had a lot of respect for people that are um like, you know, Edison and these people, right? like cuz they're actually on the frontier making scientific breakthroughs. Who knows, maybe this would happen at some point, but I don't think I'm going to be the person to make a scientific breakthrough. What I am going to do is um have an instinct or a nose that like something interesting is happening here and it's created an opportunity and I can go commercialize it with a really successful company. You started another company. You want to talk about this? for centuries. for sure. I reached out a couple friends of mine who had done they were biotech CEOs or PhDs and started to host some dinners and this is a good way just to learn too is like try to see if you can convene some of the top people in the room and just go around the table and ask them what's the most interesting thing on the horizon that's underfunded or under invested in. We hosted a couple of these dinners. Um was lucky enough to do this with a friend of mine, Blake Buyers, who eventually we co-ounded this company with. And one of the topics they told us about was um epigenetic reprogramming, which is the ability to reprogram cells and you can restore function they had when they were younger. There were some early uh breakthroughs that had happened in different labs. Uh one example of this was Shiny Yamanaka who won the Nobel Prize for reprogramming skin cells into stem cells. Um I think he he got that in 2005 if I'm not mistaken. And so I started to feel a little bit about epigenetic reprogramming like I did about Bitcoin when I first read about the Bitcoin white paper. And I was like, how deep does this rabbit hole go? And if you can actually reprogram cells, it turns out our cells are much more plastic than people realized, you know, what could be possible with that? And so through a series these dinners, I met we met the other co-founder, Jacob Kimmel and um Greg Johnson and created this company. It's called New Limit. and it's a longevity company uh searching for novel therapies that can reprogram your cells to restore function they had when they were younger. So it's been going about 3 or 4 years now. Um we've demonstrated successfully programming human cells for the first time to restore function. It's a discovery platform that's testing tens of thousands eventually millions of hypotheses in high throughput screens across lots of different cell cell types. It's using AI to prioritize those screens and um the first uh drug can that's going to go into clinical trials probably next year. So it's gone faster than I thought actually. I I um committed 100 million of my own money to it um to hope to help it get off the ground and it subsequently raised more money from others as well. And I thought it was going to be like a pure research thing for maybe five, six years or who knows. It turned out the scientific progress happened a bit faster than we thought and we're ready to go to clinical trials now with the first drug candidate. Hopefully there'll be three, four, five drug candidates over the next 5 years. I do. Yeah. I mean, both within Coinbase, like there's lots of these product groups, and I think it's fun. Like, that's the most fun thing in the world is like is um is building companies that try to have positive impacts on the world, try to be useful, and I'm getting slowly better at it, [laughter] you know, over the over the decades hopefully, and learning a lot of painful lessons along the way. And so, yeah, I I I I don't want to get distracted and have too many things. Each one of these is really difficult, but I do think over the coming decades, I'll hopefully I'll start more companies. O, that's a tough question. Um, let me tell you why you think about it. Let me tell you why I asked. Cuz I was shocked when I was talking to Toby. He's like, he said something. I think it was on the episode that um if AI like the advancements in AI weren't happening right now, he thinks he wouldn't be the CEO of Shopify anymore. I don't feel the same way he does about that. I think um I mean AI is changing everything about how we work and lots of things in financial services. Sure. After Let's go there next. So, let me forget. Do you like being CEO? Yeah, I find it well I always clarify I find it very fulfilling which means that um it's sometimes very stressful, sometimes it's super fun, sometimes I just get my ass kicked like and I'm you know I'm like oh man that was a that was a rough day, right? You're just going you're [laughter] just going going and doing like the hardest things that get escalated to you because nobody else in the company, you know? So, but that's what creates fulfillment, right? It's a little bit like playing a video game or something. Like it needs to be a really hard level. It's a little outside your comfort zone for you to feel like, wa, okay, I I beat like a I was right at the limit of my ability. I think it's a very important topic because a lot of founder like the found the other founders that were in my YC batch that I went through um I saw many of them like burn out within three three four years. They would either uh it manifested in lots of different ways. Some of them would gain a bunch of weight, some would lose a bunch of weight. One of them like had they were like had hair falling out. I was like bald before starting a company. [laughter] Um but like they were like literally clumps of hair were falling out because of the stress. Um some of them got like addicted to prescription drugs like all. So dealing with stress as a founder is actually a very important topic because you need to eventually you can burn the candle at both ends for a period of years but eventually you'll burn out and you need to make it sustainable to have the impact you want to have over a period of many decades hopefully and so yeah the kinds of things that I baked in as a routine and there were I'd say every couple years I I felt like I hit a patch of burnout right and I had to change something up so I either have to like delegate more stop doing some piece of what I was doing, have fewer direct reports, and then have a routine around like sleep, exercise, and nutrition basically, and and some form of like you can call it meditation or prayer, whatever you want, but in the evening, you can go in the sauna, right? Or in the morning, you can just sit there and meditate for one minute or whatever it is. And I I have a pretty strict routine when I'm in work mode around like sleep, exercise, um what I eat, and then um just a like wind down time in the evening. And then, you know, on the weekends, I I mix it up and I'm like not so strict about things, but I even just wear the same thing every day, right? So, I'm pretty rigorous about that. And I'm in I basically just in this routine of get enough sleep, wake up, lift heavy things, and do zone two cardio and like meditate for a few minutes, and then get after it. It's basically like, you know, No, it's B. Don't look at screens would be the main the main thing, right? like you're if you're if you're if you're looking at work stuff on your laptop or your phone and like even something you just glance at for a second, it can like piss you off and then if I try to just go right to sleep after working. I have like stressful dreams about work and I just don't get well well rested. So there does have to be like I think a period of time to Oh like an like like an hour. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And you can read, watch stuff, sauna. Um whatever. Yeah, before we go to how AI is changing the way you're working inside Coinbase. Question for I was thinking about was Well, Coinbase is my full-time job, so it's like 99%. Yeah. I mean, if you looked at how you're spending time between the two companies. um yeah, Jacob Kimmel is the president operating that company dayto-day, and he's he's crushing it. He's incredibly uh talented CEO and business person. I talked to um I talked to Palmer Lucky about this because that's something I asked him. Like we have three companies. He's like no I really have like one. He's like 99% of my time is on and then he said something fascinating. He just like wakes up every day and tries to think of like the highest leverage thing he can do for that company. Yeah. That's exactly right. It's like it's so easy to get caught up in just doing short-term things, but you have to start your day usually with the thing that sucks that you it's the most important thing and it's usually it sucks. [laughter] Well, lots of ways. So, some of it is similar to other companies and some of it's different. The parts that's similar is like more and more of code is being written by these agents, more than 50% now. um customer support inquiries I think is about 60% answered by agents. Now Both. We're using vendors. We have a lot of custom models internally as well. We're testing different use cases. Um for instance around like compliance automation, we're building a lot of stuff in house. Um design totally you can really quickly rapidly prototype stuff and get it out there. Um we're even using it in within our finance function and like you know all to do FPNA and build models and things like that. So it's widely even even like decision-m in the company. The key was getting a lot of our data ingested like all the Google Docs and the Slack messages and the GitHub commits and the Salesforce and now like you can ask it really great questions like what what should I be more aware of as CEO and it's like did you know this team is not aligned on the strategy? I was like actually I didn't know that you know so [gasps] this is something you build yourself how are you using them personally any kind yeah a agents any kind of tools Just kidding. Did you see the treat today? I'm still a little confused. Tell me about the base app. I've watched the presentations. I've talked to you about it. I'm still confused. Is this the tap thing? I understand that. But then like then each post almost like had like its own market cap. But then what happens? What else has been on your mind outside of Coinbase and is it New Limit? Yeah. Well, um, you know, there's another project that I invested and helped get off the ground called, uh, research hub, which is trying to accelerate scientific research. They're trying to find novel ways for people to raise, um, like the funding problems in science are like a whole thing and replication is an issue. We can talk about that if you want. I think, you know, I'm I'm making through my family office, I'm making various investments in like companies that I think are doing innovative stuff on the frontier. I think sometimes about what are the other big ideas that could really unlock progress, right? One other idea I'm interested in is actually like special economic zones um in the US or or elsewhere where there's such a there's such a morass of red tape both federally and state and local to try to innovate sometimes that it's hard to get off the ground, right? like the that money transmitter license thing is an example that I mentioned where you need like you needed like five or 10 million dollars just to get the licenses and I you sometimes entrepreneurs can find a creative way around these things in the early days but for instance like look at like um I don't know nuclear energy right um it's it's basically impossible to get like a new nuclear power plant I shouldn't say impossible very difficult right now and if you had these special economic zones like like actually China's been very successful with this they have like Shenzhen is a special economic zone essentially right or like Hong Hong Kong or in the UAE they have these and um there's been examples of these around the world that have been unlocked a ton of value. My ideal world you'd have like 10 plots of land like take federal land in the US and designate them as special zones. So you could have one that's hey this is this in this sandbox you can iterate on nuclear reactor design in this one little area. You know we're okay maybe something bad will happen but it's contained in this in this area. we need to be on our front foot and like innovate there. Or have another one for um for biotech like accelerated trials or another one for crypto or another one for drones. There just like drones flying all over within this zone, you know, outside of traditional FAA rules and like allow people to really innovate and build startups. And if they get a product working through that rapid innovation in a in a regulatory sandbox, they can then go apply for the the license federally and then serve the rest of the US market. But the problem is it's like it's such a high barrier to entry to even try to get started in some of these markets with these new technologies. Um anyway, I think special economic zones could be cool. I might work on that at some point. Thank you. I appreciate it. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review and make sure you listen to my other podcast, Founders. For almost a decade, I've obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs, searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

FAQ

A. 英語原文・自動字幕について
なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは?

このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。 公式サイト(davidsenra.com)にはエピソード要約・ショーノートはありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは前提にしていません。 参照: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcrPOElyjiI

自動字幕の精度はどれくらい? どこが壊れやすい?

一般に YouTube 自動字幕の精度は条件で大きく変わります。 - 条件が良いと 85–95% 前後まで上がる例もある - アクセント・早口・専門用語・固有名詞・複数話者 で一気に落ちる このエピソードはインタビュー(2人会話)で比較的クリアですが、規制当局名・人名(Gensler / Ehrsam / Choi 等)・法律用語・バイオ/暗号固有名詞が多く、名前の誤変換が起きやすいタイプです。

この記事の英語で実際に見つかった/起きやすい誤変換は?

自動字幕原文に出やすい典型例です(日本語本文側では多くを修正済み)。

| 字幕に出た/出やすい表記 | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | Gary Gendler / Ganzo / Gansler | Gary Gensler(前 SEC 議長) | | Fred Ersome | Fred Ehrsam(Coinbase 共同創業者) | | Emily Choy | Emily Choi(Coinbase プレジデント兼 COO) | | biology of Austin | Balaji(Balaji Srinivasan。元 CTO) | | Toby Luke | Tobi Lütke(Shopify) | | Lee Kuanu | Lee Kuan Yew(シンガポール建国の父) | | Paul Bukite | Paul Buchheit | | Blake Buyers | Blake Byers | | Shiny Yamanaka | 山中伸弥(Shinya Yamanaka) | | Palanteer | Palantir | | Cypress(銀行取り上げ) | Cyprus(キプロス) | | Codling of the American Mind | The Coddling of the American Mind | | Mark and Dre | Marc Andreessen | | Libra chat | LibreChat(社内データ接続の OSS 系) | | sendora / enra | senra(スポンサースラッグの崩れ) |

つまり英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、学習用の対照テキストとしては有用でも、引用の一次ソースとしては動画そのものを優先してください。

日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している?

完全対応ではありません。 - 日本語は読みやすさのため発言をまとめ・整文している - 英語は自動字幕の切れ目が多く、発言数が日本語より細かい場合がある - ページでは話者(センラ/アームストロング)を手がかりに、順番で英語を紐づけている そのため「この日本語のこの1文 = この英語のこの1文」とは限らず、だいたい同じ話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。

上部トグル(英語原文 / 少し大きく)は何のため?

- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け。英語は約9.5pxの補助情報 - 英語を少し大きく … 約11px前後。対照しながら精読したいとき用 英語をメインにすると誤変換に引きずられやすいので、デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」にしています。

エピソード中のスポンサーは?

本文では省略。英語字幕上は Ramp(プレゼンティング)、HubSpot などが読み上げられる。番組エンディングの Founders 案内・ニュースレター案内も学習用の対話本文からはカットしている。

B. 人物・会社・固有名詞
Brian Armstrong / Coinbase とは?

Brian Armstrong(ブライアン・アームストロング) は暗号資産取引所・金融インフラ Coinbase の創業者・CEO。ビットコイン・ホワイトペーパー読了後、Airbnb 勤務の夜と週末にプロトタイプを作り、Y Combinator を経て成長。2021年頃に上場。本編の中心テーマの一つは、SEC との対立(執行・訴訟)と、ミッション「世界の経済的自由を増やす」。

David Senra(センラ)とは?

起業家伝記を扱う Founders ポッドキャストで知られるホスト。本番組 David Senra Show では創業者インタビューを行う。多くのゲストが Founders 経由で彼を知った、とエンディングでも述べられる。

Fred Ehrsam / フレッド・エアサム

Coinbase の共同創業者。ゴールドマン・サックス出身の FX トレーダー背景。本編では、取引ごとに損していた構造の発見、瀕死局面での補完、初期のオフィス対応などの逸話が出る。ASR では "Ersome" などと崩れやすい。

Gary Gensler / Elizabeth Warren

- Gary Gensler … 本編時点の「前 SEC 議長」として語られる。暗号への強い執行姿勢が批判的に語られる(話者の見解)。 - Elizabeth Warren … 上院議員。銀行規制を通じた影響力や、暗号・他産業への圧力が、アームストロングの視点で語られる。 本編の法的評価・動機の記述は話者の口頭・見解であり、当事者公式見解や裁判所の最終判断の要約ではない。

Clarity Act / 市場構造立法 / CFTC vs SEC

米国では金融の連邦規制が SEC(証券)CFTC(コモディティ) に分かれ、暗号資産の位置づけが曖昧だった、という説明。下院の Clarity Act 等でバケツ分けを明確にし、将来の恣意的執行を防ぐ、というのが本編の政策ストーリー。法案名・進捗は収録時点の口頭で、立法は改定・改名・廃案しうる。

Mission First ブログ / 職場の脱政治

2020年前後の社会運動・BLM・コロナリモート期に、タウンホールで社会問題が支配し始め、約300人の「ウォークアウト」(リモートではノートPCを閉じる形、と語られる)が起きた、という経緯。その後、職場ではミッション(経済的自由・暗号)以外は政治的にならない、という方針をブログで公表。反対者に退職パッケージを提示し、約5%が退出、と本編。今読むと無難に見えるが、当時は激しい反発があった、という対比が強調される。

行政手続法(APA)と SEC 訴訟

本編では、SEC がルール形成で業界と十分関与しなかったとして APA 違反も主張しつつ、双方が訴訟。最終的に罰金ゼロ・事業変更なしで勝ち、複数の判事が SEC の振る舞いを arbitrary and capricious と評した、新政権下で SEC が取り下げた、などと語られる。法務費の口頭レンジは 5,000万〜1億ドル、株価への下押しは 100〜200億ドル級(話者の体感・概算)。一次情報は裁判所記録・会社開示を優先。

USDC / Next bets

社内で年二回、誰でも新規施策をピッチできる Next bets。一人の予算ホルダーの Yes で開始できる、と説明。アームストロング自身が USDC に No したが他が予算を出し、口頭で 2025年に約 8億ドル 売上、という成功例。数字は口頭ベースで、開示と一致する保証はない。

Base アプリ

Coinbase の セルフカストディ版としての位置づけ。ソーシャル/投稿トークン実験は賛否が分かれ、トークノミクスが未完成として取引・セルフカストディ中心にピボットした、と本編。製品仕様は更新されうる。

New Limit / エピジェネティック・リプログラミング

アームストロングが共同創業・資金を入れたロンジェビティ企業。細胞を再プログラムし若年時の機能を戻す療法探索。山中因子などに触発。自分の 1億ドル コミット、臨床試験入りが近い、など話者の口頭。医療・投資の助言ではない。

ResearchHub / 特別経済区

科学の資金・再現性問題に取り組むプロジェクトへの言及。また、原子力・バイオ・暗号・ドローン等の参入障壁を下げる 特別経済区/規制サンドボックス構想(深圳・UAE 等の比喩)を「いつか取り組みたい」として語る。政策提案レベルのアイデア話。

Olaf Carlson-Wee / 初期採用

サポート責任者候補として「Google 経歴の安定候補」対「ビットコイン卒論+木こり直後のオラフ」を比較し、後者を採った逸話。後に暗号 VC で成功した、と語られる。初期の「紙の資格よりスパイクと情熱」採用の象徴。

University Tutor / Airbnb / アルゼンチン

- 大学時代の家庭教師マッチング事業(パッシブ収入志向)。 - Airbnb 勤務で国際送金の高手数料・不透明さを体感。 - アルゼンチン滞在でハイパーインフレと政策の長期衰退を観察 → ビットコインへの思想的接続。

C. 数字・時点について
法務 5,000万〜1億ドル/株価ダメージ 100〜200億ドルは確定?

本編の口頭レンジ・体感。特定年度の監査済み法務費・時価総額変動の公式分解ではない。

USDC 8億ドル売上(2025)・コード 50%・サポート 60%は?

収録時点の話者概算・社内感。IR や監査数字と一致する保証はない。製品・指標定義も変わりうる。

シリーズ A 2,500万/シード 60万/法律意見書 3万は?

創業期の口頭回想。ラウンド名・金額・投資家(USV、Ribbit、その後 a16z の B など)は概ね公開史と整合しやすいが、細部は一次資料で確認すること。

「勝訴・罰金ゼロ・変更なし」の法的ステータスは?

本編の整理。案件は複数・時期が長く、取下げ・判決・和解が混在しうる。正確な手続史は裁判所・会社開示を当たること。

D. 読み方・学習の使い方
どう読むのがおすすめ?

1. まず日本語だけで流れを掴む(SEC 対立 → ミッション・ファースト → 創業史 → 組織・AI・Base/New Limit) 2. 気になるターンだけ英語をトグル ON 3. 規制・訴訟・評価額・製品機能の引用は動画/一次資料へ

このパッケージに含まれるファイルは?

- 対話本文: article-ja.md - 見た目: article-ja.html - 日英対照(CRIT 用): article-bilingual.md - FAQ: FAQ-ja.md - 英語字幕クリーン: transcript_en_clean.txt - メタ: meta.json(slug: brian-armstrong