David Senra · JA + tiny EN

How Elon Thinks——イーロンはこう考える

How Elon Thinks

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラエリック
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

君の本『The Book of Elon——Elon Musk's most useful ideas in his own words』の先行コピーを持っている。さっき言ってたよね、このコピーは世界に4冊しかない、と。誰が持ってるの?

EN

All right, so I have an advanced copy of your book The Book of Elon Elon Musk's useful ideas in his own words. You just said something that there's only four of these copies in the world. Who has them?

エリック#2

かなり特別なリストだ。Naval Ravikant、MrBeast、Ivanka Trump、そして君。

EN

It's It's a pretty special list. It's like Naval Ravikant, Mr. Beast, Ivanka Trump, and you.

センラ#3

いいね。で、アイデアはこうだ。君は5年、何千時間もイーロンを研究してきた。ずっと個人的なヒーローだった。僕も本を何度も読んだ。面白かったハイライトやアイデアを次々投げて、君が何を面白く思うか、追加の文脈を足してほしい。

今朝コーヒーを飲みながら話してたのは、できるだけ多くの人を「作る側」に押し出すことの大切さだ。ディールメーカーはもう十分いる。プロダクトを作り、会社を建てる人が要る。一日中ディールばかりしてなくていい。イーロンがずっと語っている大きなテーマだ。

本の中で好きだった引用がある。「会社を始めるとき、最良のリスク調整後リターンが何か、成功しそうか、という視点では始めない。ただ起きるべきことを見つけて、起こそうとする。金を失っても、試す価値はあった。」時間とエネルギーを何に使うか、彼のマインドセットは?

EN

[laughter]

エリック#4

彼が攻めるのは、誰も取り組んでいない問題で、未来にポジティブなインパクトがあるものだ。それが彼の哲学で、すべてに入るときの姿勢だ。多くの人は彼が金動機だと思うし、起業家も「このビジネスモデルはいい」「失敗率が低いからセルフストレージを始める」みたいな話をする。彼の思考はまったくそうじゃない。文字どおり「宇宙に誰も狂ってないから、俺がやる会社だ」と言う。

EN

Okay, so the idea for this is you spent 5 years, thousands of hours studying Elon. He's been a hero a personal hero of yours for a very long time. I just want to like I obviously read and reread the book. I'm just going to like run through a bunch of highlights and ideas like that I thought were interesting and just kind of throw them to you and you see like what like what you find interesting about it or like add additional context. So something we were talking about when we were having coffee this morning is the importance of encouraging as many people as possible. Like we have enough deal makers. We need people making products and building companies. You don't need to be doing deals all day long. And that is like a main theme that Elon talks about all the time. And so he says this this quote in the book which I loved. I do not start companies with the standpoint of what is the best risk adjusted rate of return or what I think could be successful. I just find things that need to happen and I try to make them happen. I thought these things needed to get done. If the money was lost, okay, it was still worth trying. What is his mindset around what he chooses to spend his time and energy on?

センラ#5

本にいい一文がある。「起業家になりたいから、金を稼ぎたいから会社を始めるな。こう来い——世界に存在してほしかった、有用なものは何か。」

EN

He seems to attack problems that nobody else is working on that have a positive impact on the future. That's his philosophy and mindset going into everything he does. Which is I think you need a lot of people assume that he's money motivated or a lot of people are money motivated and you hear all these entrepreneurs all the time talking about like like this is a great business model. This is a good place to go in. I'm going to go start self storage because like the failure rate is so low. And then this is not how he thinks in any way, shape, or form. He literally says nobody else is crazy enough to try space. So that's the company I have to go build cuz nobody else is working on it and I can't.

エリック#6

パラドックスがある。誰もやっていないことをやる方が、むしろ成功しやすい。ユニークなことを強いられ、結果としてみんなにとって価値が高くなる。問題を解いている。人類に新しい能力を足している。コモディティ事業のもう一つを始めているわけじゃない。

EN

He has a great line in here. He's like don't start a company because you want to be an entrepreneur because you want to make money. It is better to approach from this angle. What is a useful thing you could build that you wish existed in the world.

センラ#7

SpaceXやTeslaを始めた文脈も大事だ。彼は大学の頃から、いや子供の頃からこれらの問題を考えていた。SFに強く影響されて、可能なことを考えていた。エンジニアリングを魔法だと言う。「以前は存在しえなかったものを作るのは、魔術師のようだ。誰が魔術師になりたくない?」本には一章ではなく、一セクションまるごと、エンジニアリングの価値についてある。優れたエンジニアが文明を築き育てる根本的な制約であり、会社を前に進める制約だ、と。「金はいくらでもある。制約は資本じゃない。本当に優れたエンジニアだ。」

EN

Yeah, I think there's a paradox there of like the thing that you can do that nobody else is working on is actually more likely to be successful. Like it forces you to try to do something unique that also ends up being more valuable for everybody else because you're solving a problem. You're adding a capability to humanity. You're not just starting another commodity business of some sort.

センラ#8

本当に優れたエンジニアをどう見つけるかは詳しく書いてある?

EN

about these problems since he was in college literally like even younger as a kid. He was a very influenced by sci-fi um and thinking about things that are possible. He talks about engineering as as magic. He's like if you build something that couldn't previously exist, that's like being a magician. And like who wouldn't want to be a magician? Like there's a whole section, not just a chapter, like a section in this book about the value of engineering and the fact that excellent engineers are the fundamental constraint on building and growing civilization and the constraint on advancing these companies. He's like I have all of all the money I need. Like the constraint is not capital. The constraint is truly excellent engineers.

エリック#9

インタビューのやり方だ。彼自身が優秀なエンジニアだから、という部分が大きい。例外的能力の証拠を探す、と言う。特定の問題を本当に解いた人を探し、過去に解いた難しい技術的問題について詳細を聞く。クソ見抜きレーダーがある。同じ質問をしても、彼ほど見極められない。常に現場に近いからだ。それが優位性だ。

未証明の若いエンジニアを雇う方にバイアスをかけ、驚くほどの説明責任と責任を渡す。会社の反復速度の利点の一部は、誰が何を知っているかをすぐ見極められることだ。戦時のスキップレベル昇進みたいに、有能な人を見つけてできるだけ速く責任を増やす。これらの会社はそう動く。

EN

Does he go into detail how he finds truly excellent engineers?

センラ#10

さっきBending Spoonsの創業者Luca Ferrariと話してて、面白いことを言っていた。若いインターンや若者を雇いたくて、「有能な人を見つけたら、そのキャパシティを飽和させる」と。習慣がない人の方が、悪い習慣がある人よりいい、という考え。既存のインカンベントから採ると、その悪い習慣がついてくる。起業の歴史で何度も出てくる。

もう一つ、起業の歴史で何度も出てくる——僕が一番好きな格言のひとつは、「卓越とは痛みを引き受ける能力だ」。イーロンの言い方はこうだ。「精神的な問題への対処は、自分がやっていることを本当に気にすることと、痛みを引き受けることだ。」

EN

Yeah, his like interview process. I mean, part of it a lot of it just comes from him being a really good engineer himself, right? So he you can take the questions like he looks for evidence of exceptional ability, he says. Um he looks for people who really solved a specific problem and he asks detailed questions about a hard technical problem that you solved in the past. And he's got a good … radar. Like you could ask those same questions and not have the same ability to scrutinize and determine who's truly excellent that he does because he's so close to all this all the time. But that's his advantage. He really biases towards hiring young unproven engineers and then giving them like a shocking amount of accountability and responsibility. And that's part of the benefit of the iteration rate of these companies is he can figure out who knows what works. You know, it's it's like in wartime how you get these like skip level promotions. You just find competent people and like give them more responsibilities fast as you can. Like that's how these companies operate.

エリック#11

地球上でいちばん生産的な人が、瞑想もジャーナリングも朝のルーティンもゼロゼロゼロ、というのがおかしい。起きて、電話で用を足して、仕事に行く。それがルーティンだ。仕事に行く。

EN

I was just talking to Luca Ferrari, who's the founder of Bending Spoons, and he said something that was interesting. He he wants to hire young like young interns or young people, and he says once you find somebody competent, you just saturate their capacity, which I thought was an interesting description. This idea of finding people that it it's better to have somebody like that has no habits than bad habits. So, like recruiting from existing incumbents.

センラ#12

本ではアイザックソンのイーロン伝も出てくる。僕ら二人とも何度も読んだ。僕もあの本でエピソードをやった。彼が何十年も繰り返すのは、「自分は戦争向きに配線されている」だ。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#13

類似の創業者を探しても、いちばん近いのはナポレオンくらいだ。他の創業者とは似ていない。彼らは今日の標準ベストプラクティスで会社を運営している感じだ。彼は常に動き、人を会社間で動かし、前線を動かし、補給を見る。非常に独特な運営だ。スケジューラを解雇した。「時間を完全に完璧にコントロールしたい。いちばん重要なことにすぐ取り組めるように。問題のある場所へ物理的にいつでも動けるように。」生産性の大きな柱のひとつだ。正しい仕事を正しい時間にやることには、パーセンテージではなく桁違いの生産性向上がある。

EN

Like that's something that reappears throughout the history of entrepreneurship. Another thing that reappears throughout the history of entrepreneurship, maybe my favorite maxim of all time from the history of entrepreneurship, is that excellence is the capacity to take pain. Elon has a great way of saying it. He says, "My way of dealing with mental problems is to make sure you really care about what you're doing and take the pain."

センラ#14

資源と人の移動についてもっと。

EN

Yeah. [laughter] I think it's so funny that the most productive person on Earth does zero zero zero of the like meditation, journaling, morning routine. Like he wakes up and pees on his phone and goes to work like every day. Like that's his routine.

エリック#15

過小評価されている利点のひとつは、問題が他社の人によって解かれることがよくあることだ。SpaceXでRaptorエンジンの生産性が本当の制約だったとき、担当の若い優秀なエンジニアが、Model 3の生産責任者を連れてきた。その人とラインを歩いて、泣いていた。航空宇宙のベストプラクティスは、SpaceX内でも、量産の考え方から何段も遅れていた。Model 3の男は「これが一番効率いいの? 改善の余地だらけだ」と言った。Model 3生産で学んだ「生産するか死ぬか」のスピードがあった。だからSpaceXは航空宇宙がかつて到達しなかった量産に達している。

EN

He goes to work.

センラ#16

友人のMax OlsonがSpaceXの本を書いていて、まだ出ていないが、僕ら二人とも大好きな優れたエッセイを出した。印刷して、目の前にノートがある。彼はイーロンの会社を通じて広がるミームと呼ぶ。エッセイの最後に五つのミームがある。第一は「槍の穂先フォーカス」。常に最大のリミッターを特定して攻撃せよ。二次問題に努力を散らすな。取り除けば下流のすべてが解ける単一の制約にレーザーを当てろ。このセクションでいちばん好きな一文はこうだ。「これはあらゆるレベルで真だ。各SpaceXサイトには単一の支配的目標がある。」優先順位を単純化する。NASAのマネージャーがSpaceXを訪れて観察したのは、新しい問題が出ると、廊下にフラッシュモブが現れるようだ、ということだった。

EN

Yeah. In in this book, we have uh Isaacson's biography of Elon, which you and I both have read and reread. I've done an episode on on that book as well. Yeah, he has this great thing that he would repeat for decades, that he is wired for war.

エリック#17

あのエッセイは最高だ。本当に重要な問いを投げている。多くの人が「イーロンはどうやってこんなに多くのことをやるのか」と言う。この本は本当にその答えのひとつだ。あのエッセイとこの本は、「SpaceXはなぜ特別なのか。なぜ誰も彼らがやったことを再現できていないのか」の検証だ。彼らが歩んできた道は何年も証明されている。エンジニアも金も多い人はたくさんいる。なのになぜ追いつかない? 近づきすらしていない。SpaceX以来、Boeingのミッション失敗の方が多い。よくない。

深層の答えは、文化と習慣とルーティン、人の選抜、そして組織を通じて広がるミーム——どう働き、どう問題を攻めるか——だ。組織全体がイーロンのように動くことを学ぶ、という説明だ。二つの極めて重要なスキルの組み合わせ——いちばん重要なことに取り組み、それを絶対に攻撃する。制約は何か。猛烈にかかれ。

EN

Yeah. Like we were trying to come up with any sort of analogous founders, and like the closest thing we can come to is like Napoleon. He's not analogous to other founders. They're sort of like operating companies as though like with standard best practices of today. He is like moving around constantly, moving people between companies, like moving the fronts, looking at supply like it's a very unique operating situation. He has no He fired his scheduler cuz he's like, "I want complete perfect control of my time. I want to be able to like work on the most important thing immediately. I want to be able to move whenever I want to the problem physically." That's like one of the big tenants of his productivity. I think there's so much to be said about doing the right work at the right time. It is a multiple order of magnitude productivity increase, not a percentage.

センラ#18

彼はミッション志向だ。人生のミッションがあって、それをやる。でも「やる、痛みを耐え抜く」以外のことも語る?

EN

Say more about moving around resources and people.

エリック#19

これについてのキラーな一文がたくさんある。「絶対に諦めない。死ぬか完全に動けなくなるまで。」さっき読んだ「精神的問題への対処は、気にしていることを気にして痛みを引き受けること」「どんなことがあってもやり遂げる」。「絶対に諦めないミッション」があると、すごく解放される。イーロンが張った賭けを張る起業家は少ない。彼ほど純粋にイデオロギー的・哲学的に動機づけられていないからだ。

第三の会社TeslaとSpaceX——第四の会社——を2億ドルで始め、世代の富と、それ以上に評判を全部賭ける。九桁の純資産に達したあと、ゼロに戻るリスクと公の屈辱を冒す起業家を、僕は彼以外に挙げられない。最低の谷で、他の誰かに金を出すよう頼む前に、自分で2億を会社に入れた。諦めない、諦めることすら考えない、船を燃やし続けて押し続ける能力は、ミッションへのマニアックな献身から来る。本当に重要なミッションだ。新しい惑星に行くことは、意識が続くか続かないかの差になりうる。そのミッションに本当に乗っているなら、もちろん公の屈辱を冒す価値がある。もちろん2億を冒す価値がある。もちろん週100時間働き、工場に住み、可能な限り誰でもリクルートし、最大限を求め、進捗を遅らせていると感じる人をクビにする価値がある。

自分に与えるすごいテストだ。「やっていることを諦める想像ができるなら、そもそも始めるべきか?」君もいつもそう言う。「死が出口戦略だ。このマイクは冷たい死んだ手からしか奪えない。」疑いなく人生のミッションに乗っている。振り返るべき面白い問いだと思う。

EN

Well, I mean, one of the underrated advantages is like all the time you see problems getting solved by people from other companies. And so, when there was like a a real constraint on Raptor engine productivity at SpaceX, the guy who the engineer who was in charge of that, a young, really talented engineer, um brought in the head of production from Model 3. And that guy like walked the line with that guy, and he was just sobbing because it like the aerospace best practice, even at SpaceX, was like way, way, way, way behind how they thought about the volume production. The guy from the Model 3. He was just like, "How is this your most efficient thing? Like, we can there's so much room for improvement because of what they learned on Model 3 production, which is like produce or die, very, very quickly." Um and that's why SpaceX has like reached this volume production that nobody in aerospace ever has.

センラ#20

彼は船を燃やすことを常に語る。Zip2の頃からそうだった。人間性の高度な理解がある気がする。本当に背中を壁に付け、オプションを自分に与えないと、アイデアを出したり、極端な仕方で自分を押し上げたりする。オプション性を最適化していると——うまくいかなければプランB——は違う。ジェフ・ベゾスの引用が好きだ。「プランBは、プランAをうまくいかせることであるべきだ。」

EN

So, we have a friend named Max Olson who's writing a book on SpaceX that is not released yet, but he just did this excellent essay that me and you both love, and we actually printed out. There's a bunch of notes in front of us. It's he he calls this uh the these memes that spread through Elon's companies. And he at the end of the essay he has these five memes. Number one was tip of the spear focus. Always identify and attack the biggest limiter. Don't spread effort across secondary problems. Laser in on the single constraint that if removed would unlock everything downstream. This is my favorite line from the section. This is true at every level. Each SpaceX site has a single dominating objective, right? To simplify simplify prioritization. A NASA manager who visited SpaceX observed that when a new problem appears, it looks like a flash mob appears in the hallway.

エリック#21

シュワルツェネッガーも同じことを言う。Zip2はいい例だ。多くの人は、彼が20歳前後で会社を始め、信じられないほどオールインしたことを覚えていない。初期のPayPalのローンチ日を感謝祭週末の土曜日に設定した。「このオフィスに来い。締め切りだ。」「なぜ感謝祭にローンチしなきゃいけない?」「ローンチすると言ったからだ。ここに来て24時間働け。終わらせよう。」それは彼という人間の帰結としての運営原則で、すべての会社で一貫している。

---

EN

Yeah, I that essay is excellent. And it asks a really important question, which is you know, a lot of people have talked about, and this book is really an answer to like, "How does Elon get so much done? This essay in this book is really an examination of like, why is SpaceX so special? Like, how has nobody been able to replicate what they've been able to do? The path that they've been on has been proven for years. Like, there's lots of people with more engineers and more money. So, like, why can't they catch up? Like, they're not even really getting closer. Like, there's been more mission failures at Boeing since SpaceX. Like, this is not is not good. And so, this is unpacking that and the answer The deepest answer is like the culture and the habits and the routines, the selection of the people, and then the memes that spread through the organization, how they work, and how they attack problems. And so, I think that is a great description of like the whole organization learning to operate like Elon does, which is a combination of two extremely important skills, which is like, find the most important thing to work on, and then absolutely attack it. Like, what's the limiting factor? Go ape … on

センラ#22

本の中で、あるいは君がプロフィールした中で、彼は恐怖について多く語る。「恐怖を感じろ、それでもやれ。恐怖をまっすぐ目に見ろ、すると消える。恐怖の本質は、人がそれを見ないことだ。直接見ろ、消える。」これらはイーロンの直接の引用だ。「十分重要で、十分信じているなら、恐怖にかかわらずやる。恐怖を感じるのは普通だ。感じないなら、何か精神的に問題がある。感じて、ミッションの重要性に駆動されてやれ。」

EN

I know he's mission-oriented. He's like, I have a mission in life, this is what I want to do. But, does he talk about anything other than I'm going to do this and essentially persevere through pain?

エリック#23

これらの事業の目的駆動の性質は、成功の極めて強力な部品だ。イーロンだけじゃない。同じようにミッションを感じ、押し上げられたい人を引き寄せる。「この会社に、自分のポテンシャルを全部絞り出してほしい。このミッションにすべてを捧げたい」と思って仕事に行く人がどれだけいるか。ほとんどの人の考えじゃない。でもこれらの会社に行く人はそう思う。会社の成功を駆動する強力な力であり、その環境に飛び込みたい人にとっても素晴らしい。だからTeslaが自動車業界の残りを蹴散らし、これからもそうする。

EN

Oh, he's got some absolutely killer lines about this. Like, I don't get I don't ever give up. I'd have to be dead or completely incapacitated. Um, the one you just read about like, my way of dealing with mental problems is to just care what I'm care about what I'm doing and take the pain. Come hell or high water, we're going to get this done. Like, there's so much unlocked when you have a mission that you know you would never give up on. Like, so few entrepreneurs I think would make the bets that Elon has made because they're not truly purely as ideologically and philosophically motivated as he is. Like, to think about, you know, his third company, Tesla and SpaceX, fourth company, to start with $200 million and put your entire like generational wealth and reputation, maybe even more importantly, on the line, is like how many entrepreneurs that you know that have risked going back to zero and public humiliation once they reach a nine-figure net worth. Like he's the only one I can name. Uh and that happened at like the the lowest of the low point. And he he was all in before he asked anybody else to put in any money. $200 million into his own companies. And that ability to not give up and not even think about giving up and just burn the boats and keep pushing and keep pushing comes from this maniacal devotion to the mission because it is a truly important mission. Like getting us to a new planet could mean the difference between like consciousness continuing or not continuing. Like if you are truly in on that mission of course it's worth risking public humiliation. Of course it's worth risking $200 million. Of course it's worth working 100-hour weeks and living in the factory and recruiting anybody that you possibly can and demanding the most of them and firing anybody who's like feels like they're slowing down the progress. It's a really incredible test actually to give yourself that like if you can imagine giving up on what you're doing would you but like should you even start it? I know you talk like this all the time. You're like death is my exit strategy. You'll pry this mic from my cold dead hands. Like you are unquestionably on the mission of your life and that's a really I think it's a really interesting question to reflect on.

センラ#24

興味深かったのは、本を買った人や誰かに渡した人が何を持ち帰ってほしいか、と聞いたときだ。ポイントは何か。最後に何が起きてほしいか。君の答えは?

EN

He talks about burning the boats constantly. And he did this from like day one. Like even with like Zip2. I do think there is some kind of like an very advanced understanding of human nature that if you truly are putting your back against the wall and not giving yourself any options like you will come up with ideas or like push yourself to in in a manner in an extreme manner in which you just can't. If you if you're optimizing for like optionality or it's like oh if this isn't work out I have like a plan B. I love Jeff Bezos's quote on this. Bezos is like the plan B should be to make plan A work.

エリック#25

この本への希望はたくさんあるが、包括的なのは「この本が100万人のマスクを生むこと」だ。人生の青写真をなぞれという意味じゃない。電気自動車会社を始めろという意味でもない。誰もやっていないユニークな問題を見つけて、それを解くことに人生を捧げろ。人類に新しい能力を足すもの。新しいものを作れ。イーロンの人生から僕が得た最大の教訓は、「私たちは自分が思っているよりずっと多くが可能だ」ということだ。

EN

Yes. I think like Schwarzenegger says the same thing and I think it's worth like Zip2 is a good example. Most people don't like remember that he started a company at whatever 20 um and went all in on it unbelievably hard. He was a little He was a little actually, but like he was doing these insane like surges and deadlines and things. He set their initial launch date uh for PayPal on like Saturday of Thanksgiving weekend. He's like, "Get your ass in this office. Like we have a deadline." Like, "Why do we have to launch on Thanksgiving?" He's like, "Because I said we're launching on Thanksgiving weekend. Like get in here, work 24 hours. Like let's get it done." It's been an operating principle that is an outcome of who he is and has been consistent through all of these companies.

センラ#26

それが君が言ったことだ。

EN

I want to tell you about the presenting sponsor of this podcast, Ramp. I have been reading a lot about SpaceX lately. SpaceX is one of the most valuable private businesses in the world and one of the main themes in the history of SpaceX is constantly attacking and questioning your costs. Ramp helps many of the most innovative businesses in the world do exactly that. The median company running on Ramp cuts their expenses by 5% and one thing SpaceX has demonstrated is that a religious dedication to controlling costs can help actually increase revenue because you can pursue opportunities you couldn't otherwise. And we see that in the Ramp data, too. The median company running on Ramp also grows their revenue by 16%. So, when you're running your business on Ramp and your competitors are not, you have a massive competitive advantage that compounds over time. Ramp is the only platform designed to make your finance team faster and happier. Many of the top founders and CEOs I know run their business on Ramp. I run my business on Ramp and you should, too. Go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time, save money, and grow revenue. That is ramp.com.

エリック#27

彼は特別だが、超人じゃない。自分から信じられない量を引き出す方法を見つけただけだ。不利もたくさんあった。この話を聴いている多くの人は、イーロンよりずっと良い手札で人生を始めている。

EN

He talks a lot in the book or in you profiled him in the book about fear. He says, "Feel the fear, do it anyways. Look fear straight in the eye and it will disappear. The nature of fear is that people don't look at it. Look at it directly and You know, be gone." These are direct quotes from Elon. When something's important enough and you believe in it enough, you do it in spite of fear. It is normal to feel fear. If you don't feel fear, you definitely have something mentally wrong. Just feel it and let the importance of your mission drive you to do it anyway.

センラ#28

不利を説明して。多くの人は、特権から来たと思っている。批判者がよく言う。

EN

I think the purpose-driven nature of these businesses is a extremely powerful piece of their success. Because that's not just Elon, it attracts people who feel the same way about the mission and who want be pushed. Like how many people go into their jobs and they're like, "God, really I want this company to just ring all of the potential out of me. I want to give everything possible to this mission." It's not what most people think. Um but it is how the people who go work at these companies think. And that's an incredibly powerful thing for to drive the success of the company, but it's also great for the people who want to hop into that environment. Like that's why Tesla's kicking the rest of the auto industry's ass, like and will continue to.

エリック#29

よく調べた見解じゃないと思う。父はエンジニアで起業家で、キャリアに浮き沈みがあったが、より定義的な特質は——僕は会ったことがないが、アイザックソン伝の記述やKimbalとイーロンの証言では——ナルシシストで虐待的で操作的で誇大だ。アイザックソンは強迫的な嘘つきだと言っていた。嘘を多くつく。輝きはあったが、本当に暗い。信頼できず、子供たちに常に嘘をついた。イーロンは8歳でリビングに立たされ、何時間も父親に罵倒された。「意味のない一言」じゃない。顔に向かって叫び、価値がない、役立たず、バカだと言う。幼い少年に。その燃料が何を満たすか想像してほしい。イーロンは悪魔に鋤を引かせる方法を見つけた。それをほとんど生産的でポジティブなものに変えた。

ひどく殴られた事件もある。喧嘩に負けた、じゃない。子供の集団に踏みつけられ、病院に一週間、顔がわからなくなった。父はいじめっ子側に立ち、喧嘩を売ったバカだと呼んだ。信じられないほど残酷な出発点だ。特権だったという噂の一部は、父が嘘をついて成功の一部の功績を取ろうとしたことから来る。関係はこじれ、ここ数十年いろいろ奇妙なことがあった。

イーロンは17歳でカナダに移民として到着し、学費を自分で払い、学生ローンを抱えて卒業し、初期インターネットブームで最初の会社を始めるためにスタンフォード大学院を退学した。最初の数字は忘れたが2200万——

EN

Yeah, that was interesting when I asked you like what what do you hope people take away like if you know, they buy the book, they they read it or they give it to somebody else. Like what is the point? Like what do you want to happen at the end? And what was your answer to that?

センラ#30

本にいい一文がある。Compaq Computerに現金3億700万で売った。「銀行口座が5000ドルから2200万になり、また5000ドルになった。」

EN

I have many hopes for this book, but the overarching one is like I hope that this book can generate like 1 million Musks. Like I I don't mean go follow his life blueprint. I don't mean start electric car company, but I mean figure out a unique problem that nobody else is working on and dedicate your life to solving it. Like a thing that adds a new capability to humanity. Build a new thing. Biggest lesson of Elon's life to me is like we are all capable of so much more than we think.

エリック#31

メールボックスに小切手を持って立って「わあ」という感じで、学生ローンを払った。最初の財産は自分で作った。その時代、アパートとオフィスの両方は払えず、オフィスを借りてYMCAでシャワーを浴び、常に働き、ラップトップと本と学生ローンだけが起点だった。最初のシードマネーは自分で稼ぎ、Zip2で得たもののほとんどを、翌週にはx.com(後のPayPal)の立ち上げに回した。

EN

That is what you said to me.

センラ#32

本にいい一文がある。大学の頃かもしれないが、「破産か富裕か、その中間はない」と悟った、と。

EN

He's special, but he's not superhuman. He's just figured out how to get an unbelievable amount out of himself. And you know, he had a lot of disadvantages. Like a lot of people listening to this are going to have a lot better hand to start life with than Elon did.

エリック#33

そのサイコロを何度も振った。

EN

Explain some of the disadvantages because a lot of people think that he like came when he He like privileged. It's something you'll hear like a lot of his critics say.

センラ#34

君はアイデアを見出しの格言(マキシム)として分解するのが本当に上手い。僕は格言に弱い。そのひとつはFounders Podcastから来ていて、ありがたい。「ビジネスをAからZまで知っていれば、解けない問題はない。」なぜそれをイーロンに当てはめた?

EN

Yeah, I don't think that's a particularly like well-informed take. Um, his dad was an engineer and an entrepreneur and he had ups and downs in his career, but the more defining trait of his dad was that he's uh I I've never met the dude, but like by all accounts in the Isaacson biography, he did have like a lot of surface area with him and from accounts from Kimball and Elon, he's like a narcissistic, abusive, manipulative, grandiose.

エリック#35

僕にとっての格言の全リスト——107——から始めて、イーロンが良い例だと思ったものにチェックを入れた。だいたい75。もう一度見て、「彼が象徴的な範例になりうるものは何か」と。15か16くらい。イーロンがバランスの取れた起業家であることの証でもあり、格言が偉大な起業家になる特質を記述する力の証でもある。「ビジネスをAからZまで」については、彼がいちばんよく体現している。バナナ男——

EN

I think Isaacson said he like a compulsive liar.

センラ#36

本のタイトルは『The Fish That Ate the Whale』だ。

EN

Compulsive liar, yeah, fabricated a lot of things. Um he had brilliance, but he was also really dark. Um, he's unreliable and he would lie to the kids all the time. I mean Elon at like eight would stand in the living room and be berated by his father for hours. It's not just like a mean comment. Um he'd scream at his face and call him worthless and useless and stupid and like as a young young boy. Like imagine what that the fuel that that fills you with as a kid and the I mean and Elon figured out how to like make the demons pull the plow. Like he turned that into something really productive and really positive for the most part. And there's another case where he got beat up very badly. Like it's not like lost a fight. Like stomped by a gang of kids and was in the hospital for like a week. Unrecognizable face. And his dad sided with the bullies and like called him stupid for picking a fight. And that is that is an unbelievably brutal place to start. Um, and so I think some of these rumors about like how privileged he was actually come from his dad lying and trying to take credit for some of his success. Um, and they've had a strained relationship and all kinds of weird stuff has happened over the last couple decades, but Elon arrived and as an immigrant to Canada at 17, paid his way through college, graduated with student debt, dropped out of Stanford uh graduate school to start his first company in the early internet boom and like basically made I forget the exact first number 22 million

エリック#37

大好きな本のひとつ。Rich Cohen著。三回くらい読んだ。高いエージェンシーと深い専門性の本で、ホンジュラスかグアテマラかの農園からバナナ帝国を動かした男。イーロンは現代の製造のその例だ。ラインに住み、問題のところへ行き、プロダクトだけでなくプロダクトの背後の物理への深い理解がある。材料が何をできるか、閾値はどこかへの深い直感の話がたくさんあり、エンジニアと設計を何度も何度も失敗点まで押し、最もエレガントで単純で効率的な版を見つける。

EN

he says it's a great line in the book cuz they sold for 307 million in cash to compact computer

センラ#38

例を。

EN

yep

エリック#39

ひとつはStarshipのステンレス溶接の厚さだ。設計エンジニアが一つの数字を出し、実際に溶接している連中に聞くと「4.5mmくらいだと危ういかも」と言う。彼は「4mmを試そう」と言い、4mmは効いた。ステンレスへの移行自体も。以前の多くのロケットはカーボンファイバーだった。扱いにくく大きい。彼には直感があり、ステンレスは低温で強度が増すと知っていた。軌道に乗ったロケットは強くなる——忘れやすいことだ。だから何度も人を押し、より安く、扱いやすいものを使い、可動部品を減らす。

僕のイーロン要約は、David Goggins級の強度、Richard Feynman級の型破りな技術的輝き、ナポレオンの戦略的天才と狂気の行動バイアス。この三つの特質が合わさって信じられないほど特異になり、そこに投入する時間量がある。ビジネスをAからZまで知るためにこの時間を入れても、物理と材料の基礎への深い技術的直感がなければ、彼がする判断や押し方はできない。

もちろん常に正しいわけじゃない。もちろんエンジニアが実際の仕事の最大量をやっている。でも君が言うように、創業者は会社の魂の守護者だ。彼はそこにいてバーを上げ、人を押す。「失敗は本質的に無関係だ。壊滅的でなければ。」大好きな一文だ。だから物を破壊点まで押し、材料を押し、設計を押す。最も効率的な設計だと確実に知る点に達したい。その情報を明らかにする失敗は、百万倍で報われる。エンジンを1万個作る。1万回複製する非効率は入れたくない。あらゆる設計判断で500回失敗して、スケールアップするときに最もエレガントなものを持っていると知りたい。

EN

and he goes my bank account went from $5,000 to $22 million and $5,000

センラ#40

人を驚かせることのひとつは、アイザックソンの本で僕が言ったように、本の半分は彼が人に「単純化しろ、削除しろ」と怒鳴っているだけだ、ということだ。格言がある。「天才には可動部品が最も少ない。」Raptorエンジン設計のミームがある。時間とともに三つあって、こんがらがった地獄から美しい単純さへ。ステンレス対カーボンファイバーの決断を読んでいた。「カーボンファイバーは高くて扱いにくく、巨大なオートクレーブが要る。」彼は「ステンレスならテントで溶接できる。」

EN

yeah so which is just like he's like standing in the mailbox holding this check being like wow and he yeah that that like paid off his student debt and so he made his first like fortune by himself and in that era was like he said he couldn't afford an apartment and an office so he leased an office and he showered at the YMCA like worked constantly all he had was a laptop and like some books and student debt like that's his starting place and he earned his first seed money from and everything most of what he made from Zip2 he rolled right back into starting like the week later starting x.com which became PayPal

エリック#41

文字どおり駐車場のテントでロケットを建てている。非常にイーロンらしい——プロダクトの進捗に必要なことだけやれ。

失敗にもう少し留まりたい。過小評価されている部品だと思う。イーロンが使うこれらの格言やキャッチフレーズを並べると、パターンが出る。組織を、できるだけ速く小さな失敗を作るように設計している。「削除したものの10%を戻していないなら、十分取っていない。」つまり、動かないものを作れ、なぜ動かなかったかを理解し、最小限を戻して最も効率的な版だと知れ、という命令だ。

締め切りを設定するとき、「50%の確率で間に合う締め切りを選ぶ。締め切りの半分は外し、それで全然いい。できるだけ速く動き、誰も間に合わないと思った締め切りもいくつか守る。締め切りを100%守っているなら、遠すぎる。与えた時間は少なくとも消費する。」

人には固有のバイアスがある。特に仕事がかかっている、同僚の前でよく見せたい、会社をうまく回したい、失敗と見られたくない。エンジニアは一般に「プロダクトを失敗させたくない」。これらの文化と格言が強化するのは、「失敗すべきだ」ということだ。採用のとき、「やらかした四つのやり方を言えないなら、本当の仕事をしていない」と言う。

EN

yeah there's a great line in the book I think he might have been in college where he's like he figured he's either going to be broke or wealthy but nothing in between

センラ#42

まさにその引用を今探していた。

EN

and he rolled that dice like a bunch of times

エリック#43

いい一文だ。組織を小さな失敗を持つようにエンジニアリングしていなければ、 antifragile の考え——途中で失敗してより良いプロダクトへ極めて速く反復することを学ばなければ、全体に脆弱性と非効率を作っている。

EN

you do a really great job of breaking down the ideas and essentially under like these headings of maximums and you know I'm a sucker for maximums one of them actually came from Founders Podcast which I appreciate and it says if you know your business from A to Z there's no problem that you can't solve why did you apply that to Elon?

センラ#44

この番組の最初のエピソードのひとつでMichael Dellと話して、彼もそう言っていた。「新しい技術と新しいビジネスモデルで新しい事業を発明しているとき、プレイブックはない。本を読んでこうやれ、とはいかない。隣接産業から人を雇っても、昔のやり方をするだけだ。唯一のやり方は実験と——」彼は「直観する」という言葉も使ったと思う。「仮説を持ち、仮説を試す。だからミスが欲しい。学ぶ方法だ。でも小さく、同じミスを繰り返さない。」君がイーロンについて言っていたことのエコーだ。

目の前の本の部分ともつながる。イーロンの会社は、現実を検証ツールとして使いたい。真実に至ることが本当に重要だ、と言う。「ビジネスでも個人生活でも、希望的観測が多くのミスを生む。何かが真かどうか問わなければならない。希望的観測は自然な人間の傾向だ。」また直接引用だ。「新しいアイデアを信じ粘り強くやるのか、非現実的な夢を追うのかの区別は難しい。スタートアップの本当のテストは、逆境にどう応え、どう適応するかだ。多くのものは最初あまり意味をなさないが、速く適応すれば会社は動く。真実に執着し超集中することが極めて重要だ。あらゆるソースからフィードバックを探せ。」

EN

I started with the the full list of maximums according to me which is like 107 and I checked I went down the list and I checked all the ones that I felt like Elon was a good example of which is like 75

エリック#45

教師としての現実への反復は、Max Olsonのエッセイのもう一つの優れた要素だ。NavalはDavid Deutschのアイデアを会社建設に当てはめるのがすごく上手い。会社の目標は新しい知識を発見すること——現実と相互作用し、プロダクトにインスタンス化する。この反復と実験のサイクルが現実に対してチェックする方法だ。あらゆる知識の作られ方だ。遺伝子の変異と選択、科学の仮説と検証。でも組織を「どれだけ新しい知識が生まれているか、何回実験しているか、どれだけ速く安く失敗を作れるか」で考える人は少ない。

EN

Mhm

センラ#46

もう一文。「ロケットが軌道に乗るという信念と両立しない信念を持っているなら、ロケットは軌道に乗らない。物理は厳しい審判だ。」自分へのメモとして何度も繰り返す。「物理は法則、他のすべては推奨。」

EN

and then I went down again and was like what are the ones that he's like could be an iconic exemplar of and it was like 15 or 16 so I think that's a good testament to like the not just Elon as a well-rounded entrepreneur but also like the ability of the maximums to describe the traits that become an incredible entrepreneur um the business from A to Z I think this seems to me as the one who like best he exemplifies this like the banana man

エリック#47

その分岐は「物理は君の感情を気にしない」。人に何度も繰り返す。「どうしてそんなに速く人を裁いたりクビにしたりチームを——」に対して、「テストは一つ。クリアするバーは一つ。ロケットは飛ぶか。軌道にどれだけペイロードを乗せられるか。最適化しているメトリクスは一つ。その平和に向かって行進し、そのバーをクリアするために必要なことをする。」アスペルガーが本当に有利に出るところだ。「好かれたい欲求は多くの人が持つ巨大な不利だ。俺にはない。」ストレートに「その弱さはない」と言う。

Peter Thielの興味深い観察がある。なぜ成功したテック創業者の多くがスペクトラムのどこかにいるように見えるのか。なぜ他者の意見を退ける生物学的優位があるのか。イノベーターになり新しいものを建て、偉大な組織を建てるためにそのスキルが必要だという社会について、何を言うのか。

EN

yeah the book so people know it's called is it

センラ#48

それが次に聞こうと思っていたことにつながる。アルゴリズムだ。アルゴリズムの第一歩は?

EN

The fish that ate the whale.

エリック#49

要件を疑え。要件をより愚かでなくせよ。彼がよく言う言い方だ。要件はたくさんある。勝ち取った第一歩だと思う。

EN

that ate the whale. It's one of my favorite books. It's by Rich Cohen. I've read it like three times.

センラ#50

どう学んだか説明して。

EN

It's an incredible book of like high agency and deep expertise and this guy was like running a banana empire from the farms in you know Honduras or Guatemala or something. And so Elon is a like the modern manufacturing example of that. He lives lived on the line. He goes to the problems. He has a really deep understanding of not just the product but like the physics behind the product. There's a so many stories of him having this deep intuition for what the materials in a thing can do, where the threshold is and pushing engineers and designs over and over and over to like get to that failure point and find what the true like most elegant, most simple, most efficient version of the product could be.

エリック#51

賢いエンジニアの最も一般的な誤りは、存在すべきでないものを最適化することだ。要件は多くの場所から来る。組織内、チーム、法務、NASAのような設計パートナー。ロケットを打ち上げ、カプセルが宇宙ステーションにドッキングするなら、ラッチや入り方についての要件が山ほどある。特定のパッドから打ち上げるなら、音やタイミングの要件がある。最初から意味をなさない要件に合わせようとして、金と時間と努力が大量に無駄になる、と言う。まず設計要件のリストを短くし、遊べる空間を最大にする。

Maxのエッセイにもある真の話で、要件が「この特定のOmniラッチを航空宇宙会社からこの材料で買え」と言っていて超高い。その要件を疑い始め、「これができてこれができればいい」とわかると、McMaster-Carrの既製品を買って、二桁安いのに同じ仕事をした。

法的・規制の要件のときもあり、「許可に一年半かかる」と言われ、「誰かをアサインして、そのオフィスに飛んで座り、許可が出るまで帰れ。サインした紙を持って帰ってこい。なければクビだ」と言う。要件を疑う、または意味をなさない要件の免除・免除を取る方法だ。20年、50年前の規制に強制的に従わされているが、消費者を助けていない。できるだけ外して、可能な限り最良のプロダクトを、可能な限り安い価格で設計する。

EN

Can you give us some examples of that?

センラ#52

第二は?

EN

One is the thickness of the stainless steel welds on Starship, right? And so the design engineers gave one number and then he went and talked to like the guys actually doing the welding and they were kind of like we think maybe like 4 and 1/2 mm would be like getting to sketchy and he's like let's try 4 mm and 4 mm worked. Even the move to stainless steel, like most rockets previously had been made with carbon fiber. Um it's just really hard to work with and it's big and he had this intuition and knew that stainless steel at low temperatures gain strength and so once the rocket is actually up in orbit, it's stronger which is an easy thing to forget and so he's like pushing people over and over again to like use things that are cheaper, use things that are easier to work with, reduce the moving parts. My summary of Elon is is David Goggins level like intensity. He's Richard Feynman's level of like unconventional technical brilliance. And he's Napoleon's strategic genius and insane bias to action. Those three traits combined make him just incredibly singular and the volume of time that he puts in like even if you put in this amount of time to try to know your business from A to Z as without that deep technical intuition or sense of the fundamentals of the physics and the materials that you couldn't make the calls that he's making or you couldn't push on the things that he's pushing on. Of course, he's not always right. Of course, the engineers are always the ones like doing the highest volume of the real work. But as you say, like the founder is the guardian of the company's soul. And he is there to raise the bar and push people. I think he has this really keen sense of I love the line so much. Failure is essentially irrelevant unless it's catastrophic. And so he pushes these things to the breaking point, pushes the materials, pushes the designs. He wants to reach the point where he knows for sure that it's the most efficient version of the design because the mistake or the failure that reveals that information is going to pay off a million times. We're going to make 10,000 of these engines and I don't want it inefficiency in there that we're going to replicate 10,000 times. I want to make the failure. I want to fail 500 times on every single design decision so that I know that we have the most elegant thing as we scale up and ramp up.

エリック#53

削除、削除、削除。単純化。カノニカルな一文は「最良の部品は部品がないこと、最良のプロセスはプロセスがないこと」だ。Model 3の過程で部品を結合したり消したりした回数は、正確な数はわからないが——始めは1万部品超で、結合で着実に下がった。二つを付けるたびに、二つがあるだけでなく、接着・ねじ・ボルト・リベットが要るかも、金属の相互作用、組み立て、他のものが合う公差——追加部品や取り付けから来る費用・変更・リスクの数が非常に高い。単純さは信頼性と低コストの両方をくれる。それがそれだ。最良の部品は部品がない。単純さは信頼性と低コストの両方を届ける。だから人間として可能な限り削除しなければならない。

部品を結合し単純化するために極端なことをする。「削除と単純化にウルトラハードコアで行け」と言う。だからRaptorのミームでどんどん単純になる。Model 3も単純で、信頼性が高く、安く作れ、良くなった。たぶん最も有名な例は、前三分の一と後ろ三分の一を一体鋳造する決断だ。アイデアは玩具の車から来た。玩具は安く、信頼でき、速くスケールする。どう作る? この産業からアイデアを盗もう。すると、そんなに大きな鋳造機を誰も作ったことがなかった。

EN

Yeah, I think one of the things that it will surprise people is just how much uh like I I said in the Isaacson uh the episode I did in the Isaacson book, it's like half the book is just him yelling at people to simplify and to delete. And there's a maximum for this which is like genius has the fewest moving parts. And you see this with the There's that meme of like that I think that's the Raptor engine design and there's like three different ones over time and it's like this convoluted mess and then it just gets to like this simple this beautiful simplicity. You just mentioned it. We're like um I was reading about the the decision to do stainless steel instead of carbon fiber. And like, "Well, to do carbon fiber, it's more expensive. It's harder to work with. You have to build in like giant autoclave." He's like, "We can weld stainless steel in a tent."

センラ#54

ここが重要だ。これらのアイデアを組み合わせる。第一原理思考——彼が基本的に普及させて、今みんなが話すが、実際にやる人は少ない。その本で、エピソードからクリップも作った。Teslaで小さな玩具のTeslaをいじっている。Legoから学んだ話、精度の話。「なぜ車体全体を一体鋳造できない?」「そんな大きな鋳造機がない。」「鋳造機を作る会社は何社?」「世界にだいたい六、五社。」五社はNo、一社はMaybe。イーロンは「MaybeをYesとして受け取った。」生産が大幅に単純化した。

本やポッドキャストでもある話で、Teslaのプロダクション・ヘルを解こうとしていたとき、壁を壊してロボットを何百も捨てていた。変なことに気づく。「このロボットがこの部品を拾って別のロボットに渡し、それが回って別のに渡す。なぜ真ん中のやつがいる? 複雑さを足すだけだ。引っこ抜け。」

EN

Yeah.

エリック#55

それが生産システムの話で、だから「自動化」がアルゴリズムの最後のステップなんだ。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#56

昔は最初にやっていたよね。

EN

Yeah. He's They're literally building these rockets in a tent in a parking lot. You know, which is a very is a very Elon thing of like, let's do just what we have to do to make progress on the product. I want to linger on on failure for a second because I think it's a really underrated piece. I think these some of these maxims and some of these taglines that Elon uses, if you kind of put them next to each other show this pattern of he's like he's designing these organization organizations to create small failures as quickly as possible, right? So, um if you're not adding back in 10% of the things you remove, you're not taking out enough, right? So, you like fail that is that is a mandate to go create something that doesn't work and then figure out why it didn't work and just add that little bit back in so that we know it's the most efficient version of the design. When he sets deadlines, he's like, I want to pick a deadline that I'm 50% likely to make. We're going to miss half our deadlines and I'm totally fine with that. Because it means we'll be moving as fast as we possibly can and we're going to make some deadlines that nobody thought we were going to make. If we're making 100% of our deadlines, then they're way too far out because we'll always consume at least the amount of time that we give ourselves. And I think people have this inherent bias, especially like if your job is on the line or if you want to like look good in front of your peers or you want your your company to work, you don't want to be seen as failing. Like you make so many decisions engineers in general like I don't want my product to fail I don't want my product to fail and he's so much of what these cultures reinforce and these these sort of maxims reinforce is like you should be failing. He says when he hires people like if you don't if you can't tell me the four ways you … something up then you aren't the one doing the real work.

エリック#57

Teslaの当初のビジョンは全部自動化、純粋なロボットのドレッドノート自律ラインだった。「大失敗だった。設計が洗練されていなかった。製造設計がなかった。要件を疑っていなかった。部品を十分削除していなかった。他のステップを全部通るまで自動化すべきではなかった。」

何度も、ステップをちょうど逆順にやった、と言う。自動化して、速くして、最適化して、最後に要件を誰も疑っていなかったから削除される。だからこの順番で何度も何度もやる。

Starlinkの話がある。ひどい状態だった。コストは10倍、必要数の10分の1しか建てていなかった。成功から二桁ずれている。「もういい。直す。今がボトルネックだ。」Marchenko——SpaceXの超優秀な初期採用——を掴む。ロケット科学者で、衛星をやったことがない。信頼するエンジニアのチームを掴み、シアトルに飛び、Starlinkのリーダーシップ全体をクビにし、ウォールームに座る——過小評価された戦術だと思う——そしてアルゴリズムを回し始める。

衛星設計の第一原理は何か。どれだけ単純にできるか。なぜ、なぜ、なぜ、なぜこれが存在する。なぜこの二つはこんなに離れている。なぜこんなにエネルギーが要る。なぜこの製造プロセスが。数か月で二桁の飛躍を作る。この設計に出会ったことのなかったMarchenkoが、アルゴリズムを当てはめ、極めて高い設計バーに向かってマニアックな緊急性で働き、今スタンドアロン事業なら数百億ドルの価値があるプロダクトを作った。

---

EN

I was literally searching for that quote right now.

センラ#58

Foundersで「How Elon Works」というエピソードをやった。説明かイントロで言った。「伝記を400冊読んできた。今日生きている起業家に歴史上の類似を普通は見つけられる。50年、100年前の誰か。イーロンは特異だ。生きているか死んでいるかを問わず特異だ。歴史的類似を本当に見つけられない。」その場合、そして彼が繰り返す——君の本での引用の言い換えで——「アルゴリズムを何度も言うから、会議の人は俺の口から何が出るか予測できるようになった。」

特異なキャラクターが何度も繰り返す。もう少し時間をかけて、何度も考えるべきだ。あの話はいい実例だった。ここでの格言は「反復は説得的だ」。

EN

Yeah, it's a it is a great one but it it all of those kind of line up behind like if you're not engineering your organization to have these small failures, you're creating this is the antifragile idea like you're creating this sort of fragility and this inefficiency in the global thing if you don't learn to fail along the way and iterate extremely quickly towards a better product.

エリック#59

そう。

EN

a conversation with Michael Dell in one of the first episodes of this show, and he was talking about that, too. He's like, "Listen, when you're inventing a new business using new technology and new business model, there's no playbook. You can't go read a book that says, 'Here's how you do it.'" He's like, "And you can't even hire people from adjacent industries cuz they're just going to do it the way they used to do it." So, he's like, "The only way to do it is to experiment and and I think he used the word into it

センラ#60

一つのことを繰り返さなければならない。多くの創業者に繰り返される。一握りの原則を特定する。目の前のノートや本やすべてを通しても、25のアイデアじゃない。何度も使う一握りの原則だ。もう一つのミームの形、OSのように——この四つのステップを、宇宙でも車でもトンネルでも何でも当てはめられる。第三ステップへ。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#61

第三は単純化と最適化。多くのエンジニアが標準でやるが、ものが存在すると確実にわかり、要件をできるだけクリーンで短くしてからやるべきことだ。要件について本当に重要なもう一つは、一つひとつに個人の名前が付いていなければならないことだ。直接の個人説明責任をすごく重視する。「法務からの要件」なんてものはない。「法務のJanからの要件」で、彼女に行って「なぜこの要件がある? 詳しく説明して。捨てられる?」と聞ける。インターンが二年前に作って去った要件や、部署の誰も同意していない要件を何度も見つけた。そこに来てからが、トレードオフを考え最適化する普通のエンジニアリング作業だ。

EN

uh yourself. He's like, "You have a hypothesis, and then you test the hypothesis." And the point he was making is like, "So, therefore, you want mistakes. You actually want to make mistakes cuz that's the way you learn, but you want to make them small, and you don't want to make the same mistake over and over again." Which I again is like an echo of what you were just saying about Elon. I guess this ties to the part of the book that's right in front of me, where it's clear that Elon's companies he wants to use a reality as a validation tool. So, he talks about that he's like, "Getting to the truth is really important." So, he says, "In business and personal life, wishful thinking cause a lot of mistakes. You have to ask whether something is true or not. Wishful thinking is a natural human tendency." Again, these are direct quotes from Elon. "It is a challenge to tell the difference between believing a new idea and persevering or pursuing an unrealistic dream. The real test of any startup is how well it responds to adversity and adapts. When most things start out, they don't make much sense, but as long as you adapt quickly, you can make the company work. Being tenacious and super focused on the truth is extremely important. You should look for feedback from all sources."

センラ#62

Teslaのいい話がある。バッテリーパックの上に層があって、音用だと思っていたチームと、防火用だと思っていたチームがいて——

EN

The iteration towards reality as the teacher is it was another great element of Max Olson's essay. Um and Naval is super articulate about this like applying David Deutsch's ideas to company buildings. Like, your goal as a company is to discover new knowledge, which means interact with reality, and then instantiate it into a product. And this cycle of iteration and experimentation is how you check against reality, right? This is how all knowledge is created. It's it's gene mutation and selection. It's scientific hypothesis and testing. Um Um but people don't usually think about their organization in terms of like how much new knowledge is being created. How many experiments are we running? How quickly and how cheaply can the failures be created?

エリック#63

防火チームは音のバッフルだと思い、音チームは防火だと思っていた。それが確立されるとテストした。車に入れて誰も違いがわからなかった。「削除。」その時点のボトルネックだった。

EN

Here's another great line. If you have beliefs that are incompatible with the rocket getting to orbit, the rocket will not get to orbit. Physics is a harsh judge. The note to himself repeats over and over again like physics is a law, everything else is a recommendation.

センラ#64

部署がこう言い、部署がこう言い、一致していない。でもいちばん重要な部分を飛ばさないでほしい。イーロンの解決はすごく単純だ。「キャビン内がうるさくなるか? これがなければ大きいか? どうやってわかる? マイクを置け。」

EN

Another branch off of that is like physics doesn't care about your feelings. Um and so that is a line that he repeats over and over again with people who are like how can you be, you know, so quick to to judge people or to fire people or to like get the team he's like we have we have one test. We have one bar to clear. Like does the rocket fly? And how much payload can we get to orbit? Like there is one metric that we're optimizing for. And I will do what I have to do to march us towards that peace, to clear that bar. I mean this is where the Asperger's comes out. You know, like in a truly advantage way. Like he says being the need to be liked is like is huge disadvantage that so many people have. And I do not have that. He straight up says like I do not have that weakness. And Peter Thiel has an interesting observation about that she was like why are so many of the successful tech founders like seem to be somewhere on the spectrum? Like why do they all have this sort of biological advantage in dismissing the opinions of others? What does that say about like our society that that's a skill that you need to have in order to be an innovator and build something new and build a great organization?

エリック#65

テストする。

EN

So I guess that leads into the next thing I was going to ask you about which is the algorithm. Which is the first step of the algorithm algorithm is what?

センラ#66

六時間後に部品は削除され、ラインを遅らせていたものが速くなり、生産ライン全体のスループットが上がる。数百万、あるいは数千万ドルの判断。半時間の会議がTeslaの企業価値に1億ドルを足したことがある、と言う。考える高品質な一分は百万ドルの価値がある。彼がそれらの分でやる道具が実際にその効果を持つ。君の言う、世代の特異な最大の起業家。彼が最もよく語ること。たぶん有用だ。

EN

Question requirements. Make your requirements less dumb. Is is like specifically how he says it a lot. And there are so many requirements. I think it's a really that was a hard earned first step.

エリック#67

あのエピソードをたぶん半年前に作って、この会話の準備でもう一度聴いて、「毎月聴けばいい」と思った。1.5倍速なら一時間。これらのアイデアを忘れていた。反復がそれほど重要なところだ。

僕の本は全部、読んで再読されるように設計している。ハンドブックとリファレンスガイドであってほしい。何年も毎日バックパックに入ってボロボロで、犬耳とフラッグと全ページハイライトのコピーを見るのが好きだ。これらのアイデア——反復は祈りを台無しにしない、反復は説得的だ。必要なときに頭の中にあるようにインストールする作業が要る。これらの判断に直面したとき、正しい問いを立てるか正しい直感をオペレーターとして持つために。

EN

Yeah, explain what he had to go like how he learned.

センラ#68

アルゴリズムの第三ステップから来る面白い話は他にある?

EN

The the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize something that shouldn't exist. And there are many places that requirements come from, right? Sometimes they come from inside the organization, sometimes they came from a team, sometimes they came from legal, sometimes they came from a design partner like in NASA. Like if you're going to shoot up a rocket and the capsule the vehicle is going to like dock with the space station, they have all kinds of requirements about your latches and like how things go in. If you're going to launch from a specific pad, you've got requirements around sound or timing or all these things. And he he's like so much money and time and effort is wasted trying to accommodate requirements that don't make any … sense in the first place. So the first thing to do is like shorten your list of design requirements so that you've got the maximum possible space to play in. And there's so many times many stories in the in the latches like a a true one that's in Max's essay which is like the requirement said you got to buy this specific like Omni latch from an aerospace company made of these materials and it was like super expensive and they started question that requirement and they were like all right, well, it's fine as as long as it like does this and this, it's fine. And so they bought off-the-shelf parts like McMaster-Carr and they did the job just fine, which were like two orders of magnitude cheaper. There's also times when the requirement is legal or regulatory and he'll assign somebody like go it'll take a year or a half a year and a half to like get this permit and he's like assign somebody like go fly to this office and sit in this office until you get permission like sign on this sheet come back. Don't come back without a signed sheet or you're fired. Like that is a way to question the requirement or or a dismissal or a waiver of this requirement cuz it doesn't make any sense. And there's there's things that he's like we are forced to comply with so many regulations from 20 years ago, 50 years ago that just don't make any damn sense and they're not helping the consumer. So let's remove as many of them as we can so that we can design the best possible product or the for the cheapest possible price.

エリック#69

第三はいちばん面白くない、正直。要件を疑えと削除が、リフトの80%だと思う。単純化と最適化、加速、自動化は人が自然に飛びつくもので、アルゴリズムは本当に、木を切り始める前に斧を研げ、あるいは正しい木を切っているか、そもそも切るべき木か、を確実にさせるために設計されている。

EN

What's the second?

センラ#70

第四ステップは?

EN

Delete, delete, delete. Simplify. Um there's a I mean the canonical line about this is like the best part is no part, the best process is no process. And I don't know exactly the number, but the like the the number of times combining parts has happened over the course of the Model 3 or eliminating them. Like I think when he started there were over 10,000 parts. And that has come down steadily as he's combined parts because every time two things need to be attached, not only are there two things that need to be attached, but maybe they need to be glued, maybe they need to be screwed, bolted, riveted, whatever. The way the metals interact needs to happen and they need to be actually assembled and then there's like a tolerance that could change whether other things fit. It's like the number of expenses, changes, and risks that come from additional parts or additional attachments is so so so high. Simplicity gets you both reliability and low cost. That is it. The best part is no part. Simplicity delivers both reliability and low cost. And so like between those two things, you have to delete as much as humanly possible. And so he goes to great lengths to combine parts, simplify things. He says go ultra hardcore on deletion and simplification. That's how you see that like Raptor meme where things get more and more and more simple. And that's how the Model 3 has gotten simpler, more reliable, cheaper to produce, and better. And the maybe the most famous example of this is his um decision to cast entire the front third and the back third. And he got that idea from toy cars. Like toys are cheap, reliable, scale quickly. How do they make them? Like let me let me steal an idea from this industry and turned out that nobody had ever made casting machines that big. And so he like

エリック#71

加速。もっと速く。どれだけ速く動いていても、もっと速くできる。

EN

Okay, so this is an important part part because then he combines these ideas together. So we just talked about first principles thinking which you know, I think he was the one basically popularized it and now everybody talks about it. Very few people actually do it. But in that book, and I actually made a clip this from one of my episodes cuz I thought that was so interesting. Where he's like at Tesla he's just playing with like a little toy Tesla.

センラ#72

他にある?

EN

Mhm.

エリック#73

あまりない。ただ速く行け。彼には「マニアックな緊急性の感覚が我々の運営原則になる」という一文がある。

例として使うのはたぶんトンネルマシンだ。「今トンネル掘っているマシンは、今の状態でもパワーや熱の限界近くにない。回せ。できるだけ速く。」すべてが実際に自動化されたとき面白いのは、ロボットがどれだけ速く動けるかの限界は、人間が動ける限界よりずっと高い、ということだ。すべてを実際に加速すれば——AIでよく話している——人間要素を外し全部自動化できれば、超人レベルの速度でできる。

EN

And he's and he talked about like learning from Legos and like the how precise it has to be and they're like why can't we just cast entire thing under body and it was like cuz there's no casting machine that's that big. He said well how many company how many companies make casting machines I think there was like something like six in the world. Five they he was like well let's go talk to him about it. Five said no one said maybe and Elon goes I took that maybe as a yes. And it greatly simplified simplified like the production there's another story from the books and I think he talked about this on a couple of podcasts too where it's like they they had a when they were trying to solve production hell at Tesla they had to literally knock a wall they were throwing out so many robots and disposing them so fast they knocked a huge wall in the side of factory just threw out like I I forgot how many hundreds of robots cuz he found weird weird … like hey this one robot picks up this piece hands it to another robot that robot then turns around and hands it to another one. He's like why don't this robot just hand it to that robot? Why this guy in the middle on there adds complexity like just rip it out of there.

センラ#74

本での君の説明がいい。第四ステップのイーロンの記述を読む。「そのとき、そしてそのときだけ、第四ステップ、サイクルタイムを加速せよ。正しい方向に効率よく動いているなら、遅すぎる。もっと速く。常にもっと速くできる。でも他の三つを先にやるまで速くするな。後で削除すべきだったプロセスを加速するのに時間を無駄にした。存在すべきでないものを速くするのは荒唐無稽だ。自分の墓を掘っているなら、速く掘るな。掘るのをやめろ。」

EN

Yeah and that's in the production system yeah I mean he this is why automate is the last step of the algorithm.

エリック#75

これは本の「組織を設計する」セクションで、アルゴリズムを自分の会社自体に当てはめるのが本当に過小評価されていると感じる。設計者、エンジニア、製造エンジニアの距離を最小化し、会社からできるだけ多くを消す。会社を速く動かす。会社と構造自体の要件を疑う。組織の欠陥がプロダクトに見える、と言う。バッテリーチームがバッテリー用の箱を建て、車のシャーシがすぐ上にあると、蓋付きの完全なバッテリーを設計するのが理にかなって見える。でも上に車があるならバッテリーケースに蓋は実際には要らない。箱の中の箱になる。最も効率的なのは、部品や責任や材料を複製しないよう、全員が十分に相互作用することだ。個別のポケットに最適化判断を任せすぎると、自分の小さなユニットには最適でも、より広いシステムの一部としてのユニットには最適でない。バラバラの金属が集まらなければならなかったり、全体プロダクトとして最適でない狂った設計判断が生まれたりする。

EN

Cuz he did used to do that first right?

センラ#76

彼はその逆を象牙塔エンジニアリングと呼ぶ。「プロダクトやプロセスを設計して壁の向こうに投げ、お前がエンジニアして製造しろ。」「だめだ。エンジニアと製造は設計者に電話して『なぜこうした?』と聞けるようにしなければならない。」

EN

Yeah he his original vision for Tesla is like we're going to automate everything this is going to be like a pure robot you know dreadnought autonomous line and he's like that was a huge mistake we didn't we didn't have it refined but we we didn't have the design refined we didn't have the manufacturing design we hadn't questioned the requirements we hadn't deleted enough parts we should not have automated until all of these other steps have been gone through. He said there's many times where he did every step in exactly reverse order something was like automated and then tried to done faster and then optimized and then ended up getting deleted because nobody had questioned the requirements. That's why we do these things in this order over and over and over and over again and well there's a great story of taking Starlink was like a a mess right? It was 10x were and they were building 1/10 of how many they needed. So, like two orders of magnitude off success. He's He's like, "I've had it. I'm fixing this. This is now the bottleneck." He grabs uh Marchenko, so which is one of his like super talented early hires from SpaceX. This is a rocket scientist. This is not a guy who's ever worked on satellites. He grabs a team that of engineers that he trusts. They fly up to Seattle. They fire the entire Starship leadership uh our Starlink leadership team. And they sit down in a war room, which I think is an underrated like tactic. And they start running the algorithm. What is the first principles of like satellite design? How simple can we make this thing? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why does this exist? Why are these two things so far apart? Why do we need this much energy? Why do we need this manufacturing process? And over the course of like a few months, they make this two order of magnitude leap. Like Marchenko who had never encountered this design before, but just by applying the algorithm and working with maniacal urgency towards this extremely high design bar, they created this product that's now, you know, if it was a standalone business, it'd be worth tens of billions of dollars.

エリック#77

反復速度と、修正・特定できる失敗の数に戻る。Raptor生産で、チーム全員に机をRaptor生産ラインに移させた。設計や作業をしているあいだに、エンジンがすぐ隣で製造されるのを見て対話する。原子を動かしている人とプロダクトを設計している人のあいだのフィードバック帯域が超高い。伝統的航空宇宙は、ファイルを設計して切り出され、請負に行き、下請けに委任され、実際に金属を切ったり材料に触ったりする人に会うまで五社下まで行く、と言う。それから全部上に戻り、みんなが複雑さ・混乱・オーバーヘッド・コスト・利益を足す。SpaceXが桁違いに効率的でコスト効果が高い理由の一部だ。設計を極めて速く反復して不要なものを全部消している事実の前に、すでにそうだ。

EN

Deel is the best company in the world at building infrastructure for global hiring. Deel will help your business hire, pay, and manage any worker anywhere in the world. Deel is one platform for payroll, HR, benefits, and device management across 150 countries. Deel gets you everything you need to run a high-performing global workforce on a single AI native platform. From the first offer to final off-boarding, Deel handles the complexity so you can stay focused on your business. The best founders and operators in the world have one thing in common. They control as much of their business as possible. The founders of Deel do exactly this. When you use Deel, you aren't using a third-party payroll processor or a messy network of in-country providers. Deel built and owns their own rails. That means faster speed, better service, and total accountability. Deel has built AI teammates that take action. Most HR AI stops at chat. Deel puts AI inside the workflows themselves, so it can run real work across hiring, payroll, mobility, IT support, and reporting grounded in compliance-vetted knowledge. Deel AI takes action to help teams move faster without adding headcount. Deel is trusted by over 40,000 businesses. Learn how they can help your business today by going to deel.com. That is d e e l dot com. I did this episode of Founders called how Elon works. And I think in the description maybe in the intro I was like, "Listen, I can usually I've read 400 of these … biographies. Like, I can usually find a historical analogy to an entrepreneur living today where like that person was very similar to this person maybe it was 50 years ago 100 years ago. I think Elon's singular and I think I said he was like singular living or dead. I can't really find a historical analogy to but it's like if that's the case and he repeats he says this is your quote we're not it's a paraphrase of a quote from Elon in that book where he's just like "I would say the algorithm so much and I repeat it so many times that people in the meeting would start to be able to predict what's coming out of my goddamn mouth."

センラ#78

第五ステップ。四つと言い間違えた。この男で10エピソードやっているのに。第五へ。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#79

第五は自動化。聖杯だが、正しいものを自動化していると確実にしろ。自動化自体——自動化を作るプロセス——は高く、適応が難しい。はい、自動化すべきだが、アルゴリズムの他のステップを厳格に全部通したあとだけ。

EN

So why don't we think about this guy doesn't have he's a singular character in the the history of entrepreneurship and he's repeats this over and over again. Like maybe we should spend a little bit more time and we should think about this over and over again to the point that that that was a great illustration of the story. Um I think the the the maxim here is like repetition is persuasive.

センラ#80

君が今言ったことは、キャリア全体を貫く巨大なテーマだと思う。常にすべてをコントロールしたい。

EN

Yes.

エリック#81

そう。

EN

So like you have to repeat one thing that's that's that is that is recurring throughout a lot of these founders like they have a they identify handful of principles. If we go through all the notes all the books everything we have in front of us it's not 25 ideas. He's got a handful of principles that he uses over and over and over again. And I love this idea that he built like this almost like this it's almost like another form of a meme. It's like this operating system where these these four steps and we can apply it in space in cars in tunnels and everything else. Let's go to step number three.

センラ#82

なぜそれがそんなに重要か話せる?

EN

Step number three is simplify and optimize, um, which is I think that's what most engineers just like do as a standard, um, but that is the thing that like you should only do after you know for sure that the thing exists and you know for sure you've got your requirements as clean and short as you possibly can. The other thing that's actually really important about the requirements is that a single individual's name has to be attached to every one of them. He's huge on direct individual accountability. And so there's no such thing as like a requirement from legal. There's like a requirement from Jan in legal so that you can go ask her and be like, "Why does this requirement exist? Please explain it very thoroughly. Can we throw it out?" etc., right? And so so many times he found requirements that were like created by an intern who left the company two years ago or a department where nobody in the department actually agrees with the requirement. Um, so once you get there it's like the the very normal engineering work of like let's figure out the trade-offs. Let's optimize this thing.

エリック#83

Teslaの初期に厳しい経験があった。この会社の責任や権力を共有すること、始まりはmessyだった。メイン投資家で会長だったが実際のCEOではなく、プロダクトに深く関わり、電気自動車のビジョンのバーに達する結果を出そうと多くの時間を使った。長期ではうまくいかず、会社は厳しい道に向かい、必要な進捗を出せていなかった。TeslaのCEOとして踏み込むことへの躊躇を語る。「やらなければ会社は死んでいた。金のほとんどを出した。プロダクトにできる限り関わった。でもうまくいくならコントロールを取り、オールインしなきゃいけない。」

EN

Yeah, there's a great, um, story from Tesla where you had the battery pack and then they had something like like a layer on top of it. This is for sound and one per per one part of Tesla thought it was for like fire prevention, am I remembering this correctly?

センラ#84

たぶんLotusのシャーシを使っていた頃のミスについても語っていた。「白紙から設計すべきだった。新しいことをやるなら常に白紙からの方がいい。」

EN

Yeah, like the fire prevention team thought it was for sound baffling and the sound team thought it was for fire protection. Um, and like once that was established, they actually they tested it. They put them like in the car and like nobody could tell the difference. They're like, "Delete." Okay, so but it was the bottleneck at that particular time.

エリック#85

本当にいい教訓で、大きなテーマのひとつだ。技術の強い形を行け。前にあったものを適応しようとするな。限界で考え、第一原理に行き、過去の制約を完全に残す真の飛躍の技術を建てろ。過去の設計だけでなく、過去のサプライチェーン全体。業界の既存サプライヤーに頼っていても、本当に白紙から始めれば可能な仕方で完全にイノベートするのは難しい。あらゆる要件を疑う。最大理想の可能なプロダクトというプラトン的限界から始め、そこから逆算する。どれだけ近づけるか。分野に存在するものより10%良く、20%良く、というアナロジーから始めない。完璧はどんな姿か。絶対的理想は何か。どれだけ近づけるか。できない理由を誰かが言ったら、なぜを問い始め、ドリルダウンし、要件を疑い、前提を押せ。

EN

But like like again, it's like this department said this and this department said that. They're not agreeing. But then I think not to skip over this part cuz I think it's the most important part.

センラ#86

この点をハンマーで叩くのは大事だ。起業家の歴史を読めば、みんな同じ場所に並ぶ。できるだけ垂直統合する。事業、原材料、すべてをできるだけコントロールする。気づかずにはいられなかったのは、自動車産業の始まり方がそれだということだ。ヘンリー・フォードは部品のほとんどを自分で作った。明らかに手作業で、車の量産を理解する前だ。それがメインのアイデアだった。自動車サプライチェーンはなかった。やってコントロールする。彼もコントロールに執着した。1919年に投資家を買い取り、フォード・モーターの100%を所有した。今日の200億〜400億ドル規模の会社を100%持つようなものだ。鉄道を買った。Model Tとすべての車に入る設計と部品を全部コントロールするだけでなく、部品が届く物流もコントロールしたい。

イーロンについて面白いのは、当時のアメリカ自動車産業のトレンド——下請け下請け下請け——に逆らい、「昔のやり方に戻る」と言ったことだ。重要な理由は、コントロールだけでなく、コスト効率の高いプロダクトの作り方だ。下請けの下請けだと——当時はまだイディオット・インデックスと呼んでいなかったが——ロケットのとき、コストの98%は材料から来ていないと気づいた。「金はどこに行っている? ああ、この請負が下請けを雇い、その下請けがまた下請けを雇い、金属を曲げる人に辿り着くまでに何段もある。」

EN

Elon's solution was very like simple. It's like, "Well, does it reduce the inside the cabin? Is it louder if this thing's not here? How are we going to figure that out?" Well, let's just put a … microphone.

エリック#87

そこに重要なメタがある。彼はまったく違うビジョンとインセンティブのセットを持っている。これまでの航空宇宙産業は基本的に政府のコストプラス契約で支えられてきた。インセンティブは何か。できるだけ金を使うこと。予算のパーセンテージで儲ける。成功へのインセンティブはあるかもしれないが、経済的に成功するインセンティブはないし、当初の締め切りで成功するインセンティブもないかもしれない。

イーロンは契約を出している側に行き、「アウトカムベースの契約が欲しい。コストを下げるインセンティブが欲しい。締め切りを守るインセンティブが欲しい」と言った。低コストで競争したかった。前代未聞のことをやっているという話のすべてにおいて、コストを下げるから前代未聞のことをやれている。コストを下げるのは、ビジョンが「できるだけ金を稼ぐ」じゃないからだ。可能な限り儲かる航空宇宙会社を始めることじゃない。火星に連れて行くことだ。地球からペイロードを出すコストをできるだけ下げることだ。できるだけ低コストのシステムを建てるインセンティブが欲しい。それをやって、これらの契約を勝ち始め、実際のアウトカムベースのものを勝ち始めた。ちなみに政府にも納税者にも良い。凡人の仕事やわずかに良い仕事でXを得られるとわかっていても、「リスクを取りたい。船を燃やしたい。背中を壁に付けたい。誰も越えたことのない閾値をクリアしなければならないと知りたい。チームにそれを伝えたい。それが、みんなが狂っていると思う目標——火星——を実際に達成する方法だからだ。」人間のエンジニアリングシステムで桁違いの効率飛躍を作る。まったく違うアプローチで、すべてはSFの夢と目的駆動の性質に遡る。

Teslaも同じだ。「儲かる電気自動車会社を作りたい」とは言わなかった。「できるだけ多くの人間が電気自動車に乗る。それが気候変動に穴を開ける方法だ。」すべての判断は「電気自動車を作りながら利益を最大化するには?」ではない。「できるだけ多くの人に電気自動車を乗せるには? できるだけ安く。下げなければならない。プロダクトを単純化しなければならない。製造のスケールが本当に低い価格を支えるよう、巨大なボリュームが要る。」原則駆動の判断を、非常に長期の視点から作り続ける。視点がズームアウトしすぎて共感しにくく、業界の通説に対して狂っていて愚かで先見的で逆効果に見えることをし続けるが、彼らがこうするから自分も、という感覚からでも、局所的に戦略最適、という感覚からでもない。巨大なミッションに取り組んでおり、その巨大なミッションに奉仕するために可能なあらゆる判断をする。だから戦略的に差別化されている。誰も狙っていない標的を狙うパラドックスに戻る。まったく違うシステムのセットにインセンティブづけられ、それらのインセンティブがすべての判断を駆動する。だからTeslaとSpaceXはどちらも、誰もやっていないことをやる同じダイナミクスを持つ。

EN

Yeah. And we'll test it.

センラ#88

話を聞いて二つ浮かぶ。一つは、複雑なものを単純に蒸留して伝える能力に、人は重く投資し、練習すべきだということ。イーロンは世界でいちばん上手い人の一人かもしれない。二つ目は、すべてを通じてのテーマで、SpaceXでいちばん顕著だと思うが、コストコントロールを執着にすること——それは組織が始まってから接ぎ木するのか?

組織が始まる前からあった。ロシアのICBMはなぜこんなに高い、という考えで、第一原理思考を始める。みんな知っている話だ。でも別の言い方がずっと記憶に残る。本にもある。「なぜロシアだけがコスト効率の良いロケットを作れる国なのか。ロシアの車に乗る? ロシアの家電を使う? この国が最もコスト効率の良い打ち上げ機を作る方法を見つけたはずがない。アメリカはかなり競争的な場所だ。最もコスト効率の良い打ち上げ機を持つべきだ。」今は圧倒的に支配している。第一原理で部品を分解して商品取引所で価格を見た、と言うこともできるし、「なぜロシア車に乗っていない?」と言うこともできる。

EN

We'll test it. And six hours later the part is deleted and like this whole thing that was slowing down, you know, they they pulled more robots off the line and it sped up and that increased the throughput of the entire production line. Then it was a millions, maybe tens of millions of dollars worth of decision. Like he he says there are times when a single half hour meeting has added a hundred million dollars to the enterprise value of Tesla. Every single minute of thinking is like worth a million dollars. A high quality minute of thinking. And these tools are the things that he does in those minutes that actually have that kind of effect, which is to your point of like, this is a singular greatest entrepreneur of our generation. This is the thing that he talks about most often. Maybe it's useful.

エリック#89

そう。家の食洗機はロシア製? 冷蔵庫は?

EN

Well, I I made that episode probably like six months and I was listening to it again to prepare for this conversation with you and I'm like, I should listen to this every month. Like, it's just like it's an hour and a half you can listen at 1.5 it's an hour if you're at 1.5 x speed or whatever it is. It's like, oh, I forgot like some of these ideas and I think that's where the repetition is so important.

センラ#90

いや。

EN

Yeah, I mean, that's why I I really design all my books to be read and reread. Like, I want them to be handbooks and reference guides and I love when I see like a just a beat to … copy that's been in and out of somebody's backpack like every day for years and is like dog-eared and flagged and all the highlight on every page. Like, these ideas repetition doesn't spoil the prayer, repetition is persuasive. Like, you have to work to install these ideas in your head so that they're there when you need them. So that you ask the right question or have the right instinct as an operator when you're confronted with one of these decisions.

エリック#91

アメリカはすごいものを作り、安く作る。この領域でも同じことができないはずがない。答えは、ここ数十年、政府契約駆動の寡占だったからだ。NASAは素晴らしく先駆的だったが、このプロジェクトに本当に自分を当てはめていなかった。忘れられがちなのは、SpaceXの当初のビジョンは打ち上げ会社を始めることではなかった、ということだ。イーロンの当初の目標はNASAの予算を増やすことで、既存ロケット技術で火星に温室を撃ち、赤い惑星に小さな植物——別の惑星に生命が移った初めて——の写真をすべての紙面の一面に載せ、NASA予算を増やし探索と宇宙への関心の波を起こす、というフィランソロピー・ミッションに1億ドルを燃やす覚悟だった。それをやろうとして、宇宙打ち上げ市場がこんなに高く革新がなく前に進んでいなかったと発見し、SpaceXを始める機会を発見した。市場を前に動かすのは実際これだ、と。その進捗の副産物としてほぼ偶然にStarlinkに入り、今は軌道上ソーラーコンピューティングなどへ動いている。

EN

Are there any other interesting stories that you can think of that come from the third step of the algorithm?

センラ#92

Starlinkの話は面白い。本にも、僕らが参照し続けているMax Olsonのエッセイにもある。フロンティアにいないなら——イーロンは明らかに自分が動く領域のフロンティアで運営したい。ミッションを前に進めるだけでなく、実際のフロンティアにいなければ見えない機会が解錠される。Starlink星座にだいたい9000機、増え続けている。SpaceX創業時は年に2、4打ち上げだったのが、今はだいたい二日に一回。

EN

I think the third step is the least interesting, honestly. Um, I think the like question requirements and delete are probably 80% of the lift. I think the simplify and optimize, the accelerate and the automate are the things that people leap to naturally and the algorithm is really designed to get them to, you know, sharpen the axe before they start chopping down the tree or be sure to chopping down the right tree. Um, be sure to chopping down the tree is the right next step at all, anyway.

エリック#93

誘発需要の概念だ。市場の大きさは常に同じだと思われがちだが、「コストを二桁下げれば、急に妥当になるユースケースがたくさんある。」Maxがエッセイで書くように、ロケットの量産に達することはSpaceX戦略の核心の一部だ。固定費をカバーするには反復とボリュームが要る。ボリュームを駆動する新しいユースケースを考える。毎年の新しい打ち上げ能力で何をするか。いちばん明白な最初はStarlink。次はソーラーコンピュート、ダイソン球、月基地——いろんな狂ったことが起きる。Sカーブのスタックが続く。

イーロンに多くの功績があるのは、月桂冠に座らなかったことだ。Falcon 9に座って何十年も現金を掻き集められた。他にできる人はいないし、超儲かる事業だ。でも攻撃的だ。それが明らかになり始めた頃、たぶんそれ以前から、すでにStarshipにいた。目的駆動に戻る——我々は多惑星になるために行く。これがその事業と技術とチームだ。

---

EN

What's step four in the algorithm?

センラ#94

本のサブタイトルがすごく重要だと思う。「Elon Musk's most useful ideas in his own words」。友人に何を読んでいるか説明するとき、「200ページ、ただイーロンが直接君に話しかけてくる200ページだ」と言った。通しで読んでもいいし、ある章に飛んでもいい。机に置いて数日ごとに数ページ読むのはキャリアの道具として最高だ。

EN

Accelerate. Go faster. However fast you're going, you can go faster.

エリック#95

対話として組んである。イーロン・マスクとディナーしている感じになってほしい。

EN

Is there anything else to it?

センラ#96

またこのアイデアをハンマーで叩く。成功した起業家のほとんどと同じ結論に達した——できるだけ垂直統合し、事業をできるだけコントロールする。彼にとって哲学的なものではなく、「他の会社はクソ遅すぎる」だった。

時間について語るセクションが本当に面白かった。君を呼んだ理由、この会話をしたかった理由は——イーロンについて見つけられる本は全部読み、SpaceXの歴史も数えきれない本を読み、この男で10エピソードやったのに、君の本にはどこにもなかったものがあった。徹底さだと思う。いくつか読んで投げて、考えがあれば聞きたい。

すでに触れた。「マニアックな緊急性の感覚が我々の運営原則だ。」時間を無駄にするな。大きな会議は、全員に価値があると確実でない限りやめろ。確実なら短くしろ。極めて緊急の案件でなければ、頻繁な会議もやめろ。緊急案件が解決したら、会議頻度は急速に下がるべきだ——NASAの人がSpaceXで見た観察を思い出す。問題が出るとフラッシュモブ。フラッシュモブは永遠にそこにいない。なぜ定期会議を続ける? 価値を足していないと明らかになったら会議から出るかコールから降りろ。去るのは無礼じゃない。他人を留まらせて時間を無駄にさせるのが無礼だ。本で二重線を引いた箇所のひとつだ。「唯一の真の通貨は時間だ。」

速度は攻撃でも防御でもある、という話。他の誰も語っていない、すごく面白い話だ。「最良の攻撃と防御は速度だ。SR-71ブラックバードは加速以外ほぼ防御がない軍用機だ。一度も撃墜されなかった。3000発以上のミサイルが撃たれ、一発も当たらなかった。やったのは速くなることだけ。競争要因としての速度の力は過小評価されている。」

EN

Not really.

エリック#97

TeslaとSpaceXの核心的優位は、新しい技術をどれだけ速く反復・設計するかだと思う。Teslaの特許をオープンソースにした。「どうぞコピーして。幸運を。」オープンソースしたものを生産している頃には、5〜10年先にいる。軍事史から学んだことも本にたくさんある。「近代のほとんどの戦争、多くの戦争で決定的要因は技術革新の速度だ。戦術でも規模でもなく、技術の非対称。戦争が長いほど、反復速度が重要になる。どこから始めたかではなく、新しいものをどれだけ速く開発しているか。」

EN

So,

センラ#98

続く。「二倍の速度で動く工場は、実質もう一つの工場に等しい。」大好きだ。「各社で何をするかのトリアージを常に走らせている。常に、できる最も有用なことは何かと考えている。」槍の穂先ミームに戻る。制約要因は何か。飛行機に乗って、制約があるところへ行き、解決するまで出ない。速度のもう一つの形だ。

EN

[laughter]

エリック#99

ボトルネックを特定する速度、そこに行き、攻撃し、解決する速度。その各ステップが速度を上げ、報われる。小さな話だが好きなのは、普通の会社なら二週間かかることを一時間でやる例だ。機械工を面接して、20〜30分。雇いたい。いくら取るか聞き、その場で値切り、合意。隣にオファー用紙を持った人が立っている。「空欄を埋めろ。」サインして、仕事開始。

EN

just

センラ#100

当日。

EN

go faster. He has that line where we uh What do you say? A maniacal sense of urgency is going to be our operating principle.

エリック#101

当日。しかも土曜の午後6時頃。時間の使い方の記述は、全部使う、即座に、だ。それが重要な洞察だ。彼だけでなくこれらの会社がこんなに速く動く理由だ。戦術の話が多い——速い、第一原理、ボトルネック——でもこれらを組み合わせると、Charlie Mungerのロリパルーザだ。10%に10%に10%じゃない。いちばん重要なことにマニアックな強度で取り組み、週40時間ではなく100時間やれば、他の誰かの生産性を桁違いに超える。何十年もそれをやっている。だからこんなに先にいる。賢い。激しい。でも超人じゃない。競合より桁違いに賢いわけじゃない。働き方と方法とマインドセットが、桁違いに先に置く。

EN

Yeah. But like the example here I would use is probably going to the tunneling machines. He's like, "If you want to accelerate tunnel like the machines that are currently tunneling, even in state they are tunneling are nowhere near their power or thermal limits. So, just like crank them up. Go put them make them go as fast as they can." Like can the ro- The interesting thing about when everything is actually automated is like how fast can the robots move is a way higher limit on that than how fast can humans move. And so, if you actually do accelerate everything, he's been talking about this a bunch with AI. Like if you can remove the human human element and then you can automate everything, you can do it to a degree that is like superhuman level of speed.

センラ#102

ロリパルーザと表現するのが好きだ。伝えようとしているのはそれだ。イーロンについてのポッドキャスト、君との会話、この本——アイデアを全部使え。組み合わさり、何にでも当てはめられる。僕はロケットを建てていない。収録直前にも、ショーでさえ制約要因を見つける、というアイデアがある。パートナーのRobと、速くしたい、生産を上げたい。ボトルネックは二つ。両方を攻撃している。収録前に別のチームメンバーに「一つ気に入らない。何度もドリルダウンする必要がある」と言っていた。何にでも使える。

本に初めて読んだものがある。Ashley Vanceが2013年頃に書いたイーロン伝。

EN

You have a great way to describe this in the book. I'm just going to read This is Elon's description of step four from the book, which I love. And so, he's talking, he's like, "Then and only then, step four, accelerate cycle time. Once you're moving in the right direction and moving efficiently, you're moving too slow. Go faster. You can always make things go faster. But do not go faster until you've worked on the other three things first. I mistakenly spent a lot of time accelerating processes that I later realized should have been deleted. Speeding" This is hilarious. "Speeding up something that shouldn't exist is absurd. If you're digging your grave, don't dig it faster. Stop digging."

エリック#103

そう。

EN

Yeah. This is in the designing the organization section of the book, and I feel like it is really underrated that he applies the algorithm to his own companies. Like he minimizes the distance between like the designers, the engineers, the manufacturing engineers, and gets rid of as much stuff in his companies as he possibly can. He makes the companies go faster. He questions the requirements of of the the companies and the structure themselves. And you can He talks about it, you can see the flaws in the organization in the product. So, if there's a a battery team building a box for the battery, but a chassis in the car right above it, like they'll put a lid on the battery because it makes sense to design a complete battery with a lid with a car on top of it. So you don't actually need a lid on the battery case. You end up with like a box in a box where the most efficient thing to do is like have enough interactions between all those people that you are not duplicating parts or responsibilities or materials. Because if you allow individual pockets to make too many optimization decisions, they'll optimize for their own tiny unit, but not how the unit exists in part of the broader system. You'll have like a bunch of disparate metals that have to come together or a bunch of insane design decisions that don't make the full system optimal as a whole product.

センラ#104

最初のものだ。2016年のFoundersの最初のエピソードにした。

EN

Yeah, he talks about the opposite of that. I think he calls it ivory tower engineering.

エリック#105

みんな聴くべきだ。Davidは嫌うだろう。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#106

やめて。速度と時間とプロダクトと会社の話をしているが、彼はそれを、君が言った奇妙な長期視点にも当てはめる。それがないと、彼の判断は理解できない。この段落を読んだとき、こう表現した——これがイーロンが金について考えるやり方だ。どこにも聞いたことがなかった。

「SpaceX初期、チームに言った。やることすべてがバーンレートの関数だ。一日10万ドル燃やしている。同じように、10年後の売上は一日1000万ドルと見込んでいた。目標達成が一日遅れるたび、その売上を逃す一日だ。」Ashley Vanceの本の話で、「イーロンがわからない。2万5000ドルの部品に金を出してくれと言ったらNo。イディオット・インデックスで2000ドルで作れるはずだ、と。なのにハワイに部品を届けるためにジェットを使わせ、6万ドルのジェット燃料を燃やす。労働一日を節約するためだ。」60k使うのは理にかなう。10年後のその日は1000万だから。

EN

He's like, I'm going to design a product a process. I'm going to throw it over the wall and you can engineer a manufacturer. And he's like, no, you have to be able to the engineer and the manufacturer should be able to call a designer like, why did you do it this way?

エリック#107

チーム全体とインフラの価値を解錠する。僕の見方でイーロンについて過小評価されているのは、ドメイン横断の超流暢さだ。単純な例だが、学部で物理と経済の両方を学んだ。事業を動かし、事実上すべての会社でプロダクト責任者でもある。極めて広い多変量のトレードオフを見ていて、君の言うズームアウトした機会費用と複利を深く理解している。10年後に事業がどこにありうるか、今日のボトルネックは何か、金と設備と時間と注意のバーンレートは何か、今日だけでなく潜在的将来価値として何が解錠されるか。マニアックな緊急性の強力な源だと思う。常に頭に火がついている。一日のあらゆる時間が何十億ドルもかかっている。もっと強度高く働け、速く動けるたびに報酬は上がる。

EN

Yeah, going back to the iteration speed and the number of failures that you can correct and identify. Um you know, moving the the Raptor production. He had their whole team move their desks to the Raptor production line. So they're as they're like sitting there designing or working on it, whatever they're working on, they're like watching the machine, the engine get manufactured like right next to them. And they're like dialoguing. This is like the feedback, the bandwidth between the people actually moving the atoms and the people designing the product are super super super high. I mean, he I think he talks about traditional aerospace is like designing a file that then gets parted out, that gets goes to some contractors and those subcontractors delegated to some contractors and you have to go five companies down before you can find a guy who's actually like cutting metal or touching the material. And then it kind of goes all the way back up and everybody's adding like complexity and confusion and overhead and cost and profit. And that's part of the reason why SpaceX is able to do something that's like orders of magnitude more efficient and cost effective. Um and that's before you even get to the fact that they're like iterating so quickly on the design that they're removing all this unnecessary stuff.

センラ#108

本のページをランダムに開いたが、君が言っていることに通じる。読む前に——君が参照していたのは、財務とエンジニアリングが同じ頭の中にある、という話だ。

EN

All right, let's go to step five. I think I mistakenly said there's four steps. I've done 10 episodes on this guy. You'd notice by now. So, let's go to step five.

エリック#109

同じ脳だ。

EN

Step five is automate. It is the holy grail, but you want to be sure you're automating the right thing cuz automation itself, the process of creating the automation, is expensive um and difficult to adapt. So, yes, things should be automated, but then it should only be automated after you've rigorously applied the other steps of the algorithm all the way through.

センラ#110

ほとんどの会社では分かれている。彼では一つ。何かを作りたい、コストや潜在成長を知りたい——その議論は自分の中で起きる。だから速く動ける。一つの頭の中で決断が起きる。歴史の偉大な創業者で、そういう単独意思決定者はどれだけいる?

EN

You just mentioned something I think is a huge like theme that runs throughout like his entire career that he wants to control everything always.

エリック#111

委員会が偉大なものを作る例は多くない。実は『Atlas Shrugged』を初めて読んでいて、エピソードにするかも。冒頭にイーロン的な人物がいて、兄弟のパートナーが正反対で、彼女が決断した。「どう決めた?」「決めただけ。」「でも取締役会や他の人に確認しなきゃ。」「いや、決断するだけだ。」

本を読めばパターンとして見える。責任のパターンがあり、僕の本にも「内面化された責任」という章がある。『Atlas Shrugged』のヒーローたちは、他の人が誰かに決断を押しつけるなかで、「俺が責任を持つ。俺がこの決断をする。正しかろうが間違っていようが、後で俺に突きつけろ」と言う。イーロンが打ち上げ管制室でやるのを聞く。リスク要因を特定した、ゴーかノーゴーか。数千万ドルのロケットと公衆の目の前で、物理、リスク、経済、市場価値、会社の速度、次の打ち上げ窓を計算し、「リスクを取れ。ロケットを打ち上げろ。行く」と言う。何度も何度も、彼が単独で責任を負う決断だ。だからこれらの教訓は貴重だ。誰がこの種の経験を生き、これらの教訓を研いで届けてくれる?

EN

Yes.

センラ#112

戻って、イーロンが金について考えるこのアイデアを伸ばす。「Teslaは、考える高品質な一分が百万ドルのインパクトを持つところまで来ている。」前にも参照した。狂っている。イーロンの言葉だ。「週20億ドルの売上なら、だいたい一日3億、週7日。半時間の会議が会社の財務結果を1億ドル改善した事例が何度もある。」

EN

Can you talk about like why that is so important?

エリック#113

地球上で最もレバレッジの高い男だ。何万人ものエンジニア、何十億の資本、何十億のCapEx、工場。でも「だから眠れにくい。常にやるべき重要なことがある」と言う。常にトリアージを走らせ、できる最も重要なことは何か。だからスケジュールを持たない。ジェットは、やるべき最も重要なことがどこであれ世界中を飛ぶ彼だ。

EN

Well, he had a tough experience in the early days of Tesla. I think like sharing responsibility or power over this over this company and the beginning of Tesla was kind of a messy experience. Like he was the main investor and chairman, but he wasn't actually CEO, but he spent so much time like getting deeply involved in the product like trying to drive a good outcome there that reached the bar that he had for his vision for electric cars that it just didn't really work in the long term and the company was heading down this this tough path and wasn't really making the kind of progress that it needed to. And so, he talks about his like reluctance to step in as CEO of Tesla. He's like, "If I didn't do that, the company would have died. I provided most of the money. I've been as involved as you could be I in creating the actual like contributing to the product, but eventually he's like, "If this is going to work, I've got to I've got to take control of it and I've got to go all in on it."

センラ#114

アイザックソンの本に、当時Grimesとデートしていて、彼女がインタビューで「ベッドで彼を捕まえた。眠っている。目が覚めると、考える人のポーズで座っている。寝るときも考える人のポーズ。起きてもまだ考える人のポーズ」と言う話がある。

EN

Yeah, he talked about the mistake of trying to maybe cuz originally they used like the Lotus, right? The Lotus chassis, I think it was what it was. He's like, "We should just design this from a blank sheet of paper. It's always better if you're going to do something new. Like just design from a blank sheet of paper."

エリック#115

パーティーに行く服装をして「ちょっとこれを見てくる」と言い、タキシードのままロケットの下で夜を過ごす話が何時間分もある。

EN

It is a really good lesson and and actually a big uh theme of his is like go for the strong form of the technology. Don't try to adapt what came before. Try to like think in limits, go to first principles, and build like a a true leap in technology that totally leaves behind the constraints of of the past. Not just the past sort of designs, but the past entire supply chain. Like even if you were counting on the existing suppliers in the industry, it's going to be really tough to like fully innovate in the way that is possible if you start with a truly clean sheet of paper. You question every requirement. You start with like the platonic limit of like what is the maximum ideal possible product? And then work backwards from that. How do how close can we get to that? Not start with an analogy of like how can we be 10% better than what exists in the field? Like we can do 20% better. Like what does perfection look like? What is the absolute ideal? And how close can we get to that? And if anybody gives you a reason why you can't do that, start asking why. Start drilling down. Start questioning requirements. Start pushing on those assumptions.

センラ#116

SpaceX初期の歴史で、クリスマスパーティーに来て高級革靴で、「遅くまで外にいる。ツアーで——今、高級靴がダメになった。文字どおりロケットを建てる手伝いをしているから。」

ランダムな引用。「直列依存を避けよ。」

EN

Well, I think it's important to like hammer on this point though. Because it's obvious if you read like if you just study history of these entrepreneurs, like they're all they all line up at the same place. It's like as vertically integrated as possible. Yeah. They're going to control as much of their business, their raw materials, and everything. And what I couldn't help but notice is this is how the car industry started. Like Henry Ford, they made almost all their parts themselves. Obviously they were making it by hand. This is before he figured out how to mass produce a a car. And that was like his his main idea. There was no auto

エリック#117

いちばん明白なのは、SpaceXとTeslaを同時に始める誰か、だ。狂っている。でもどちらも重要なので、両方ベストを尽くす。PayPalの話はもう少し一般化できる。規制の箱をチェックし、パートナーシップ統合を回し、プロダクトを建てる必要がある。普通は一つずつやり、規制クリアがわからないうちにプロダクトを建てる時間を無駄にしたくないから三年ものになる。彼は「全部並列でやる。最大リスク、最小タイムライン。全部並列で一年でローンチ。用意、スタート」と攻める。

ウォーレン・バフェットの「九人の女性を妊娠させて一か月で赤ん坊はできない」——全体タイムラインを最小化するために何を直列でやるか、という感覚。追加リスクがつき、高くつく。でも根本通貨である時間が最も価値あるものなら、実際にやるべきことだ。これらの会社のペース、速度が高い大きな理由の一部だと思う。偉大な起業家は何度も、速度がどれだけ過小評価されているかを語る。イーロンも、会社のペースだけでなくチーム自体について語る。

チームをベクトル和として語る。各従業員を矢印として想像する。矢印の大きさは従業員の質の高さ、長さはどれだけ速く動いているか。イーロンの仕事は全部を同じものに揃えること。チームの良さ、揃い方、働き方——それがチームのベクトル和で、最終的に会社の進捗と成功を決める。

EN

supply chain.

センラ#118

いくつか持ち出す。時間を無駄にしないことを常にハンマーで叩いているが、イーロンに捧げたエピソードで九人の女性を妊娠させる話を出したのは気づかずにはいられない。

EN

Oh, so then you you start doing it and then you have control. He's also obsessed with control. He wound up buying out his investors I think in 1919 Henry Ford owned 100 by 1919 he owned 100% of Ford Motor Company. It was just like the equivalent of you owning 100% of like a 20 to 40 billion dollar company today. He was so obsessed with control. He Like he bought a railroad. It's like not only do I want to like control all every single like design and part that goes into the Model T and all of my cars. It's like I want to make sure that all those parts get to me and I want to control the logistics of them getting to me. And what's fascinating about Elon is like he just went and like bucked the trend of the American automobile industry at the time, which was like subcontractor subcontractor subcontractor. He talks about this over and over again and like they're just not even making their own …

エリック#119

何も滑り込ませていない。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#120

意図的に滑り込ませたとは言っていない。イーロンの直接引用に感謝。「置き換えられない唯一のものは時間だ。」数ページ後。「チームに言わなければならない。設備や金を捨てるのはいい。時間を捨てるのはだめだ。」

EN

And he's like, "I'm just going to go back and do it the way it used to be done." But I think the reason that it's so important is like not only do you have control, but it's like how you make a cost-efficient product. Because if you're having a subcontractor after subcontractor, I think when he he did the initial calculation, he wasn't calling it the idiot index, which we could talk about, but at the time of the rockets, he realized that like 98% of the cost of a rocket was not from what it was made out of. He's like, "Where the hell is the money going?" And he was like, "Oh, it's going from this contractor who's this subcontractor actually hired another subcontractor who hired another subcontractor who hired another subcontractor before I get to the actual person, like you said, bending the metal or making the thing."

エリック#121

互いの時間の浪費を最小化すること、特に例外的な起業家や例外的なエンジニアが根本的制約だと特定したあと。次は、どれだけ効果的に使っているか、どれだけ揃っているか。イーロンはコミュニケーターとして実は過小評価されている。Steve Jobsのような超洗練されたプレゼンターじゃないが、読んで、よく編集されたトランスクリプトを読むと、伝える明晰さは極めて高い。優れたCEO、リーダー、創業者がどれだけ明晰で反復的でなければならないかを君はよく語る。チームを超明晰に伝え揃えなければならない。

彼には「一の力」がある。チーム全体が向かう一つのメトリクス。会議の最初に、そのメトリクスが最初のスライドになければならない、と几帳面だ。最適化しているものだ。自動運転では介入なしで走ったマイル数。Neuralinkでは一分あたり脳に刺す電極数。チームが向かう単一のキーメトリクスがあり、あらゆる判断がそこを通る。「このメトリクスを前に進めるか?」矢印を揃える本当に良い方法で、特定した最も重要な目標にチームが取り組み、できるだけ効果的にやっていると彼が知る方法であり、二次目標に気を散らさないよう互いを正直に保つ方法だ。

EN

There's actually a very important like a meta to that, which is he has a completely different vision and set of incentives. So, the whole aerospace industry to date had basically been supported by cost-plus contracts from the government. And so, what is their incentive? Their incentive is to spend as much … money as they can cuz they make a percentage of the budget. And they're not actually incentivized to to succeed. They're not incentivized Well, maybe they're incentivized to succeed, but they're not incentivized to succeed economically and they're not necessarily incentivized to succeed on the original deadline. What Elon did is went to the people actually awarding these contracts and said like, "We want an outcome-based contract. I want to be incentivized to drive down the cost. I want to be incentivized to hit the deadlines." Like he wanted to compete at low cost. Like for all the the talk that happens about him doing things that have never been done before, he is all the things that he's doing that have never been done before because he drives cost down. And he drives cost down because the vision is not make as much money as I can. It wasn't start a new aerospace company that's as profitable as possible. It was get us to Mars, which means drive down the cost of getting a payload off Earth as low as possible, which means I want to be incentivized to build a system that is as low cost as possible. And once he did that, he did start winning all these contracts and winning these like get actual outcome based things, which by the way, better for the government, better for taxpayers. That is a heroic thing to go in and say, I know I could get paid X to be to do mediocre work or to do marginally better work. But I actually want to take the risk. I want to burn the boats. I want my back to the wall. I want to know that we have to clear this threshold that nobody has ever crossed before, and I want to go tell my team that because that's how we're actually going to achieve this objective that everybody thinks I'm crazy for setting, which is get us to Mars. We just make this very massive orders of magnitude leap in the efficiency of like a human engineering system. It is such a different approach, and that was all the way back to his like his sci-fi dream and his purpose-driven nature. It's the same thing with Tesla. But he didn't go out and say, I want to make a profitable electric car company. He said, I want as many human beings as possible driving electric cars because that's how we're going to solve climate change. That's how we're going to put a dent in this. And so all of his decisions are not, how do I maximize profits while making electric cars? It is, how can I get as many people as possible driving electric cars? They have to be as cheap as possible. I have to drive that down. I need to simplify the product. I need to get a massive volume so that the scale of the manufacturing supports a really, really, really low price point. And so he just keeps making these like principle-driven decisions from a very long-term view. Like his his view is so zoomed out that it's actually really difficult to relate to, and he keeps doing these things that seem crazy or stupid or visionary or counterproductive, but isn't uh uh to the prevailing wisdom of the industry, but it's not from a sense of like they're doing this, so I'm going to do this. It's not even from a sense of like this is a strategically optimal local thing. It is like I am working on this gigantic mission, and I will make every decision possible to the service of this gigantic mission. And that's why he's so strategically differentiated. Like it is it is back to the paradox of like when you're doing something that shooting for a target that nobody else is even shooting for, um you are incentivized by these completely different set of systems, and those incentives drive all of these decisions, and that's why Tesla and SpaceX both have the same dynamic where they're doing things that nobody else is doing.

センラ#122

再び世界級のコミュニケーションだと思う。人間が覚えられることは限られている。会社全体を一つのことに組織できる——良くなっているか。成功をどう判断するか。

---

EN

There's two things that come to mind uh when you're talking about that. One, I want to talk about that I think people should heavily invest and maybe practice on their ability to like distill ideas and communicate like something complex in a simple way, and I think Elon's, you know, maybe arguably one of the best people in the world at doing that. The second part, which is a theme throughout everything, especially and I think it's most notable in SpaceX, is like cost could making cost control an obsession, is that something you like graft onto the organization after? It was there before the organization even started. When he has this idea where he's just like, why the hell are these Russian ICBMs so expensive? And he starts doing the first first principles first principles thinking, uh which is, you know, everybody knows the story. Which is interesting, but then him describing it in another way, which I found was way more memorable. He's like, "Why would Russia be the only way they can make a cost-effective rocket? And you go and it's in your book." And he goes, "Do we drive Russian cars? Do we use Russian appliances? Like, there's just no way that they this country figured out how to make the most cost-effective launch vehicle." And he goes, "You see, America's a pretty competitive place. We should have the most cost-effective launch vehicle." Which obviously now he's like absolutely dominating in that. But the again, it's like speaking in that manner is like you could say, "Okay, well I broke down you know from first principles thinking all the parts and looked up what it was on the commodities exchange or you could say Why aren't we driving Russian cars?

センラ#123

数か月話してきた。本の早期コピーをくれてありがとう。数か月イーロンについて話し、この会話でもすでに出た。今朝のコーヒーでも、電話でも。失敗は壊滅的でなければほぼ無意味だ、というアイデア。本に面白い一文がある。「何かを長くやるほど、累積でミスは増える。」

EN

Right? Is your dishwasher at home? Is your fridge Russian?

エリック#124

予測のセンスについて語っているが、これらの失敗を培養しているでもある。早すぎることを気にしない。特定の予測で間違うことを気にしない。何度も言う。「予測のタイミングでは滅多に正確じゃない。でも予測の方向はほぼ常に正しい。一年ずれるかも、二年、時には五年。でも方向が正しいこと——未来の向かう先と我々が取り組んでいることについてズームアウトしているなら——特定のブレークポイントより圧倒的に重要だ。」

EN

No.

センラ#125

何度も話してきた別のことに飛びたい。この本を作る述べられた目標のひとつは、もっと多くの人にものを作ってほしい、ということだ。他人の人生を良くするプロダクトやサービスを実際に作る。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#126

ものを作れ。重要なものを作れ。できるだけ安く作れ。

EN

Like America makes a great … and we make it great and cheap. Why can't we do the same thing for this like domain that I want to operate in?

センラ#127

このポッドキャストでTobi Lütkeと話した。人生でいちばん好きな会話のひとつだった。最後に彼が「実は君と俺は同じ仕事だ。起業家を増やすことだ」と言った。彼はShopifyを通じて。僕は明らかに、歴史上の偉大な起業家の伝記を全部読み、集合知を次の世代に押し下げている。多くの場合、君の本やシリーズを手に取った人が「待って、自分も何かできる」と思い、小さくてもアイデアを当てはめると思う。

このセクションは二ページ、一ページ半くらい。すごく重要だ。ほとんど全部ハイライトした。再びイーロンの言葉だ。「我々はものを作らなければならない。製造は過小評価されている。難しい。ものを作る人に狂った敬意がある。」このページでいちばん好きな文だ。なぜ重要か。「経済を、ただものを生む魔法の何かだと思う馬鹿げた見方がある。愚か者に言わせろ。ものを作らなければ、ものはない。現実から切り離された人がいる。政府が全員に小切手を送れば全部うまくいく、という考えは明らかに正しくない。金を立法して物事を解けない。ものを作らなければ——再び言う——ものはない。技術進歩は不可避じゃない。抽象概念じゃない。人間が技術を作る。」

EN

The answer is because it had been like a government contracted driven oligopoly for the last like couple decades basically. And and NASA was like amazing and pioneering but hadn't been hadn't like really applied themselves to this to this project. And like that is a thing that people forget is like the original vision for SpaceX was not start a launch company. Elon's original goal was to increase NASA's budget and he was willing to just burn a hundred million dollars on a philanthropic mission to display a greenhouse on Mars. So like shoot a greenhouse to Mars with existing rocket technology, get this photo on the front page of every paper that was like a little plant on the red planet, the first time life had trans- transferred to another planet. And he's like that'll probably increase NASA's budget and like spur this wave of exploration and interest in space. And when he tried to do that he discovered that the the space launch market was so expensive and uninnovative and hadn't been moving forward and that's actually how he discovered the opportunity to start SpaceX. It was like that's what's actually going to move this market forward. And then he sort of ended up almost accidentally as a byproduct of making that progress moving into Starlink and now moving into like solar computing space.

エリック#128

そう。

EN

So the Starlink thing is interesting. It's in the book and it's also in the the Max Olson essay that you and I keep referencing which like if you're not on the frontier like

センラ#129

「やらなければ起きない。誰かが本当の仕事をしなければならない。」

EN

Yeah.

エリック#130

これがクリップだ。Joe Roganポッドキャストに出ていたやつで、「この本を書かなきゃ」と思った。

EN

Elon obviously wants to operate on the frontier in the domains that he's operating in. And the reason that is important is not only because he he wants to push his his missions forward but you also unlock opportunities you can't see unless you're on the actual frontier.

センラ#131

もっと。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#132

彼がこんなに明晰なコミュニケーターで、これがこんなに重要なアイデアだと特定した。自分の世代の起業家、見上げるリーダー、作るコンテンツを考え、できるだけ多くの人の頭にインストールしたい。「君とTobyは、できるだけ多くの起業家を作ることが仕事だ」と言う。僕は起業家を作ることを信じる。良いアイデア、有用なアイデア、正しいアイデアを広め、知識をできるだけ多くの人に広げることを信じる。信じられないほど重要なミームだ。

みんな情報プロダクトを作ったり、できるだけ少ない価値でできるだけ高く課金したり、コモディティ事業を始めたり、最悪はできるだけ少なくやりながらできるだけ多く得ようとしたり、普遍的基本所得を立法して二度と働かない、みたいに走り回っていたら——これが前進の仕方じゃない。成長の仕方じゃない。互いを世話する仕方じゃない。ものを生産し建てなければならない。本の最初の文はたぶん、「栄光を目指すな、仕事を目指せ。有用であれ。同胞全員に利益になることをやれ。」

EN

And if they didn't have uh you know the the ability to put up the idea to have I think there's like 9,000 satellites in the Starlink constellation now, somewhere around there. It's like an insane number and obviously increasing. It's like that couldn't have happened when you're launching at the time and when he first founded SpaceX, I think they said they were launching what, like two, four launches a year, something like that. And I think there's now a SpaceX launch every like two days.

エリック#133

イーロンはハードで本当にポジティブな動機の両方を持つ。クリーン燃料とダーティ燃料を同時に燃やす。厳しい子供時代から逃げ、自分に信じられない価値があることを証明しようとしつつ、本当に美しい巨大な野望もある。多くの人に偉大な仕事を鼓舞し、最も効果的なやり方を学ばせている。これらの会社から出てくる起業家の文化全体を育て教育している。SpaceX出身の創業者がすでに信じられないことをやっている。これらの人が働く強度とペースとビジョンは、信じられない次世代の起業家を招くと思う。この本がこれらのアイデアを頭に入れ、何が重要で、何に取り組み、誰と取り組み、どう取り組むかを選ぶ助けになれば。

EN

I found one of my all-time favorite quotes when I was reading the book Zero to One. The quote says, "The single most powerful pattern I have noticed is that successful people find value in unexpected places. And they do this by thinking about business from first principles instead of formulas. That is exactly what AppLovin has done with their new advertising platform Axon. Axon is the most powerful advertising platform in a generation. Axon allows you to capture undivided attention. Axon ads are full-screen videos that are watched for an average of 35 seconds. Retention that blows other ad platforms out of the water and you can launch in minutes. You set the goal and Axon achieves it. No complex setup, no expertise needed and Axon scales quickly. They can put your ads in front of over a billion potential customers. Other businesses have seen immediate results, scaled to hundreds of thousands of dollars of spend per day and increased their revenue by millions and most advertisers aren't even thinking about this channel yet. Less than 1% of advertisers have access to Axon, so you want to get started quickly and you can do that by going to axon.ai. That is axon.ai.

センラ#134

同意する。最も重要なアイデアのひとつだと思う。Max Olsonのエッセイで好きなのは、「SpaceXの出力は特に、より安いロケットではない。難しいことをするよう訓練された人々と、それらのアイデアを異なるドメインに当てはめることだ」ということだ。大事なのは、もっとものを作ること、もっとディールをすることや金融に入ることじゃない。惑星でいちばん、たぶん歴史でいちばんの起業家が言っている——何と言った?

「金融と法に才能の過剰配分がある。賢い人が金融に入りすぎている。もっと少なくすべきだ。」

EN

I want to go to some more ideas directly from Elon. Again, the subtitle of your book I think is super important.

エリック#135

そう。

EN

Yep.

センラ#136

「もっと多くの人がものを作るべきだ。」直接引用だ。「金融をする人を減らし、ものを作る人を増やすべきだ。」すごく重要だ。「製造はかつてアメリカで高く評価されていた。最近はそうでもない。間違いだと思う。」「車を作るのは正直な一日の稼ぎだ。何かを作る、あるいは有価値なサービス——良いエンターテインメント、良い情報——を提供することは、やる価値があることだ。」セクションを閉じるのは、再びあの一文。「ものを作る人に狂った敬意がある。」

創業者アーカイブの頭の中に戻って、偉大な創業者のどれだけがものを作り、製造し、建て、物理的なものを動かしていた?

EN

Elon Musk's most useful ideas in his own words.

エリック#137

最も有名な、名前が知られている泥棒男爵を思い浮かべると、金融をやった泥棒男爵は本質的に一人で、Jay Gouldくらい。J.P. Morgan——違う見解がある。読める本は全部読んだが、父の方がはるかに手強い個人だと思った。J.P. Morganが死んで遺産規模が明らかになると——忘れたが5000万くらい、当時でもたくさん——Andrew Carnegieが「ああ、思う。彼は金持ちですらなかった」と言う。でもCarnegieは鋼、Rockefellerは石油、Vanderbiltは輸送。彼らはものを建てていた。本質的に産業全体を作っていた、本当に考えれば。産業の中で最良の会社を建てつつ、産業を作っていた。

EN

Yep.

センラ#138

イーロンにいちばん近いアナログはそれらの名前だ。他にはいないと思う。なぜ特異かに戻る。Mark Zuckerbergなしでもソーシャルネットワークはあった。Googleなしでも検索エンジンはあった。Bill GatesなしでもOSはあった。地球最大の会社の一部で信じられない実行だったが、特異だとは思わないし、これら両社から見るのと同じ寿命は見ないと思う。

EN

It's like when I was describing to friends like what I was reading, I was like it's 200 pages 200 pages of just Elon talking to you directly to you.

エリック#139

製造と物理的なものを建てることがどれだけ重要かを彼が語るのは清々しい。本で言う。「製造が堀だ。製造競争相手を定義する二つはスケールの経済と技術だ。技術レベルを最大化しスケールレベルを最大化すれば、明らかに最も競争的な状況になる。だからこれらの工場はクソでかい。」

EN

Yep.

センラ#140

Teslaはアメリカで多くのものを建て、サプライチェーンを後ろ向きに遡っている。リチウムが足りないからアメリカでリチウム精製を始める。チップがボトルネックになったから自社で作り始めている。できるだけ効率的にプロダクトコストを下げるために、サプライチェーンを上下に攻撃し続ける。

すでに何度か触れたが、技術を絶対的限界まで持って行き、フロンティアで運営したい。

EN

And like you're going to be able to like you can read it straight through if you want or you can just go to a certain chapter and like I think keeping this book on your desk and reading, you know, a few pages every few days is like a great idea, like a tool for your career.

エリック#141

そう。

EN

It's set up as a like dialogue. I want it to feel like you're out to dinner with Elon Musk actually.

センラ#142

再び、何年もイーロンを研究する人がどこにも聞いたことのない引用を見つけるのが上手い。技術を開発しているなら可能な最大レベルまで押し上げるべきだ、と語り、そうしていない誰かの例を出す。「F-22戦闘機を建てて、丘を転がしてぶつけ合う人に売るようなものだ。技術の使い方じゃない。」

EN

Again, I like I want to hammer on this idea like he's just completely, you know, he he came to the same conclusion that most of his successful entrepreneurs did, which is like vertically integrate vertically integrate control much as your business as possible. That also ties in and and they said it wasn't like a philosophical thing for him. It was these other companies move too goddamn slow.

エリック#143

Zip2の経験の帰結だ。ソフトウェアを建てて、レガシーメディア会社に売って新聞をオンラインに移そうとしていた。顧客とのあいだに遅い古い会社がいるのに売るのに超イライラした。永遠に持ち続けた初期の教訓——まっすぐ消費者へ行け。すべてを所有し、最終判断をするのは顧客だ。技術をまっすぐ顧客に持って行け。

EN

Yep.

センラ#144

イーロンについて思うのは、仕事についての仕事はなく、ただ仕事だ、ということだ。「決断を延々と揺れ動くより、道を選んで動き続けろ。」

EN

And I'm in the section of your book where he talks about time and this this was fascinating to me. The reason I invited you on and I wanted to have this conversation with you was like I said, I've read every book I could find on Elon. I've read countless books on the history of SpaceX. I've done 10 episodes on the guy, and yet I found stuff in your book that I've never found anywhere else, which again goes to I think how thorough you are. But I want to go to just read a couple of things and throw it at you and see if it has any thoughts. We already mentioned this. A maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle. And he said his whole thing is like don't waste time. Get rid of all large meetings unless you're certain they're providing values to the whole audience, which case keep them short. Also, get rid of frequent meetings unless you're dealing with extremely urgent matter. Meeting free This is so good such a good observation by Elon. Meeting frequency should drop rapidly once the urgent matter is resolved. That makes me think of the observation by the guy at NASA who's observing SpaceX. Like wait, there's a problem. It looks like a a flash mob.

エリック#145

PayPalの話も、決断をできるだけ速くし、動き続けろ。速度に戻る。速度がすべて。

EN

Yep.

センラ#146

「大事なのは勝つことだ。小さな仕方でなく。」

EN

Like flash mobs don't stay there forever. Why are you having this recurring meeting? Walk out of a meeting or drop out of a call as soon as obvious you aren't adding value. It is not rude to leave. It is rude to make someone else stay and waste their time. This is I've double underlined several things in your book. This is one of them. The only true currency is time. And then he tells this story cuz he talks about that speed is both offense and defense. And this was fascinating story that I hear I haven't heard anybody else talk about. He says the best offense and defense is speed. The SR-71 Blackbird is a military plane with almost no defense except acceleration. It was never shot down, not even once. Over 3,000 missiles were shot at the SR-71 Blackbird and none hit. All it did was go faster. The power of speed is an underappreciated as a competitive factor.

エリック#147

競争的な男だ。勝つのが大好き。彼が取り組んでいることに取り組んでいるのは幸運だ。固有の人格は、入ったどんな産業でも支配する。人類が直面する最も重要な問題のいくつかに取り組んでいるのは、どれだけ幸運か。

EN

This is actually I think both Tesla and SpaceX's core advantage is like how quickly they iterate and design new technologies. Like he open-sourced the patents for Tesla. Go ahead. Go Go copy it. Like good luck. Because by the time you're producing the things that they've open-sourced, like they're going to be 5-10 years ahead. And there's a bunch of stuff in that book about what he's learned from from military history. And he's like, "The decisive factor in most, certainly every modern war, but many wars, is the speed of technological innovation." Not tactics, not size, but this technology asymmetry. And the longer the war, the more important the speed of iteration becomes. Not where you started, but how quickly you're developing something new.

センラ#148

才能を悪に使えた。

EN

He continues, "A factory moving twice the speed is another factory is basically equivalent to two factors."

エリック#149

インセンティブシステムに戻る。資本主義に感謝だ。ナポレオンは巨大なエネルギーと輝きで多くの良いことをしなかった。多くの土地を取り、多くの土地を失い、多くの人が死んだ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#150

Jimmy SoniのClaude Shannon伝を読んだ?

EN

And I love this. I have a running triage of what I do at each company. Constantly thinking, "What is the most useful thing I can do?" Which goes back to that tip of the spear meme that's tip of the spear focus. Like, what is a limiting factor? Literally get on a plane, go and go to where whatever limiting factor is, and don't leave until that is resolved. Which is another form of speed.

エリック#151

読んでいない。

EN

It's speed of identifying the bottleneck and then going to it and attacking it and resolving it. Like, every one of those steps is an increase in speed that pays off. And there's so many things like this is a tiny story, but I love it because I think it's an example. It's a thing that happens in every single company that usually takes 2 weeks that he does in an hour. Right? So, he's like interviewing a machinist. And 20-minute, 30-minute interview. He wants to hire the guy. So, he asks him how much he costs. Haggles right there. Come to terms. Somebody's like standing beside him with a offer. So, he's like, "All right, fill in the blanks. Here you go." Signs it, goes to work.

センラ#152

『A Mind at Play』だと思う。情報理論で有名になったが、伝記の中で賞を取ったときの素晴らしい講演がある。「歴史が征服者と政治家を祝うのは本当に奇妙だ。実際に祝うべきはイノベーター、発明家、エンジニアだ」と。たぶん60年前。

EN

Like, same day.

エリック#153

Claude Shannonは信じられない例だ。すでに話したことだが、本当に重要だと思う。イーロンだ。「多くの起業才能と資金がインターネットに行く。自動車、ソーラー、宇宙などの他のセクターには新規参入者が少ない。それらの領域に入る起業家も、スタートアップに入る資本も多くない。これは問題だ。イノベーションは産業への新規参入者から来る傾向がある。寡占では誰もイノベートを強いられない。新規参入者がイノベーションを何より駆動する。だから私はそれらの産業で新しい会社を建てることに努力を捧げた。」

EN

Same day. And by the way, it's Saturday at like 6:00 p.m. So, like, your your description of like how he uses time, it's like he uses all of it. Immediately. Like, that's such an important insight. And he is it's why these, not just he, but also these companies move so quickly. Like, when you come behind, I feel like a lot of people talk about the tactics. Like, yes, he moves fast. Yes, he has first principles thinking. Yes, he works on the bottleneck. But when you combine these things, it's it's like a Lollapalooza from Charlie Munger, right? It is like this is not a 10% on a 10% on a 10%. If you're working on the most important thing with manic intensity and you're doing that 100 hours a week instead of 40 hours a week, you are orders of magnitude beyond the productivity of somebody else. And he's been doing this for decades. So, no wonder he's so far ahead. Yes, he's smart. Yes, he's intense. But he's not superhuman. He's not orders of magnitude smarter than his competitors. But the way that he works and the the methods that he uses, the mindset that he has puts him orders of magnitude ahead.

センラ#154

実際に再現可能な、過小評価された戦術のすごい話があると思う。SpaceXを始めることを考えていたとき——ロシアでの悪い経験のあと、打ち上げ市場に入ろうと考えている——「会社を始める」とは言わない。実現可能性調査をする。偉大な打ち上げ機に携わったエンジニアを集め、君が言うように棚ごと貪り読み、会える人全員に話し、経験あるエンジニアとの一連の会議を組んで、打ち上げがどれだけ良くなりうるかを吟味する。第一原理から。白紙から。この市場で何が可能か。この作業を通じて桁違いの突破が可能だという結論にほぼ同時に達したのが、PayPalを売ったときだった。

「現金がある。専門家でこのアイデアを吟味した。」でもドリルダウンする価値があるのは、この時点で彼はほぼ30、あるいはそれ以上で、ソフトウェアしかやっておらず、学部で物理を学んだがハードウェアを建てたことがなく、本を読み人に話し突き進むことで本質的にロケット科学者になる方法を学んだ、ということだ。「ほとんどの人は学ぶ能力を自己制限する。ロケット科学を学んだことはなかったが、途中で身につけた」と言う。意味のあるミッションを特定したら、そのミッションを達成するために必要な人間になる——何が可能かの強力な例だ。

EN

I love that you you describe it as a Lollapalooza. I think that's what I'm trying to get across to you. Like the podcast I've been doing on Elon, the conversation I when I have with you, the conversation we're having right now, your book. It's like you have to use all the ideas cuz then combined and they can be applied they can be applied to like anything. I'm not building rockets. They're literally like right before we started recording like there's this idea of like finding a limiting factor even for like the show. Me and my partner Rob who's sitting over there. It's like we've identified there's two. We want to go faster and increase production. Well, what are big bottlenecks? We have two of them and we're attacking both of them. I was just you heard me talking to another team member right before we started recording. I was like, there's one thing that I'm, you know, not happy about. It's like we need to drill down on this over and over and over again. It's like you can use this for anything. Uh there's something that you have in your book which I read for the first time. I think I read this guy named Ashley Vance wrote this biography of Elon I think in 2013

センラ#155

明らかにエージェンシーが高い。伝記の話で好きなのは、みんながどれだけ軽視したかだ。「ただのソフトウェア野郎が高いおもちゃで遊んでいる」と記述された。

EN

It was the first one, yeah.

エリック#156

プレスもそうだったが、友人も。今は否定するだろうが、みんな思いとどまらせようとしていた。この場所には墓場しかない。ロケットのビデオを見せてくる人。誰も試したことがないわけじゃない。みんなが失敗しただけだ。

EN

Yeah, it's the first episode of Founders Ever in 2016. I did an episode on it.

センラ#157

失敗した人は多い。ほとんど知られていないから興味が尽きないAndy Beal。他産業で独立して金を作り、ロケット会社を試し、自分の金をたぶん数億燃やし、信号になった理由は、テキサスで場所を探しているときBealが以前使っていた物件を借りられたからだ——Beal Aerospaceだと思う。それが一種のジャンプスタートになった。

EN

Everybody should go listen to that. David will hate it.

エリック#158

Bealの大きな動機のひとつは、「失敗しても、この金を失っても——最も可能性が高い結果で、少しじゃなく大きく——ボールを前に動かしたことになる。重要なミッションだ」ということだ。火星ミッションにこの金を燃やす考えで入る。「宇宙打ち上げ技術の進歩に金を無駄にしても、少なくともAndy BealがSpaceXを助けたインフラを残したのと同じように進歩した。」これらのことは積み上がり複利する。起業家がボールを前に動かそうとして失敗しても、エコシステムは前に動く。我々が持つ人間システムの美しさの一部だ。

EN

No, don't do that.

センラ#159

どこにも見たことのないもう一つの名言。「噛めるより多くを噛む習慣があり、シマリスの頬でそこに座っている。」

EN

[laughter]

エリック#160

すごいビジュアルだ。

EN

The way I think is like So, we're talking about speed and time and building products, companies, everything else. But he even applies it and you just mentioned this that he has this like weird long-term view that if you don't have that, you're not really going to understand the decisions he's making. It's like so the way I describe this paragraph when I read it to you is like this is how Elon thinks about money. And this I've never heard anywhere else. In early SpaceX, I told the team everything we did was a function of our burn rate. We were burning through $100,000 per day. In the same way I expected the revenue in 10 years to be $10 million a day. Every day we were slower to achieve our goals was a day of missing out on that revenue. So this is there's a story in the Ashley Vance book where they're like I don't get Elon. It's like I just went to him and try to get him to spend, you know, $25,000 on a part. He said no because he thinks I could build it for 2,000 cuz the idiot index. That's that part should be 2,000 figure out how to do it. Yet he just let us use his jet and burn $60,000 of jet fuel to get a part to Hawaii that would save us a work day. Yeah. And so that makes perfect sense if you spend 60 grand because that's that day 10 years from now is 10 million.

センラ#161

今もやってると思う?

EN

Yeah. And and you unlock an entire team and all the infrastructure value. So a thing that's underrated about Elon in my view is like this this hyper fluency across domains. Like he this is a simple example but he studied both physics and economics as an undergraduate. He has been like running his business and functionally being head of product at all of his companies. It's an extremely wide like multivariate set of trade-offs that he's looking at and he deeply understands to your point the zoomed out view of opportunity cost and compounding. So thinking about where a business could be in 10 years, where the bottleneck is today, what the burn rate is of all the money and equipment and time and attention and what gets unlocked not just today but the potential future value of that is really really interesting. And that's why I think a powerful source of the maniacal urgency is cuz he's like hair on fire all the time. It's like there's there's billions of dollars at stake every single hour of the day. Like, we can be working with such greater intensity and the rewards for doing it go up every time we're able to move faster.

エリック#162

うん。倍賭けして巨大なリスクを取り続けるのが、再び過小評価されている部分だ。Teslaの不可能に見えた報酬パッケージのトレードオフを取り、みんなが「絶対うまくいかない」と言った。歴史最大の報酬パッケージを得た。最もリスクが高かったから。またやる。Teslaが何兆ドル会社になれば一兆ドル、ならなければゼロ。再び、何度もすべてをラインに。船を燃やし、背中を壁に、前に最大速度以外のオプションがない状況に自分を置く。

EN

Yeah, I just flipped to this randomly flipped to this page in the book, which I think speaks to what you're saying. I want to before I read it I think what you were referencing there is he talks about the fact that finance and engineering is in the same head.

センラ#163

聞いているあいだに本をめくって他の面白いものがないか見ていた。今言ったことが、たまたま開いたページの小見出しと完璧に一致する。「正気の縁」。いくつか読む。おかしい。

「一度にこんなに多くのことがあって、どう優先順位をつける?」「優先順位付けは通常、選択ではなく絶望からだ。『リソースをどう使うかのんびり決めよう』じゃない。『これは動いていない。動かさなければ破産する。動かさなきゃ』だ。」そして「インディアナ・ジョーンズが神殿を駆け下りる感じだ。巨大な岩が追いかけてくる。地面の巨大な穴を跳ばなきゃ。遅くなると岩に潰され、跳び損ねると穴で死ぬ。それが優先順位付けだ。」

EN

Yes, the same brain.

エリック#164

スケールした起業家が感じるやり方だ。Brian Armstrongをインタビューしたときもそう聞こえた。プロダクトマーケットフィットに達し、何年もできることは起きて生き延びることだけ。サーバが燃えている、サポートチケットが来る。神よ、上にいなきゃ。走り続けて穴を跳ばなきゃ。

EN

in most companies it's separated, it's him. So, he wants to make something, they want to know the cost or the potential growth in revenue like no, that that discussion is taking place with me. So, then there again, I can move faster because it's in one head.

センラ#165

「チームをどう動機づける?」「ウルトラハードコアで行け、と言った。」Teslaのプロダクション・ヘルについて。「工場に三年住んだ。工場のあらゆる部分をマニアックに走り回った。チームと一緒に住んだ。床で寝た。これは実は賢い。床で寝たのは、苦しいチームが床にいる俺を見て、象牙塔にいないと知るためだ。彼らが経験するどんな痛みも、俺はもっと経験した。」

EN

decision. I mean, how many of the great founders of history are like that kind of sole decision maker?

エリック#166

軍事史の研究からまっすぐ来る。将軍が前線から指揮するとき、将軍がいるところで部隊はよく戦う。ナポレオン的なことだ。彼が体現した。「工場の床で寝ただけでなく、会議室の外で寝た」とも言う。ホテルが通り向かいにあった、と従業員に聞いた。ホテルに行って戻っても存在感は同じだったはずだ。でも工場の床で寝ているのを人に見せたかった。個人的快適への無関心があるだけでなく、リーダーシップのために個人的快適を犠牲にする。エンジニアの信頼を建てるために。人からこんなに引き出せる理由の一部は、これらの目立つ、見える、触れる、明白な自己犠牲のディスプレイだ。何度も何度も自分を押し上げる。正気の縁、と言う。

Talulah Rileyについて2008年のことを君が語った。夜驚があって、叫んで吐いて起きる。

EN

Yeah, there's not many committees that uh make great things. Yeah. Uh in fact, I'm reading I've never read Atlas Shrugged before and the funny thing is uh I'm I'm reading it. I actually might do an episode on it. I think it's an interesting thing. But in beginning of the book there's one person that is very much like an Elon character and her brother is kind of her partner and he's the opposite and and she's made a decision to do something. She's like, "Well, how did you decide?" She's like, "I just decided." She's like, "But we have to check with the board and all these other people." She's like, "No, we don't. We're just going to make the decision."

センラ#167

Talulah Rileyはあの苦しみのときの妻だ。ベッドで、眠ろうとして、たいてい眠りの中で叫んでいる。

EN

There's actually over you'll see this as a as a pattern as you read. There's like a pattern of responsibility and and there's a chapter in in my book called like internalized responsibility and over and over again you'll see like the hero characters in Atlas Shrugged everybody else is sort of trying to like find someone else to make a decision or like shove risk and Diagoras is like, "I am responsible. This is me making this decision. I'm responsible for this decision. Like, if it's right or wrong, hold it against me later." And like you'll hear Elon do that in in like launch rooms. It's kind of like hey, this is like we've identified a risk factor, go or no go. And like him in that moment standing in front of like rocket worth tens of millions and like the public watching him in a launch is like running a calculation like the physics the risk, the economics, the market value, the speed of the company, when the next launch window is, and he'll be like, "Take the risk. Let's let's launch the rocket. Let's go." Like, over and over and over again so many of those decisions that he's just like solely responsible for. And that's why I think these lessons are so valuable. Like, who else has lived this kind of experience and honed these lessons to to deliver to us?

エリック#168

「正気の縁」は「働いた」の婉曲じゃない。ヘラクレス級の試練だ。

EN

So, going back, let's extend this idea of like how Elon thinks about money. Says Tesla is getting to the point where every high-quality minute of thinking has a million-dollar impact. He references earlier. That is insane. That's Elon talking. If Tesla's doing 2 billion a week in revenue, that's about 300 million a day, 7 days a week. There are many instances where a half-hour meeting improved the company's financial outcome by 100 million dollars.

センラ#169

開いたページの直接引用。「正気の縁まで働いた。」

EN

This is the highest leverage man on Earth. Like, when you tens of thousands of engineers, how many billions of dollars of capital, billions of dollars of CapEx, factories, like, you know, but he says, "Well, it makes it hard to sleep." There's always something important to go do. And he's he's constantly running a trios on what's the most important thing he can do. That's why he runs no schedule. This jet is him flying all over the world, like, whatever the most important thing is to do.

エリック#170

本と彼の人生からのメタ教訓で、誰でも持ち帰れる。起業のGogginsだ。自分で思うよりずっと多くが可能だ。自分のベストだと思う努力はたぶん30%で、実際はもっと可能だ。時間をフルで巨大に使い、縁まで自分を押せば。これが全員の正しい道だと主張しているわけじゃない。Jasonのタイプの人もいれば、Elon Muskのタイプの人もいる。彼が耐えた痛みと苦しみに耐えられる生きている起業家は他に思いつかない。

EN

Yeah, I think there's a story in the Isaacson book, where I think he's dating Grimes at the time, and she talks She was interviewed by him, and she's like, "I've caught him up in bed. Like, I'm sleeping. I wake up, and he's just sitting there like the thinking man's pose." And he was thinking of like, "When we went to sleep, he's in the thinking man's pose. I wake up, he's still in the thinking man's pose."

センラ#171

いない。でも人は今取っているより多く取れるだろう。青写真でなければ、可能なことの例だよね。

EN

Yeah. There's I mean, there's hours of many stories of like dressed to go to a party, and he's like, "I'm just going to go look at this." And then ends up like spending the night under a rocket like working in a tuxedo.

エリック#172

嫉妬の解毒剤でもあると思う。彼が生きたものを生きたくない。だから「あの競争はしたくない」と言いやすい。でも可能なことを示す。最大努力が本当にどういう姿か。知っておくと本当に役立つ教訓だと思う。

EN

There's a great There There was an early days of SpaceX history, where he shows up and he gets like a Christmas party, and he's like in fancy leather shoes or something. And they're like They're like, "You know, we're going to be out late. When we tour, like, we're not going, and now my fancy shoes are … up." Yeah. Cuz I got I'm like, "I'm literally trying to help build a rocket.

センラ#173

最大努力、常に、どこでも、が彼について本当に思うことだ。もう一つの段落で、速度への執着、コントロールへの執着、コントロールに執着すれば垂直統合につながり、白紙から設計すべきだ、という我々が話しているアイデアの多くとつながる。

EN

Yeah.

エリック#174

そう。

EN

Uh, just some random um quotes from him. I think this is great. This is almost like a a maxim. Avoid serialized dependencies.

センラ#175

第一原理のやり方で。「Teslaには多くの垂直統合がある。バッテリーパック、パワーエレクトロニクス、ドライブトレインを自分で作る。動く必要のあるペースがサプライチェーンが動けるよりずっと速かったから垂直統合した。」いい一文だ。「レガシーサプライチェーンに頼る度合いで、その速度、コスト、技術を含むレガシーの制約を相続する。」Teslaについて語っているが、SpaceXにも正確に当てはまる。

EN

I mean, the most obvious one is just like who starts SpaceX and Tesla at the same time? Like, that's insane. Um, but both of these things are important, so I'm going to like try my best to do them both. Um, the story from PayPal is like a little more generalizable, which is, you know, we have like these regulatory boxes we need to check. We have these partnership integrations we need to run. We have a product we need to build. And the same thing to do is like do one after the other, and these end up being like three-year things because you're not like wasting time building a product if you don't know you're going to get the regulatory clearance you need. And he just attacks this as like, "We're going to do it all all in parallel. Maximum risk, minimum timeline. Do it all in parallel and launch in a year. Ready, go." Um, so these things are you know, Warren Buffett's quote, "You can't get a baby in 1 month by getting nine women pregnant." It's like this sense of like how many things can you do in a row to minimize the overall timeline? And yes, it comes with additional risk, and yes, it's more expensive. But back to the fundamental currency of time being the most valuable thing, like that's actually the thing you should do. And that's a big part, I think, of why the pace of these companies, the velocity of them is so high. And over and over many great entrepreneurs talk about like how underrated velocity is. And Elon talks about it, too, not just like the pace of the company, but the team itself. So, he talks about the team as being a vector sum. And so, imagine like every employee as an arrow. How big the arrow is is maybe how high quality the employee is. Um, how long the arrow is is how fast they're moving. And then Elon's job is to like align them all on the same thing. And so, he talks about how good the team is, how aligned they are, and how hard they're working. Right? Like, that is the vector sum of the team, and that is what's ultimately going to to the progress of the company and how successful they are.

エリック#176

既存サプライチェーンに頼って二桁の改善はできない。今朝話していたことのひとつで、いちばん面白いのは——制約要因を特定しボトルネックに取り組む、はほとんど陳腐なくらい明白に聞こえる、ということだ。

EN

I want to uh bring up a couple things. You just mentioned about his he just constantly hammering on time, not wasting time. But I can't help but notice that in an episode dedicated to Elon, you mentioned you getting nine women pregnant.

センラ#177

でも誰もやらない。

EN

[laughter]

エリック#178

一つ、人はやらない。二つ、一見よりニュアンスがある。制約がエネルギーなら——ピーク負荷は何か、どこから、コスト最適は何か。タービンが最も安ければ、誰が製造している、どこから、どこにある。タービンのどの部品が難しいか。この例で全部ドリルダウンして、「xAIのコンピュートインフラのボトルネックは、実はタービンの羽根の一部、ポータブルな発電機の部品一つだ」となった。一つの部品まで、超高い特異性でボトルネックを特定する。制約の制約の制約まで、ファイブ・ホワイズで全部下ろす。

EN

I don't know if you if you slipped that in there intentionally or not, but we're just going to move on.

センラ#179

もう一度説明して。xAIの制約要因を探している。

EN

I didn't slip anything in

エリック#180

制約はエネルギーだ。チップは買った、建物が要る。最初のスーパークラスタを回していたとき。誰かが建物を立ち上げるのに二年かかる、と言った。「だめだ。やらなければブレークポイントがある。90日でやらなければ死ぬ。六か月でも死ぬかも。」全部立ち上げた。Memphisで建物を見つけ、Nvidiaからチップを買った。冷却と電力が要る。六か月でグリッド相互接続はできない。どうする? ガスタービン——ポータブルエネルギー発電機——を建物の片側に並べる。冷却もそんなに速く入れられない。モバイルの冷蔵トラックを雇って反対側に並べた。可能な限り最速でやる方法は何か。制約の制約の制約は何か。本当にどこを攻めるか、全部下ろして。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#181

最小の細部に注意を払うことにも少し関係する。これもすごく重要だと思う。「ほとんどの人は小さな細部を意識的には気づかないが、無意識には気づく。心は全体印象を取り込む。何かが魅力的かどうかはわかる。正確な理由は指し示せなくても。その感覚は多くの細部の総和だ。醜い、美しい、エレガント、と感じるが、なぜかは分解できない。小さな細部に注意を払え。気づくよう訓練せよ。」そのセクションを読んで、Steve Jobsが歴史でいちばん上手かったと思うことを思った。彼の言い方は、「偉大なプロダクトは、そうある必要以上に良い」。

EN

I'm not I haven't slipped anything in intentionally.

エリック#182

イーロンはデザインセンスでも過小評価されていると思う。Steve Jobsが言ったのとそっくりな引用を聞くことが多い。特に車の設計で重要な部分がある。アルゴリズムのように考える。プロダクトのあいだに存在しなければならない特定の比率、外より内が大きく感じられなければならない、など。絶対に譲らない。初期Teslaの話で、設計判断に不合理なほどこだわり、指を置いて「こうでなければ足りない。美しくない。審美的に足りない」と言う。Steve Jobsがコンピュータにハンドルを付けろと言ったのと同じ——新しい異質な機械との関係を変えるから。

EN

The one thing direct quote from Elon here, thank you very much. The one thing you cannot replace is time. He goes on a few pages later. I have to tell the team, it's okay to scrap equipment or money. It is not okay to scrap time.

センラ#183

本を読んで思ったのは、特定のプロダクトや会社の進捗を追う単一の組織原理、というアイデアだ。単一の目標や、彼が繰り返す何かに分解する。Sam Waltonの自伝に面白い一文がある。会社はもうスケールしている。Samは「人間性として物事を複雑にしすぎる。会社が大きくなると官僚制を足す。創業者の仕事は官僚制をラインの向こうに押し戻すことだ。押し戻し、また這い上がり、また押し戻す。その干満は止まらない」と言う。イーロンが本でこれについて語る面白い仕方は、「どんな会社でも、すごく単純な問いを自分に聞け。今やっている努力は、より良いプロダクトやサービスになっているか。なっていないなら、その努力をやめろ。」

EN

Minimizing the waste of each other's time, especially once you've identified the like exceptional entrepreneur or exceptional engineers are the fundamental constraint. The next is like how effectively are you using them? How effectively are they aligned? And this is a thing where like Elon is underrated actually as a communicator. Like he's not a super polished presenter like Steve Jobs, but especially when you read him and read a well-edited transcript of him, the clarity that he communicates with is like extremely high. And he's got this amazing habit, you know, you talk about often about how clear and how repetitive good CEOs need to be, good leaders, good founders like need to communicate super clearly and align the team. And he's got uh the power of one, like one metric that the entire team is working towards. And he's really methodical about like the beginning of every meeting, we are going to this metric better be on the first slide. It's the thing that we're optimizing for. So when he was working on autonomous cars, it was like how many miles are driven without interventions? When they're working on Neuralinks, it's like how many electrodes are you installing per minute into a brain? So there's always like a single key metric that the team is driving towards that every decision is run through. Like does it drive this metric forward? Does it drive this metric forward? And that's a really good way of aligning all those arrows and for him to sort of know that the team is working on the objective that he's identified as the most important and doing it as most effectively as they can and for themselves to all keep keep each other honest and not get distracted by these like secondary objectives.

エリック#184

忘れやすい真実だ。Teslaは広告しない。金を全部プロダクトか次のプロダクトに戻す。SolarCityで従兄弟たちと溝ができた話がある。SolarCityは非常にセールス駆動の組織で、ドアツードア。プロダクト差別化にフォーカスしていなかった。彼はボードにいて、プロダクトにマニアックに入った。「なぜこれらのクリップがある? なぜ屋根の設置にこんなに時間がかかる? なぜこんなに高い?」Steve Jobs的に——美しいプロダクトを作れ、明らかに良いものにしろ。セールスを追い出せ。凡庸なプロダクトを売るのが上手い組織にしたくない。自分で売れる優れたプロダクトを作るのが上手い組織にしたい。それが全体のエートスだ。

EN

Yeah, I think that's again world-class communication. It's like there's so many limited things that a human being can remember. And so if you can organize your entire, you know, company

センラ#185

プロダクトレベルと会社レベルに同じアイデアを当てはめる、という君の指摘が好きだ。「単純化と削除にウルトラハードコアで行け」——プロダクトでも会社でも。同じアイデアを違う言い方でも繰り返すのが面白い。「キー問題を解くのに必要でないものを除去せよ。」そこで何の例を出すか。初期のStarshipにはドアすらなかった。ドアは要らなかった。軌道に乗ることに超フォーカスする必要があった。ドアは不要な複雑さだった。最初の10機以上は軌道から戻ってこない。だから再び、失敗が組み込まれていると理解している——限界を求めているので失敗する。

再び、「可動部品が最も少ない天才」。複雑なものをスケールするのは本当に難しい。「スケール自体に価値がある。たとえば、小さなロケットを制御するのと同じコンピュータが大きなロケットも制御する。電子機器の重量の割合は小さなロケットでは大きく、大きなものでは消えていくほど小さくなる。」

EN

Yeah.

エリック#186

工場に当てはめるのと同じ論理だ。スケールの固有価値——極端に大きくし、固定費をできるだけ薄め、ボリュームの価値。スポーツカーから始めたのは、小ボリュームでユニット黒字にでき、それからModel S、Model 3。ロケットも同じ。Falcon 1からFalcon 9。異なる製品を異なるエスカレータで戦略を順序づけ、各安定均衡で黒字にする能力は、ビジョナリーで偉大なプロダクトを建てるという話のすべてに対して、やり方は本当に経済的だ、という過小評価された天才の一部だと思う。

EN

around one single thing. It's like is this getting better? Like this is how we're going to judge our success.

センラ#187

本で上手いもう一つのことは、同じアイデアの複数の例を出すことだ。これらのアイデアはすべて互いに関係する。ランディング脚をなぜ外したか——Starship 3だと思う。再び、「物理の限界まで考える。ランディング脚の問題は質量を足すことだ。再突入中に保護しなければならず、着地したどこからでも巨大ロケットを発射台に戻さなければならない。難しい。限界を考えようとしていた。再使用性を達成する最速の方法は何か。発射台に着地することだ。」飛行機は着陸してすぐまた離陸する。ロケットでもそれをやる。発射する塔の腕に着地させればいい。最初に話したとき、狂って聞こえた。イーロンの直接引用。「これまでに作られた最も重い飛行物体を、機械腕で空中から摘む巨大塔をカスタム建造する。でもやった。壮大な光景だ。巨大ロボット腕が巨大ロケットを捕まえる。」

EN

Brad Jacobs has started eight separate billion-dollar companies. He said, "I've come to know a lot of extremely successful people in my life, and they all have one thing in common. They think differently than most people." All of them, to a person, have rearranged their brains to prevail at achieving big goals in turbulent environments where conventional thinking often fails. What Brad noticed is that great business leaders are pattern spotters, but you can't spot patterns if you can't see all of your data. Most businesses only use 20% of their data. Why? Because 80% of customer intelligence is invisible. It's hidden in emails, transcripts, and conversations. That's where HubSpot comes in. With HubSpot, all of your data comes together so you can see the patterns that matter. This is important because when you know more, you grow more, and that is a pattern that never fails. Visit hubspot.com today. That is hubspot.com.

エリック#188

いくつかのことを体現するすごい話だ。限界で考える部分——プラトン的理想は何か。夢見るだけならどれだけ良くなりうるか。そして不可能に見えた。探索しているときに使うすごく具体的な戦術がある。「不条理の範囲内で何が可能か」と問う。狂ったアイデアを投げ、人は「それは狂っている。動かない。不条理だ」と言う。彼は聞く。「何が要るか。Noを言うな。何が真でなければならないか。可能にするには何が要るか。」

何度も出てくるのは、最初は不可能に見え、人が押し返し、だいたい一日やる。人が少し回し始め、また問い、前提を疑い、再び何が要るか聞く。一週間以内に「待って、可能かも」となり始める。このループを何度も通っているから、「いや狂っている」と退けられ、押し返し、「何が要るか」と言い、ブレインストームしろ、一日か一週間設計しろ、可能だと仮定して取り組み始めろ、どれだけ遠くまで行けるか見よう、と言う。何度も、「不可能に見えるが、不可能である根本的な物理法則の理由はない」となる。

すべては「エンジニアリングは魔法であり、物理法則が魔法の限界だ」という信念に戻ると思う。アナロジーじゃない。前に何を設計したかじゃない。すでに解かれた問題じゃない。現在の方法が達成させてくれることじゃない。理論的に可能な限界は何か、そこにできるだけ不合理に押し進む。その線を保ち、「何が要るか」と問い、「試し続けろ。難しいのはわかっている。押し通せ。不可能である理由はない。不可能な理由を見せるか、取り組み続けろ」と言い続けると、人はそれらの押しに応え、不可能に見えたことを何度も達成する。

EN

So you and I have been talking a few months. You were kind enough to give me an early copy of the book. So we've been talking about Elon for a few months, and you brought it up I think already in this conversation. You brought it up earlier this morning when we were having coffee. You brought it up on the phone. This idea of like failure's almost meaningless as long as it's not catastrophic. There's a line in the book that I thought was interesting that he says, "The longer you do anything, the more mistakes you will make cumulatively."

センラ#189

君が書いた本は本当に重要だと思う。千冊買う。ショーノートにリンクを残す。最初の千人がそのリンクをクリックしたら、本を買ってあげる。何が狂っているか考えろ。イーロンは起業家としてだいたい35年のキャリアがある。君は五年、何千時間かけて、会社とプロダクトと新しい技術の建て方についての彼の考え方を、誰かが五時間、十時間で読める本に蒸留した。信じられないほど価値がある。

会話を、君と僕にとって最も重要で、仕事で二人ともやろうとしていることで終えたい。この新しいショー全体の理由は、資本主義の祝賀だ。資本主義へのラブレターだ。「ロールモデルが欲しいなら、誰かがもっと好きになるかもしれないプロダクトを建てる会社を始めた人はどうだ。従業員のために富を作った。仕事を作らなければならなかった。自分と家族のために富を作った。これらは称賛されるべきだ。」イーロンがここで言うことそのものだ。ここで閉じたい。

「有用なプロダクトを大勢に届けて出荷するのは、狂ったように難しい。プロダクトを出荷した会社とそうでない会社のあいだには地獄ほど差がある。昼と夜だ。富を生む偉大なプロダクトとサービスを作るなら、それは称賛されるべきだ。国の、そしておそらく世界の生活水準を上げる。」本を書いてくれてありがとう。時間を割いてこの会話をしてくれてありがとう。

EN

He's talking about his sense of prediction, but it's also cultivating these failures. Like he does not mind being too early. He does not mind being wrong in a specific prediction. He talks how often about he's like, "I'm rarely correct specifically on the timing of a prediction, but the direction of the prediction is almost always correct. So, I might be a year off, I might be 2 years off, and sometimes I'm five. But like being directionally correct, again, once you're zoomed out about the the heading of the future and what we're working towards is massively more important than the specific break points. To make stuff, to make important stuff, to make it as cheap as possible. Yes. This is the clip. I believe he was on the Joe Rogan podcast where I was like, I must write this book. It identified to me that he is like such a clear communicator and this is such an important idea. And I think about, you know, my my like generation of entrepreneurs and the the leaders that we had, the people that we look up to, the content we created, and that's just something that I want to install in as many people's heads as I I can. Like you you you and Toby talk about like your job is to create as many entrepreneurs as I can as you can. Like I believe in creating entrepreneurs. I believe in spreading good ideas, spreading useful ideas, spreading correct ideas, like expanding knowledge into as many people as we can. And this is an unbelievably important meme. If we all run around like creating info products or charging as much as we can while delivering as little value as you can or starting commodity businesses or worse of all, like trying to do as little as possible while getting as much as possible or legislating yourself universal basic income and never working again or whatever. Like this is not how we advance. This is not how we grow. This is not how we take care of each other. Like we have to produce stuff and build stuff. Like I think the first sentence in the book is like, don't aspire to glory, aspire to work. Like aspire to be useful. Do something that is a benefit to all of your fellow humans. I do I do agree with you. I think it's one of the most important ideas. In Max Olson essay, I love what he said. He's like, "The output of SpaceX in particular is not cheaper rockets. It's people being trained to do difficult things and taking those ideas and applying them to different domains." And I think the important thing is like making more things, not doing more deals, not going into finance. Like you have the best entrepreneur on the planet, maybe the best in history, telling you the What did he say? "There is an over allocation of talent in finance and law. Too many smart people are going into finance. We should have fewer people doing that." "And more people making stuff." That is a direct quote. "We should have fewer people doing finance and more people making stuff." Man, this is so important. Manufacturing used to be highly valued in the United States. These days it hasn't been as much, which I think is a wrong. "Making cars is an honest day's living, that's for sure. Making anything or providing a valuable service, like good entertainment, good information, these are valuable things to do." And then I'll close the section with again that that quote, which I my favorite part. "I've got mad respect for makers of things." I mean, if you think about like the the most famous or of like just go through like the robber barons where their names are known, it's just like there's only one there was essentially one robber baron that did finance and that's like Jay Gould. But like J.P. Morgan. I have a different take on that where like if you read I've read every single book I could find on J.P. Morgan. Yeah, he's an interesting character. I found his dad to be much more of a formidable individual than than he was and there's a funny thing when um J.P. Morgan dies they his size of his estate is revealed. I forgot the number it was like 50 million which is still a ton back then, but Andrew Carnegie goes, "Oh, it's a think. He wasn't even a rich man." But like Carnegie and steel, Rockefeller in oil, Vanderbilt in transportation. There's not, you know, they were building things. They were creating I mean, they were creating essentially entire industries if you really think about it. They were building the best company inside the industry, but they were really creating the industries. It's just refreshing for him to talk about how important manufacturing and building physical things that are. I mean, he says in in the book, "Manufacturing is the moat." Two things define manufacturing competitors economies of scale and technology. If you maximize your level of technology and maximize your level of scale, that is obviously going to be the most competitive situation. That's why these plants are so freaking giant. So, we've already touched a few times on the fact that he wants to take technology to its absolute limits and yep and like be operating on the frontier. You again, you did a great job of finding quotes um somebody like studies Elon for years that I've never heard anywhere else. And he was just talking about the fact that, you know, if you're developing technology, it should be pushed to maximum level possible. And then he gives an example of somebody not doing that and he's like, "It was like building F-22 fighter jets and then selling them to people who rolled them down the hill at each other. That's not the way to use the technology." The way I think about Elon is like there's no work about work, just work. So, he has this great quote, "Better to pick a path and keep moving than just vacillate endlessly on a decision." What matters to me is winning and not in a small way. Yeah, he could use his talents for evil. Did you ever read Jimmy Soni's biography of Claude Shannon? I think it's called A Mind at Play. And Claude Shannon made famous for coming up with the information theory, but he gives this great talk in this biography where he wins this award and he's like, "It's really weird that history celebrates like conquerors and like politicians." He's like, "We should actually celebrate innovators, inventors, engineers." And he gives this whole speech and that was probably like 60 years ago. Claude Shannon's an incredible example. Here's another thing we've already talked about, but I think it's really important. A lot This is Elon. A lot of entrepreneurial talent and financing goes to the internet. Other sectors like automotive, solar, and space don't see new entrants. Not a lot of entrepreneurs go into those areas and not a lot of capital goes into those startups. This is a problem because innovation tends to come from new entrants to an industry. In an oligopoly, no one is forced to innovate. New entrants drive innovation more than anything, which is why I have devoted my efforts to building new companies in those industries. He's obviously very high agency. The what I loved about that the story from one of the biographies is how dismissive everybody was. It's like, "Oh, this is just a software guy playing with expensive toys." That's how he was described. There was a lot of failed I mean, one of I find this guy fascinating cuz there's so little known about him, Andy Beal. But Andy Beal was he made money independently in other industry and then tried to do a rocket company, wound up burning I think a couple hundred million of his own money, and then the reason it was really signalized because when they trying to find a place in Texas to set up, it turns out they could lease this property that was previously used utilized by Beal, I think it was Beal Aerospace. And so it kind of like jump-started them. Another great quote that I haven't seen anywhere else. I have a habit of biting off more than I can chew and just sitting there with chipmunk cheeks. That was a great visual, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. [laughter] I mean, he like he keeps An underrated piece of him again is that he like he keeps doubling down and taking massive risk. Like, he took what seemed like that impossible pay package trade-off at Tesla that everyone was like, "Oh my god, this is never going to work." He did it. Got the biggest, you know, comp package in history because it was the riskiest, and I was doing it again. Like, he won't he'll get a trillion dollars if Tesla becomes a trillion trillion-dollar company, but nothing if it doesn't. Like, again, just all on the line over and over again. Burning the boats, putting his back to the wall, putting himself in a situation where there's there's no option but forward at max speed. [laughter] [laughter] [laughter] How do you motivate the team? I told them we have to go ultra hardcore. [laughter] Yeah. It comes straight from his like study of military history, right? Like wherever generals lead from the front line, wherever the general is, the the troops are going to fight better. Like these are Napoleon things um that he exemplified. And he he even says in there like, "Not only did I sleep on the factory floor, but he slept like outside the conference room. It's not like he slept at the factory and I've I've talked to employees there who are like they're like, "There's a hotel across the street." Like it would have been fine if he just went to the hotel and come back. His presence would have been the same. But he wanted people to see him sleeping on the factory floor. He doesn't just like not have concern for his personal comfort. He like sacrifices his personal comfort for leadership. Like for the credibility of his engineers to build trust in that. And that is like part of how he gets so much out of people is like these conspicuous, visible, tangible, obvious displays of self-sacrifice. And it it it does over and over again. He He pushes himself so hard. I mean, the the edge of sanity, he says. Like I work to the edge of sanity. Um you've talked about Talulah Riley in in the 2008 thing. He's having like a night terrors. He'd wake up screaming and puking. Like Yeah, like it is like edge of sanity is not a like euphemism for I worked hard. It is like a Herculean test. Yeah, it's a it is a very like I think a meta lesson from the book and from his life that that anybody can take away. It's It's the It is Goggins of entrepreneurship. It is you are capable of so much more than you think. What you think is your best effort is maybe 30% effort and you're actually capable of so much more. If you make full massive use of time, if you push yourself to the edge. Like I'm not advocating that this is the right path for everybody. I think like some people are Jason I don't know anybody else that could withstand as much pain and torment as he he has. I can't think of another entrepreneur living that has. If it's not a blueprint, is it an example of what's possible, right? Yeah, maximum effort always everywhere is the way I really think about him. I just came across another paragraph that I underlined I think ties a lot of these ideas we're talking about the fact that he's obsessed with speed, obsessed with control and if you're obsessed with control it's going to lead to vertical integration and then you really should just design from a blank sheet of paper and do that in a first principles way. He says there's a lot of vertical integration at Tesla. We make the battery pack, the power electronics and the drive trains ourselves. We vertically integrated because the pace we need to move was much faster than the supply chain could move. That's a great line. To the degree that you rely on the legacy supply chain, you inherit the legacy constraints including their speed, their cost and their technology. He's talking about Tesla, that exact same thing is applies to SpaceX though. But no one does it. it's interesting. Explain that to me again. So, he's trying to find out the limiting factor for xAI. Kind of relates to a little bit about like to just paying attention to the smallest details. Um, this is something that I think is really important, too. It's like most people don't consciously notice the small details, but they do subconsciously. Your mind [clears throat] takes in an overall impression. You know if something is appealing or not, even though you may not be able to point out exactly why. That sense is a summation of many details. Most of us experience this as that's ugly or that's beautiful or wow, that's elegant. Or but that but we cannot break it down why. Pay attention to little details, train yourself to notice them. When I read that section, I thought about what Steve Jobs was I think maybe the best in history at it. And he has this great way of describing this. He says that a great product is better than it has to be. Something I thought about when I was reading your book was, you know, the idea is like we're going to have a a single organizing principle to see to track like the progress on this particular product of this particular company. Yeah, it kind of breaks things down to like a singular objective or a singular something he repeats. There's a a a line in Sam Walton's autobiography, which I thought was very interesting, cuz we're talking about like, you know, Elon has not only started the companies, but now these companies are at scale. And Sam's like, "Listen, it's a human nature to overcomplicate things. As your company grows, you are going to add bureaucracy, and your job as the founder is to beat bureaucracy back over the line. And you're going to beat it back over the line, and it's going to creep back up, and you're going to beat it back over the line. That that ebb and flow will never stop." And one way that Elon talks about this in the book that I thought was interesting, he's just like, "For any company, you just ask yourself a very simple question. Are the efforts that we're doing right now, are the efforts that we're expending resulting in a better product or service?" If they they're If they're not, then you stop those efforts. It's a Yeah, I like the point that you made that like when he applies the same idea to at the product level and at the company level. So, this idea where he's like, "Please go ultra hardcore on simplification and deletion." It's like in the product and in the company. It's a great He he he repeats the same idea in different ways, too, which I thought was interesting. Like, "Eliminate what isn't necessary to solve the key problem. And so he gives an example of what what is he talking about there? Early versions of Starship didn't even have doors. We didn't need doors. We We did need to be super focused on getting to orbit. Doors were just unnecessary complexity. The first 10 ships or more, we were not going to get back from orbit. So then again, understanding that failure is built into it, like we're seeking the limits, so we are going to fail things. Uh and then then he talks about again, the genius of the fewest moving parts. It's really hard to scale something that's complex. So he says scale has value in itself. For example, the same computer that controls a tiny rocket controls the big rocket. The percentage of weight of the electronics is significant in a small rocket, but becomes vanishingly small in a big one. Well, another thing you do a good job in the book of is you give multiple examples of the same idea. And again, all these ideas relate to each other. And so he talks about like why did they move remove the landing legs? I think this is a Starship 3. Uh and he says again, here we try to think to the limit of physics. The problem with landing legs is they add mass. We have to protect them during re-entry and we have to get a giant rocket from wherever it landed back onto the launch stand. That is tricky. I was trying to think of the limit. What's the fastest way to achieve reusability? It would be to land on the launch stand. So, he talks about, you know, planes land and then they immediately take off again. That's what we're going to do with rockets. It would be to land on the launch stand. Why not just have it land on the arms of the tower it launches from? So, again, which is a crazy thing. When we talked about it first, it sounded batshit crazy. To direct quote from Elon, "To custom build a giant tower to catch the heaviest flying object ever made with mechanical arms. Pluck it out of the air, but we did it. It is an epic sight. Giant robot arms catching a giant rocket." I think the book that you wrote is really important. What I want to do is I'm going to buy a thousand copies. Uh I will leave a link down in the show notes. So, maybe the first thousand people that click that link, I'll buy a a copy of the book for them cuz I do think like what you're doing is like think about how crazy it is. Elon has a 35-year career as an entrepreneur so far or something around around that way. You spent five years and thousands of hours distilling the way he thinks about building companies and products and new technologies into a book somebody can read in five hours, 10 hours. Like that is insanely valuable. I do want to end our conversation with what I think is most important to you and I and what we're both trying to do with work. This entire reason I'm doing this new show is like a celebration of capitalism. It is a love letter to capitalism. It is, hey, you know what? If you want a role model, how about somebody that started a company that built a product maybe somebody else has liked better. That created wealth for their their their their employees. That had to create jobs. They created wealth for themselves and their family. Like these things should be applauded. And it's exactly what Elon says here. So, I want to close here. He says, "It is insanely hard to build and ship useful products to a large number of people. There's a hell of a lot of difference between a company that has shipped a product and one that hasn't. It is night and day. If you create great products and services which create wealth, that should be applauded. You increase the standard of living of the country and perhaps the world." Thanks for writing the book. Thanks for taking the time to have this conversation. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast Founders. For almost a decade, I have obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

エリック#190

呼んでくれてありがとう。光栄だ。

---

EN

I want to jump to something else that you and I have talked about a bunch, which is your one of your goals, stated goals for making this is like you want to encourage more people to make stuff. So, you actually make products, services that make other people's lives better. I talked to Tobi Lütke on this podcast, which was one of my favorite conversations I've ever had in my entire life. It was very interesting. I didn't even think about it in these terms. At the end of the conversation, he's like, "Oh, me and you actually have the same job. Our job is to increase entrepreneurs, to create more entrepreneurs." He's doing it through Shopify. I'm obviously doing it through reading all these biographies, taking this collective knowledge of history's greatest entrepreneurs, and pushing it uh to down like the generations. So, in in in many cases, I do think there's going to be people that pick up your book and your series of books and be like, "Wait, I I can like do something, too." And take these ideas and apply it, even if it's in a small way. This section, there's only two pages here. It's like page and a half. I think it's really important. I highlighted almost the whole thing. But it's like these are again, these are Elon's words that are super important. He says, "We must make stuff. Manufacturing is underrated. It is hard. I've got mad respect for the makers of things." That's my favorite sentence on this book, or in on this page. He says, "And this is why it's important. Some people have an absurd view of the economy as a magic thing that just produces stuff. Let me break it to the fools out there. If we don't make stuff, there's no stuff. Some people have become detached from reality. This notion that the government can just send out checks to everybody and everything will be fine is not true, obviously. You can't just legislate money to solve things. If we don't make stuff, he says again, there is no stuff. Technological progress is not inevitable. It's not some kind of abstract concept. Humans make technology. If we don't do it, it will not happen. Somebody has to do the real work. Say more. Yuan has both uh hard and really positive motivations. Like he burns clean fuel and dirty fuel at the same time, right? Like yes, he's like trying to escape this really hard childhood he had and like prove to himself that he has this incredible value, but he also has these like really beautiful massive aspirations. And he's inspiring so many people to do great work and helping them learn how to do it in the most effective way. Like he's raising and educating this whole culture, all these entrepreneurs who are going to come out of these companies. We're already seeing SpaceX founders do incredible things. And the intensity and pace and vision that these people are working with, I think it's going to usher in like an incredible next generation of entrepreneurs. And I I hope this book like helps people gain these ideas into their head and choose what they think is important and what they work on and who they work on it with and how they work on it. Yeah. Yeah. Going back to the the kind of like founders archive in your head, like how many of the great founders were making things, manufacturing, building, moving physical stuff around? [laughter] The closest analog for Elon is is are those names. Like I don't think there's anybody else. Going back to like why he's singular, like we would have social networks without Mark Zuckerberg. We'd have search engines without Google. We would have operating systems without Bill Gates. Like yes, they're some of the biggest companies on Earth, but and they were incredibly well executed, but I don't think they were singular and I don't think we're going to see quite the same longevity that we see out of like both of these companies. Yeah, I mean, Tesla is building a lot of things in the United US and now working backwards into their own supply chain. Like they can't get enough lithium, so starting a lithium refinery in the United States. Spinning up they're now, you know, starting to fabricate their own chips because that's become a bottleneck. Like they just keep attacking like up and down the supply chain as much as they can. Um in order to be as efficient as possible and drive the product cost down. Yep. [laughter] Yeah. That was an outcome of his uh his Zip2 experience where he was like he was building software and then selling it to legacy media companies to kind of move newspapers online like way back in the day. And he was just super frustrated by having to like sell to a slow-moving old-school company that was between him and customers. And that's where he came kind of There was an early lesson that he's carried with him forever which is like go straight to the consumer. Like own everything and let the the customer is the one who's going to make the final determination. Like you want to take the technology straight to the customer. Also the PayPal thing, like make the decisions as quickly as possible and then just like keep moving. Like the back to like velocity, speed is everything. He's a competitive guy. Like loves loves to win. We are lucky that he's working on the things that he's working on. His inherent personality would dominate whatever industry he went into. And how lucky are we that he's like working on some of the most important problems that humanity faces. Yeah. [laughter] I mean, which goes back to like the incentive system. Like you know, thank God for capitalism. Like Napoleon didn't do a lot of good with his like massive energy and brilliance, right? He like won a lot of land, lost a lot of land, a lot of people died. I have not. Yeah. Yeah. Uh and There's actually a great story that I think is a really replicable tactic that's underrated that I I I think people can really use actually, which is when he was considering starting SpaceX. So, this is after he sort of had his his like bad experience in Russia and he's thinking about entering the launch market. He doesn't just say like, "I'm starting a company." What he does is do he goes through a feasibility study. So, he pulls in a bunch of engineers that have worked on the great launch vehicles. He starts reading all the books as you say like devouring the entire shelf, talking to all the people that he can, and he sets up a series of meetings with these engineers who are experienced to basically vet the idea of how good could launch be. Let's start with first principles. Let's start with a clean sheet of paper and what's possible in this market. And almost at the same time that say they sort of came to the conclusion through this work that like massive order of magnitude breakthroughs were possible was when they actually sold PayPal. And so, he's kind of like, "All right, I got a bunch of cash. We've like vetted this idea with these experts, but I think it's really worth drilling down on the fact that like, you know, at this point he was almost 30 if not more. He had only worked in software. He studied physics in undergrad, but like had not built hardware, and he just learned how to become a rocket scientist essentially just by like reading the books, talking to people, and going after and he says most people self-limit their ability to learn. Like I'd never studied rocket science, but I picked it up along the way. He's a powerful example of like what is possible, you know, once you identify a meaningful mission, you just become who you need to be in order to accomplish that mission. I mean, that was the press, but also his friends. Like I'm sure that many of them would deny it now, but they were all trying to talk him out of it. There's only a graveyard in this particular place. People were like showing him rocket videos who It's not that nobody had ever attempted this before. It's just everybody had failed. Yeah. It was actually a big motivation of Beal is like, "Even if I fail, even if I lose this money, and that is the most likely outcome, not just by a little, like by a lot." He's like, "I will have moved the ball forward." Like this is an important mission, and going in with the idea that he'll burn this money on the Mars mission. He's like, "Even if I waste my money on advancing progress in space launch technology, at least I will have made progress in the same way that like Andy Beal, you know, left some infrastructure behind that helped SpaceX." Like these things do build and compound, and there's, you know, back to the sort of fragility sense, like even when entrepreneurs fail trying to move the ball forward, this the ecosystem like moves forward. Like, that's part of the beauty of the human system that we have. [laughter] You think he's doing that right now? So, as I'm here listening to you talk, I'm just like leafing through the book to see what other interesting stuff comes. What you said just matches up perfectly with the subheading of the page I just happened to randomly turn to, which is called the edge of sanity. I just need to read some of the stuff to you cuz he's hilarious. Yeah. Question, how do you prioritize with so many things going on at once? He goes, "Prioritizing has usually been out of desperation, not selection. It's not, 'Oh, let's sit back and leisurely decide how we should spend these resources.' It's, 'This isn't working. If we don't make it work, we're going to go bankrupt, so we better make it work.'" And then he goes, "I felt I felt like Indiana Jones running down the temple. There's a huge boulder chasing you, and you need to jump across a giant pit in the ground. If you slow down, the boulder will crush you, and if you don't make the leap, you'll die in the pit. That's prioritizing." It is how scaled entrepreneurs feel. Like when when you interviewed Brian Armstrong, that is how it sounded. You know, he's like we hit product market fit and all I could do for years was just wake up and like stay alive. Just try to keep up. Like the servers were on fire, the support tickets were coming in. Like, oh my god, I just have to stay on top of it. Like I just got to keep running and jump across the pit. Yeah. It's funny to me. I lived in the factories for 3 years. Talking about the Tesla production hell. Uh I lived in the factories for 3 years. Running around like a maniac through every part of the factory. I was living with the team. I slept on the floor. This is actually smart. I slept on the floor floor so the team going through a hard time could see me on the floor and knew I was not in some ivory tower. Whatever pain they experienced, I experienced more. Talulah Riley was his wife at the time of that suffering. So she's seeing this They're in bed. He's trying to sleep and he's usually yelling in his sleep and And a direct quote from him on the page I just flipped to, I worked to the edge of sanity. know who and some people are Elon Musk. Yeah, No, but but people can probably take more than they're currently taking. Like it also I think it's a it's an antidote to envy. Like I don't want to live through what he lived through and that makes it very easy to be like I I don't I want to compete with that. Um but it does show you what's possible. Like that's what maximum effort really looks like. I think that's a really helpful lesson to know. Yep. You can't make two orders of magnitude improvements if you rely on the existing supply chain. And And one of the things we we're talking about this morning is like the most interesting thing is identify the limiting factor work on the bottleneck is like almost so obvious that it's trite, right? Like One, people don't do it, but two, it's a more nuanced thing than it appears at first blush, right? Like if the limiting factor is energy, it's like, "Okay, what is the What is the peak load? Where does it come from? What's the cost optimized thing?" Like, "Oh, if If turbines are the cheapest way to do it, what is the actual like who's manufacturing the turbines? Where do they come from? Where do they exist?" Um if the piece What piece of the turbine makes it more difficult? So, he did this example and drilled all the way down and he's like, "There's actually one like machine part that is the fin of the turbine that is the like portable piece of uh the generator that is the bottleneck of compute infrastructure for xAI right now." And so, he's like, "It's actually one part of a thing drilling all the way down and like identifying with super high specificity what the bottleneck is." Yeah. And the limiting factor is energy, right? Like we we we bought the chips, we need the building. This is when he was running the first supercluster. And somebody told him it was going to take like 2 years to get this building up and running. He's like, "Nope. If we don't do it, there's a breakpoint. If we don't do it in 90 days, like we're dead. Six months maybe, we're dead." And they spun up the whole thing. They They found a building in Memphis. They bought the chips from Nvidia. Then they needed cooling and they needed uh power. You can't get a grid interconnect done in 6 months. So, what do you do? You go get these turbines, these gas turbines, which are like portable energy generators, and you you you just line them up all along one side of the building. And you can't get that much cooling installed. So, he went and hired mobile like refrigerator trucks to like line them up against the other side of the building. Um, it's it's just like what is the fastest possible way to get this thing done? And what's the limiting factor of the limiting factor of the limiting factor? Like drilling all the way down to figure out truly where to attack. That kind of five whys all the way down to figure out the limiting factor of the limiting factor of the limiting factor. Yeah. Yeah. I think Elon is underrated in his design sense, actually. Like um, there's a lot of times when you you hear Elon quotes that sound exactly like Steve Jobs would have said. There's an important piece of the design, in particular for cars. Um, and a lot of the he thinks about it like an algorithm, right? Like there's certain specific things ratios that have to exist between the product or it needs to feel bigger on the inside than it looks on the outside. Um, that he just absolutely insists on. And there's stories especially from early Tesla of him being like unreasonable about design decisions that he's just puts a finger on it. He's like, it has to be this way or it's not good enough. It's not beautiful enough. It's not aesthetic enough. Um, in the same way that Steve Jobs was very much like, no, put a handle on that computer because it changes the relationship that somebody has with this like kind of new foreign machine. easily forgotten truth. Like, Tesla doesn't advertise. They just all the money back into the product or all the money back into the next product. There's stories about uh the rift between him and his cousins doing SolarCity, because SolarCity was a very like sales-driven organization. They're like door-to-door sales. They weren't as focused on product differentiation, and he just like he was on the board, and he just came in like a maniac on their product. And he's like, "Why do these clips exist? Why do these roofs take so long to install? Why are they so expensive to install?" And he was like adopting that super Steve Jobs like make a beautiful product, make it an obviously better thing. Um get rid of these sales people. Like, I don't want this to be I don't want the organization to be better at selling a mediocre product. I want it to be better at creating an excellent product that sells itself. That is his whole ethos. Yeah, which this is the same logic that he applies to factories, right? Like the the inherent value of scale just make something extremely big and diminish the fixed costs as much as you can and the value of volume, like making these leaps between, you know, that's why they started with sports car because you can have like a unit profitable thing at small volume, then the Model S, then the Model 3. The same thing he's doing with the rockets, right? Falcon 1 to Falcon 9. Um the the ability to sequence the strategy through different products at different escalators and have it be profitable the at each sort of stable equilibrium is a really important piece that I think for all the talk about how he's like a visionary and builds these great products, he's still really economical about how he goes about it, which I think is very um very overrated or underrated piece of his genius. Mhm. That is a great story because it exemplifies a few different things, right? There's the thinking in limits part, like what is the platonic ideal? How good could it be if we were just dreaming? And then it seemed impossible. And he's got a really, um, specific tactic he does when he's when he's exploring. He says, "What's possible within the absurd?" And so, he takes these crazy ideas and throws them out and people are like, "That's crazy. That wouldn't work. That would be absurd." And he asks, "What would it take? Don't tell me no. Tell me what would have to be true. What would it take to make it possible?" What he finds, and what they're this comes up over and over again in his stories, is what first seems impossible, and people push back, and he sort of gives it like a day. Um, and then people start to like churn on it a little bit. And then he asks more questions, questions more assumptions, asks what it would take again. And then like within a week, people start to be like, "Wait a minute, this might be possible." Um, and any I think he's been through this loop enough times where people are like, "No, that's crazy." They dismiss it. He pushes back. He says, "What would it take?" He says, "Do the brainstorm." He says, "Just spend a day or spend a week designing it. Just assume that it's possible and start working on it. Let's see how far you can get." And so many times he's like, what seems impossible he'll be there's no fundamental law of physics reason why this is impossible. And I think all of this actually goes back to his belief that like engineering is magic and the laws of physics are the limit of the magic. And so, not analogy, not what have we designed before, not what problems have already been solved, not what do our current methods let us achieve, but like what is the limit of what's theoretically possible and he's just going to be unreasonable in pushing as far as he can towards that. And he's seen over and over again that when he holds that line and asks what would it take and says, keep trying. I know it's hard, keep trying. You've just got to muscle through. There's I there's no reason this isn't possible. Show me why it's impossible or keep working on it. And people respond to those pushes and do achieve things that seem impossible over and over again. Thank you for having me. I'm honored.

FAQ

なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは?

このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。

- 動画: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdBcZSau5iA - 公式: https://www.davidsenra.com - 関連: https://colossus.com/episode/415-how-elon-thinks/ - 書籍: https://www.elonmuskbook.org/

公式サイト・Colossus にはエピソード要約・ショーノートはありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは前提にしていません。

自動字幕の精度は? どこが壊れやすい?

インタビュー2人で比較的クリアですが、固有名詞・会社名・技術用語・早口・罵倒語マスクで崩れます。

| 字幕に出やすい崩れ | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | The Book of Elon / useful ideas | The Book of Elon(Eric Jorgenson) | | Isaacson / Ashley Vance | Walter Isaacson / Ashlee Vance 伝記 | | Max Olson / tip of the spear | Max Olson の SpaceX エッセイ・ミーム | | Raptor / Starship / Falcon 9 | SpaceX エンジン・機体・ロケット | | Marchenko / Starlink | SpaceX 初期人材・衛星コンステ | | idiot index | イディオット・インデックス(材料コスト比) | | Omni latch / McMaster-Carr | 要件を疑った既製品ラッチの例 | | SR-71 Blackbird | 速度=防御の比喩 | | Talulah Riley | 当時の配偶者(2008年のエピソード) | | Bending Spoons / Luca Ferrari | 採用・キャパ飽和の話題 | | Apploven / axon / Deal / deel | AppLovin / AxonDeel(スポンサー) | | banana man / fish that ate the whale | 『The Fish That Ate the Whale』(Rich Cohen) | | Diagoras / Atlas Shrugged | 『Atlas Shrugged』 内面化責任の話 |

日本語本文では多くを修正済み。英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、引用の一次ソースは動画を優先してください。

日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している?

していません。 日本語は読みやすさのためまとめ・整文。英語は字幕切れ目が細かい。話者(センラ/エリック)を手がかりに話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。スポンサー読み上げ(Ramp、Deel、AppLovin/Axon、HubSpot)は日本語から省略しています。

上部トグルは何のため?

- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け(英語は約9.5px) - 英語を少し大きく … 対照精読用(約11px)

デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」。

Eric Jorgenson / 『The Book of Elon』とは?

Eric Jorgenson(エリック・ヨーゲンソン) はライター/ビルダー/投資家。『The Almanack of Naval Ravikant』などの編著で知られ、本エピソードでは 『The Book of Elon: Elon Musk's most useful ideas in his own words』 の著者として登場。イーロンの発言・著作・伝記などを長年・数千時間かけて読み、有用なアイデアを本人の言葉中心に蒸留した「対話型ハンドブック」として設計されている、と語られる。

先行コピーは世界にごく少数(会話上: Naval Ravikant、MrBeast、Ivanka Trump、David Senra)と紹介される。数字・配布先は口頭ベース

David Senra(センラ)とは?

起業家伝記を扱う Founders ポッドキャストで知られるホスト。本番組では創業者・著者インタビューを行う。イーロン関連では複数エピソード(Isaacson 伝、How Elon Works 等)を既に作っており、「歴史的類似が見つからない特異な起業家」として位置づける。本編終盤では番組を「資本主義へのラブレター」と位置づける。

「アルゴリズム」五ステップとは?

本編で繰り返し中心になる、イーロンが会議で口にするほど反復するフレームワーク(会話上の整理):

1. 要件を疑う(Make requirements less dumb)— 存在すべきでないものを最適化しない 2. 削除・削除・削除 — 最良の部品は部品がない/最良のプロセスはプロセスがない 3. 単純化・最適化 — 要件と存在が確定してから。要件には個人名の説明責任 4. 加速 — 正しい方向に効率よく動いているなら遅すぎる。先に1–3をやれ 5. 自動化 — 最後。自動化自体が高コストで適応しにくい

Tesla の過剰自動化失敗や Starlink の壁ルーム立て直しが、順序の重要性の例として語られる。

「槍の穂先」「フラッシュモブ」とは?

Max Olson の SpaceX 関連エッセイで整理される文化ミームのひとつ。常に最大の制約(リミッター)に集中し、二次問題に散らさない。NASA 訪問者が見た「問題が出ると廊下にフラッシュモブが現れる」描写と、定期会議を無限に続けない運用が対比される。

船を燃やす/2億ドルのオールインとは?

2008年前後の谷で、他者に資金を頼む前に 自分の資金(会話上約2億ドル規模)を Tesla / SpaceX に入れた、という文脈。九桁の純資産に達したあとゼロと公的屈辱を賭ける起業家は稀、と語られる。プランBは「プランAを通すこと」(Bezos 引用)と接続。数字は口頭・伝記ベースで、会計上の正確な内訳は一次資料を確認。

イディオット・インデックス/垂直統合とは?

材料のコモディティ価格に対して完成品コストが異常に高いとき、その差(中間の請負・オーバーヘッド)を問題視する感覚。ロケットコストの大部分が材料ではなく階層化した請負にある、という気づき。コストプラス契約の寡占インセンティブ(できるだけ使う)に対し、アウトカムベース契約とコスト削減インセンティブを取りに行った、と語られる。

垂直統合の理由は哲学というより 必要な速度がレガシーサプライチェーンより速いこと。レガシーに頼るほど速度・コスト・技術の制約を相続する。

第一原理・ステンレス・鋳造・塔でロケットを掴むとは?

- ステンレス Starship: カーボンより扱いやすく安く、低温で強度が増す直感。駐車場のテント溶接、など - 一体鋳造: 玩具の車から着想。大型鋳造機メーカーの「Maybe」を Yes と取る - 発射塔の腕でキャッチ: 着陸脚の質量・保護・回収を避け、再使用の限界形として「発射台に着地」。不可能に見えたが「不条理の範囲で何が要るか」と押し続けた例

採用・失敗・締め切りのマインドセットは?

- 例外的能力の証拠・過去に解いた難しい技術問題の詳細質問 - 若く未証明のエンジニアに大きな責任(戦時のスキップ昇進) - 「やらかした四つのやり方を言えないなら本当の仕事をしていない」 - 締め切りは 50%で間に合う 設定。100%達成なら遠すぎる - 削除したうち 約10%を戻していないなら削り不足 - 失敗は壊滅的でなければ本質的に無関係。スケール前に多く失敗して最適設計を知る

時間・速度・SR-71・金の考え方は?

- 唯一の真の通貨は時間。設備や金は捨ててよいが時間は捨てるな - 速度は攻撃でも防御でもある(SR-71 は加速以外の防御がほぼなく、数千発のミサイルでも撃墜されず) - 二倍速の工場は実質もう一つの工場 - 早期 SpaceX: 一日バーン 約10万ドル vs 10年後の想定一日売上 約1000万ドル → 一日遅延の機会費用 - 2.5万の部品は拒否しても、一日を救う 6万ドルのジェット燃料は使う、という一見矛盾の解消 - 財務とエンジニアリングが 同じ頭にあるから速い - チームは ベクトル和(質×速度×方向の揃え)

「100万人のマスク」/ものを作れ、とは?

著者の本の目標のひとつは、人生の青写真のコピーではなく、誰もやっていない有用な問題に人生を捧げる人を増やすこと。「栄光ではなく仕事・有用さを目指せ」「ものを作らなければものはない」「金融・法への才能過剰配分を減らし、作る人を増やせ」。Tobi Lütke(Shopify)とセンラの「起業家を増やす仕事」と接続される。

幼少期・不利の話は?

特権神話への反論として、父の虐待的・操作的・強迫的嘘、いじめ後の父の側について、カナダ移民・学費自弁・学生ローン・YMCAシャワー・Zip2売却後すぐ x.com へ再投資、などが語られる。伝記(Isaacson 等)と本人・家族の証言ベースの会話上の整理であり、心理・家族史の確定診断ではない。

xAI・Memphis・タービンの話は?

最初のスーパークラスタ文脈で、建物立ち上げに「二年」と言われたのを 90日〜半年の生死ラインで拒否。建物・Nvidiaチップ・グリッド接続が間に合わない制約に対し、ガスタービンを並べる/冷蔵トラックで冷却など、制約の制約までドリルダウンして最短経路を取る例として語られる。時期・規模の数字は口頭。

スポンサー読み上げはなぜない?

学習用日本語対話では Ramp / Deel / AppLovin(Axon)/ HubSpot などのスポンサー枠を省略しています。英語自動字幕側には残っているため、日英を並べると英語だけ長い区間が出ることがあります。

対話本文・関連ファイルは?

- 対話本文: article-ja.md - 見た目: article-ja.html - 日英対照: article-bilingual.md - FAQ: FAQ-ja.md - メタ: meta.json(slug: how-elon-thinks