David Senra · JA + tiny EN

唯一の競合はコストだ——ジェイソン・フリード

Jason Fried: Your Only Competition Is Your Costs

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラフリード
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

昨夜話してくれたことから始めたい。君にとってプロダクトを作る最良の方法は、自分が本当の顧客であること——自分が使いたいものを作ることだ、と。

EN

I want to start with what you told me last night that you feel the best way to make a product or the best way to make a product for you is by you are the actual customer. You are making the products that you want to use. Yeah. I don't know how to do it any other way. Like I this is how I've always done it. So back when I was 15 16 I started in software making stuff actually something called FileMaker Pro which is like way back when you can make these databases for yourself. And I I made this database to keep track of my music collection because I was loaning out tapes and CDs to friends and never getting them back. So I'm like, I need a way to keep track of this stuff cuz I keep losing these things. So I made this product which I eventually called audio file, but I made it for myself. It was just this this database, right? And I made a nice interface cuz I liked art. I like making stuff. And so I made this thing and uh I I eventually just decided that like I'll put a little text file in this in this archive of the software that said if you like this, send me 20 bucks. And I put up on AOL. So this is like pre- internet, right? Put up on AOL. And I got this envelope, actually an air mail envelope, the one of those with like the red and blue check marks, like old school like envelope from and it's from Germany. And I opened it up and someone had printed out this this piece of paper. Uh which was the thing I included with the software and gave me a $20 crisp US bill, right? And that was the moment I think I all clicked for me, which is make stuff for yourself. There's probably other people out there like you who want what you want and make it available to sell. So, you are the customer. You are the audience. It's you, you, you. And then there'll be other people just like you. We're not all that unique. There's plenty of people who like what we like, plenty of people who don't, and there's plenty of products for them, too. But there's enough that like what you like. And so, that's why I got started.

フリード#2

他のやり方を知らない。ずっとそうしてきた。15・16歳のころ、FileMaker Pro でソフトを作り始めた。自分用のデータベースが作れる時代だ。音楽コレクションを管理するDBを作った。テープやCDを友人に貸して返ってこないから、追跡が必要だった。

EN

Yeah. You have this this interesting idea where if you're just making what you want, right? Doesn't matter. You just have to go and collect more people that like the things that you like and kind of ignore the people that don't. Yes. And this is all tied into like keeping your cost low. So, you know, you if you have a lot of cost, high cost, big company, you have to find a lot of people like you. But if you keep your cost low, keep your company small. At the time, it was just me, you know, when I was doing the software thing. And I was making like, I don't know, 20 grand a year like selling software as a solo person when I was like 16 years old or something out of that or 17. Then I went to college a little bit as well. And it's like that's an amazing little small side business, a huge side business when you're that age, right? Because I had no expenses. And so so it's easy. I only had to find like, you know, a few thousand people to to pay me that money, 20 bucks, right, to to to get that eventually. But if I had a big business and I had a lot of people, a lot of overhead, I'd have to find a lot of people like me, and that's harder. So the whole game for me is to make things as simple as possible, as easy for me as possible. So keep your cost low, keep your company as small as you possibly can and make great stuff and then you don't have to find as many people just like you. But the ones you find really love what you do and that's like that's enough. Like that is enough. You can stop there, keep doing stuff, but you can kind of stop there conceptually and go I'm going to make stuff for me, people like me. I don't need the whole world to like what I like. I need like enough of a small world to like what I like. And we're we're golden.

フリード#3

最終的に Audiofile と呼んだが、最初は自分用だった。アートが好きで、きれいなUIも作った。アーカイブにテキストファイルを入れて「気に入ったら20ドル送って」と書き、AOLに上げた。まだインターネット前夜の話だ。

EN

Yeah. It's your only competition. Explain that.

フリード#4

ある日、ドイツからエアメールが届いた。赤と青のチェック柄の古い封筒。中には印刷した紙と、パリッとした20ドル札。そこで全部がつながった。自分のために作る。同じものを欲しがる人がきっといる。売れるように公開する。

EN

Yeah.

フリード#5

顧客は自分、観客も自分。自分・自分・自分。すると同じような人が現れる。人間はそれほどユニークじゃない。好きな人は十分いる。嫌いな人にも別のプロダクトがある。だから始めた。

EN

It's like Bill Gates the first one of the most interesting stories was that the first 30 it's probably the most successful arguably the most successful software company to get to a billion dollars in sales of just pure software in a year. But the first 30 uh employees of Microsoft were Bill Gates, his secretary, and 28 programmers. There's no there was no fat at all. No fat.

センラ#6

自分が欲しいものだけ作るなら、同じ好みの人を集め、違う人は無視すればいい、という考え方だね。

EN

That's something you talk about a lot. Can you talk about your the importance of keeping cost low, small teams, and then you want essentially like no fat anywhere?

フリード#7

はい。そしてコストを低く保つことと一体だ。コストが高く大きな会社なら、同じ好みの人を大量に見つけなければならない。コストを低く、会社を小さく保てば——当時は自分一人——16・17歳で年に2万ドルくらい売れた。経費ゼロだから、数千人が20ドル払ってくれれば十分だった。

EN

We had 62 people at at 37 Signals, and we've gotten as high as I think 80 at some point, and then we're about 63 or 62 right now, which is a feels really good. Um, but we also built a lot of things when we were much smaller. We had like 12 people way back in the day or four people way back in the way way way days when we started out. So, I've always been comfortable with small teams. I think that small teams work better, are better. There's fewer there's less room for miscommunication because I don't think companies really have communication problems. They miscommunication problems. Like when you have too many people and too many layers and someone misses this and someone has to repeat something that happened. Like I want to avoid all of that. get rid of all the things that get in the way of making good stuff. And I actually think too many people get in the way often times and you actually end up making worse stuff the more people who are involved. So we just try to keep the team small. Any team we have making something is usually two people. Like two people working on a feature, one programmer, one designer. That's pretty much it. Sometimes someone else will come in here and there, but for the most part it's two people. And it also keeps us honest. It prevents us from making things that we can't make with two people. So it just keeps everything tight and simple and clear and you just keep parlaying that. Keep adding that stuff up and you end up with a very tight product with a small surface area that's you can see the whole thing. You can hold the whole thing. You know how it all works. Your customers can see the whole thing and hold the whole thing and know how it works. And that's all people want. People don't want complicated stuff. They don't want software that's full of things they don't use. People will sometimes buy things like that because they're sold things like that, but when it really comes down to it, that's not what they actually want. And people who buy software, who buy our software, are the people who use the product. A lot of enterprise companies sell software to a buyer who then makes other people use the product and everyone hates those products. But people who use our products, buy our products, and it's the same person. So, they're looking for stuff that just works really well. I've just found there's no better way to do that than to keep the company small and tight. And and that that that goes everywhere. like we don't have any middle management. Um we've tried a little bit. We've had that's why we had 83 people at one point. We hired a few more people to build out a little bit of a team and then pulled back from that and go we don't that wasn't helpful.

フリード#8

ゲームは、できるだけ単純に、自分にとって簡単にすること。コストを低く、会社をできるだけ小さく、良いものを作る。同じ好みの人をたくさん探す必要がなくなる。見つけた人は本当に好きになってくれる。それで足りる。世界中に好かれる必要はない。小さな世界で十分好きでもらえれば、もう勝ちだ。

EN

But there's two people on the executive team, me and David, my business partner. That's that's it. We've had a COO for a while. They were fine. They were good people. We just didn't there wasn't enough work for them, frankly, to to do the work. So they were doing things that they didn't need to really do. And then when you do stuff you don't really need to do, you feel bad for them in a sense because they're like wasting their professional life doing things they don't really want to do that doesn't need to get done. So that doesn't feel good. Um we've had like engineering managers and we found out again that there was like too many levels in between David who's the CTO and the people doing the work. He had to like talk to someone else who talked to someone else and it's like a game of telephone. Things are lost in translation along the way. So you just we we tried those things. We had some thoughts that maybe this would be a better thing for us to do and we turned out it it turned out not to be a better thing to do. How long does it take you to realize a year?

センラ#9

君の言い方は面白い。「本当の競合はコストだ」。それが決まり文句?

EN

Okay.

フリード#10

唯一の競合だ、と言っている。

EN

Basically COO roles were longer. They were three years. We tried it twice. For the most part, we give everybody about a year to prove themselves at 37 Signals. And so we hire somebody and they have about a year until we decide if we're going to hire them again. That's how I think of the second year. It's a rehire. It's not like a performance review where we look at numbers and it's like one simple question. I always try to like if I can I always try to boil everything down to a question that answers all the other questions. So the question we ask after the first year with any new employee is knowing what I know now would I hire them again? And that answers pretty much every question. Answers every question about performance, about attitude, culture, fit, all the stuff. If I know what I know now, would I hire them again? And so it turned out with the management stuff, we're like it wasn't even about the people, it was more like now that we know what we know now, would we create this position again? And the answer was no. So we eliminated those positions and never rehired for them. So that's how we kind of got back a little bit to to a smaller size.

センラ#11

説明して。

EN

Does that work with products too or features of products?

フリード#12

ビジネスは単純だ。使うより多く稼ぐ。それだけだ。借り続けてもいずれ使った以上を稼がなきゃいけない。使ったより多く稼いでいるなら、競合はコストだ。事業を続けるためにいくらかかるか、それと戦っている。市場の他の代替品ではない。それらは存在するし現実だが、コントロールできない。

EN

It can. It's harder. You roll back people. You roll back entire products. Do you ever roll back features?

フリード#13

彼らが何を出し、いくらで売るかは彼らが決める。コントロールできるのは、事業にかかるコストと、自分の売値だ。使うより多く稼いでいる限り、事業を続けられる。結局それがすべてだ。続けたいから。好きだから。続けられないなら作れない。毎年の本当の競合は、「会社として使うより多く稼ぐ」ことだけだ。

EN

Do you write it from scratch?

センラ#14

Foundersでも何度も言う。歴史上の偉大な起業家は——サム・ウォルトン、初期のスティーブ・ジョブズ、カーネギー、ロックフェラー——みんなコストに執着している。だからコスト管理のRampと組んでいる。でもソフト会社は莫大なマージンがあっても赤字になれる、という話もしていた。

EN

We have in the past. So from from base camp 1 to base camp 2 was a total rewrite. From two to three was a total rewrite. 3 to four was not and four to five which we're working on now is not. But it's a chance to revisit a lot of fundamental assumptions about what the product does and how it works. And I'm always trying to make I'm trying to buck the trend, right? human nature is is about expansion typically. Like things tend to expand, but in the physical world, there's also like limits that push back on those expansions. Like if this mug was burning hot, like we would know that's a bad design. If if this handle if there's no handle here and I had to hold it this way, uh maybe not a good mug. Like there's there's physics here. Like you look at this if this thing was made of of a really really fragile material or something that would like melt if it got wet, you'd be like that's a bad design. like there's some things that are telling you this is a bad design. In software, you don't get that. Software can be anything. It's infinitely malleable. And what ends up happening is because there's nothing pushing back, it just expands forever and gets worse. Software slides downhill. It gets better for a while then slides downhill. So, I'm conscious of that and I'm always trying to make sure that every new version we make of something is a little bit simpler in the fundamental ways than the previous version. It might have more features, but the experience hopefully is simpler. That's like the big challenge and actually the frankly like the most fun part of of of building products over the long term is can we buck the trend of having them slide downhill and instead like maintain and make them even better over time.

センラ#15

若い創業者にはマイクロソフト初期を見ろと言う。年に純ソフトで10億ドル売上に到達した、おそらく最も成功したソフト会社のひとつ。最初の30人はビル・ゲイツ、秘書、プログラマー28人。贅肉ゼロ。

EN

It's hard. And that's fun. It's a bit of a puzzle. It's a bit of pushing back against the forces of nature typically, which again would be to expand. It's forcing us to come up with clever solutions to problems. It forces me to understand what something really is and not like what it could be or what I think other people think of it as, but like what is this really trying to do? And it's fun to have these insights. So like my my favorite thing in life, frankly, is to like have an insight. And I don't get to decide when I have them, right? No one does. if you just like have one, right? Maybe it's in the shower, maybe it's whatever. You just have an insight. And it's cool to work on a problem in software and then have an insight about how to make it simpler. And I find that for me, for whatever reason, I bounce into those insights very frequently making software, more so than pretty much anything else I do. So, it's fun to make something new because I get to have more insights into how to make it simpler and better. And that's just like what for whatever reason that that's where they come from, like the shower and the software. A lot of the conversations that Jason and I have are about craft, about the importance of putting your soul into your work and making the best possible product that you can. Our conversations remind me a lot of the conversations I have with my friend Kareem, who's the co-founder and CTO of RAMP. Ramp is the presenting sponsor of this podcast. And Kareem is one of the greatest technical minds working in finance today. Kareem is obsessed with crafting a high quality product and using the latest technology to constantly create better experiences for his customers. RAMP has one of the most talented technical teams in finance and they use rapid, relentless iteration to make their product better every day. In the last year, RAMP has shipped over 300 new features. Ramp is completely committed to using AI to make a better experience for their customers and automate as much of your business's finances as possible. In fact, Kareem just wrote this. AI is all I think about these days. It is our duty to be first movers and push limits so we can make the greatest possible product experience for our customers. Many of the fastest growing and most innovative companies in the world are running their business on ramp. Make sure you go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time and money. Let AI chase your receipts and close your books so you can use your time and energy building great things for your customers. Get started today by going to ramp.com. We we were talking a lot about this conversation I just had with Toby Luke, I know both you and I admire him.

センラ#16

コストを低く、小さなチーム、贅肉なし——君がよく言うことの重要性を話してほしい。

EN

And what I love about Toby that you have in you as well is like when you talk to him, the next response out of his mouth is like not predictable.

フリード#17

37signalsは62人。最高で80人くらいまで行き、今は62・63人くらいで気持ちがいい。もっと小さいときにもたくさん作った。昔は12人、もっと昔は4人。小さなチームにはずっと慣れている。

EN

Yeah. [laughter]

フリード#18

小さなチームの方がうまくいく。誤通信の余地が減る。会社にコミュニケーション問題があるのではなく、誤通信の問題がある。人が多く層が多いと、誰かが聞き逃し、誰かが伝言ゲームになる。良いものを作る邪魔を全部取り除きたい。人が多すぎると、かえって悪いものができることが多い。

EN

Yeah.

フリード#19

何かを作るチームはだいたい2人。機能にプログラマ1人・デザイナー1人。時々誰かが入るが、基本は2人。2人で作れないものは作らない、という正直さも保てる。締まり、単純さ、明確さが積み上がり、表面積の小さなプロダクトになる。全体が見え、抱えられ、仕組みがわかる。顧客も同じだ。

EN

uh you have made you know you have millions of customers over the lifetime of the customer of the business you've made hundreds of millions of dollars and yet you told me that if you ever sell the company you don't want to look at a computer again. [laughter]

フリード#20

人は複雑なものを本当は欲しくない。使わない機能だらけのソフトも買わされることはあるが、本心ではない。うちのソフトは使う人が買う。エンタープライズは買う人と使う人が違い、みんな嫌う製品が多い。使う人と買う人が同じだから、ちゃんと動くものを求める。会社を小さく締める以外に良い方法を知らない。

EN

it's boring to me all that's boring. Okay. There's a million things I want to unpack there. You said a bunch of things. The serial entrepreneurship I want to um hit on because you and I were talking about the conversation I had with John Mackey. Yes. where he was referencing uh some of his friends just love to like start and you're like oh I actually have like this metaphor that I want to start talking about and it is

フリード#21

中間管理職もいない。少し試して、83人まで増えた時期もある。チームを厚くするために雇って、引き戻した。役に立たなかった。

EN

Yeah. And then we'll go back to the fact that you don't like business and that you only like and you're not really important too don't let me forget is you have no sense of envy like I know I know you try not to other people's businesses like I don't think that is an act.

センラ#22

何が嫌だった?

EN

No I I I would not trade my business for anyone's business. In fact, it'd be a downgrade. Anyone's You could pick anyone if any, if you got to decide if you got to decide. You're like, "Jason, would you trade this business?" I No. Any business I wouldn't take. I'd take mine over anyone else's business. So, like I don't have

フリード#23

経営チームは僕とデイビッド(ビジネスパートナー)の2人だけ。COOをしばらく置いた。良い人だったが、正直やるべき仕事が足りなかった。本当に必要ないことをさせ、その人のプロとしての時間を浪費している気がして気分が悪かった。

EN

What is the underlying thought there? It's just like I built the company I want to work at. I built the business I I want to be in. Like, no one else has that. I have that. That's my thing. Now, they have their thing. I have my thing. Like, I love what I've built. It's great. I'm very happy with it and it's a good fit for me. You know, I don't want to wear someone else's clothes. I don't want to do someone else's stuff. I don't want to live up to someone else's expectations. Like, we have ours, we do our thing, we do our thing our way, and that's it. And if if I had to do my thing someone else's way, it would just it'd be a game of charades. And there's a lot of people, I think, playing entrepreneur, I don't want to play entrepreneur.

フリード#24

エンジニアリングマネージャも置いたが、CTOのデイビッドと現場のあいだに層が増え、また伝言ゲームになった。試した。良くなると思った。結果はそうでなかった。

EN

It means a lot of things to me, but but I think there's a lot of people who who This is Let's get into the envelope thing because this is kind of part of that. Okay.

センラ#25

気づくのに1年?

EN

And I remember when I was getting started being an envelope guy. So the envelope to me there's there's this two sides of business basically. There's the envelope and there's the letter. The envelope is the outside the shell. The business the vehicle that holds the letter and the letter is the product or products. I'm a product guy. I love product. That's all I care about. The business side just has to exist to hold the product, right? Like it just that's the vehicle in which the product travels in. But I don't care about the envelope. so much. But there's lots of people, and I remember this early on when I first started my business. I was thinking about the brand and and the business and how big it could be and what how do I describe it and what do I call it? That's all envelope work. That's like all on the outside. And I think there's a number of people, and by the way, it's fine. All this is fine. What I'm getting at is you got to know who you are and what you want out of yourself and what you want to do. And if you're an envelope person, that's fine. If you're a product letter person, that's fine. But you got to know who you are. I know I'm not an envelope person. I don't just want to build shells. that gets filled and then I sell it and build another shell. It gets filled and I sell it and build another shell and gets filled and I sell it. I want to just work on the letter and the the envelope is just the thinnest little thing that needs to be there to hold the letter. I think playing entrepreneur is like spinning up businesses all the time and making all sorts of stuff and giving it a name and giving it a logo and trying to raise money and and coming up with valuations and talking about all this stuff and there's like nothing of substance inside that yet. Maybe there will be, but in a lot of cases there's nothing. There's just losses and and then it's like a ma mad rush to get out at a certain valuation for other people who put money in. Like that's like turning a business into an asset, a financial instrument. It's just not interesting to me. I want to make things. I want to build products and and that's what I do. Again, that's what we do. And just the idea of of a business being a financial instrument is just like it's anathema to me. I it's just kind of it's repellent actually.

フリード#26

COOは長く、3年くらい。2回試した。だいたい誰でも最初の1年で見極める。2年目は「再雇用」だと思っている。数字のパフォーマンスレビューではない。ひとつの質問に落とす。今知っていることを知ったうえで、もう一度雇うか? パフォーマンス、態度、文化、フィット——全部答える。

EN

Why does it need You just use the word thin shell to describe the envelope. Why do you want I want it to be a thin shell.

フリード#27

マネジメント職についても同じで、人の問題というより「今の知識で、この職位をまた作るか?」でノーだった。職位を消し、再採用しなかった。それで少し小さく戻った。

EN

what does that mean?

センラ#28

プロダクトや機能にも同じ?

EN

Well, I would say this. Um the more mass of an object, the more energy it takes to change its direction, right? This is just like this is getting back to basic physics. A thick sh When I think of this stuff and sometimes these metaphors don't perfectly line up, but in my head I think of like a thick business. It's it's hard to change. It's heavy. It's massive. It's it's there's too much distance between it and the customers and it and the product. There's space like right you can imagine like if you just imagine something very thick. This is the thing that matters and you got to go through all this and compress all this down to get to the thing that matters. Like I don't like that. I think the thing that matters should be big and that the rest of it should be as thin as possible. And so that's what we've tried to build at 37 signals. is a very thin business with a thick set of products that are good and solid and real and generate real profits and are real businesses. And then the rest of it is just enough to hold it all together. That's like my vision for business. It's not the only vision. I plenty of people way more successful than me don't see it this way. I don't care. Like this is just how I see it and how I'm sharing it. But and and it's ma mainly just to show people that like you don't have to go big. It doesn't have to be a big thick heavy busy company. It can be very thin and then focus on the product and get to a place where you can find out people like you. Get to this place where enough is enough and then maintain. Another way to think about this for me I always go back to these sort of weird metaphors is like you know there's the hockey stick right chart right that is like unappealing to me. I like more of like a metaphor where it's more like um like a rocket into orbit. So I you got to get off the ground and you got to break free of of gravity, but then there's a point where you actually just want to sit in orbit and sort of maintain. You want to be within a certain range and fluctuate a little bit up, a little bit down, but be in this comfortable place where you're just orbiting. You're not breaking a force anymore. You're not pushing super hard. you're maintaining and and maintaining a level of quality, maintaining a level of enjoyment and just orbiting now. And I think that that's a really wonderful place for businesses to be. But I wouldn't encourage you to be trying to get to orbit year two. You got to be like on the ride up to break free of all the forces that are holding you back. But then you should also find a place where you can settle in in orbit versus people who I think are just busy constantly trying to grow, grow, grow and get as big as they possibly can. And I always say like why? I'm like so what if you if you're massive and you're twice as massive? Like so what? Why? Why? What's that all about? And they may have an answer for you. I I don't I don't I don't know what the answer would be other than like just growing for growth's sake.

フリード#29

ある程度は。難しい。人はロールバックできる。製品全体もロールバックできる。機能を戻すこともある。だいたい5・6年ごとに主力のBasecampを再発明する。

EN

But I I'm a big fan of getting somewhere and then holding. When I think of you, I think one of your maxims that you repeat the the most [clears throat] is that that idea. Like I hear you say so what all the time. So much questions.

センラ#30

ゼロから書き直す?

EN

Explain more about that. Well, you'd have to ask a question. That would be like, so what? I don't know. [laughter] Like, why why grow? I I mean, maybe that's not a good one, but um for example, like

フリード#31

過去にはした。Basecamp 1から2、2から3は全面リライト。3から4はそうではない。今作っている4から5もそうではない。根本的な前提——何をするか、どう動くか——を見直す機会だ。

EN

we're definitely leaving money on the table. I'm sure of it. Like, we don't optimize our pricing. I'm not I'm not testing pricing not constantly. We're not AB testing constantly. I'm I'm certain there's some formula that we're not following that could lead to more growth, more revenue, more whatever, more whatever. And my answer is like, "So what?" Like, I'm very comfortable with where we are. We've got a great business, high margins, very predictable. Um, we make new stuff all the time. We enjoy ourselves. We have a great time. Like, I don't want to … that up. [laughter] I think people … it up all the time. They they you get to the right size and for whatever reason, you can't be content there. And you push a little bit too much, too hard, and you lost what was great about what you were doing. And so this whole thing about there's money on the table and maybe there isn't, maybe there isn't, maybe there's a way to optimize, maybe there isn't. I just it doesn't interest me. So it's so what to that? I don't really care. Tell me if this observation that I have about you is correct.

フリード#32

人間の本性は拡大だ。物理世界には押し返す限界がある。マグカップが焼けたら悪いデザインだとわかる。取っ手がなければ悪い。脆すぎる、濡れたら溶ける——物理が教えてくれる。ソフトにはそれがなく、無限に成形できる。押し返すものがないから永遠に膨らみ、悪化する。ソフトは坂を下る。 しばらく良くなり、それから下る。

EN

Yeah. I don't like optimization.

フリード#33

だから意識している。新しい版は、根本では前版より少し単純であること。機能は増えても体験は単純に。長期でプロダクトを作るいちばん楽しい部分は、坂を下る傾向に逆らい、維持し、さらに良くできるかだ。

EN

I don't even think you think of yourself as a C. And there goes the so what again? [laughter]

センラ#34

なぜそれが楽しい?

EN

You asked for it.

フリード#35

難しいから。パズルだ。自然の力——拡大——に押し返す。賢い解が要る。何かが本当に何なのか、他の人が思う姿ではなく本質を理解する。人生でいちばん好きなのは洞察を得ることだ。いつ来るかは決められない。シャワーかもしれない。ソフトで問題に取り組み、単純にする洞察が来る。他のことよりソフトのほうが頻繁に来る。シャワーとソフト。

---

EN

No, I don't think you could help yourself. I don't think you think of yourself as CEO.

センラ#36

さっきTobi(Lütke)と話した。君も僕も彼を尊敬している。口から出る次の返事が予測できない。相関のない見解も面白い。

EN

I I don't I don't actually even like the term, frankly. Okay. Like executive officer.

センラ#37

君は25歳で会社を始め、27年経営。毎年黒字。生涯で何百万もの顧客、何億ドルも稼いできた。それでも、会社を売ったら二度とコンピュータを見たくない、と言っていた。

EN

chief? Chief executive officer of what? Again, like of what? Like we make decisions. That's what we do. We make decisions. We make products. We hire great people that we like. We find people with zero drama. Like we put together a team. We set out to make things. We take really good care of people, really good care of our customers. We make good products that we really like. great products hopefully, right? Um, I got to leave a little bit of of of room there for some humility. Like, we can always make better products. So, I'm not going to call our products fantastic. They are good. Great. There's always room for for making those better. But, as far as as like being a CEO and whatever that's supposed to mean, I don't know what the hell that means. Yesterday, I answered like 200 emails from my customers. Is that like some people would say that's irresponsible for a CEO to spend their time emailing customers? Like I think it's the best thing you can do,

フリード#38

まず、一貫性には興味がない。文脈がすべてだ。一貫性は面白くない。だから長期計画もしない。行き当たりばったりで作るのが好きだ。ビジネス自体は特に好きではない。自分のビジネスを回すのは好きだ。やり方はわかった。でも別のビジネスを回す? やりたくない。自分のものをもう一つ作るなら、あるいは好きになるかもしれないが、たぶん無理だ。

EN

but I don't think of myself as a CEO.

フリード#39

タイミングとチームと、正しい人・正しい考え・正しい時の産物だ。一からビジネスをやり直すのはノーサンキュー。誰のビジネスとも交換しない。他人の靴に入りたくない。自分のやり方を知っている。それで十分。エゴを撫でて「どこかでもう一度」とやる必要はない。できるとも思わないし、要らない。今あるもので十分という居心地の良さは平和だ。テック業界ではあまり語られない——成長・成長・評価額・またやる、というシリアル起業。

EN

Say it, dude.

センラ#40

全部退屈。

EN

Yeah. But like they need to listen to founders because they're all like this. The the the best entrepreneurs and founders in in history and I think what me and you bond over is exactly that. Like I all I care about is products. I don't care about anything else. I think the way you think of yourself as a designer.

フリード#41

全部退屈だ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#42

解凍したいことが山ほどある。シリアル起業について、John Mackeyとの会話で友人が「立ち上げが好き」と言っていた話と、君の比喩——封筒と手紙——につなげたい。嫉妬がないことも忘れずに。他人のビジネスをうらやまないのは演技じゃない。

EN

Is that correct?

フリード#43

誰のビジネスとも交換しない。むしろダウングレードだ。誰のでもいい、と聞かれてもノー。自分のビジネスの方がいい。

EN

Yes. Uh sure.

センラ#44

根底にある考えは?

EN

Okay.

フリード#45

働きたい会社、入りたい事業を自分で作った。それを持っているのは自分だけだ。彼らには彼らのもの、僕には僕のもの。作ったものが好きで、幸せで、自分に合う。他人の服を着たくない。他人の期待に生きたくない。自分たちのやり方でやる。他人のやり方で自分のやることをやるのは、ただの物真似ゲームだ。起業家を演じる人が多い。僕は演じたくない。

EN

Presumptuous like I I think of it. Yes. Fine.

センラ#46

「起業家を演じる」とは?

EN

You're not a presumptuous person. I didn't mean it that way. I know you didn't.

フリード#47

いろいろあるが、封筒の話に入ろう。ビジネスにはだいたい二面ある。封筒手紙。封筒は外側の殻、手紙を運ぶ乗り物。手紙がプロダクト。僕はプロダクト人間で、プロダクトしか気にしない。ビジネス側は手紙を運ぶために存在するだけ。封筒はあまり気にしない。

EN

Yeah, but when I talk to you, it's like you just design everything in your life.

フリード#48

でも始めたころ、自分もブランドや事業の大きさや説明や名前を考えていた。全部封筒仕事だ。封筒の人でも手紙の人でもいい。ただ自分がどちらかを知ること。僕は封筒の人ではない。殻を立てて中身を詰めて売り、また殻を立てる——それがシリアルに続くのは嫌だ。手紙だけに働きたい。封筒は手紙を包む薄いものだけでいい。

EN

UPS

フリード#49

起業家を演じるとは、事業を次々立ち上げ、名前とロゴをつけ、資金を集め、評価額を語り、中身がまだ薄いことだ。損失と、投資家のために評価額で脱出する狂走。ビジネスを金融商品にすること。反発する。ものを作りたい。プロダクトを建てたい。

EN

actually doing the work for the customer. So I don't think I don't think anybody saying Jeff Bezos I know he he own he's a partner your of yours you know it's a percentage of your company you know he railed about this forever

センラ#50

封筒を「薄い殻」と呼んだ。なぜ薄い方がいい?

EN

and he made every single executive you have to spend a day or a week or a month or whatever it was on customer support. Yeah, we do the same thing. We haven't done that for a bit, but we used to do that. We should do it again actually. We used to have this thing called everyone on support where people would do it for for a day uh rotate through the company. Um mostly so I would do it and so David would do it and now I do it anyway. Um but it's very important I think um you know there there's a there's a there was a when I lived in Chicago, there was a grocery store down the street called Olivia's. There still is. Um, and I got to know the owner. And I appreciated the fact that he got to know his customers personally because they'd walk in the store and he would say hello, right? That's how I got to know him. I don't unfortunately have that opportunity. Like, we have hundreds of thousands of people who use our products. And it's it actually frustrates me that I don't know all of our customers. Like, I could walk past on the street, I could walk past 75 of our customers on a given day and I wouldn't know that. He would know cuz he would know who they are and he knew their family, the whole thing. So, I've always tried as best I can to get as close to I can't get as close to our customers. We have too many of them in that sense. But whenever you sign up for Base Camp, the first thing you see is a letter from me um with my email address, my signature and my email address. And I want my customers to email me. I don't want to hide from anybody. There's no AI, there's no assistant, there's no levels between it all. Just write me. And people do all the time. And we have in our books as well. We have our email address in our books. I want to get as close to pos as possible to the people who use the things that we make. Not just to make them happy because I want to make myself happy, too. We are the first customer of our products, but to understand what they're doing with them, to understand the language they use, how they describe them, who they are. I want to know these things because somehow it permeates me and I and I just I get to feel what it's like to be them and get to understand what it's like for them to use the lever that we've made for them to move something. And there's no other way to do that for me than to just share my email address cuz I don't get to meet people in person like this guy who runs a grocery store. But I love businesses like that. People who I love the dry cleaners been there for 40 years. I love the local grocery store. I just love business. Those to me are so much more interesting than the billion dollar whatever. I just don't

フリード#51

質量が大きいほど向きを変えるエネルギーが要る。基本の物理だ。厚いビジネスは重い。顧客とプロダクトとの距離が遠い。大事なものの周りに分厚い層がある。大事なものは大きく、残りはできるだけ薄くしたい。37signalsは、厚くて良いプロダクトと、それを束ねる薄いビジネスを目指してきた。

EN

That's a great question. Um I feel like I feel like they're more real. I like real things. Um, for whatever that means, I you define it however you'd like, but a billion dollar business or a10 billion dollar business just it doesn't feel like a real thing to me. It feels like a a concept. Um, meanwhile, the dry cleaner down the street, I can drop off my shirt, I get it cleaned, I bring it up, I pick it up from the person who owns the place. This is her living. This is what they do. There's something for me that I connect with something that's real uh that I feel like I can hold in my head and I can I can understand. I keep coming back to this well not keep but I have already in this interview once this idea of the surface area and like an a business as an object. I want to be able to see the whole thing and understand the whole thing. A massive entity with tens of thousands of people and billions of dollars and whatever. I just I don't understand it. And that's maybe my own shortcoming or whatever. I don't really care again. Like I don't need to understand that. It's not my thing. Um but I just prefer smaller businesses and that's mo our customers are small business owners and I just I don't care about enterprise customers. I don't want them. I like small medium-sized businesses. They're more like me. I understand who they are. I understand what they do. I like that kind of stuff. So a business that can't be beyond a single person's comprehension. Like you can understand dry cleaners very you you gave this great story. Um I don't remember if it was in one of your books or not. There was like this you have you have like a love of craftsmanship uh that I get from your writing and yeah there's like a pizza place where it's like he will only sell is it the fresh dough and he has no it's a sandwich place. Can you tell this

フリード#52

大きくて重く忙しい会社である必要はない。薄くてプロダクトに集中し、同じ好みの人を見つけ、「十分」で維持できる。別の比喩はホッケースティック成長チャートだ。魅力がない。むしろ軌道に乗るロケットだ。地上を離れ重力を振り切るが、ある地点で軌道に入り、維持する。少し上下しても快適な帯域で周回する。品質と楽しさを保つ。

EN

Sandwich place. Sub Italian joint you know whatever. go in and and the s they're open as long as they have bread

フリード#53

2年目から軌道に乗れ、とは言わない。上がっていく期間は要る。でもずっと成長・成長・最大まで、ではなく、落ち着ける軌道を見つける。なぜ2倍の巨大さが要る? なぜ? 成長のための成長でなければ答えがない人も多い。どこかへ行って、そこで保つ——それが好きだ。

EN

They're not making like they're not that compensation.

センラ#54

君の最大の格言のひとつは「So what?(だから何?)」だと思う。

EN

Yeah. They could I'm sure get more sacks of bread from that. It's actually comes like in a sack, you know, like the big baguettes or whatever and like they just run out. They're done. They maybe usually it's like 2:30 or something. There's no hours on the door. They close when they close when they're done for the day. I just there's something to me very poetic and beautiful about that. And like again enough. It's just it comes back to this idea of there's enough in that they're done for the day. It's enough. They sold enough. But he does that because

フリード#55

質問が要るね。だから何? なぜ成長する? 例えると、テーブルに金を残しているのは確かだ。価格は最適化していない。絶えずA/Bもしていない。もっと成長・売上につながる公式を追っていない。答えは「だから何?」だ。居心地がいい。高マージンで予測可能。新しいものを作り、楽しんでいる。それを壊したくない。

EN

they could sell more. But then where do you stop? But this is the thing.

フリード#56

ちょうどいいサイズに来たのに満足できず、押しすぎて良さを失う人が多い。テーブルの金は興味がない。だから「だから何?」だ。

EN

I mean you're right. It is the quality too. But they could get more quality bread also. But there's Okay. So where do you stop?

センラ#57

最適化への生来の嫌悪があるように見える。合ってる?

EN

Like where does this end? Well, we could stay open till 6:30. I mean 7 probably. We could do 7:30. Someone's still at the door. We could do eight. You could you could see how this doesn't end and how a a business like that could consume everything and then you begin to not like it because there's nothing else in your life but that then you're so attached to it like you can see how this could expand to that degree. I I just think this idea of like well you're done at 2:30 is healthy. I think the business lasts longer because of that. I think like if you think about like you don't probably get bored of a business like that. There's something about that versus this idea of a business that you have to maximize and fully fill all your time, all your energy, everything, all the I just I don't I I can understand the appeal there for a while, but I also think there's something very just simply beautiful about enough. Now, I don't own that business. They might wish they had a lot more revenue and sold a lot more sandwiches. So, I I also want to recognize the fact that I'm looking at this from the outside. I'm an objective observer. I don't know the realities of that business, but I'm just observing what I think is a beautiful thing. Uh, which is a business that's been around for a long time, familyowned, does enough business for them to support themselves and their employees, make great food for their customers. Like, isn't that what this is about?

フリード#58

数字まわりの最適化は嫌いだ。500万が取れる、XYZで510万——そのXYZに興味がない。でもプロダクトを良くする最適化は好きだ。自分が使い、顧客も使う。楽しい。500万からさらに10万絞るのは退屈。退屈を超えた退屈。プロダクトを良くすることにお金を使いたい。良くやっている地点では、もう関係ないはずだ。

EN

Are you proud of how long that you've been able to stay in business?

フリード#59

誰かが入って一晩で事業を倍にするかもしれない。認める。答えは「だから何?」。興味がない。

EN

Is the time important to you? Like if I could tell you, okay, you can make the same exact amount of money that you made in 27 years, but you made it in 15 and you're done.

センラ#60

自分をCEOだとも思っていない。また「だから何?」が出た。

EN

You take the 27?

フリード#61

CEOという語も好きではない。最高経営責任者——何の? プロダクトを作り、デイビッドと一緒に会社を回す。CEOは要らない。意思決定をし、プロダクトを作り、ドラマのない良い人を雇い、チームを組み、顧客を大切にし、好きな良いプロダクトを作る。完璧と呼ぶ余地は謙虚に残すが、CEOが何を意味するかはわからない。

EN

I would take the 27

フリード#62

昨日、顧客から200通くらいメールを返した。CEOの時間の使い方として無責任だと言う人もいる。僕は最良のことだと思う。自分をCEOだとは思っていない。

EN

all the money does like Patrick who who you interviewed, right?

センラ#63

時間の無駄と言う人は、Foundersを聴くべきだ。歴史上の最良の創業者はみんなそうだ。プロダクト以外どうでもいい。君は自分をデザイナーだと思っている?

EN

Yeah.

フリード#64

はい。それでいい。

EN

I I love what he said about work. It's like I think something like I work so I could work more or something like that, right?

センラ#65

人生のすべてをデザインしているように見える。思考をたくさん入れて、ビジネスも自分に合うようデザインしている。

EN

The reward for good work is more work is to keep going.

フリード#66

できるだけ。家族と子供もいて、思う通りにはならない。でも誇りと幸せの中で生きられるシステムを作る。

EN

Great way to phrase it. And so that's why 27 years is more interesting than 15. I like this stuff. Like

センラ#67

最良の創業者は、経営者と顧客のあいだの「封筒の厚さ」をほぼゼロにする。100年前の例——UPS創業者Jim Casey。幹部が耳障りの良いことだけ言うのに気づき、茶色いUPSトラックを見たら止めろと運転手に命じ、現場の人と直接話した。

EN

the beauty about this for me is that somehow we've managed to build this system, this thing, this company, these products that sustain over a long period of time that allow us to enjoy our craft and our work over a long period of time. And we are in control of that as much as we can be. The market can change. Anything can happen at any time. But I can control my cost. I can control my quality. I can control my messaging as best I can. And we can make the best thing we can over time and keep making that thing. Like that's like that's why I want to that's what I want to do. This is my whole point. I don't want to trade my position with anybody for anything. I can love what other people do too. I do like there's great products all over the place. I'm like, "Wow, that's an amazing thing that someone made." Like, for example, um, one of my favorite products is the Concept 2 rower. Are you familiar with this?

センラ#68

Jeff Bezos——君たちのパートナーでもある——も、幹部にカスタマーサポートをやらせた。

EN

I don't know anything about the company, but I can reverse engineer that. I bet it's a badass killer company, too. Because that's how I look at things, by the way. I look at the products, not the companies. Look at the products and go, "Oh, that's a great product. I bet that's a great company." Or, "This this product is is nah, I don't like this product. I bet the company's kind of I do this for people. If you can make a great product, you're probably interesting person to talk to.

フリード#69

同じことをしていた。しばらくやっていないが、またやるべきだ。Everyone on support——会社をローテーションで1日サポートに入れる。主に僕とデイビッドがやるためで、今は僕はどのみちやっている。大事だ。

EN

Yeah, I could see that reverse thing as well. I mean, again, look to the inside to figure out what what forms on the outside. So, Concept 2 is probably one of my favorite products of all time. The Concept 2 rower. Their bikes are good, too, and they they make a ski machine, too. But the rower is like my favorite machine, and I love it because it is so well built. First of all, it's under 1,000 bucks, and it's been under 1,000 bucks, I think, forever. And it's been around forever. There's been different variations of it, but they're always improving on a theme. It's roughly the same thing every iteration, but slightly better. It comes in a big box, very easy to assem. It's a big machine, but comes it's very easy to assemble. Um the the display is black and white LCD, not even LED, LCD with like five rubberized buttons and then I think there's two other ones. It runs on C or D batteries. No electricity, no plugging in, no recharge. Oh … like it's done. Uh, get some new batteries. Like, it just works. The buttons you press, there's no touch screens. The thing is reliable. It always works. It's incredibly durable. It does exactly what it's supposed to do with nothing else. And I look at that and I go, that is a perfect product. One of the few perfect products I've ever seen. Like a paperclip and a Concept 2 rower. Like, hard to improve on both of those things. Like, I have deep admiration for that kind of thing. I still wouldn't want to trade my company for theirs because I don't know anything about what they do. I know what I do, but um I can still like respect and admire all sorts of things and all sorts of companies, but I still wouldn't want to be them. I like what we do and I like that I can do it for a long period of time. And hopefully I'll do it for as long as I feel like I want to do it. And then at some point we'll decide that we're not going to do it anymore. And I don't know when that'll be. Um I'm always a year-to-year guy. I'm a day-to-day guy when it comes to planning. Like I talked about a little bit earlier, I don't I don't believe in long-term planning. I believe in being around for the long term, but I think the best way to do that is day by day, not like quarter by quarter or year by year. Just figure out today and figure out tomorrow and figure out tomorrow. I've always been like mystified by people who think they can figure out the next three years today, but they're afraid of figuring out tomorrow tomorrow. Like I I I need to plan the next three years. So I can do that. I can plan like what uh 900 or thousand days in advance but like tomorrow I can't figure things out if I don't have a plan. Like you can figure things out tomorrow if you can figure things out for the next thousand days.

フリード#70

シカゴに住んでいたころ、近くにOlivia'sという食料品店があった。店主が客を個人的に知っていて、入ると挨拶する。何百何千ものユーザーがいるうちの製品では、それができないのが悔しい。道で75人の顧客とすれ違ってもわからない。彼はわかる。

EN

There's no plan. I mean like we have a direction. So the way the way I think about this and this is like again another weird metaphor perhaps but I I think of our business and maybe me even like like like I'm a squirrel. Okay, [laughter] you probably weren't expecting this. So you watch a squirrel run across a field. What does it do? Like it knows where it wants to go roughly and it runs and it scurries and it stops and it looks around and then it scurryries some more and it stops and it looks around and it scurryies some more. It doesn't need to get exactly where it wants to go. It knows roughly where it wants to go and it clearly doesn't know how exactly it's going to get there, but it knows like where it's headed and then it course corrects. That's how I do it. So, at our company, we typically think about 6 weeks in advance. Um, and that's about it. There's some occasional projects, maybe a few over the 27 years that we've done that we needed to think further ahead. Um, like we just recently left the cloud, left AWS, and we're running our own stuff now in data centers. That was like a much bigger project. Okay. But most projects, 99% of them at our company take six weeks or less, and most of them take just much less than that. But 6 weeks is the most we're willing to think ahead. And then day-to-day like I the six weeks is like where the squirrel is headed. So it's not super clearly defined. It's generally defined. And then we figure it out as we go. We just figure it out as we go on a day-to-day basis. Like the teams figure it out as they go. Like there I kind of set or sound David or someone sets like the target generally. Not again not like financial targets but like generally we're headed in this direction with this idea. Figure out how to get there on your own. We'll check in when we need to. You ask if you want some help. Happy to come in. I'll review stuff as we go. But it's a bunch of course correction to get us there. And uh I find that that is the most honest real way to get somewhere good because in general you know more about things the closer they are to you. So I don't know what's going to happen five Mondays from now. But well today's not today's Thursday. So let's just take Friday. Five Fridays from now or tomorrow. I probably have a better idea of what might happen tomorrow than I do five tomorrows or five Fridays from now. So, I'll worry about those when I get there. Let me worry about tomorrow. Let me nail tomorrow. Let me get tomorrow right. Let's do the right stuff tomorrow. Let's make the right decisions tomorrow and then we'll make some more on Monday and make some more on Tuesday and make some more on Wednesday. Like, just make small decisions all the time and don't put yourself in a place where you're making huge ones you're afraid of and you can sort of get wherever you want to go for 27 plus years. There's a question that I keep getting asked by different people, so it must be a popular question. And I'm always perplexed by it. They're like, "What is you seem to have something good going right now? What does success look like five years from now?"

フリード#71

だからできるだけ近づく。Basecampに登録すると最初に、僕からの手紙とメールアドレスと署名が出る。メールしてほしい。AIもアシスタントも層もない。ただ書いて。本にもメールアドレスを載せている。使う人とできるだけ近くにいたい。彼らを幸せにするためだけでなく、自分も幸せにするため。僕たちは最初の顧客だ。彼らがどう使い、どんな言葉で語るか、誰なのかを知りたい。それが染み込み、彼らのレバーの使い心地がわかる。食料品店の店主のように対面では会えないから、メールアドレスを共有するしかない。

EN

I don't know. That's the answer. I don't care. [laughter]

フリード#72

40年のクリーニング店、地元の食料品店が好きだ。10億ドル企業よりずっと面白い。

EN

What is five I don't even know. Five years from now. Like what what what's the difference? It's like it's it's an interesting question because it's a directional question, but I don't care. I don't have an answer.

センラ#73

なぜ?

EN

My answer is boring. Just more of this.

フリード#74

より現実的に感じる。10億・100億ドル企業は概念に感じることがある。クリーニング店はシャツを預け、洗い、店主から受け取る。それが生活だ。頭の中で抱えられ、全体が見える。万単位の人と億単位の金の巨大な存在は理解できない。自分の限界でも構わない。小さなビジネスが好きで、顧客も中小企業主だ。エンタープライズは要らない。自分に似た人を理解したい。

EN

Yeah, sure.

センラ#75

一個人の理解を超えない事業。君は職人技への愛もある。シカゴのサンドイッチ店——パンがなくなったら閉店、という話を。

EN

I mean, that's essentially what it is until

フリード#76

Vinny'sだったと思う。Chicago Avenue。パンがあるあいだだけ開いて、売り切れたら終わり。袋に入ったバゲットが尽きたら閉店。だいたい午後2時半。ドアに営業時間はない。詩的で美しい。十分だ。その日はもう十分売った。

EN

So, here's the thing about those questions. People answer those questions today for who they think they're going to be then.

フリード#77

もっとパンを仕入れられる。でもどこで止める? 6時半、7時、7時半——ドアにまだ誰かがいる。終わりがない。事業がすべてを食い、他の人生がなくなる。2時半で終わりは健康だ。長続きし、飽きにくい。最大化で時間とエネルギーを全部埋めるのとは違う。十分であることの単純な美しさだ。外側からの観察で、彼らがもっと売上を望んでいる可能性もある。でも長く続く家族経営で、自分と従業員を支え、良い食べ物を出す——それがビジネスではないか。

EN

this is the answer basically.

センラ#78

長く続けられたことを誇りに思う?

EN

I've read all your books. I've listened to almost all your episodes. We've shared a bunch of meals together. Um and I never even knew that you just did the day thing too because that's what I was like I just feel I was like I try to make a good 24 hours and then I was like, "Oh, I like this day. So like I'll do it again tomorrow." And I had this line that I said uh by accident. I was like, "Well, all a great life is is just a string of great days." So like all I focus on is just let me make a great day. And I told you last night where it's like the way I think about very similar to what you're doing or what I'm doing is like I'm just laying bricks and like today I'm making a podcast and tomorrow I'll make another one and a few days later I'll make another one and then I'll let the score take care of itself because I just like doing this and I do it the way I want to do it and I want to make a great product. And so my answer to that question is just like this like I just want to be making more podcasts. I know I'm going to be reading books forever. that that's the only unbroken habit I've ever had in my entire life over 30 something years. I can't stop reading. So, I'm going to be reading books. So, that's my what my other podcast is about. And I like talking to smart, interesting people that do great …

フリード#79

誇り、というより幸運だと思う。プライドはちょっと違う。

EN

And I don't think I'm ever going to stop doing that. So, that's what this is.

センラ#80

時間は大事? 27年分の金を15年で稼いで終わり、と言われたら?

EN

Yeah. Great answer. And if one day you decide you don't want to do this anymore,

フリード#81

27年を取る。金は副作用だ。Patrick(O'Shaughnessy)が言っていた——良い仕事の報酬は、もっと仕事をすること。だから27年の方が面白い。

EN

then you just change.

フリード#82

長い時間続けられるシステムとプロダクトを、コントロールできる範囲で建てられたことが美しい。市場は変わる。でもコスト、品質、メッセージはコントロールできる。最善のものを作り続けたい。誰とも立場を交換したくない。他の人の素晴らしいプロダクトは好きだ。でも交換はしない。

EN

I don't know. I said if [laughter]

フリード#83

例えばConcept 2のローイングマシンが大好きだ。会社のことは知らないが、逆算するとすごい会社だろうと思う。プロダクトを見て会社を推測する。良いプロダクトなら、作った人も面白い。

EN

uh, very I'd be very disappointed in myself.

フリード#84

Concept 2のローワーは史上好きなプロダクトのひとつ。1000ドル未満でずっとそのくらい。テーマを少しずつ改良。大きな箱で組み立てやすい。白黒LCD、ゴムっぽいボタン数個、CかD電池。電源不要、充電不要。タッチ画面なし。耐久性抜群。やるべきことだけ。完璧なプロダクト。クリップとConcept 2。どちらも改良しにくい。深い敬意がある。それでも自分の会社とは交換しない。長く続けられるのが好きだ。

EN

Maybe we do this till 80, right? Hopefully.

フリード#85

計画は年単位でもなく、日単位だ。長期でいることは信じるが、その最良の方法は日々だ。3年後を今日決められるのに、明日を明日決めるのが怖い、という人が謎だ。900日先は計画できるのに、明日は計画がないと動けない、という。

EN

Do you feel you have like a narrow aperture with the world? I feel like you're you're like

センラ#86

日々どう計画する?

EN

I don't.

フリード#87

計画はない。方向はある。自分と会社をリスだと思う。野原を走るリスは、だいたいの行き先を知って走り、止まり、周りを見て、また走る。正確な経路は知らないが、向かう先は知っている。コース修正する。

EN

Okay.

フリード#88

会社ではだいたい6週間先まで考える。それだけ。27年で数件、もっと先を見る必要があった——最近AWSを離れ自前データセンターに移したような大プロジェクト。でも99%は6週間以下。6週間がリスの向かう先のざっくりした定義で、日々はチームが自分で詰める。金融目標ではなく、このアイデアでこの方向、と示す。行き方は自分で。必要ならチェックイン。助けが要れば入る。レビューする。コース修正の連続だ。

EN

what you just said like why are you worried about all these other opportunities out there in the world? like you just seem to be focused on like I'm building the business the way I want. It's a perfect business for myself. You're kind of uh not oblivious. I don't mean this obviously in a destructive way by any means. Like yeah, you just you don't really care what other people in the your industry are doing. You you have a like a narrow focus on Yeah. I don't know if it's narrow or wide. It just is like I'm doing what I'm doing and it doesn't matter what they're doing.

フリード#89

近いことほどよくわかる。5週間後の金曜より、明日の方がわかる。明日を正しくする。月曜、火曜、水曜と小さな決断を積み重ねる。恐れる巨大な決断を避ける。27年以上そうしてきた。

EN

Why?

センラ#90

よく聞かれる質問がある。「5年後の成功はどんな姿?」

EN

I think what ends up happening is, and you see this in in my world, you see it everywhere. Everyone follows everybody else because when you're paying so much attention to what everyone else is doing, you tend to just that's the way you think it has to be done or can be done. You're not open to like alternatives because you don't see them anywhere. And then you get a people people then build out of fear like gosh, they're doing this, they're launching this, I have to meet them. There has to be parody between my product and theirs. Then you end up following everybody. I don't like that. I like to take inspiration. If I'm going to take inspiration from anything uh productwise, it's going to be outside my it's it's the Concept 2 rower. It's not another piece of software. I'm not inspired by their software. I like buildings. I like furniture. I like uh concept 2. I like watches. I like other things outside of my world that I can sort of admire and and understand and sort of get fired up about. And I don't know if those things come back. I don't think they need to come back. Like, everyone's always like, "How does that come back and help you build your business?" Like, I don't know. I don't care. Why? Why does it have to? Why does everything have to come back to business? Like, why does everything have to influence your decisions? Like, these are all things that just happen. They exist in your world. They they happen to you and they and they form you and you're not even aware of most of it. and and you just become like I think if you admire a variety of different things and pay attention to different things and enjoy a walk in the woods like a few days ago I was just it's like 4:45 you know California here the light is just beautiful at the end of the day I'm just sitting outside looking at the way the sun is raking over the hills like I'd rather look at that than it's piece of software I'm learning more from that I'm getting more from that than I am a competitor's product I don't want to look at that I want to look at the sun I want to look at the ocean I want look go for a walk. I want to look at nature. I want to look at great furniture. I want to be in great architecture. Like that fills me up in a way. I'm getting enough of the software world by being in it. I don't want to soak in it. I want to soak outside of it. And then my only soaking in the software world is my own stuff. That's enough. It's enough for me to focus on.

フリード#91

知らない。興味もない。だから何? 5年後に何の違いがある? 方向の質問としては面白いが、答えはない。

EN

Tell me about your idea of Galapicos Island product design. [laughter]

センラ#92

僕の答えは退屈だ。ただこれをもっと。

EN

I just like there's something really cool about islands that like have evolved on their own. I just like I don't know. I've never been to the Golopagus. My wife's been. She asked me if I wanted to go. I didn't want to go because I I it's too far, but I should have gone probably. But um actually, I didn't want to go, frankly, be there. Part of that was it was too far. I also felt like like let it Can we let it be? [laughter] Although I it's got to be I mean, she loved it and I'm so glad she went and the pictures are incredible and it seems like an amazing experience. But there's something very cool about um things that have just evolved on their own that are not influenced by other things. And I try to think of us as the Galopagus. I don't think of us this way really, but like conceptually there's I don't like use the word the Galopagus island of the software and I don't use that, but I do think of us as um actually an insular group focused on solving a problem our own way without paying too much attention to what everyone else is doing. I'm like aware of it because I live in it, but I I'm not seeking out ideas from other companies in our field. I I think that that's actually a slippery slope. It is because we see so much copying in our industry. Like someone has a successful product and then all future products for the next three years look just like theirs. That says to me that there's a there's danger here. Don't fall into that trap. Our stuff looks different than everybody else's stuff. Our stuff works differently than everybody else's stuff. Nothing works like base camp fizzy. It's all different. And some people hate the way our stuff looks and works. Fine. Don't care. We have enough people who love what we do. Um, and it's an expanding pie of people who are into what we do and we love what we do. And again, that's like enough for us. Even your landing pages look different. They're essentially a letter from you describing Yeah.

フリード#93

そういうことだ。人は「そのときの自分だと思う誰か」に答える。そのときの自分はわからない。愚かな問いでもある。

EN

what the product is and why it exists.

センラ#94

君の本もほぼ全部のエピソードも読み、食事も何度もしたのに、君も日々だと知らなかった。良い24時間を作り、気に入ったらまた明日やる。たまたま言った——素晴らしい人生は、素晴らしい日の連なり。今日はポッドを作り、明日も、また数日後も。スコアは後でついてくる。好きなことを、好きなやり方で、良いプロダクトとして。5年後は「もっとポッドを作っている」。30年以上途切れない読書習慣。Foundersもそれだ。賢い面白い人と話すのもやめない。

EN

Yeah. I wouldn't like I I always try to build things that I would want to see. Like I build the company I want to work at. Um I hire the people I want to work with. I try to write I do all of our writing. So all of our I don't do the design on the I work with our designer to do a lot of that. But um he's sort of the visual uh person there. Um but I do all the writing and I I want every word to land with meaning. This is again like thin thick. I don't like thick stuff, thin. Like, how can I just get to the right point, but not be sterile? It's a problem sometimes when getting to the point you need to be sterile. So, like there should be a little bit of bounce, a little bit of rhythm in the writing. It should feel nice. Um, you should be carried through it. It there should be some momentum in there. And I just love doing it. That's my favorite thing to do. Actually, the company's right. We just do stuff that we like. I like that style. If you look at my product demos, I always do the demo for the product, like the launch. They're long and they're unedited and I screw up a bunch and I don't care. Like this is if I was sitting with you, what I want to try to get to with this kind of stuff is if I'm showing you something my our product literally you're like behind me or sitting next to me and we're looking at this thing together. If I screw up two minutes in, I'm not going to go let's start over. I'm just going to keep going. And so that's how I want these to feel. I want to like connect with people in a real way. This is like a real person showing off a real product. This is a real person writing a real thing. My name's on it, my signatures on it, my email's on it. Like, we are who we are. We are, we represent ourselves as we are. We are not a corporate entity hiding behind a structure. We're not a CEO or we're a CTO hiding from our customers. We don't have a board. We're not like, we don't have any of these things. It's just us running the show. And the show is open for anyone to see. And, you know, we open source most of our of our work. We're very open about sharing everything we know as best we possibly can. I just feel like there's no reason not to. Um I I just I just want to be direct and clear with people and like hopefully they like that and some people don't. Some people like, "Oh, you guys are too small. I can't trust you." Like I'm not out to convince anybody of anything. Like that's the other thing. Like I I don't want to convince anyone. I don't like marketing language. I don't like tricks. Here we are. Here's what we do. Here's what our product does. Like that's the best we can do and that's the best I want to do. And I think it's the honest way to be and and take it or leave it. Like some people don't like it. That's totally fine. I get it.

フリード#95

いい答えだ。いつかこれをやめたくなったら、変えればいい。

EN

I love the idea of doubling down on authenticity and leaving the mistakes in. I remember reading one of your essays a long time ago. It was I can't remember the culture, but they would do

センラ#96

そこで少し分かれる。僕が崖から飛び降りたら失望するだろう、という話。

EN

rugs. Okay, I'll tell you the story. I was in Wisconsin um in this little town called Mineral Point, Wisconsin. Small little town about 50 mi west of Madison. And I was wandering through this gallery. Strange like it it was this weird building. It looked like a like a junkyard inside. Like you peered in, it's like what is going on in here? something in and I saw some like old man on the back. Like there's going to be something cool here. So I knock on his door. I walk in. There's some rugs hanging, but there's also like junk everywhere. Anyway, he comes out and you're like, "Okay, this guy's a character. I love characters. I love old people. There's something going on there, right?" I'm like, "Who is this guy?" So he's he's a Nav He collects Nav he's dead now, but he collects Navajo rugs. Um so anyone can't go there today is what I'm saying. But he collects Navajo rugs. And I was looking and I I find them very beautiful. They're very simply patterned and the colors are very vibrant and they're very interesting and there's just I don't know what it was that they spoke to me, right? Um, and I don't want to analyze why either because I I I find that that's a great way to ruin any experience is to try to figure out why. Just does it or does it not? It does. I love these things for whatever reason. So, I go in talking to the guy and I noticed that they have a lot of errors on them. Like there's what I thought was an error. Like there's geometric shapes. So, their their rugs are very geometric. they're they're stripes, they're squares, they're triangles, they're all sorts of different shapes. Um, and a lot of them like weren't quite right. You know, you can like look at a shape and go, it's not they're trying to make a perfect triangle, but it's like not quite right. And I and I asked him about that or there's a stitch that's off, very clearly off. I'm like, they could have just taken that out and redone it. And he said to me, he said, you know, and again, I don't know if this is true, but this is what he told me. Um, which is the Navajo, like they don't see those as mistakes. They're just like a moment in time. And he he related it this way. He's like, if you're walking on a path, if you're climbing a mountain or something and you're going on a path and you trip or you stumble or whatever, like you don't start back. You can't take that stumble back. It just happened. The Navajo leave these in their rugs because they just happened. And this is a record of what happened. I love that. I just thought it was like so lovely and I've tried to do that with the things that I do. I mean I I don't like want to leave typos and stuff like that's not quite the same thing but like if I make a mistake on a video or something or whatever like I whatever that's what you would do in the real world. So I'm comfortable with that. I've always found that to be very um just again a very beautiful thing that that like these are not mistakes. Mistakes are a concept we put on ourselves when we do something that wasn't what we intended. Why does that have so much weight? Maybe what we intended was wrong, too. I don't know. Does are these rugs worse because there's a stitch off? No, they're not worse. They're better. And that's kind of what I'm striving for with this stuff is not to take things so damn seriously and build a company that's afraid of itself and afraid to do anything wrong and afraid to have an opinion. You know, all these companies, not that's a very broad statement. And all these companies, you know, like everyone's afraid. Companies are afraid like they have PR people and they got to talk to lawyers before they publish anything. Everyone's afraid of everything of of of of saying something wrong, doing something wrong, being wrong in some way that is not endearing. I think people want to do business with people and they have to do business with companies because companies provide a lot of product. But I think they really want to do business with people. And maybe this is why I like the the dry cleaner. Maybe this is why I like the grocery store. Maybe this is why I like running my business my way. I feel like people are dealing with people. We don't have a big corporate structure. We're just 62 people currently doing the things that we're doing. We're all accessible, all reachable. No one's hiding from anybody. This is what we do. And I just find that to be there's there's a again a thinness, a directness to that which just has an aesthetic value to me that I can't quite explain. Um it's like the quality that cannot be explained. I think it might have been Christopher Alexander or something who was an architect uh who who talked about this. I might be totally off on this, but I think conceptually the idea was you can go see buildings in in like in in native villages and there's no architect that made any of this stuff. They didn't have any architects. They had people making places for them to live and work and worship. And there's a certain quality to that which is not um textbook highquality but is beyond high quality because it's a perfect fit for what they wanted for themselves. That's the kind of stuff I like to build.

フリード#97

他の興味が見つかるかもしれない。Bezosが言った——情熱は探すものではなく、向こうから来る。10年前知らなかったことに今はまっている。空いて開いているのも美しい。これを好きで、別のことも好きになる。好きでなくなる時が来てもいい。信じないのはわかる。でも80までこれでもいいし、誰にもわからない。5年計画が滑稽なのもそのためだ。明日を正しくすればいい。

EN

It's kind of how you're designing your company.

フリード#98

薄いこと、小さな単位に戻る。日は良い小さな単位。単純な決断も。間違えても24時間で終わる。8ヶ月かけて大勢を巻き込み巨大な決断をして失敗すると、後始末が重い。小さくして、捨てられる単位にする。一年で十分な良い単位があればいい。完璧な一年計画ではない。アンチフラジャイルになる。大きな機会を逃すかも——だから何? やりたい事業を続けられるなら、他の機会を心配しなくていい。やっていることに集中し、望む限り何度でもうまくやればいい。

---

EN

This exactly how I started um doing the podcast. I think I'm drawn to that too. Like the the I think in people, not companies, right? And this is why I was drawn to podcasts to begin with because you it's impossible. Some of these p these podcasters that I was fans of before I had a podcast. I've heard them speak for hundreds of hours. Like you can't hide who you are at that point. You're going to like the good. You're going to hear the mistakes. And I use the word endearing. And that's exactly how I feel for like some of the people that I admire. There like something about them that is endearing. In fact, a friend of mine just text me this morning. Uh my friend Lulu, she was listening to one of my old podcasts on like Napoleon's maxims on Founders like episode 337 if I remember correctly.

センラ#99

世界への開口部が狭い感じがする。業界の他の人が何をしているかをあまり気にしない。

EN

And she was like thought it was hilarious that I didn't edit out the fact that I was mispronouncing all these French names. And I'm just like I don't know. I'm like reading from the book. I'm like I don't know what this is. I don't speak French. Like so I'm just going to I'm going to do this phonetically. But it was endearing to her that I didn't like, you know, look up how like act like I speak French or anything else. Like this is I read books and I'm just guessing at how this is pronounced.

フリード#100

狭いのか広いのかわからない。やっていることをやっていて、彼らが何をやっているかは関係ない。

EN

You're not putting on errors. Like the like I guess like I admire anyone who is truly themselves and that's what that was for you. You're like I could have probably faked the accent, you know, like you watch TV news and it's like the guy like uses the Hispanic accent for like some, you know, Spanish word and you're like that's weird. like you're trying too hard. Like just like you don't need to like if you don't speak Spanish, you don't need to fake the accent to try to speak Spanish is what I was trying to get at.

センラ#101

他の人のプロダクト作りをどれくらい見る?

EN

Um and and it's like but you see it all the time. It's like just I don't know what I don't know how to pronounce French words either. Like I'm not even going to try. I'll just say what I say and read it phonetically and like you could even say like I would even go like I don't know I don't know how to say this.

フリード#102

ほとんど見ない。見たくない。見すぎると、みんながみんなを追う。それがやり方だと信じ、代替が見えなくなる。恐怖から「彼らがローンチした、パリティが要る」と追い、全員が後追いになる。嫌だ。

EN

I do say like I don't know what this is. You're you're going to laugh at me but this is what I what and then you move on and no one gives a damn because you're you and that's not the point of the story. The point of the story is not perfect French pronunciation like with seven words out of 5,000. It's like what is the story and who's telling it and why are you telling it? That's what matters. Figuring out the stuff that actually matters is what's important about that process. And I think again running a business and making decisions about product, it's like what matters, what doesn't matter. That's fun. Going back to you writing these letters for the landing page.

フリード#103

インスピレーションを取るなら分野外だ。Concept 2。別のソフトではない。建物、家具、時計。それらがビジネスにどう返るか? 知らないし、興味もない。すべてがビジネスに返る必要はない。森の散歩、カリフォルニアの午後4時45分の光が丘に斜めに落ちる——競合のソフトよりそこから学ぶ。ソフトの世界には、自分のものをやるだけで十分浸かっている。外に浸かりたい。

EN

I need to interrupt you. I was a fan of your writing. The first time we met, I showed you the Amazon. I was like, listen, I have receipts here. I've been reading your stuff for 13, 15 years. I bought hay just because I wanted to give you money because I would I'd buy your books, but I I didn't have a team and base camp's project management and like I'm working by myself. [laughter]

センラ#104

ガラパゴス諸島的なプロダクトデザイン、という話を。

EN

Yeah.

フリード#105

島が独自に進化する感じが好きだ。ガラパゴスには行ったことがない。妻は行った。遠すぎて行かなかったが、行けばよかったかも。放っておいてほしい、という気持ちもあった。独自に進化し、他に影響されないもの。概念的に僕たちをそう思いたい。分野の他社からアイデアを積極的に取らない。知っているが、探しにいかない。滑りやすい坂だ。

EN

And so I couldn't ever give you money. And then you built up so much goodwill by teaching me so much through your writing that I was like, "Oh, I use email. I'm going to buy that product." So I'm a proud subscriber of Hey, just because I was like, I got to give this I got to pay you back somehow.

フリード#106

成功したプロダクトのコピーが3年続くのを見る。危険だ。うちのものは見た目も動きも違う。BasecampもFizzyも違う。嫌いな人もいる。構わない。好きな人が十分いる。パイは広がっている。ランディングページも違う。本質的に僕からの手紙で、何でなぜ存在するかを書く。

EN

It happens so much

フリード#107

働きたい会社を建て、働きたい人を雇い、文章は全部自分が書く。デザインはデザイナーと。すべての言葉が意味を持って着地してほしい。薄い・厚い。要点に行くが、無菌にはしたくない。少しの弾み、リズム、運ばれる感覚。好きだ。

EN

This goes back to we we identify with people not companies.

フリード#108

プロダクトデモも自分でやる。長く、未編集、途中で失敗する。隣に座って見せているなら、2分で失敗しても最初からはやり直さない。そのまま続ける。本物の人が本物のプロダクトを見せる。名前、署名、メールがある。企業構造の陰に隠れない。ボードもない。見せるショーを自分たちで回している。仕事の多くはオープンソース。知っていることはできるだけ共有する。直接で明確に。マーケの言葉やトリックは嫌い。これが僕たち、これがやる、これがプロダクト。取れなければいい。

EN

behind the product. How would you describe

センラ#109

真正性に賭けて失敗を残すのが好きだ。昔のエッセイ——ラグの話。

EN

it was the love behind the product.

フリード#110

ウィスコンシン州Mineral Point。マディソンの西約50マイル。ガラクタ屋みたいなギャラリーに入った。老人がナビホのラグを集めていた(今は故人)。幾何学的で色が鮮やかで、なぜかは分析したくない——好きなら好きだ。

EN

Love.

フリード#111

多くのラグに「エラー」があった。完璧な三角形を狙っているのに少しずれている、明らかにずれた縫い目。やり直せたはずだと聞いた。彼は——真実かはわからないが——ナビホはそれをミスと見ない、その瞬間だ、と言った。山道でつまずいても最初には戻らない。つまずきは起きた。ラグに残すのは起きたことの記録だ。美しい。タイポを残したいわけではないが、動画で失敗しても現実世界と同じだ。意図しなかったことに過剰な重みを置く必要はない。意図自体が間違っているかもしれない。縫い目がずれてラグが悪くなるわけではない。むしろ良くなる。

EN

Well, I I don't want to get like silly about it because it's not You don't really You can't really love I know, but like it's a different version of love.

フリード#112

自分を恐れ、意見を恐れ、PRと弁護士の会社は嫌だ。人は人とビジネスしたい。会社とせざるを得ないことが多いが、クリーニング店や食料品店が好きなのも、人と人だからだ。62人でやっている。誰も隠れない。薄さと直接性に、説明しにくい美的価値がある。

EN

Yes. That

フリード#113

Christopher Alexanderだったかもしれない——建築家がいない村の建物に、教科書的でない、自分たちに完璧に合う品質がある、という話。僕たちが建てたいのもそれだ。自分たちに完璧なフィット。最初に戻る——同じ人がどれだけいるか? 十分いる。それがビジネスモデルだ。

EN

No, I don't mean Yeah, I know. I know. But like Okay. So, there's a certain warmth and tone that comes through when you make something you're really proud of. In that way, we got to proud about running the business for 27 years. I'm really proud of the products we make. The business again is like the envelope. I'm not proud of the envelope. part of the things that sustain the business, which are the products. And and and I just I love getting them as right as I possibly can. And there is a warmth that comes to you when you're really proud to share something that you're done with that you finished that you want to put out there in the world. And it could be a letter, it could be a line, it could be the right word in the right place, it could be an entire product. And it can also be a company in a sense. Um but there is there is love reserved for that for sure. So, this is a love for the decentraliz I I think I read I remember reading this. You were talking about like if the the actual creation of email is actually a miracle. We've just kind of … that up.

センラ#114

ポッドもそう始めた。人に引かれて、会社ではない。何百時間も聞いたホストは隠せない。失敗も含めて愛おしい。友人のLuluが、Foundersのナポレオン回でフランス語の名前を全部間違えたのを編集していないのが面白い、と。発音は知らない。本を読んで音で言っている。

EN

Yeah.

フリード#115

エラーを盛っていない。本当の自分でいる人を尊敬する。ニュースでスペイン語だけアクセントを真似る——やりすぎ。知らなければ知らなくていい。「これは発音わからない」と言って進めばいい。5千語のうち7語の完璧なフランス語が話の本質ではない。何の話を誰がなぜするかだ。大事なことを見極めるのがプロダクトの決断でも楽しい。

EN

It's amazing that anybody in the world had can can get in touch with anybody else. There's no like platforms like everything else is a platform. You want to write someone on WhatsApp? Well, they have to have WhatsApp signal. They have to have signal whatever, right? Email, beautiful thing. Incred. It's like as beautiful as the web. The web is beautiful because anyone in the world with a web browser made by any company can use HTTP and like connect to some other some other website. Same thing is true with with basic email. These are wonders of the world. And how did they become so despised? I I blame Apple. I blame Google. I blame Yahoo. I blame Microsoft for making … email products that they just don't care about. Now they've started to care more about them, but they didn't care about them for a long time. And everybody knows that nobody cared. And so we we care. I I live in email sometimes. I don't we don't use email inside our company. We use base camp. But for the outside world, we use email. And I want to use tools I love. Like I want to use tools that matter to me. And if I'm going to spend most of my day in base camp, I want to make Base Camp. if I can spend the other part of my day in hey an email I want to make an email tool that I'm proud of that I want to use that I have a certain love for and that's what that is and that letter it was a love letter in fact it ended if I remember correctly like this is a love letter hey is our love letter to email and I I meant it

センラ#116

ランディングページの手紙は、Bezos式にプロダクト前に書く? 後? 途中?

EN

yeah it's a great thing it's amazing thing you just used the word tool a few times do you um identify with Toby Luke just like I'm just a tomaker I'm just a yeah I'm a tool maker

フリード#117

だいたい途中。HEYはローンチ前、プロダクトがまだ遠いときに手紙を書いた。

EN

I make too make tools

センラ#118

君の文章のファンだった。初めて会ったときAmazonの領収書みたいに、13・15年分読んできた証拠を見せた。本は買ったがチームがなくBasecampは使えなかった。だからHEYが出たとき、教えに恩返ししたくて買った。誇り高い購読者だ。

EN

that's how you think about Yeah, I don't I I'm in the So people like what do you do? I'm like I I go I'm in the software business so they understand what I do, but I don't like that term. I also don't like I'm in the tech industry. I'm not I'm not tech I'm not a tech person. Like I don't like that. I make tools. They just happen to be made of software. That's all I know how to do. I don't know how to make things out of wood, but I know how to make things out of software and code and design and conceptual ideas. And so yeah, I make tools. We make tools. We make levers. It's just a lever. It's a lever that lets you do more with it than you could without it. That's all it is. You can move more things. You can organize more people. You can come up with better ideas. You can see those ideas through. You can make progress with the products that we make. That's what a tool is for, to make progress.

フリード#119

ありがとう。使わないのに人を応援したくて買うこともある。人と同一化する。

EN

I'm fascinated by a lot of your time spent out of the business and a lot of the inspiration that you derive in life seem to be from physical things. You just named a bunch. of watches, cars, the concept, you know, maybe you're not podcasting in the future. What I know for sure is if I ever do anything else, it's going to be physical because the same phenomenon where like

センラ#120

使うことが応援で、必ずしも用途ではない、という買い方もある。

EN

I barely look at numbers. I know you barely look numbers, but it's just numbers on a screen and those numbers are happen to be big, but like you can't you don't understand that. He doesn't feel it. I remember there was a um Mark Leonard of Constellation Software did this podcast. He talked about one of his most fulfilling jobs he ever had was not you know starting and compounding you know whatever it was 50 million to 80 billion or whatever he's done with pure software

フリード#121

HEYの開発中、完成の何ヶ月も前にプリローンチページを出し、手紙を書いた。メールは美しい。長いあいだ人はメールを嫌ってきた——レールを外れたから。戻せる、と。愛する人からのメールは素晴らしい。今の大半はスパムとセールスと会議のゴミだ。プロダクトが何になるかは日々決めていた。知らないまま書いた。

EN

it was he was building stone walls

センラ#122

プロダクトの背後にあったのは?

EN

and even to this day he said he could go I think it was like a kid or a young man maybe was in his 20s 30s back then but you can go to where the stone wall that he worked on 30 years ago and he's like point at he's like I did that I made that

フリード#123

愛だ。

EN

why do you draw so much inspiration from physical Thanks. I'll take some guesses cuz I don't know. Just like I don't know why I like certain flavors. I just do, right? You can't really explain these things. But if I had to guess, again, it comes back to there's something real about them. Um, I like being able to hold things, touch things. I like texture. Something you'll see in a lot of our software products is actually texture, which is it's not real, it's simulated, but a lot of software these days is very flat. I I like gradients and colors and lines and some texture. I just find it to be very fulfilling and real to like rub your finger over something and feel it. I like patina. I like age on things. Software doesn't age. I mean, it does age. It can look old or whatever, but like the software looks the same over time. A great building, a great a great brick, to get back to bricks. Bricks are beautiful because they look even better as they get older. um they collect age on them, they get stronger, they're just they build into other things. I just there's something about the physical world to me that is just um we're from it, okay? Like we are it. We are part of it. Like there's something so fundamental about it that I try never to get too far away from it. Um I would much rather lay on the ground than like fly in the air, you know? I just want to be closer to things that are real. Um, now flying in the air is real, too, of course, but you know what I'm saying. Like, I'd rather walk somewhere. I'd rather drive. I' I'd like to be closer to the ground. I've begun to collect like rocks that I think are cool looking.

センラ#124

もう少し。

EN

Oh, now you move to Malibu.

フリード#125

バカバカしくしたくないが、別種の愛だ。

EN

Are these Are these rocks crystals?

センラ#126

ポッドを愛しているからわかる。自分で聴いて「これでいい」と思うのは愛だ。

EN

They're not crystals. I was going to save that in case you ask me. They're not crystals. I'll just find something at the beach or I'll find something interesting with a cool pattern in it and I just like I just like it. I don't know. I love nature. I love all the textures and patterns and colors. Like for example, you know, when you're coming up as a designer in the early days when I was designing like identities like logos and stuff, you kind of would go you'd go through these like logo books or like corporate identity books. Um I think there was an organization called um I want to call it brand but maybe I'm wrong. print actually was this magazine that had all these pictures of business cards and stuff and every designer I know would look through other business cards for inspiration for like color patterns and pallets and layouts and like I I'm like go outside like the best designs ever are right there. That leaf is the best it's ever been. Obviously, it's like survived and evolved. This is a great thing. And so I like if you want to find great colors, look at a bird. Don't look at a book. Like, look look look look at a leaf, right? Look at the ocean. Look look look look look go to a tide pool and just look at the colors in that tide pool. Look at the way the light reflects. Like that's the real stuff. And what for I have goosebumps like for me whatever it is whenever I talk about this like it's just fundamentally real to me and I just love it. And like I love the screen too. I love making software too, but probably because I'm in that a lot. I really like not being in that too.

フリード#127

誇らしいものを共有するときの温かさがある。27年続けたことより、作るプロダクトに誇りがある。ビジネスは封筒。支えるプロダクトに誇りがある。手紙でも一行でも単語でもプロダクト全体でも、出し終えたものへの愛はある。

EN

I don't think you love the screen. You said if you sell your business

センラ#128

メールの発明は奇跡なのに、僕たちが台無しにした、という話も。

EN

right now, I do. [laughter]

フリード#129

世界の誰とでも連絡できる。WhatsAppもSignalも相手が同じアプリを持たないといけない。メールは違う。ウェブと同じく美しい。HTTPでどのブラウザからでもつながる。それがなぜ忌み嫌われたか。Apple、Google、Yahoo、Microsoftのクソなメール製品のせいだ。長く気にしなかった。僕たちは気にする。社内はBasecampだが、外はメール。好きなツールで一日を過ごしたい。だからBasecampを作り、HEYを作る。手紙はメールへのラブレターで終わっていたはずだ。本気だった。

EN

If I All right, we never get that. Let's get this.

センラ#130

「ツール」と言った。Tobiみたいに道具職人?

EN

Yes. You said if you sold your business, you're never going to use a computer again.

フリード#131

ツールを作る。ソフト業界、とは言うが好きではない。テック業界の人でもない。ソフトウェアという素材でツールを作るだけ。木はできないが、コードとデザインと概念はできる。レバーだ。なければ動けないものを動かす。人を組織し、アイデアを通し、進捗を作る。ツールの用途は進捗だ。

EN

Well, I said I would never start another business again. What I would like to do is I'd like to shut my laptop. I'd like to turn off I I Yeah. Okay. I don't need a screen to survive my days. I'd like to close my laptop for a year and just not use I'll use my phone because like I get in touch with people, right? But I don't want to like compute. I I don't I don't need to compute. Let me just close it and and walk away. I have again like this isn't one of the computers are some of the most probably the most amazing tool humans have ever made. So, like I I I don't despise them, hate them, but I could take some time away from them. But I think time away from nature would bug me a whole lot more. If I couldn't go outside for a year, it'd bug me way more. You go insane.

センラ#132

事業の外で多くの時間を過ごし、インスピレーションは物理的なもの——時計、車、Concept 2——から来ている。将来ポッド以外をやるなら物理側だ、と僕も思う。数字は画面上でしかない。ConstellationのMark Leonardは、ソフトで何千万を何億にしても、いちばん充実した仕事は石壁を積んだことだ、と。30年後も「あれを作った」と指差せる。

EN

I Yes. Jump off the cliff.

センラ#133

なぜ物理からそんなにインスピレーションを?

EN

Right. Exactly. So, like, you know, I I want to be out. I want to be out there. I think it's just a wonderful So, so the screen is wonderful. Software is wonderful. Computers are incredible things. And that right now is like an amazing time for computers. Like one of the most amazing times since the web back in the late '9s or mid '90s really. Um and and it's cool to live through both of these moments. Um but I'd still rather um play with some bricks and and work on a stone wall even though I don't know how. Um like but that wouldn't pay my bills either. So I have to be practical. Like I built a great software company. I like this stuff a lot. I don't know how to build stone walls, but I wouldn't mind playing with them. The bills are taken care of. [laughter]

フリード#134

推測でしかない。味が好きな理由が説明できないのと同じ。現実感がある。触れる、質感。うちのソフトにもテクスチャがある——シミュレートだが。平坦なソフトが多い中で、グラデーションと色と線とテクスチャが好き。パティナ、経年。ソフトは同じ見た目のまま。レンガは年を取って良くなる。物理世界は僕たちそのものだ。そこから遠く離れすぎたくない。地面に寝そべる方が、空を飛ぶよりいい。歩いたり運転したり、地面に近い方がいい。

EN

The bills are, but I still I don't think you have to worry about that anymore.

フリード#135

ビーチで面白い模様の石を集め始めた。クリスタルではない。自然、テクスチャ、模様、色。デザイナーになりたてのころはロゴ本やコーポレートアイデンティティ本やPrint誌で名刺の色を見ていた。外に出ろ。葉はこれまでで最良のデザインだ。生き残って進化した。色が欲しければ鳥を見ろ。本ではなく。海、潮溜まり、光の反射。鳥肌が立つ。根本的にリアルだ。スクリーンもソフトも好きだが、浸かりすぎているからこそ、外も好きだ。

EN

No, the bills be very sore. The bills. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

センラ#136

スクリーンを愛してないと思う。売ったら二度とコンピュータを使わない、と言った。

EN

One of the people I most hope to get on the show and I want to talk to is Christopher Nolan.

フリード#137

今は好きだ。別のビジネスは始めない、と言った。ノートPCを閉じて、1年スクリーンなしでもいい。電話は連絡用に残す。コンピューティングは要らない。コンピュータは人類史上最高のツールのひとつだ。憎んではいない。でも自然から1年離されたら、もっと狂う。人は実際狂った。

EN

Have you ever like looked into his personal philosophy at all?

フリード#138

今はコンピュータの驚くべき時期だ。90年代半ばのウェブ以来。両方を生きているのはすごい。それでもレンガや石壁で遊びたい——やり方は知らないが。請求書はソフトで払ってきた。石壁27年ではどこにいたかわからない。

EN

Okay. So there's something that me, you and him, I think, have in common. He, you know, [clears throat] he desires to live in an analog world. I'm almost positive that's a direct quote. It might be me summarizing reading his biography.

センラ#139

出たいゲストの一人がChristopher Nolan。アナログの世界に生きたい、と。技術的に最先端の映画を作りながらスマホを持たない。GPSなしで道を聞く。脚本は物理印刷して、俳優の家まで飛んで手渡し、読み終わるまで待ち、回収する。

EN

And so if you think about the the justosition between like you make software, but you want to be on a hike outside, you know, you want to like look at the ocean, right?

センラ#140

僕もそうだ。プロダクトはデジタルでも、紙の本、対面、リモートポッドはしない。電話はするが、テキストより人と会いたい。アナログでいる方が気分がいい。

EN

He doesn't no he doesn't have a smartphone. So no GPS. He's got to go up to somebody like how do I get to the deli or whatever.

フリード#141

同意する。大事なのは内容そのものより、自分が誰か知っていることだ。何が好きかわかること。多くの人は他人が好きなものを好きになり、期待に生き、他人がやるべきだと思う事業を育てる。自分がない。見つかると素晴らしい。変わるかもしれないが、今好きなことを知っている。デジタルと物理の両方を愛してもいい。同じ塵の上に生きている。好きだと知って、美しいものに自分を扱うこと。

---

EN

If he wants you to be in his movie.

センラ#142

高校のころから自分用に作り、自分の判断を信じている。自分が誰か知るのは何歳くらいだった?

EN

Yeah.

フリード#143

比較的最近だと思う。何をしたいかがわかっていたが、自分が誰かはまだ完全にはわからない。誰も確信すべきでない。結婚と子供のあと、自分に来た感じがする。昔の自分には戻りたくない。

EN

Like oh email me the script.

センラ#144

怒りがあった、と言っていた?

EN

He's not emailing you the script. Okay. He is printing it out physically.

フリード#145

もっとパンクで、肩にチップがあった。若いころは証明が要る。競争心が出るのは誰かに軽く扱われたときだけ。ウェブデザイナーのころ、Dave Seagullのハイファイブ賞みたいなものに作品を出した。返事は「You suck. 別の仕事を探せ」。愛した。できない、足りないと言われるのが好きだ。身長170センチでバスケがそこそこできると、コートで舐められる。燃える。

EN

Yes.

フリード#146

一人で何ができる、学位がない——それでしばらく燃えた。でも打ち上げたあとに落ち着く地点が要る。51歳の今、40代で自分に収まってきた。サイケデリックな体験も助けになった。

EN

So I'm Christopher Christopher Nolan and I want you Jason on my uh in my movie. I'm showing up at your door. Yeah. here's the script and you're like great I'll read it and I'm sitting [clears throat] here

センラ#147

やったの? John Mackeyも勧めてくるが、僕は拒否している。

EN

till you're done reading it and then when you're done

フリード#148

なぜ?

EN

take it back it back

センラ#149

テックとベイエリアには素晴らしい会社もあるが、奇妙なことも薬物も多すぎる。頭が今のままでいい。いとこのヘロイン過剰死、父の薬物と服役。コカインで良い決断をした人を見たことがない。反対は薬物をやらないことだ、と決めた。

EN

amazing

フリード#150

説得する気はない。僕にとっての体験は、洞察の雪崩だった。好きなのは洞察だ。心が知らなかった見方で物事を理解できる。アイデアが三次元の物体で、回して裏側が見える——比喩ではなく、そういう感覚。存在の本質についての洞察も。何度かやったが、毎回「こんな見方をしたことない」のWowだ。甘い洞察だ。

EN

and and I feel that exact same way where it's like you know my your entire product is delivered you know digitally mine is too but I like to read physical books I like to be in person I will not do a remote podcast I now I've got to the point where I won't even go on other people's podcast remote like no no like let's go meet and like hang out I want to talk on the phone. If I can't be with you in person, I don't want to text you. I want to live in an analog world. I just feel better

センラ#151

自分をより知る助けになった?

EN

being outside, reading physical books, not looking at a goddamn screen.

フリード#152

それが目的ではなかった。より知ったというより、思っていたより広がった。50年代の車のラジオみたいに、針が一つの周波数——自分は95.7——にいる。サイケはダイヤルを少し回し、ずっとそこにあった別の周波数を聞かせてくれた。すべての経験が自分を知る鏡になる。巨大な突破というより、面白くてもう少し学びたくなった。

EN

I'm with you. And

フリード#153

余談だが、三次元パズルに行き詰まり、裏から見たら単純だった、という体験がある。すべてを裏返せ。裏側は本物、表は表層だ。どう応用するかは考えない。ただの洞察と啓示で、今は持っている。害のないレンズが増えるのはいい。ヘロインやコカインではない。医師でもなく売っているわけでもないが、自分には価値があった。

EN

So you told a story earlier when you're making products here like in high school and you're designing it just for you. You're the first user. That is an indication that you're comfortable trusting your own judgment. You just said it's really important to know who you are. At what age do you really think that you finally figured out who you are?

センラ#154

Rick Rubinの『The Creative Act』を読んだ? 似た考え方?

EN

I think probably more recently, frankly uh than than I I don't think I I think I knew what I liked like to do, but I don't think I I'm not sure I still know fully who I am, but I um that's the big question, right? Like who are we and the whole thing, right? I don't I don't totally feel like I should no one should be certain about that. But I feel like I've come more to my own actually since getting married and having kids. Looking back on who I maybe how I was, how I acted, how I was in the world. Um I'm glad I am who I am now than who who I wouldn't want to be that person again.

フリード#155

読んだとき「自分が書いた本か?」と思った。意味はわかるだろう。

EN

Why didn't you say you used to have like anger?

センラ#156

彼のエピソードもやった。魔法の世界、脳以外の知性、理解を超える世界、曖昧さに慣れる——君からもずっと聞こえる。

EN

I think I was Yeah, I was I was definitely like more of a punk, you know, like a young

フリード#157

道の思想——知らない、無理しない、しない——に近い。世界はある魔法の仕方で動く。形而上学というより、日々の「行き当たりばったり」のビジネス哲学だ。リスだ。流れに乗る誠実さ。感じ取り、注意を払い、信頼し、直感と腹を信じる。完全に直感と腹で動く。起業家という語も好きではない。プロダクトを作り、周りにビジネスが要り、回す。数字は見ない。黒字で、事業に十分な脂肪(blubber)があればいい。

EN

I don't know. I think I probably resented things for some reason. I was sort of I had a chip on my shoulder. Maybe that's part Maybe that was good. Like you got to prove yourself when you're getting when you're new into something and you're young and you're breaking in and people don't think you're any good at what you do. I the only time I'm ever competitive is is when someone slight me otherwise I I don't I I'm not competitive. So for whatever reason like if someone's like you can't do that or you guys aren't good enough or I remember this actually early on in my career when I was a web designer before I made software I just designed websites. Um, I submitted uh a website design to an award thing and I'm trying to remember what it might have been called the high- five award or something. I can't quite remember what it was and I can't remember the guy's name right now. Dave Seagull actually was his name. I do remember now. Back in the day getting an award from Dave Seagull, I think was his name, was like a big deal in the design community. So, I submitted a design and um he wrote me back saying like, "You suck. Literally, you suck. Um, find another day job." And I loved that. I loved that. That was like I loved that. I love when someone says you can't do something, you're not good at something. You know, maybe this come comes from being like, "I'm 5'7 and I'm pretty good at basketball." And you walk on the court and people don't think you're very good, you know? Like, I love that kind of stuff, right? So, so that just fired me up. So, as far as like finding confidence, like I think I probably had a lot of that early on where people are like, "You're just one guy. Like, how could you do this or how could you do that or you don't know what you're doing? You don't have a degree in this." Like, that kind of fired me up for a while. But there's a point where you want, this is like again to the point of like kind of like you want to sort of launch and then you want to find a find a place to settle where you you kind of just I think come into your own at a certain point. And um I think I probably did that in my 40s. I'm 51 now. So I think like in my 40s I probably came into my own actually settled into my own. Had some um psychedelic experiences which helped as well.

センラ#158

昨夜初めて「blubber」と言った。どういう意味?

EN

Did you?

フリード#159

昨夜初めて口に出た。タイトなマージンでミスが怖い事業は嫌だ。クッションのあるマージンが欲しい。失敗しても致命傷にならない。事業はいつか終わるが、リスクは取るが、農場を賭けるようなことはしない。農場を持っていて、なくてもいい、という感じ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#160

安全余裕。キャッシュ、高利益率。それでもコストは見る?

EN

John Mackey. I don't know if it it was in the episode. I can't remember. But this guy keeps trying to get me to do psychedelics. I think we talked about at the end I was like I'm not doing psychedelics. What did you do?

フリード#161

見る。Davidが書いた記事のように、クラウドを離れて約1000万ドル節約する。なぜそんな努力? 自分のお金だからだ。外部資金は要らない。何年もみんな金を出したがるが要らない。顧客の売上で稼ぐ。だから大切に扱い、コストを見る。事業を続けたいなら、唯一の競合はコストだ。

EN

Why not?

フリード#162

会社を小さく保つのもそのため。マーケには27年で誤差程度しか使っていない。無駄に使わず貯め、別の場所で楽しいミスを許す。食料品店のような1〜2%マージンはやりたくない。シリコンバレーのソフト会社が歴史上最高マージンの製品で巨額の赤字を出すのが信じられない。ビットでほぼゼロコストなのに何十億も燃やして一文も稼いでいない有名企業がある。無責任に見える。小さな事業のマインドセットかもしれないが、あの世界はわからない。

EN

Let's go. It's a conversation. You can do whatever you want. Um I don't I I think me and you both um bond over like there's some positive things obviously the tech industry and the Bay Area in San Francisco have created you know great companies and great products and stuff but there's also a lot of like

フリード#163

blubberは脂肪の蓄えだ。体脂肪6%は長く生きるには良くない。荒野に閉じ込められたら燃やすものが要る。ドットコム崩壊、2008、コロナ——骨まで削らず、骨の上に脂肪があった。

EN

um yeah, and I just I'm very resistant to doing drugs because I've also had like

フリード#164

LLCなので年末に残った金はメンバー——僕とDavidとキャップテーブルの他2人——へ。利益の10%は従業員へ。職位や給与ではなく勤続年数。月ごとにユニットが溜まり、10年で上限。10年のプリンシパルエンジニアも、10年のサポート(年9〜10万ドルでも)も同じ利益分配ボーナス。オプションもRSUも株式もクソだ(超確立した上場以外)。利益に基づく現金。27年黒字。2024年は62人中約20人が6桁ボーナス。毎年。頭金や学費や休暇に使える本物の現金。単純な事業、単純なキャップテーブル、LLC、本物の利益分配。競合の多くは株を約束してチャートは右下がり。気の毒だ。

EN

I've never seen somebody, you know, high on cocaine make a great decision like that. So it's like, you know, we we are we carry all the stuff that we we experienced earlier. And I'm like, well, what's the opposite of that? The opposite of that is not doing drugs. So, I'll just not do drugs.

センラ#165

Rick Rubinに戻る。40代のサイケ以前、35歳で10年目のころの内的独白はネガティブだった?

EN

I'm not here to convince you to do drugs.

フリード#166

もっと攻撃的だったと思う。魂があるように見えるが、昔はもっと。RBF(resting bitch face)だと言われ、写真家Mikeが送ってくる写真では「僕は幸せなのに」となる。今この会話も楽しい——明日もできるか、が成功の尺度だ。

EN

No, no, go for it.

フリード#167

でも35歳の自分はあまり覚えていない。振り返らない。 Jimmy Iovineが同じ椅子で「バックミラーはない」と言った。振り返りは、覚えていることについての自分語りで、たぶん真実ではなく歪んでいる。ビジネスのポストモーテムも好きではない。何かに時間をかけて振り返り、なぜそうなったかを探す。なぜかわからないのが一般的だ。信じる理由を見つけるが、もう一度やったら違うかもしれない。一言の言い方が違ったかもしれない。

EN

Well, that's not why I did it. Okay. I don't think I know myself better, but I I feel more expansive now that that there's more than I thought I knew. Like, um, here's how I kind of thought about it afterwards. Um, you have to picture an old car radio from maybe like the 50s or something, you know, like an old pickup truck had a car radio with a needle and you could move, you know, move the dial and the needle moves, right? Get the little glass window with all the channels and you're you're in one of the channels. That's where you are all the time. You're in this channel. 95.7 is is is you. And psychedelics like let me turn the knob a little bit and tune into something else that's always been there. But I couldn't I couldn't hear that frequency. Like it's amazing. Then you're like I if you look at a radio and you turn the knob, you're picking up things that are there that you can't hear until you turn the knob. That's what it was like for me. and how does it make me a better whatever or know myself better? I I think all experiences help you know yourself better. So, it's just a mirror and a reflection and a and a detail and a and a and a and a crumb that creates the pile of you. I don't really know. It's not like that was a huge breakthrough for me, but it was fascinating enough to do it a few more times and learn a few more things that were just fascinating. Um, like one thing I'll just share, it's a little bit of an aside, but again comes back to this object thing. And maybe this is like maybe this is me seeing how my mind works that way because we talked about objects before, but I remember having this experience where I was just like puzzling through this like three-dimensional puzzle and being stumped by it, but but enjoying the problem solving. And then I finally like just again this is like conceptual and metaphorical and not like so literal but I I turned it around and saw it from the back and it was dead simple. And it what what it basically told me was um turn everything around. This is like invert. Everything's a lot simpler from behind. Everything's real. The back of things are real. The front of things are fronts. The back of things are real. So what does that mean? How do I apply that? Like I don't try to apply that. This is like not trying. It's just an an insight and a revelation that like get behind something to really know what it is. Again, I don't like constantly refer to this, but it's it's something that now I have that I didn't have before and I'm very glad I have it. So that's like part of that. It's it's like it's just seeing through a different lens and like I'd rather have a few more lenses available to me if I can that are like harmless. This is not heroin, cocaine, and that kind of stuff. But again, I'm not here to sell any of these things, and I'm not a doctor and all all the disclaimers, right? Um, but I would say it's a it was a very worthwhile experience for me.

フリード#168

確実性が欲しければ、自分を説得して見つける。興味がない。学びたいならもう一度作り、前へ進むことで学ぶ。ミスから学ぶ、と言うが、やり直すことはできない。嫌なら二度とやらない——それが学びで1秒でわかる。新しいことをやって学ぶ。誇れない自分を免責するのではなく、そのときの自分で、前へ進む。

EN

Yes.

センラ#169

ネガティブな内的独白を聞きたかったのは、Rickの答えが近いと思ったからだ。絶え間ない不満のエンジンはあるか、と聞かれて——

EN

Do you think you're you think about things similarly to him?

フリード#170

推測していい? そのときできた以上のことはできなかった、という答え?

EN

Yeah. When I read that book, I was like, did I write this book? Not like really, you wrote the book, but but but you know what I mean? Like

センラ#171

かなり近い。彼は「やった仕事に満足している。続けられて興奮している。楽しい。他に何をするかわからない。作るのが好きで、惑星にいる理由だ。もっと良くできたならまだ作り続けていた。できうる最善を尽くした。それ以上はできない。批判するものはない。日記の1エントリのようなもの」。

EN

I just I just read it, just an episode on it. And when I hear you speak, I'm like, you he's he's just like, we live in a magic world. A lot of stuff's not you have a you have an intelligence that is not coming from your brain.

フリード#172

100%同じだ。やったことをやった。最善でも最悪でも、それがやったことで、次は? 人にクソになれという意味ではない。他の人も覚えている。良い誠実な人でいたい。でも「だから何でもしていい」という言い訳にも聞こえるかもしれない。歴史に書かれる結果はある。最善を尽くそうとしてきた。

EN

Uh the world is beyond your comprehension. You have to be comfortable with, you know, ambiguity and not knowing. And I just feel I hear that from you constantly.

フリード#173

だから数字に戻る。収益目標はない。黒字であること以外。売上目標、ユーザー目標もない。最善の仕事をする。目標が仕事を良くするのではない。仕事への誇りと真剣さと楽しさが良くする。今やっている仕事が目標だ。測定が嫌いなのもそのため。プロダクトが測定だ。数字は良いものを作った副産物で、理由ではない。

EN

which is just kind of going a bit more with the flow of where things go. This is the squirrel. Like

フリード#174

人は確実性を探し、見つからない。機械のラインで円がずれたなら原因を追える。でも大半の事業は決断・アイデア・タイミング・市場・競合・その日の気分・ニュースの連続で、一点を特定して「次はこうする」と確信するのは危険だ。

EN

Yeah, sure.

センラ#175

Basecampを今日もう一度作れない、と言うのもそのため?

EN

You mentioned this point like

フリード#176

絶対に無理。無理。無理。

EN

your business should have some blubber [laughter]

センラ#177

会社を売って「会社作りが得意だ」と思った友人が、二発目がうまくいかず自分を疑うのを何度も見た。なぜ成功したかわからない、が大事だ。

EN

and it's very memorable. What does that mean to you?

フリード#178

なぜ失敗したかも、なぜうまくいったかも、わからない。本当にそう思う。

EN

Um and I had not said that before until last night. the word blubber just came to me which is just like I don't want to run a very tight margin business where I can't make mistakes or I'm afraid of them. So I I I believe in in in in cushy margins so so we can screw up and it won't matter that much. I mean it can matter obviously. Again I'm not oblivious to the reality like businesses can go out of business. They do all the time. All of them do eventually basically at some point. We take risks. we don't put ourselves at risk is kind of how I like to think about this. So, I'm willing to take plenty of risks, but I'm not going to do something that's going to bet the farm unless we like had to. And if I'm at the point where I have to, I feel like it's over already anyway. Frankly, I'm not interested in betting the farm. It's just not even that fun. Um, I'd rather just have the farm and then not have the farm.

センラ#179

成功した会社を持つこと自体、人類史上ごくわずか。それを祝うために番組を始めた。でもそれを手放したあとが破壊的だ。Trader Joe'sのJoe——自伝の9割は愛した事業の構築。70年代か80年代に恐れから売却し、その後数十年。最後の10%は投資や不動産やコンサル。最終段落で「自分に認めなければならない。売るのを後悔している」。本が出た同じ週に亡くなった。

EN

So, big margin of safety is the way of safety. A lot of cash, high profit margins. You still pay attention to your

フリード#180

知っている人がいる。30代で大きく売り、金を得て、あと数十年あるのに「またできる」と信じ、大半は同じ高さに届かない。100回跳ぶと最初の跳びには届かない。次に良いものを建てても、前ほど偉大に見えず、悲劇だ。

EN

Yeah, we pay attention to costs. Like when we talk about cutting cost like we we just David wrote this great article about like getting off the cloud is going to save us something like 10 million bucks and whatever it is. Uh and and it's like

フリード#181

今はそれほど恐れないが、Davidといつもネガティブ・ビジュアライゼーションをする。AIで景色が変わりSaaSが3年で死んだら? 答えは、27年、そのころは30年、素晴らしいランだった。誇りと幸運を感じるべきで、「最悪だ」ではない。そのあと別のビジネスは始めない。他のことをする。もう一度同じスタミナと飢えはない。好奇心はあるが足りない。初期の攻撃性と先駆者のエネルギーは戻らない。

EN

So the blubber, if we're going to blubber, let's go back to the blubber.

フリード#182

Bob Dylanが60 Minutesで、昔の歌詞を暗唱しつつ「ああいう曲はもう書けない。どうやったかわからない。でも今は他のことができる」と言った。成熟だ。起業家がアイデンティティで、売ったあとも起業し続けなければと連続性を求め、高さに届かず失望する友人を見るのは悲しい。あの瞬間にincredibleだったことを見られない。

EN

so so you know, we've lived through, you know, dot crash, 2008 stuff, co like

フリード#183

サイケの話に一瞬戻る。最後はマッシュルーム。ガイドに、前回すごい体験をした曲をもう一度かけてと頼んだ。かかったが、空白で空っぽだった。笑いが込み上げた。同じ体験は二度できない。二度受ける資格もない。当時は当時、今は今。切り離されていて同じにはなりえない。 子供にも使う。11歳の子との今の体験は、12歳になったら二度とない。今を味わい、二度と来ないと知り、悲しむのではなくそうだと認める。持ち歩く洞察だ。

EN

No, I think I was just more aggressive.

センラ#184

美しい。成功の定義でいちばん良かったのはSteve Jobs——誇れるものを作ったか? ポッドのリスナー数ではない。

EN

I don't know how I'm coming off. I'm not I tried to be pretty. No, you're like a soulful dude.

フリード#185

いい。僕の定義は、翌日もう一度やりたいか? イエスなら成功。自分を傷つけた、誇れないことを言った——もうやりたくない。今知っているうえで再雇用するか、と同じ質問。お金ではない。もう一度時間を使いたいか。

EN

Well, I don't know. Like I don't know. Sometimes I have a scowl and people think like I I I was probably a lot more

センラ#186

単純を複雑にする人間の傾向の話で、RickがJimmy Iovineに初めて会ったときの話を思い出す。レジェンドのJimmyが若いRickの曲を聴き「あんなにシンプルなものがまだ作れたらいいのに」。Rickは「できるでしょ、経験もあるし」と。ポイントは、知らないことを知らないうちに美しい単純ができ、経験とともに足して複雑にしてしまうこと。

EN

It's not a scowling face. The kids call it RBF.

フリード#187

足すのが傾向だ。退屈への恐れ、もっとやれという期待、外部資金で成長を強いられ、なぜ始めたかとの接続を失う。自分の事業ではなく他人の事業を走らせ、自分のために他人のための仕事を作る。単純なものに層を足して別方向に爆発させる。良くなる人もいるが、多くの場合悪くなる。降りられない一本のレールになる。

EN

RBF.

フリード#188

いちばん大事なのは独立だ。黒字=使うより多く稼ぐ=独立。誰にも何をしろと言われない。Davidとよく言う——「誰も許してくれないことをやるべきだ。やろう」。興奮はそこにある。

EN

You're like I'm happy. Exactly.

フリード#189

クリーニング店もピザ屋もVCを集めない。世界の大半の事業はそうだ。うちの業界はアイデアを持って金を集める。集めた瞬間、ほとんどすべての選択肢を切る。機会が広がった気がして、ほぼすべての出口を閉じる。大きなビジネスになるか失敗か、一択。大金持ちになる人もいる。大半は「良い事業」だった地点を突き抜け、「他人には不十分」になる。金が要る事業を作り、資金が止まり、解雇し、崩壊する。選択肢は一つしかない。

EN

and this is how I know I'm going to do this for a long time. I'm like this is so much fun. Can I do it again tomorrow?

フリード#190

オプション性のファンだ。IPOできる——したくない。資金調達——したくない。PEに売る——したくない。辞める——したくない。事業が続く限り続けられる。それが金だ。金を得て何でもできるという蜃気楼ではなく、できることは「大きなビジネスを建てる」一択だと気づいてほしい。

EN

While we're talking. So, but like my face just like

センラ#191

タイムレスなものに引かれている。Rolexのデザインが時代とともに足されたツイートや、Porsche 911。

EN

I know. Yeah. Anyway, um I I think I was more maybe aggressive or I I don't even I I kind of don't remember myself actually. Like I'll just pull it back to something else then I'll come back to this thing in my mid30s perhaps. But we don't do like postmortems. I don't look back on things. I don't like to look back on things. Actually, Jimmy Aine sat in that exact same chair and he said, "I have no rearview mirror."

フリード#192

RolexかもしれないしOmega Speedmasterかもしれない。1960年代のデザインはほぼ完璧。要るものだけ。2010の更新版は足されている。新しいのが悪いとは言わない。最初の純粋さが引く。アイデアの最純粋な形。1963年のDaytonaは、古いからではなく、概念の最純粋な実行だから美学的に好きだ。その後は売るためにモデルを重ねた層だ。最初の版を売り続けるのは世界のやり方ではない。

EN

Yeah. No.

センラ#193

純粋さ。エッセンス?

EN

So, you're like, "What were you like at 35?" Like, "H, I don't probably more aggressive, but I don't really know." And I'll tell you why. I I don't like to look backwards. First of all,

フリード#194

エッセンスの部分もある。フランス語で言うと……わからない。純粋さだ。最初のアイデア、最初のコンセプト、三次元での最初の実行。昔のジムにあった古いConcept 2を見ると、素材は良くなったがアイデアの純粋さは昔からあり、同じものだ。ブランドへの愛着が増す。足すためではなく、本当に良くするために足しているのが見える。時計の新しい文字盤色のような「売るための足し」ではない。

EN

backwards is a story you're telling yourself about what you remember about something. And it's probably not true. And it's probably perverted in a million different ways. And there's a million different things that have happened to you that cause you to be the way you were and all the things like I I don't know what any of them are. And the reason I don't like the postmortems in business, and I know a lot of businesses do this, they do they launch something, they spend all this time and energy looking back on it, trying to figure out why it did what it did. And my my general sense is you'll have no effing idea why it did what it did. You're going to find some reasons that you're going to believe. But had you done that again, it may have turned out differently. Who knows? One little thing could have been different. The way you said something could have been different. the time. Who knows, right? Like, if you want to find certainty, you're going to find it because you'll convince yourself of it. I just don't have any interest in looking back. I'd rather learn by doing something again, making making more things. So, if you draw a line like people like, well, you should learn from your mistakes. I I'm not sure what you can learn from them. Frankly, I think you learn from moving forward and doing something. You learn by doing. You can't redo what you did. You learn by doing. So, if you don't like something that you did and you kind of have it in your head, just don't do that again. like that's the learning. It takes one second to know that and move on and learn by doing new things. So I don't like to look back now. Um that's not like absolving myself of of things I'm not proud of that I but I don't it's like that's who I was when I did the things and that's that. So like I'm moving forward. So I want to pull up pull up something. The reason I asked the question about the the negative inner monologue it's very common with you know a lot of people. Yeah. And um Rick, we've been talking a lot about Rick Rubin and I love his answer to this which I it sounds like if I had if you were going to ask if I was going to ask you this question now, you would answer in a similar way. So he was asked the question, do you have an engine of constant dissatisfaction, self-criticism that I could have done better? And his answer was almost

センラ#195

足しているが良くしていない。もう一つのバイラルはスマート家電のエッセイ。両親のために借りた新築がタッチ画面だらけ。Nestは良いが、天気まで出す四角いサーモスタットや巨大アラームパネル。食洗機は初回アプリ登録なしでは動かない。母が皿を洗えない。足して良くしていない。

EN

Can I guess? I don't know what it is.

フリード#196

その洞察そのものだ。ラグいUI、メニューの奥のスケジュール、今の温度か設定温度かわからない。作った人が自宅に入れてるはずがない。仕様書のための製品。テレビはオンではなくブートで12秒メニュー。昔はつけたチャンネルがすぐ出た。大退行だ。サーモスタットは悪くなった。Nestは例外で認める。車の大画面もTesla以外はダメで、つまみとボタンに戻り始めている。触覚がなく視線が要り、筋記憶が効かない。

EN

Okay.

フリード#197

技術は悪くなり、また学び直せる。最新の家でどれほど後退しているかを見て啓示だった。ライトスイッチの使い方をウォークスルーで説明された——最高のUIはオンオフのスイッチだ。ローマのコンクリートのように失われた技術で、いつか再発見される。進歩の余地はあるが、退行もある。うちの業界がそれを売っているのが残念だ。

EN

Very close. Yeah. So he goes

センラ#198

Rickの容赦ない編集——30曲から5曲の「これなしでは生きられない」を選び、完璧な5曲アルバムにしてから6・7曲目を足すか。足して良くなるか。1963 Daytonaに足すものはない。完璧だ。Porsche 911のシルエット——マリブの山火事の焼けた911がすぐ911とわかった。

EN

and I believe that to be true like

センラ#199

Jerry Seinfeldの「用量が大事」——45分で最高、1時間15分で「え」。止めるのが難しい。複雑さを足すのを止めるのが難しい。

EN

Very fascinating. Everything we make is a reflection in a moment in time. Could be a day or could be a year. 100%. That's exactly how I see things, which is I did what I did. I did the best I could or the worst I could. Whatever it is, it it was what I did and there it goes. Now what? like that doesn't mean be an … to people and like just you can be an … like that people other people remember what you did too. So like they'll remember what you did. So you you want to just be a good honest person anyway but like this some people might hear this that's why I'm saying this. Some people might hear this and go well that's an excuse to just do whatever the hell you want. There's no ramifications to any of these things. There are ramifications to these things but they are written in history and that is that I've always just tried to do the best I can. This is why I'm going to tie this back to to numbers. It's like we don't have revenue targets except for like I want to be profitable. I don't have sales targets, revenue targets, user targets. I don't have any of these things. We just do the best work we can. Like a target shouldn't make me do better work. I should do better work because of the pride I take in the work that I do. Like and and the seriousness in which I take the work that I do and the enjoyment in in the work that I do. Like I'm going to do the best I can. That's what I do. That's all I can do. That's all I should be doing and I don't need something to try to tell me that I could do better had I aimed for some target. The target is the work I'm doing now. That's the best I can do. So fully on board. He said it more eloquently than I did. But that's how I've always felt about this stuff. Which is why I don't like measurement. I just like the product. The product is the measurement, not the number things that people have done in it, used it and whatever. I it is what it is. the number, the money is ultimately like the the the byproduct of making something good. It's not the reason to do it. People are in search of certainty all the time. And I think it's nowhere to be found. Um and so but but it makes people very uncomfortable not to know like why this happened or and by the way, I shouldn't say it's not to be found. Like if you're making widgets on a on a on a on a line and like all the widgets supposed to have a circle in the middle and all of a sudden the circle's off like you can trace that back to where the machine went offline and like you can figure out some of these things. Of course, if like they're mechanical and you can you can track it all down, but like most businesses are not mechanical in that way. They are a series of decisions, ideas, timing, market conditions, competitor conditions, perhaps your mood on a given day, all the way it rolled out, what other news was happening in the day, the thing like to try to pinpoint the answer and then to go, okay, now next time we know not to do or to do and to feel like you now know something that you actually don't know, but to be so certain that you do because you figured it out. I think it's really dangerous. Is that why I've heard you say a few times that you don't think you you could start you could do base camp again today?

センラ#200

Johnny Cashの『Hurt』——21歳のTrent Reznorの後悔と、75歳で戻れない男の深さ。ギターとボーカルは50年前も今も美しい。エッセンスに戻る。

EN

The amount of friends that I have that sold a company and just thought like I'm like I'm good at company building and then their second shot is not going well or ended in failure and really made them question who they are.

フリード#201

Bezosが最初に会ったころ言った——変わらないものに焦点を当てろ。変わるものは多い。10年後、Amazonのカスタマーサービスが悪くなってほしい人はいない。配送が遅く、価格が高く、品揃えが減ってほしい人もいない。速く、豊富で、良いサービス、公正な価格——変わらない核心に投資し、他は探索していいが基本を見失うな。エッセンス・純粋さ・コアを見失いやすい。退屈に感じ、「別のことを」となる。

EN

I think that's actually an important thing to say. It's like maybe you know you don't know why it actually succeeded.

センラ#202

長く会社を回す人が稀なのもそのためだ。初期ゲストの平均在籍は30年くらい。君は「ハードに働いていない」と言うが、昨夜計算した——週40時間×27年は約5万4000時間。同じことに5万4000時間使った人はどれだけいる? ごくわずか。時間に広げている。

EN

I think that's true. You don't know why it didn't work and you don't know why it worked.

フリード#203

意図したわけではない。レンガを積んでいただけ。積み上がる。長く続くものへの敬意はずっとある。昔The Distanceというポッドをやって、25年以上の事業を扱った。家族経営の小さな事業が多い。正しくいくつかのことをやり続けた。長く続くなら偶然ではない。一過性の熱は流行だ。長く続くのは繰り返し正しい何かがある。薄いマージンでも、他よりそれをやり続けたいなら、持続可能で、それが偉大な事業だ。

EN

I really think that's true.

センラ#204

葉の話と同じ——永遠に進化してきた。Mark Spitznagelの『The Dao of Capital』には針葉樹の章がある。極限環境で生き残る木から事業の洞察を引いている。

EN

But it's people don't understand how devastating that is where you sold a successful company. First of all, it's almost nearly impossible to build a successful company like just a tiny percentage that humans have that have ever existed have been able to accomplish this goal. This is why I started one of the shows cuz I want to celebrate the people that have done this and say, "Hey, if you want a role model, maybe we should, you know, people that build companies and products that make other people's lives better. Those are maybe good people to like listen to hear speak. They probably know some … if they've been doing it for multiple decades. Turns out, you know, they have a lot of wisdom or they've acquired a lot of knowledge in that. But it's so devastating to have had that. And then in in the case I always think of Trader Joe, you know, cuz again, talk about different you me and you bond over the fact that like we want to make products that are different. Yeah. I'm not interested in making a me too product.

フリード#205

うちの事業をオークの木だと思っている。オークが好きだ。安定し、嵐に耐え、成長は遅い。中西部のバロオークは遅いが長く持ち、嵐を耐える。綿の木は速く育ち、うるさく、散らかし、75年で倒れる。派手でなくていい。静かに、良い事業、堅い基盤、毎年少し足して安定し、嵐を耐える。

EN

Doesn't Yeah.

フリード#206

テックでは常に「〇〇キラー」「Basecampキラー」が出る。長くいるとその繰り返しが見える。嵐を耐え、生き残るものは少ない。熱い時期はあるが、いちばん難しいのは居続けること。どう競争する? 他の誰より長く居る

EN

Yeah.

センラ#207

伝記で何度も出る——運が回ってくるまでゲームに居続ける。コカ・コーラと冷蔵、Shopifyとコロナなど。Tobiも「正しいやり方は一つではなく百ある」と言った。

EN

Then lives another few decades.

フリード#208

信じる。

EN

I think three at least three maybe four decades like a long time. And the la, you know, last like 10% is like, "Yeah, I, you know, did some investing. I did some real estate. I did consulting." But then the last paragraph is like he he's like, "I must admit something to my own self. I wasn't true. I regret selling.

センラ#209

僕の格言は、時間は唯一信頼できるフィルタだ。事業、アイデア、本、人。Charlie Mungerの「値する信頼の継ぎ目のない網」。高品質かは時間でしかわからない。Buffettの『Snowball』を再読中で、20〜40代の友人が70・80代まで続く。時間は事業の重量のほとんどを運ぶ。生き残ること——blubber、安全余裕、小さな単位。

EN

Thanks for listening. Joe Columbo or I don't know how to pronounce his last name. I don't know how to pronounce anything. Joe, I'll call him Joe Colbo. Your accent, please. Do your

フリード#210

余談だが価格にもつながる。Basecampは月299ドルが上限。ユーザー数に関係なく、それ以上は払わせない。競合は月5万ドル・2000席を取る。要らない。欲しいのは静的で均質な顧客群だ。古いテレビの砂嵐の点のように、だいたい同じ大きさ。ランダムに10社失っても(失いたくはないが)大丈夫なら良い事業。100社でも大丈夫ならさらに良い。失えない外れ値の大口が欲しくない。

EN

But then he goes, you know, uh, thanks for listening. Joe Colombo book gets published. He dies the same week." Oh yeah.

フリード#211

価格を均して、誰も他より多く払えないようにすると、小さな単位としての顧客が並ぶ。1社抜いてもジェンガのように全体が倒れない。ソフトを顧客ベース全体のために開発でき、大口数社のために開発しなくていい。エンタープライズは席を積みクジラを獲る。面白くないし、耐久性もない。耐久性はたくさんの小さなもので、削られても残りが多いことだ。

EN

And I always think about that when you're like, you know,

センラ#212

何度も踊ってきたが、君はすべて直感だ。直感とは? どう磨く?

EN

this guy's life, you could tell he's full of regret.

フリード#213

直感は、居心地の良い決断をすること。周りを見て注意を払うが、最終的に人間の決断をして支える。どこから来たか一点では定義できない、たくさんのものの集合が決断に至る。腹と直感で動く。価格も機能も新製品も名前も。テストもフォーカスグループもしない。A/Bはたまに遊びで。スプレッドシートで決断したことは一度もない。数字があるからといって、他の感覚より重く扱わない。愚かさはしない——スーパーボウルに5000万は投げない。直感にも限界がある。でもやることは、やりたいこと、感じること。「結果にかかわらず、これでいい」と感じること。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#214

時間とともにどう磨いた?

EN

Full of regret.

フリード#215

やるだけだ。決断する。曲線の下の面積——決断の量と時間。積極的に練習するのではなく、決断を重ねるほど研がれる。エッジが取れ、滑らかな球体のように手に収まる。正しい決断だと感じ、恐れず、興奮し、間違えても大丈夫だと知る。その立場にいられる幸運。誰にも止められない。直感が天井にぶつかってノーと言われ続けると楽しめない。使うことが要る。独立とオプション性に戻る。

EN

Yeah. I I know people like that.

センラ#216

この仕事のいちばんクールなところは、15年読み、考え方を形作ってくれた人と友人になり、一緒に時間を過ごし、番組に出てもらって、好きなところをみんなに共有できることだ。今日は本当にありがとう。最高だった。

EN

Yeah.

フリード#217

楽しかった。呼んでくれてありがとう。やってくれてありがとう。

EN

Uh and it tends to happen like in your 30s once you've like built this big thing and sold the first thing and you're like, I'm loaded now. I'm going to do Decades left. And and and and it's not arrogance. It's just like belief like, oh, I can do that again. And some people can't. Most people cannot. or if they can, they don't reach the same height. And so they're like jumping and like it's like if you if you try to jump a hundred times, like you you can't get to those first jumps because you're tired. And that's just what ends up happening. And so then they might build something great, but they can't see the greatness in it because it's not as great as the thing before. And that's even more tragic is that they can't see something that's still an incredible achievement, but it's not the same. and other people will see it as less than and it's just a terrible outcome. I'm afraid of it not so much now anymore, but um David and I talk about this all the time, which is we do negative visualization and and like practicing like what if this just like AI like what what if this just changes the whole damn landscape and like SAS is just dead in three years. Our answer is well we had a great run like 27 years amazing and by that time maybe 30 years of what a run like we should be happy and proud of that experience not like oh damn that sucks that we're out of this now more like we should we should be enjoying this and I hope we sure did cuz that's a rare and fortunate experience to even have that experience. Um but I wouldn't go like I wouldn't go and start another business after that. I would just do something else. else. I don't know what it would be, but I just I wouldn't want to try to do this again because I don't think I could. I don't think I could. And I and I think it's totally fair to admit like I don't think I'm good enough again to do what I did before. I don't have the stamina. I don't have the drive. I don't have the thirst and the hunger to build a brand new software company from scratch again. I just don't. I would have the curiosity, but I know that wouldn't carry me enough. I had like probably early on I was again more aggressive, younger, pumped, you know, was early days of like we we were pioneers like there's that kind of like energy that you have that you just don't have again. And it's fun. It's fun to have again. One of the great I saw um I think it was Bob Dylan was being interviewed on C 60 minutes and they were I think it was like morally safer or something was asking him like about songwriting and he was saying something I don't know if you've seen this quote but it's great. He was saying talking about like he was like reciting one of his great songs. I forget the name of the song or whatever. And he's like still has an incredible memory to remember these incredible lyrics. And he's like, "I used to be able to write music like that or write I'm paraphrasing. I used to be able to do There was a certain magic to that. I don't know how I did that. I know I couldn't do it again, but I can do other things now." And when I saw that, I'm like, that is a mature I mean, he's in his 80s now. I hope he's mature. But that is a mature human being to go, I could do that before. I don't really know how I did it. Somehow I did it. I can't do it anymore, but I can do other things. And I think that's important because like if you identify as an entrepreneur and you sell your business, like if your identity is tied up into entrepreneurship, like you have to go start another business because you have to there's continuity there that you have to be that person again. And then if you can't again can't achieve the heights like you just you feel like you're disappoint a disappointment. I've seen this in in friends who who've sold businesses and it's just like it's so sad to me to see that in them when they can't just see that what they did was incredible in that moment. Like it's these are moments that you have. These are periods of time that you have. These are experiences you have. And that's what happened in that time. Actually, can I go back to psychedelics for a second? I'm going to tell you a little story. I don't know if it's it's good or not, but it's meaningful to me. Um, the last time I did these are mushrooms, by the way. So, last time I did mushrooms, um, I remember going into it telling the guide I did it with, um, the I did it the first time and I had this incredible experience to this one song. She was playing different songs, had this one song that had this like experience where I just felt like I I learned everything like in a in an instant. Um, another next time I did it, I'm like, "Can you play that song again at some point? I want to see if I have that experience again." And so she was, "Maybe, we'll see, you know, whatever." And so at some point, I was aware enough that she played the song and I had no experience. It was blank and empty. And after the song ended, I broke out in laughter. And I go, "Of course, you cannot have the same experience again. You cannot have the same experience twice. You don't deserve the same experience twice. It's not even possible to relive something again. That thing happened then and this is now. They are detached. They're separate. They can never be the same." And it was a wonderful thing. So I've now used that like with my kids like I'm like my kids are growing up. They're 11 and seven. Like I'm never going to have the experience with my 11-year-old again as an 11-year-old. Once he's 12, he's 12. Like I can't have that again. So, you have to really savor those things now and recognize that they are what they are now and you will never get them again. And don't be sad about that. It just it just is. And that's the kind of stuff that like I those experiences that I that I had on those uh in in those times really like those are the things I carry with me um and hopefully do affect the way I I move through the world now today. It's good. That's great. I think that's great. The other way, the way I think about it is, would I want to do this again the next day? Just this whatever this was like, would I want to do it again? If the answer is yes, then it was successful. Like, I wouldn't want to if if if I hurt myself, I wouldn't want to do that again. If I was wasn't proud of what I said, I wouldn't want like it's a very it's the same thing like knowing what I know now, would I hire this person again? It's the same question like would I want to do this whatever I just did again? If so, it's successful. And I think that that's enough of a definition for me. It's not about money. It's not about It's not about any of those things. It's like, would I want to do it again? Would I want to spend my time doing that again? Playing replay. And and uh I know it wouldn't be the same outcome, but the experience of it would be different, but it would still be the same trajectory. I'd like to like do that thing again. You were speaking earlier about like humans propensity to take something simple and make it complex. Even though we crave simplicity, we have poor complexity, we kind of trend in the the this the trajectory of making things just more complex. I don't know why when you were speaking this came to my mind, but one of my favorite um podcast episodes ever was back in 2023, Rick Rubin interviewed Jimmy I oh I wish I could still make something that simple Yeah, it sounds [clears throat] like an incredible thing to have like a skill to have basically. I Yeah, I think um that is the trend is it is it is to just to to add more things. I mean naturally and part of it is because you feel like well people get bored of things and so they have to kind of expand the things or like there's expectations to add do more and people put a lot of pressure on themselves as business owners where they take money from the outside world and they have to grow a certain amount because they have to return the the investment and all of a sudden they've they've unmed themselves. They've lost uh connection with why they started this in the first place. They're no longer running their own business. They're running someone else's business. They're now they just created a job for themselves working for someone else. Um, that's what can happen when you when you when you just like when you've just taken when you've taken the simple thing that you had and added a layer to it that just blows it up in a different direction. Like in some cases it makes it worse. I mean for some people it makes it better, right? But like I think for a lot of people it makes it worse because now you're on a track which you can't get off. Like there's only one outcome that works. This is optionality. Let me let me get into this. My my feeling in general is that businesses like okay the most important thing to me is in business is independence which is profitability is also the same actually the same thing as long as I make more money than I spend I can stay in business that's independence independence is also no one can tell us what to do we actually feel obligated to do things nobody would allow us to do that's like a thing David and I talk about all the time like we should do this no one would let us do this let's do it you know that that's like the exciting stuff for us is stuff we're not supposed to be doing that to me is like just a big part of it. And I think what ends up happening is this is like so funny because like there's no there's no dry cleaner who's raising VC money, right? There's no pizza shop who's raising VC money. So most businesses in the world are not like this. But in my industry, like a lot of people have an idea and go raise money. And the moment they go raise money, they've cut off almost every option. They think they've expanded their experience and their opportunities, but they've cut off almost every possible off-ramp outcome because now they have to be in big business or they fail. That's it. That's one option. I mean, some people become very rich doing that, like if that's what they want to do. But most people blow right through what would have been a good business and is now not good enough for someone else. And once it's not good enough for someone else, that's got to be a shitty place to be. as an entrepreneur thinking that you just gave up this thing that was actually a good business but it's not good enough anymore. Then you can't get more money. You built a business to raise more money. You built a business that needs more money. Now you got to lay people off. Now it just falls apart and it's like over because you you have no options except one. I'm a big fan of optionality. We could go IPO. I don't want to. We could raise money. I don't want to. We could raise more money. I don't want to. We could sell to PE. I don't want to. Like we could quit. I don't want to. Like these are all options that we have. We can keep going for as long as we want as as long as the business survives. It's like we can do that, right? That is gold to me is optionality. And and I'd like to see more people think that way because I think it'll benefit them and and not cut themselves off when even they think there's like this this mirage that like, oh, I got a bunch of money and like I can do anything now. No, you can't. You can do one thing. Build a big business. That's not a lot of things. You feel I feel you have you're attracted to like timeless things. You have two uh tweets. One of them just went viral and it it's related to like this this you know basically craving simplicity uphoring complexity. One was about was it the design of a Rolex over time and they just start was it that the brand of it was some kind of watch. Which brand was it? but you you were showing pictures from like I think let's just say it's Rolex. Look at this Rolex design in 1960. Look at all the other stuff they added. Why are you drawn to the first? Purity is the way that's the word that comes to mind. Purity. I mean essence [laughter] That's a great point. You know, you're adding it adding to it, but you're not making it better. So, that's the second viral tweet where you kind of laid out this huge essay about smart electronics. God, my parents were visiting um for a couple months, so we rented them a house down the street. So, they had some more room. That's They like the room. So, we rent them a house uh and uh it's a brand new construction house, so we like, "Oh, it's nice. There'll be no issues, you know, no leaks and no issues." So, we get in the house and like like most new construction, it's got digital … everywhere, right? Like the thermostats aren't like thermostats that you can just like turn anymore. They're like touchcreens. And some of those are good. Like Nest is good. This doesn't have Nest. Like Nest is a great product. The round dial just updated that cuz it's such a good design. These are like rectangular and big and have the weather forecast on them and like [clears throat and laughter] to do the dishes. Exactly. That is your insight is exactly right. adding it, not doing not making it better. The alarm panel is slow and laggy. The the thermostats are um like they say a number on them and you're like, is that the current temperature or the temperature I want it to be? Like I changed the temperature, but then there's a schedule which I can't quickly simply modify because it's like in this little menu structure with this little laggy UI and you're like who does anyone use this? Like the people who built this certainly don't have this in their house. There's no way. [laughter] There's no way they have this in their house, right? This [snorts] is not a product built by people who are using the product they're building. This is a product built to specifications. Someone imagined this. There's this whatever. I don't know. I don't actually know how that happens. I I'm baffled by how it happens. The TVs, you know, now like, you know, and I don't this is not like I'm not like a lite oldtimer thing, but like you don't turn the TV on anymore. You boot the TV up and it takes like 12 seconds to get a menu before you can before. Like again, like there were some things that were better before. the way I see it's like that has not been discovered yet cuz had I mean it had been but that had been forgotten. This is like an old technology from the Romans or something like how do they build concrete so well? Like we still don't know today how the Romans built concrete so well that lasted so long. Like there's a lost art there. I feel like the light switch is a lost art. It's just like gone and it will be rediscovered one day and people oh my god this is so much better than this like damn technical … you know? There's a room and a place for all sorts of advancements, but there also are regressions. And it's unfortunate that that the industry I'm in is the one that tends to to sell many of these to to people. just has candles in his house. I'm guessing he just doesn't before we add number six and seven. Did it make it better?" Going back to you're adding to it, but you're not making it better. I think the the through line here is Yeah. There's nothing else that's going to make it better. So, just leave it. It is perfect. I I know you're a big fan of Porsche. I I don't I It seems like the silhouette has It's very similar. In fact, here in Malibu, I do. Yes. Yes. the Palisades on the right hand side. Why is it still here? But you knew it 97. It sat there for like a year, by the way. Which Yeah. Which model is that exactly? and he's like you could go see a stand-up comedian and 45 minutes in you're like this guy's great. Hour and 15 you go eh. It's like he should have stopped at 45. It's so hard. I guess the reason I bring this up it's so hard for us to stop to stop adding complexity. Yeah. Exactly. that Trent Resner of 9 as a 21-y old man wrote it and he's talking about regret. And Rick's point was like a 21-year-old talking about regret is one thing. A 75year-old man when he can't go back and fix it, it's it's a way deeper cut. But his whole point is like a great vocalist with a guitar sounded great 50 years ago. Yeah. This is why I think people that have run companies for as long as you have are so rare. And it's why if you look at the first few guests, I bet you the a if you took of the average length of time the person has been working in their business, it's probably like 30 years. I'm obsessed with people that do things for a long long period of time. This is where me and you will actually have a disagreement where you're like, I don't work hard. Jason, and I was like, we added up. So yeah, this is where like I would argue that you work harder than most people that have ever lived. You just have spread it across 27 years. So I literally pulled up my phone last night. You did and I was like Yeah. I was like, you're like, but I only work 40 hours a week. I go, "Yeah, 40 hours a week over 27 years, whatever that number is. How many I think it's 54,000 hours or whatever the number is." And my my question back to you is like, how many people have worked on the same thing Yeah. Yeah. I just I like that you spread it across time. You were laying bricks. No. I don't even know if he's still doing anymore, but and he draws he's like they're like the tree that is present and can survive in the most extreme environments on Earth. They've been evolving for whatever time extreme time period. And he was drawing all these parallels between like a great business that could survive using like the the insights he derived from studying these trees, which I think is is very fascinating. Bezos uses the analogy of Amazon as a as an acorn that grew into an oak tree. No, it was uh remember you remember this? you're old enough like the directories were in alphabetical order like remember wasn't that many websites so you could actually named it list them all and he almost did like abcadabra or something like that like abcadabra or something like that and then people thought it was kadaavver and they're like [laughter] so like I've always thought about our business as an oak tree which is like a you know oak trees are very stable They can withstand a lot of storms. They don't grow very fast. They're actually quite slow growing. Some are faster than others, but like in the Midwest where I came from, the like a burr oak is a very slow growing tree, but it lasts a long time, can weather a lot of storms, and I've always found that to be a very appealing kind of tree to be versus like um a cottonwood, which grows really fast, makes a lot of noise, like you can hear cottonwoods when it's windy. They make a lot big mess. Everyone notices them because there's cotton all over the place. and they die in about 75 years or something like that and they come down hard. Like it's just not as interesting to me. Like I don't need to be flashy. I don't need to leave signs all over the place that I've been here. It's going to be nice and quiet, build a great business, keep a solid foundation, add a little bit every year so it just feels more stable and uh and weather storms. And um there's been a lot of over the years like you know in in the tech world there's a lot of um if something comes out it's like it's it's a killer. It's a it's a it's a it's a slack killer. It's a base camp killer. So whatever a killer like when you've been around for a long time you see that played over and over and over. There's a lot of things that are killing supposed supposed to kill something else but very few of them can withstand and and outlive the storms that come. So you can be hot for a while but um the hardest thing is just to to stay around to stick around. So people like how do you compete? Well we just stay around longer than everybody else. Toby Toby's interview with with co in a sense like co saved Shopify in a lot of ways right and people were shopping online more and all that stuff too I'm I'm like I'm a public company CEO and this is what I have to do. He's like, no, there's still I love what he said in that the the conversation where he's like, I believe that I think the way you did it, if you had to do it again, you do it the same way, but there are a hundred different ways to do that same thing. and reading that and thinking about his the prior he prioritized durability in a business and I was like oh so time carries most of the weight you just have to stay you have to survive which goes back to your blubber having you know a margin of safety blubber and small units. Yeah, that's what it is for me. How have you refined it over time? It's been a blast. Thank you so much for having me on. Thanks for doing it. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast, Founders. For almost a decade, I've obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs, searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

センラ#218

こちらこそ。

EN

decades ahead of you. That's beautiful. when when you were talking about selling a company and then maybe your next company in this entrepreneurs's life is not as financially successful as big as well respected. I I I've never heard a great definition of like what like what success means and the best answer I ever heard to like what is success to you actually came from Steve Jobs and it was beautifully simple. It's like did I make something I'm proud of? Yeah. And that's the way I think about it. Like for your podcast, you need x amount of listeners. It's like, no, did I make something I'm proud of? talked about one of the first Rick Rubin tells the story the first time he met Jimmy I. Jimmy's already a legend. and he's 10 years older than Rick, so he's like was well known and Rick plays either with some other music executive and Rick plays him this song he just produced and he said some he said Jimmy said something that changed like his life or the way he thought about things. He goes and Rick's like and Rick's like what do you mean I'm sure you can like you're better at this than I am. You have a lot more experience than I do. You've been doing this a lot longer. Of course you can make something simple. And the point was that you don't know what you don't know. And so he made this beautiful simple thing and then you tend to like think need to add more things to it and make it more complex where Jimmy just again like that's just the way it is when you're with him. He just he'll say one sentence he just gets right to like the heart of the issue. It might [clears throat] have been Rolex. It might have been I mean there's a few could have been like an Omega Speed Master. They just maintained the same design. Porsche 911 similar Oh yeah. basically perfect. Yeah. Has everything I need, nothing I don't. Look at the updated version, whatever. 2010. Yeah. Right. Well, I'm drawn to the first. By the way, I don't think the new one is bad. So, like, it's just that what attracts me is the purity of the first one because that is the purest form of the idea. And I love ideas and insights. Someone had an insight to design a watch that looked like that. And then from there, everyone based their designs off of that initial thing. But there was a time when that was the first thing that looked like that. That gets me going. I just like, for example, like you know, you take a a Rolex Daytona today and you look back at the first one in 1963. To me, the one in 1963, not just cuz it's older, it's better in my opinion aesthetically because it's the purest form of the concept of the idea. Everything else from there has been layered on because they need to sell more and they need to come up with a new version, a new model and this is what happens. Like they wouldn't couldn't still sell that first version. That's like not the way the world works. You have to keep making new stuff, right? Purity and like the the pure idea like the pure form of the thing. Could you use the word essence or no? is part of it. I think maybe you could. Um what's the French word for essence? I want to hear you say it. um uh Assants. I don't know what the hell it is, but it's it's more about the the um the it's to me it's purity. It's like that's the beauty is that this is the initial idea. This is the original concept and this is the first execution of that idea in three dimensions in in a product. actually the the the gym I used to go to had some old concept getting back to the concept two old concept two rowers and I actually really liked looking at the early ones and then looking at the changes over the years and in that case is in that case the changes were more functional like they used better materials that lasted longer and stuff but the idea the fact that this idea of this product that's so good today was so pure back then and still kind of the same thing like just gave me I'm I'm more attached to the brand because of that like they didn't just add stuff to add stuff They added stuff that literally did improve things. Not just to sell new models, but to you could see the material changes. Meanwhile, like a lot of things like watches and stuff, it's just like new dial colors and new stuff just to kind of sell more. Um it's funny because it's a great product based on the original Honeywell design that that Drifus designed. I forget his first name. or whatever. But actually the thermostats don't that's the alarm panel that has it's like a huge iPad screen. Anyway, screens and screens and everything's a touch screen. Everything's a big black glass thing with too much stuff on it cuz you got to fill up the screen. You can't just have a tiny screen. You got to have a big screen. And if you have a big screen, you got to put stuff on it. So, you put stuff on it. Um, a dishwasher couldn't be used the first time without an app to register it. So, like my mom wants to do the dishes, like they don't work. She had to call the house manager guy. He had to come down. He's like, "Why doesn't this work? We plugged it in and oh, there's an app. I got to get an app." Like, what? You're adding and not making it better Yeah. you turn the TV on and the channel that you were on would be on. Like that was good. Like you actually It's amazing. Like you can't do that today. Like that's actually not even a possible thing. Like you turn it on and you're back to some like menu with all the options again. It's like how do we go backwards? I call this the great regression. Thermostats have gotten worse. Nest maybe is an exception. I'll give grant them that. Good product. Really good product. um a big alarm panels, a lot of panels, a lot of thirdparty products with big glass screens, bad touchscreens often bad. In fact, car manufacturers um with the exception of Tesla because Tesla's is outstanding. But everyone else who put a bunch of screens in their cars, they're starting to move back to dials again and buttons again because people are like, "This sucks. Software is hard and a big piece of glass. There's no tactile feedback. I can't do it and I have to look at it. There's no muscle memory cuz I'm not sure I'm confirming what I'm doing." Like these are bad things. So that technology can get worse and then it can slide back and hopefully can get better again and new lessons can be learned. But it was a revelation to me to go into a new home with the state-of-the-art stuff and see how backwards it was. And I'm in technology. I'm not like again I'm not a light. I'm not afraid of this stuff. I get it. But to see how bad it's gotten, like the [clears throat] light switches, like literally what when we rented the place, my my agent who who found it and whatever and did the negotiations and stuff, he's like, "Hey, they want to like do a walk through with you." And I go, "Cool. I'll be there tomorrow." And I thought the walkthrough was going to be just like, "Here's the house." But it was like, "No, here's how you use the lights." You're like, "I have to What? What?" Like the best interface ever was like the switch. It works on off. Beautiful. It's almost like It makes me think of, again, I'm going to tie this back to Rick Rubin since we've been talking about him a lot. He has this concept of a I don't know. I don't these guys are close to them. I ask him, but uh he has this idea of ruthless edit. And so he's like, "Okay, you made 30 songs for your album." He's like, "Pick the five that you absolutely can't live without." Okay. So, now we have a five song album. It's a perfect album. Maybe it needs some more. So, he was like, "But then we decide out of the 25 left you're you you see this like timeless design of the 1963 Daytona and you're like, there's nothing to add to it. do you remember going up to PCH? There was that burnt out. They left. You could tell Exactly. It was a You could just You knew it was a 911. But immediately the other cars next to it burned out. I have no idea what it is. That was just it was like I know exactly what that is. I think about that all the time. I think product you should think about this. Uh Jerry Jerry Seinfeld has this really interesting um concept where he says dosage matters Yeah. To just sit there. When I asked you about um like timeless design, go back to Rick Rubin. What I love about him and that that exchange between him and Jimmy I happened, you know, probably 40 years ago. Rick would say is like somebody playing the piano, just the piano and a piano and a beautiful vocal sounded great 50 years ago, sounds great today. That's right. It'll sound great or 50 years from now. So when you try to revive Johnny Cash's career, this great song called Hurt, which I listen to. It sounds great today. Let's just go back to the essence of what we're actually building. And I think, you know, not many people building products, you just gave the perfect example, but there's no essence there. They're not even using their own products. No, this actually ties into some other advice that Jeff gave us uh way back right when we first we first met him, which was that he told us to focus on the things in our business that don't change. He goes, "There's going to be plenty of things that do change, but make sure you focus on the things that don't change." And the examples he gave us were um said something like, "10 years from now, people are not going to wake up and go, I wish uh Amazon's customer service was worse." They're not going to wake up 10 years from now and go, "I wish it took longer to get a product from Amazon." They're not going to say 10 years from now, I wish Amazon's prices were higher. So these are the core essence elements that he clearly invested in. Things are coming faster than ever. Selection. Another one is like people aren't going to wake up 10 years from now and go, I wish I couldn't get this on Amazon. Like every more selection, faster delivery, great customer service, fair prices, even competing against other people and offering the lower price even if Amazon doesn't sell it. Like these are the things in his business that he knew would never change. and he can still explore a whole bunch of other things because they do a lot of other things but don't lose sight of those basics is something that he really instilled in us and something we've tried to focus on. So that this idea of what is the this is the essence like what is the essence or the purity or the the core fundamental basics that really matter um and don't lose sight of those because it's very easy to lose sight of those because they can become boring like we've done that for a while let's do something else and you can kind of lose sight of that. It's just like I'm obsessed. You said you like old people. People always say I'm obsessed with old people, which is funny, but I'm just not obsessed with old people. Do you remember talking about this last night? I was like, Jason, did the math? for 54,000 hours? I don't know. Tiny tiny amount probably. Yeah. I mean Yeah. I I suppose I mean like again it's it's it's like one day at a time. So it wasn't that wasn't intended. I was just laying bricks. I just keep doing it. I mean and then it just adds up and the past gets bigger and adds up and that's what happens. But yeah, I've always admired things that have stuck around for a long time. We used to have a podcast back in the day called The Distance which was a podcast that we did a few years of businesses that had been around for 25 years or more. And maybe that's not even that long all things considered, but it's quite long for most. That's incredible. And it was awesome. And most of these are family-owned small businesses. They just nailed some things and got them right. And I love businesses like that that have been around for a long time. There's something about I'm not talking about us here, but there's something about um if it's been around that long, it's not a fluke. You can like have something that's hot for a while and it can go it can go out. That's kind of a fluke or like a a trend or a fad or something. But to be around for a long time signals that there's something is repeatedly right about this thing. Right enough to stay in business for a long time. A lot of these businesses are tight. Like you could have a a dry cleaner that their margins thin and maybe it just is enough for them to get by, but they'd rather still be doing that than something else. And so they're in it for a long time. It's not that it's like a great business, but it's a sustainable business. And that to me is a great business. If they can keep doing that, there you go. It's the same insight you had earlier with the leaf. You're like, why don't you look at this leaf? It has evolved forever. Do you know who Mark Spitzagel is? I read his book called The Dow of Capital. And this was probably like seven years ago. He runs this uh this hedge fund. he has an entire chapter in that book on conifer trees I love it. I've often thought of our business as as as an oak tree. I love oak trees. Oak trees are like trees that I love. I don't think about as the acorn so much. That's cool though. Especially a acorn. Amazon. There you go. Whatever. Wonder if he thought about acorn as a company. I remember that I remember reading that like that's not a good association they don't sell kadabas there do they don't they don't it's amazing um the everything store doesn't sell kadabas okay Yeah. The line I have on this that reappears over and over again in these biographies is you just stay in the game long enough to get lucky. There's going to be something that happens year 5 10 15 20 usually an innovation invented by somebody outside your company you can take advantage of uh the example of this like Coca-Cola with refrigeration they didn't invent refrigeration but it drastically expanded their market he needed that difficult time period to then grow and to realize all the things he was doing wrong and this is he well he had that huge spike in stock price, which you talked about, and then the the it going down. But it's when he realized, oh, like I'm cosplaying. there's not one right way to do something. There's probably a hundred at least 100. I want to go back to what you just said, though. Like, you know, something could be hot, it could be a fad. The maximum I have for this is time is the only like time is the best filter. It's the filter the only filter I trust for businesses for ideas for books. I usually read a lot of old books but for it works for people too because like a huge influence of my thinking is like Charlie Mer and his whole thing is like you need to build a seamless web of deserved trust with high quality people. And the only way you know if somebody's high quality is time and in him and Warren's case they knew the same people for decade after decade after decade. I'm rereading the book Snowball. It's like the 700page biography of Warren Buffett right now. And the amount of friends that he accumulates in his 20s, 30s, 40s that are still around when they're in their 70s and 80s is absolutely remarkable. The time is the the for a business time carries most of the weight is is another maximum. I got that from Munger because he when you read Porsche Zmanac, his thing is that you should master there's only a handful of big ideas in all these different disciplines. So you know biology, physics, economics and he's like and if you just master the big ideas he says those few handful of big ideas carry most of the freight Yeah that's a big part of it too. This is a bit of an aside, but it's tied to it. Um, and I think it's important to talk about is pricing. So, with Base Camp, for example, nobody can pay us more than $299 a month. Okay? It doesn't matter how many users you have. So, you could be a big enterprise and $299 a month is the most you can possibly our prices go way way low, but that's the most we allow you to pay us. Now, many of our competitors will like, "Hey, you want to pay us 50 grand a month? You got 2,000 seats? We'll take it." I don't want their money because what I want is a static group of customers. Like if you think about static like an old TV, like the dots, they're all equal sized. You should be able to pick out 10 random customers and lose I don't want to lose customers, but if you could pick out 10 random customers and lose them, I think you have a good business. If you put out a 100 random customers and lose them and be okay, you have a good business. What you don't want are a bunch of outlier companies that you cannot afford to lose. You don't want customers that you cannot afford to lose. And so by equalizing our pricing and not letting anyone pay us more than anybody else, we create a bunch of small units which are individual customers. And if you take one out, it's not like Django where the whole thing is going to fall. Like it doesn't matter in a sense because everyone's essentially equal no matter how big you are. And then we can develop software for the customer base as a whole and not for a handful of customers that pay us a lot more than everybody else. And that's the enterprise game is paying is is getting as many seats as you can and landing these whales. And I just don't find that interesting. I also don't find it durable. Durability is about a lot of small things and if someone wants to chip away at some of those, it doesn't matter because there's a lot more left. That's kind of what we're aiming for with durability. So, one thing that we haven't touched on which I think is really important, we've danced around it a few times, you've mentioned a few times, is that you are all intuition. I want to hear your thoughts on intuition and I want to hear how you refine your intuition. I mean intuition for me is just is is making decisions that you're comfortable with. I mean like and and and not look actually you do want to look around. You want to pay attention to things as many things as you can in a sense but ultimately you have to be willing to make a human decision about something and stick by it and stick behind it. Um I think these these things these decisions come from somewhere where you can't quite define where they're from. Like it's not like there's one thing that tips it over. Intuition to me is like a a collection of a lot of things that you can't quite split apart that lead you to make a decision. And um that's how I'm driven. I I I I go by gut. I go by intuition. Whether it's a pricing or a product decision or a feature or a new product or a name or whatever it is, we don't test things. We don't uh do focus groups. I don't we occasionally AB test for fun, but not like because it matters. Um, and uh, and and that's it. Like I'm not looking at numbers. I I've never seen a spreadsheet that's ever made me do anything. Like I don't want to make a product decision because a spreadsheet told me to. That's just like a thing. And there's a lot of other things that can tell me to do other things. I don't want to value this because it's like a spreadsheet with like numbers on it. Like that's just a thing. and and so I'm very careful not to put too much weight into something that purports to be more valuable than some other feeling I have just because it has numbers on it. Um, now of course I don't want to do stupid things. I'm not going to like throw $50 million at a a Super Bowl ad. Like I'm not going to do that. Um, so like your intuition has limits too, but everything we do is based on just kind of what we want to do, what we feel. I want to feel into these decisions and go I feel good about this. No matter what happens, let's do it anyway. You just do things. You make decisions. I mean, to me, like it's all about time under the curve in terms of making decisions or area under the curve, sorry, I think is the is the actual correct way to way to phrase that. Um, so the more decisions you make, um, the more time you have, the more intuition you're refining, but you don't like actively refine it. It's not like you're you don't practice intuition, you just make decisions. And the more you make, the more you make, the more it sharpens everything up. It's like um it takes the takes the edge off I think eventually as you make more and more and more and you're tumbling these things around essentially you end up with like a nice smooth orb and it feels really good to have that in your hand and uh and uh it's just it feels right and that's kind of where you want to get to. So you want to have this place where when you make a decision you're like this feels like the right decision. I'm not afraid of this decision. I'm excited about this decision. It could go wrong and I'd be okay with that too. Like I just know that this is the decision I want to make right now and I'm lucky to be in this position where I can make it. No one can tell me I can't. Like that's another part of intuition because you can have intuition that keeps hitting a ceiling and someone else says no and then you don't get to use it. So intuition has to be used I think to really be enjoyed and uh that requires again back to independence back to uh optionality as well. Jason, one of the coolest things about my job is that I could have somebody like you that I've read and has shaped my thinking over a decade and a half. We become friends. you get to hang out and then you also get to, you know, come on the show and then share all the things I love about you for everybody else. I really appreciate the time today, man. This is … awesome. Yeah, you bet.

FAQ

A. 英語原文・自動字幕について

### なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは?

このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。

- 動画: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdDCtMA1gSw - 公式: https://www.davidsenra.com - ゲスト: Jason Fried(37signals / Basecamp / HEY)

### 自動字幕の精度は? どこが壊れやすい?

2人の比較的クリアなインタビューですが、固有名詞・製品名・ハンドル・早口・罵倒マスクで崩れます。

| 字幕に出やすい崩れ | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | 37 Signals / Drip signals | 37signals | | Base camp | Basecamp | | Hey / hay | HEY(メールサービス) | | Toby / Toby Luke | Tobi Lütke(Shopify) | | Fizzy | Fizzy(37signals の製品) | | Concept 2 / concept two | Concept2 ローイングマシン | | Golopagus / Galopicos | Galápagos(ガラパゴス) | | Navajo rugs | Navajo(ナビホ)ラグ | | Dave Seagull / high-five award | 設計コミュニティの賞・人物(字幕ベース) | | Olivia's | シカゴ近辺の食料品店(本人談) | | Vinny's | Chicago Avenue のサンドウィッチ店(本人談・記憶ベース) | | Brother ではないが関連 | DHH回のプリンタ比喩とは別回 | | Apploven / axon / Deal | スポンサー名の崩れ(本編では広告省略) | | RSCUs | RSUs(制限付き株式ユニット) | | Django(ジェンガの比喩) | 価格・大口顧客の話で「ジェンガのように崩れない」 | | Mark Spitzagel | Mark Spitznagel(『The Dao of Capital』) | | Joe Columbo / Colbo | Trader Joe's 創業者 Joe Coulombe | | Dreyfus / Nest thermostat | Henry Dreyfuss 系の丸型サーモデザイン言及 | | 200 emails / 62 people | 口頭の数字。厳密な社内統計ではない |

日本語本文では多くを修正済み。英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、引用の一次ソースは動画を優先してください。

### 日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している?

していません。 日本語は読みやすさのため整え、広告ブロックは省略。英語は字幕切れ目が細かい。話者を手がかりに話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。

### 上部トグルは何のため?

- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け(英語は約9.5px) - 英語を少し大きく … 対照精読用(約11px)

デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」。

B. 人物・会社・固有名詞

### Jason Fried / 37signals / Basecamp / HEY / Fizzy

Jason Fried。David Heinemeier Hansson(DHH)と 37signals を共同運営。代表プロダクトにプロジェクト管理の Basecamp、メールの HEY、会話中の Fizzy など。本編の軸は「唯一の競合はコスト」「薄い封筒・厚い手紙」「十分であること」「オプション性」。

### David(パートナー)

会話中の David は主に David Heinemeier Hansson(DHH)。CTO/共同経営者。クラウド離脱の記事や利益・コストの話題で言及。

### Jeff Bezos

37signals の初期投資家(通常VCではない条件)として語られることがある。本編ではカスタマーサポート義務、「変わらないものに焦点」、情熱は向こうから来る、などの助言・逸話。

### Tobi Lütke(Shopify)

予測不能な返答・非相関な見解の話。コロナ期・公開企業CEOの自己認識など、センラ側の他エピソードとの接続。

### Patrick O'Shaughnessy

「良い仕事の報酬は、もっと仕事をすること」に近い言い回しで引用。Colossus / Positive Sum 周り。

### John Mackey

Whole Foods 創業者。シリアル起業・友人の立ち上げ好き、サイケデリックの話題で接続。

### Rick Rubin / 『The Creative Act』

創造行為・洞察・日記の1エントリ・容赦ない編集。Jimmy Iovine との「あんなにシンプルなものが…」逸話。Johnny Cash『Hurt』。

### Jimmy Iovine

「バックミラーはない」。Rick との初対面エピソード。同じ椅子に座った、とセンラ。

### Christopher Nolan

アナログ志向・スマホなし・脚本の物理手渡し、というセンラ側のまとめ(伝記・公開情報ベースの要約を含む)。

### Concept2

ローイングマシン。電池駆動のシンプルな表示、触覚ボタン、耐久性——「完璧に近いプロダクト」の例として長く語られる。

### UPS / Jim Casey

100年以上前の例として、幹部のイエスマン化を避け現場のドライバーと直接話す話。

### Trader Joe's / Joe Coulombe

恐れから売却し、後年後悔を記した自伝の話。字幕の氏名は崩れやすい。正確な綴りは Joe Coulombe

### The Distance

37signals 側が過去にやっていた、25年以上続く事業を扱うポッドキャスト(本人談)。

### Christopher Alexander

建築家。村の建物に「説明できない品質/ぴったり合う品質」がある、という話の参照(本人も「かもしれない」と留保)。

C. 考え方案・用語

### Your only competition is your costs(唯一の競合はコスト)

市場の他社ではなく、毎年「使うより多く稼ぐ」ことだけが本当の対戦相手。コントロールできるのはコストと自社の売値。

### 封筒と手紙(envelope / letter)

- 封筒 … 事業・ブランド・車両・殻 - 手紙 … プロダクトそのもの

薄い封筒+厚い手紙。ビジネスを金融商品化する「起業家の演技」への反発とセット。

### 軌道(orbit)vs ホッケースティック

離陸して重力を振り切ったあと、無限成長ではなく快適な軌道で維持する。成長のための成長への「So what?」。

### So what? / 反・数字最適化

価格・A/B・テーブルに残る金への無関心。一方でプロダクトを良くする最適化は好き。文脈依存の一貫性。

### 再雇用の質問

1年後: 今知っていることを知ったうえで、もう一度雇うか? 職位にも同じ(もう一度作るか?)。

### ソフトは坂を下る(software slides downhill)

物理的制約がないため膨らみ悪化する。新版は根本で前より単純に、が課題。

### blubber(脂肪・安全余裕)

タイトすぎないマージンと蓄え。ミスや不況(ドットコム、2008、コロナ)に耐える。骨まで削らない。

### 小さな単位 / アンチフラジャイル

日・小さな決断・均質な顧客。巨大な一決断を避け、捨てられる単位で積む。

### 6週間 / リス

だいたい6週間先までの方向。日々はコース修正。近いことほどわかる。

### ガラパゴス的プロダクト

分野内コピーを追わず、島のように独自進化。インスピレーションはソフト外(家具・自然・Concept2)。

### ナビホのラグ

「ミス」ではなく瞬間の記録。デモや真正性で失敗を残す美学と接続。

### ツールメーカー / レバー

テック業界人ではなく、ソフトウェアという素材の道具職人。進捗を生むレバー。

### 大退行(great regression)

スマート家電・タッチだらけのサーモ・ブートするTV・アプリ必須の食洗機。「足しているが良くしていない」。

### オプション性 / 独立

IPO・VC・PE・辞める——全部「できるがやらない」。黒字=誰にも命じられない。VCは出口を一択にしがち。

### Basecamp 価格上限(会話上 $299/月)

大口に多く払わせない。失えないクジラを作らず、顧客を均質な小さな単位に。数字は口頭ベースで、現行価格表は公式を確認。

### 利益の10%を勤続で分配

役割・給与ではなく longevity。現金。オプション文化への対比。口頭の制度説明。

### 成功の定義

Jobs 的「誇れるものを作ったか」/フリード的「翌日もう一度やりたいか」/再雇用の問いと同型。

### ネガティブ・ビジュアライゼーション

SaaSが死んでも「良いランだった」と言えるか。二度目の会社は作らない前提。

### 同じ体験は二度ない(マッシュルームの曲)

一度の魔法を再現できない。子供の年齢も同じ。今を味わう。

D. エピソードの位置づけ・読み方

### この回の一本線は?

自分のためのプロダクト → コストが唯一の競合 → 小さなチームと再雇用の問い → 封筒/手紙と軌道 → So what? と反最適化 → 顧客に近い薄い会社 → 十分・日々・小さな単位 → ガラパゴスと真正性 → ツールと物理世界 → 自分が誰か/直感/blubber → 振り返らない・日記の1エントリ → オプション性とタイムレス → 価格の均質と直感の研磨。

### DHH回との関係

同じ37signalsのもう一人。DHH回は less software・Omarchy・コントロールを売らない、が厚い。本回は Jason 視点のコスト・封筒・十分・オプション性・直感が厚い。併読すると会社像が立体になる。

### 学習用の使い方のおすすめ

1. まず日本語だけ通読(トグルで英語OFF) 2. 気になったブロックだけ英語をONにして語彙を拾う 3. FAQの固有名詞表で名前を固定する 4. 引用するなら動画の該当箇所を優先(ASRは一次ソースにしない)

### 省略した広告

Ramp(コスト管理)、HubSpot(データ統合)、Function(血液検査・健康)などのスポンサー読み上げは本文から外しています。