David Senra · JA + tiny EN

まだ始まったばかり——デル・テクノロジーズのマイケル・デル

Michael Dell, Dell Technologies | David Senra

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラデル
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

収録前に話していたところから入りたい。君はずっと取り憑かれている、と言っていた。Dell を41年走らせていて、でも本当の執念は11、12歳くらいからある。だから実質50年くらい——Dell 以前にも「Dell 以前の Dell」があった、という話だ。中学校の話を誰かがしてくれた、とも言ってた。

EN

I want to jump right into what we were talking about before we started recording that. You said somebody was you've been obsessed. You've been running Dell for 41 years. You've been obsessed really since you were like 11 or 12. So you've been running it for 50 years cuz you were it was there was a Dell before a Dell, right? But you were saying somebody was telling you the story about you in middle school. When I was in uh junior high school in the in the summers in Houston, uh there were classes at Rice University for for young kids, okay? And so you could go to Rice University, take these classes, and my my mom, you know, kind of signed me up and it was great. you know, they had these college professors and they were teaching these classes. And uh the the way I would get to Rice University is I would take the bus from from from our house, right? And it'll like take you downtown

デル#2

ヒューストンの中学の頃、夏にライス大学で子どものためのクラスがあった。母が申し込んでくれて、大学の先生が教えてくれる。すごくよかった。ライスに行くには家からバスに乗った。で、好奇心が勝って、「このバスにそのまま乗っていたら、高いビルがあるダウンタウンまで行くんじゃないか」と思って乗ったままにした。

本当に高いビルがあるところに着いた。11、12歳でうろつきながら、証券取引所とティッカーが動いているのを見た。「うわ、かっこいい」。そこから株式市場を学び始めた。親がいつも金融市場の話をしていたのもあって、すごく早い時期に興味が火がついた。覚えていた話だ。

EN

and and uh I was I was curious. So I was I was like, "Okay, if I just stay on the bus, takes me all the way downtown to where the really tall buildings are." So So I go down there, it's like really tall buildings. I'm like roaming around. I'm like 11 or 12 years old and I see like they've got like the stock exchange there and all these tickers going. I'm like, "Wow, that's pretty cool." So, I just started started learning about the stock market. So anyway, it's just something I remembered and and you know, my my parents were always talking about financial markets and uh it just sparked sort of this this uh interest really really ear early in in life. There's a great line I've seen um from both Ken Griffin and Larry Ellison describing you. They're like just this guy was manufacturing computers in America at a time when there was like thousands of other people doing the exact very similar thing and he was the only one that survived. And the reason I just thought about that is because I was watching this um this talk that Ken gave I think at Yale and he says something he's like for reasons I can't explain. I don't know why. I've just been obsessed with the stock market, with business since I was in the third grade, and you know, 60 years later, how old it is, like I that obsession has not dulled. We were just in your office and you were showing me one of your new unreleased uh products that we can't film or photograph. But you were like I was like this is this is like a kid on Christmas. Like you're still

センラ#3

ケン・グリフィンとラリー・エリソンが君を評した言葉がある。当時アメリカでコンピュータを組み立てていた人は何千人もいたのに、生き残ったのはこの人だけだ、と。ケンがイェールかどこかで話していたのを見ていて、「なぜか説明できない。小学三年の頃から株式とビジネスに取り憑かれていて、60年近く経ってもその執念は鈍っていない」と言っていた。

さっきオフィスで、まだ出していない新製品を見せてもらった。撮影も写真もダメだと言われた。でもクリスマスの子供みたいだった。まだその熱量が落ちていない。

EN

super cool product. Yeah, I'm I'm very excited.

デル#4

すごくクールな製品だよ。すごく興奮している。

EN

I told you I'll buy one. I think it was cool, too. I'm going to buy one as soon as it comes out. But I just love this enthusiasm that is just not dulling. What do you think? I was just with your son, Zach, last night and I was we were talking a lot about his business. It's absolutely ripping. He's super intense and like he's just in it right now, right?

センラ#5

出たら買うよ。僕もクールだと思った。息子のザックと昨夜話していて、彼のビジネスがめちゃくちゃ走っている話が95%だった。すごく強度が高い。最後に「父に聞いておくべきことがある」と、アウトラインを僕より上手に出してきた。いちばん面白いのは「動機」だと言われた。何が君を動かしているのか。

EN

And then that was like 95% of our conversation. Then he's like, "All right, I have some things that you should talk to my dad about." And then I he was so good. I was like, "Shit, he just did the outline better than me." So one of the things uh he's like, "You need to get on record what motivates him." He's like, "It's one of the most fascinating things." He's like, "Just ask him what motivates him." So, what motivates you?

デル#6

全部、楽しくて面白いし、学びたい。大きなパズルを解いて理解したい、みたいなものだ。テクノロジーが世界に与える影響を考えると、その真ん中にいて、理解して、前に進める手伝いをするより興奮できることが他にあるか? 無限ゲームだ。終わらない。勝つのは好きで、負けるのは嫌い。こういう事業の真ん中にいて、展開が繰り広げられるのを見る——いちばん興奮することだ。

EN

You know, it's all just like fun and interesting and I want to learn. And it's like uh it's like a big puzzle to solve and understand. And you think about the impact that technology has on the world. What could be more exciting than to be in the middle of that and and to figure it out and to, you know, help help advance it? And it's an infinite game, right? It never never ends. Love love to win. Hate to lose. And um yeah, it's just it's just like the most exciting thing you you could do to be in the middle of a business like this. and to see it all unfold and play out.

センラ#7

ザックも「パズルに中毒している」と言っていた。そういう見方?

EN

Yeah, he that's one of the things he's like he's addicted to puzzles. So that's the way you look at it.

デル#8

好奇心でパズルを解く、理解する、解き明かす。それがいつもやりたいこと。問いを解けないと感じたら満たされない。理解したい、という燃えるような欲求がある。パズルと数学はずっと大事だった。

EN

Yeah. I mean it's it's it's like it's like the curiosity solving a puzzle, understanding things and figuring it out. Yeah. That's that that's uh you always want to do that. I mean, I I I would feel unfulfilled if I couldn't figure out a puzzle, a question. So, yeah, there's like a burning desire to understand things

センラ#9

自分について、それをいつ気づいた?

EN

and to and to figure them out. Puzzles and and math have always been uh important.

デル#10

気づいたことはない。いま聞かれたから言っただけで、ただやっていただけ。理解したかった。物理的なものなら分解する。分解せずにどうやって理解するのか。親はけっこうフラストレーションだった。家のものを分解するから。ときどき組み立て直した。ときどきまだ動いた。

EN

When did you realize that about yourself?

センラ#11

本にある有名な話だ。Apple II を貯金して買って家に持って帰ると、親は「プラグを挿して遊ぶ」と思っている。でもすぐに分解した。「どう動くのか理解したかった」。

EN

I never really realized it. I You just asked me about it. Uh I it's just just it just what I did. I just wanted to understand things.

デル#12

この機械はすごいことをする。でもどう動くのか。中に何があるのか。どう組み合わさっているのか。なぜこれであってあれじゃないのか。本質まで降りていく。

EN

Mhm.

センラ#13

本を読んでいて思った。ティーンエイジャーになる前——Dell 公式スタート前——に IBM の機械を分解している。当時 IBM は世界でいちばん価値のある会社で、時価総額1000億ドルに到達した最初の会社だった。分解して「部品だ。世界最大の会社の製品なのに、他社の部品の寄せ集めだ」と気づく。行間を読むと、「同じことができる。彼らにできて自分にできないことがあるのか」という発想だ。そう思った?

EN

And and you know when I was dealing with with uh physical things, the way I would understand them is to take them apart. It's like how can you understand something if you don't take it apart? Like and um my parents would get pretty frustrated, you know, taking apart things in the house.

デル#14

絶対にそう思った。開けたら中に何がある? チップ、配線、電源、ディスクドライブ——全部コンポーネント。どこから来るのか、誰が作っているのか、中はどうなっているのか。玉ねぎの皮をむくように理解していく。

最初の IBM PC も、電源を入れる前に分解したんじゃないか。当時は ASIC(特定用途向け集積回路)のような「中身が設計者以外わからない巨大チップ」がなく、市販のチップばかりだった。論理の流れと、各チップの役割がわかる。IBM PC の中のチップはどれも IBM 製じゃない。ディスクドライブも電源も IBM 製じゃない。

経済にも興味があった。このチップはいくらか、あれはいくらか。足し合わせて売価と比べる。「うわ、とんでもないマージンを乗せている」。

EN

Sometimes I'd put them together. Sometimes they would still work. Um, but it's just the desire. It's to understand things to, you know, the curiosity.

センラ#15

ティーンエイジャーが部品原価を突き止めて売価と比較する——すごい洞察だ。イーロンがロケットでやった話に似ている。ロシアが売ってくれない。飛行機で帰って「ロケットは何でできている? 部品リストは? 原価は?」と問い続ける。君も玉ねぎをむき続けた。

EN

Yeah. That's one of your character traits. You have a great story in the book where I think you save up for the Apple 2. It was a computer and it was, you know, relatively expensive, especially I think you were like 12 or something at the time and then you bring it home and your parents like, "Oh, he's, you know, he's going to plug it in and play with it." It's like, "No, I immediately took took it apart. I needed to understand how it worked."

デル#16

ディストリビューターに聞けば、「このチップ、100個ならこの値段」と教えてくれる。中の全チップの原価を地図にできた。

---

EN

Well, it's like this machine. It's like it does really cool stuff, but how does it work? It's like what's inside it and and how do all those things work and how do they fit together and why did they put these things versus those things and you know sort of getting down to the essence of it. I had a thought when I was reading your book, you know, time you're you're taking part in IBM, you know, this is I'm pretty sure before you you're a teenager, so this is before you start Dell officially, but it's you know, and I didn't know this about IBM. I had to go back and look it up. It's like the most valuable company in the world at the time. It was the first company to ever hit a hundred billion dollar market cap, which also blew my mind. But you take it apart and you're like, "Oh, wait. It's just component. This is the biggest company in the world and this is their product." And if you take it apart, it's just made of components from other companies. And it's just like it's implied, or at least this is what I was reading through the lines when reading your book. It's like, well, I can do the same thing. like what are they doing here that I couldn't do? Did you have that thought?

センラ#17

伝記を読んでいて何度も感じるのは、創業者はただ質問を重ね続ける、という常識だ。玉ねぎの皮をむく。答えが出たら次の問い、また次の問い。人間の性質としては最初の問いで止まりがちだけど、君には子供の頃から無限の好奇心がある。いまのオフィスを見てもまだある。ロケット科学じゃない。問い続けて、情報を集めて、答えを考える。

EN

Yeah, absolutely. I mean, so it's back to when you open the thing up,

デル#18

物事をすごく深いレベルで理解したい。それがずっと自分のやり方だ。

EN

you look inside, what's there? Well, there's chips, right?

センラ#19

人の人生を読むとき、僕が興味があるのは「その人が誰で、なぜそれをやっているか」だ。チャーリー・マンガーの天才的な一行——アイデアを、それを生んだ人格に結びつける方がはるかに効く。だから幼少期や関心を読む。

本でいちばん好きな場面のひとつが、親が君に詰め寄るところだ。テキサス大学の寮で Dell を始めて、親は取り乱している——その後40年を考えると笑えるくらいだ。「マイケル、医者の道を行くはずだろう」。お母さんは泣いていた。

EN

Yeah.

デル#20

とても感情的だった。

EN

And there's wires and there's

センラ#21

本では「折れた(I caved)」と書いてある。子供の頃から強い性格なのに珍しい。次のページで、10日間コンピュータに触れずコールドターキーで授業のノートを取ろうとして、無理だとわかる。コンピュータで働くのはスリリングだと思っていた。1000ドルで退学して、世界最大の会社に挑む。

EN

power supplies and disc drives and all these components. It's like, well, where do those things come from? Who makes those? What's inside those? How do they make those? And so you sort of peel the onion, you know, and you understand all the different elements. And you know, when I uh originally got the first IBM PC, you know, yeah, probably took it apart before I turned the thing on, you know, just to just to see what's what's inside. And one of the really cool things back then was that you didn't have these uh sort of application specific integrated circuits. They call them AS6, right? Or these big sort of uh chips that nobody really knows what's inside except the designers.

デル#22

親が圧力をかけてきたからこそ、本当に向き合って決めた。「これは趣味やサイドプロジェクトじゃない。やらなければならない」と。

EN

All the chips were offthe-shelf chips. So you could see you could sort of uh understand what the the the logic flow

センラ#23

その年齢でも全部を飲み込むほどだった? オフィスで寝ていた話もある。Dell を始めたとき何時間働いたと聞かれたら「全部」と答えた、という話が好きだ。

EN

and what each chip was supposed to do inside the circuit and inside the IBM PC none of the chips were made by IBM right and and and uh none of the disc drives were made by IBM the power supply wasn't made by IBM and and so uh you know I was also interested in the economics of it. It's like, well, what does this chip cost? What does that chip cost? And you sort of add it all up and then you compare it to the cost that they're selling the thing for and you go, wow, this is they're really charging an incredible markup for for this.

デル#24

他に何もしていなかった。自分にとって大事なことは他になかった。完全に飲み込まれていて、超エキサイティングで、他に何もしていなかった。

EN

That's an incredible insight to have as a teenager, though. It's like figure out what the like actual cost of the components are, then go look up, you know, it sounds like what Elon did with rockets. This is like the the Russians won't sell it to me. I'm on the flight back. these famous stories in all the books. He's just like, "Well, what is a rocket made of?"

センラ#25

それ以前から、一度に一つのことに集中するタイプだった?

EN

Like, "Okay, well, there there's a list of components. How much those components cost?" What you just said is like you just kept asking questions like, "Oh, I'm going to take it apart." It's like, "Okay, well, this is all the components. This is what it is. This is like where you get them from. This is the look, the company names right here. I can just call them up and find out how much this is." Well, you could go to the distributors and you'd say, you know, "Okay, how much does this chip cost?" And they'd say, "Well, it's this price for a hundred of them."

デル#26

個々のテーマにかなり取り憑かれて、深く入っていく。広く浅く興味があるというより、興奮したこと・興味を持ったことには超深い。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#27

いまもそう?

EN

Right. Uh, and you could you could literally map out the cost of every chip inside the thing. There is a book Ken Griffin, the founder of Citadel, recommends reading called Hardball. The subtitle of that book is, "Are you playing to play or are you playing to win?" It is a book about extreme winners and some of the best operators in business. There is a line in that book that says, "If you have not examined your costs in detail, it is very likely that there exists lurking somewhere in your cost structure a major opportunity to improve your profits, weaken your competitors, and expand your influence. The first move is to drive down your cost faster than your competitors can and use the cost savings to upset their strategies." That sounds like the author was describing Dell. In his autobiography, Michael Dell says that one way that he was able to outco compete his better funded competitor Compact was with a structural cost advantage. Compact's operating costs were 36% of revenue compared to Dell's 18% of revenue. More than 40 years later, Dell is thriving, and Compact no longer exists. The best operators in business have this in common. They know their business from A to Z and their cost down to the penny. Ramp makes doing this effortless. RAMP gives your business easy to use corporate cards for your entire team, automated expense reporting, and cost control, all on a single platform. RAMP's corporate cards are fully programmable. You can set limits so the spending of your team never gets out of hand. Most companies only find out about excessive spending after the fact. With RAMP, you can stop it before it happens. Matt Pollson, who listens to this podcast and who's a founder of Marketbe, recently switched to RAMP, and this is what he said about it. Ramp is the best. The amount of money you will save from unwanted renewals and employees who think company credit card equals buy whatever you want will far exceed the best credit card rewards program. Matt is talking about the importance of cost control. RAMP helps you make this an obsession. Almost all of the top founders and CEOs I know are running their company on RAM. Go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business play to win today. That is ramp.com. something I I don't even know if I I've ever like verbalized before, but it's in all these biographies that I read. What I feel is just like there's just like a lot of common sense where they just the founder tends to just keep asking more questions and just like going to like an you just said I think peeling an onion it's like yeah just like okay I got that answer what's the next one and then what's the next one and there's something in human nature where we just like we stop at the first question but you have this like infinite curiosity that was very obvious like from ch from childhood and I think based on what we were just talking about your office is obviously still present but yeah it's just very fascinating like it's not rocket science just like keep asking questions and collecting information and thinking about the answers you're getting.

デル#28

そうだね。

EN

Hey, you want to understand things at a very deep level

センラ#29

ザックは「朝5時に電話してきて、この製品やこの買収をやろうと言う。止められない。何が止められる? 『殺すしかない』」と言っていた。本を書こうと決めたのはなぜ?

EN

it and and so that's always been a thing for me.

デル#30

非公開化、EMC と VMware の買収——たくさん通ってきた。記録に残したかった。COVID のあいだに時間があって書き始めて、起きたことをまとめる論理的な場所だと思った。いちばんの理由は社内のチームのためだ。ビジネスをどう考え、どこから来たかを理解してほしい。大きくなると全員に直接ストーリーを語れなくなる。うまくいったこと・いかなかったこと、良い面も悪い面も含めて包み込んで共有する機会だ。他の人の物語から自分が恩恵を受けたから、いいアイデアだと思った。

EN

Yeah. I think that's what I'm very interested in. It's like if you read the life story of somebody like I'm very interested in understanding who the person is and like why they're doing what they're doing. And this is the the the genius line from Charlie Mer. It's like, well, if you just way more effective to tie the ideas to the personality that developed them and the way you tie it to the personality developed them, it's like you read about their life story. You read about their childhood. You read about what their interests were. I love the part in your book, I was rereading yesterday where your parents confront you. Okay. You started Dell in your dorm University of Texas and they're just distraught, which is really funny given what's occurred over the next four decades. Like, what are you doing, Michael? you're supposed to be you're supposed to be, you know, on this path to be a doctor.

センラ#31

将来の起業家への贈り物だと思う。会社が大きくなったとき、意思決定と制約と経緯を伝える単一のメディア——本でも社内ポッドキャストでも——が必要だ。Spotify にはプロダクト史のシリーズがある。グスタフが作ったもので、当初は社内向け8部構成だった。アパートで始まった1年目、クローゼットのサーバ、初期に重要だったがもういない人たち。いまは公開されて誰でも聴ける。Dell に入る人にも、8本の1時間エピソードで「なぜこの決断か、当時の制約は何か」が伝わるといい。

EN

And I think your mom's crying. You're you know,

デル#32

まさにそう。いまこの部屋のすぐ下で、中小企業向けセールスの新人研修がある。どうやってここまで来たか、何が正しく何が間違ったか、文化・価値観・信念を深く理解して、自分の貢献で積み上げてほしい。

EN

she was very emotional.

センラ#33

コンテキストを揃える。公開する追加の利点もある。人間はストーリーを買い、お金はストーリーの関数として流れる。40時間かけてその人の会社の物語を読むと、知らなかった製品まで買いたくなる。

ジェームズ・ダイソンの自伝をまた読み返した。400冊のなかでいちばん勧める本のひとつで、90%が苦闘だ。14年間失敗し続けるラバ。5127のプロトタイプ。でも彼はストーリーテリングの力をわかっていた。小売店に入ると掃除機が6台並ぶ。デザインで目を引くが、さらに200語くらいの物語をハンドルに付けた。「誰が、なぜ、どう違うか」が伝わると売上が上がる。すごく効く営業ツールだった。

Founders で君の回をやったあと、メッセージが何千も来た。いちばん多かったのは「Dell というブランド名は知っていた。でも41年の物語と、何度も変貌してきた狂気を知らなかった。出してくれてよかった」だ。

EN

And so you you were like, "Okay." In the book, you said, "I caved." Okay. Which is very unusual cuz you have super strong personality from from a young kid.

デル#34

全部すごく楽しくて、いまも楽しい。事業と機会を考えると、まだ始まったばかりだと感じる。全部楽しい。

EN

But then the very next page I can see in my mind right now I I cold turkey. Didn't even look at a computer for 10 days. I tried to take notes in classes. And then I realized like no, like it was like you were compelled. Like I thought working in computers was going to be thrilling. I'm going to drop out with $1,000 and I'm going to take on the biggest company in the world. I think the fact that they they uh put all that pressure on me is the thing that caused me to really reflect on it and decide that

センラ#35

先人を学んで前に渡したい、と。特に学んだ人、影響を受けた人は?

EN

no, this is more than a little hobby or a side thing. this is just like I have to go do this.

デル#36

子供の頃、起業家の話を読んでいた。チャールズ・シュワブ、フレッド・スミス、サム・ウォルトン、初期の通信の先駆者、1970年代にまさにやっていた人たち。ヒューストンはブームタウンで、新しい会社が生まれ、親がそういう話をしていた。どうやって、なぜ、何が起きたのか知りたかった。自分は事業を始める以外を想像したことがなかった。その考えはとても早い時期から意識の中にあった。

EN

Do you feel it was all consuming even at that age? Cuz you're at the time you're like sleeping in the office when when you do start like you start I know we talked about this last time it's hilarious where somebody asked you was like well when you start Dell like how many hours did you work and you're like all of them.

センラ#37

ジェフ・ベゾスの「情熱は自分が選ぶのではなく、情熱が自分を選ぶ」がある。余白に「彼は強制されている。選択の余地がない」と何度も書いた。特に一人に絞って憧れ・模倣した人は?

EN

Yeah. I mean I I wasn't doing anything else. I mean, there wasn't really anything else that was important to me and so yeah, it was it was totally all consuming and uh super exciting and wasn't doing anything else. Yeah.

デル#38

成功した人からも失敗した人からも学べる。できるだけ多くの起業家を理解しようとした。どう苦闘し、何が効き、何が効かなかったか。それがいつも魅力的な物語だった。

EN

Were you more of like before that somebody that just focused on one task at a time?

センラ#39

15歳のとき、あるカンファレンスでスティーブ・ジョブズの近くにいた。ジョブズは当時25歳くらい。20代でコンピュータ会社を作っている若い人を見たとき、モデルになった? どう受け取った?

EN

I I would get pretty obsessed with, you know, individual topics and sort of go go deep on them. Mhm.

デル#40

マイクロプロセッサ時代のコンピュータ産業の初期、Apple は先頭企業で、スティーブは伝説的な人物だった。Apple のユーザーグループ——ギークが集まって改造や自作ソフトを見せ合い学ぶ——にいて、スティーブが講演に来た。信じられない比喩を使い、Apple がやっていることを見て「すごい」と思った。同じ頃ビル・ゲイツの話も聞こえ始めて、二人とも自分より10歳くらい上だった。「彼らがクールなことをやった。自分にもチャンスがあるかも」と思った。

EN

Um, so yeah, I wouldn't consider myself, you know, generally interested in a bunch of things. I was like, super deep on certain things that excited me or interested me.

センラ#41

夕食で言われたことが頭の中で鳴り続けて眠れなかった。明示的な助言というより観察だったと思う。40年以上見てきた無数の会社と起業家について、「ほとんどの創業者は競合に潰されたのではなく、自分で自分を壊した」と言った。意図せず怖かった。もう少し話して。

EN

Is that still the case today or is it just basically

デル#42

途中で致命的なミスをして、結局会社が続かなかった、と論じることはできる。でも自分の行いだ。正しい選択をし続けて、生き延び、最終的に繁栄しないといけない。

EN

place to be? Yeah. Yeah.

センラ#43

ミスの原因は? 賢い・才能ある・競争心のある人たちだ。マンガーは「知的な人を壊すのはレディ・酒・レバレッジの三つ」と言う。自分を壊す共通の原因を見たことは?

EN

Yeah. Zach told me he's like he'll call me at like 5:00 a.m. and he was like, I have an idea like we should do this product or this acquisition or whatever. He's just like he just can't help himself. And I asked him, I go, "Uh, what would get him to stop?" He's like, "You have to kill him." What made you decide to write the book?

デル#44

チャーリーはその三つについて正しい。僕らはそれから距離を取る。あとは理解と好奇心に戻る。うまくいっている/いない理由を知らなければならない。超競争的な場の真ん中にいて何が起きているか完全に理解していないとミスする。もういない競合を見ると、過剰拡大、設計ミス、競争環境の理解不足——失敗の仕方はたくさんある。

EN

You know, we we had we had gone through a whole lot

センラ#45

本にあるアダム・オズボーンの例がいい。Osborne 1 は比較的成功していた。Osborne 2 を「もっと新しく改善された」と大々的に発表した。でも出荷が間に合わなかった。市場に何を伝えている?

EN

uh with the going private and buying EMC and VMware and there just been so much that happened. I wanted to kind of document it and it was during co I had some time and start started writing the stuff down and it felt like a logical place to uh sort of capture everything that that had happened. And you know, one of the main reasons I wrote it was for our team inside the company because I you know want them to understand uh you know how we think about the business and where it came from and you know as a as a business grows larger it's harder to be able to tell the stories directly w with w with with with everyone. And so it's just a great opportunity to encapsulate all that and uh share, you know, what happened really, the the good and the bad, the things that worked well, things that didn't work well. And um you know, I certainly benefited from reading the stories or hearing the stories of other people and thought it'd be a good idea. I said this on the the episode I made about it's like a great gift to like future generations of um entrepreneurs. I actually think that idea of like having uh like a singular piece of media whether it's a book there's another idea for you for podcast uh for people as the company grows to understand like this is the decisions that were made this is why it was this is what we've gone through. Uh Spotify has this. Originally they they did Gustaf is the head of product at Spotify and he's actually one that made this. And originally um I talked to them about this. They were just going to do it was like an eight-part series. Uh it was going to be a private podcast inside the company which tells the history of Spotify. So if you come in now, you know, 20 years into its existence, it's like, well, what were we what was like year one in an apartment? You know, we got a server in a closet. And so what they did is they did this beautiful like narrative and uh they would also include the people that were important at the in the early days like you know some people don't last in the company but they were really important first two three four years

デル#46

オズボーン効果。いまはあまり語られないが、当時は本物だった。現行より良い新製品を発表すると、現行が売れなくなり、会社が終わる。やりたくない。だから、誰もやったことのないミスをしろ。小さく増分でやれ。見つけたらすぐ直せ。ミスはしたい。小さくして、反復して、速く直したい。

新しい領域・技術・ビジネスモデルで事業を作るとき、プレイブックはない。「こうやれ」と書いてある本もない。隣接業界から人を雇ってやらせると、前にやっていたことをやるだけになる。だから創造性が要る。実験で答えに直感的に近づく。「こう理論がある、試す。効いたら2倍、10倍、100倍。効かなければ止めて別の理論。答えが見つかるまで実験を続ける」。

EN

but I listened to the thing like two or three times and thank god that now it's public anybody could just type in Spotify or product story I think is the name of the podcast. I'm like why don't more companies do this? Like I'm not an employee, but if I was coming into Dell or any other company now and I could have here here's eight, you know, eight 1-hour episodes and they say not just this decision was made like why these are the constraints we were under. This is what was going on.

センラ#47

いまもそれをやっている。ポッドキャストで会社全体に言った言葉が好きで読み上げる。

「5年後、新しい競合が来る。僕らがいるすべての事業に入り、より速く、より効率的で、より有能で、僕らを潰す。それを防ぐ唯一の方法は、僕らがその会社になることだ。事業を再発明・再想像するのは内臓がよじれるようなことだ。でもやらなければ潰れる」。

EN

Exactly. So, you know, if we walk downstairs right below this room where we are, there's a new class of

デル#48

そのとおり。ChatGPT が2022年11月頃に出て、「これは大きい、面白い」と思った。LLM の改善速度が見えてきて、技術では学習曲線から「1年後、2年後、3年後どこへ行くか」をプロットできる。エージェント、マルチエージェント、膨大な情報に対する推論——知識労働と人間のツールはどう変わるか。大きな話だ。事業の考え方を完全にリセットし、5年後のプロセスを再想像し、再フレーミングしないといけない。

前と同じことを続ければ深刻なことになる。新しい会社が来て、新しいツールを全部持ち、過去のレガシーのガラクタもなく、新しいやり方だけでやる。変わらなければ潰れる。危機がなければ危機を作れ、という信念もある。人を興奮させ、動機づけ、必要な変化を駆動する。

ある意味これは技術の問題じゃない。技術は使う使わないにかかわらずそこにある。チームをどう組織し、どう動機づけ、どう道具を与え、どう協働の構造を作って速くやるかだ。10年、20年、30年同じやり方をしてきた人に突然新しいものが来ると「やりたくない」となる。人は変化を嫌う。でもやらなければならない。それをやってきた。

EN

small business salespeople being trained. Okay. And you would love for those team members to be able to understand, okay, how did we get here? What are all the things that that you know we did right and wrong? And to really deeply understand the culture, the values, the beliefs and then to be able to build on that with their own contributions.

センラ#49

極めて珍しい。本にもある——IBM が「PC はいい、メインフレームの立派な端末になる」と言った話。何十年も続く伝記で何度も見る。会社も人も、成功した現在と違う未来を想像できず、切り捨てるか無視する。

Dell はマイクロコンピュータ、クライアントサーバ、インターネット……何回の技術革命を乗りこなして再発明してきた? 4つ5つ数えられるが、君は?

EN

Yeah. Kind of bring them up to speed. And this is the context. I also think there's a additional benefit for for it to make it public facing because humans buy stories. Money flows as a function of stories. And I've experienced this. It's like if I read I spend, you know, 40 hours reading about this person that had this idea in their head. They built a company. At the end of that, you're going to have a way better appreciation. I would find buying my buying their products that I never even would have thought of because now I understand the story. Um, I just reread James Dyson's uh autobiography, which is one of my favorite books, probably my number one recommendation out of the 400 books I've read so far, just because it's like 90% just struggle. The first autobiography is just like, I'm failing for 14 years. This guy is like a mule. He won't give up. 5,127 prototypes, but there's an idea in the book I thought was smart where he understood the power of storytelling. Okay? And so he's like, you're going to walk into the retailer, you're going to see six different vacuum cleaners. His obviously is designed different so it's going to catch your eye. But he insisted they wrote like a 200word story on like a little flyer, right? Maybe like a little piece of cardboard and that you could attach it to the handle of

デル#50

たぶん6つか7つ。

EN

the vacuum cleaner. And what happens if that person humans are attracted to stories are attracted to people, right? And so they would they'd read that and then they it would increase their sales because they understood who's behind this, why did they make it, how is it different? like it was a very effective sales tool. Um, so I I think like doing podcasts like this, books, anything like this where you can actually tell like why you're doing what you're doing. This is the crazy thing. I've heard from I don't know I probably got thousands of messages about the episode I did uh on you and the most common thing was I knew the name. I had no idea. Everybody knows Dell, the brand name, right? but they didn't understand just how crazy your story and the the multiple different transformations you've had to make over 41 years and now they're like, "Oh, this guy like I'm so glad you you put that in front of me." I think it's like a super important idea.

センラ#51

そのうち「これはうまくいった/これはダメで直した」と本にもある。完璧じゃない。でも波ごとのエコーや、再発明に使える共通の構造はある?

EN

It's all it's all been a lot of fun and and and still and still is and and it feels like we're just getting started actually when when I think about the business and the opportunities we have and uh yeah, it's all fun. You mentioned earlier that you benefited from studying people that came before you and this is you know you wanted to pass that forward like who are a few of the people that you study you felt you learn from or that influence like your thinking about how you're building how you built your business

デル#52

ある。ただ、起き方の時間軸が縮んでいる。インターネットを考えてほしい。まずネット、ワールドワイドウェブ、90年代半ばにサイトが現れ、eコマースの本格ブームまでだいたい10年かかった。90年代末〜2000年代初頭にも動いていたが、長い時間がかかった。いまは5〜10倍速い。ツール利用の伸びを見るとわかる。

連続する技術波は前の基盤の上に乗るから速く動ける。50億人がデバイスでつながっていれば、ツールの採用は一気に速い。頭の中に置いておくべきは、「どんな新しいものにも成功のチャンスがある」という感覚だ。全部切り捨てると見逃す。突飛なアイデアにも成功の可能性があると保持し、意味を理解し、交点——何をすべきか、いつ関連・価値・脱出速度に達するか——を探す。パラダイムに固着して切り捨てると見逃す。

EN

you know when I was a when I was a kid I I I you would read about entrepreneurs you know that were starting companies Charles Schwab or Fred Smith certainly uh Sam Walt some of the early telecom pioneers, uh, people that were doing it right then, like in in the 70s. And those stories were also were just super interesting to me. And I I grew up in in Houston, which was kind of a boom town. You'd see these new companies being created and parents were talking about that. And so th those those stories were always just interesting and and compelling and you want to understand well how did they do that and why did they do that and you know what happened and you know I never imagined myself doing anything else other than starting a business. You know the idea just was in my in my consciousness from from a very early age. this great line that Jeff Bezos says where he's like our passion we don't choose our passions our passion choose us. I think there's multiple mar like my notes myself in the margins like oh he's compelled he's like this is coming through him like he's like he has no choice he's this is going to happen but is there anybody in particular that you like really like honed in on and admired and tried to emulate in some way? I always think you you can you can learn from just about anybody whether they succeeded or failed. And so I tried to just understand, you know, uh as many people as I could that were entrepreneurs that were starting businesses. How did they struggle? What what worked? What didn't work? And those were always the compelling and interesting stories. When you were 15, you met you were I think at some kind of conference with and this is the first time you ever was were in the presence of Steve Jobs. I think Steve was like 25 at the time.

センラ#53

すべての可能性に開いている必要がある。でもそれは人間の習慣性と逆だ。高校・大学で聴いた音楽に固着するように、人は「見つけた」「好きなやり方」に止まる。君は新しい技術と古い問題の新しい解き方に開いている、あるいは中毒している。

EN

So when was he somebody like when you saw him at 15 and you saw okay wait this is a young kid in his 20s building a computer company. Was like that a model for you or like what was your interpretation of like that experience? I guess what I'm trying to get at.

デル#54

この手のものが大好きだ。

EN

Yeah. So, you know, in in the early days of of the computer industry, you know, as I knew it, the microprocessor based computer industry,

センラ#55

新しいアイデアをつぶさないには? 「どんなアイデアでもいまは効きうる。みんなつながっていて想像より速く伸びる」。でも新しいアイデアは脆く、保護と時間が要る。多くの人は即座に切り捨てる。

EN

you know, Apple was a leading company and Steve was obviously the sort of legendary figure. So,

デル#56

良いアイデアでもタイミングが悪いことがある。良いアイデアでも会社が違うことがある。ただの悪いアイデアのこともある。絶対はない。変化が速い可能性に開いている必要がある。5年前のトップのコンピュータ科学者・AI研究者に「LLM は次の5年でこうなる」と言っても、100人中99人は「それは起きない」と言っただろう。現代の良い例だ。変化の可能性に開いていなければならない。

だいたい10年ごとに、業界の機会集合を一気に広げるものが来る。それが毎日の仕事の楽しさ・興奮・面白さの一部だ。

---

EN

I was in this Apple user group, which is a bunch of, you know, geeky people would like get together and and you don't exactly and uh and, you know, sort of compare. Yeah,

センラ#57

聞いていて思った。人間が未来を正確に予測できないことと、反復・大量の実験・きついフィードバックループの重要性が結びついている。「効かなかった。別のやり方で試す」。未来を予測するのではなく、反復で未来を作る。

EN

you know how they had souped up their computers and software they had written and learned from each other and so you know Steve came to speak to our user group and yeah I mean he you know he he he he was like using these incredible you know metaphors and like listening to him and uh looking at what Apple's doing and going wow that's that's really And you know, you you'd also start started hearing about Bill Gates, you know, who's also about the same age as Jobs. And you know, they're both about 10 years older than than I am. And you kind of look at them and go, "Well, okay, they did something cool. May maybe maybe I've got a shot."

デル#58

予測を試みるのもいい。ただすごく難しい。実験をたくさん持っておくべきだ。10年前の「専門家」「賢い人」が、いま起きていることをどれだけ予測できたか? あまりできていない。頼りすぎるな。

EN

Yeah, that's really cool. There was uh something you mentioned to me uh when we had dinner that has been rattling around in my head and I think it's part of the reason that I couldn't sleep and I don't even think it was like explicit advice. I think you were just making an observation but you said something along the lines that um you know you've seen how countless different companies and entrepreneurs come and go over you know four decades, four plus decades. And you said something that terrified me unintentionally. Uh that most of the entrepre most entrepreneurs and founders that you you you've known were never taken out by competition that they sabotaged themselves. Can you say a little bit about that? Yeah, I mean I think I think you could you could make the argument that that they made mistakes along the way that that uh you know were fatal and and you know ultimately uh you know the companies didn't didn't succeed. Um but it's it's all of their own doing, right? Uh you know you have to make the right choices in order to to continue on and and survive and ultimately thrive. What do you think are some of the causes of mistakes? You have obviously smart, talented, competitive people, right? Charlie Mer has this great line where it's like intelligent people are taken up by three things: ladies, liquor, and leverage. So, like what do have you seen any common like causes for somebody to sabotage themselves or to not live up to what they should have?

センラ#59

だから起業家は過去の起業家を学ぶ。偉大な者はみんな偉大な者を学んできた——今日も40年前も200年前も。一般社会の「専門家」観と伝記の世界は違う。伝記では専門家をかなり切り捨てる。ダイソンの自伝はエディソニアンな設計——反復で学び、予測しきれない——で、ヘンリー・フォードを何度も引用する。30年後の自伝でもフォードが出る。

13歳の娘は ChatGPT をセラピスト、買い物相手、友達のエコシステムとして使う。予測できない。フォードの自伝(約120年前)にこうある。「競合を破壊したければ専門家で埋めよ。専門家は知っていることが多すぎて、自分が正しいと確信しすぎて、仕事が進まない」。

EN

Charlie's right about those three things. Uh, you know, we we we we stay away from those.

デル#60

極限では誰も何も知らない。未来を考えるとき、悪くない哲学だ。でも仮説・アイデア・実験は持って、心は開いておくのがいい。

EN

Yeah. Um, I sort of go back to understanding things and curiosity. And it's like you got to you got to know why something is working or not working. And if you're in the middle of of a super competitive uh endeavor and you don't really uh completely understand what's going on, well, you're going to make mistakes, right? And so, uh, you know, when I when I look at the the competitors that that that are no longer around, yeah, they they, uh, they, you know, had either overzealously expanded or made, you know, design, you know, uh, errors or they failed to understand the competitive, uh, landscape. I mean, there's lots of ways to fail, right?

センラ#61

では「向こうが来て、速く効率的で有能で僕らを潰す。そうさせない。僕らが変身する」——当時の仮説は?

EN

You have a great example of one in the book with Adam Osborne where he had a very successful I think the Osborne one was relatively successful, right?

デル#62

シンプルだ。ソフト開発からサポート、セールス、サプライチェーンまで、事業のコアプロセスすべてを劇的に改善できる。それをやっている。データを取り、プロセスを再想像し、単純化・標準化すると、はるかに効くようになる。

例はサポートだ。マシンからのテレメトリ(ソフトエラー、利用パターン)、保証データ、過去の通話ログ、ナレッジベース、Jira——何百万もの文書。人間が全部解釈できない。そこで Next Best Action というツールを作った。顧客が解こうとしている問題を理解し、顧客本人かエージェントに、最少ステップで最良の解き方を示す。助ける側は「肩に天才が乗っていて、仕事がうまくなった」と感じ、顧客はもっと幸せで、問題は速く解け、通話は要約されて時間も節約される。全部良くなる。

同じことをコーディングアシスタントによるソフト開発、セールスのツールでもやっている。事業全体でやっている。顧客もやっている。何が起きるか。データとコンピュートとモデルの力を解き放つ。Dell 自身がコンピュート・ストレージ・ネットワーキングの事業でもあるから、顧客がデータを解き放つのを助ける巨大な機会でもある。

発明される具体的なツールは予測できなかった。新しい技術があり、事業内のすべてのプロセスを変える、とだけわかっていた。やらなければ競合がやって終わりだ。競合もやって打ち消し合うだけでも、やらざるを得ない。選択の余地はない。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#63

アンドリュー・カーネギーの伝記に同じテーマがある。製鉄の前からそれなりに裕福だったが、鉄鋼が人生最大の機会だと気づくと全力投入し、新聞で株価を気にしたくなくて株も売った。イングランドからベッセマー法を持ち込み、既存の古い経営者たちは変化に抵抗し、新しい機械に金を使う彼を嘲笑した。より良い機械が出るたびに古いのを引き抜いて入れ替えた。

伝記のその箇所はまさにいまの話だ。競合に対する優位が得られなくても、やらなければ向こうが優位に立つ。採用しなかった側は廃業した。技術に投資せよ。節約は複利し、遅い競合に対する優位になり、黒字と赤字の差になりうる——という趣旨だ(要約)。テーマが何度も再登場するのが面白い。

EN

Okay.

デル#64

まさにそう。何をやっているか全員に知らせたいわけでもない。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#65

ポッドキャストでよく使う格言は「bad boys move in silence」。最先端にいると本がないことがある。『Becoming Steve Jobs』に、アニメのビジネスモデルをスティーブが知らない、という話がある。ディズニーと組む。「図書館で『アニメのビジネスモデル』という本は借りられない。うまくやった会社はディズニーだけで、どれだけ儲かるか誰にも知られたくない」。

ザックが聞けと言ったのが Dad Terminal だ。

EN

And he's like, "All right, now we we're coming out with Osborne 2. It's even new and improved and it's great." And you make the point, he's just like, "Yeah, maybe, but it didn't ship in time." And so now you just made this big announcement. You're like, "We have this great new product. It's even better than one." What are you telling to the market?

デル#66

そう。特定のテーマや質問について父に「ログイン」する、という言い方だ。ザックとのいちばん好きな時間のひとつだ。彼の事業の課題を解きながら、自分が犯したミス、他人が犯したミス、学んだことを共有して、痛みと回り道を少しでも減らしたい。

EN

The the Osborne fact. I don't think people talk about it so much anymore, but back then the Osborne effect was a thing where you introduce a new product that's better than your first product and nobody buys your first product anymore and you're you're out of business. And so, you know, yeah, don't want to do that. So, so go make some mistakes nobody's ever made before. Try to make them in small increments.

センラ#67

なぜ Terminal なのか聞いたら、Bloomberg 端末の比喩だと言った。質問を入れて高度な答えが返る。自分は Bloomberg ではなく Dad Terminal を使う、と。最後のクエリは何かと聞いたら「サプライチェーン」と当然のように言った。ポッドキャストをやって本を読む僕にはサプライチェーンがない。彼は「父が世界クラスな領域がいくつもあり、そのひとつがサプライチェーン」と言った。なぜそこが強いと言われる? 冒頭の好奇心のパズルの別表現?

EN

Fix your mistakes as fast as you find them. And you actually want to make mistakes. You just want to make them small and you know iterate and fix them quickly. I mean one of the things when you're when you're creating a new business in an area that is never been done

デル#68

確かに重要なパズルで、クリティカルなパズルだ。サプライチェーンをうまくやらなければ、今日ここにいない。それだけシンプルで、事業の根本だ。たくさん考えて、たくさんミスして、たくさん学んで、何が効き何が効かないかを見つけてきた。

EN

or with some new technology, new business model, there's no playbook. There's no like uh book you can read says here's how you do it, right? Yeah. And and if you hire the people from the adjacent, you know, industry companies and ask them to go do it, well, they're just going to go do what they were doing before, right? And so that's not going to work. So you need a lot of creativity and you need to sort of intuit it your way to the answer by experimenting. It's like, okay, uh here's a theory that we think will work. Let's try it. Right? and and and and you know, does it work? Great. Okay, let's do 2x that. Okay, let's do 10x that. Let's do 100x that. Doesn't work. Okay, let's stop, you know, restart, come up with another theory, and just keep experimenting until you find the answer. You're kind of going through that now. In fact, I want to read something that you said that was one of the most interesting things. You said it on a podcast and uh you made this, you essentially talked to your entire company and you said, I'm just going to read this quote. I stood up and told the company that five years from now, I love this so much. I stood up and told the company that five years from now, we will have a new competitor. And that new competitor is going to be in every business that we are in except they're going to be faster, more efficient, and more capable. And they're going to put us out of business. And the only way that we're going to prevent that is we are going to become that company. It's gutwrenching stuff to reinvent and reimagine your business. But if you don't do it, you go out of business.

センラ#69

本では、中間業者を排して源泉に近づく、という話がある。20歳くらいで初めてアジアに行った、という描写だった。

EN

Yeah. Exactly. So, you know, when uh Chat GPT came out in November of 22 or so, looking at this and going, "Wow, this is a big deal. This is this is pretty interesting." And you started to see the rate of improvement in the LLM. And you you you know, in technology, you can you can sort of look at the the rate of improvement and the learning curve, and you can sort of plot, well, where's this thing going, right? where's it going to be in a year or two years or three years? And you look at, okay, we're going to uh have agents and multi- aent systems and we're going to be able to reason over incredible amounts of information. Well, what does that actually mean for the way knowledge work gets done and the tools that humans are going to have? So, you think about that, you go, "Wow, this is a big big deal here. um we need to totally reset how we're thinking about the business and reimagine it, reframe it and understand what the processes are going to look like in 5 years. And so you do you do all that and you say, "Uh, if we keep doing what we were doing before, we're going to be in serious trouble because some new company's going to come along and yeah, they're going to have all these new tools. They're not going to have this legacy of crap from the past, right? Old ways of doing things, and they're just going to do it the new way. And so we have to change or we're going to go out of business. You know, I also believe in this idea that uh if you don't have a a crisis, make one, right? You know, you get people excited, motivated, and to drive the the necessary change. I mean, in one in one sense, this is not a technology problem. The technology is there whether you use it or not. It's a it's a question of how do you organize the team and people to actually go and get this thing done? How do you motivate them? How do you give them the right tools? How do you structure uh you know the uh ways people work together so that you can do it quickly? And it's very hard for people to, you know, if you've been doing something for 10 years or 20 years or 30 years the same way and all of a sudden it's like some new thing comes along, you're like, "No, I don't want to do that." You know, people don't like to change. But you have to. And so that's what we've been doing. Yeah. This is excessively rare. I mean, think about the story in the book where I think the line that I summarized where you were saying about IBM's like, "Yeah, the personal computer's, you know, fine. it's going to be a great terminal for the mainframe. And it's just like, oh, you see this over and over again in these biographies if you're studying, you know, something that's occurring over multiple decades. It's like companies and people cannot envision a future that's different from the present that they succeeded in. So they kind of like dismiss it, dismiss it or kind of ignore it. I I'm trying to think though like so you just said, okay, there's no books like what you guys are doing right now, Dell, right? You can't there's like you're on the cutting edge. There's no there's no books you can read about it. But you have surfed how many different technological revolutions? You did the micro processor, right? That micro computer, sorry. Uh the personal computer. Um then obviously the internet was invented.

デル#70

1985年頃。当時は中国本土に本当に入れる感じではなく、作っているものもほとんどなかった。行ったのは日本、香港、台湾、韓国だ。

EN

Client server technology a little bit before you.

センラ#71

興奮が好きだ。事業への深い愛があり、玉ねぎをさらにむいて源泉に近づく。1日16時間、オフィスで寝て、顧客と社員と売上成長——その理解がどんどん深くなる。20歳の男の本能は消えていない。世界と事業の位置づけを、もっと深く理解し続けている。

EN

How many? So like I got four or five. How many have you successfully navigated and had to reinvent Dell over and over again? How many of these like huge shifts do you think you've navigated? Yeah, there's probably been six or seven of them.

デル#72

もちろん。そうするものだろ? 物事を理解するものだろ?

EN

So, if you've done that six or seven times and then I think in the book, you know, obviously you say we did really great on this one, not good on this one, but we we fixed that. You're not going to be perfect over that many decades. But do you see like

センラ#73

「もちろん」と言う。夕食でも言ったが、他にどうやるのかわからない。君の頭の中の異常なほど価値のあるものを外に出すのが、本やこの会話の意味だ。

EN

is there like an echo between all of these like that you can apply like certain ideas you can take away and like form or structure like oh that's kind of similar to what we had to do when we had to reinvent for X.

デル#74

他のやり方を知らない。

EN

Yeah, there are. Although the the the time frames that these things occur tend to be shrinking.

センラ#75

自分がどれだけ異常かわからないからだ。夕食の途中で言った。頭の中で解けないパラドックスがある。僕は異常な人を職業的に研究している。君は異常の中の異常だ。4十年のクレイジーな旅と、一方で礼儀正しく落ち着いて測られた人柄——この両立が解けない。この稀少さを理解している?

EN

Say more about that.

デル#76

いや、毎日起きてやるだけだ。僕にはかなり普通に見える。

EN

So if you think about the the internet, you know, when you know, first you had the internet, you had the worldwide web, right? and websites started popping up in the mid '9s and then you know but it took like a decade before there was really a boom in things like e-commerce and I mean it was it was going on uh in the late 90s and you know early 2000s but it it really didn't it took a long long time so now uh maybe it's like five to 10 times faster

センラ#77

だから君はすごい。本を読む人で「この人普通だ」と思う人はいない。シドニー・ハーマン——Harman Kardon の人——の言葉で、「創業者は会社の魂の守護者だ。創造物と創造者は切り離せない」。

EN

you know if if you look at the growth in the usage of these tools. And part of it is that each successive uh wave of technological improvement is built on the prior w you know foundations and so they're able to go faster. So if you have five billion people connected with all kinds of devices, well now they can use these tools and that just goes way faster. And I I I think you have to have this idea in your head that any uh you know new thing has some chance of succeeding, right? And and

デル#78

僕はそれに似ている。

EN

say more about that.

センラ#79

そのとおりだ。また異常さだ。本物に自分らしい事業を作れ、とよく言う。リー・ウォーカーが語る——IBM と戦い、金がなく、背中が痛み、髪が抜け、眠れない。でもマイケルは有頂天で、オフィスまでタップダンスしている。「彼は自分に自然な事業を作った」。だから君には異常じゃない。

EN

So there's a lot of wild ideas out there and if you dismiss them all, you're going to miss some some things. So, so you you you you kind of have to hold this idea in your head that uh any of these wild ideas has a chance of succeeding and let's sort of understand what do all these things mean and figure out what is the point of intersection right you know what should we be doing about this and when when is it actually relevant interesting valuable and it's sort of, you know, hits escape velocity and if you're if you're sort of stuck in a particular paradigm or you're like dismissing things, you're going to miss them.

デル#80

41年毎日やっていると、かなり普通に感じる。

---

EN

Yeah. And and so and so, uh, you know, you need to be open-minded enough to consider all possibilities, but your ability to do that is so counter to human nature cuz we're habitual. like we're habitual creatures, you know? It's like, "Oh, I found what I want or I found like what I like to do and like this is the best, you know, like if you look at like what people what music people listen to, for example, it's like music you listen to when you're like high school and college and maybe you've added a couple, but like you're kind of like just stuck on that where you are just like completely open, maybe addicted to, you know, new technology and new ways to think about or new ways to solve like old problems."

センラ#81

リー・ウォーカー。21歳の頃に粘り強く口説いた。彼は45歳くらい。Dell のその時点で、彼はどんな役割だった?

EN

Yeah, I love I love this stuff. But how do you not squash new ideas? Like you just said like you know that those are great lines like any idea can work now. Everybody's connected and they can grow faster than you can possibly imagine. So how do you like do you have a process for like how do you not you know new ideas are fragile and you know they need some kind of protection and some time to grow like but most people just like kind of snuff them out or dismiss them immediately. Well, you know, sometimes uh it it's a it's a good idea, but it's the wrong time.

デル#82

ロケットは飛び始めていたが脆かった。いいアイデアはあったが欠落が多かった。リーは欠落を埋め、制御不能なカオスを整理し、事業をスケールさせた。

EN

Sometimes it's a good idea, but it's the wrong company. Sometimes it's just a bad idea, right? And so,

センラ#83

オペレーション?

EN

um but there's no absolutes here, right? You you you just have to be open-minded and consider the possibility that things are changing fast enough that uh you know some some new thing comes along. If you took the top computer scientists uh you know and researchers in AI or just broadly you know five years ago and you said okay you know this is what's going to happen with LLMs in the next 5 years probably 99 out of 100 would say no no that's not going to happen right and so uh that's a that's a pretty good example in contemporary period here, you know, where you you just need to be uh open to the possibility that things are going to change. And and and there's also this thing where about every 10 years or so, something comes along and just completely expands the opportunity set for the industry. And that's part of the fun, the excitement, the super interesting aspect of what we get to do every day. The best leaders in business are able to spot patterns. But you can't spot patterns if you can't see your data. And most businesses are only using 20% of their data because 80% of your customer intelligence is invisible, hidden in emails, transcripts, and conversations. Unless you have HubSpot. HubSpot is where all of your data comes together so you can see the patterns that matter. Because when you know more, you grow more. And that is a pattern that never fails. Visit hubspot.com today. That is hubspot.com.

デル#84

まず成長が速すぎて、バランスシートも資本も追いついていなかった。クレジットラインを取り、資本を解放し、自分が知らなかった・興味が薄かったオペレーション(技術や顧客以外)を整えた。さらに資本が要るとプライベートプレースメント、上場へと進め、10倍・100倍成長の準備をした。

EN

I just had a thought listening to you speak tied to something else that you said earlier. It's like basically humans inability to have accurate predictive behav predictions about the future. It's kind of tied to the importance of iterating and make sure you're doing a lot of experiments and then having that like tight feedback loop to constantly like get information. Oh, that didn't work. Okay, we ran experiment didn't work. Let's try it a different way. Like those two like those two things work really well together. It's like we're we're not going to predict the future. We're going to create the future through iteration.

センラ#85

リーの話で面白かったのは、個人向けでクレジットで先に金をもらう段階から、エンタープライズ——テキサコのような巨大企業——に上がったときだ。年商6000万ドルくらいで銀行口座に20万ドルしかない、みたいな場面。キャッシュがない。リーは銀行に行き、関係があった。

EN

Yeah. And and you know, it's okay to try to predict it as well. It's just really hard to do. And you know, you might want to have a lot of experiments. I mean, if you go back and and say, okay, let's say you had somebody who was supposed to be really smart or supposed to be an expert at something, right? 10 years ago, how good were they at predicting what was going to happen?

デル#86

あった。

EN

Not very good. No, so so uh don't rely too much on that, right? This is why I think uh entrepreneurs have to like study past entrepreneurs too and it's like obviously very valuable like it's it's no surprise that like you were reading about these people like what I always say is like the greats all studied the greats this is like very like they were doing it today they were doing it 40 years ago they were doing it 200 years ago if you took like an average person in normal society and the way they think about experts okay and the way it's discussed in all these biographies it's like they're very dismissive of experts right I just mentioned I was reading James Dyson's uh autobiography, you know, the whole thing is just like he believes in the Edisonian principle of design, just this constant iteration. You learn as you go. You can't predict like you're you just, you know, change one thing and then test it and see how it goes. And he mentions setting Henry Ford a lot in that book. And then James wrote an autobiography 30 years after that that he also mentions Henry Ford a lot. And the reason I thought of that is because as you were speaking about, you know, you go and ask an expert from 10 years ago, what's going to happen? Like they're not going to tell you that chat GPT is abs, you know, that my 13-year-old, I use chat GP all the time, but I'm a nerd. I like to research stuff. I like to read about stuff. She uses like a therapist, a shopper, a friend, like it's an entire ecosystem. There's no way you can you can um predict that. So there's a great line in Henry Ford's autobiography, which was written 120 years ago. And this is not a new phenomenon. Human nature does not change. History doesn't repeat. Human nature does. And he says, "If I ever want to sabotage my competition, I would fill their ranks with experts. Experts tend to know so much." And they're they're so convinced that they're right, they'd get no work done.

センラ#87

「リーは信用する。でもこの子供は知らない」。リーは「俺も子供も信用しなくていい。発注書を見ろ。テキサコは払うと思うか?」とやった。売掛に対して貸せ、というアイデアだ。

EN

Yeah. At the limit, nobody knows anything, right? And it's not a bad uh philosophy,

デル#88

売掛ベースのファイナンスだ。21歳でほぼ資本なし、最初は1000ドルで始めた事業を、社内に信頼できる知人がいない状態で銀行が見ると、「何か他をやろう」が一般的な反応だ。リーには関係と信頼があり、説明できて、詰まりを壊し、成長に必要な資本の一部を得た。

EN

you know, when when when you're thinking about the future.

センラ#89

負のキャッシュ・コンバージョン・サイクルにどう辿りつき、なぜ強力だったか説明して。

EN

Um it's good to have a hypothesis though, right? and and and and ideas and experiments and to keep an open mind.

デル#90

資本がなかった。在庫を劇的に減らし、顧客から速く回収し、仕入先への支払いは即時ではなく少し遅らせる。成長していてキャッシュ・コンバージョン・サイクルが負なら、実は現金をたくさん生む。成長のために調達する資本が少なくて済み、資本利益率が高い。そう見るようになった。

競合は長く伸びたサプライチェーンを持っていた。ディストリビュータとディーラーがあり、製品ができてから顧客に届くまで集合在庫が90日くらい。チップに製造週の日付が刻印されていた——「4292」なら92年の第42週。箱を開けて在庫の古さを測れた。僕らは5日くらいにできた。クレイジーなほどの優位だった。

電子部品の価格は一般に下がる。予測可能な傾向だ。部品が5日齢で競合が90日齢なら、向こうの原価は高い。構造的競争優位だ。さらに最新・最良の技術を売れる。90日ものの魚やバナナではない。最新チップ、最新能力。また別の優位だ。顧客から「これが欲しい、これを変えて」という信号が返り、動的なフィードバックループが生まれる。それを作り、効き、反復し、進化させた。競合は切り捨て、誤解してくれた——素晴らしかった。

EN

So, what was when we go back to that, hey, this they're coming for us, they're going to be faster, more efficient, more capable, uh and they're going to put us out of business and we're not going to let that happen because we're going to transform. We are going to be that business, right?

センラ#91

どう誤解する? 説明したくない、という話?

EN

What was your hypothesis back then? Do you remember?

デル#92

いまなら説明できる。当時は何が起きているか知られたくない。見えないでいてほしい。

EN

Oh, it's pretty simple. It's that it will be possible to dramatically improve the way we do things in all the core processes of the business from software development to support to sales to every major function our supply chain everything can be improved in a dramatic way and that's what we're doing and we're we're finding you know as we take our data as we reimagine the processes and simplify and standardize them we can uh make them way more effective. So you know an example would be uh in support we have incredible amounts of data. We have telemetry data that the machines are giving us all the time right about uh you know soft errors and all these things that are going on you know inside the usage patterns from customers. We have warranty data uh you know we have previous call logs. We have all these knowledge bases. We have Jira databases. It's like millions and millions of documents. No human could ever interpret all this. And so we created this tool called Next Best Action which takes all this data and understands what problem the customer is trying to solve and it helps uh either the customer or the agent that's trying to help the customer get to exactly the best way to solve that problem. in the fewest possible steps. And so the person helping them feels like, "Wow, I'm way better at my job than I used to be because now I got this genius on my shoulders telling me exactly how to solve this problem. The customer's way happier. Uh the problem's solved way faster and the tool summarizes the call. So that saves a ton of time and so everything gets way better. So you can take that same example and you know software development with coding assistants. Our sales teams have access to incredible tools. And so we're doing this all over our business. And of course our customers are doing it. And what is this doing? It's unlocking the power of data using compute and using all these models which also happens to be you know uh we're in the business of compute and storage and networking. So, it's an enormous uh opportunity for for for Dell itself to be able to help all of our customers unlock the power of their data. You couldn't predict like the actual tools that were going to be invented. You just knew that now we have this new there's there's this new technology that it will transform every single uh process inside the business. We not be a we won't be able to predict like all the tools, but we just know that they're coming. If we didn't do that and our competitors did, we'd be we'd be finished, right? And so we're not going to do that. And uh you know, even if we did it and our competitors did it, uh let's say it just neutralizes, you have to do it. You have no choice.

センラ#93

面白い話がある。世界で最も裕福な人の一人——76歳、二代目、家族経営の巨大海運——と夕食した。本を書いて歴史を残す話をしたら、一族は本物の著者に伝記を委嘱していた。ISBN がなく市販されない本。家に数冊ある。エピソードをやらせてくれと言ったら即座に「絶対ダメ。競合を教育する気はない」。優位があるなら黙れ、という話だ。

当時の IBM とコンパックは君の優位を理解していなかった。IBM は古く硬い大企業——まだわかる。コンパックは創業者が経営していた。どうして正確に分析できなかった? 君を脅威と思わず切り捨てていた?

EN

Yeah. There's a line in uh Andrew Carnegie's biography. It was really fascinating because, you know, he dabbled in a bunch of different businesses. He was pretty wealthy before he started the steel company. But once he realized that, you know, think about how important steel was at that time. It's like everything this is the new the new product that everything every other product is going to be made out of. Uh from bridges to railroads and everything else like this is the biggest opportunity in my life. I'm going to go all in on it. To the point where he didn't even want any distractions. He sold all of his stocks cuz he didn't want to find himself looking at the newspaper to wonder like what the price of stock was. Like fully focused on the greatest opportunity of my entire life. He went into an existing business that was run by older gentlemen, right? He had this new way to do steel. I think it's Bessemer steel that he got from England. So he took the idea from England, imported into America, which it's kind of weird how often that is in the history of entrepreneurship where it's like, oh, this idea is working in one geography. Will it work over there? It's like, yeah, cuz humans are kind of the same everywhere. There's some, you know, cultural differences, but, you know, our our core motivations are, you know, uh, very similar. And, uh, they were very resistant to change. So they're like, "No, that's not the best process." And then they would ridicule him for investing in the newest technology. He was spending a ton of money. Every time there was a better machine, a more efficient machine, he would immediately rip out the old machine and input and put in the new technology of his day. We wouldn't think about his technology today. It's definitely technology back then. And when you read his autobiography, which you know is in the public domain, anybody could read it for free. It's it's an incredible gift to humanity there. I remember getting to this part of the biography which is exactly what you just said. It's like okay even if this doesn't give us advantage over our competitors if we don't do it like they will have the advantage. So even if we're on like on the same level and the the the summary of what Andrew Carnegie was saying these guys wind up not adopting the technology and they went out of business. So he says invest in this is not a direct quote this is me summarizing his idea says invest in technology. uh the savings compound. It can make the uh it gives you an advantage over uh your slower moving competitors and it can be the difference between a profit and a loss. If he didn't do that that investment into the new technology that his competitors were dismissing the stupid young kid with his fancy machine, right? That wind up making making his company profitable in a year or two and their company unprofitable and then slowly and slowly they just they kept losing money and then they went out of business.

デル#94

本人はまだ生きているから聞いてみればいい。バブルの中にいて、うまくいっていると周りが言い、別の情報を信じたくなくて切り捨てる、ということはあると思う。

EN

It's very fascinating how these like themes just keep reappearing.

センラ#95

ジェンセン・ファンの NVIDIA 史の本を読んだ? 脅威は下から来る、全部を船積みする——「ship the whole cow」——と格言化する。君の本の回でも言ったが、優位を一つずつ積み重ねている。最新技術、サプライチェーン、そして直接販売でより速いマシンを795ドルで出し、コンパックは店舗経由でより遅いマシンを1500ドル、という形で市場に表れる。創業者が「おや?」と思わないのが不思議だ。

EN

Exactly. you don't necessarily want everybody to know what you're doing. Also,

デル#96

向こうが見てすらいないことを望む。人間には「見て、すごいことをやっている、クールだろ」と言いたくなる本能がある。でもビジネスでは、競合が理解しない・見ない方がいい。店舗にないから、直接注文しない限り知りようがない。たぶん注文していなかった。注意を払っていればわかるが、気づかれず注意されないことを望む。

EN

the maximum I have from this I use on the podcast all the time is that bad boys move in silence. And so, you mentioned earlier that uh there's no sometimes there's no book. You're on the cutting edge. And so, I remember there's this great line in this biography of Steve called Becoming Steve Jobs, which I actually think is the best biography written about him. And Steve's like, I don't even know what the business model of animation is. And they start partnering with Disney. And he has this great line. He goes, "You can't go to the library and check out a book called The Business Model of Animation. There's only one company that's ever done it well. It's Disney, and they don't want anybody else to know how lucrative it is." One thing that was hilarious that your son, Zach, wanted me to ask about was what he calls Dad Terminal.

センラ#97

自然な北極星と執念の話に戻る。チップの週番号を見て「90日の優位」と読む——狂気だ。

EN

Yeah. So, dad terminal is is what he he refers to as when he kind of taps in and, you know, wants to talk about a particular topic or has a has a question. And it's one of my favorite times with Zach, you know, cuz cuz you know, we're we're talking about solving problems or challenges inside his business. And um you know I get to share the mistakes I made, mistakes I saw other people make, lessons learned and uh hopefully save him some some pain and suffering and you know uh steps from you know uh learnings along the way.

デル#98

難しくない。数字はそこにある。じっと見ている。語りかけてくる。

EN

Yeah. He says instead of typing in the re I was like why is it called I was like why is it called that terminal? I didn't understand what that was. And he's like, "Well, Bloomberg terminal." He's like, "You know?"

センラ#99

同意する。でもそれが取り憑かれている人とそうでない人の差だ。その創業者は強迫的にコンピュータを分解していなかった。本にある話——IPO やプライベートプレースメントの頃、ブラックフライデーで資本市場が揺れて、リーが「まずい」とオフィスに入ると、マイケルはまたコンピュータを分解していた。

EN

Exactly. Yeah.

デル#100

それがやることだ。まさにそれだ。

EN

He's like, "You subscribe, you log in, and you have a question, and then like you type in, you get this really advanced answer." He's like, "I don't use Bloomberg. I use my

センラ#101

いちばん大きいのは、エネルギーを向けた対象に終わりがないことだ。共通の友人サム・ヒンクリーの話——周りに置く人は興味の分野が違うが、共通点は「興味の底に辿り着けない」。カップに注いでも注いでも終わらない。名声や地位のためだと、ジェリー・サインフェルドの言うように「金のためだけならそこまでしか行けない」。

EN

I use that terminal." And I was like, "Give me an example like what is what's the last query into that terminal?" And he goes,

デル#102

情熱や執念だと、終わりがない。

EN

"Supply chain." He said it like it was like obvious. I was like, "I don't have a supply chain. I run a podcast. I read books. Like explain it to me." Uh he's like my there's a handful of things, not a handful, he's like there's a bunch of things my dad is world class at and he's just like one of them is supply chain. Um and I'm curious is like why you think you're why other people describe you as really good at that? Uh is that is supply chain is related back to how we started this discussion is just like another puzzle for you to like direct your curiosity to? It's definitely a an important puzzle

センラ#103

チップを分解して90日の優位を見て、資本市場の動揺より目の前の顧客と好奇心に集中する。起業の奇跡だ。

EN

and and a critical puzzle. I mean, I think if we had not uh figured out how to do our our supply chain well, um you know, we we would not be here today. It's as simple as that. So, it's a it's a fundamental thing that is just super important in it in our business. So, it's just you've thought more about this area over

デル#104

そのとおり。

EN

and and made and made a ton of mistakes and learned a ton of lessons and uh sort of, you know, figured out what works and what doesn't work.

センラ#105

コンパックと IBM に過小評価されたことが燃料になった、と本にある。力強い動機づけだったと。なぜそう感じた?

EN

Yeah. There's a line in the book, I think, the first time you realize, hey, I I don't like these. Your whole thing is eliminating middlemen and like getting as close to the source as possible. And um I think you're like n it might be 20 years old at the time, but you're taking your first trip to China if I'm not mistaken.

デル#106

過小評価されると、それが乗数になる。何をしているか理解されず、見えないまま来る。コンパックの CEO は「メールオーダー会社」「ガレージ運営」などと呼んでいた。それを聞いて「最高だ。何もわかっていない」。挫折や「潰れる」という通説が来るたび、ものすごく動機づけられた。

EN

Well, so that would have been 1985. It really wasn't you couldn't really go into mainland China at that point. There was nothing really to do there. They they weren't making anything.

センラ#107

いまも?

EN

So where you were going to Asia?

デル#108

もちろん。そうでなければたぶん死んでいる。

EN

You were going to Asia. So, yeah, I I went to I went to Japan, Hong Kong, uh Taiwan, and South Korea.

センラ#109

全部「もちろん」なのが好きだ。よくある誤解——最初に金を全部調達しないと、金を調達した競合に自動的に死ぬ、という話。コンパックは7500万〜1億ドル調達し、君は寮の1000ドルだ。若い起業家に助言するなら、いまは違う?

EN

Yeah. But what I love is just like how excited you were.

デル#110

会社・業界ごとに状況特異的だ。一般論は言えない。

EN

Oh, yeah.

センラ#111

「これをやらないと死ぬ」系の一般論はだいたい疑わしい。

EN

Because it's like you said something you said earlier. It's like you had a deep love for your business and then now you get to keep peeling back the onion and getting closer and closer to how now it's like, oh, I'm like spending 16 hours a day. I'm sleeping in my office. I'm working. I'm We have customers. We have we're hiring employees. of revenue growth. But now I'm getting like deep a deeper and deeper deeper understanding and like so as I read these biographies of people I try to like build like you know I I think I have a good sense of like how you think and like what's important to you. And what I realized is like that instinct that you had as a 20-year-old man or however old you were in at that time. It's like that has not you never been alleviated. It's just like this constant like keep going lower and lower and lower to like seek more a deeper understanding of like the world around you, but also how your business like fits in that world and how you can build technology to like enhance everybody else around you.

デル#112

絶対はない。誰かが誰も考えなかった賢いやり方を見つける可能性を常に開いておく。それが起きる。

EN

Yeah, of course. I mean, that's what you're supposed to do, right? You're supposed to understand things, right?

センラ#113

必要は発明の母。資本がないから顧客に先に払ってもらう——偶然たくさんの優位を発見し、理解が深まった。安く賢くやる、という他の起業家・事業の例は?

EN

You say, of course, like this is the f this is another thing I told you when we had dinner. Like,

デル#114

ウォルマート、コストコ、アマゾン——安く勝ち、コストを抜く賢いやり方を見つけた小売だ。

EN

how else would you do it? I don't know. But to you, this is this is why I think like writing the book and having conversations like this is important because like there's so much … in your head that is so unusual and like like just it's so valuable like getting it out and putting it like out into the world because I remember like

センラ#115

バナナ王サム・ザムリもそうだ。19歳で金がなく、港で「熟れすぎて2日でダメになるバナナ(ripes)」が捨てられているのを見て、鉄道で各停に売った。現金が生まれ、農園まで降りていった。小さな種から優位を積み重ねる。IKEA もメールオーダーから始まり、「どんな問題への高い解決策も凡庸のしるし」と言った。

EN

I wouldn't know any other way to do it.

デル#116

またメールオーダーだ。

EN

I know because you don't understand how how abnormal you are. So we were halfway through our dinner. I looked at you and I was like, dude, I have this paradox in my head that I cannot reconcile between like the your the crazy career that you've had. It's like I study uncommon people for a living. You are uncommon amongst uncommon people, right? You have this. So the paradox I couldn't reconcile is between this this crazy ride that you've had that's described beautifully in your book this four decade you know mission that you've that you've been on that you've relentlessly given a lot of your life energy to and just how normal you are like you're like not I'm talking about like your affectation your personality like you're very polite and calm and measured but it's like you understand how rare this is.

センラ#117

80年代、君たちは「メールオーダーのスティグマを破れ」とやっていた。

EN

No I know cuz you're like Of course you like it's this is what I love. It's like

デル#118

ブランドを確立する過程で、「メールオーダー会社」は蔑称・ステレオタイプだった。切り捨てる理由になる。プレスは何年も「メールオーダー会社 Dell がサーバを発表」と書いた。3万件の特許があっても、いつメールオーダーでなくなるのか。そのラベルを消さなければならなかった。

EN

just wake up every day and go do the thing.

センラ#119

どう破った?

EN

This is why you're great. This is why but that's that's why you're great. So like

デル#120

やり続けただけ。やがて「メールじゃなくてインターネットだ」になる。「誰が郵便で注文するんだ?」という話になる。

EN

seems pretty normal to me. There's nobody that reads this book like this guy's normal. No, it's not at all. So there's what I love about this and this is why it's so important because um and I mentioned this on the episode I made it on you, but there's this uh this engineer turn and uh turned u founder uh Sydney Harmon. You know the the company Harman Carden?

センラ#121

アイデアをつぶすな、という話とつながる。Dell はインターネット販売の先駆の一社だった。

EN

Yeah, sure.

デル#122

もともと直販だった。電話で注文を受け、FAX が山ほどある部屋があり、カタログもあった。ウェブが来て、「サイトを作ってカタログを載せてボタンで注文できる」——史上最高にクールだ、やらなきゃ、となった。最初の本の毎ページ下に www.dell.com とあった。人をサイトに連れていくことに取り憑いていた。簡単に人とつながる方法になった。

EN

Yeah. Yeah.

センラ#123

あの本は97、98年?

EN

So, he has a great line. He said that the founder is the guardian of the company's soul. That it's impossible to separate,

デル#124

98年だったと思う。サイトはかなり初期で、95〜96年頃。世界のサイトを全部回れた時代を覚えている。「もうサイトがない。今日は終わり」。いま聞くとクレイジーだが、すぐ変わった。

EN

you know, the the the creation from the creator. And I think over time, like the

センラ#125

オンラインで5万ドルのサーバを売ったとき、みんな「ありえない」と言った。いまほど速くはいかなかったが、世界中の企業と個人に直販する事業にはロケット燃料だった。機関向けはいつから?

EN

I resemble that.

デル#126

最初のフルイヤーで、すでに売上の80%超が企業向けだった。

EN

God damn right you do. This is also again how abnormal you are. I used to say it's like you need to build a business that's authentic to you. And then in this book, Lee was, you know, talking about he was only able to last four years, I think. Um, and he's just like, you know, we're fighting at IBM. We don't have any money. And he's like, "My back's hurting. I'm losing my hair. Like, I can't sleep." And he's just like, "Michael's ecstatic." He's like tap dancing to the office every day. And he said a line that changed like really made me think about something. He's just like, "He built a business that was natural to him. Of course you it's not abnormal to you because you built a business that's natural to you.

センラ#127

最初は医師や歯科医、弁護士だったイメージだが。

EN

Yeah. And if if you've been doing it every day for 41 years, it seems pretty normal, right?

デル#128

個人の医師・歯科医もいるが、技術支出全体を見るとだいたい75〜80%は企業。長いあいだそうだ。1年目から似た比率だった。大学や企業が5、10、20、50台と買っていた。

EN

On the last episode during my conversation with Daniel Ek, he said one of the most important ideas that I've heard. He said, "I'm not obsessed about time. I'm obsessed about energy management. If you have time but you have no energy, you're not going to accomplish anything anyways." I signed up for function long before they were a sponsor of this podcast. And when you sign up, they ask you what your health goals are. And my response in all caps was maximum energy. All of the founders, CEOs, and extreme winners I have studied have excessively high energy levels. If you're going to be the best at what you do, you need to maximize your energy and output. And that is why I've partnered with Function. Function provides access to comprehensive blood tests and other lab testing to help you improve your health so you can perform at your highest level. Function has made it easy for me to monitor and improve my internal health markers so that I feel at my absolute strongest. As a member of Function, you get access to test over a hundred of your biomarkers from hormones to toxins to markers of heart health, inflammation, and stress. function gives you a straightforward analysis of all your results along with advice from expert doctors on how to improve things like your testosterone, your stress hormones, how to reduce toxins in your body, and much more. The platform is absolutely beautiful and provides an easy to understand picture of your overall health. Once you try Function, you'll immediately understand why it's the fastest growing health platform in the country. To learn more about Function and to join, go to functionhealth.com/enra. Right now, Function is offering a $100 credit to the first thousand people who sign up for a function membership. To get this $100 credit, just visit functionhealth.comra. Again, that's functionhealth.com/enra. Lee Walker, tell me how important like that was finding a person cuz you were relatively persistent in recruiting him and you were like 21 I think at the time.

センラ#129

本でいちばん重要なアイデアのひとつだと思う。世代を超えて伝えたい。専門家への警戒と同様、エゴと自己確信の重要性について世間は逆に考えがちだ。「証拠を集めてから自信を持て」。でも本では信念が能力の前に来る。19歳で父に「人生で何がしたい」と聞かれ、「IBM と競争したい」と言う場面。ページの前に座ってほしい。1000ドルと UT の寮から世界最大の会社に挑む。「19歳で少し思い上がっていたか? そうだ。大事なことをやるにはそうでなければならない」。そのマインドセットを説明して。

EN

21. Yeah.

デル#130

ナイーブさと自信の組み合わせだ。うまくいかない理由をまだ知らない——それがナイーブで、ときに良い。慣習的思考に縛られない。あるいは賢い新しいやり方を思いつく。自信の側は「やってうまくさせる。解き明かす」。でも頭の中の小さな声——「もしダメなら? これは? あれは?」——は消えない。「絶対うまくいく」と決め込むと、その声を無視する。だからナイーブさと自信、両方だ。傲慢ゾーンには入らない。危険だ。

EN

And he was 45 or something like that. Yeah.

センラ#131

会社名を最初自分の名にしぶしぶしなかった話がいい例だ。最初は PCs Limited。

EN

Like what's the role that you feel he played at that point in Dell's history?

デル#132

正式には Dell Computer Corporation、商号 PCs Limited だった。

EN

Well, yeah, the company was was uh I mean it's like our rocket had sort of taken off but you know it was it was pretty fragile, right? And uh you know, we had some good ideas, but there was a a lot of missing pieces. And Lee helped fill in those missing pieces and, you know, sort of organize the uh uncontrolled chaos and helped us sort of really, you know, scale scale up the business

センラ#133

やがて Dell に。オズボーンの話を思い出した——自分の名を付けたら失敗したときどうする、という恐怖。自信はあっても疑いは消えない。

EN

in like operations like what do you think? Yeah, I mean it it was well well well first of all we were growing so fast we just we just didn't have the balance sheet or the capital to support our growth and so he helped us you know get some uh credit lines and you know that that you know freed up capital and then like you know sort of organized some you know some of the operations and stuff I didn't really know about or or have a great interest in, you know, because it wasn't the technology or or uh the customers.

デル#134

そう。そして恐怖。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#135

最後に聞きたい。先月ザックのオフィスを歩いていて、すぐ出た話だ。僕も同じだ。歴史上の起業家を研究して感じるし、君も同じだと言った——成功への愛より、いまも失敗への恐怖の方が大きな動機だ。

EN

And so he helped sort of get all that stuff on the right path. And then as we as we needed even more capital, you know, with a private placement, then going public, you know, he helped helped sort of get all that going. and you know just basically how do you how do you scale this thing up to get it ready for 10x or 100x growth. One thing I thought was very fascinating that Lee Walker said, right, is you got to the point where, you know, you had that negative cash conversion cycle where but you were selling to like individuals. So individuals like, "Oh, I want a computer, Michael. Okay, give me your credit card." You're like, "Great, I got this money, which we'll talk about in a minute." But now you've moved up and now you're doing enterprise. And some of these companies are huge like Texico and like these giant companies. And I remember one point in the book, it was something you were doing like 60 million a year in revenue and you had like 200 grand in your bank accounts or something. It's like just no cashier. And what was smart is he went to the banks and I was curious. It sounds like he had relationships with the bankers. And I always have this maximum that relationships run.

デル#136

完全に100%。失敗したくない。失敗は学び方でもあり、痛みは最良の教師で、小さな失敗は途中で必要だ。でも恐怖に麻痺して決断できなくなってはいけない。

EN

He did.

センラ#137

それは起きた?

EN

Okay. So relationships around the world. You see that over and over again. And so Lee had relationships with these these bankers that I assumed in the book and you just verified.

デル#138

あまりない。増分でやる。また反復だ。「いいアイデアかわからない。試そう。実験を始めよう。会社全体を賭けるのではなく実験だ。ダメなら学びを得て次へ」。

EN

But then what I thought he did was really smart. They're like, "Listen, we trust you, Lee, but we don't know this kid." And his whole point he's like, "You don't have to even trust me or the kid." He's like, "Look at all the purchase orders." Like, "Do you think Texico is going to pay us or not?" And using the like the brand and the prestige and the you know the essentially the value like Texico is not going out of business. They're going to pay them pay them pay this kid that you said you don't know. Lend us against our receivables. Like that's a really good idea.

センラ#139

完璧な締めだ。本を書いてくれてありがとう。時間をありがとう。マイケル。

EN

Yeah. It was receivable based financing. The problem was that, you know, as as a as a 21-year-old, you know, starting a business with really no capital, uh, you know, in infusion from from the beginning, you know, thousand dollars, right? you know, uh, a banker looking at it with no one, uh, known inside the business to trust would sort of their their general reaction would be, I think I'll go do something else, right? Yeah. But, you know, Lee had those relationships. he was trusted and he was able to kind of explain it to them and you know that helped sort of uh break open that log jam and that you know gave us some of the capital we needed to continue to grow and expand. Yeah. So, you know, we we didn't have any capital, right? And so, uh, you know, what what we what we figured out was that if we could dramatically uh shrink um our inventory and get paid from our customers faster and, you know, uh maybe not pay our suppliers, you know, instantly, pay them a little bit later. Then if you're growing and you have a negative cash conversion cycle, you actually generate a lot of cash. And so then you don't need as much capital to raise to be able to grow the company. You have a high return on capital. So we started looking at the business that way. And of course, we also uh there was this um really interesting thing where our competitors who didn't really understand what we were doing, they had these elongated supply chains. They had distributors and dealers and so they would have, you know, like 90 days of collective inventory from the time that they actually made the the product to when it actually got to the customer. And you could actually uh understand this because if you opened up the computers, the uh chips had dates on them that showed the weeks they were made. So, you know, it would say like uh 4292 and that meant it was that chip was built in the 42nd week of the 92nd year. And so you could literally date how old the inventory was by opening these things up. But anyway, so they had like 90 days in their collective supply chain. And we figured out how to have like five days. I mean, it was crazy. It was like it was like a massive advantage. Now, the other reason this is important is because it turns out that the price of electronic components generally goes down, right? and and you know it's it's a pretty predictable thing. And so uh if our components are 5 days old and the competitor's components are 90 days old, well theirs cost a lot more than ours do, right? And so now you've got this structural competitive advantage. Now uh another element of this is that um you also have the freshest and the newest and the best technology. You're not selling the 90-day old fish or bananas, right? You're selling the the the the new chip, the the the latest capability. And so now you've got even another advantage, right? And so and then you've got this feedback loop because you're getting signal from the customers of, oh, I like this, I want that, change this. And so you're able to, you know, create this dynamic feedback loop. So that was what we created and it worked you know and we kept iterating it and evolving it. The competitors uh you know they they um kind of dismissed it and one of the best things was they they just didn't understand it. They like they like misunderstood it which was fantastic. it's like it's like you don't want them to understand what's going on. You you you don't want to explain it. now? Now now you can explain it, but back then you don't want to you don't want them to know what's happening. You just want them "I'll crush the episodes. episodes would be great." Like, because he had so many crazy stories. He without hesitation, he goes, "Absolutely not." I was like, "Why?" He goes, "I have no desire to educate my competitors." How do you think he deliberately misunder like how is that possible for him to not be able to accurately analyze? Do you think he was just dismissive of you? You didn't think you were a threat? Like what was going on there? Did you read the new biography of Jensen Wong called the Nvidia? It's actually it's a history of Nvidia but he's heavily featured NVIDIA way or I did an episode on it. I'll send it to you. Um, but he has this whole thing where the threat comes from below. And his I think he he reduces everything to maxims. He's like a really good communicator. And so his thing is like we're going to ship the whole cow because the threat goes from below. And I think I mentioned this in the episode I did on on your book where it's just like you at the time came out with a you Yeah. And you, you know, you kind of hope that they don't even see it. Right. I mean, I think there's a human instinct to to say, "Hey, look at me. I'm doing this great thing. Isn't this cool?" Right. But actually, in business, it's better if the competitor doesn't understand or doesn't see you. So, because you weren't in stores, the only way they would know that is if they were ordering directly from you. And they probably weren't doing that. Yeah. Or or if they were sort of paying attention, you know, but but you you kind of hope they don't notice and don't pay attention. There's a line in the book. I I 100% agree with you. It's like, but this is the difference between somebody that's obsessed and somebody that's not like that guy wasn't taking apart computers compulsively. There's a story in the book and no disrespect to him. I'm not trying to throw any shade to anybody. There's a story in the book where you guys are doing I think the private placement of the IPO and is Black Friday happens and I think Lee Walker walks in your office to tell you that oh … we there might be some trouble. there's trouble brewing in the capital markets at this point. And he said Michael was in his office taking apart another computer. is that there's no end to like you can't get to the end of what they're interested in. He you think he used the analogy of like a a cup like you just pour and pour and pour. It's just like it just keeps going. like they can never get to the end of their curiosity. And I think you're a perfect example of that where if you look at other founders that are doing things for fame or status or whatever the case is, it's like Jerry Seinfeld has a great line. He goes, "If you just do it for the money, you're only going to go so far." Yeah. And you're you're taking to our chips and analyzing like, "Oh, I have a 90 days advantage over here." And I'm not worried about the capital markets cuz we're just going to keep serving our customers and like eventually that is going to change. There's not going to be a depression forever. So what can I focus on? I can just focus on understanding what I'm working on, what's in front of me and then following this deep curiosity, you know, and and and actually taking the curiosity that comes from your head into like an actual product that makes somebody else's life better. It's like the miracle of entrepreneurship. Of course. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. and still caring about the company even from the grave. Um it's it's a common I think misconception. I'm curious to get your take on this where people are like well you know if you don't raise all the money at the beginning and your competitor does like you're automatically dead. And I hear that a lot and I was like I don't know like compact raised 75 h 100red million and you had $1,000 in a dorm room. Do you feel that like it is actually different today? Like if you were advising like a younger entrepreneur Yeah. uh advice there. I don't think, you know, like I was saying saying earlier, I don't think there are ever these absolutes. I think you always have to hold out the possibility that somebody is going to figure out some clever interesting way to do something that nobody's ever thought of that is different and you know, uh that's just going to happen, right? Yeah, that's actually an interesting area to go down where it's like who else you you figured out by accident like because you know uh necessity is the mother of all inventions like I don't have capital so how do I get money? Well, I just ask my customers for the money and then you you you accidentally discovered all these advantages and had a deeper understanding as you went along. Are there any other examples of like entrepreneurs or businesses that you've studied where it's like, "Wow, that's like a really clever way to do something effectively inexpensively." Well, I mean, you think about uh some of the some of the uh retailers, you know, like, you know, Walmart and Costco and Amazon obviously came up with with super clever ways of of winning in that space by uh you know, doing things inexpensively, taking out all kinds of cost. Yeah, there's that mail war thing again. really and it was sort of like as we were establishing our brand. Uh you know sort of the conventional wisdom was a mail order company which was sort of like a like an insult. Yeah. Like it's like okay it's a mail order company how did how did you beat it? just kept doing our thing, you know, and and eventually people go, "Well, I guess it's not really mail. I mean, it's internet and it's not mail order." I was like, "What? Nobody order stuff in the mail. What is it?" Yeah. Well, so we we were selling direct, right? We, you know, like people would call us on the phone and we used to have these rooms with like a gazillion fax machines and they would send us their orders on faxes. It was crazy. And they had cataloges, right? And so then uh you know the worldwide web comes along and you websites you know like oh you mean we can create a website and people can go on there and like the catalog is there and they can like press a button order the thing in my first book you notice on every page at the bottom it said www.dell.com com. Like obsessed with it just became like the uh easy way to interact with people. I think 98. Yeah. 98. I remember when you could like go to all the websites I'm done for the day. kind of it sounds crazy now, but there there there used to be not that many websites and you could like go to them and like okay, I'm done. Like it's just there's nothing nothing else to see. That obviously changed quickly. I think it was probably 9096 95 build to build had to build the whole thing. Yeah. It's it's funny. Uh I forgot about the fact that Dell.com is on the bottom of every page, but what's fascinating is if you read Bezos's shareholder letters, it's not he never refers to it as Amazon. Every single uh shareholder letter up until, you know, you don't have to do it anymore. And then every single interview it's Amazon.com, Amazon.com, Amazon.com. Then it turns into Amazon because it's just like we got to push you guys to this new thing called the internet where you can buy things. It's such a fascinating like thought like how uh novel it was. But you kind of saw it like right away like this just we should just do this cuz it's cool. We had experimented with how do you create an electronic version of the catalog even like we're going to send you a floppy disc or a CD ROM and you put it in your computer and you load it up and the catalog is there. Right. Those are some of the ridiculous things that happened before the internet before the worldwide web. Yeah. Yeah, we did. you know, you wanted to make it easy for the customer to understand your offerings and then the worldwide web just made that, you know, kind of infinitely accessible to to anyone. uh obviously for a business that was selling directly to businesses and uh you know, individuals, you know, all over the world, it was just total rocket fuel. How soon into Dell were you starting to sell like targeting institutions over individuals? Okay. So go it started with like doctors and dentists, right? Or lawyers were some of your first but they were using it for business purposes. an individual doctor or dentist, I would think of them as as as more like an individual. But uh roughly 75 to 80% of it is businesses, not consumer. And so that's kind of been the thing for a long time. Similar percentage. Yeah. you know, there were companies, universities, they were buying five, 10, 10, 20, 50 machines at a time. One final thing that I want to talk to you about that I think is like one of the most important ideas in your book, uh, especially when you're trying to like push these stories down the generations. So I like I see it in a lot of the biographies and I think it's like another misconception how we just talked about the misconception between like entrepreneurs know be wary of experts and like how they can kill new ideas where like a a normal person would revere them right so there's like this this this difference of understanding between that another one that I would say is like the importance of ego and self-belief and self-confidence and my you know general society might say you know uh you should generate evidence and then be confident. And I hear this a lot which is perplexing to me because in the books this is no you have that direct completely back backwards. Belief comes before ability. And so I would go back to this part in your book that I think is super important when you're 19 years old and your dad's like what do you want to do with your life? Like and you're like I want to compete with IBM and you sit there and like again I I don't think you should be reading these books quickly. This is like there's no test at the end. Like sit with the ideas and really think about what's happening on this page. And I think it's one of the most important pages in the book. I can actually see the page in front of me. And what you realize, you say on that that page where it's just like, was I a little full? You know, the idea is like, I have $1,000. I'm in the UT dorm room. I'm going to take on the biggest company in the world. And you said, was I a little full of myself at 19? Sure, I was. I think you have to be to do anything important. Can you explain that mindset? Yeah, I think I think it's a combination of of uh naivee, right, which is an important element. It's like you don't know enough to know that maybe this won't work. being real here, I think a perfect illustration of that would be your reluctance, initial reluctance to name the company after you because it was PC's limited right at the very beginning. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But then you realize like why don't we just do Dell? And then that's when I thought of the Osborne thing cuz you're like wait a minute this guy he named his company after that. Like there's no what if it doesn't work? Yeah. And and uh you know fear. Has that happened to you? It's perfectly said. Thank you for writing the book. Thank you for the time. I really appreciate, Michael.

デル#140

ありがとう、デイヴィッド。

---

EN

So can you explain how you stumbled upon the negative cash conversion cycle and why that was so powerful? Whoa. How is that? So I I But how how how do you expl how do you explain their inability to to maybe not even see what's going on. So I have a funny story about this and then I want to get back to Compact and IBM. So uh I had dinner with one of the wealthiest people in the world. He's 76 years old. He's been uh in the family business. He's the second generation of this privately held like dynasty and uh he started working in the business since he was six and it was like crazy stories. Uh he started on the shipping they they own one of the largest privately held shipping companies in the world and he's this rakin tour. He's like super charismatic and just like I was it was incredible dinner but I had found out same reason we were like hey I'm writing this book because I want you know people to come to Dell to understand the history. They had commissioned, the family had commissioned a a real author, right? I have some of these books at my house, not from this guy, where these family businesses or, you know, these people at broker companies, they have they'll hire, you know, an actual author, pay them whatever, a million dollars, write the book, and then they'll print it just like this, but there'll be no ISBN number on the back because it's not available for sale. So, I have a couple of these in my home library that people have given me because of the podcast. But he was telling me the story like, "Yeah, we we had we commissioned a biography of the patriarch who passed away a long time ago." And then we did one for me. And I was just like, "Dude, give me those books." I like leaned in. I was like, "I want those books." I was like, So that you you just nailed it. It's like obviously if you have an edge, shut up about it. This is what I don't understand. So maybe IBM and Compact are the two people, two main companies are not understanding the advantage that you had at this time, right? IBM is a big old stodgy company. Okay, that makes somewhat more sense. Compact was run by its founder. He's still alive. You can go ask him, you know. I I I I I you know I think I think when you're you know you're in a a bubble you know people tell you things are working and maybe you just don't want to believe that there's alternate information and so you dismiss it. I haven't read the whole thing. No beautifully described like you're just stacking one advantage on another advantage on another advantage. So like okay, we have the latest technology. We we have way better supply chain management than you. We are putting out I think you put out a computer that outperformed compacts you which you sold direct to the consumer for $795 if remember correctly. It was faster than theirs and they they sold a worst computer for $1,500 and it was only through retail stores. It's like that exact the the manifestation of all these advantages you had. You could just look at the market and be like, it's very curious to me how this founder could be like, "Hey." Yeah. I think this is tied back to the importance of following like your natural star and something you're just obsessed with because I didn't know that part where you take these things and see, oh, this is the 42nd week of the 96 year. That's insane. It's not that hard. The numbers are right there. The numbers are just sitting there. It's like they're they're they're just staring at you. They're they're they're talking to you. That's what you do. Ex. That's what you do. That's exactly I think that's the biggest thing, man. It's like it's an unfair advantage if you can direct your energy at something that you There's no We talked about this at dinner. We have a mutual friend and Sam Hinky. And one of the things that's interesting about Sam is if you analyze who he keeps around him, they're they they have different interests. You know, it's like this podcaster dude, this investor guy, this entrepreneur, this like athlete, and he's like what what what I'm drawn to, what all these people have in common that may not be obvious to you, David, Yeah. When it's like a a passion or obsession, there's there's you just there's no end to it. You got it. So we we were just talking about the fact that Compact and IBM they were almost like essentially you got fuel from being underestimated. You mentioned in the book that like you found it I think you said something that's like a powerful motivate motivating force. Do you recall why you felt that way? Yeah, it was it was just it was just like, okay, wow, this is going to be a a multiplier for us because they underestimate us. They they don't understand what we're doing and and so uh they they didn't see us coming because they were underestimating us, you know. Uh I think uh the CEO of Compact, you know, would would refer to us as a mail order company or, you know, garage operation or what whatever, you know, and you'd hear that and you'd go, "Oh, wow. This is this is great." It's like no idea what we're doing. All all that was motivating. You know, anytime, you know, there there was sort of a a setback and the conventional wisdom or even whatever interpretation was, okay, you know, they're going to fail, they're going to go out of business, all that incredibly motivating. Is it still like that today? I love how everything is of course and of course it is. Yeah, I mean if if it wasn't um I'd probably probably probably probably probably be dead. I mean I I think it's very uh situation specific in terms of the company industry etc. So I don't think you could give generic Yeah, that's why I think like the generic advice is you have to do this or you're dead. I'm like I don't I'm pretty sure that's not the case. Yeah. The other one that came to mind was um Sam Zamuri, the Banana King. uh he essentially you know builds the second largest banana empire and at the time uh then later on overtakes the first uh largest which is United Food Company. But I guess like one one thing that he figured out and he was actually your same age. He was 19 years old. He had no money and he was trying to figure out a product to sell. And so what he did, he's just like, "Well, I was working the docks down, I think, in Alabama at the time." And he's like, "All these fruit companies, they have these things called ripes, which are the bananas that are going to go bad in like 2 days from now, and they just take them off the boat and throw them in the garbage because they can't get it fast enough to the store." And his idea is like, well, I can use this new technology today, which is the the railroad, and I can buy this for almost nothing because they're not getting anything anyways, and I'm going to put their ripes and get on the railroad with it, and then sell it at every single stop. And then he was generating so much cash, and then he could start working down the line all the way to when he had his own banana plantations. Just like that idea, it's like it starts out with like this little nugget of like, oh, this is like an interesting opportunity. And now understanding as you pull and pull and pull and pull, it gets more and more like you're you keep stacking these advantages. on uh one on top of another. Um, yeah. I got to find I should organize and like look into like more examples of like is there another example of like what you had at the beginning of Dell because I think that's the key like I think some degree it's like the easier more path is just go and like sell part of the company or raise more money or or find essentially like solve the problem with money where you solved it with like creativity and hustle and like intelligence. Uh those those ideas are like excessively fascinating to me. IKEA is another one where he you know same thing where he was just selling mail order. He's a mail order company. Um and he has a great line in I know. I think it's like still still uh he has that great line where he's like expensive solutions to any problem are signs of mediocrity. So he was like you have to be more creative. We had this whole thing in in the 80s and we called it beat the mail order stigma porative and and it's sort of like a stereotype. It's like, oh, you can dismiss it because it's a mail order company, right? And all the press, you know, for years they were like, mail order company Dell, you know, mailware company Dell introduces server, you know, like what what like it's like, okay, we have 30,000 patents. When are we not a mail order company? Like, what is this mail order thing? It's like So, so anyway, we had to like get rid of that. So, I think you just made me realize something um that I didn't understand when I read the book when you were talking about how important it is to like not squash ideas and that, you know, ideas can come from anywhere and they can like, you know, they they seem small, but they can have huge impact. I think Dell was like one of the first companies to sell on the internet, right? that's the coolest thing ever. We got to do that right and so I read that other book, too. getting people to the website because And that book came out in '97, right? 99 Um but yeah, we started we started, you know, with with with one of the first websites. I mean, there are there weren't many websites. I I remember when it was a small number. like in the whole world. Like there's no more websites. Like So how the hell do you even build a store? Like you were collecting do they have to like call a number in? Because I remember like taking credit cards online. Well, maybe not 90 if you were doing Do you remember what year you launched the site? 97 probably 96. Okay. Yeah. Did you sh that? So you just kind of like what a remember AOL? They just like essentially carpet bomb the entire country. Yeah, we didn't do it like that, but but we ours is more targeted, but The idea of mailing out a floppy or a disc of a catalog is just like a hilarious idea. But then people were were surprised when people started ordering computers online. And I I I remember, you know, we sold like a server for $50,000 online. People were like, "No way." You know, it's like it didn't happen as fast as as some of the things that are happening now. Yeah. But You know, it's really interesting if you go back to the very very beginning like the first full year like over 80% of the business was to businesses. uh well, first of all, let's just level set here. So if you look at all technology spending, So within the first year, you got to same similar percentages. Okay, and confidence. Um, but you know, you never sort of want to go over into the arrogant zone because that's really, I think, a dangerous place to be. So it's like okay uh I have not been in this industry for a long time and so uh you know all these reasons why it won't work are unknown to me. Okay, so that's the naive part, right? Um, and that can actually be sometimes a good thing, right? Because you're not sort of bound by those conventional thinking uh that that that maybe you're no longer as relevant or maybe you come up with some clever new way of doing it. And then, you know, the confidence piece is, all right, I'm gonna go make it work. I'm gonna go figure it out, right? Um, but you know, there's always that little voice in your head. It's like, well, what if it doesn't work? And, you know, what about this? What about this? And so, you you you know, you never want to sort of assume, okay, this is absolutely going to work no matter what because then you're going to ignore those little voices about, well, what about this? What about this? So, so, so yeah, it's sort of I think a combination of naive confidence. It it was it was it was officially Dell Computer Corporation doing business as PCs Limited, right? Yeah. What? But but it's interesting because you just said it's like yeah I have a lot of confidence I'm going to do this but the doubt never goes away. Thank you. That's actually the last thing I want to talk to you about. when we one of the first things when when we saw each other last month, we talked about we were like walking around uh Zach's office and I don't know how it came up but it came up almost immediately and it wasn't a surprise to me cuz I feel the exact same way but the fear of failure in my experience from studying all these history entrepreneurs but I think you said the same is just like the fear of failure to this day is a bigger motivator than like the love of success. Yeah, totally 100%. Uh yeah, you you know, you don't you don't want to fail. Although failing is is how you learn. uh you know pain is the best teacher and and so you you know you have to have some some little failures along the way but that that fear of uh you know you can't have it paralyze you where you you don't want to make any decisions because you're afraid to fail. Not really. No, I I you know, um you know, what you want to do is is is sort of be incremental. And again, it's back to iterating. It's like, okay, uh we're not sure if this is a good idea. Let's try it, right? Let's let's experiment. Let's get started. We'll figure it out. And we're not, you know, betting the whole company on this decision. We're just experimenting. And if it doesn't work, great. We learn something, we move on. Thank you, David. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast, founders, for almost a decade. I've obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs, searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

FAQ

A. 英語原文・自動字幕について
なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは?

このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。 公式サイト(davidsenra.com)にはエピソード要約・ショーノートはありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは前提にしていません。 参照: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WSsLSq40Yw / https://www.davidsenra.com

自動字幕の精度はどれくらい? どこが壊れやすい?

一般に YouTube 自動字幕の精度は条件で大きく変わります。 - 条件が良いと 85–95% 前後まで上がる例もある - アクセント・早口・専門用語・固有名詞・複数話者 で一気に落ちる このエピソードはインタビュー(2人会話)で比較的クリアですが、企業名・人名(Compaq / Osborne / Texaco 等)やオペレーション用語が多く、名前の誤変換が起きやすいタイプです。

この記事の英語で実際に見つかった/起きやすい誤変換は?

自動字幕原文に出やすい典型例です(日本語本文側では多くを修正済み)。

| 字幕に出た/出やすい表記 | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | Compact | Compaq(コンパック。HP に買収された PC メーカー) | | Texico | Texaco(テキサコ。大口顧客の例として語られる) | | AS6 | ASIC(Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) | | Charlie Mer | Charlie Munger(チャーリー・マンガー) | | Sam Walt | Sam Walton(ウォルマート創業者) | | Sam Zamuri | Sam Zemurray(バナナ王。United Fruit 関連の伝記で知られる) | | Sam Hinky | 共通の知人(字幕ゆれ。人物同定は断定しない) | | PC's limited / PCs Limited | PCs Limited(初期の商号) | | mailware / mail war | mail order | | porative | pejorative(蔑称) | | sendora / enra | senra(スポンサースラッグの崩れ) | | Chat GPT | ChatGPT |

つまり英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、学習用の対照テキストとしては有用でも、引用の一次ソースとしては動画そのものを優先してください。

日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している?

完全対応ではありません。 - 日本語は読みやすさのため発言をまとめ・整文している - 英語は自動字幕の切れ目が多く、発言数が日本語より細かい場合がある - ページでは話者(センラ/デル)を手がかりに、順番で英語を紐づけている そのため「この日本語のこの1文 = この英語のこの1文」とは限らず、だいたい同じ話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。

上部トグル(英語原文 / 少し大きく)は何のため?

- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け。英語は約9.5pxの補助情報 - 英語を少し大きく … 約11px前後。対照しながら精読したいとき用 英語をメインにすると誤変換に引きずられやすいので、デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」にしています。

スポンサー部分は?

本文から省略しています。音声上は Ramp / HubSpot / Function 等の読み上げが入っています。番組エンディングの Founders 案内も本文では省略しています。

B. 人物・会社・固有名詞
Michael Dell / Dell Technologies とは?

Michael Dell(マイケル・デル)Dell Technologies の創業者・CEO。テキサス大学の寮から直販 PC 事業を始め、40年以上にわたり事業を率いる。エピソード時点の語りでは「Dell を41年」「執念は11〜12歳から」と整理されている。 非公開化、EMCVMware の買収などを経た経緯は自伝でも大きな章。本編の数字・時期は話者の口頭ベースで、IR と完全一致する保証はありません。

David Senra(センラ)とは?

起業家伝記を扱う Founders ポッドキャストで知られるホスト。本番組 David Senra Show では創業者インタビューを行う。多くのゲストが Founders 経由で彼を知った、とエンディングでも述べている。

自伝・Founders 回との関係は?

センラは事前にデルの自伝を読み、Founders でデルの回も制作している。本編はその延長の対面インタビュー。社内文化の伝達・ストーリーテリングの価値(Spotify の社内史ポッドキャスト、ダイソンの店頭ストーリー等)が繰り返し語られる。

Zach Dell / Dad Terminal とは?

Zach(ザック) はマイケルの息子。自身の事業を動かしており、父に「朝5時に電話してアイデアを話す」などと描写される。 Dad Terminal はザックの呼び名。Bloomberg 端末のように、質問を投げると高度な答えが返る「父」へのログイン、という比喩。最後のクエリ例として サプライチェーン が挙がる。

Lee Walker(リー・ウォーカー)とは?

初期 Dell で重要な役割を果たした人物。デルが約21歳、リーが約45歳のときに口説き落とした、と本編で語られる。クレジットライン、オペレーション整理、プライベートプレースメント/上場への道筋、売掛ベースの銀行交渉(大口顧客の発注書を根拠にする)などを助けた、という回想。 彼が語る「マイケルは自分に自然な事業を作った/タップダンスして出社する」描写も本編で引用される。

負のキャッシュ・コンバージョン・サイクルとは?

在庫を極小化し、顧客から速く回収し、仕入先への支払いを相対的に遅らせることで、成長しながら現金を生む構造。本編では競合の集合在庫が約90日、Dell 側が約5日、という対比が出る。 部品価格が時間とともに下がる業界では、在庫が新しいほど原価が安く、最新技術を売れる、という構造的優位にもつながる、と説明される。 チップの製造週コード(例: 4292=92年第42週)を開けて読み、在庫の古さを測った、という逸話は本編のハイライト。

Compaq(コンパック)と「メールオーダー」スティグマ

字幕では Compact と誤ることが多いが、文脈上の競合は Compaq。創業者が経営していた時期の話として、Dell を「メールオーダー/ガレージ」と呼び捨てた、という回想。 Dell 側は80年代に 「beat the mail order stigma」(メールオーダーの烙印を破れ)と社内で取り組み、直販→インターネット販売へ進化した、と語られる。 スポンサー読みの中で出るオペコスト比率(Compaq 36% of revenue vs Dell 18% 等)はセンラのナレーション/自伝要約ベースで、厳密な会計定義は一次資料を当たること。

Osborne effect(オズボーン効果)とは?

Adam Osborne の Osborne Computer に由来する逸話。現行より良い次期製品を大々的に予告し、出荷が遅れると現行が売れなくなり資金繰りが死ぬ現象。本編では「小さくミスし、速く直せ」「誰もやったことのないミスをしろ」への導入として語られる。

「5年後の新しい競合」発言と AI

ChatGPT 登場(2022年11月頃)を受け、LLM の改善曲線から「エージェント/マルチエージェントが知識労働を変える」と見立て、自社がその高速・高効率な会社に変身すると全社に宣言した、という話。 具体例としてサポート向け Next Best Action(テレメトリ・保証・通話ログ・ナレッジ・Jira 等を統合し最少ステップで解く)が挙がる。ソフト開発のコーディングアシスタント、セールスツールにも展開、と説明。

技術の波を「6〜7回」乗りこなした、とは?

PC/マイクロコンピュータ、クライアントサーバ、インターネット等、数十年の技術転換を Dell が何度も再発明してきた、という口頭カウント。厳密な年表ではなく、変化の時間軸が縮んでいる(ネット普及に約10年かかったものが今は5〜10倍速い)という主張が本筋。

PCs Limited / 社名と自己確信

当初は Dell Computer CorporationPCs Limited の商号で事業。のちに Dell ブランドへ。 19歳で「IBM と競争する」と言う自己確信について、デル本人は ナイーブさ(失敗理由をまだ知らない)+自信 であり、傲慢ゾーンは危険、頭の中の「もしダメなら」の声は消さない、と整理する。

失敗への恐怖

成功への愛より、失敗への恐怖の方が動機として大きい(いまも)、と双方が同意。ただし恐怖で麻痺せず、会社を賭けない実験の反復で進める、が締めの実践知。

その他の固有名詞(短く)

- Ken Griffin … Citadel。幼少期からの執念の話、Hardball 推薦など。 - Hardball … コストを徹底的に見ろ、というオペレーター本(スポンサー橋渡しで引用)。 - Rice University … ヒューストン。子供向け夏期講座の話の舞台。 - IBM PC / Apple II … 分解して部品とマージンを理解した原体験。 - James Dyson … 5127プロトタイプ、店頭200語ストーリー、エディソニアン設計。 - Henry Ford … 専門家で競合を埋めよ、という自伝の一節(センラ談)。 - Andrew Carnegie … ベッセマー法・技術投資・競合が採用しなかった話(センラ談)。 - IKEA / Walmart / Costco / Amazon … 安く賢く勝つ小売の例。 - Steve Jobs / Bill Gates … デルが15歳前後に「10歳上の先例」として見た人物。 - Sydney Harman … Harman Kardon。「創業者は会社の魂の守護者」。

C. 数字・口頭ベースの注意

年商と口座残高、在庫日数、特許件数、調達額、オペコスト比率などは会話上の概数です。投資・学術引用には Dell の公式開示・信頼できる二次資料を優先してください。