David Senra · JA + tiny EN

「人生の仕事」を見つける——リック・ルービン

Rick Rubin on Finding Your Life’s Work

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラルービン
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

5年前、君の伝記を読んだ。『In the Studio』だ。収録前にも話してたけど、その本でいちばん好きな考えのひとつで、たぶん毎週のように思い出すのが、「Less is more——少ないほど豊か」というコンセプトだ。でも、少なくするには、まず多くやらなければならない。少し話してくれる?

EN

Five years ago I read this biography of you. It's called In the Studio. You and I were just talking about it before we started recording. One of my favorite ideas that I took away from that book that I think about probably every week is this concept that you have that less is more. But to get less you have to do more. Can you talk a little bit about that?

ルービン#2

うん。いろんなものを積み重ねていくと、ひとつひとつの重要度が下がる。10個あれば、それぞれは単独のときの10分の1の重みになる。

何かを作っていて、関わる要素を最小限にしたいなら、その要素は本当に厳しくキュレートしないといけない。全部の仕事を担い、隠れるものがないからだ。だから「少なくする」は聞こえるほど簡単じゃない。でもできたとき、人格が透けて見える。

ギターで例えると、録音ではギタリストが弾いて、それをダブル、トリプルして壁のようなギターにするやり方が多い。壁のギターだと、「ギター」は聞こえるけど、「誰かがギターを弾いている」は聞こえない。ただのギターになって、もっとジェネリックになる。ひとりが弾いて、弦に触れる指が聞こえると、人格が出る。もっと人間的になる。僕が探すのは、その特異で本質的なものが透けてくる瞬間だ。

---

EN

Yeah. Um if you're stacking a lot of things on top of each other each one of those things becomes less important. So if you have 10 things each one of them is 1/10 as important as one by itself. So if you're making something and you want the least amount involved, those things have to be really critically curated because they're doing the work of everything and nothing is hidden. It's why it's not as easy as it sounds to to do less. But it it when you see it you can get the personality. I'll give you an example with guitars. If you a lot of recordings are made where a guitarist plays and then they double it and triple it and they create this like wall of guitars. And when you when there's a wall of guitars, you hear guitar but you don't hear someone playing guitar. You just hear guitar. It becomes more generic. When one person plays it and you can hear their fingers on the strings it's got more personality. It's more human. And I tend to look for those things where it's the the singular essence shows through.

センラ#3

外から見ると、すごいものを作る人たちの、完成品が届く前の「量」にはいつも驚かされる。君は10代で音楽に取り憑かれて、18歳くらいで寮の部屋からDef Jamを始めた。最初の例はLL Cool Jだった? 偉大な作品・アルバムの裏に、自分が想像したよりずっと多い仕事がある——と気づいた最初の瞬間は?

EN

What I'm always surprised about people that do great things, I think especially for people on the outside, uh it's like the amount of volume that goes into it before like before you're presented with like their finished work. I I know like you start, you know, you're obsessed with music when you're a teenager. You start Def Jam in your dorm room, you're like 18 years old. What What was the first example? Was it LL Cool J? Like who was the first example where you're like, "Wow, there's a lot more work that goes into making a great piece of art, great product, great album than I ever knew."

ルービン#4

考えたことがなかった。ミッションで、愛だった。仕事だとも思っていなかった。ただ作りたいものを作っていた。大変なこと自体は、そもそも考量に入っていなかった。

EN

I never thought about it because this was uh it was like a mission and a love and I didn't think of it even as work. It was just what I wanted to do is make these things. So, the fact that it took a lot of work wasn't It wasn't even in um it wasn't in consideration at all.

センラ#5

18、19歳の頃は、ずっと音楽だけだった?

EN

When you were 18 years old, 19 years old, it was just all music all the time?

ルービン#6

うん。ファンとしてずっと聴いて、恋に落ちて、どんな形でも関わりたかった。ニューヨークでヒップホップが始まったばかりで、完全にアンダーグラウンドだった。聴ける場所は、通っていた学校の近くのダウンタウンのクラブが、週に一度だけ。それ以外はブロンクスやブルックリンのコミュニティセンターや野外パーティー。ストリートミュージックで、評価もされていなかった。

毎週そのクラブに通った。当時出ていたヒップホップは12インチのシングルだけで、アルバムはなくて、2〜3週間に1枚くらい。クラブで聴いて、出てくるシングルを買った。でもシングルはクラブのエネルギーを写していなかった。クラブのエネルギーをレコードに残したくて、最初に作ったのが『It's Yours』。クラブのエネルギーを捕まえようとしただけだ。録音のことも知らない、プロでもない子供だった。知らないからこそ、ヒップホップに忠実でいられた。

当時の少ないシングルは、別ジャンルを作っていたプロが作っていた。ヒップホップの人間じゃない。経験のある外の人が、「ヒップホップってこうだろう」と思って作っていた。クラブに行けば本当の姿がわかる。クラブは極端に削ぎ落とされていて、スクラッチ、ブレイクビーツ、ドラムマシン、ラップ。それが本物のレコードだった。

EN

Yeah, it's just um as a fan I listen to music all the time. I fell in love with it. I wanted to be involved in whatever way that I could. Uh hip-hop was just starting in New York City. It was still a totally underground movement. So, the only place you could hear it was at one club downtown where I where I was going to school. Um there was only one club that you could hear hip-hop and that was once a week. But other than that, it was only in It was in the Bronx. It was in Brooklyn. But really just in like community centers and outdoor parties. It was underground and not well thought of kind of music. It was street music. And um and I would go to this club every week and hear the music. And at that time there would be a few hip-hop records coming out, 12-in No albums, only 12-in singles. And um there'd be maybe one new record every two or three weeks. And that's all there was. And I would so go to the club every week, hear the music there, and then I would buy the one single that would come out every few weeks. And the singles didn't represent what the energy in the club was. And I wanted to feel that energy in the club. So, I started the first record I made was called It's Yours. And the purpose of that was I was just trying to capture the energy of the club on record. And I didn't know anything about recording. I wasn't a professional. Yeah, I was a kid. The fact that I didn't know what I was doing allowed it to be true to what hip hop was. Whereas, all of the records that were coming out, the few and far between, 12-in singles every few weeks, they were made by professionals who made other kinds of music. They weren't made by hip hop people. And so, an outsider with experience was making what they thought hip hop was. But if you went to the club, you knew what it really was. And the club was in very stripped down, and it was scratching, break beats, drum machines, and rapping. And that's what the records were.

センラ#7

別ジャンルのプロが作ったものは、磨かれすぎて偽っぽかった? クラブで聴いていたものとの違いは?

EN

The ones that were produced by people producing other or making other genres of music, was it like too much polish to it? Was it like fake? How would you describe the difference between what you're hearing in the club? So, this is like your opportunity, essentially, your way into this.

ルービン#8

レコードは、当時のシーンのドキュメンタリーみたいなものだ。他の記録はシーンを代表していなくて、別の何かを代表していた。プロのハリウッド版。でも本物はそうじゃなかった。

EN

The records are like a documentary of the scene that was going on. And all of the other documents of that period weren't representative of the scene. They were representative of something else. So, profession the professional like the Hollywood version of it. But that's not what it was.

センラ#9

それが最初のシングルで、18か月で10万枚くらい売れたやつ?

EN

Is this the the first um like single that you put out? It sold like 100,000 copies. Is that the same one?

ルービン#10

だいたいそう。あの世界ではたくさん売れた。18か月くらいかけて10万枚。ラジオに載ることもなく、誰も聴かない・好きにもされない音楽のなかではヒットだった。当時、ヒップホップファン以外は音楽として認めない人の方が多いくらいだった。

EN

Yeah, something like that. It sold a lot I mean, for for a record in that world, it took a long time. Probably took 18 months to sell 100,000, but over 18 months sold about 100,000, and it was a hit as much of a hit could be in something that would never be on the radio and and a kind of music that nobody listened to or liked. As a matter of fact, back then, most people who were not hip hop fans didn't even acknowledge it as music. That's how far it was.

センラ#11

じゃあ何だと思われてたの?

EN

What did they think it was?

ルービン#12

わからない。エルヴィスやロックンロールと同じで、大人は音楽として認めなかった。何かわからない別のものだった。それくらい異物だった。

---

EN

Don't know. It was the same thing though with Elvis and rock and roll. Like the grown-ups didn't acknowledge that as music. It was just some other thing that they didn't know what it was.

センラ#13

18、19の頃から、すでに古い音楽を遡って研究していた?

EN

Okay, that's

ルービン#14

好きになった人の音楽は、その人が好きだったものまで全部聴きたかった。理解したかった。

EN

That's how foreign it was.

センラ#15

伝記でも同じことをする。スティーブ・ジョブズが面白いと思って伝記を読むと、そこに出てくる十人くらいの名前が気になって、参考文献から彼らを刺激した人の本を辿る。

EN

When you were 18, 19 years old, were you already studying older versions of music? Did you you already going back?

ルービン#16

同じ。

EN

I always listen anything I liked I wanted to hear everything that the person that I liked everything they listened to that they liked. I was wanted to understand.

センラ#17

初めてそれをやったのは、どのバンド・アーティストだった?

EN

I do the same thing with biographies. Yeah. So, I want to know more more about this, but uh I'll find somebody that you know, like Steve Jobs for example. I find him very interesting. I'd read a biography of him. And then every single one of these books they'll talk about like half a dozen, maybe a dozen people. And I'm like, "Who's that? I don't know this guy." And I'll go in the bibliography and usually find books about the their inspi- the people that inspired them.

ルービン#18

いつもそうだった。あるいは初めて聴いた瞬間から。MC5——1960年代デトロイトの、パンクロック以前のプロトパンク——を初めて聴いて、すごくよかった。中古レコード店に行った。古いクールなものが揃っていて、店員がいちばん詳しい。クエンティン・タランティーノがビデオ店で働いていた話と同じで、本当に愛している人のまわりには情報が詰まっている。

「MC5が好きなら、イギーとストゥージズも」と言われて聴いたら、また好きになった。同じデトロイト、同じ時代、同じシーン。自分が好きになった音楽と、その音楽を刺激した音楽——両方をずっと追っていた。

---

EN

Same.

センラ#19

動機を知りたい。なぜその道に入ったか。君は音楽は趣味で、本業は別の仕事になると思ってたよね。

EN

Do you remember the first time you did that? Like who were you like, "I'm really interested in this band or this artist. Let me find out who they were inspired by."

ルービン#20

うん。仕事になるなんて不可能だと思っていた。音楽を職業にしている人を知らなかったし、想像もできなかった。家族にアーティストはいなかった。現実的な期待じゃなかった。だから音楽はこれまで通り愛して、参加も作るのもできる。でも自分を支える仕事は別にある——音楽で生活が支えられるとは思っていなかった。

EN

It's always been the case or the other version of it is um it's like it where I would hear something for the first time. I can remember the first time I heard the MC5. Which was uh a band from Detroit in the 1960s. Kind of a proto punk rock band. They're before punk rock, but it's has punk energy. And I heard that and it was really cool. And then I remember going to a uh used record store because the used record store had all the cool older stuff and they knew the most about music. So, you spend hours in used record stores and just talking to the people who work there. Same like um you heard Quentin Tarantino working in a video shop and just there's so much information around the people who really love this thing. Um and I remember they said, "Well, if you like the MC5, you might want to check out Iggy and the Stooges." And then I listened to the Stooges. I go, "I love this, too." And that was another also, Detroit, same time frame, same scene, and it was great music. Um, so it would either be music like the music that I found that I liked, or music that inspired the music that I liked. Both of those were things I would always pursue.

センラ#21

バンドにいたよね。ギター?

EN

I want to tell you about the presenting sponsor of this podcast, Ramp. I have been reading a lot about SpaceX lately, and SpaceX is one of the most valuable private businesses [music] in the world, and one of the main themes in the history of SpaceX is constantly attacking and questioning your cost. Ramp helps many of the most innovative businesses in the world do exactly [music] that. The median company running on Ramp cuts their expenses by 5%, and one thing SpaceX has demonstrated is that a religious dedication to controlling costs can help actually increase [music] revenue because you can pursue opportunities you couldn't otherwise, and we see that in the Ramp data, too. The median company running on Ramp also grows their revenue by 16%. So, when you're running your business on Ramp and your competitors are not, you have a massive competitive advantage that compounds [music] over time. Ramp is the only platform designed to make your finance team faster and happier. Many of the top [music] founders and CEOs I know run their business on Ramp. I run my business on Ramp, and you should, [music] too. Go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time, save money, and grow revenue. That is ramp.com.

ルービン#22

ギター。パンクロックバンドだから、すごく初歩的だった。あとDJも。

EN

I always think like the motivations, I always want to know why people are doing what they're doing. I think the motivations of what they're doing, the reason they they go into their like chosen profession is really important. You thought music was going to be like a hobby, like you were going to have to get a day job.

センラ#23

どうやって今のこの特異なポジションまで来たのか、道筋を説明してくれる?

EN

Yeah. I think it was impossible to be a job.

ルービン#24

そのとき興味があるものに従ってきただけだ。最初はヘヴィメタル——当時は今のヘヴィメタルというよりハードロックで、エアロスミス、AC/DC、テッド・ニュージェントみたいなアリーナ・ロック。13、14歳でそれが大好きでギターを手にしたが、うまくいかなかった。パンクが来ると、もっと基本的な音楽だったから一緒に弾きやすかった。

EN

Yeah, can you talk about that?

センラ#25

そこからDJが次の入り口?

EN

Yeah, I thought I would have a regular job. I didn't I didn't know anyone who did music professionally, or I couldn't imagine it. I didn't have any I no one in my family was an artist. Uh, so it wasn't a realistic expectation. So, I thought I'd love music the way I always have. I could participate and make music if I want, but I would have a job to support myself cuz I didn't think that that was possible to for music to support my life.

ルービン#26

次は高校でのヒップホップへの関心。高校でパンクを好きなのは僕だけだったけど、ヒップホップを好きな子は何人かいた。まだ本当に最初期だった。

EN

You were in a band, right?

センラ#27

それは控えめな表現だね。Def Jamの創業の話を読んでいると、本の中で何年かを書き出して、リックが何歳かを確認する。ジェイ・Zの『Decoded』を読んだあとだった。君がDef Jamを始めてから10年後、ジェイ・Zは「ヒップホップで金持ちになるとは言えなかった。でも消える前にもっと大きくなるとはわかっていた」と言っている。それは君の時点から10年後だ。

EN

Mhm.

ルービン#28

僕の時点では、「大きくなる」とは絶対言わなかった。これを作る、好きな少数が好きになる、それだけ。アップサイドは考えていなかった。誰か他の人が好きになるとも思っていなかった。それくらい地下だった。

EN

You played I think guitar.

センラ#29

LL Cool Jが最初にプロデュースした人?

EN

Guitar.

ルービン#30

最初にプロデュースしたヒップホップはT・ラ・ロックの『It's Yours』。シングル1枚。その次がLLの最初のレコード。

EN

In a punk rock band, so it's very rudimentary.

センラ#31

スリーブに「Reduced by Rick Rubin」と書いて、寮の住所を載せたのはどれ?

EN

Yeah, and then DJ. I'm still a little confused. Can you like try to explain the path that led you to this very singular position that you that you have now?

ルービン#32

たぶん全部に寮の住所があった。住んでた場所だから。「Reduced by」はたぶんLLのレコードで初めて書いた。

EN

Yeah, I just always followed what was interesting to me at the time. So, when punk rock came along, well, first punk rock would be heavy metal. Heavy metal at that time was really more like hard rock than what we think of now as heavy metal. So, it would be Aerosmith, AC/DC, Ted Nugent. Those were kind of the mainstays of what arena rock was like when I was 13 or 14 years old. And I loved that music, and then I got a guitar and tried to play along, and it didn't it didn't go well. But then when punk rock came along, I could it was easier for me to play along because it was more basic music.

センラ#33

それがいちばん惹かれるところだ。「少なくするには多くやる」。削ぎ落とすことへの、宗教的なほどの献身。18、19歳でそれをレコードに書いた。

EN

But how do you go from that to is DJ the next route in?

ルービン#34

「Produced by」という言葉を考えて、それは「積み上げる」意味だと思った。プロダクションは構築だ。でも僕がやっていたのは分解と削減だった。「Reduced by」の方が正確かも、と思ってそうした。

EN

Uh the next thing that happened was in in my interest in hip hop in high school, there were some kids No No one in my high school liked punk rock except me, but there were some kids who liked hip hop, and this was in again in the very very very early days of hip hop.

センラ#35

彼が曲を持ってきて、君が何かを削る——どうやって?

EN

I think that's an understatement. I mean, the beginning of hip hop cuz I remember reading uh about the early um founding of Def Jam.

ルービン#36

当時は曲じゃなかった。歌詞のノートが何冊もあって、曲の順番もなく、ただのライムだった。一緒に見て、「ここから曲の核になるものがあるか」と言う。たとえば「I Need a Beat」は繰り返しのフレーズになってフックになる。Def Jam以前のヒップホップは、ラップし始めて数分ラップして終わる。曲というより独白に近かった。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#37

ビートに乗ったスポークンワードみたい?

EN

And then I was I was like when I'm reading books, I like write out the year that I'm in, and then I look up what year that person was born. So, I'm like, "Okay, how old is Rick at this point that's happening in his life?" And what was what I remarkable is like when I was reading your book, I had read This is after I read Jay-Z's book, Decoded.

ルービン#38

ラップのスタイルだけど、曲の構造じゃなくて、ジャマイカのトースティングに近い。僕はビートルズで育って、音楽の理解はビートルズが土台だ。ビートルズは史上最高のソングライターで、曲の構造は整理されて締まっている。その知識をラップに当てはめて、独白やトースティングではなくビートルズの曲のように構造化した。

---

EN

Mhm.

センラ#39

LL Cool Jと仕事をしてから40年。今のアーティストとの仕事は、当時とどれくらい似ていて、どれくらい違う?

EN

And Jay-Z, 10 years after you're starting Def Jam, is talking about the early days of hip-hop when he got into it, which is a decade after you got into it. And he says something that's really great. He's just like, "I definitely couldn't tell you that I was going to I could get rich from rap."

ルービン#40

たぶんあまり変わらない。アーティスト次第だ。LLはソロのラッパーで、バンドもトラックも持っていなかったから、トラックを作るのは僕の責任で、とても削ぎ落としたミニマルなものだった。今は大きなサウンドのバンドと仕事することもある。でも探しているのは、それぞれのアーティストの本質で、本質はたいてい削ぎ落とされたものだ——彼ら自身にまで。

ついこのあいだThe Strokesの新作を終えた。5人のバンドだから、5人のバンドに聞こえる。それ以下には聞こえない。彼らそのものに聞こえる。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#41

「Ruthless edit(容赦ない編集)」について何度かポッドキャストで話しているよね。説明して。

EN

I just knew that hip-hop was going to get a lot bigger before it goes away.

ルービン#42

作品全体のために、本当に好きな部分を取り除くことがプロセスの一部になる。100%あって、最後に70%にしたい——30%多すぎる——とき、30を削って70に持っていくのではなく、まず40%まで強制的に落とす。それから必要なものを足して70に戻す。そうすると働き方が違う。容赦ない編集のあとの方が作品をよく理解できる。

特にグループだと、みんな投票する。レッド・ホット・チリ・ペッパーズなら、1枚のアルバムに40〜50曲録って、全員がA・B・Cで投票する。全員がAならアルバムに入る。意見が割れたら入らないかもしれない。民主的に、「全員が一緒にこれが最高だと思うもの」まで落とす。それが容赦ない編集だ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#43

50曲録って、アルバムは10〜12曲。生きていけない3曲みたいなものがある?

EN

That's a decade later than where you're at.

ルービン#44

「これなしでは生きられない」曲まで一度辿り着いて、そこから外に広げるのが助けになる。どんなに少なくても。

---

EN

And where I was, I would not have said it'll ever get big. I was in the stage where I'm going to make this, and the few people who like this will all like it, and that's it. There was no upside. There was no thinking anybody else is going to like this. That's how underground it was.

センラ#45

音楽以外の関心は? 建築とか、別ドメインで似た考え方で美しいものを作っている人は?

EN

Is LL Cool J the first person you produced?

ルービン#46

どのドメインにも、美しいものを作る人はいる。そういう人が好きだ。

EN

The first hip-hop record I produced was T La Rock, It's Yours.

センラ#47

思考プロセスにも似たものを感じる?

EN

Okay.

ルービン#48

全部同じだと思う。僕がやっていることの大半は、実は音楽についてじゃない。たまたま音楽で働いているだけで、音楽についてじゃない。通じる?

EN

It was one single.

センラ#49

通じる。もう少し。

EN

That's the one that sold 100,000 copies in 18 months.

ルービン#50

シャングリラに来て空間を歩くと、他の場所とは違う感じがするよね。レコードを作るとき、関わるもの、好きなもの、買うオブジェクトと同じ美意識がある。全部ひとつの世界観に収まっている。

EN

LL's first record was the first record after that.

センラ#51

わかる。収録前にもポッドキャストの話をした。最初のポッドキャストは10年以上、ビジネスを作った人の伝記を読むだけだった。でも時間とともに、アーティスト、起業家、映画監督、ミュージシャン——同じ人格タイプだと気づいた。区別がない。

EN

But which is the one where you put "Reduced by Rick Rubin" on the sleeve, and then your your dorm room address?

ルービン#52

同じだ。創造的精神だ。

---

EN

Yeah. I think all of them probably had the dorm room address, cuz that's where I lived. And "Reduced by" I probably said it for the first time on LL's record.

センラ#53

わがままな話をいくつかしたい。ヒップホップで育って、今でもほぼそれしか聴かない——今は音楽よりポッドキャストが多いけど。潜在意識にあった感覚に言葉をくれた。エミネムの最初のアルバムを聴いて、「これが自分の感じ方だ」と思った。ミシガンのトレーラーパークで育ったわけじゃないけど、家族や成長の話のいくつかはわかる。

君が「今まで一緒に仕事したなかで最も執着的なアーティストかもしれない」と言ったのをスクリーンショットして、いつも見ている。なぜそう言った? 彼と仕事をするのはどんな感じ?

EN

This is the thing I like fascinated with. It's like this less is more, but to get less you have to do more. This stripping away of everything that's just like almost like religious devotion to simplicity and like timeless ideas. You were 19, 18 years old when put that on his record.

ルービン#54

人生全体が言葉を書くことに中心がある感じだ。完全にそれに取り憑かれている。いつもノートを持って、すごく小さい字でメモを取り続けている。ノートが何冊もあって、「新しい曲を書いてるの?」と聞いたら、「いや、スキルを活性状態に保ってるだけ」と言った。その90%は曲には入らない、と。ただ書いている。それが彼のすることだ。書くこと。

EN

Well, I thought about the idea of produced by, and I thought the word meant to build up. Like I I think of production as building. And really what I was doing was taking apart and reducing. I thought maybe reducing would be "Reduced by" is more accurate in this case, and that's that's how it happened.

センラ#55

曲作りの他の要素にも同じ執着は? 自分でプロダクションもやるよね。

EN

So, he brings you a song, and you there's just two Like can what do you what do you take away?

ルービン#56

やる。同じ種類の執着だと思う。それが彼を偉大にしている。執着している。

EN

days it weren't he didn't did it weren't songs. It would be um he would just have notebooks of lyrics. And they weren't in song order. It was just rhymes. And um we would look at all the lyrics together and say is there something here that could be the basis of a song like I need a beat for example. That could be a repeated phrase that ends up being a hook. And and the reason like many of the hip hop records before the Def Jam records were somebody would start rapping and then they would rap for a few minutes and then they would finish rapping. It wasn't like a song. It was more like a monologue.

センラ#57

執着していないのに偉大だと感じた人はいる?

EN

Almost like spoken word to beat?

ルービン#58

いると思う。それだけが道じゃない。自然にもっと流れで来る人もいる。労働倫理はいつも一部だけど、それが理由でそうである人もいれば、圧倒的に才能があって、ゴールまで届くだけの労働倫理がある人もいる。

EN

Kind of but but it was still in a rap style but it wasn't in a song structure. It was like Jamaican toasting. But the fact that I grew up on the Beatles and loved the Beatles and my understanding of music is based on the Beatles. And the Beatles were the greatest songwriters ever. And the structure of their songs are really um organized and tight. So based on what I knew about lit from listening to the Beatles, I applied that to rap music so that it would be structured more like a Beatles song instead of like a monologue or a Jamaican toasting record.

センラ#59

君の場合は?

EN

Okay, so there is four decades separating when you're working with LL Cool J and today. How similar or different from what like if you're working with an artist today, how different is what you're doing with that artist today compared to what you did with LL four decades ago?

ルービン#60

やめない。始めたら、それが何になりうるかを見たい。

EN

Probably not so different. It's it's probably pretty similar. Just it it depends on the artist like because LL was a solo rap artist and he didn't have a a band or make music. I was responsible for making the the tracks. And my version of that was a very stripped-down minimal thing. But now I get to work with bands sometimes that have a big sound and they're a lot of players and you I'm looking for the essence of each of these artists. And the essence tends to be stripped down, but it's stripped down to what they are. I just finished the new album with The Strokes and they're a band of five people. So it sounds like a band of five people. Doesn't sound less than that.

センラ#61

外から見るとすごくリラックスした禅みたいな雰囲気がある。でも下にはワーカホリックがいると思う。

EN

Mhm.

ルービン#62

もちろん。

EN

Sounds like what they are.

センラ#63

そうか。

EN

You have this idea of ruthless edit. I've heard you talk about a few times on on podcasts. Can you explain what that is?

ルービン#64

怠け者のワーカホリックだ。

EN

Sometimes for the sake of the whole work, removing things about it that you really love is part of the process. And instead of if you have if you have 100% and you know at the end you want to have 70% of what you have, like you have 30% too much, instead of whittling down that 30 to get to the 70, I would say reduce it to 40% let's say. Force yourself to get to 40% and then add back what's what's needed to get to the 70. And it it it works in a different way. You you have a better understanding of the work after the ruthless edit because you find out, especially with a group because in a group everybody votes. So with the Red Hot Chili Peppers, we'll record for an album, we might record 40 or 50 songs and then all of us vote on A, B, or C. And then if everyone picks it as an A song, that's going to be on the album. If it's really divided, it might not be. You know, it'll be it'll be a democratic process until we get down to like what is everyone together think is the best thing that we can make. That's a ruthless editing process.

センラ#65

怠け者のワーカホリック? もっと言って。仕事に感じないから?

EN

And you're just looking for the essence of what you think it could be great. So, like in that case, you're recording, let's say, 50 songs.

ルービン#66

いや、自分を強制してやっている。でも強制はする。気質としては何もしない方だ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#67

リック、信じないよ。

EN

And you say the album wants to have 10 or 12. Well, what about there's like there might be three that we can't live without.

ルービン#68

本当だ。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#69

こんなに愛してるのに?

EN

Is that the thought process?

ルービン#70

だから、美しいものが好きなんだ。美しいものに辿り着くには大量の仕事がいる。

EN

It helps to get to that point of what are the ones you can't live without, however few it is, and build from there, build out from there.

センラ#71

結果が好き?

EN

What other interests do you have outside of music? Like, are you into like architecture or Like, I Is there anybody The reason I ask you that is like is there anybody else in different domains that you still uh have a passion for, that you see that use similar ideas that you do?

ルービン#72

うん。そこに行きたい。「送信ボタンを押して世界と共有する」ところまで。その感覚が好きだ。君に聴いてもらえるくらい好きだ。でもそこまでの仕事は、「今日もスタジオに行かなきゃ」だ。

EN

In every domain, there are people who to make beautiful things. I like people who make beautiful things.

センラ#73

意外だ。

EN

But like do are you saying that there there thought process you find similarities between their thought process and their personal work?

ルービン#74

こんなにいい天気なのに、友達とランチに出たくないか、みたいな。人生の最初の25年くらいは、ニューヨークで週7日、1日16時間、暗い部屋で音楽をやっていた。今は外に出て、裸足で日向にいたい。

EN

it's all the same. I think most of what I do is not really about music. I happen to work in music, but it's not about the music. Does that make sense?

センラ#75

今は音楽よりポッドキャストの方が好き?

EN

It does, but say more about this.

ルービン#76

もっと好きかどうかはわからない。会える人、人から学ぶこと、どう考えるか、何かを作るビジョン、どうやり切るか、山あり谷ありの旅——何が効いて何が効かなかったか、予想外だった瞬間——がすごく面白い。

---

EN

You're at Shangri-La and you walk through the space and you see it doesn't feel like other places you've been.

センラ#77

もう少しそこに触れたい。ビリー・アイリッシュの兄が、自分とビリーの違いを言っていた。彼は音楽を作るプロセスが好きで、彼女は「作り終わった」ことが好きだ、と。君はビリー側? 終わったことが好き?

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#78

そうだと思う。啓示の瞬間が好きだと言おう。作業していて、ただまあまあで退屈で、本当はいたくない——そう感じる。でも何かが起きて、魔法みたいになる。何かを作ったというより、プロセスの中から何かが現れる。召喚される。奇跡みたいで、それが中毒になる感覚だ。

よくない、よくない、よくない——これを試して、あれを試して、ダメ、ダメ、ダメ。機械が壊れたみたいな事故かもしれない。でも聴いているものが急にすごくいい。何もないところから本当にいいものになる発見の瞬間。そのあとのプロセス全部は、それを守ることだ。すごく繊細だから。

奇跡が起きて、魔法が起きて、残りのプロセスで壊さないように守る。バンドがテイクを重ねていて本当にいいとき、演奏中に顔を見合わせる。怖い。終わってほしくない。止まるとコントロールできないし、もう一度はできない。時間の中のその瞬間で、魔法が起きる。それをたくさん待っている。でも楽しいとは言えない。忍耐が要る。

EN

It it has the same aesthetic as the records I make or the things that I work on, the things that I like, things that I buy, you know, the objects I buy would have the same aesthetic. So, it's all fitting into a I'd say worldview.

センラ#79

自分を強制してやる。

EN

Yeah, I feel this way, too, because like I mean, we we talked right before we started recording about, you know, podcasting. I think we're both have the same obsession with it. And I've had my first podcast for over a decade. And it started out with just me reading biographies of people that built businesses. But over time, I realized this same personality type, it's like the artist, the entrepreneur, the filmmaker, the musician. I've done podcasts on all of these kind of people and I'm like, I don't see any distinction between them. Yeah.

ルービン#80

うん。

EN

the same.

センラ#81

その瞬間にあきらめて、少し離れたことは?

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#82

ある。

EN

It's all the creative spirit.

センラ#83

じゃあ、本当にいい労働倫理と規律がある。でもできれば……

EN

I want to like they have a bunch of like selfish things I told you I wanted uh talk to you about because there's just some people that have made massive impacts on my life. I told you like I grew up listening to hip-hop. It's all I listen to this day. I listen to more podcasts than I listen to music now, but like it really gave like a put it a voice like a words to a feeling I had even maybe in my subconscious. Eminem was the first one that like I was I I heard his first album and I was like, this is how I feel. I didn't grow up in a trailer park in Michigan, but I know exactly what you're talking about with certain things with your family or certain things of like just becoming, you know, coming of age. I heard you say one time I'm like obsessed with I want to spend time with him and hopefully get him to record a podcast. And I know it's going to be very difficult, but especially for for you who've worked with, you know, the best of the best of the best people over almost half a century. And for you to say that he might be the most obsessive artist you've ever worked for it was like I literally screenshotted that and saved it on my phone and I look at it all the time. Why did you say that? Like can you just tell me about what it's like working with him?

ルービン#84

フラストレーションで退屈で、ものすごい忍耐が要る。ペンキが乾くのを待つみたいに、待って、待って、違うことを試して、何も効かない。何かが効くか、ただまとまるか——なぜかは言えない。

EN

It feels like his entire life is centered around writing words. He's totally preoccupied with that. So he always has a notebook. He's always making little notes. He writes tiny and tiny letters. And he's always making notes. And at one point I asked him because he's got notebooks and notebooks and notebooks and I said, "Are you are you working on new songs?" I said, "No, I'm just like keeping active. Keeping active in the skill set." And I said, "Are you going to put those in a song?" He probably said 90% of it will never be in a song. He's just writing. Just writing. And that's what he does. He writes.

センラ#85

特別な瞬間を殺してしまうことは?

EN

Does he apply that to like other elements of making a song though? Just not just writing? Cuz he does a lot of his own production.

ルービン#86

「これを守らなきゃ」と意識した瞬間、守るのが難しくなる。起きている最中に「これだ」と気づくと、ゴルフのイップスみたいになる。考え始めると、ただその中にいることができなくなる。自分から出て、起きること任せにしないといけない。たぶん僕よりアーティスト側。アーティストは自分がやっていることさえわからない場所に行く。パフォーマンスじゃない。何か別のもの。本物の瞬間が起きて、ゾクゾクする。

EN

He does. And I would say the same type of obsessive

センラ#87

今、魂に話しかけられてる感じだ。ステフ・カリーが「シュートするとき何を考える?」と聞かれて「まったく何も」と答えていた。

EN

It's what makes him great.

ルービン#88

まさにそれ。

EN

He's obsessed.

センラ#89

僕は本を読むのが仕事みたいだった。著者から「本質をどう掴んだ? 何を考えてる?」と聞かれて、「何も。読んで、引っかかるところに線を引くだけ。もう一度読んでまだ面白ければ、最初から面白かった」と答えた。二度読んでも面白いなら、ポッドキャストで誰かが言っても面白い。考えすぎると邪魔になる。

EN

Have you come across anybody that you consider great that hasn't that's not obsessed?

ルービン#90

同じ。何も考えていない。

EN

I'm sure there are. I have I have to think about it, but it it's That's [snorts] not the only way to do it. For some people, it happens in a more natural way, and for some people, it's more of a Work ethic is always a a part of it, but for some people, work ethic is the reason they are who they are. And there are other people who are just incredibly talented and have enough work ethic to get over the finish line.

センラ#91

面白い。じゃあ聞くけど——君はリック・ルービンだ。何でもできる。なぜこんなにポッドキャストに時間を使う?

EN

What do you think it's for you?

ルービン#92

人に会うのが好きだから。ポッドキャストの前から、興味のある人に連絡して時間を過ごして学んでいた。きっかけがはっきりしたのは、ダナ・ホワイトを紹介されたとき。

EN

I don't like to quit. I like to see things through. When I start something, I like to see what it can be.

センラ#93

来週彼と録るんだ。

EN

From outside, uh cuz you know, you have this whole very relaxed, like zen vibe.

ルービン#94

素晴らしい。彼はすごい。彼の方から「いつでも会うよ」と来て、家の外で3時間くらい話した。途中で「録ってもいい? 覚えきれない。この話がすごく好きだ」と言った。それが突破口だった。ポッドキャストってこういうことだ、と。もともと人生でやっていたことだ。録っていなかっただけで、面白いものを作る人に会い、時間を過ごし、好奇心でたくさん質問する。普通の人生の延長線上だ。だから好きなんだ。

---

EN

Yeah.

センラ#95

収録前にも話したけど、僕は世界でいちばんポッドキャストを聴いている人間かもしれない。何千エピソードも。昔から君のBroken Recordを聴いていて、すごかった。当時はミュージシャン中心で、Tetragrammatonではさらに別のレベルで、あらゆるすごい人と話している。

ショッピファイのトビ・リュトケと話したばかりで、彼の独特な頭のために君のエピソードで準備した。いちばん面白い会話のひとつだった。世界に何百万のポッドキャスターがいて、本当にすごいのは一握り。君のは本当にすごい。音楽で才能があるのにポッドキャストでも才能がある——なぜ? と分析して気づいた。40年以上やってきた本業とつながっている。君はプロの聞き手だ。

EN

But I I I swear I think underneath is like a workaholic.

ルービン#96

それは本当だ。

EN

Oh, for sure.

センラ#97

ゲストを聴いている。ゲストと今この瞬間にいる。それが、君がポッドキャストでもすごい理由のひとつだと思う。

EN

Okay.

ルービン#98

現実では、人は話すのが好きで、聞くのが好きじゃない。会話の最中に「次に何を言おう」と考えていて、本当にはそこにいない。交互に、自分の番を待っているだけ。これは違う。

音楽の聴き方から来ていると思う。僕は音楽をとても深く聴く。目を閉じて、本当に注意を払う。壁紙じゃない。音楽の中に入る。ある意味、音楽との関係のおかげで酒もドラッグもやらなかった。いい音楽を聴くのは完全にサイケデリックな体験だから。感じられて、運ばれる。目を開けると、自分がどこにいるか驚く。いなくなっていたから。

深く聴く。本当に理解したい。だから質問するのに抵抗がない。言っていることを本当に聴いて、わからないことがあれば明確にするための質問をする。判断もしない。自分のやり方が正しいとも思わないし、言われたことを自分の考えと比べない。自分の考えは関係ない。共有されたものを本当に理解したいだけだ。自分の信念とすごく違うことを言われたら、もっと知りたい。「どうしてそこに至った? なぜそう思う?」——何か学べるかもしれない。自分が間違っているかもしれない。何も知らない。もっと知りたい。

本当に聴くと、人に会える。プロの聞き手として気づいたのは、本当に聴いてくれる人と話すのは身構えを解く、ということだ。それくらい珍しい。たいていの人は聴いていない。

EN

I'm a lazy workaholic.

センラ#99

君のポッドキャストを聴くと、相手の人間への本気の興味と、「意見を作るのではなく理解したい」という欲求がある。

EN

A lazy workaholic? You got No, you got to say more about that.

ルービン#100

それがそれだ。ただ理解したい。視野を広げたい。君の目で世界を見たい。美しいものを作った人の世界の見方、偉大な発見のプロセス——好奇心だ。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#101

好奇心に終わりがないように見える。

EN

It's what it is. Like uh I

ルービン#102

興味がある。ずっと興味があった。自分をリサーチャーだと思っている。インターネットが来てから、興味のあるものにはどこまでも深く潜る。反対意見も読んで、さらに深く。理解しようとする。好奇心だ。

EN

Cuz it doesn't feel like work? Explain.

センラ#103

リサーチャー?

EN

No, no, no. I have to force myself to do it, but I do force myself. My demeanor would be to do nothing.

ルービン#104

うん。ほとんどの時間はリサーチだ。プロの研究者じゃないけど、興味があることは全部知りたい。日常的なことでも。コーヒーを飲むなら、何百万のコーヒーを味わって最高を探したい。最高のマシンについて詳しい人の意見を全部読んで、全部試す。何であれ、最良のバージョンを見つけるファナティックな献身だ。

EN

Rick, I don't believe that.

センラ#105

興味のポケットにハマると、全部を飲み込む?

EN

It's true.

ルービン#106

そう言える。終わりがない。そのプロセスの終わりには着かない。

---

EN

No, you love this too much, though. What do you mean?

センラ#107

長いことやり続ける人を尊敬する。尊敬するものが人を表す。僕はこういうポッドキャストを死ぬまでやりたい。5年後、10年後の成功って何? ひとつはまだやっていること。ふたつは、誇りに思えるものを作っていること。

EN

That's the So, I love the beautiful thing. And it takes a lot of work to get to the beautiful thing.

ルービン#108

それがそれだ。

EN

You like the end result?

センラ#109

ダウンロード数でも広告本数でもない。ただそれだけ。ある朝「もうやりたくない」と目覚めるのが怖い。

EN

Yeah, I like I like to get there. I like get to the point of where it's like, "Okay, press the send button and share it with the world." That's a great feeling. Like I I like it enough for you to get to hear it.

ルービン#110

それが起きるのは、やるべき別の何かが上書きするときだけで、それもいいことだ。

EN

Okay.

センラ#111

それでも怖い。

EN

But all of the work up until then, it's like, "Oh my god, I have to go to the studio today."

ルービン#112

9歳の頃、鏡の前でカードマジックをたくさん練習した。すごく楽しくて、マジシャンのコミュニティがあった。子供だったけど大人のマジシャンと一緒で、外の人には全部秘密でも、マジシャン同士は共有を愛する。9歳からたぶん16歳まで、そのコミュニティが居場所で、学びたかった。

音楽が人生のなかでどんどん大きくなって、どっちもフルタイムの占有だ——職業という意味じゃなく、時間を占めるという意味——と気づいた。マジックに尽くすか、音楽に尽くすか。どこかで音楽が勝った。でもそれは喪失じゃなかった。愛していたものを手放して、新しい命を持った別の愛するものに移った。長いこと音楽をやってきて、他のものを作るのも好きだ。音楽より他のものを作る人生になっても、それはいい。僕を興奮させるのは「作ること」そのものだ。

EN

That's surprising to me.

センラ#113

だから聞き続けていた。ポッドキャストは、1〜2時間話して終わりで、明日またできる。アルバムや名曲より、創作から出力までの時間が短い。怠け者のワーカホリックと言っていたけど、これはほとんど仕事に感じない。音楽の仕事の描写には少し驚いた。

EN

Yeah. It's like It's such a beautiful day. Wouldn't it be nice to just go out and have lunch with friends? But my whole life has been, you know, most of my life was in the the first 25 years was in a dark room for 16 hours a day, 7 days a week in New York City working on music. Now you would rather be out here barefoot butt naked in the sun I think. No,

ルービン#114

確かに仕事でもある。現れないといけないから。ある時間にいると約束したら、その朝「今日はやりたくない」と思っても仕事だ。他の人と約束した場所に行って、やる。でも予定されたことをやりたくない日がほとんどだ。選んだ時点ではやりたかったとわかっている。でもベッドから出なくてもいいのは気持ちいいし、ビーチを歩くのもいい。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#115

アドバイスをもらっている気分だ。『The Creative Act』についても別のポッドキャストをした。頭の中にあって言葉がなかったことが、たくさん言葉になっている。今の僕は「働いた日がない」感覚で、朝起きるとやらざるを得ない。正しい道にいる確信がある。仕事に感じるのは編集のときだけで、それは大嫌いだけど、よくなると思うからやる。

EN

but I would not then, not then. But but I'd rather you know, I like being outside, I like having fun with friends, I like hanging out with my family.

ルービン#116

いい例だ。楽しくない部分はある。時間はいちばん貴重な資源で、事前にスケジュールした日には、いつもやりたいとは限らない。

EN

Do you like being podcast more than music now?

センラ#117

でも君は時間と人生を完全にコントロールしている。

EN

I don't know if it's I like it more. I like the people I get to meet and I'm interested in learning about people. I like learning how people think, their vision to make something, how they follow through to make it and learning the the the roller coaster ride, that journey of building things, how it worked, where it didn't work, what ideas they thought may have worked and didn't. When they were surprised in the process, so interesting to me.

ルービン#118

うん、選んでいる。自分が作ったと認めないといけない。誰にも強制されていない。現れると言ったから現れる。

EN

I I want to like pull on this for a little bit if you don't mind.

センラ#119

日常ではそれでも仕事に感じる?

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#120

うん。何もしなくても幸せ、みたいな。でも本当かはわからない。そうだったことは一度もない。

EN

So I heard um Billie Eilish's brother who I think they have a close collaboration with and he so he was describing the difference between him and Billie. He said that he enjoyed the process of making music. She enjoyed having made the music. So are you more like Billie in that case? Like you like that it's done?

センラ#121

何十年も前に仕事をやめられたはずだ。すごいものを作ることに中毒だと思う。

EN

I think so. I I I'll say I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something, it's just okay. It's boring. I'd probably rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Like something appears. It doesn't it's not like we made it. It's like something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. That's like a miracle. And that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try this, we try this, this doesn't work, this doesn't work, this doesn't work. And it could be a mistake. The machine could not work. We can hear something and the machine broke. But what you hear But what we're listening to is really cool all of a sudden. That's the feeling that that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's it's super delicate.

ルービン#122

うん。そして怠け者だ。それも本物の一部だ。毎日「さあ行こう」じゃない。毎日「ああ、仕事に行かなきゃ」だ。

EN

Mhm.

センラ#123

がっかりだ。悲しい。

EN

When it happens, it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. When it comes together, let's say a band is playing and doing take after take after take. When it's really good, we all kind of look at each other like as they're playing, it's like it's scary because you don't want it to end. Like you don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it, we can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting for those. But I can't say that's fun. It's not fun. It's It's just like takes a lot of patience.

ルービン#124

でも世界で「自分であること」に対して金をもらっているほとんど誰か、は君だ。

EN

yourself to do it.

センラ#125

そう言って、それが当てはまらないと言っている。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#126

いや、僕は僕だ。何にも現れない自分の一部がいて、毎日それを乗り越えている、と言っている。

EN

Have you ever just like I'm gave up in that moment and just walked away for a little bit?

センラ#127

トニー・ブールダンとは会った? ファンだった?

EN

Mhm.

ルービン#128

会ったことはない。ファンではあった。

EN

So you Okay, so you do have this like

センラ#129

本も全部読んで番組も全部見た。『Kitchen Confidential』でショックだったのは、ヘロイン中毒として薬物を手に入れるのに使っていた労働倫理が、習慣を断ったあと同じまま、執筆とテレビ番組作りに向かったことだ。最悪の方向から生成的な方向に向け直して、飛んだ。でも君と似たことを言っていた。「奥のどこかに、大麻を吸って一日中ベッドにいたい男がいて、毎日その男と戦っている」と。文章が美しい。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#130

うん。その男と戦って現れないといけないのは本当だ。ペンキが乾くのを待つような部分もある。でも何かいいことが起きた魔法の瞬間が、中毒になっている感覚だ。よくなかった、よくない、神よ、いい——どうしてそうなったかも誰も知らない奇跡。コントロールできない。それが本当に魔法だ。魔法の部分には中毒だが、そこに至る全部には中毒じゃない。永遠に待つだけの忍耐はある。でも楽しくはない。

釣りが好きな人がいるみたいに。一日釣りに出ても魚が釣れない日がある。スタジオで1日、1週間、いいことが何も起きないこともある。コントロール外だ。でもいいことが起きたとき——「ああ、これだ。だからここにいる」——になる。

EN

really good work work ethic.

センラ#131

その釣りの比喩は何年か前に聴いて、すごく大事にしている。エイコンがエミネムと仕事した話をしていた。デトロイトに行って夜のセッションだと思って夜7時に電話したら、「明日会おう」と。翌日行ってみたら、仕事のように9時にスタジオに来て書いている。昼に「ランチ取ってくる」とヴァースの途中で立ち上がる。1時に戻って、5時に「また明日」。エイコンが言いたかったのは——インスピレーションを待たない。毎日現れて、仕事をすれば来る、と信じていることだ。釣りとまったく同じだ。

EN

You have work ethic and discipline.

ルービン#132

うん。インスピレーションも本物だ。でも両方だ。インスピレーションだけ待っていたら永遠に来ない。働いて、そこにいて、現れないといけない。起きること許す練習をしていなければ起きない。現れたからといって起きる保証はない。でも現れなければ起きない。

---

EN

Yeah.

センラ#133

君のおかげでジョニー・キャッシュを知った。音楽がいいだけでなく、作り方の話も好きだった。蒸留すると——制約は味方だ、と。全部はできない。人工的に制約すると、創造性を強制される。キャリアで何度も使っている?

EN

Okay. But you would still be if you could

ルービン#134

うん。パレットを作るようなものだ。いちばん響くアルバムは、アーティストに20枚あっても、曲を聴けば「これは7枚目にしか載っていない音だ」とわかるもの。バンドはいつもバンドに聞こえるのに、この曲群だけが他と違う。録音の仕方、テーマ、今まで使わなかった楽器——キャリアの中の定義的な瞬間として、同じものの続きじゃないアルバムが好きだ。

EN

It's frustrating and and boring and takes a great deal of patience. It's like waiting for paint to dry. You're just waiting, waiting, waiting. And trying different things and nothing works. Until something either works or something happens and it just comes together and and I can't tell you why.

センラ#135

それが制約とどう結びつく?

EN

Explain like what people do to kill these special moments though.

ルービン#136

このプロジェクトにだけ適用される一連のルールを作ることで起きる。それが制約だ。

EN

Once you get saying like we have to protect this, we have to protect this. Once you're aware of it it's harder to protect. Like in the in the process of it happening. If you realize this is it. It's like it's like um what is it in golf? The yips. You know, like when when you're playing golf if you like if you [clears throat] start thinking about it instead of just being in it you can't do it anymore. So it's almost like you have to get out of yourself to allow it to happen. Maybe not me, but for the artist. The artist has to get to this place where it's like they don't even know they're doing it. It just happens. It's not a performance. It's something else. It's it's a it's just like a real moment happens. And it's thrilling.

センラ#137

ジョニー・キャッシュの例では?

EN

I think you're speaking to my soul right now because there's a something I heard Steph Curry talk about one time where they're like "What do you think of when you're taking a shot?" And he goes, "Absolutely nothing."

ルービン#138

最初の1枚がアコースティックになるとは事前に知らなかった。録音のプロセスで学んだ。いちばん面白いバージョンは、ひとりで歌っているとき——リビングルームのデモ、僕に曲を歌ってくれたとき——だった。スタジオでミュージシャンとバンドでやると、それほど面白くなかった。それは事前に計画したアイデアじゃなかった。

素材については、僕の中のジョニー・キャッシュは「Man in Black」のイメージだった。黒い男は神話的なキャラクターで、ただのジョニー・キャッシュではない。伝説的なジョニー・キャッシュ。ジョニー・キャッシュ本人は面白い曲を歌うかもしれない。Man in Blackはたぶん歌わない。だから選んだ曲はいつも、「伝説の神話的キャラクターが歌うものは何か」という目で見ていた。

EN

Exactly.

センラ#139

この場合の制約は、君とジョニーとギター。ピックも使わず、指で弾いていた、と。

EN

And so like when I I read books for a living essentially before I started this and you know, people I've had authors reach out to me after I did their book and they're like, "How did you get to the essence of it? Like what were you thinking? What are you thinking of when you're doing this?" And I was like, "Nothing. I just read and if something sticks jumps out to me, I don't think it all. I just underline it." And then I'll go back through if I when I reread the highlight, if it's still interesting, it was interesting the first time. Now it's interesting the second time. It's probably interesting just 10 million memes out there. I'm not unique.

ルービン#140

うん。でも大きな部分は素材選びだ。あのアルバム群ではそれが大きい。

EN

Same.

センラ#141

Man in Blackの視点で、ある程度の重み(グラビタス)があるもの。

EN

And there's no way I read this line twice. And if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think of it as interesting. He's like in fact overthink it. Overthink of oh, this person might hear it or this kind of this many people will hear it.

ルービン#142

ただ面白い曲じゃない。神話的なキャラクターが歌うのに合う、ある程度の重みが必要だった。

---

EN

It's in the way.

センラ#143

君について読んだり聴いたりしたすべてからすると、「偉大なものは委員会では作れない」に同意すると思う。

EN

Nothing. I'm thinking of nothing.

ルービン#144

正しい。そうなるのは珍しい。

EN

Yes.

センラ#145

でもバンドの場合もある。起業でも、グループでもだいたい中心人物がいる。バンドでも強い人格がより影響する?

EN

That's really interesting. let me let me ask you this though. So, you're … Rick Rubin. You can do whatever you want. Why are you choosing to spend so much time podcasting then?

ルービン#146

バンドを偉大にするのは、違うミュージシャンがどう音楽を聴き、一緒に弾くかだ。単一の視点である必要はない。ビートルズはいい例で、ジョンとポールは本当に違う人で、違う曲を書き、違うアプローチをした。ジャガーとリチャーズも同じ。対立がある。君の言ったこととは違うモデルだ。

一方、トム・ペティとハートブレイカーズでは、トムが旗手でみんながトムの後ろに並ぶ。全員すごいけど、最終決定はトムだ。U2は民主的で、バンド全員が好きじゃないといけない。3人が好きでも1人がダメなら起きない。それも彼らには機能するモデルだ。

---

EN

I like meeting the people. And even before the podcast started, I would still if someone was interesting to me, I would reach out to them, want to spend time with them, hang out with them, and just learn from them, really. I can remember the the one where it became obvious to do the podcast was Someone introduced me to Dana White.

センラ#147

制約のデザインに戻ると、ジョニー・キャッシュはとてもシンプル。40年前の「プロデュースじゃなくリデュース」に戻る。2023年に600〜700本くらいポッドキャストを聴いたと思う。その年いちばんよかった1本は、君とジミー・アイオヴィーンのTetragrammatonだった。ジミーは10歳くらい年上で——

EN

I'm recording with him next week.

ルービン#148

ほぼぴったり10歳上。誕生日が1日違い。

EN

Great. He's great.

センラ#149

初めて会った頃の話がすごかった。何かを聴かせたら、ジミーが「あんなにシンプルなものがまだ作れたらいいのに」と言った。君は「きっとできるよ」と。なぜ彼はそう言った? 時間とともに何が起きる?

EN

He's incredible.

ルービン#150

彼はプロデューサーだった。できることが増えると、それをやりがちになる。大きくなりがちだ。当時の僕はまだ十分やっていなかった。最初のレコードで、The Cultの『Electric』が最初のロックのレコードだった。

EN

And I said, he actually reached out to me. He's like, "Anytime you want to meet, I'm down." I was like, "Great. Let's do it." We met. We sat at my house. We sat outside to talk for about 3 hours. And at some point in the conversation, I said, "Do you mind if I record this? Because I feel like I'm not going to remember what we're saying, and I'm really liking this story." And that was sort of a breakthrough of like, "This is kind of what doing a podcast is like. I'm I already do this in my life. I don't record them. But I meet the people that make things that are interesting to me, and I spend time with them, and I listen to what they do, and I ask a lot of questions because I'm curious. So, it really is an outgrowth of my normal life. So, I like doing that.

センラ#151

ヒップホップでほぼ10年、あるいは半分くらい経ったあと?

EN

Deel is how the best founders turn the world into their talent pool. I've been studying how history's greatest founders operate for a decade, and one thing they all have in common is they understand that recruiting and hiring the very best talent is your most important priority. A players recognize other A players, which is why top companies like Ramp, [music] Shopify, 11 Labs, Uber, and DoorDash all use Deel. Many of the top founders I know have personally invested [music] in Deel after using their product. And what they discovered is that Deel is the best company in the [music] world at building infrastructure for global hiring. Deel will help your business hire, pay, and manage any worker anywhere in the world so you can retain [music] the best talent anywhere and spend the rest of your time focusing on what you do best, delivering value [music] to your customers. The founder of 11 Labs has a great description of the value Deel can give your company. He said, "We built 11 Labs to break down language and communication barriers. With Deel enabling us to hire and support exceptional [music] talent anywhere, we can accelerate our innovation and bring more voices, stories, and ideas to every corner [music] of the world." Deel is trusted by over 40,000 businesses. Learn how they can help your business today by going to deel.com/cenora. That is deel.com/cenora. We were talking before we started recording like I may be the person that's most successful

ルービン#152

いや、同じ時期。まだニューヨーク。まだNYUの寮に住んでいた。

EN

podcasting in the world. I listen to thousands of episodes. I was listening to your podcast Broken Record back in the day. I was like, "This is incredible." And you were heavily into like interviewing musicians back then. That was the format of that show was just talking to musicians. And then Tetragrammaton, you took, in my opinion, to another level. And you're talking to all kinds of incredible people. I listened to I just had a conversation with Toby Lutke, founder of Shopify.

センラ#153

じゃあ本当に最初で、できることがそれだけだからシンプルだった。

EN

Yeah, amazing.

ルービン#154

すごくシンプルなことをやっていて、できる限りそれに忠実でいた。途中で少し外れた例はたぶん2、3ある。ディスコグラフィ全体で、制御不能になったり、アーティストのビジョンが違いすぎたり。そういうときはたいてい二度と一緒にやらない。完成まで行かないことも1、2回ある。見え方が違いすぎる。ジョー・コッカーとそうだった。スタジオに入って、僕はジョー・コッカーの見え方を持っていて、彼は違うビジョンを持っていた。同じページにいなくて、合わなくて、起きなかった。

EN

I used one of your episodes to prep because he's such such a unique mind. One of the most interesting conversations I had. But I I was I I analyzed people like, you know, there's handful of podcasters that are really great. There's a couple million in the directory. Only a handful are really great. Yours is really great. And I'm like, "Why the hell how is it unfair this guy is like gifted at music and now he's gifted at podcasting? Why is this the case?" And what I came up with and I started analyzing and thinking about what you do in your day job, what you've done for over four decades. And I was like he's a professional listener.

センラ#155

ジミー・アイオヴィーンを長いこと知っている視点で、彼の特異さは何だと思う? エンジニアからプロデューサー、レーベル、アーティストと事業——何が特別?

EN

That's true.

ルービン#156

いい趣味と、すごい労働倫理。その二つだ。

EN

I don't he's listening to the guest. He is in the moment with the guest.

センラ#157

この会話の前まで、二人はほぼ対極だと思っていた。君は炎に引き寄せられる蛾のようにやりたいことに吸い寄せられ、彼はいつも仕事だと。好きじゃなくて、ある部分は好きでも、基本的に自分を強制していた、と。

EN

Yes.

ルービン#158

彼がすごくうまくまとめた言葉がある。ジミーの言葉で、「僕は銀行業で、君は教会業だ」と。それが違いだ。

EN

And it's like that is why one of the reasons why obviously you're you have a lot of interesting things to say, but one of the reasons in my opinion that you're so great at podcasting.

センラ#159

説明して。大好きだ。

EN

Well, I think in real life people like to talk and they don't like to listen. And often in a conversation you'll be with someone and they'll be saying something and you'll be thinking about okay, this is what I'm going to say in response to that. You're not really not really present. Back and forth, that's what it is. Like two people waiting for their turn to say what they think. And um this is different. And it really I think it came from listening to music cuz I listen to music in a very deep way. I close my eyes. I really pay attention. It's not it's not wallpaper. It's like I go into the music. In some ways I think my relationship with music allowed me to never drink or take drugs because listening to music for me is totally psychedelic experience. I can feel the music and I can be transported by the music. Not all music, but good music. So I close my eyes, I feel it and then at the end of it I open my eyes and I'm surprised where I am because I'm I've been gone when I'm listening. So I listen deeply and I want to know. I really want to understand this. So I'm comfortable asking questions and I really listen to what someone's saying and if someone says something I don't understand, I'll ask a question to clarify so that I can understand it. I also don't have any judgment. I don't I don't think that I have a way that like my way is the right way and I'm not comparing what's being said to me about what I think. What I think is not part of it. I'm just I just want to truly understand what's being shared with me. And if someone says something that's very different than what I believe, I want to know more. It's like, how did you get to that? What What Why do you think that? Because maybe I'll learn something. Maybe Maybe I have it wrong, you know? Like that I don't I don't know anything. I want to know more. So, through talking to people and really listening, you really get to meet people. And And as a as a professional listener, I found some people it's disarming to talk to someone who really listens, because it's so rare. Most people don't listen.

ルービン#160

彼が言ったのは、僕は情熱と信念でやっていて、彼はボトムライン、何がビジネスに効くかでやっている。二つの違うメンタリティだ。

EN

When I listen to your podcast, I feel you have this combination of like sincere interest

センラ#161

『The Defiant Ones』で、トム・ペティの曲を聴いて「これはハウス・ミュージックだ」と言う。トムが「どういう意味?」と聞くと、「あと何枚アルバムを出すにせよ、その曲は家を買ってくれる」と。

EN

Yes. True.

ルービン#162

うん。そこは違う。僕らは違う。

EN

in the other human being

センラ#163

トムは「音楽をそんなふうに言われたことはない」と。スタジオのクレイジーな話——フィル・スペクターが肉屋の格好で銃をいっぱい付けて来る、みたいな——君自身が見た中で印象的なものは?

EN

Yes.

ルービン#164

ODB、オール・ダーティ・バスタード(ウータン)のセッションを覚えている。会ったことがなくて、評判が先に来ていて緊張していた。何に入るかわからない。だから犬を連れていった。ドレッドヘアのプーリーだ。ドレッドの犬を見たら、何が起きても面白い。友達に全部撮ってもらった。カメラと犬がいれば大丈夫だろう、と。

EN

and a desire I think you just said this, but the way I think about it is the way I think about you when I listen to your podcast is like a desire not to form an opinion, but to understand.

センラ#165

何の評判でそうまでしたの? 暴力?

EN

That's it. That's it. I just want to understand. I want to understand to broaden my scope, to see the world I want to see the world through your eyes, you know? I want to see the world through Someone made something that's beautiful to me, I want to understand how they see the world. Someone makes a great discovery. I want to know what was the process that allowed that to happen. I'm curious.

ルービン#166

いろいろ。暴力もありうる。よくないいろんなこと。準備できていなかったこともあったけど、彼が好きだった。ファンだった。入って彼は犬を指して「彼はいい」。カメラを指して「出ていけ」。それでセッションはまあまあうまくいった。

---

EN

Yeah, it doesn't seem to be an end to your curiosity, either.

センラ#167

トビ・リュトケが「正しいやり方はひとつじゃない。たぶん100ある。自分にいちばん合うものを見つけて、それをやれ」と言っていた。同意すると思う。ドイツ系のコンピュータ・エンジニアなのに、人生をほぼ直観で動かしている。君も全部直観だ。

EN

I'm interested. I've always been interested. I I think of myself as a researcher. I've always Like when the internet came along, anything that I'm interested in, I'll go forever going deeper and deeper and deeper into a topic just to get any glimpse and to read opposing opinions and go deeper and deeper and deeper and just try to understand. I'm curious.

ルービン#168

全部直観。

EN

You think of yourself as a researcher?

センラ#169

なぜ人生全体が直観的な感覚で動いているのか。

EN

Yeah. That's what I do most of the time is research.

ルービン#170

ずっと感じたことに従ってきた。うまくいった。うまくいかなかったら別のことを試したかもしれない。でも自分に正しいと感じるものに忠実でいて、神の恩寵で他の人にも響いたから続けられている。もしそうならなかったら、小さな規模で自分のために作り続けて、普通の仕事を持っていただろう。

EN

Okay, I don't know about this. Tell me about this.

センラ#171

その直観は、「人間の知識への懐疑」とつながっている? 僕たちはほとんど何も知らない、と。

EN

Well, I'm not a researcher in a professional way, but anything I'm interested in, I want to know everything about it, whatever it is. And even mundane things. If I drink coffee, I want to taste a million coffee I want to find the best coffee. I want to read what every person who knows about the best machine says about every machine and then test every machine and it's just a fanatical devotion to finding the best version of whatever it is.

ルービン#172

うん。

EN

Is it all consuming for you? When you when you find these these pockets of interest?

センラ#173

エジソンの有名な言葉で、「我々は何についても1000分の1パーセントも知らない」と。

EN

I'd say so. There's no end. I don't get to an end of that process.

ルービン#174

信じている。何も知らないと信じている。

EN

I admire people that do things for a very long period of time and I you can tell a lot about people by what they admire. It's like I want to do these kind of podcasts till I die. Like it's like what's your strategy what's what's success look like for you for in 5 years and 10 years? One that I'm still doing it and two that I'm just making things that I'm proud of.

センラ#175

何も知らないと信じるなら、できることは直観に導かれることだけだ。

EN

That's it.

ルービン#176

うん。試して、何が効くかを見る。ひとつ効いたからといって、それが「そのやり方」だとは限らない。そのケースで効いたひとつのやり方だ。

---

EN

There's no … download number, there's no how many ads I sell. It's just like that's it. And I'm terrified that one day, you know, I'm going to wake up and be like I don't want to do this anymore.

センラ#177

ジェイ・Zとエミネムのアプローチの対比を聞いたことがある。両方と仕事した。どれくらい違う?

EN

No, but the only reason that would happen is because something else would take over that you have to do and that would be fine, too.

ルービン#178

エムは歌詞を書き下ろして、とても勤勉な働き方をする。書いてからもテイクを重ねて、いろんなことを試す。ジェイはずっと自発的だ。全部頭の中で起きて、立ち上がって1回か2回言って終わり。

EN

It's still terrifying.

センラ#179

部屋にいるときのエネルギーは?

EN

When I was when I was 9 years old, I spent a lot of time practicing magic at card magic in front of a mirror.

ルービン#180

エムはあらゆる面に完全に関わる。ジェイは「いろいろかけて。好きなのが聞こえたら考える。なければまた明日」だ。必要なときだけそこにいて、アイデアが閃くものを聴いたら、「何度もかけて」と言って後ろのソファに座り、長いあいだ静かに聴き続ける。25〜30分後、「できた」と立ち上がって部屋に走り込み、録音して、頭の中から全部やる。すごい。ああいう人は彼だけだ。

EN

Mhm.

センラ#181

『マグナ・カルタ・ホーリー・グレイル』を2週間で、という話は有名だ。

EN

And that was really fun and there's a whole community of musician mu magicians and I was just a little kid, but like grown up magicians and if you're truly interested in magic, um there are all these meetings and they get together and talk about stuff and if you're an outsider, everything's a secret, but if you're a magician, they love sharing. So, it's a really cool community to be part of. And that was my community from 9 until probably 16. Tho- those were the people I hung out with and that were the people that we shared this interest and I just wanted to learn. And then music became more and more popular in in my life. Like music became I mean at some point like Dude, I can't do both. They're both These are both full-time occupations. When I say occupations, I don't mean jobs. I mean something that occupy my time. I can either devote myself to doing magic or devote myself to doing music and at some point music won. But that wasn't a loss. I didn't lose anything. That's a beautiful way to think about It's like I let go of the thing that I loved for this other thing that I loved that just took on this new life. And um I've done music for a long time and I like making other things, too. And if it became if my life became about making other things more than making music, that'd be okay. It's more about the making that excites me.

ルービン#182

アルバムのほとんどはとても速く作られた。

EN

This is why I kept asking like do you think you'd like making a podcast like we can have a conversation. We could be doing your show right now instead of mine and at the end of this hour or two hours like we have it's done. We have something we can we can do it again tomorrow. Like the the the amount of time from you know, creation to output is so much shorter than an album or even a great song.

センラ#183

スタジオの外でも長く洗練しているんだと思うけど。

EN

True.

ルービン#184

ときどきは、ときどきは全部その場で起きる。

EN

And if you're what you're saying like you I think you called yourself a lazy workaholic. I'm saying lazy alcoholic. Lazy workaholic.

センラ#185

クレイジーだ。エムは曲を永遠にやる。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#186

うん。とても違う。両方すごい。違う人格タイプだと思う。

EN

Like it almost it's almost like this isn't work. This isn't feel like work to me.

センラ#187

エムの人格タイプは?

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#188

執着的。完璧主義者。良くするために何でもやる覚悟。勤勉でハードワーカー。ジェイはずっとリラックスしている。彼にはただ起きている感じ。違うスタイルだ。

EN

I feel like you I was a little surprised with the way you described working in music that does feel like

センラ#189

二人のうち、君の働き方に近いのは?

EN

Yeah, for sure. It's also work because I I have to show up. If you commit to be somewhere at a certain time that's work because the that morning I might wake up and think I don't really want to do that today. But it's agreed to with other people. I'm going to be at this place and we're going to do this thing, so I have to show up. But most days I don't want to do the things that I'm scheduled to do. Now, at the time that I choose At the time that I choose to do them, I want to do them. I want I know I want to do them. But still, it's really nice not to have to get out of bed. Or it's nice to go for a walk on the beach.

ルービン#190

違うことをしているから言いづらい。相手によって変わる。アーティストが必要としていることが僕の仕事だ。完全に手を離す場合もあれば、最初から一緒に考えないといけない場合もある。

EN

So yeah, I I think I might be well-positioned. This is I'm just now getting advice from you because I I'm a huge fan of you, uh and I respect the way you think. Anyways, I just did another podcast on the the book you wrote, Creative Act, by the way. And I just There's so many ideas that you put into words that are in my head that I didn't have words for in there. So if I right now I feel like this is I don't work a day in my life. I feel like I wake up and I'm like compelled or like I don't even know the word to use it. Like then there's no doubt that I'm just on the right path. If If I was sitting here and we weren't recording and I was just seeking your advice. Like I don't feel it's that work at all. The only time it feels like work is when I have to edit, which I … hate, but I do it anyways cuz I think it makes it better.

センラ#191

プロの聞き手とつながるね。ポッドキャストでもスタジオでも、相手への本気の関心。目標は君自身にはほとんど関係なく、相手がいちばんいい自分になる奉仕だ、と。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#192

うん。それは正確だと思う。

EN

But that's the only time.

センラ#193

君の人生で、その役割を果たす人はいる?

EN

It's a good example. There are parts of it that are not always fun. And when you're committing time, like time is our most valuable resource and we when we're committing our time to doing something in advance, which we do, we pre-schedule, the day of, you don't always want to do that thing.

ルービン#194

いるかわからない。誰かが僕をプロデュースしているかはわからない。

EN

But I feel you have complete control over your time and your life.

センラ#195

リデュースできる? ここには削るものがないかも。

EN

Yes, I I choose it.

ルービン#196

わからない。幸運なことに、友達と家族は僕のやっていることに特に興味がない。現実がまわりにある。「それはクレイジー」「やめろ」——「悪いアイデアだ」が多い。面白いのは、「悪いアイデアだ」と聞いて「たぶん君が正しい」となることもあれば、「見せてやる。いいアイデアだって見せてやる」となることも多い。やらざるを得ない感じだ。

EN

I choose it. And I have to acknowledge I made this. No one's forcing me to do this. I said I would show up. I have to show up.

センラ#197

インプットはたくさん取るけど、抵抗はすると思う。

EN

But in your day-to-day, that still feels like work.

ルービン#198

心は変えない。でもアイデアを聞くのは開いているし、助けも歓迎する。誰かがよくする提案をして、そう見えるなら最高だ。閉じた心ではない。経験ある知恵でも、いつも使うとは限らない。

EN

Yeah, it's like I'd be happy not doing anything. Well, I I don't know. I don't know if that's true cuz I just know what It's never been It's never been the case. I've always

センラ#199

大きなエゴがあると思う?

EN

Cuz you could have stopped working decades ago.

ルービン#200

ないと思う。

EN

Yes.

センラ#201

でも自己信頼は強い。

EN

And I think you're addicted to making great …

ルービン#202

自己信頼はたくさんある。

EN

Yes. And I'm lazy. It's a real part of it. I'm telling you an honest piece of this, which is every day, it's not like, "Let's go." Every day it's like, "Oh, no. I got to go work."

センラ#203

19歳のときに会った人が「見たなかでいちばん自己信頼のある19歳だった」と言っていた。

EN

You're disappointing me. I feel I'm sad. I'm sad.

ルービン#204

そのミックスだと思う。若い頃に瞑想を学んで、瞑想は人生の大きな部分だった。エゴの話でも、自分の話でもなかった。体験していることを共有できる自信だ。「すごい」と聞こえるものと、「まだ足りない」と聞こえるもの——誰が何を言っても覆せない。感じられる。

EN

But it doesn't feel like it feels like out of almost anybody in the world that gets paid for being them

センラ#205

自分の判断への自信。さっきは知恵のある人の話も聞いていたのに。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#206

自分の判断への自信と言うとき——これはこう見える、と言っている。正しいとも、いちばんいいとも言わない。こう見える。はっきり見える。票を投げるならこれに投げる。でも「僕のやり方か、それ以外か」ではまったくない。

---

EN

is you.

センラ#207

何かを作っているときの内なる独白は? ポジティブ、ネガティブ、自己批判的?

EN

Yes.

ルービン#208

場合による。批判的なことは稀だ。だいたい最初は不安から始まる。何でもありうるから怖い。何が起きるかわからない。

EN

And you're saying that's not the case.

センラ#209

今でも。

EN

No, I'm me. I'm definitely me. There is a part of me that doesn't want to show up for anything. And I have to overcome that every day. That's what I'm saying.

ルービン#210

うん。過去に成功があると、自分がいるからうまくいくはず、という期待もある。プレッシャーを感じる。何もコントロールできないと知っている。あるがままになる。忍耐はあるし、良くなるまで待つとわかっている。実験から始めて、何になりうるかを見る。いいものの片鱗が聞こえた瞬間、肩の力が抜ける。それまでは開通すぎる。方向が多すぎる。何かが着地したら落ち着く。「少なくとも進む方向がある」。永遠にその方向にいるとは限らない。でも方向がある方が、ないよりいい。最初は方向がない。

EN

Did you ever spend any time with Tony Bourdain when he was alive?

センラ#211

自己批判的な内なる声が常に鳴っているわけではない、と。

EN

Never have.

ルービン#212

一度もない。

EN

Were you ever a fan of any of his?

センラ#213

聞いた理由は、昨日会った時価総額100億ドルの起業家が、毎朝5時半に起きて倒産を前提に生きていて、パラノイアが自分を良くしていると思っているからだ。よくある。僕も昔は自分にかなり辛くて自己批判的だった。ブラッド・ジェイコブスとも話したけど、彼もそうで、60代になってから「逆効果で何の助けにもならない」と。ある日パチンと切れて、もうやらなくなった。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#214

それはいい。

EN

Okay, so I read all his books, watched all his shows. And in his book, I was shocked because that guy

センラ#215

君のノートを読み返して、パートナーのロブに話した。今の仕事の見方は、リックのフレームワーク——作品は日記の1エントリにすぎない——だ。批判するものはない。その瞬間にできる最善をした。

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#216

その瞬間に、だ。10年前、5年前、今日作っているもの。10年前と同じことはしないかもしれない。それでいい。10年前への後悔はない。そう思っていた。それは本物だ。それぞれの回は本物だ。いつも真実で、永遠に自分である必要はない。その瞬間の自分だ。すごく解放的だ。アーティストにとって助けになる。特に若い頃は、「これがマグナム・オプスで、人生を定義する」と思いがちで、登る山が怖い。でも「今日の1枚で、明日また作る。明日のが今日と同じかもっとよくなるといい」とわかると違う。

今日の真実は何か。よく言うのは、友達に共有したくなるなら——レコードが出るずっと前に、いい趣味の友達に聴かせたくなったら、その時点で出していい。ひとりに共有したいくらい好きなら、たぶんみんなにも準備できている。アーティストは「仲間には聴かせるけど、普通の人が聴く前にもっとよくしないと」と感じがちだけど、それは馬鹿げている。ひとりに共有したいくらい好きになった瞬間、みんなにも準備できている可能性が高い。

---

EN

first of all, like in his book, he describes what it's like to be a heroin addict, which is insane. And the amount which you realize when you read Kitchen Confidential is like the same work ethic he used to score drugs as a junk as a broke junkie. Once he broke that habit, he just applied it to writing and building TV shows. Like his work ethic was the same. He was just directing it at the worst thing possible, being a … heroin addict. And then he directed it in a positive, generative direction, and and he took off. But he said something very similar to you. He's like, "Somewhere deep inside me is this guy that just wants to smoke weed and lay in bed all day." And he goes, "I have to fight His writing's beautiful. He's like, "I have to fight that guy every single day."

センラ#217

カメラの前でたくさんのミュージシャンやアーティストと話している。Josh Kushnerのプロフィールを読み直したばかりで、君に助言を求めに来るところから始まっていた。たくさんの人が助言を求めて来る。君は彼らの前に鏡を掲げて、「自分がやりたいとわかっていることをやれ」と伝えているように見える。自分で思うより、他の人から聞く方が価値がある、みたいに。通じる?

EN

Yeah. What's What's also true, I do have to fight that guy to show up. And there are parts of the job that are just like watching paint dry, waiting for something good to happen. But that moment of magic, when something good does happen, is the thing I'm addicted to. That feeling of it wasn't good. It's not good. Oh my god, it's good. And it's like a miracle because nobody knows how or why that happened. It's not in our control. That's the other thing about it that's really it really is magic. So, I'm addicted to the magic part of it, but I'm not addicted to everything leading up to those magical moments. I'm patient I'm patient enough to wait forever for that thing to happen. But, it's it's not fun. Like some people really look forward to fishing. It's like fishing. It's like you can go out and spend a whole day fishing and not catch any fish. It's like that. You can work in the studio for a day or for a week and nothing good can happen. That's happens. It's out of our control. But, when the good thing happens, it's like ah, there it is. That's why we're here.

ルービン#218

うん、正しそうだ。誰かが「こんなクレイジーなことを考えている」と来て、「うーん、それはちょっと気になる」と言うこともある。でも多くの場合、希望と夢を共有されたら、それで十分だ。「これが希望と夢。でもこれが怖い、これも怖い」。たいていは希望と夢に行け、と。あっちの心配ごとはどうでもいい。

EN

That fishing analogy is really important to me. I've heard you say this a a few years ago.

センラ#219

怖いものって、何を言われるか、続けられるか、前が成功したあとどうするか?

EN

it's it's the best example.

ルービン#220

何を言われるか。続けられるか。前が成功した、次は何をするか。成功は奇妙なものだ。若くてすぐ成功すると、誰も準備できていない。ぎこちなくて居心地が悪い。欲しいと思っていたものが、思っていたものじゃない。誰も準備していない圧力が来る。人生で良い習慣を学んだ相手も、一夜で有名・成功したことがないから対処法を知らない。多くのアーティストは成功で内破する。

EN

I heard Akon one time describe uh working with Eminem. And he shows up into Detroit and he gives him a call. He's like, "All right, I figure we're going to do a night session, you know, these guys are usually nocturnal." Calls him at like 7:00 p.m. And Em's like, "Yeah, I'll I'll I'll see you tomorrow." And Akon's like, "Tomorrow? Like, what are you talking about?" Shows up and doesn't realize that he treats it like a job. Shows up at 9:00 a.m. Right, he's in the studio writing like you're saying recording verses. I think it's like let's say noon. [clears throat] He literally be in the middle of a verse. He's like, "Oh, I'll be right back. I'm going to take lunch." And he's like, "What?" Goes comes back at 1:00. Goes back to work at 5:00. He's like, "All right, I'll see you the next day." And people like misunderstood what Akon was saying is like he doesn't wait around for inspiration. He shows up every day knowing that if he does the work then it will come.

センラ#221

では、なぜ君は何十年も内破しなかったのか。ジミー・アイオヴィーンが教えてくれたいちばん面白いことのひとつは、一線上のさらに先にいる人の知恵だ。本の知識はある。本にないものを聞きたい。彼は「才能のある天才級の人たちが、内破し、人生を壊し、早死にした」のを見てきた、と。落とし穴を四つ挙げた。ドラッグ、アルコール、女性、誇大妄想。8万人が名前を叫ぶステージに立っていると、だんだん人間じゃなくなる。君は「特別じゃない。才能もない」と言う。僕も「特別じゃない」と思う。1000万の自分、1000万の君が世界にいる。ジミーの視点に欠けているものはある? 才能と成功があって壊した人について。

EN

Yes.

ルービン#222

それが全部だと思う。最後のひとつがたくさんを含んでいる。過信とエゴの仮面が不安を隠している場合と、不安そのもの——本当は同じだ。提示の仕方が二つあるだけ。

EN

It's exactly what you're saying about fishing.

ルービン#223

同じ一夜の成功で、一方は「史上最高だ」と自慢し、一方は「偽物だとばれる」と思う。同じコインの裏表。誇大妄想は不安を隠す勇敢な顔で、本人はほとんど知らない。同じ不均衡の違う側面だ。

EN

Brian Halligan founded HubSpot 20 years ago, and he has this line about AI that I keep thinking about. He said, "Most companies are using AI to make their teams more productive, but the companies that will thrive make the company itself the intelligence." And that is exactly what HubSpot does. HubSpot gives you AI that works. AI that actually knows your customers and your business. Your AI needs to know what you know, your actual customer conversations, your sales history, what worked last quarter and what didn't. HubSpot connects AI to your real customer data. So, when it writes an email, it knows this customer asked about pricing 3 weeks ago, it knows what campaign brought them in, and it knows [music] that they already contacted support twice this month. And that's when you start seeing actual results. Visit hubspot.com [music] to learn more. That's hubspot.com.

センラ#224

それが、長い期間成功を持続させるには? という問いにつながる。

EN

You got me into Johnny Cash, who is a couple generations before me. And not only was the music great, but I loved you describing like the what went into making it. We talked about that, but there was something like a the way we like uh distill down what you were saying is like constraints are actually your friend.

ルービン#225

若い頃に瞑想を学んで、ずっと地に足があったことと、「自分ではない」と知っていること。その二つ。地に足があって、起きている魔法に参加できているのは幸運だと知っている。部屋にいられる。でも自分からではない。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#226

自分からじゃない、って——導管みたいな?

EN

If you don't like you can't do everything. So, if you if you artificially constrain yourself, you can you it forces you to be more creative. Can you talk about this? I I feel like you've used this a bunch in your career.

ルービン#227

うん、そう言える。それに仕えている。起きること許す舞台を整えることに献身している。来るのを待つ忍耐がある。「すごい仕事をした」じゃない。

EN

Yeah, it's like the idea of creating a palette. And the albums that speak to me most are ones when you hear them, you know if an if an artist has 20 albums, but you hear a song, you know, oh, that has to be on that album, that seventh album, because that's the only album that sounds like that. Even though the band always sounds like the band, this group of songs sounds different than all the rest and it and it may be that this it was either recorded in a different way or all the songs are about a particular thing or they're using different instrumentation than they used to use. I like it when an album like stands alone outside of an artist's career as a defining moment in time. It's not just more of the same.

センラ#228

長く偉大さを持続する人は、何かをすごいことをしても月桂冠に休まない。勝ちに眠らない。すごいものを作って、よし、翌日またやる。ジミー・アイオヴィーンの言葉で、「トロフィー・ルームにバックミラーはない」。過去じゃなく、今やっている未来を話したい。ジェフリー・カッツェンバーグとランチしたときも同じだった。ディズニーの話じゃなく、今やっていることを。現在にいること、プレゼンス。

長く続く成功について、長いファンとして君をこう解釈している——違うと言ってほしい——ジェームズ・ダイソンと話した。掃除機の人。初めての自伝が大好きで、苦闘に耐えてやめない話だ。発明に取り憑かれて、会社を作りながら偉大な発明の百科事典まで書いている。駆動していたものを理解していなかった。彼のシンプルな組織原理は、「製品を手に取って、どうすればもっとよくできるか。よくして置く。少し待ってまた手に取って、どうすればもっとよくできるか。50年それを繰り返してきた」と。

EN

But how is that tied to these these constraints that you put on the work?

ルービン#229

うん。

EN

Yeah, that happens by coming up with like uh a series of rules that only apply to this project. Those are the constraints. So that could be

センラ#230

君の組織原理を推測するなら、自分自身が好きなものを作ること。それが長く続く成功にも効いている。

EN

And in Johnny Cash example

ルービン#231

それがそれだ。友達の家に行って、「この家具の配置は最良じゃないな。並べ替えよう」と思うこともある。

EN

case with the first one was I didn't know that it was going to be a an acoustic album which it turned out to be. Um but that was something that through the process of recording I learned the most interesting version of this to me is when he's singing alone which is really the demos in my living room, him singing me songs. That sounded better than when we went into the recording studio with musicians and played them with the band. It wasn't as interesting. I didn't know that in advance. That wasn't a premeditated idea. And then in terms of the material that he would sing I grew up with this image what what spoke to me about Johnny Cash was this image of the man in black. And the man in black is a mythical character. Yes, it's Johnny Cash but it's not just Johnny Cash. It's like the mythical Johnny Cash, the Johnny Cash who's the man in black. And the man Johnny Cash could sing a funny song. The man in black probably wouldn't sing a funny song. So the material that we picked was always through the eyes of what's something that man in black the legendary mythological character, What would he sing? And those are the songs that we chose.

センラ#232

本当にやるの?

EN

And so in this case, the constraints are you, Johnny, a guitar. I I think he said he didn't even use a pick. Yeah. It was like his fingers. Every Every guitar Every time he strummed the guitar was his fingers.

ルービン#233

やったことがある。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#234

友達は何て?

EN

And you guys in the house.

ルービン#235

場合による。クールな人もいれば、「あいつはクレイジー」の人もいる。可能性が見える、というだけだ。ゼロから家を設計するのは気が遠くなる。選択肢が多すぎる。でもすでに存在する家なら、「この既存のものの最良のバージョンは何か」が見えることがある。音楽も同じ。そこにあるものを聴いて、最良のバージョンは何か。どうすればもっとよくできるか。ジェームズ・ダイソンとまったく同じ。

EN

Yeah. But but a big part of it, too, was the choice of material. That's a big part of it for for those albums.

センラ#236

最初からそうだったよね。クラブに取り憑かれて通って、ヒップホップ・クラブは最高なのに、レコード店で買うものは好きじゃない。

EN

And it's looked at through the viewpoint of not a funny song, but a man in black wearing

ルービン#237

うん。だから「自分が本当に好きなものを作ろう」と思った。結果的にすばらしくうまくいった。

EN

even just a Not even just a funny song. It had to have a certain amount of gravitas to fit the a mythical character singing it.

センラ#238

でも事前にはすばらしくうまくいくとは知らなかった。聴きたいものを、自分のために作った。

EN

So when I think about everything I've read about you and all as much as I've heard you speak, it's like I feel like you would agree with the statement that like great things can't be made by committee.

センラ#239

こういう人がいちばん好きだ。なぜそれをやっているか、に戻る。世界にそれが欲しくて、夜に音楽を作って昼間は普通の仕事をする覚悟があった。

EN

In many cases, it's just it it can be a band.

ルービン#240

絶対に。これを仕事だと思ったことは一度もない。仕事になるのは、現れると約束したからだけだ。それが仕事にする。ものを作るクラフト自体が好きなことだ。

EN

to water it down. Is it Is So this is the case in companies since obviously I my my main focus is on entrepreneurship.

センラ#241

ミュージシャンとの仕事もポッドキャストもやめて消えるには、何が起きる必要がある?

EN

Yeah.

ルービン#242

自分のために作り続けると思う。本で出した例で、誰も訪ねて来られない山の頂上の家に移って、いちばん時間を過ごしたい場所にして、自分の趣味で本当にキュレートする——それが仕事だ。誰かに見せびらかすために作るんじゃない。住みたいから作る。聴きたい音楽を作る。でもおかしなことに、作っているあいだに何千回も聴くから、終わったら二度と聴かなくてもいい。自分が関わった音楽はかけない。聴きたい完璧なバージョンを作っているのに、プロセスのリスニングが多すぎて、自分にはもう新しくない。新しいものが聴きたい。

EN

It's like even if there's a group, there's usually like a main person. Is that the same thing in bands? Is there always like one chief like There might be four guys in the band or five guys in the band. Is it usually the stronger personality that has more influence?

センラ#243

本の山の家の例——誰にも見られない家——の思考をもう少し。

EN

band, what makes a band great is how the different musicians hear music and play together. And it doesn't have to be a single point of view. The Beatles are a great example because John and Paul really were very different people and wrote different kinds of songs and approached music in different ways. Jagger and Richards, same. There's opposition there. That's goes against exactly what you said. It's a different model. But then like in company and the Heartbreakers, Tom Petty is really the the flag bearer of the band and everyone lines up behind Tom. They're all great and they all can play great things and they all add incredible things. But Tom is sort of the final word in what happens in that band. In a band like U2, it's democratic. Everybody in the band has to like it. If three of the guys like it and one of the guys doesn't, it doesn't happen. And that's another model that that works for them.

ルービン#244

自分にとって本当だからだ。家を飾るのは誰かを感心させるためじゃない。住みたい家の最良のバージョンにするためで、典型的じゃない。住みたいものにするために極端に行く覚悟がある。他の誰のためでもなく、自分のためだ。でも人が来ると、「こんな場所に住みたい。こんな場所に来たことがない」と言われることが多い。

EN

So if we go back to this

センラ#245

その比喩は、まだ人生の仕事を見つけていない人への地図にも近い。「すでにやっていることは何か」「何があってもやめないことは何か」。

EN

designing in constraints, your work with Johnny Cash is very simple. Go back all the way 40 years before that. I'm reducing, I'm not producing. I think in 2023 I listened to, I don't know, 600 to 700 individual, probably listened to two or three podcast episodes a day. So, I don't know, 700, 900 episodes. I think the single best podcast episode that I listened to all that year was your episode on Tetragrammaton with Jimmy Iovine. There was a story that you told in there that was very fascinating cuz Jimmy's like, I think 10 years older than you. Kind of like 10 years.

ルービン#246

うん。

EN

Almost exactly 10 years older. We're we're day we're our birthdays are a day apart.

センラ#247

いつも言うのは、「好きなことをしているなら、無料でもやるだろう」——いや、もう一段ある。本当に好きなことをしているなら、やめるためにお金を払われてもやめない。

EN

Yeah. And you you tell this phenomenal story on the podcast of one of the first that maybe even the first time you met Jimmy Iovine. He said something that was so strange. You go to play something you're working on. And he goes, I wish I could still make something that simple.

ルービン#248

うん。

EN

Yeah.

センラ#249

人生の仕事を見つけるための、すごくいい助言だと思う。リック、最高だった。大きなインスピレーションだ。君のアイデアを仕事にたくさん使ってきた。これが最初の会話で、たくさん続くことを願っている。

EN

And your response was, I'm sure you can.

ルービン#250

素晴らしい。喜びだ。

EN

Yeah, what do you mean? Yeah, because he he was a producer. And as you learn more of what you can do, you tend to do that. You tend to they tend to get bigger. At that point time I hadn't done it enough. It was my first record, so it was that was the the Cult Electric was my first rock record. No. No. Same. Like same time. Yeah, this is like 19 No, this is still in New York. I'm still living in the dorm. I'm still living in the dorm at NYU. Yeah. Yeah, I was doing what I was very simple, but I stayed true to that as much as I can. There probably been a couple of examples along the way where I may have uh I may have not stayed true. Very few. If you look at my whole recorded discography, there may be two or three examples where it got out of control, or where the artist that I'm working with just had a very different vision, which does happen sometimes, and usually we end up not working together again. And there've been one or two occasions where we end up not even finishing a work because it's just too We just see it in a different way. I had that experience with Joe Cocker. We went into the studio to to record, and I had a specific vision of how I saw Joe Cocker, and what I thought was great about Joe Cocker, and he really had a vision of it being something different than that, we weren't on the same page, and it didn't jive. So, it never happened. He's got good taste, and he's got a great work ethic. Those are the two. He said something really interesting that I thought really summed it up, which was Jimmy is in the banking business. These are his words. He said, "I'm in the banking business and you're in the church business." And that's the difference. He said, "I'm doing uh a passion and belief." And he's doing a bottom line, what's going to work, what's going to be good for business. And it's just two different thing, two different mentalities. [laughter] And then Tom goes, "I've never heard somebody describe music that way." It's going to buy me a house. There's a bunch of stories that Jimmy tells in that podcast with you about the crazy things that you see in the music business, you know, where I think he tells the story like the Phil Spector coming to the studio with like a butcher's in a butcher's outfit and he's got like guns strapped to him everywhere and David Geffen's in the studio and John Lennon's getting drunk. Do you have any like things that stand out from you? I've never heard you here tell any of these like stories of stuff you've seen inside studio. What was his reputation for you to do this, though? Violence? Yeah. We mentioned Toby Luke earlier and in the conversation I had with him that was very fascinating, he said something where he's like, "There's not like one right way to do things. There's probably a hundred." And which I think you would agree with. And he's like, "You just have to find the one that fits best for you. And just do that." And you would think this like computer German computer programmer engineer would be like very rigid, but when you talk to him, he essentially just runs his life by all intuition. You are all intuition. Like explain what like why you you essentially it your entire life is just it's in my opinion, like managed or or run by just intu- intuitive feelings. Is this your guided by intuition tied to I feel you have a skepticism of human knowledge. I think you say like I think we know very little about everything. Uh Thomas Edison has this famous quote where he's like we don't know 1/1000% of anything. Yeah, so if you believe you don't know anything, then what is the only other thing you could do is be guided by your intuition. I found one of my all-time favorite quotes when I was reading the book Zero to One. The quote says, "The single most powerful pattern I have noticed is that successful [music] people find value in unexpected places and they do this by thinking about business [music] from first principles instead of formulas." That is exactly what AppLovin has done with their advertising platform [music] platform Axon. Axon connects you with over a billion potential new customers [music] inside mobile games. Axon allows you to capture undivided attention. Axon ads are full-screen video ads that are watched for an average of 35 seconds. [music] That is retention that blows other ad platforms out of the water. You can launch on Axon in minutes. You set the goal and Axon achieves it. There's no complex setup, no expertise needed, and Axon scales [music] quickly. They can put your ads in front of over a billion potential customers. Other businesses have seen immediate results, have scaled [music] to hundreds of thousands of dollars of spend per day, and increased their revenue by millions. So, you want to get started quickly before all your competitors are on Axon, and you can do that by going to [music] axon.ai/sendra. That is axon.ai/sendra. Yeah. Yeah. M is much more um well, he writes down the lyrics and he's really studious in the way that he works. And he'll also record take after take after take after it's written and try different things. Jay's much more spontaneous. It all happens in his head and then he'll get up and say it once or twice and that's it. M is totally involved in every aspect of everything and Jay is like play me a bunch of stuff. If I hear something I like, I'll think about it and if not, I'll see you tomorrow. It's like Jay will only be there when he needs to be there and if you hear something that sparks an idea, he'll sit and just say play it over and over again. Play the music over and over again and he sits in the back and you almost it's it goes on long enough where you forget he's even there because he's just silent in the corner listening, sitting on a couch listening over and over again. 30 minutes, 25 minutes later it was like, I got it. Jumps up. He runs into the room. Hit record and he does the whole thing just from his head. It's amazing. He's the only person I've ever seen do that. Most of his albums were made very quickly. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Some of them it all happens in in the whole thing. Yeah. Yes. Very different. Just two different styles. Both amazing. But they just come at it from different I I think it's just different personality types. I would describe him as obsessive. You know, he's really perfectionist. Uh willing to do whatever it takes for it to be great. diligent, hardworking. And Jay's much more relaxed. Jay's It just kind of happens for him. He's doing it. But it's just a different style. I do a different thing, so it's hard to say. What I do changes according to who I'm working with. Like whatever whatever the artist needs is what my job is. So, in some cases, it's totally hands-off. And some cases, it's well, we got to start from the beginning and try to figure this out together. Yes. I'd say that's that's accurate. I don't know if I do. I don't know if anyone produces me. Yeah. I don't know. I Luckily, I have friends who um friends and family who are not particularly interested in what I do. So, I have reality around me a lot of just like, "That's crazy. Don't You know?" Like a lot of "That's a bad idea." And And it's interesting for me because some ideas I hear, "That's a bad idea." It's like, "Okay, maybe you're right." And so And many ideas is like "I'll show you. I'll show you it's a good idea." I'm I'm I feel I have to do this, you know? I won't change my mind. But I'm open to hearing ideas and definitely open to help if If someone suggests something that makes it better and I see that, it's like that's the best. I'm not closed-minded because someone offers information, even experienced wisdom. I might not always choose to use that information. I don't think so. I have a lot of self-confidence. I think that's the mix That's the mix. I think, you know, I was lucky I learned to meditate when I was young and meditation's been a big part of my life. So, it it's never been about ego. It's never been about me, you know? It's It's uh I'm confident in being able to share what I'm experiencing. I hear something like "That's amazing." And I hear something else is like, "You know, it's not good enough." And nothing anyone can say will tell me otherwise. So, like I I know I can feel it. when I say confidence in my own judgment this is how I see it. I'm not saying I'm right. I never say I'm right or I know what's best. None of those things. This is how I see it. I see it clearly. This is how I would vote for it. If I get to vote, I vote for this. But it's not my way or the highway at all. Depends. Like the I would say rarely critical. What it usually is it starts apprehensive. When we start, because it could be anything. So, at first, it's scary. So, I don't know what's going to happen. So, you would say you don't have an you're a a a So, like a self-critical inner monologue constantly playing in your mind. It's interesting. The reason I asked this question is because um I was with a a an entrepreneur I met yesterday. Guy's worth $10 billion and he wakes up every morning at 5:30 just assuming he's going out of business and like it's actually paranoid. He lives like a paranoid life and that's why he thinks he's good. This is very common with like a lot of people. And um I used to have a self-critical, like kind of mean I was … pretty mean to myself. I was getting Brad Jacobs uh actually had him on the show. His I've talked to him a bunch. And he used to have that, too. And now he's in the '60s of like it's counterproductive. It's not helping anything. And some something I talked about this on the podcast. You can hear me mentioning it over and over again for a few years. It's just something one day just … snapped. And I just don't do that anymore. And I went back and I was reading my notes on you, and I was just telling my partner Rob about this. This is the way I look at the work we're doing now. It's like I like Rick's framework that like you look at your work it's just like an entry to a diary. It's like there's nothing to be critical about because like you did the best you possibly could have done. Yeah. And I might not do the same thing I would have done 10 years ago, and that's fine. But I don't have any regrets about 10 years ago, that's what I thought. That's real. Each each of those installments are real. So it's always true. It doesn't mean that's who you are forever. That's who you are in that moment. It's really freeing. It's helpful for an artist to think that way. Cuz usually, especially when we're younger, we think the thing that we make is this is my this is my magnum magnum opus, and this is going to define me for the rest of my life. And it's a daunting hill to climb. But when you realize it's like this is just the one today, and we're going to make another one tomorrow. And hopefully the one tomorrow's going to be as good or better than the one today. What's true today? What's the one I I usually say that if you are excited to share it with your friend, like if if if I'm working in studio and before you know, long before record comes out, if when making something and if someone comes and I'm excited to play it for my friend who has good taste and who likes good music, it could come out then. Like if if I want to play it for for them, that's good enough for everybody. Do you know what I'm saying? But we But usually artists will feel like, "Well, I'll play this for my boys, but it has to be a lot better before regular people can hear it." And that's ridiculous. It's like as soon as I liked it enough to share it with one person, chances are it's ready for everybody. Yeah, that sounds right. I mean, there are occasions where someone will come to me and say, "I'm thinking about doing this crazy thing." And I'll say, "Hmm, I would have wondered about that." But more often than not, when people share their hopes and dreams, that's all you need to know. It's like, "These are my hopes and dreams, but I'm afraid of this, this, and this." Mo- Most often it's go with the hopes and dreams. Don't worry about any of that stuff, cuz that stuff doesn't matter. What someone's going to say. Uh will I be able to keep doing it? Uh my last one was successful, what do I do now? Success is a funny thing, you know, when you're young and you get successful quickly, no one's prepared for that. And it's awkward and uncomfortable. And you think that's the thing that you want, but when you get it, it's not like what you think it is. It's very different. And there are all these uh pressures that come with it that no one's ready for and no one learns how to do. And it's not like whoever uh you learn good habits from over the course of your life, they don't know how to deal with it because they're they never got, you know, overnight famous or successful or like it's it's a weird thing. Um [clears throat] so a lot of artists kind of implode in success. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think those are all of them. That it's like because the last one takes into account a lot of like there's both the the mask of overconfidence and ego which is hiding insecurity or there's the insecurity but they're they're really the same. You know, they're just presenting in two different ways. have the same overnight success. One of them gets really boastful and I'm the greatest that ever lived and the other one is like oh my god, they're going to find out that I'm not it's that I'm really a fake. But those are both the same people it's they're two sides of the same coin. The the megalomaniac is a way of hiding the insecurity. It's a it's a brave face. They might not know this. They rarely know it, you know. It's different sides of the same imbalance. I think the fact that I learned to meditate when I was young and always had a uh a a grounded and and I and the fact that I know it's not me. That's it's like those two things like I'm grounded and I know I'm lucky to participate in this magic that's happening. I get to be in the room when it happens. But it's not from me. Yeah, I would say that. I'm in the service of it. I'm devoted to setting the stage to allow it to happen. And I'm patient in waiting for it to come. It's not like when it's great, it's like I did a great job. It's not that. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. That's it. And sometimes I'll go into a friend's house and I'll think hmm, the furniture in here isn't arranged in the best way. Maybe I'll rearrange the furniture. I've done that. I've done that. Depends. Some of them, you know, some are cool with it. Some are like, he's crazy, you know. Well, it's just like seeing the possibility. Um I've I've worked on a lot of um a lot of living spaces and the idea of designing a house from scratch is a daunting one to me. I can't imagine doing that. Cuz too many options. But if there's a house that exists, I might be able to see well, what's the best version of this thing that already exists. And that's what same same with music. It's like I hear what's there and now what's the best version of this? What can we do to make it better? What can we do to make it better? Same thing as James Dyson. Exactly the same. Yeah. Yeah, so I was like, why don't I just make what I actually like? And it wound up working out like fabulously. Which these are my favorite kind of people because you're Again, it goes back to like why are you doing what you're doing? And you're doing it because you wanted to make it to the point where You were willing to just make music at night and have a normal job just because you like doing it. What would have to happen for you to basically disappear and to not and to stop stop working with musicians, stop making podcasts? This idea of the you the example that you use in the book of the house on the mountain that no one can ever see no one will ever see. Say more about the thinking behind that though. I think the metaphor that you're using there though is like almost like a a map for people to find their life's work if they haven't found it yet. It's like, "What are you already doing?" And what will you And what will you do no matter what? What won't you stop doing regardless? Yeah. Great. Pleasure.

センラ#251

ありがとう。

---

EN

Explain why he said that. And what's happening? What happens over time? [laughter] This is after almost a decade in hip-hop or half a decade in hip-hop? No? When was this? Oh, okay, Okay. Is this when you moved to California? Oh, … Okay, so give me this I thought this is Okay, so this is the very beginning. So, it's as simple as it gets because that's all you can do. I'm curious your perspective since you've known Jimmy Iovine for so long, because he has a very another singular career where he like kind of in music the whole time, but jumped around. Yeah, different job from, you know, engineer to producer to record company uh uh owner to then building businesses with his his artists. Like, what do you think is special about him? Like, what's unique about him? Why was he able to do what he was able to do? To me, in my mind, you two are very almost Before this conversation I'm having with you, almost at opposite ends of the spectrum, where I felt like you were just like drawn, you know, like a moth to a flame about what you want to do, where he's like it was always work. I never liked it. It was always a job. Like, I like certain parts of it, but I just he essentially just forced himself to do it. Explain that. I love this. There's a great line in The Defiant Ones where T hears he's producing Tom Petty and he hears uh a song he goes, "This is house music." And Tom goes, "What do you mean?" He goes, he goes, "Find me, you know, whatever, it's eight more albums." He goes, "That song's going to buy you a house." Yeah, so that it's We have a different We have a We're different in that way. Yeah. I can remember doing a session with ODB, Ol' Dirty Bastard from from Wu-Tang. And I remember being nervous cuz I'd never met him before and his reputation preceded him. So, I didn't really know what I was going into. And and I thought I'm going to I'm going to bring my dog. I had a Puli, which is a dog that has dreadlocks. I'll be And that would be dis- Whatever's going if you see a dog with dreadlocks, it's interesting. Like it it it doesn't it's fascinating in its own way. And I had a friend of mine also filming everything cuz I thought, well, if there's a camera and if there's a dog, it's going to be okay. All kinds of crazy things. Like Could be violence, could be a lot of things that would not be good. And there's things that I wasn't really prepared for, but I loved him. You know, I was a fan. And I remember we walked in and he looked and he pointed at the dog and he said, "He's okay." And then he pointed at the camera, "He's got to go." So I okay. And then he went and then the session ended up going pretty well. Yes. Yeah. All intuition. Yeah. I've always been intuitive what I feel and it's worked out. I suppose if it didn't work out, then maybe I would have to try something else, but it's the fact that I've stayed true to what feels right to me and luckily, by the grace of God, it has resonated with other people, it allows me to continue doing it. But I suppose if that didn't happen, I would just make things for myself on a small level and keep doing it and have a real job. Yeah. Yeah, I believe that. I believe we don't know anything. Yeah, and and to try things and see what works. And and just because one thing works doesn't mean that's the way that that's the way it happens. That's a way that happened to work in that case. I I heard you um one time comparing contrast the the uh approach of Jay-Z to Eminem. You work with both of them. Can you talk about just how different they are? What's the energy when you're in the room with both of them though? Yeah, I think a lot of people know that he did Magna Carta Holy Grail essentially in two weeks. Like he did the whole album in two weeks. Yeah, it was always interesting because like yeah, he recorded them in two weeks, but these ideas he's been refining. It's not like when he's out of the studio, he's not thinking about them. He's like refining these ideas over a long period of time. That's crazy. As opposed to M who will work on a song forever. What do you think M's personality type is then? Of the two, which one do you think your your working style is closer to? Oh, so you know what? I just I'm thinking of it like it's kind of tied to what you were saying about being a professional listener, that you take it serious interest in the person, whether you're recording a podcast with them or you're working with them in the studio. And so, your goal, if I'm reading this correctly, is like has really nothing to do with you. You you feel you're act of service to try to get them to be the best version of themselves. Is that the way you think about it? Do you have anybody that plays that role in your life for you? Could they reduce you? I don't know if there's anything to reduce here. Mhm. Yeah, I could see that you take a lot of input, but I think you would be resistant to Do you think you have a big ego? You have a lot of self-confidence, though. But they even said I met Somebody met you when they were like 19 and they're like, "That's the most confident self-confident 19-year-old I've ever met." So, there's confidence in your own judgment cuz you were just saying you could have somebody who has a lot of wisdom. What is your inner monologue like when you're making something? Is it positive, negative, are you self-critical? Even today. And there's usually expectation because I've had success in the past that if I'm there it's going to be great. So, I feel this pressure of like there's expectation. And I know I can't control anything. It's going to be the way it's going to be. I know I'm patient and I know I'll wait until it's great. And we start by experimenting and see what it could be. And as soon as there's a glimmer, as soon as I hear something that's good, then I relax. But until then, it's too open. You know, it could be too many things. But once something lands, whatever it is, I relax. Like, okay, we have a at least a direction to move in. It doesn't mean we stay in that direction forever. But having a direction is better than not having a direction. And when we start, we don't have a direction. Never. Yeah. That's great. Yeah. In that moment. And then that was 10 years ago, and that was 5 years ago, and then what we're making today is I've seen you talk to a ton of musicians and artists on camera. Uh I just fini- finished rereading this profile of uh that was in Cost magazine on Josh Kushner and it starts out with him coming to seek your counsel. There's a ton of people that come to seek your counsel. And I feel almost like you're hold up like your motorcycle diaries like holding up a mirror to them and just telling them to do what they know they want to do, but it's somehow more valuable if they hear it from somebody else. Does that make any sense to you? Do you resonate with that at all? the stuff that they're afraid of over here? Okay, so I want to ask you why you have not imploded over this this this many decades. One of the most interesting things uh that Jimmy Iovine told me, we talked a lot about this because like I'm obsessed with people that are just further down the line than I am. Cuz it's like it's just the the the wisdom they gain from experience. Like I'll read I I got the book knowledge. I need like the stuff that's not in there that they can like tell you. And he was just like most people cannot handle, you know, you guys have been around some of the most talented people. Genius-level talents that have completely imploded, maybe destroyed their lives, maybe died prematurely. And so he broke it down like four things for me. It's like there's like people can't handle success and these are the pitfalls, David, that you should watch out for. One was drugs. Second was alcohol. Third was women. And fourth was megalomania. That, you know, it's really hard to get on stage and there's 80,000 people screaming your name. And over time they just think they're some kind of like they're not even human anymore, which you seem to be like, "I'm not special. I have no I know you say you have no talent and all this other shit." But like I don't I'm not special. I you know, I I think that's there's a lot of wisdom to that. It's like, "Man, there's 10 million me's and 10 million of you's Did you all over the world or whatever that you was? Do you think Jimmy's perspective on that is like the people that you've seen that were had talent and had success and then destroyed it. Is there anything else that he's missing from there? Two different people So that leads me to the the question I hinted at or maybe even said like how do you sustain success success over such a long period of time then? What do you mean it's not from you? You're like a conduit? Is that what you mean? No, I think the people that sustain greatness over time, even if they do something great, they don't like rest on their laurels. They don't go to sleep on wins. They just make something great like, all right, you try to do it again the next day. And they don't really think too much Jimmy Iovine has I keep bringing him up, but he has a great line where he's like, I don't have a rearview mirror in my trophy room. He's just like, I don't give a even when he did the show, it's like, I don't want to talk about the past. I want to talk about like what I'm working on in the future. They're all like that. I just had lunch with Jeffrey Katzenberg. Same thing. He's just like, yeah, we do the show, but like I want to talk about what I'm working on now, not just what happened at Disney and and everything else. It's just a very very common. Uh like staying in the moment, being present. I Let me tell me if you disagree with me uh cuz again, like I have this interpretation of you in my mind cuz I've been a fan of yours for a very long time. And going back to this like sustained success over a long period of time, I talked to James Dyson, the guy that invented, you know, the the vacuum cleaner guy. And he's a fascinating person to me. Number one person I wanted to meet because his first autobiography I think is so great cuz it's all about like him just enduring through struggle and refuse to quit. And something I didn't understand even though I read his first autobiography five times, second autobiography two or three times, and his encyclopedia he wrote encyclopedia This I love obsessed people. He's an inventor. He wrote an encyclopedia while he's building his company on a history of great inventions. And he's It's like … 200 inventions there. He's like, look at this little weird thing. And he's like complete obsessed obsessed. But what I didn't understand what was driving him was he told me this great story on the podcast where he he goes, this is his or his simple organizing principle. He's like, I pick up a product, right? Cup. Pick up product. And he says, I go, how can I make this product better? Makes it better, puts it back down. Waits a little bit, picks it up, goes, how can I make it better? Makes it better, puts it back down. He goes, I just do that over and over again. I've been doing it for 50 years. So, if I had to guess what your organizing principle was that I think also influences the sustained success that you had is you just making things that you yourself like. No, you don't. [laughter] What did your friend say? Okay, we could say more about this. Like Yeah, I feel like you did this from the very from the jump when you're like, well, I'm in the club. I'm obsessed going to the club. The hip-hop club's incredible, right? But I like this stuff that's here. I go to the record store. I'm buying this stuff that I don't like. Yeah. But again, I didn't know in advance it would work out fabulously. It's just like this is what I want to hear. I'm making it for me. it in the world. Absolutely. It was never I never thought of any of this as a job. It's never been about that. It's only a job because I'm committed to show up. That's what makes it a job. The actual craft of making things is what I like to do. I think I would just keep making things for myself. You know, I give the example in the book of if you were to move into a house on the top of a mountain that no one could ever come and visit. And you made that the place that you most wanted to spend your time and you really create curated it to your taste. That's the job. It's not about I'm making this to show off to someone else. I'm making this because I want to inhabit this. I make the music that I want to I'm excited to listen to. Now, it's ridiculous it doesn't work out that way because in making the music we work on it we listen to it a thousand times and then when it's done I it's fine if I never hear it again. I never put on music I worked on which is funny because I'm making it to be the perfect version of what I want to hear. But in the process of doing that there's so much listening involved that's not fun to go back and listen to it for me. I want to hear something new. Well, it's it's true I just know for me if I was I don't decorate my home for to impress someone else. I decorate my home to be the best version of the house that I want to live in and it's not typical. I'm willing to go to extremes to make the thing that I want to inhabit. And it's not for anyone else, it's just for me. Now, often other people, if they do happen to come over, they're like, "Wow, I'd love to live in a place like this. I've never been in a place like this." Yeah. I always say it's like people say, "Oh, you know, if you love what you do, you would do for free." I was like, "No, there's another level to loving what you're doing. If you love If you truly love what you do, they couldn't pay you to stop." I think it's excellent advice for for helping people find their life's work. Rick, this is awesome. You're going to huge inspiration to me. Uh I've used a ton of your ideas in my work and I hope this is the first conversation of many between you and you. Thanks for goodness. Thank I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast Founders. For almost a decade, I have obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

FAQ

A. 英語原文・自動字幕について

### なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは? このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。 公式サイト(davidsenra.com)にはエピソード要約はありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは公開されていませんでした。 参照: https://www.davidsenra.com / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6MEDOY7tHo

### 自動字幕の精度はどれくらい? どこが壊れやすい? 一般に YouTube 自動字幕の精度は条件で大きく変わります。 - 古めの報告では英語でも おおよそ60–70% と言われることも多い - 2020年代の測定では、条件が良いと 85–95% 前後まで上がる例もある - それでも アクセント・早口・専門用語・固有名詞・複数話者 で一気に落ちる

このエピソードはインタビュー(2人会話)で比較的クリアですが、アーティスト名・レーベル名・アルバム名・音楽用語が多いので、名前の誤変換が起きやすいタイプの音声です。

### この記事の英語で実際に見つかった誤変換・揺れは? 自動字幕原文に出てきた典型例です(日本語本文側では多くを修正済み)。

| 字幕に出た表記 | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | Reduced by / produced by の混線 | 「Reduced by Rick Rubin」(本人の意図的な表記) | | Deaf Jam | Def Jam | | T La Rock / It's Yours | T La Rock『It's Yours』 | | ODB / Ol' Dirty Bastard | Ol' Dirty Bastard(Wu-Tang) | | Puli(犬種) | Puli(プーリー:ドレッド状の被毛の犬) | | Tetragrammaton | Tetragrammaton(ルービンのポッドキャスト) | | Broken Record | Broken Record(同上・初期の音楽インタビュー番組) | | Shangri-La | Shangri-La Studios(マラブのスタジオ) | | Toby Lutke / Luke | Tobi Lütke(Shopify) | | Jimmy Iovine | Jimmy Iovine(ジミー・アイオヴィーン) | | The Cult Electric | The Cult『Electric』 | | Magna Carta Holy Grail | Magna Carta Holy Grail(Jay-Z) | | Cost magazine / Josh Kushner | Costco Connection 等ではなく、報道プロファイル(Josh Kushner) | | Man in black | Man in Black(Johnny Cash の神話的イメージ) |

つまり英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、学習用の対照テキストとしては有用でも、引用の一次ソースとしては動画そのものを優先してください。

### 日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している? 完全対応ではありません。 - 日本語は読みやすさのため発言をまとめ・整文している - 英語は自動字幕の切れ目が多く、発言数が日本語より細かい/混線することもある - ページでは話者(センラ/ルービン)を手がかりに、順番で英語を紐づけている

そのため「この日本語のこの1文 = この英語のこの1文」とは限らず、だいたい同じ話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。

### 上部トグル(英語原文 / 少し大きく)は何のため? - 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け。英語は約9.5pxの補助情報 - 英語を少し大きく … 約11px前後。対照しながら精読したいとき用

英語をメインにすると誤変換に引きずられやすいので、デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」にしています。

### スポンサー部分は? 本文から省略しています。音声上は Ramp / Deel / HubSpot / AppLovin(Axon)の読み上げが入っています。

B. 人物・会社・固有名詞

### Rick Rubin / リック・ルービン とは? アメリカの音楽プロデューサー。1980年代にニューヨークで Def Jam Recordings を共同創業し、ヒップホップの商業化とクロスオーバーに大きく関与。その後ロック、カントリー、ポップなどジャンルを横断して活動。スタジオ Shangri-La(カリフォルニア)でも知られる。著書 『The Creative Act: A Way of Being』(創造的行為)。ポッドキャストは Broken RecordTetragrammaton など。

### Def Jam / 『It's Yours』 / LL Cool J - Def Jam … ルービンが寮時代に関わったレーベル。ヒップホップ黎明期の象徴のひとつ。 - T La Rock『It's Yours』 … ルービンが語る「最初にプロデュースしたヒップホップ」。クラブのエネルギーをレコードに残そうとした作品。字幕上「18か月で約10万枚」など。 - LL Cool J … その次に手がけた重要アーティスト。スリーブの 「Reduced by Rick Rubin」 と寮の住所の話は、本人の「削る=リデュース」美学の出発点として語られる。

### Shangri-La マラブ近郊の録音スタジオ/創造空間。エピソードでは「レコードと同じ美意識が空間にもある」世界観の例として出る。

### Johnny Cash / American Recordings(Man in Black) ルービンとジョニー・キャッシュの共作(いわゆる American シリーズの文脈)が語られる。 要点は: - アコースティック/一人で歌うデモの方が、フルバンドのスタジオより「面白い」とプロセスの中で気づいた - 選曲の制約=神話的 Man in Black が歌うに足る重み(gravitas)があるか - ピックではなく指で弾く、など物質的な制約も「パレット」になる

数字・盤面の細部は口頭ベース。ディスコグラフィの正確なクレジットは公式盤面を当たること。

### Eminem と Jay-Z(働き方の対比) ルービン談の整理: - Eminem … ノートに書き、テイクを重ねる。執着的・完璧主義。スキル維持のために曲にならない草稿も大量に書く。 - Jay-Z … 頭の中で組み立て、立ち上がって1〜2回で録る。長時間ループを黙って聴き、「できた」と一気にパフォーマンスする。アルバム制作が速いエピソードも多い(例として Magna Carta Holy Grail が会話に出る)。

どちらが正しいではなく、「人格タイプが違う」という話。

### Jimmy Iovine / 『The Defiant Ones』 音楽エンジニア→プロデューサー→レーベル→Beats など事業まで横断した人物。ルービンとほぼ10歳差・誕生日が1日違い、と会話上で語られる。 有名な対比:「Jimmy は banking business、Rick は church business」(本人談として紹介)。『The Defiant Ones』はアイオヴィーンとドクター・ドレを軸にしたドキュメンタリー。

### The Cult『Electric』 ルービンにとって「最初のロック・レコード」として語られる作品。ジミーが「あんなにシンプルなものがまだ作れたらいいのに」と言った文脈の録音。

### ODB(Ol' Dirty Bastard)とドレッドの犬 Wu-Tang Clan の ODB セッション。評判に緊張し、ドレッドヘアの Puli 犬とカメラを持ち込んだ話。ODB は「犬はOK、カメラは出ていけ」と指示した、とルービンが回想。

### The Strokes / Red Hot Chili Peppers - The Strokes … 会話時点で新作を終えた、とルービン。5人編成の本質を削らない。 - RHCP … 40〜50曲録って A/B/C 投票する「ruthless edit」の具体例。

### Tetragrammaton / Broken Record ルービンがホストのポッドキャスト。Broken Record はミュージシャン中心の時代が長く、Tetragrammaton はより広いゲスト(起業家・思想家など)へ拡張した印象をセンラが語る。

### 『The Creative Act』 ルービンの著作。創造を「特別な才能の独占」ではなく、在り方・注意の向け方として語る本。エピソード終盤の「山の頂上の家」「日記の1エントリ」などの比喩と通底する。

C. 考え方案・用語の意味

### Less is more / 少なくするには多くやる 要素を積むほど一つあたりの重要度が下がる。最小限にするなら厳しくキュレートし、隠れるものがない状態にする。ギターの「壁」ではなく、指の音が聞こえる一本人格、という例。

### Reduced by(プロデュースではなくリデュース) 「produce=積み上げる」イメージに対し、実際の仕事は分解・削減だという若い頃の直感。クレジット表記そのものに思想を埋め込んだ話。

### Ruthless edit(容赦ない編集) 目標が70%でも、いったん40%まで落としてから足す。グループでは民主的投票で「全員が捨てられないもの」から積み上げる。好きな部分を全体のために切る覚悟。

### 制約(constraints)/パレット プロジェクト専用のルールを決める。音作り・題材・楽器・神話的ペルソナ(Man in Black)などが「できること」の枠になり、創造性を強制する。

### プロの聞き手(professional listener) センラの分析:音楽で深く聴く訓練が、ポッドキャストでも機能している。 ルービン側の説明:多くの会話は「自分の番を待つ」だけで、本当に聴く人は稀。判断せず理解し、わからないことはその場で聞く。

### 怠け者のワーカホリック(lazy workaholic) 気質は何もしない側。毎日「行きたくない」を乗り越えて現れる。中毒なのは「魔法が起きた瞬間」であって、そこに至る退屈な待機ではない(釣りの比喩)。

### 魔法の瞬間/守る/イップス 長く「よくない」が続き、突然「いい」が現れる。そのあとは壊さないよう守る。意識しすぎるとゴルフのイップスのように失う。アーティストは「自分がやっていることさえわからない」場所に行く必要がある、という話。ステフ・カリーの「何も考えない」と接続。

### 日記の1エントリ/マグナム・オプスの罠 作品は「永遠の自分の定義」ではなく、その瞬間の最善の記録。10年前の自分に後悔しない。ひとりの信頼できる友人に聴かせたくなったら、だいたい世の中にも出せる。

### 山の頂上の家 誰も来ない家を、自分の趣味だけで最良に整える。見せびらかしではなく「住みたいから作る」。ライフワークの見つけ方としても、「お金をもらわなくてもやる」の一段上——「やめるためにお金を払われてもやめない」——と接続される。

### 成功の落とし穴(ジミー四分類)と持続 ドラッグ/アルコール/女性/誇大妄想。誇大妄想と「バレる恐怖」は同じコイン。 ルービンの持続要因(本人談):若い頃からの瞑想で地に足があること、「自分ではない/導管」と知っていること。

### 直観と「何も知らない」 知識への謙虚さ(エジソン的な「ほとんど知らない」)と、感じたことに忠実であること。うまくいったやり方は「そのケースで効いた一例」にすぎない。

D. エピソードの位置づけ・読み方

### この回の一本線は? 「減らす美学」→ヒップホップ黎明とDef Jam→容赦ない編集と制約→執着(Eminem)と奉仕(アーティストの本質)→プロの聞き手としてのポッドキャスト→怠け者のワーカホリックと魔法→Johnny Cash/Jimmy Iovine→持続する成功と人生の仕事(山の家)。

### 学習用の使い方のおすすめ 1. まず日本語だけ通読(トグルで英語OFF) 2. 気になったブロックだけ英語をONにして語彙を拾う 3. FAQの固有名詞表で名前を固定する 4. 引用するなら動画の該当箇所を優先(ASRは一次ソースにしない)