David Senra · JA + tiny EN

21年の会社づくり——Shopify トビー・ルトケ

Tobi Lütke: 21 Years of Building Shopify

英語はYouTube自動字幕ベース。日本語は学習用の整文対話。一次情報は動画。

センラルトケ
FAQ 一覧 YouTube
センラ#1

いちばん感心していることの一つが、会社を約21年やってきたことだ。長い時間やる人、卓越を追う人、偉大になろうとする人が好きだ。僕の人生は創業者ばかりだ。昼間は歴史上の創業者の伝記を読む——約410冊。夜は創業者と付き合う。起業家以外の友人はほぼいない。そしていちばん尊敬する創業者にいつも聞く——「いちばん尊敬する創業者は誰か」。君の名前が何度も何度も出てくる。会社づくりとマネジメントに非常にユニークな考えがある、と。singular(特異)という言葉もよく使われる。だから会社づくり、プロダクト、テクノロジー、起業の福音をどう広げるか、君の考え方を並べたい。まずは君が言ったことから。「会社そのものがテクノロジーだ」——どういう意味?

EN

One of the things I admire most about you is like you've been running your company for 21 years, something like that. I love people that do things for a long time, people that chase excellence, that try to be great. My entire life is founders, right? So, during the day, I read biographies of historical founders. I've read like 410 of them. And then at night, I hang out with founders. I don't think I have a single friend that's not an entrepreneur. And then I'm always asking the founders I most admire Yeah. who are the founders they most admire. And your goddamn name comes up over and over and over again. And what they talk about is that you have very unique ideas on company building and management. And your they use the word singular a lot. So, I want to kind of like lay out how you think about building companies, building products, building technology, and then, you know, spreading the gospel of of entrepreneurship. I want to start with one thing that you said. You said companies are technologies themselves. What do you mean by that? In a lot of ways, like I mean like take the social angle. Like um a lot of the companies are social technology in in the sense that they allow us to go all in. Like the only time you're really allowed to uh spend eight I I'm going to say eight because that's the right number to say. Really, like … 14 hours a day, right? Um just singularly pursuing a thing is like um I mean we want kids to spend this time in school and that's okay. And then university, you know, dedicate yourself. Um other than that like you can't just like not have a job and but just be like really really into interfaces. It's socially not acceptable. So, like company building turns out to be a perfect excuse. Once you call it a company, it's not like tinkering around anymore with your ideas. And um you get to you get to explore things. What a company fundamentally allows you to do is like just run the counterfactual to the world you see around you, right? Like you you you get to um try to build a thing that you think ought to be there. And um then you means test it against the market. And if if a market uh um agrees with you that this thing need to exist and it it it moves energy in the form of money back to you so you can do more of the thing that you you've been pursuing all along. And not only that, it's like self-financing. Like if you find out like again, I started a company which I didn't think was going to be um uh like have a very very big market. And along the way, it just like the market like pulled Shopify out of the project I started essentially. You know, that's an incredible intelligence to uh to to tap into. So, you put all these things together and um you say like, "Well, look, companies, the concept of companies not that old. It's like um we've been on a 500-year run and sort of kind of extra extracted from things called companies which weren't which were actually more like quasi-governments like the East India Company. And so, um the modern company is not that old. I find that if you take that mindset that like companies are just sort of a path-dependent solution to a social and somewhat legal problems, they allow thousands of people to join the thing your project and um it's called a job and therefore everyone accepts this. Um and uh um uh you you like obviously you can make money, so it's a good deal. And um then um you can figure out if this counterfactual of yours might be correct or needs updating along the way or any of these kind of things. And you get at the end of the day, if you're lucky, you um work with other people who are really all in and like inspiring and like taking it forward and you have a thing. And I just like the whole thing is just like I I just like I marvel at the institution of a company in a way. Like because if it wouldn't exist for some reason and someone would propose a whole idea now, it would something say from first principles, none of this makes sense really.

ルトケ#2

社会的な角度から言うと、会社の多くは社会技術だ。全身全霊で打ち込んでいい唯一の言い訳になる。本当は1日14時間くらい一つのことを追求する、という話だけど、社会的に言えるのは8時間くらいだろう。学校はそれでよくて、大学も専念していい。でも「仕事なしでインターフェースにのめり込む」は社会的に許容されない。だから会社づくりは完璧な言い訳になる。会社と呼んだ瞬間、ただのいじくりではなくなる。探索できる。会社が根本的に許すのは、周りに見える世界に対する反事実(カウンターファクチュアル)を走らせることだ。あるべきだと思うものを試し、市場に当てる。市場が「それが必要だ」と同意すれば、エネルギーの形としての金が戻ってきて、さらに追求できる。しかも自己資金化できる。僕は市場が非常に大きいとは思っていなかった会社を始めた。途中で市場が、始めたプロジェクトからShopifyを引きずり出した。そこに触れる知性はすごい。会社という概念はそんなに古くない。約500年のランで、東インド会社のような準政府に近いものから抽出されてきた。現代の会社は新しい。会社は社会的・法的問題への経路依存的な解決だ、というマインドセットで見ると、何千人もがプロジェクトに参加でき、「仕事」と呼ばれて皆が受け入れる。金も稼げる。反事実が正しいか、更新が要るかもわかる。うまくいけば本気の人たちと働き、何かが残る。会社という制度そのものに驚く。もし存在しなくて、今ゼロから提案されたら、第一原理からはほとんど意味をなさないはずだ。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#3

君が言っていて興味をそそられた。「まだ会社の作り方はわかっていない。すべての会社はひどい。自分のも含めて」。2000億ドル超の会社を回している人が、これから20年後に今を見て恥ずかしい、と言う。なぜ?

EN

Well, I heard you say something that was fascinating really piqued my interest when you're like, "We do not know how to build companies yet. All companies are terrible." Yes. "Including mine." Which you said and you know, that that's hilarious when somebody's you're running a 200 billion-plus dollar company and you think that in the next 20 years we're going to look back at what we were doing at this point and be embarrassed by what we were doing. Why do you think that? Cuz it's like everything else. It I'm sure when you listen to your first podcast, you're like, "Oh my god."

ルトケ#4

ほかのすべてと同じだ。初めてのポッドキャストを聞いたら「なんてことだ」と思うだろ。実際に聞くべきで、いちばん喜ばしい瞬間として見るべきだ。

EN

Please don't. But like it's honestly this should be seen as um the most joyous of the moments. You should actually do it if you haven't done it.

センラ#5

ずっとやってるよ。

EN

No, I I do it all the time.

ルトケ#6

いい。昔と今の差が進歩だ。プログラマとしていつも経験する。古いコードを見て「何してるんだ、抽象化しすぎ、複雑すぎ」と直す。でもある日、古いコードを開いて「すごい」と感心してしまった——人生でいちばん悲しい日の一つだった。進歩していない、という含意が列車のようにぶつかってきた。

EN

Okay, good. Because what you the difference between that and what you would do today is you progress, right? And as a computer programmer, I I experience this all the time. I look at old code and I'm like, "What the hell? Like this is totally wrong. What am I even doing? This is way too abstract and complex." And then I made it better because I now have the skills to do so. And um one of the saddest days of my life was when I opened old code and I was like really impressed with how good it was.

センラ#7

プログラミングの代わりに会社を作ろうとしていた時期か。

EN

[laughter]

ルトケ#8

そう。でも会社づくりはとても似ている。Spotifyのダニエル・エクが君について言っていた。僕は本をたくさん読む。「本を読まなければ一生、読めば千の生」みたいな話をしようとすると——

EN

That's one of the saddest days of

センラ#9

6年前にもこのポッドキャストについてメモを取っていた。初めて会うわけじゃない。君は「本は現実のチートコードにいちばん近い。誰かのキャリア全体の学びを数時間で得られる」と言っていた。

EN

Really really saddest day of my life because I'm like, "Holy … the implication of this just hit me like a like a train, right? Like um There you are progressing. You want to

ルトケ#10

その通りだ。もっと屋上から叫びたい。奇妙なトリックは「本を読め」だ。ジャンルを3冊に1冊くらいは変えて、引き出しの幅を作る。プログラマからビジネスへ急いで学ぶとき、ビジネス書の質にすぐがっかりした。率直に言って、時間がある人が書いていて、実際に会社を作った人ではないことが多い。行間も読む。書いた人がセールスなら問題は全部セールスで解け、マーケならマーケで解ける。少なくともその罠には落ちないと学べる。だからエンジニア型創業者としてすべてをエンジニアリング問題と見ない、と決めた。それが能力の上限になる盲点だから。IPO後、本気の上場企業CEOにならねば、とチームの組み方、委譲、事業線の整理を学ぼうとした——それが会社をほぼ殺しかけた。救ったのはCOVIDだった。

EN

Exactly. It figures because I was programming all day. I was like I was trying to, you know, uh build a company instead. Um which honestly is very very similar. This is one of the things Daniel Ek told me about you. Yeah. Here's what I'm observing. Like you, I I read a lot of books. I I I I try to figure out um like you know, I think uh someone uh like if you don't read books, you live a lifetime. If you read books, you live a thousand, right? Um so, it's I'm going to interrupt you real quick because I took notes on this podcast six years ago. This isn't the first time I came across you. And you said uh books are the closest thing you'll ever come to finding cheat codes for real life. You can access the entire learnings of someone else's career in a few hours. It tracks, doesn't it? Yeah. I mean, I dedicate my life to this. So, of course I'm going to agree with that.

センラ#11

どうやってほぼ殺した?

EN

Absolutely. I mean, you know, you're supposed to agree with me, but like I I I really think we need to shout this more from the rooftops, right? Like it's you know, like the one weird trick seems to be just like read books, right? Like it's um and and it kind of doesn't matter. Just make a habit of reading books and like ideally change genre every three books or so at least for one book. And then that'll that'll all like give you a range that you you can draw on for basically everything you'll ever do. So, like look, I I I I read lots of books, lots of them, you know, just like you know, especially uh when I went from programmer to uh business um uh like realizing I have to just learn business really quick. Um I um I got really dismayed with the quality of the business books pretty quickly because frankly, I think the business books are largely written by uh by the people who have time. We're not the people who actually built the companies frankly. Um so, um so you read between the lines as well. Depends on like if if a person who started a company or a person writing a book is a sales person, every problem can be solved with sales. If a person is a marketer, clearly every problem can be solved with marketer. And I mean, at least that I can take away to as a trap to not fall into, right? So, I was determined to not um be the engineering type founder who was going to see everything as an engineering problem. Uh because that would be called blindness and like I would that's what capped my capabilities. So, um I really tried everything and learning like the you know, just how to, you know, build the team in such a way that I delegate everything and I have my uh um different business lines and you know, arrange things. This is sort of after the IPO when I realized I have to be a very serious uh public company CEO. And so, um it almost killed the company, honestly. How did it almost kill the company? It was actually COVID that saved it. At this point, like I I had the inclinations that something was really really going poorly. Um Um it was a time we didn't have a lot of competition. So, which is also um really really hard for businesses. It's not a good thing at all because um again, you you don't get you don't have good rivalry and you can't you can't sort of like even if something seems really good, you don't know because there's no one else to keep you honest about it. You have the distinction between a competitor and a rival. And you think rival competition is one thing. Rivalry is really good. I mean, it's the same, but it depends it's a mindset change. It's like I I think if you um again, if you compete with uh another company, like there's a lot of um we need also a version of what they have. Uh copying like you you do the Xerox uh strategy very quickly. Companies tend to get obsessed. Like there's companies which have very very like the most active channel in this Slack is where is the competitive analysis channel. Um where people just bring everything everyone else is doing. And I think that um while it that has some merit, um I think the problem is um it makes companies very reactionary, right? Like um I you know, like in in in in the arts, part of any everyone's art studies is um or at least fine arts, you you copy the great pieces. Like you you make uh copies of great works. Your next painting is not at the quality of a Van Gogh you just copied, right? Like so, um mimicry is actually not an excellent way of getting to excellence. Um and companies end up falling very much into this. Whereas if you treat someone like other companies in your space as rivals, much easier to have a positive sum outcome there because rivalries inspire you to be best. Like Agassi could not have been Agassi without Sampras being there, right? Like and he very very clearly states this in his book. The Sampras that existed during the Agassi era that Agassi like understood wasn't a real person. Then you read Sampras's biography, he just like tennis. Yeah. And Agassi hated it. Agassi hated it. And so, um the rivalry he created for himself created him in a in a very real way. In The Last Dance, which I loved, um like Michael Jordan, like he admits that he might made up this light at at some point. Which to me is like one of the most profound moments.

ルトケ#12

何かが本当にうまくいっていない感触があった。競争も少なかった——それは良いことではない。ライバルシップがなく、正直にしてくれる相手がいない。競争とライバルは違う。競争は「相手にあるものの版が要る」とコピー(ゼロックス戦略)に落ちやすい。Slackでいちばん活発なチャンネルが競合分析、という会社もある。価値はあるが、会社を反応的にする。美術では名作を模写するが、次の絵がゴッホの質にはならない。模倣は卓越への優れた道ではない。他社をライバルとして扱うと、正の和になりやすい。ライバルは最良であれと刺激する。アガシはサンプラスなしではアガシになれなかった。『The Last Dance』のマイケル・ジョーダンも、自分で作った「火」を認めている。

EN

Sometimes I play The Last Dance in the background while at work. It's my favorite documentary. My second favorite one is The Defiant Ones. It's about the partnership between Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine. A multi-decade partnership. That's the description. That's not what it's about. It's one of the best documentaries about entrepreneurship.

センラ#13

『The Last Dance』は仕事中のBGMにすることがある。2番目に好きなドキュメンタリーは『The Defiant Ones』——ドクター・ドレーとジミー・アイオヴィーンの数十年のパートナーシップ。ヒップホップ史は起業そのものだ。ジミー・アイオヴィーンにも先日録った。彼らが誰より先に音楽ビジネスを理解していた、と言っていた。

EN

Interesting. Hip-hop history is incredibly entrepreneurial. It's It's It's so We just recorded with Jimmy Iovine, who's the star of the documentary, 2 days ago or whatever this was. I don't even know what day it is. And that's exactly what he said. He was like, "They understood the business of music before anybody else." That makes perfect sense and totally tracks. You can see it from the outside. It's um Um we actually we see it from inside. Like it was the first category of music that was like killed it on Shopify. It's like there's like so like opportunities converted into products. Like like that. And it's it's like they made different. It was really really cool. Like this is beautiful thing about Shopify is the front row seat to um just seeing how high agency that the different industries are and how you know quick they absorb new ideas. And it's just like it's anyway, it's like a different topic, but like almost like a in video game like a god level view of entrepreneurship because you How many How many entrepreneurs on the Shopify platform?

ルトケ#14

Shopifyの内側からも見える。音楽カテゴリで最初にShopifyを殺した(成功した)のはヒップホップだ。機会をプロダクトに変えるのが違う。Shopifyの美しいところは、産業ごとのエージェンシーの高さ、新アイデアの吸収速度の最前列に座れることだ。起業家の神視点に近い。

EN

It's like millions, right? Like it's

センラ#15

プラットフォーム上の起業家は何人?

EN

And you're drawing like insights for your own work from the entrepreneurs on your platform. One of them we'll talk a lot about today was like the importance of differentiation. Mhm. But I want to come back to that. I want to go back to like So, you were thinking, "Okay, right after the IPO, I'm going to approach everything This is like an engineering problem."

ルトケ#16

何百万人規模だ。

EN

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Okay. legal background, right? Like this sort of what everyone emulates for whatever reason. And and it just worked really poorly for me from a product perspective. A company did fine, right? All the way through. COVID happened, well, and I'm like Okay. So, my What my company needs here from me is like five different things. One of One of them is All plans are invalidated fundamentally. Like everyone who has a plan, just please throw it out. Um We need to go and like go for everything we're doing and rewrite it because again, everything is based on a uh very long tree. Like you start with axioms and then you make a a huge amount of decisions on top and then you get to a conclusion and that's means this is how you spend your day-to-day building this thing because of these things. If any variable along this way is invalidated, what you should be doing is rewrite the entire thing on top, right? Like you should always prune back the decision tree all the way there and go forward. People not being able to go out of their houses is one of those things. Like I don't think we all knew that was a core assumption we had that people could just freely move around in the world, but we got told that that we can't do this anymore and it ended up being quite long and during COVID, at least in California and Canada and some places. So, we need to rewrite everything and that was kind of clear to me and sort of what I, you know, that's how you structure a computer program, frankly. I went through the entire road map and what I figured out is first of all, that was really really hard to get and people are fighting even like they're very much resisting talking about everything that's going on. And I found out why because like there's just a lot of boondoggles going on. There's just like random projects by random people that I would never found out about. I would have like And then it's like

センラ#17

その洞察を自分の仕事に引き込んでいる。今日よく話すのは差別化の重要性だ。話を戻す。IPO直後、すべてをエンジニアリング問題として扱おうとしていた?

EN

Why did you not know that was going on in your own company though? Because the company was like I'd say like 4,000 people. You know, it's sort of cause I distributed we started in Ottawa, Canada. We We had like Toronto office and Montreal office and so on. And so it just turned out that like, you know, in Toronto office, there was a fairly big project to build the features to add to Shopify so you could use it for running a supermarket because, you know, just they decided that supermarket industry is very large and we should go and capture 1% of all of it like the in the Dilbert comics, right? And so

ルトケ#18

いや。皆がマネする「本格CEO」っぽい法務・経営の型を演じていた。プロダクト視点ではひどく合わなかった。会社の数字は通っていた。COVIDが来て、「会社が僕に求めることは5つある」と気づいた。その一つは——計画は全部無効。公理から巨大な決定の木が伸びて日常のビルドが決まる。途中の変数が一つでも無効なら、決定の木をそこまで剪定して書き直すべきだ。人が家から自由に出られない、はコア仮定だった。ロードマップ全体を見に行ったら、まず全部を集めるのが難しく、人々は話したがらなかった。理由は——ブンドグル(無駄なプロジェクト)が大量にあった。ランダムな人がランダムなプロジェクトをやっていた。

EN

[laughter]

センラ#19

自分の会社で何が起きているか知らなかったのはなぜ?

EN

you know, and and frankly, it like I'm I'm not saying those were wrong decisions. The The sort of really surprising thing about building a business or just in decision making in general is that um making the right decision is actually child's play usually. Like you can make wrong calls but which end up because the world changes and up being wrong call later and so on. That's a different thing. Um Um But like most of the time if you like the bad options are in front of you, just prune them so they're away. They just don't make sense. They're too expensive or just like off mission or whatever. You The problem is and I think school, unfortunately, accidentally drills this into people is that there's one right answer is sort of what people think. And once they find a right answer that could plausibly accomplish the goals that they set out, they go with it. But that's like Well, there's probably hundreds of great answers and one of them is like far less work, far more especially in an engineering project, like the best solutions are always modular and components. You build one thing and it will work with everything else you did. Um Lots of bad software that people use is are things there which are just like hairballs inside. They're like none of the pieces fit together and a huge amount of code has to be written to extend the new thing, make it usable from everything else. And like I'm not going to bore you with those kind of details, but um if you look at the project brief, the team killed it. Probably everyone made their bonus. They delivered the thing. It just it's like an island upon itself now that and and and and after it's delivered, it nothing else in the product works. So, you were looking at things as like cos playing a like a CEO or business person as opposed to an engineer.

ルトケ#20

約4000人規模で、オタワ、トロント、モントリオールなどに分散していた。トロントではスーパーマーケット向け機能をShopifyに足す大きなプロジェクトが走っていた——業界が大きいから1%取ろう、というディルバート的な話。悪い決定とは限らない。意思決定の驚くところは、正しい決定はたいていは簡単で、悪い選択肢は剪定すればいい。問題は、学校が偶然にも「正しい答えは一つ」を刷り込むことだ。目標を達成できそうな正しい答えを一つ見つけると、そこに行く。でも優れた答えは何百もあり、その一つははるかに手間が少なく、エンジニアリングならモジュール的で、他と組み合わさる。チームはプロジェクトを完璧に届け、ボーナスも取ったが、島になって、他のプロダクトとつながらない。

EN

trust fully. I was like saying, "Okay, cool. You're being passionate and you seem to know what you're doing. I trust you to do the right thing." And um Um then I hear, you know, obviously we're going to keep talking. You give me updates on things. People learn pretty quickly what are the projects that I'm interested in. Talk me about those and nothing else. People learned how to direct uh my attention um to the things that they wanted to have my attention. So, how did you fix that? The moment I went through absolutely every project I did myself, took like many like 16 nowadays, uh canceled probably 60% of the projects and in the course of a year, I turned over every one of my executives. Like this is basically the consequence of this because I just realized that the in in many cases the core skill was um Well, I mean I I don't want to be unfair, but like it's just that um trust was broken in many cases and in a real crisis like COVID Again, COVID was hard hard hard hard hard. Um hardest time of my life um for sure. And

センラ#21

つまりCEO/ビジネスパーソンをコスプレしていて、エンジニアとして見ていなかった。

EN

[snorts]

ルトケ#22

完全に信頼していた。「情熱があるしわかっているように見える、正しいことをしてくれる」と。アップデートはもらうが、人はすぐ僕が興味あるプロジェクトだけ話して、注意を誘導することを学ぶ。

EN

um in a crisis if everyone is a one before, some people go to zero in a crisis. Some people go to a hundred. And um I found it's almost unpredictable. Um In fact, if I would have been betting before COVID about who was going to be um contributing the most, I would have been wrong if I had to guess entirely. Why do you think that is? I've been thinking about this for a long time and I I still haven't haven't gotten a good answer. I don't think they would have known. This is very interesting thing. I think a real crisis tests you in a way that nothing else does. And nothing prepares you right for it. I think at the end of the day, the thing that I have found is people who can adapt the fastest actually quite self-identify. Now I would be able to predict it. Very simple. Have you started a company before? So, Shopify is by by a founder, by founders, for founders, causing more founders, right? Like it's a celebration of entrepreneurship is glorious and people who reach for their heroes and doing modern day heroic heroics, go on a hero's journey with lots of naysayers, overcome incredible odds and lots and lots and lots and lots of headwinds. That conviction runs really deep. Sometimes we buy companies, of course. Um Um many of the people we we purchased um are still in at Shopify. People like people don't like stay for very long time because I think it's such a place uh founders and for high agency people. So, I always had a Slack channel with all founders of our companies that we purchased. Um we always I did a founder offsite with them once a year. They're just like cuz I find their advice just to be so good. They all have been responsible for people's livelihoods and that changes you. So, I went to the founders channel and said, "Guys, I need help, right? Like this is this place is This It's crazy here."

センラ#23

どう直した?

EN

Had you already started turning over your executives?

ルトケ#24

すべてのプロジェクトを自分で洗い、今なら16時間単位だが、おそらく60%をキャンセルし、1年で役員をほぼ入れ替えた。危機の中で信頼が壊れていた。COVIDは人生でいちばんきつい時期だった。危機前に全員が「1」でも、危機で0になる人と100になる人がいる。予測はほぼ不可能で、COVID前に賭けていたら全部外れていただろう。

EN

Yeah, once I realized that I was like And and it wasn't like one moment. It was just like How did you know that instinct to go to the founders channel and ask for help? I think that in a moment of like, "Where the … do I go? Who do I have most in common with and who can I Who can actually relate to the types of problems here?" Because again, my relationship to Shopify is different, right? Like I started it, right? Like it's like it's just like it's different from everyone else, but the second best thing is talk to people who have had this type of relationship with the thing they created. You know, I asked a lot of the founders to become my executives. In some cases, I took people from individual contributors in in an engineering team and put them in charge of a very large thing. You know what? It all Every one of us six worked. And it was like really remarkable because it really fed into an intuition I had anyway and what I found is uh during COVID is the founders of a company were actually not doing well because they were like similarly managed. They were like irrigants. What does that mean? They don't settle. They They They talk about absolutes. They If something is … they say so. It doesn't matter if everyone has agreed that to move on or something. It just it [snorts] knots on them in a way that's deeper than this other thing. And it's exactly what you have inside of you. Exactly. And so I I I I feel like this is it's a very special thing, and it's um companies reject it. Companies cocoon them. Sometimes they find such about they give outskirt like the skunk work team is like just like it's daycare for for people who otherwise tell you that your stuff your … doesn't smell, right? And … does smell. So, once I'm like no, you you don't get to put them in like found the daycare. You I'm going to put them right right in front of you like back on top of you. So, um

センラ#25

なぜそうなる?

EN

[laughter]

ルトケ#26

長く考えてもまだいい答えがない。本人も知らなかったと思う。本物の危機は他の何とも違うテストで、準備もできない。今なら予測できる。シンプルだ——以前に会社を始めたことがあるか。Shopifyは創業者によって、創業者のために、より多くの創業者を生む。買収した創業者の多くは今も残る。買収先創業者全員のSlackチャンネルを持ち、年1回オフサイトをやっていた。彼らの助言はすごくいい。人の生計に責任を持った経験は人を変える。そのチャンネルに「助けてくれ、ここは狂っている」と書いた。

EN

and so um you know the difference that made to this business is in nuts. And so, this is what I'm saying COVID saved Shopify because I I needed to take a move that was like very much. Okay, I built this company. I got to this point. It's important. It's actually maybe even more important during COVID than before because it was kind of like for millions of small businesses their livelihood for this time and the only way to make livelihood. Um and I'm super proud of what we did because I think the businesses that started in Shopify came early prob like actually grew and did better

センラ#27

その時点で役員の入れ替えは始まっていた?

EN

Someone grew faster than you. You said somebody beat you guys to a billion dollars a year.

ルトケ#28

気づいたらそうしていた。一瞬ではなかった。

EN

Yes. That's just the craziest thing. We're the best businesses ever graced their customers like that started on the platform for It's It's the greatest I love this thing. And so, I I mean again like they're fantastic. They're heroes. They're glorious. They're wonderfully discon- My founder made my customers have the same irritation with my software. And like they tell me it's like it's perfect, right? It's exactly what I want. And so, this was one of those moments saying, you know, what Toby like like maybe you didn't build Shopify completely by accident and your intuition might have been actually helpful and cos playing someone else probably not what you need to do. So, At that point you were running Shopify for how long? Uh no, it's yeah, about

センラ#29

創業者チャンネルに助けを求める本能はどこから?

EN

So, that you were 15 years in 15 years in This is very common biographies. I think it would surprise people like oh, why did it take so long to figure it out? It's like no, it takes a long time to actually build the skills and then the important thing about intuition has to be refined. Yeah. So, it's like maybe in 2005 you shouldn't have been trusting your intuition. Trust your gut is sometimes good advice, but it really depends on your gut. So, it's like no one no one is born with intuition for building businesses because first of all, building businesses is a completely every decade is different. Like some problems are persistent. Um Uh like I loved I listened to I think the episode you did on Larry Ellison. You were describing his frustration with problems in his sales team, which literally I had to. Like it's like, you know what? I I didn't actually live have to live that horror. I could have actually like there you know, I would have read the right Did you read software any of the biographies? Then it's like the the incentive problems are all commercial teams. It's like But that's the that's amazing part. I'm glad you just you picked it up because he's like, I'm … embarrassed. He's like I'm 40 something years old. I've been running this company forever and I didn't understand that incentives with my sales team mattered and they almost destroyed his company. He almost went out of business. I use your listen to podcast when I'm sitting in my racing simulator to practice for next race and like I got to that point and I had to like okay, I have to stop and just listen to this because I'm I'm I'm just feeling so much empathy for Larry Ellison of all people. How funny is that? So, [laughter] anyway Who's that empathetic person before you move on cuz I love where you're going. I can't help myself cuz you know this. It's like when I hear you saying like I'm getting really executives. I'm going to build an executive team of founders. That's not a new idea. Rockefeller was doing that 150 years ago. It's interesting how Uh the building blocks that largely Rockefeller invented. I mean, we call these things trusts because it was you know, like that that was a term. Um um they first used there. Toby's relentless dedication to improving his company reminds me of my friend Karim who's the co-founder and CTO of Ramp. Karim is one of the greatest technical minds working in finance. I spend a lot of time talking to Karim and every single conversation centers around his obsession with crafting a high-quality product and using the latest technology to constantly create better experiences for his customers. Like Toby, Karim believes that nothing is ever good enough and it can always be improved. Karim is running one of the most talented technical teams in finance and they use rapid, relentless iteration to make their product better every day. So far this year, Ramp has shipped over 300 new features. Ramp is completely committed to using AI to make a better experience for their customers and to automate as much of your business's finances as possible. In fact, Karim just wrote this, "AI is all I think about these days. It is our duty to be first movers and push limits so we can make the greatest possible product experience for our customers." That sounds a lot like the approach Toby uses. Both Karim and Toby never rest on their laurels and use rapid iteration to invent new products for their customers. Many of the fastest growing and most innovative companies in the world are running their business on Ramp, including Shopify. Make sure you go to ramp.com to learn how they can help your business save time and money. Let AI chase your receipts and close your books so you can use your time and energy building great things for your customers because at the end of the day, that is what this is all about, building a product or service that makes someone else's life better. That is what I'm trying to do. That is what Toby has dedicated his life to doing and that is what Ramp has done, too. Get started today by going to ramp.com. So, now you have the executives. You're going through the most difficult point in your life.

ルトケ#30

「どこへ行けばいいか。いちばん共通点があるのは誰か。この種の問題に共感できるのは誰か」。Shopifyとの関係は始めた自分だけが違う。次に近いのは、自分が作ったものと同じ関係を持った人たちだ。多くの創業者に役員になってもらった。エンジニアチームの個人貢献者を大きな責任に据えた例もある。僕らがやった6人全員がうまくいった。COVID中、会社の創業者たちはうまくいっていなかった——管理され、刺激物(イリタント)扱いだった。

EN

Yeah. And you realize, "Oh, I'm cos playing. I'm going to go lean into my intuition."

センラ#31

イリタントとは?

EN

Yeah. This is another thing why I think that decision you made six, seven years ago, however long it was, is why so many founders like study you, respect you, take pieces of like your philosophy as well cuz you're like, "God damn it, I'm just going to do this the way I want to do it."

ルトケ#32

妥協しない。絶対について話す。クソならクソと言う。みんなが先に進もうと合意していても、奥で引っかかっている。君の中にもあるものだ。会社はそれを拒絶し、繭で包み、スカンクワークス——「お前のクソは臭くない」と言い続ける人の託児所——に追いやる。クソは臭う。だから託児所はやめて、正面に、上に戻す。その差は計り知れない。だからCOVIDがShopifyを救った、と言う。数百万の中小にとって、その時期の生計の手段だった。Shopify上で始めて伸びた事業を誇りに思う。

EN

I was like, "Okay, I need to try something I think you have to do things differently axiomatically. Like if obviously axiomatically if you do the same thing, you get the same results. Differentiation requires new ideas. Um you are um instead of figuring out like spending the next 10 years of my life figuring out how well I can cos play someone else, what would a company look like if it just like taps entirely into my intuitions like in in my biases. I'm I'm doing literally the opposite now I'm as I did before because this didn't work so maybe the opposite works and worst case I triangulate the midpoint between those things. So, enabled by the very clear, fast, and obvious success of asking from founders channel to step up and run company with me. My real set of intuitions here again, intuition is your entire life's story rolled out for you to make a snap decision in a moment. What does my intuition say about what a company actually should look like? Like let's let's forget about the path dependence. Let's go full tabular rasa and go up up from axioms. And I started with really really really uh nothing. Like I started for like a project on GitHub literally. So, engineering tools my intuitions again. What is the first principle of of a company? Like what is like what are the inputs? How what are our decisions? Like put in conflict files what titles exist. What levels exist? How you know, I asked for all of the sales like compensation data, all the market data and put them into the repository. Turned them into machine readable files because they came got them as PDFs and so on and so on. So, I build a thing that then created like at the end had all the information to create a model of a company. Like literally this is Python code which takes the configuration files that we agreed on, things like how many people should report to a manager. All these bits and then computes them, uses something called a solver like a set solver specifically, and then with all these constraints, all these inputs, what should Shopify look like? What departments exist? What level exists? How many people are there in in which group and everything? And of course the first version very utterly incorrect and then I realized Are you doing this alone? I started it and then I got like two, three other people in it to help me. This This is and really really got into it. And so, this is this is called Shopify OS. It's Shopify operating system. It is really not being part of Shopify now. What it did is uh It It It became irrefutable that we didn't know all the principles. We had like something that was 8,000 people in in a company and there was 5 and 1/2 thousand different titles in a company. And it's like So, and some of them are just senior and senior staff, but in some groups senior staff was lower than director and some above. And it's just like it just when I tried to make something software addressable and tried to reproduce it, it showed every crazy unviable choice in the company very very easily. So, there's a system in engineering, not actually a well-understood part of it, but I think it should call desired state systems. And what desired state systems are is um It's It's It's a It's a thing where you say, "Okay, here's what should be." You hold that up to what is like you click on a website on a link and your react library behind it, what it does is it says, "Okay, I compute what it should be. I see what it is and now I figure out what is the minimum amount of steps I take to get this to that." And that's what you see on your web browser. I need a desired state system for this company. So, we have this model we created. And then we hold it up to the company and the job of HR is to be this record filer. Like how do you take the minimum steps to get from here to there? Um or change what we have in this system to approximate what we actually want. So, this is very technical. Here's the effect of it. Think about how much politics this removes. When my head of sales comes to me and says, "Hey, I need 50 new sales people." I can put this now into the system and says, "Well, that means um you have to either make these changes or you're going to lose some of your engineers or like because the system based on our agreements recomputes everything. Um so, I have um we can always look at the counterfactual. And then it's not like yes, boss agreed by playing golf to hire 50 more sales people and now someone has to carve like you have to pop on the find a pound of flesh somewhere in the engineering team and suddenly you don't actually work on innovation anymore because you never actually made the decision to not hire engineers because your budget doesn't allow anymore because but you did make the decision to hire um sales people and maybe this is the right decision. But now we can actually look at the consequences of every one of those things. So, that was hugely successful because it just created um such a legibility for for us and such a simplicity. It also just told us that so much was undecided. Like for instance, we took the concept of in in engineering this was already around. Individual contributors is a really really excellent career track, right? Like you can make as much money in good companies as an individual contributor as you can as a as a as a as a as a as a as a VP or manager or like the best paid people in many companies are now individual contributors at this point uh and uh in history um especially in machine learning. Like at least in the at the machine learning labs like OpenAI. But no other discipline really had that. You had to become a manager to to uh progress in your career. And so, I think one of the consequences for us was that um when I really really looked at it like, "Hey, I need more great engineers." The best place to recruit them from was my own management team. And like that seems silly and especially because we we are they actually great managers? They're really well respected because they're good engineers, so maybe but like don't they want to code? Like it's like and you know, so we created like this sort of mastery system we call it where you every job has uh this ability to stay um you can get these basically level upgrades frequently and at any set of responsibilities you can if you're insanely good at it, you can make lots of money and like that just seems like of course you designed like this. Why would you not?

センラ#33

誰かが君たちより早く年間10億ドルに達した、とも。

EN

Wait, so they can stay individual contributors?

ルトケ#34

そう。プラットフォーム上で始まった最高の事業だ。彼らが僕のソフトに同じ「刺激」を返してくれる——完璧だ。その瞬間、「Shopifyを偶然だけで作ったわけじゃない。直感は役立っていた。他人のコスプレは要らない」となった。

EN

take an example in engineering. If you're in like if you're 100 times better than the other people in in in this discipline usually, um you can make more money than a uh than than a vice president. Um now, that depends on the value you can bring, but it is possible. And just like like I kind of hated the way we did like compensation in the in the industry, right? Like again, these are these are boring topics and you need

センラ#35

その時点でShopify何年目?

EN

No, it's not they're not boring to to me and to the people listening. Wait, why do you hate the way that they were doing compensation in the industry? What I love about entrepreneurship is is is the level of responsibility personal responsibility people take.

ルトケ#36

約15年。

EN

I said as much earlier when we talked about the founders who have been responsible for people's livelihoods. It changes you, it does, right? Like so, like I I don't work myself well in an environment where sort of like everything is prediscribed. I I don't like joining other people's games. I and so on. All these kind of things are my biases and again, we're implementing my biases here. So, in COVID like this is 2022, I think or 21. Suddenly Shopify went down 80% of stock value. Right? Like that that's a like again, I didn't think that was a problem because like I think the stock market is basically like a betting market. It's sort of a betting market on the future value. Right? Like it's like it's not like you guys when when you guys are wrong, then you just better betting. Like in fact, so I work on the real market value of a company which you guys are betting on, but I don't know. So, like there's [snorts] such a discrepancy from the way I see people talk about stock price and uh and and how I or have ever or inside of companies this is perceived.

センラ#37

伝記でもよくある。なぜこんなにかかったのか、と驚く人がいるが、スキルを積み、直感を洗練するのに時間がかかる。2005年の直感を信じるべきではなかったかもしれない。「直感を信じろ」は、その直感次第だ。

EN

But what was going on in your head when it dropped by 80% though? Well, I'm like, well, but my head I'm relieved because I'm like, you know, I I mean I where where the stock was.

ルトケ#38

その通り。ビジネス直感を持って生まれた人はいない。十年ごとに違う。ラリー・エリソンのエピソードで、営業チームのインセンティブ問題への苛立ちを聞いて、共感しすぎてシミュレータを止めてしまった。彼は40代で長年会社を回していても、営業インセンティブが会社を壊しかけた、と恥ずかしがっていた。

EN

Yeah, yeah, of course because What do you mean of course? That's I don't know. It's like I I I I was like I was not about to like raise money. I did I had enough money in the bank. I'm you know, German, so like I don't take that like much. And so means like so Were the internal metrics strong? They did You thought they didn't deserve You didn't deserve

センラ#39

話を進める前に。創業者だけの役員チームは150年前のロックフェラーもやっていた。ビルディングブロックは彼らが発明した部分が大きい。

---

EN

economics are amazing. However, like um at the I I don't I don't want to say this right but I honestly don't remember the exact numbers. Like at the high point of our stock price, I think we were trading at beyond 50x of revenue and stuff like this. I'm like, yeah, that's not exactly value investing here, right? Like guys [laughter] and so I get it like so But you weren't worried about the fundamentals of the business.

センラ#40

さて、役員がいる。人生でいちばんきつい時期を通って、「コスプレしていた。直感に寄せる」と気づいた。

EN

Okay. Right? Like it's my like my job. My my job is to build the best company I can. Um [snorts] the betting market says that I can deliver that kind of thing. I'm like, yeah, maybe but you got to give me a moment here. Like like I I need a moment here for for doing this, right? Like so I [snorts] I the reason I bring this up is cuz again, everything I talked another entrepreneur and I just run it through this whatever the hell's in my head from all these books. And when I hear you talk about that, I think of that the time when Amazon stock he took Bezos stock like this in the short term or something like that from like something like you know, 180 down to six or 120 down to six. And he's like, "Yeah, but they were they were focused on something else. I saw the actual fundamentals of the business and I was like this thing's going to work." And so eventually, I think Buffett always repeats that thing where like in the short term, the stock market's a voting machine and in the long term it's a weighing machine. You just want to build a heavy ass company. And he's like and and Jeff's like, "I'm building a very heavy company. Amazon will be a heavy company, so I'm not worried about this like short term drop by 80 or 90%." That really tracks. And so, but like one of the effects was um and this is right. Like well, people got stock options at Yeah.

ルトケ#41

公理的に違うことをしなければ結果は同じだ。差別化には新しいアイデアが要る。次の10年を他人のコスプレに使うより、直感とバイアスに完全に寄せた会社はどんな形か。前と正反対をやる。最悪でも中点を三角測量できる。

EN

the level up there. And they rightfully say, "Well, how about it?" Right? Like it's like um um even if you say like, "Okay, well, I'm super game here to get us back there." Like this is going to be it's going to take some doing. I realized the psychological problem with everyone being so under water and having, you know, to spend years getting to basically the zero point where their stock options are worth like even a penny again. And um of course they were like, "Well, but that's um the company like the company gave me both things at the time. It's like I received them. I was I was I was passive in this interaction. Therefore, the company has some kind of responsibility to kind of make me whole here." And I think that's actually, you know, I I mean I not necessarily see it this way because like like the risk was there and like these kind of things and like again, it's like other people voting that's causing this price. I didn't set it. However, I I do see the point. Like they they had no agency in the process. So, we rebuilt our compensation system to completely the opposite of what everyone else does. We we give people here's your annual salary. Here's an internal system you go in, you look at it. This is the number. Now you get sliders. You can uh say how much do you want in stock? How many do you want in RSUs? How much of this do you want in shop cash actually? Um and how much do you want in cash? And you can change it every quarter. It's like you decide like like how much money you want. Um and um you can even use a couple like a tool that's there to lock in the value of the stock you receive for 3 years. Like it's it's like again, sometimes orthodoxy can come back on the table if you get there from good principles. Like you can actually join Shopify and get exactly the same stock option deal that companies get at other places um by using the tool we give you, but you have full agency and you make this choice. The consequence of this compensation system is kind of beautiful because what happens is first of all, it's super predictable. Second, you know, if you go stock and the stock appreciates and you you hold them, you make more money. If uh like the stock goes down, you know that's more stock options than um in your next quarter. So, it like it's it's rebalanced against the actual value every every quarter. So, it works really really well. It's very popular. It's was kind of hard to do because doing this worldwide for people in many different countries was like kind of a legal nightmare because like that's like all sorts of rules around how to change around changing your salary. We figured it all out. So, we have a blueprint of how people want to do it. It works really well for us. But we're kind of proud of it because it like it's it's it's just like again, it's a point of differentiation and we believe it works much better and again, I want people at the company to also feel like this is a company that is like never sleepwalks into anything. Right? We we we kind of we are deliberate about things.

センラ#42

創業者チャンネルから人を引き上げた明確で速い成功が、それを可能にした。

EN

When you started this, I'm going to do it my way. I'm working with the founder executive team. You were in the process of that and the stocks dropping.

ルトケ#43

直感とは、人生の物語全部を一瞬の決断に巻き戻したものだ。経路依存を忘れてタブラ・ラサで公理から。最初はほぼ無——GitHub上のプロジェクトから始めた。エンジニアリング道具としての直感。会社の第一原理は何か。コンフリクトファイルにタイトル、レベル、何があるかを入れる。セールスの報酬データ、市場データを全部リポジトリに入れ、PDFを機械可読にした。設定ファイル——マネージャ一人に何人まで、など——からソルバーで会社のモデルを計算するPython。Shopifyがどう見えるべきか。最初の版はまったく間違っていたが、本気でハマった。2〜3人を入れた。

EN

No, it was already like that. That that went So, that was a 2020 20 early 21 project, I think. And then I think I think the stock market when when did that change? Like 21 late some these years are totally running together for me because it just was I mean there was no weekends. There was no I I can't tell I can't remember who said this. I was talking to a much I talked to a lot of older founders. I'm obsessed with like People think I'm obsessed with old people. It's not that. It's like this guy's got 50 years as a as an entrepreneur experience as an entrepreneur. Turns out they know some … They seen some … Surprise.

センラ#44

一人でやっていた?

EN

[laughter]

ルトケ#45

始めてから助けを入れた。Shopify OS——Shopifyオペレーティングシステム。今のShopifyそのものではないが、原理を全部知らないことが反証不能になった。約8000人の会社に約5500の異なるタイトル。グループによってシニア・スタッフとディレクターの上下が逆。ソフトで再現しようとすると、実行不能な選択が全部見える。エンジニアリングにdesired state system(望ましい状態のシステム)がある。ウェブのReactが「あるべきDOM」と「今のDOM」の最小差分を取るのと同じで、会社のモデルを現状に当て、HRの仕事は最小ステップでそこへ行くこと、またはモデル側を現実に近づけることだ。

効果は政治が消えることだ。セールスヘッドが「50人増やしたい」と言ったらシステムに入れる。合意に基づき全部が再計算され、エンジニアを削るか他の変更が要るかが見える。ゴルフでボスが承諾して採用し、エンジニアの予算が知らないうちに削られイノベーションが止まる、という決定を、実際の帰結として見えるようにする。可読性と単純さが生まれ、未決定が山ほどあることもわかった。エンジニアリングではすでに個人貢献者(IC)トラックが優秀で、良い会社ではVP並みに稼げる。MLラボでは特に。他の職能はほぼ管理職にならないと進まなかった。だからマスタリー・システムを作った。どの仕事でも、恐ろしく上手ければ責任のセットのままレベルアップしてたくさん稼げる。

EN

Yeah, and he's just like, "Man, you're going to remember the beginning of your company. You're going to remember the end and like so much in the middle is going to He said exactly what you said. It just like blurs together.

センラ#46

ICのままでいられる?

EN

Yeah. So, he's saying you should document it more.

ルトケ#47

エンジニアリングで、その分野の通常の人より100倍良いなら、バイスプレジデントより稼げることもあり得る。価値次第だが可能だ。業界の報酬のやり方が嫌いだった。

EN

I totally agree. Um uh lots of the years are totally running together. I I I have reasonable record keeping on this, so I I I and um especially with all these AI led agentics like reprocessing of nodes process and so on, you can actually reconstruct these histories and timelines and I'm fascinated with this right now, but um So, my understanding though, like you thought you're now looking at running a company as like an engineering project.

センラ#48

なぜ嫌い? 僕や聞き手には退屈じゃない。

EN

So, I'm like, let's engineer company. Be a company engineer. That's what I tell my team. That applies for every single department in like do you engineer marketing? Do you engineer everything? I require my um uh executives to uh um I mean, at least tell me, but actually do it. Go to a podcast, some international conference and and and and and talk about how Shopify does the thing the conference is about differently and why that's better every year. If they don't have a good answer for how they were doing this right now or how they would That's That's what I'm working on with them to uh crystallize that message. And um um there's a couple of reasons why I do it this particular way um that we can get into um they're partly psychological, but like it's also just like

ルトケ#49

起業の美しさは個人責任のレベルだ。人の生計に責任を持った創業者について前に言った通り、それは人を変える。すべてが事前に規定された環境ではうまく働けない。他人のゲームに入りたくない。それがバイアスで、実装しているのもバイアスだ。2021〜22年頃、Shopifyの株価は約80%下落した。問題だとは思わなかった。株式市場は将来価値の賭け市場だ。彼らは間違えばただの賭けが悪い。僕は彼らが賭けている実体の価値を作る。社内の株価の語られ方と、僕の見方はずれる。

EN

get into it now. What's the psychological It's I study the brain a lot quite a bit and you know, main conclusion you get to um about the brain is really about the brain is a um uh retrospective narrative alignment mechanism. Not uh It's It's actually terrible at record keeping, but it mostly attempts to uh take the most salient uh version of our self identity and reconcile the history with it. And um it sort of rewards you for actions that are directly uh uh um congruent with with this identity and it uh dissuades you um from dissonance with your own identity. But, you can actually like change your identity quite a bit and that actually makes this whole process work for you um significantly. What do you mean by change your identity? Like the way you view yourself?

センラ#50

80%落ちたとき頭の中では?

EN

Literally affirmations work, right? Like affirmations work, which is the dumbest trick that that that works. I'm so glad you're saying this cuz people from the outside like this guy's like very logical engineering and but you're all about intuition and now you're talking about affirmations. You're speaking to the choir, just so you know.

ルトケ#51

むしろほっとした。資金調達の直前でもなく、現金もあった。ドイツ人なのでそういうのを甘く見ない。内部のエコノミクスは素晴らしかった。ピークでは売上の50倍超で取引されていたと思う。「価値投資じゃないよね」と。

EN

I'm a tool maker. Like I always project very idealistic, but I'm actually not that idealistic. I'm super um I'm I'm I'm I'm like a craft person tool maker person. I I I my entire life was making tools. I literally my my pro I Shopify is a tool. Um I make tools very often for tool makers, right? My my my hobbies is making tools for engineers who people who make tools, right? So, like it's it's a frac like my my my life is a fractal of tool making. It's all about tool making um uh aesthetics. It's all about the craft behind it, but also um also not because of craft for its own sake of I appreciate that, too, but even that's not for idealistic reasons because appreciating the craft behind the tool making happens to be pragmatically an excellent way to get really good at tool making. Like everything is about outcomes. What's the affirmation word though? The affirmation that like you are if if you tell yourself or or write down 100 times something about yourself, um that writes it into the neurofrontal cortex at such a deep level that your brain will start reconciling you to that, right? It just works. Um I I've used that very often to like I you know, like I I was terrified of public speaking until I just sat down for like a week and every day I spent like 10 minutes just writing that I like public speaking. I love public speaking. You You wrote that down?

センラ#52

事業のファンダメンタルズは心配していなかった。

EN

Like I I know. Yes. And now you you love it?

ルトケ#53

していない。でも50倍売上なら、それは届ける義務だと見る。仕事は最良の会社を作ることだ。賭け市場がその水準を言うなら「まあ、ちょっと時間をくれ」。アマゾンが短期で大きく落ちたときも、ベゾスはファンダを見ていた。バフェットの「短期は投票機、長期は体重計」——重い会社を作れ、だ。問題は、上の株価でオプションを貰った人が水没し、実質ゼロに戻るまで年単位、という心理だ。「当時会社が両方くれた。受動的だった。会社が穴埋めする責任がある」という感覚。完全には同意しない——リスクはそこにあったし、価格は他人の投票だ——でも、プロセスにエージェンシーがなかった、という点はわかる。だから報酬システムを業界の正反対に作り直した。年収の数字を内部システムで見せ、スライダーで株式・RSU・Shop Cash・現金の配分を自分で決め、四半期ごとに変えられる。3年ロックのツールもある。原則から辿れば正統に戻れる——他社と同じオプションの取り方もツールでできるが、選択のエージェンシーは全部本人。結果は予測可能で、株が上がれば多く、下がれば次の四半期で株側が増える再バランス。世界中の法的悪夢だったが設計図を作った。差別化の一点であり、この会社は何にも睡眠歩行しない、という感覚を全員に持ってほしい。

EN

Yeah, like a week later and I knew it's not This works when you know what you're doing, right? Like you don't even It's like it's not like a placebo. It's like it's actually like you just actively change your your frontal cortex in this moment. So, um I I I use this often. Um uh I I sort of write to myself message in a bottle and these kind of things. That's all of that different topic, but like it's So, the point is like I I tell

センラ#54

「自分のやり方でやる」と創業者役員チームの過程で株が落ちた?

EN

What's the topic there? Hold on. You write messages to yourself?

ルトケ#55

すでにその方向だった。2020〜21初頭のプロジェクトで、株の変化は21後半あたり——年が全部溶けている。週末がなかった。

EN

Yeah. Affirmations or just No, it's just like like generally when I feel like something is like, "Hey, there's something I figured out that I really like." I know I have to write a scheduled message to myself um to remember it because like I I need space to repetition on on on that idea. What's an example of that? I mean, for for instance, like you have a company um um keynote for like kind of thing, like a company get-together summit once a year in Toronto for a week. And so, um you usually I uh did a keynote there and like then I write a message in a bottle to myself of what was good about the process, what was better about the process, what to do next different differently and all of topics I left in cutting board, just so like to get a head start. So, like that's a random example of that. How did you learn this that you could change identity, that affirmations work, that writing these things to yourself?

センラ#56

年配の創業者が言っていた。会社の始めと終わりは覚えているが、真ん中はぼやける、と。

EN

I think trial and error, but like I think the hints are like everywhere, right? Like it's I mean, affirmations are one of those things that Like I mean, there's a reason why they like society co- creates rituals, right? Because rituals end up being largely affirmations uh on on repeat, right? So,

ルトケ#57

まったく同意。記録はそこそこ残しているし、AIでノートを再処理するとタイムラインを再構成できる。今そこにハマっている。会社をエンジニアリング・プロジェクトとして見ている、という理解で合ってる?

EN

What do you think of visualization? Like sort of manifestation these kind of things. I I uh um probably works, too. I You know what? The funny thing is I think everything works um if if you if you just do it. The question is what's effective and quick. It sounded to me before like I started doing all reading all these biographies. I was like, this is some woo-woo foo-foo nonsense. And then you see very smart, analytical, logical, many case inventors and engineers and it appears over and over again. People that know each other, they didn't they worked in different industries, different times, lived in different parts of the planet and they all talk about doing this. And it's parallel construction. They all come to the same conclusions in different words. And so, Yeah, I'm I'm I'm I personally I mean, in the in in this of department, I'm extremely uh um taken with the stoic philosophy. Control what's under what is under your control. Know what is um and then um do the best possible job. It's the job is the thing. Like like the the whole project in life is just try to become very very good at something uh and ideally cultivate some significant skill, create potentially service products and then share them with as many people, right? Like you do this um because that's what you're on planet Earth for, right? Like it's like do things that matter in the world that are under your control, but also sign yourself up for like it's okay to sign yourself up for most interesting in um places um um as long as you remember what your job is in within them. So, in this way like I I love the current times and I I love the technology industry. I have a role inside of it, which is like I'm taking care of my end of entrepreneurs, small businesses, but you know, I try to use the word of technology, use word of uh retail um through their own work then um self-actualize and that is a worthy goal and worthy job. And so, like you know, I I comes out and I'm like people are like, "Well, should I start an AI lab or whatever or should I like Don't you want to, you know, work at OpenAI?" And it's like, "I mean, everything would be interesting, but you know what? What's really cool pursuing the same problem in a changing landscape, right? Like now I get to reinvent everything I've already done. How How fun is that, right? Because I really care about these problems. Anyway, back to the uh affirmations and uh sort of self gymnastics. Um going to the my team and just saying, "Look, you know, just tell me what you will talk about on stage." is bad. It's like afterwards you need to internalize this as something that you have committed to me um as imagining I imagine that something they care about they care about um reconciling and so they have to do it, you know, because otherwise they uh you know, said something untrue to me, right? And like they don't see themselves as someone who is saying untrue things and therefore, you know, you can actually make the reconciliation work for for your own benefit in this in this kind of way. It also just means like it emphasizes like difference, right? Difference is so important. It's so like orthodoxy just really needs to be off the table uh from the beginning of a project or like from the beginning of decision making. Have you ever studied James Dyson? No. Okay. If I could only recommend one book ever, it's his first autobiography. But, one of He has a He has a crazy line about this. So, this is also very common with great entrepreneurs and you you hit on your other talks like, "Well, if you want to I'm trying to chase excellence, trying to build the best in the world or make the best tools possible." Like therefore, that demands difference. That that path, that mission I'm on the I can't do it if literally I can't be the best if it's the same. Yeah. Like just think about this. And so, like Edwin Land, who was Steve Jobs' hero and the founder of Polaroid, he he had a personal motto. He says, "My personal motto is uh very personal and it may not work for you." But, he said it is, "Don't do anything that somebody else can do." He just would not He I'm not making a me-too product. But, the reason I bring up Dyson cuz now he owns one of the most valuable privately held companies in the world, right? But, he's writing that book when the business was fine, but he had one product in like one or two markets. He was doing like 300 million a year revenue. Not a bad business, but a very small business compared to the size that it it compounded to over the next like four decades or three decades. And he says in that book even at that time, he's like uh differentiation and retention of total control. And he goes it he goes you make it different different even if it's worse. Yeah. That's one of the craziest sentences I've ever read.

センラ#58

会社エンジニアになれ、と。

EN

agree with that.

ルトケ#59

チームにそう言う。全部の部門で。役員には、年に一度、国際会議やポッドキャストで「Shopifyはここをどう違うやり方で、なぜそれが良いか」を語れ、と要求する。今その答えがなければ、一緒に結晶化する。

EN

to be different even if it's worse. I really agree. I see it all the time because again, it's gets back into the copying of the painting problem. Like you can make a seven out of 10 solution to everything, but copying the seven out of 10 that already out there in the market. But, if you make from tabula rasas um axioms your own version of it, you have mastery over even if it's a six out of 10. You can iterate on this. You can take this past the seven afterwards. Like so, very often especially in technology, the world belongs to the fast, the people who iterate, the people who would like adjust, the people who understand what's costly and what's unnecessary um and who will prune away the rest. And um I find actually the probably net I um for pixel the most inspiring picture that it that I think exists or where I've ever come across um is the SpaceX Raptor rocket evolution. Like, have you Do you know Yes, I know exactly. I use that as a as a image for the Dyson episode I made. That is perfect. Exactly, it's perfect, right? Like, you you like you look at this and say, "Yeah, that's um Yeah, like that that's that's today's Picasso, right? Like, it's just like this is this is it. Like, this is We're we're not in a point of time where the great works and the masterpieces are being done by one person, they're done by teams. They have few teams can move forward by subtraction. That is like does not exist in industry usually. Very very very rare. So, it's it's beautiful in that way. You have to do things different. You have to make them your own and you have to have mastery over over the first version if you want to take this file further. I mean, this is We talked to earlier about the podcast I do in inside of a company called Context. And it's about that. It's like, "What How did we make the decision?" It's like everything around the decision is more interesting than the decision. Is this podcast constantly updated? This is So, it's internal only for Spotify. God damn it, only for Shopify.

センラ#60

心理的な理由は?

EN

especially when we talk about podcasts, that makes sense. It's like Well, they have um It's funny, I looked at my end-of-year wrap on Spotify, and one of the podcasts I listened to the most, which was shocking to me, was they have the internal company history. It's called uh Spotify a product story. And it's because, you know, everybody else I think one of the reasons that uh we have a mutual friend, obviously, in Lulu, she's on your board, and the importance of telling your own story. Like, is it What I told We went to dinner the other night. I was like, "Lulu, what I love about you is like you're repackaging old ideas." Like, Napoleon told his own story, Julius Caesar told his own story. Like, they all these people did it. It's very valuable idea. And so, everybody was trying to tell the company history outside of the company. They're like, "No, you got all this other wrong. We're going to make it ourselves." And it's like a I think a 10-part uh podcast, but they they originally, I think they built it for themselves, and then they like published it.

ルトケ#61

脳は回顧的な物語整合メカニズムだ。記録は下手で、自己アイデンティティのいちばん顕著な版に歴史を合わせようとする。アイデンティティと整合する行動を報酬し、不協和を抑える。でもアイデンティティはかなり変えられ、そのプロセスを自分のために使える。

EN

know about this. I love this. You should You should listen to it because it's um narrated by Gustav, who was head of product, who's now co-CEO.

センラ#62

自分の見方を変える、という意味?

EN

Yeah. And they take it in chronological order. And so, like if like Sean Parker played a big role at the very beginning, right? He's obviously not there now, but he's on like episode one or two. And then they interview the people that made the decisions. And that's the whole point. Like, we were making Think about all the crazy … that you go from, you know, desktop to mobile, all the all the things they had to deal with. Well, just go listen to what the company did at the time. Executives and founders but not only what they did, why they did It's And the why is so much more interesting. Like, one of the Like, the term of Tobi said is real inside of Shopify, right? Like, it's like people just throw these things around. Like, "Well, Tobi said we're doing it this way." Right? Like, and I I I just like try to get people to like always ask when. When I said exactly. Do you change your mind all the time? Yeah, yeah. And this is not even I learn about this because something is like really really odd and like really odd decisions. Like, there was easier ways available. Like, how did we get to there? And it's like, "Well, it's like everyone said that you wanted it this way." And it's like I'm like, "The Under which context, when did I say this? Like, clearly we've never talked about this." So, it's like it's very common thing. So,

ルトケ#63

アファメーションは効く。いちばんバカにされがちなのに効くトリックだ。

EN

What's a typical episode? Is it you explaining your thinking of what's going on currently in the company?

センラ#64

外側から見ると論理的エンジニアに見える人が直感とアファメーションを語る——大歓迎だ。

EN

Yeah, yeah. It's like taking people back to major decisions. Are these short episodes? No. Like, initially I went through phases where I was sort of for the first maybe 50 episodes, we said like we we had a we we have to mix it down to 23 minutes because we calculated that that was the average com- commute in Shopify. Like, so we we we checked where everyone lived compared to the offices. We ran the data, and it was 23 minutes. And so, we made it 23 minutes because that seemed like as good We We needed a reason. And you like designing with constraints. You talk about this a lot. Exactly. So, so, you know, just like I Well, I also just don't like picking 20 minutes because it sounds good. Like, I want like I need a better reason. So, I I I might say I want something to be like 20 minutes sounds right, but let's find an actual good reason why it's 20 minutes. And then we found 23-minute reason. So, sometimes you're allowed to like just parallel construct the thing you want to do anyway. Then at some point we abandoned it because just like you know, the nice thing with podcasts is like people can skip, move. It doesn't matter. Like, you can just keep going for hours and hours. And uh Do you have any ones that are like long? I think there's one which we had to cut over a couple of episodes that ran like I think if you ran it for like five hours. It's like What was that one about? That was like the philosophy of engineering um with a bunch of our uh our distinguished engineers. Like, like how how You know, like it's you would not believe how immature engineering is as a discipline. Um

ルトケ#65

道具作りだ。理想主義者に見られるが、実は超プラグマティックな職人・道具作りの人だ。Shopifyも道具。道具作り手のための道具を作る趣味もある。人生は道具作りのフラクタル。クラフトを愛するのは、それが道具作り上手になるプラグマティックな道だから。アウトカムがすべて。自分について100回書き続ければ前頭前野の深いところに入り、脳がそこに合わせ始める。人前で話すのが怖かったから、1週間毎日10分「人前で話すのが好きだ」と書いた。1週間後には好きになっていた。プラセボではなく、前頭前野を意識的に変える。

EN

[snorts]

センラ#66

自分へのメッセージも書く?

EN

It's just like um there's so many good ideas and so many bad ideas, and it's so hard for people to sort through them in in a way that's like way harder than any other industry cuz it has a weird property Like, software has a weird property. Um I mean, the best thing and why the business model of software is so insane is because of zero marginal copying of software is free, right? Like, I It's like you can you know, you build Shopify, first person signs up, you make money, second person signs up, uses exactly the same thing. And it's like um you know, the second instance of it is not it's the same piece of software. So, um hence the margins of software are incredible. The same thing causes a lot of problems for the creation of software because you just don't know how much dead weight is in the system. If you compare this with um electrical engineering, there's a very clear cost of manufacturing, right? Like, the the bill of materials is like the thing that dominates the success of a product because it dominates then the cost, which then dominates the product market fit. Um it also manufacturability is uh a huge component in electrical engineering. It's like Is the Is the board laid out in such a way that it's prone to defects? Did you choose all the right components? Are they like Is like one chip get really hot next to a soldering thing? But like, you know, I remember the original Xbox desoldered itself if you just played certain games too long. So, you know, but there's real constraints like this. So, excellence is obvious in a way. It It is like in the numbers and everything. Everyone's trained on costing waste into the system. Software engineering just is throws away so much of the capability of these incredibly powerful machines um partly because it just doesn't cost anything. However, at a certain scale, it starts costing, but at this point it's being fixed by operations teams getting more servers rather than engineering teams going back to fixing those things. So, the um consequences of uh bad decisions in software engineering are next to reality that doesn't accrue back to the engineers who caused it in almost all in instances. So, it's like a little bit like a factory's polluting the environment. It's just like it doesn't cost back to them. And so, anyway, so therefore, it's a very tricky um industry to move forward. It actually quite often moves backwards significantly. Computers got much faster, and we threw a huge amount of capabilities away um making like these very very heavy client-side JavaScript applications that took over everything. They were just got awfully slow and very error-prone and took forever to load, especially in e-commerce where people vis- visit sites rarely. Some of our customers went out of business because they got talked They got talked themselves into their own stack. They had a CTO who brought in their own team. They used a set of technologies that they wanted to use because they are currently the in thing that that has the most interesting conferences and the most interesting places. Then uh they deploy it, and uh you know, like it sort of works and it in the demos, but the problem is when you're going to that site the first time, you have to load it all, and you don't have an up-to-date MacBook, perfect hardware with much memory like everyone has who's working on engineering teams. Uh you might have an Android device, and you might be on a train right now. You're sitting there a minute and a half for this thing for this online store to load. Guess what the conversion rate of that online store is. Zero. Yeah. I'm quite annoyed by this, although we uh that was a real real real real problem in 2023, especially when like I think a bunch of frankly, us you know, older engineers had to like take the kids to to the side and just like have a good conversation. And that was the con- That was the context of the episode of Context. At least that's what led to this particular thing. I don't know if he actually succeeded there, but like I think we didn't need to because I think uh Like, I think the world just changed. Like, moment zero zero interest rate phenomena uh they're they're they're gone. People actually wrote better code out of sudden. Like, it's it's like amazing how much Like, how consequential Like, the zero interest rate uh um absence of zero um percent interest rates actually ended up being. You could feel it in the engineering team being less prone to accepting random waste into their stacks. It's unbelievable. Oh, that's interesting. I don't know if I've ever heard anybody else make that point. I I think this idea of hearing directly from the founder in a audio way is underutilized. I did this episode on the founder of Kinko's. He was dyslexic, okay? Yeah. So, So am I. Yeah, I heard. Which surprised me. Um so, he Actually, a lot of great founders are dyslexic.

ルトケ#67

いいことを掴んだと感じたら、スケジュールしたメッセージを自分に送る。反復のスペースが要る。例:年1のトロントの社内サミットのキーノート後、プロセスの良かった点・改善点・次回違うこと・まな板に残したトピックをボトルメールする。

EN

It's very common. Yeah, it's very common. So, it shouldn't surprise me. So, he's like, "I can't read your goddamn email. And I'm not I He was also um I think he said he had like ADHD, so he couldn't sit down at a desk. So, he his job was like what I like to do best. He's like, "I just go around." And all the Kinko's at the time were owned by individual people. Like, so it wasn't like one cohesive corporate structure. And so, therefore, there's a lot of experimentation going around. So, he would just travel the country, and then he'd spend all his days in the stores, and he'd be finding me cuz of all these two people doing different trial and error good ideas.

センラ#68

アファメーションが効くとどう学んだ?

EN

Yeah. And so, he what he would do, this is back in the day, he would call into a corporate voicemail. And so, he at the end of day, he'd give like a 3-minute update about all the good ideas that he saw.

ルトケ#69

試行錯誤。ヒントはどこにでもある。社会が儀式を共創するのも、繰り返すアファメーションだからだ。

EN

Mhm. And then you'd come in as a Kinko's employee the next morning, and you could play Paul's

センラ#70

可視化やマニフェステーションは?

EN

voicemail. I love it. And then he he this is an interesting thing that you might agree with though. They after doing this a while, he's like, "You're resurfacing all these great ideas, right? This guy in Memphis found the best way to do X. Yeah. Why don't you mandate that everybody in the company does X, this guy's way?" He goes, "Because if I do that, that's the best way it will ever be." Mhm. Which kind of relates to what you just said. He's like, "Listen, there's a [clears throat] probably a hundred different good ideas, or right ideas. And if I stop here and don't keep tinkering, going back to that word that you like, then that's the best it will ever be." If you need something and you tell people what to do, uh you might get it, or you will probably will get it. If you don't tell them what to do, you might get something you cannot possibly imagine if you have good people. And so, this is like actually a really really important thing. It's much more important to create an environment uh in which people can um be their most excellent self, uh it is to uh prescribe here's the precise um uh moves to do. So, how do you create an environment that people can be the best version of the excellent version of themselves? Or did you say is this related to your idea where you're like, you said something that made me chuckle. You're like, "I don't do corporate baby proofing." Yeah. [laughter] Yeah, exactly. Like I mean, exactly. I I absolutely, it's the same idea. Like the baby proofing thing is real. Like what's what is internal uh uh policies, right? Like processes. What are what are they? Um they are like, "Do this thing different from the way your intuition tells you to." Um Okay, why are you wanting people people to behave differently from their intuition? Like like let's let's look at our higher order bits there. It's like like what other op- opportunities do you have? Well, you could change environment such a way that doing the right thing is intuitive. All right, that's that's pretty good because now you don't have to post the policy. Um you could also um you know, hire the people who who whose intuition is uh better honed. They often policies and processes are um sort of downside protection. Um um you're trying to make hard to make um uh to to avoid the people who do things wrong to be of uh you know, causing so much damage. That's like like the you know, downside protection. But you're also really limiting what the best people can do, right? So, I think in creating something like an environment almost as a box for people. Like here's the space, and I want you to fall like inside of the space is um this problem I need you to solve. Right now, my world in Commerce world is attempting to figure out what generative commerce is, how it works, how the all the companies are working together, like how you have the research labs work with everyone else, how to expose product catalogs for my entrepreneurs, how to make sure that transactions can be uh met, what the um uh large language models need um in terms of information to, you know, do a fantastic job as a uh when when people ask them to be their personal shoppers. Um You know, that's a box. Like inside of this somewhere, somewhere in it, it's all dark, um is the most beautiful solution. Um What tools do we have to explore this box? It's like dark. Like I I don't know. I I can take a stab at it and paint a picture of what I think is good, but that's just like sending people into the room with a couple of tools. Afterwards, they need to make their own decisions, and I want want them to do this. Like I'm not there. I don't want to like control every decision. The company makes millions of decisions every day, right? Like in in a building like this, right? But what I can make a decision of like this like help them um really want to be on this journey. Help them fall in love with a problem and see the potential. And um I can make sure it's the right team, and everyone has the right skills. And I can make sure that um um that uh they know what they have decision power over, and like how to um at some point uh because, you know, people are only willing to take so much risk. Um how to transfer that risk to me, ideally. Uh or to a company, right? In in the form of our projects work in phases. A prototype phase is what I just described, um where you explore the problem. Uh then you think of I like when you've learned what you need to learn and think you have something that you can uh build, um you make a proposal, and you transition out of the prototyping phase. That's a meeting, right? Like that's a you know, that's what we call like it's it's a phase transition in our in our project system. Um there's software that manages all this kind of thing. Uh they can use my AI to preview what the what what the um uh transition will like be like because it's trained on all the other reviews I've ever done. Um so, they can sort of mock do it, um and figure out what they will probably say. Um that saves me a lot of time. And then we have actual um uh meeting. And

ルトケ#71

たぶん効く。面白いのは、やれば何でも効くこと。問題は効果と速さだ。伝記を読む前は「ふわふわのナンセンス」だと思っていた。賢い分析的な発明家・エンジニアが産業も時代も場所も違うのに同じ結論に至る——並行構築だ。自分はストア哲学に強く取られる。コントロールできることに集中し、最良の仕事をする。人生のプロジェクトは何かに非常に上手くなること、スキルを育て、サービスやプロダクトを作り、できるだけ多くの人と分かち合うこと。テクノロジー産業が好きで、その中での役割は起業家・中小の側を預かること。小売とテックを通じて自己実現させる。価値ある仕事だ。「AIラボを始めるべきか」「OpenAIで働くべきか」と聞かれても、全部面白いが、変わる風景の中で同じ問題を追い続けるのが本当にクールだ。すでにやったことを全部再発明できる。

話を戻す。チームに「壇上で何を話すか言え」と言うのは、コミットメントを内面化させるためだ。僕に言ったことと矛盾したくない自己像が、和解を仕事に使う。同時に違いを強調する。正教はプロジェクトの最初からテーブルから外す。

EN

[snorts]

センラ#72

ジェームズ・ダイソンを研究した?

EN

um you know, then they tell me what they're planning to do, what they've learned, that helps me a lot. And then I say, "Okay, uh okay to transition." Um yes. Some engineering leads, design leads give a okay one. I give okay two, um and then they are in a build phase, and then a new phase starts. That's a new box. They have they have uh agency to make decisions in there. At this point, I assume the risk. This is it's like a trade off um a accountability um for autonomy. And so, um that's how we found we can almost operationalize this this um system. Uh because what I'm finding is like um I mean, all the biographies you you you read, what you find is uh I'm sure is that the moment of insight, the often the product that made the that started all, or the artworks um that uh are defining the careers, um they were not really coming out of an office building environment, right? Where someone had OKRs, but of a precise metric to hit, and then like Da Vinci probably did not have um uh one Vitruvian Man as an OKR given to him, right? Like it's like you you kind of have to create an like a box for them sometimes, a physical space as well. Um like he he was in an attic, but just ended up being where he did most of his creative work at uh to I believe. And um so, you try to figure out what is this sort of environment in which uh where excellence um uh and creativity can come together. Um and then collapse it to saying, "Okay, now the company needs what it needs because we need to make resource allocation decisions. I mean, you bring more people onto a project at this point." There's a couple of sort of things that need to be decided, and then autonomy is regained um uh until the uh next phase is releasing, um at which point we do that review. And sometimes we say, "Okay, we we're not ready to transition because we need some things we need to do differently." Um but that's the way Shopify orchestrates now. These are all things that exist today based on the days during COVID where I reviewed every project in current. And like well, what should I be able to do if I would be like if I would be a competent CEO, what would I have put in place so I could do this thing I need to do here in the beginning of COVID very very quickly? Given that I wasn't, and now I aspire to be, what needs to be created? And so, like what I would answer to that is uh we worked hard on it. We I think we just discovered some extraordinarily powerful uh systems, mechanisms in in in this sort of journey. That was the prompt. Like what would a competent CEO do in this situation? I love to take the view that like I'm a um um corporate raider. And uh um Shopify went bankrupt, and I bought it on a fire sale, and I I'm like marching in on day one here, and previous management was crazy, and um we need to turn this place around, right? Like that's my favorite. Like this is my I I I love playing this game every uh like year. Um figure out what I would do differently, and then like it's like, "Let's go." I I I have my to do list. And um I ask a lot of teams to do this a lot. Like it's like when when we have systems that just don't work. Um One of the most powerful, you know, maybe before affirmations made for its parents things you can do, is just don't be prideful about the prior work too much. It's a lot You're allowed to have pride in it, but like you want to wake up better every day, right? You want tomorrow's version to be better than today. And for that, you have to kind of downgrade what's there. Like you can't like the sunk cost fallacy is so powerful. But how's that an affirmation? Like how does that represent Like how do you when you're actually talking to yourself, or you're writing this down, or this is your inner monologue?

ルトケ#73

していない。

EN

I literally write hit pieces on the past, right? It's just like A hit piece? Yeah. Like I just like all the things that are wrong with the thing I somehow am really proud of. You are so much like some of my favorite founders. Dyson's like this. Uh my friend Karim, who's one of my closest friends, he's the co-founder and CTO of Ramp. It's like nothing's ever good. The way I describe him is just like, "No resting on laurels, no sleeping on wins. Do something great, and then do it again." Steve Jobs said this. He's just like, "Well, what's the proper response when you make something wonderful?" He's like, "You do it again." Yeah, let's go. Um You know, a lot of these a lot of these great people, they don't really have rearview mirrors. Like they they'll obviously learn from what they did, but they're not like, "Wow, look at look at my trophy room." They don't think that way.

センラ#74

一冊だけ推すなら最初の自伝だ。卓越を追うなら違いは必須で、同じでは最良になれない。エドウィン・ランドのモットーは「他の誰かができることはするな」。ダイソンは本を書いた時点で年商3億ドル規模だったが、その後数十年で複利した。その本でさえ「差別化と完全なコントロールの保持。違え、たとえそれが悪くても」。

EN

Mhm. Look, nostalgia um was put on death certificates in the 1800s, right? Like it's like it's people died of nostalgia in their minds. I mean, they really died of something else, but like I've never heard that before.

ルトケ#75

同意する。模写の絵の問題に戻る。市場の7/10をコピーした7/10はできる。タブラ・ラサから公理で自分の版を作れば、たとえ6/10でもマスタリーがある。あとから7を超えられる。テクノロジーでは速く反復する人、コストと不要を理解して剪定する人の世界になる。いちばん刺激を受けた絵の一つがSpaceXのRaptorロケットの進化だ。

EN

It's like we we used to know that nostalgia is is is is is not a good thing. It's like it was it was one the bad uh um indulgences. Now it's fairly wise. So I think nostalgia needs a little bit more um scrutiny. Overcoming sunk cost fallacy is one of those things that like any path that you can take to get there is going to be enormously beneficial. Well, I think playing the game of corporate raiders is a great way to do

センラ#76

ダイソン回でもその画像を使った。完璧だ。

EN

[laughter]

ルトケ#77

今日のピカソだ。傑作は一人ではなくチームが作る。減算で前に進めるチームは産業ではほぼ存在しない。だから違うことをし、自分のものにし、最初の版にマスタリーを持たねば先に進めない。社内ポッドキャストContextもそれだ——決定そのものより、決定の周りのすべてが面白い。

EN

Exactly. So so when you you develop tools for

センラ#78

社内限定? Shopify専用?

EN

separate yourself cuz that was your decision. You might be like, "Oh, well, like I feel a little sensitive about that." It's like, "No, no, this that was somebody else's. This is a new company now." So one of the things that is unpopular that I when I do it inside of a company is like I really … talk the past. Especially if I did it. You know, like you know, there's still like systems that I built inside of the system. So I like I You … talk the past publicly?

ルトケ#79

そう。

EN

trash like like I make fun of all the ways in this hilariously wrong in in funny ways and I I I need to remind myself especially when I do this in an area I didn't work on. But like I I got to like I have to provide it or like I have I need these like corporate raider like I'm collecting these now.

センラ#80

Spotifyの年次ラップで、社内史ポッドキャストをよく聞いていた。ボードのルー(Lulu)とも話した——自分の物語を語ることの大切さ。ナポレオンもカエサルもやった。外が語るのを待たず、自分たちで作る。10パートくらいで、当初は社内向けだったのが公開された。グスタフ(当時プロダクト責任者、今は共同CEO)がナレーションし、時系列でショーン・パーカーなど初期の人も出る。何をしたかだけでなくなぜが面白い。

EN

It's almost like distancing yourself. I need to help people not think that what I'm doing is I'm passing judgment on their prior work because I'm not. We're all to like expect everyone

ルトケ#81

知らなかった。聞きたい。Shopify内では「Tobi said」が本物の用語だ。みんなが「トビーがこうやれと言った」と言う。だから「いつ?」と聞け、と何度も言う。

EN

you are passing judgment on the prior work and not just passing judgment on them as a person. This is what Rick Rubin talks about in his book all the time. But it's not this anymore once it's out there. Right? Like this is the thing. Say more about that.

センラ#82

いつも考えを変える?

EN

They need to disconnect from like the work is collected is the moment the pull request is accepted or okay to is accepted. You've converted like your craft into something the company is like is in the company's commons. It's a company is a collaborative project where everyone contributes and there's a process by which it's contributed at which point the company accepts it as being on quality and [snorts] says like this is now part of you know like my like the company's embodiment essentially. So the product you've contributed it. You can um you deserve the credit for this and and so on. But the company could have had someone improve it at any point of time. But it's not yours. It's like we don't allow people to use word ownership over parts of the code base or so. We only allow stewardship as a work like just as a as a proxy term because sometimes you need to be able to talk about it. In this way it the company thinks of it that more like an open source project. You're contributing into the commons. People talk about Wikipedia not about the particular editor of a Wikipedia page. You know what I'm saying? I have a selfish question before we move on. So you're looking at all past work. You have this guy named David Ogilvy who's one of the greatest advertising agency founders. He says that we have a divine discontent with our work. It's a perfect antidote to smugness. Right? Cuz he's like you don't want to rest on your laurels. I talked to James Dyson about this though because he has a very interesting organizing principle. So we're going to take this cup right here. This is a product. He goes, "This is organize this entire life." He's been an inventor and engineer for 55 years now. He's just like I see this product and I say ask myself, "How can this product be better?" Then I make it better. And then I put it down. And then I short time after I pick it back up. "How can this product be better?" I make it better. I put it back down. And he goes he just he goes, "I see the bad in everything but the interesting part is he's intellectually and emotionally mature enough." He goes, "You have to understand. It doesn't like I'm not a miserable person. I just look at it as like this is a problem. That problem is an opportunity and I want to work on that." What is your inner monologue when you're critiquing your past work? Are you harsh on yourself? Yeah, no no, I I get excited by by by finding problems. Like I I just like I love like I mean look at this point I'm such a long term veteran of of tech company building. I love figuring out what we're bad at stuff because like we have a pretty good thing going on. Like like all all intents and purposes this thing is working. Right? So and you know, when when when I figure out what like we're actually bad at something I'm like, "Holy … Like I'm an obvious blueprint for now how to become a better company now which is like actually my job my craft. Right? Like this is all opportunities. Things go into commons. They are being hopefully judged by everyone. I get grumpy when things that are shitty are not identified as such and improved and then I make people go do it and sometimes I do it by um uh trying to create um energy by just like roasting the thing's current state of what it's like I want I want people to feel no deference to it. I don't want people to respect the piece of code that exists and that or system that I want them to improve. Um and I want people to um um you know, just find their sort of energy source because I what I'm asking them is like go into the particular box that contains this problem and do the best possible better than anything I could possibly ask you right now for solving it because I expect people to um be highly agentic and you know, fall in love with problems and just like find better solutions than what you know, industry usually produces and so on. Right? That's my entire point. It's unpopular when people aren't in the right head space for it and it's incredibly effective if they are. So um the difference very often is just a couple of words. Um and a bit of framing and uh I just find that's like that's one of the most powerful sort of tools you pick up I think along um uh you know, along the the journey. It's like the five words to say at the beginning of sentence will change everything. Um And my co-founder actually gave me one of those very early which was like probably why I turned into this kind of thinking and this collecting these kind of things because

ルトケ#83

そう。奇妙な決定——もっと楽な道があったはず——に出会うと、「みんなが君がそうしたかったと言った」と出る。「どの文脈で、いつ言った? この話はしたことがない」となる。よくある。

EN

Wait, what what did you mean by the five words you say at the beginning of a sentence? I used to go again engineer. That's always like an interesting experience with four of the engineers working for me and um like I I I stay pretty current. Um with engineering I still do not a ton of production production engineering but like I do um I I sometimes start new projects with people like and then and the first 20 30 pull requests or commits in many repositories for things that we use come from me. So like I I I like doing this. It's it's part fun part I I sometimes need to tap into my craft. Um Anyway, um so that's a surprising thing for people. Of course. So my intuition was always like, "Okay, well, this is not the right architecture for this kind of thing." And I know this for a fact because I built this thing before. So let me go to a right um uh whiteboard and just like re-architect this. So like And so at some point and that like now you know, Daniel my co-founder like explained to me, "Well, look, you get people pretty defensive then because they just came to show you basically you know, what was objectively their best work because you presented it to you and that matters to them. So and then you just like doesn't matter if you go and make a much better system here at the drop of a hat. Um They are like um if I truly ever did this. Um They're going to be defensive and try to save face. So um just put for example in front of every sentence. And they're like, "What do you mean?" And now like I I tried this and it works perfectly. So instead of just telling them, "Hey, uh you know, instead of doing this like here's uh um uh architecture that that should use. Just say like I could think of doing this a couple other ways. Maybe it's something you want to consider. Here for example, what about this?" And then just do it. Now you're on the same side. You know, you're on a team. We're all working together on the same problem. I'm just I'm adding input. Now like everything is the same. It's five words or so in the beginning. I just find the magic of these five words is or not this specifically. It's like things like this. Like just frame things slightly different and life's easier. I read something Jeff Bezos said that changed my perspective on the importance of high quality sleep. He said that he makes sure he gets eight hours of sleep a night and as a result his mood, his energy, and his decision-making is improved. His point was that you get paid to make high quality decisions and you can't do that if you're sleeping terribly. And the product that has made the biggest impact on my quality sleep for years is Eight Sleep. I'm lucky enough to be friends with the founder of Eight Sleep, Matteo, and we live in the same city. A few months after I started using Eight Sleep, I randomly ran into Matteo at a restaurant and I was with some friends. So I go over and say hi. When I got back to my table, my friend asked me who was I talking to and I said, "That's Matteo, the founder of Eight Sleep." And my friend replied, "He looks like he gets good sleep." Matteo is living and breathing his product. I had never had the ability to change the temperature of my bed before I had an Eight Sleep. I had no idea how much that would improve the quality of my sleep. I keep my Eight Sleep ice cold. It's cold before I get into bed. So I fall asleep faster and wake up less during the night. That feature alone is worth 10 times the price. There are very few no-brainer investments in life and I believe Eight Sleep is one of them. That is why elite founders like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk have all said publicly that they use Eight Sleep. I would recommend getting the Pod 5 which is the newest generation of their signature product. It is a smart mattress cover that you place on top of your existing mattress and it is next level sleep tech. It automatically regulates your body temperature throughout the night independently for each side of the bed. The result is you get up to a full hour of additional quality sleep per night. Make the no-brainer investment in your sleep by going to eightsleep.com/ sandra and use the code sandra to get $350 off. You can try it for 30 days at home and return it if you don't like it but I'm confident you will love it. I will never let anyone take my Eight Sleep from me. Make sure you get yours at EightSleep.com {slash} Sandera. One of the things that Daniel from from Spotify, I almost said Shopify now for him. Daniel from Spotify told me to be fair. He's like, you should ask him like what were some of the advantages of starting with the Silicon Valley. I think that's just too much cross pollination. You you you kind of have to sync with companies towards like um entropy creates equilibria. And so you end up like if the companies just being very recognizably to each other and the activation energy for being very different is super high because that means people come with the wrong ideas into your company, behave incorrectly, and you have to like tell them to behave differently. Where um if you are outside of um a place where like Silicon Valley where people just move along between companies. I mean, first of all, especially early I I I traveled to Silicon Valley a few times a year, but I tried to just take it all in and learn as much as I could. But of course, what I got from everyone was not actually the answers to my questions about how to do things. I was getting uh the aspirations usually or the highlight reel. People wanted to seem smart, but like and or so so they give me the best version of what uh they think the answer should be or what the what the company ought to be doing. And so which is great because then I took that back home with me free flights in um and uh sort of took the the ideas that are relevant, um tried to to always put like a Shopify spin on it. Like I I I don't like taking ideas as you clearly can tell and never did. Um sort of like just like figure out how to localize them to our problems. And um um ideally try to do something better. And so only very many years later I did I realize I was like always for my career I was comparing my and our average to everyone else's aspirations and highlight reel. And just like that alone is a really really good thing. And if you then try to do better than that, um you know, sometimes like just ignorance is an incredible um uh way of actually just doing better. And uh so so that's that helps. Uh the process of having to translate a being able to translate things. Like we had no one like when Shopify IPO'd, um we had one um member of executive team who ever worked for a public company. That's it. Wow. We had no one who took a company public. We had no one who was an executive at a public company. We had one executive who worked at a public company once. And just like I think that's cool, right? Like it's like that's I think I I felt a real sense of accomplishment about that because like it meant we could we became our own thing. Our our entire motto becoming a public company was we are not going public. We are creating a public version of Shopify. And so that was like What's the difference between that between that those two substances?

センラ#84

典型的な回は?

EN

Again, becoming something else. It's like we don't want to uh like a lot of people avoid when they're a public company they're going to be different because like people sort of expect um public companies to be a certain way. At least the people who worked at Shopify did. I felt it was important to be different and do things differently. One thing we did, I think you will appreciate this, is um you know, we looked at the requirements. Um we talked about Formula One. Formula One's fun. It's Sorry, it was a little bit of a veer, but like Formula One I love because it's like there's a rule book. It's the opposite of every other rule book on planet Earth. People read it so that they can comply. The Formula One rule book is a rule book that is read so that you figure out how to beat it. It's it's like it There's no engineer in Formula One has anything to do with with a central casting engineer. Central casting engineers actually usually wants to get requirements and then comply to to them. They're like the people going to Formula One are the people who want to beat the system, right? Like this is um very important uh to them. So I I I I um uh count myself as [clears throat] uh of the archetype of the ladder. Like like the group of like I I would have liked being an engineer in Formula One. I I like beating the systems that that I'm uh that other people tell me to abide by. I heard a story one time that somebody had hacked your compensation system uh to get more money than, you know, essentially they just read the rule book, found this loophole, and you're like, good for that person. Like and then you'll fix the loophole or whatever the case is, but like that's exactly the kind of person I want working for me.

ルトケ#85

大きな決定の背景に人を連れていく。最初の約50本は23分に編集した——社内の平均通勤時間をデータで出したら23分だったから。制約で設計するのが好きだ。「20分がいい感じ」だけでは嫌で、本当の理由を探す。あとで捨てた。ポッドキャストは飛ばせる。数時間続けてもいい。哲学的エンジニアリングの回は、切ってつなげると約5時間分あった。

EN

Exactly. I mean, yeah, especially if it's I mean, there there's a way I mean, what happens next ends up mattering, right? So okay, this goes on. Like at some point this becomes well, you're just exploiting a weakness fully. I I mean, I don't want to give too many provisos, but generally like people who are like looking around to figure out like I I I never begrudge anyone being an intelligent actor in the local incentive system. That is just like everyone's allowed. That's pretty much my morality at this point. Like it's like um or or at least big part of it. You're allowed to do this. Um I own the incentive program or the system. It's not um you get too much out of the incentive system or it it if the incentive system tells you to behave in a way that is not congruent with the company uh the company's goals, that is my skills issue in designing the compensation, not not not not your job.

センラ#86

エンジニアリングが未熟だ、と。

EN

Not their fault for taking advantage of it, but really appreciate if you give me a heads up. Like so because we are still same team here. So like you know, may maybe you raise your hand at some point saying this is fine. Yeah, not like 10 years later after I, you know. So back to the IPO just like in the IPO we just looked for ways how to like within the very constrained rules by the SEC, where we do we have agency where we can do different things. We sort of honed in on the IPO roadshow video. Like It's like a horrible video player the IPO roadshow website is like an uh like and every other IPO we could find was just um you know, CEO standing in front of uh um a screen, camcorder, and uh just like going through the same slides. We're like, there's no rule for that. Let's do a … documentary here. Like let's like let's let's go through the history of why this company exists and why it's important. And he said like, what video can be put onto this space where no one expects it that will somehow hook people in to full screen the video within uh the first 20 seconds and actually watch the entire thing. And we we heard so much about this on the road. Like so many people were like, I always look forward to meeting you. What you guys did with this video was insane. I didn't even know you could do this. Every video every IPO after this was like always a little bit of like a nice little moment of put putting a bit of uh like agency into the process which was pretty uh I I heard this um this story one time. I think it was the like the founder of Sirius XM. I forgot who the person is, but they were like, well, how do you make annual reports? And there and there's like no rules around it. So you have to present certain information. So so they made a book. And like the book would be illustrated. And she's like, no one said we couldn't do it. It's like we're just going to do it our own way. Let me ask you a question though cuz um I I think I heard you say this as well. You you were getting what you felt was bad advice or incomplete advice or maybe advice not from first principles about like whether to go public or not. Or they say some people were saying stay private exactly. So yeah, yeah, I I get you. The advice was always like don't. Right? Like it's like um Who was telling you this? Other founders?

ルトケ#87

信じられないほど未熟だ。良いアイデアと悪いアイデアが山ほどあり、選別が他産業より難しい。ソフトの奇妙な性質——ゼロ限界コピー——がビジネスモデルを狂ったように良くする。同じソフトで二人目も同じ。だからマージンがすごい。でも創造側では、システムにどれだけ死に重さがあるかわからない。電気工学には部品表と製造コストがあり、無駄をコストに落とす訓練がある。ソフトは強力な機械の能力を大量に捨てる——コストがつかないから。規模でコストがついても、サーバ増設のオペが直し、原因のエンジニアに戻らない。工場の汚染に近い。だから前進が難しく、しばしば大きく後退する。コンピュータは速くなったのに、重いクライアントJSアプリで遅さ・エラー・初回ロード地獄を生んだ。eコマースでは稀にしか来ない客が、古いAndroidと電車の中で1分半ロードしてコンバージョン率ゼロ。2023年は実害があり、年配エンジニアが若い側とちゃんと話す必要があった——それがContextの文脈でもあった。

ゼロ金利時代が終わると、突然コードが良くなったように感じた。エンジニアリングがスタックへのランダムな無駄を受け入れにくくなった。金利の有無がどれだけ決定的だったか。

EN

Yeah. Uh founders. I think Silicon Valley orthodoxy definitely is uh to to avoid it. Um And um I don't know. I I I can tell you the story about my decision with like it's just like basically it's like I mean, I I I suppose I'm predisposed also when everyone agrees with something take the counterfactual just to hold it up to see if I potentially like it better. Super personality. Embedded personality. I just like find plan B usually is a better one. Um Everyone puts um plan B like a plan if if if I think for many many many people on planet Earth always doing their plan B would lead to a better experience. Right? It's it's like plan plan B gets the ambitious one the if this event happens in my life, … it, I'm just going to build a company. It's like such a common plan B. That might be what you actually want, but you're lying to yourself or you're scared or whatever. Yeah, and also again, you are a human being. Therefore, you have uh you come you firmware comes preloaded with a problem called the sunk cost fallacy. We just do. Right? It's like this you got to operate that out of yourself a little bit. You got to be able to like discount um what has happened more to make good choices because otherwise you just chase um bad with good money all the time or or chase bad plan with you're always in the day or whatever.

センラ#88

その指摘は他で聞いたことがない。創業者の声を直接オーディオで聞くのは過小利用だ。Kinko'sの創業者はディスレクシアで、ADHDもあり机に座れない。店舗を回って実験を集め、会社のボイスメールに毎日3分、良いアイデアを残した。翌日スタッフがポールの声を聞く。しばらくして「メンフィスのこのやり方を全社義務に」と言われ、「したらそれが最良のまま止まる」と断った。

EN

I think people are reflexively scared of change, too. They'd rather be in a bored boring or like even miserable environment than actually change cuz there's the fear of change is so great. So wait, so people are telling you So don't don't stay private longer. Like like you being private is better. Like friends of mine like at, you know, Stripe uh running this experiment like they managed to avoid what they put off in terms of figuring out how to stay private for such a long time is actually remarkable. I just think they spend a lot of time figuring out how to um stay private. And like I don't think that's the most valuable way to spend time. Right? Like it's like I think you So you went public 2015? Yeah. What were the arguments for staying private longer in 2013 2014 when you're having these discussions? We were tiny. We had um like 800 people. We're Canadian. So they're saying you couldn't I mean you. Yeah, like I I mean, when Shopify's first trades happened at I think a billion 1.5 billion dollar valuation. Right? Like so That's pretty wild that, you know, the public market almost got like venture could have got venture if you bought Shopify. Yeah, essentially had venture returns in the public market.

ルトケ#89

関連する。何をしろと指示すれば得られるかもしれない。指示しなければ、良い人がいれば想像もできないものが得られる。人に正確な手順を処方するより、いちばん優れた自分でいられる環境を作る方がずっと大事だ。

EN

Every once in a while someone puts together a list of best uh stock market returns over the last 10 years or like whatever. And like yeah, like I I owned that list. Right? Like just because I decided to take prop Shopify, like I did the old school thing. That was normal. That's what everyone did. That's what pe- people people went public fast. And And by the way, this is kind of important. Like you know, public market needs to have growth because where else is prosperity coming from for pe- for for people who don't have Like these obvious accredited investors um accredited investor uh laws and stuff like this. Um all they do is like make it so that like like when you're rich, you can invest in private company stock. Yeah. And when you're not, you can't. And well where are the returns? Like of course there's it's such a … conspiracy to keep everyone uh private because they're just like sequestering all the growth exposure to uh institutional and um investors and um people who are already uh accredited. And so I I I just I just really dislike that whole thing. I think like man, like again, it's it's a book building things and sharing what you figured out. And like people buying a ticket to ride um the Shopify because they like what they're building is like it please, like that's clearly what we want. So um so I I just think the institution of public companies is good. I mean but my beef is is with the whole notion of like uh influence over companies. Again, path dependence. As like one vote one's uh like a one one stock one vote is like yeah, but like no. Like every everyone studies con- like like decision making knows that you want to move towards uh like people who have most context should make a decision. That's like doesn't say that leadership of company. This is literally what what I'm talking about creating space for creativity because I want the decisions to be made um uh locally on the ground. So were the the arguments for staying private back then just mimetic? They were just They were just imitating what everybody else was saying and stuff? People aren't generally right. It just doesn't It It It washes out. Right? Like again, people have problems with the concept of like um very often a new idea is dismissed because someone can formulate an idea like a reason against it. And somehow that dismisses the entire thing. Right? Like you like we live fundamentally most of people spend their entire lives sadly um in a in a in a meritocracy. Right? Like where um you need um everyone to agree to do something, but you only one person to vote against it to not do something. And um uh again, good companies overcome this in in in important ways. And so similarly, um one good argument dismisses the entire idea um is a very common way to evaluate options. Um what people very very often don't do is reformulate all the arguments against the status quo. Right? Like the thing you're doing right now also is flawed. It's just do you really understand the upsides and downsides? The new thing might have way higher upsides. Or actually, maybe not. Maybe the upsides are obscure. But like um uh or hard to know for sure. But the downsides are clear and they can be formulated. Therefore the usual default position is not do it. So this is I think it's incredibly undisciplined because um you need to think in uh you know, propensities. You need to think in in chances. Like And sometimes you need to like really really load up um a decision for all the pros and cons that can be articulated and make it make it a little bit like in your mind like like look at where the scale comes out. For company that's trying to sell like the e-commerce platform for every everyone, especially for the many American companies, being a Canadian private company that's tiny and um is is it's not it's not ideal. So um you know, like it's it's people don't usually go public because of a marketing or like name recognition, but like You know, super valuable. Anyway Put it on the pro side. And then put everything else on the pro side, too. You might get better people working for us cuz some people really want liquid stock um to like and so you know, so on and so on and on. And in the end, it's like not even close. It's just you know, the downsides feel like a couple of annoying phone calls I have to do a couple quarters at least for the first 10 years, I suppose. Um and um the um I thought actually most of the process was actually quite valuable. Like like I learned a lot about my own business having to explain to others. Exactly. There's been a few previous guests on the show, Brad Jacobs, John Mackey, uh Daniel Ek, obviously running public companies. In Brad Jacobs and John Mackey's case, they both said like Ma- uh Jacobs makes that point. Well, one, he thinks it's like wonderful free marketing and advertising. Two, you have now have a cur- like you have a currency. Uh Mackey said the same thing. Like it benefited Whole Foods being public fast because then he used that currency to acquire a bunch of other other competitors and and accelerate his growth. So Brad Jacobs' point was just like he likes the pressure of that check-in where it's like this is what I'm trying to do with the company. This is what I'm saying to do with the company. And this is our results. Mhm. And I want somebody to say oh like there's a big disconnect here. And I want the pressure to like to actually um perform in like and have somebody these expectations um externally. We talked about the environment that you're building at Shopify. I want I'm curious about the how you think about the talent that's inside the environment.

センラ#90

どう作る? 「コーポレート・ベビープルーフィングはしない」とも言っていた。

EN

Yeah, of course. I mean ultimately, I really really believe in the sort of stoic maybe uh uh Adlerian uh idea of separation of tasks. Um what have I control over um and what I don't. I I always love uh um particular formulation about um uh thinking about how other people think about you. Like again, you need to make yourself a person worthy of being liked. If someone then dislikes you, that's up to them. It's not It's not your job to make people like you. It's your job to be likable. And if they make a category mistake, it's their own … problem. Right? So it's a really really freeing way to think about it. Talent. I um my job is to make a company worthy for the best and brightest work for. Like um this is the part everyone skips. Everyone's like oh we need to hire better better recruiting team. Well, maybe you need to also just like uh be worthy of the talent that you would like to have. Um so I mean this goes from like uh office space if if you have any to uh company uh like the amount of … people have to deal with to how much um uh you know, uh … politics can you subtract from the whole thing? Um and can you large company feel like a small company with lots of resources and lots of impact? Um you know, it's more fun to ship software to millions of people that you really respect than to uh um a few people who you then try to uh make a sale for at some point. Or like it's just like it's like you know, impact matters. In a way this like you got to be misquoted, but I think the talent eventually makes takes care of itself. There are not that many good companies to work for. There are not many companies that that many good companies that deserve um uh the attention of people who can be of by by by the most capable people um because they have a lot of options to start their own companies.

ルトケ#91

まさに同じだ。社内ポリシー・プロセスとは何か。「直感が言うのと違うことをしろ」だ。なぜ直感と違う振る舞いをさせたいのか。上位ビットを見ろ。環境を変えて、正しいことが直感的になるようにできる。ポリシーを貼らなくていい。直感がより研がれた人を雇える。ポリシーはしばしばダウンサイド保護——間違える人が被害を大きくしない——だが、最良の人ができることも制限する。環境は箱だ。箱の中に解いてほしい問題がある。今のコマースでは生成的コマースとは何か、研究ラボと他の連携、カタログの露出、取引の完了、LLMがパーソナルショッパーとして要る情報——暗い箱のどこかに最も美しい解がある。僕は絵を描いてツールを数本渡せるが、あとは彼らが決める。会社は毎日何百万の決定をする。できるのは、旅に本気で乗ってほしいこと、問題に恋して可能性を見ること、正しいチームとスキル、決定権限の境界、リスクを僕や会社に移す方法だ。プロトタイプ段階で探索し、学んだら提案し、フェーズ遷移の会議。ソフトウェアが管理し、過去の全レビューで訓練した僕のAIで遷移をモックできる。OK1(エンジニア/デザインリード)、OK2(僕)でビルド段階。アカウンタビリティと自律のトレード。洞察の瞬間や定義的作品は、OKRのオフィスから出てこない。ダ・ヴィンチにウィトルウィウス的人体のOKRはなかった。環境——物理空間も含め——を作り、資源配分が要るところで一旦まとめ、また自律を返す。これが今のShopifyのオーケストレーションだ。COVIDであらゆるプロジェクトを見直した日から生まれた。「有能なCEOなら何を置いていたか。今それを目指すなら何を作るか」。答えに向かって働き、強力な仕組みを発見したと思う。

好きなゲームはコーポレート・レイダーだ。Shopifyが破綻して安値で買い、初日に乗り込んで前経営は狂っていた、立て直す——毎年やる。やらないと決めたことをTODOにする。チームにもよくやらせる。システムが動かないとき、過去の仕事に誇りを持ちすぎないこと——誇りはいいが、明日の版を今日より良くするには、そこにあるものをダウングレードする。サンクコストは強すぎる。

EN

There's actually not that many great companies. It's your job to make one of your companies one of those companies that the best people in the world will want to What What do these people look like though? Because like The reason why I didn't move to Silicon Valley is because I knew how to create geographical consensus um in the Eastern Seaboard that Shopify is the best company to work for. Full stop. And I just knew I had the ability to do it because I knew how to build a company that I would want to work for. And I think given that I estimated I would need somewhere between a thousand people or something like this back in those days, I'm like I'm going to find another thousand people um that think like me about how good a company needs to be to to work for. And I can just launch all of them. So if I go to Silicon Valley, I can't pay what Google pays potentially or like someone else make makes up for their skills issue by just overcompensating. Um yeah, it's called compensation because you kind of have to compensate people for the … you have to you ask them to do. And um you know, like if if there's a lot of … you have to compensate people for, but you have enormous amount of resources you can make up for skills issues by money. Um and uh so uh in in East Coast which was much more hedge fundy uh and uh much more high finance and uh like for the kinds of hackers I wanted, I I I knew how to do this. Well, wait. I want to pause there. I love this idea where you're like I'm going to build a company that I would want to work for. Oh, yeah. That's on one end of the spectrum, which is great. You also had this like thought experiment uh that I heard you say before, which is like one of the worst things that could happen on the other end of the spectrum was you wake up 10 years from now and you built a company you don't want to work at. And you have this great line I want to pull. It's like that's dystopian. There's so many companies I wouldn't want to work for. Why did I use my life to build a company to build another one that I wouldn't want to work for? You just should build a company that's worth working for.

センラ#92

それはアファメーションとしてどう働く? 内的独白は?

EN

Yeah. It like again in in your you you should uh hit like take pride in your work um um uh like in in in the inputs and how you like did you accomplish the things you set out for in the aggregate? Right? Like um like be easy on the path, but like like the outcome does should matter to you. And like man, I just shake my head sometimes with like how people overcomplicate these things. It's just like it's kind of Man, people know what they're looking for. Right? Like and and some you know, I'm talking about very very very fortunate people here. Like people who have a lot of choices, who have like incredible competency and uh in in some of the rarest skills. And like a like combining this with enormous drive. Like it's like it's sort of you like there's like like a couple of attributes that all have to come together to um be one of those people who can command like a hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars of uh um compensation packages you can make in in in in in this industry but partly because you're worth it. Right? Like you're you're contributing more than that to a mission uh um like this and therefore you can command this kind of um uh compensation. And that's like the way it's all fits together. I think of everyone as an entrepreneur, really. Your capabilities, that you are an entrepreneur of your own work output. Your product is what you can do and what you can accomplish. Um your market is the companies that exist and um um you are selling a uh exclusive subscription um in a that's the institution of employment, right? It's a it's a two-sided um opt-in relationship. Whenever people come to me and saying, "Hey, how do I earn more money?" It's like, well, be too good to ignore when we increase compensation. You know, like it's like uh you know, like like be better. You you're making this amount. You would like to make this amount. In which way have you become um so good that you can add that amount of increase to, you know, just like the the the collaborative project we all working on. And so, I think that's just sort of clarified and simplifies things, right? So, um I I mean, all this said, I don't want to sound it like it make it sound like it's inevitable, but if you just do all the right things, you end up like you there's obviously information gap and reputation lag and um uh I'm I'm out there recruiting and telling people about the company um uh a lot. What helps me a lot is people are curious about the company and I've heard about the company and so on now. Like that's uh that is because of things that um uh were under my control. I tell people that it's an unshared attention company. Um there's no part-time jobs. You will have to put a lot into it. You're going to get even more out of it. You will even make great money, but we'll we'll we'll attempt to never be the highest uh compensation play um um bit. Um because we have found that the people who optimize for that above all else actually don't do well at the company um cuz Shopify is a mission-driven company.

ルトケ#93

過去に対するヒットピースを文字どおり書く。自分が誇りに思うものの、全部の悪い点。

EN

So, exactly. And um the thing I'll promise is like in terms of your own skill set partly by best demand partly by osmosis and partly by the strong culture that's surrounding you you will advance vastly faster at Shopify building capabilities, skills, and correct ways of thinking and mental models and these kind of things than uh I think at any other place. Therefore, the compound return to your career is going to be vastly higher here than anywhere else because you get to a potentially higher compensation level earlier in your career because you build it. The entrepreneurial story is is very fractal in Shopify. It's just like what is your product, what's the market, and does it fit? It's a it's just make is a clarifier that I think is worth talking about. I'm going to quote David Ogilvy again cuz I think it's interesting. He says like talent is most likely to be found amongst nonconformist, discenter dissenters, and rebels. So, when I ask the question about like, "Hey, we know the environment, we know the description of the environment, what are the people in the environment?" There is two ideas I got from two separate entrepreneurs. I've mentioned both of them already, but I I like cuz they use the same terminology when they're looking for talented people to hire in their company. Uh Daniel from Spotify and Karim from Ramp, and they both said the same thing to me. They hire for spikes.

センラ#94

ダイソンやRampのカリムと同じだ。何も十分じゃない。素晴らしいことをしたら、またやる。ジョブズも「素晴らしいものを作ったときの正しい反応は、また作ること」だ。後ろを見るミラーがない。

EN

Mhm. Spikiness. Spikiness. So, a lot of people a lot of big corporations, they want you like well-rounded. Like, no, no, this guy might be bipolar alcoholic or this guy might, you know, have some other might not shower. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

ルトケ#95

1800年代、死亡診断書にノスタルジアと書かれた時代がある。実際の死因は別でも、ノスタルジアは悪い耽溺と知られていた。今は称賛されがちだが、もっと精査が要る。サンクコストを超えるどんな道も巨大な利益だ。レイダーごっこは、自分の過去の決定から自分を切り離すのにいい。

EN

Like Steve Jobs, he was hired at Atari. And it was like, "Nolan, Nolan Bushnell, the founder of Atari, like you can't hire this guy. He stinks and he wants to sleep in the office." And Nolan's like, "Yeah, but he's really talented. So, he's going to sleep in the office and you just got to hold your nose when he's around." Do you do you agree with the idea?

センラ#96

社内で過去をクソ呼ばわりする? 公に?

EN

100% okay. It's like exactly it's it's like we never look at the credentials and stuff like this. I I again, I'm a high school dropout. It would be like rich if I would start making everyone want to have PhD. Um the path by which we do it is we we we go for a life story. We we ask you like, "Hey, give us your story." And this is a very important ingredient in our hiring process. And what we're really looking for is like high agency experience. We look at like something went wrong in your um in in in these story at some point. Well, now let's zoom in. How do you react? Give me minute by minute. This is what we learned now, right? Because a lot of us are entrepreneurs. Even everyone like I I talked about the founders of companies you purchased, but like most of the people just in general in Shopify are entrepreneurs. Many started Shopify stores, built a business, and then fell in love with the company and applied for a job and got a million. That's like so this is um there's a huge amount of building company building background. And we want to be surrounded by people we admire. That's I think the biggest product any company can deliver to their employees is so is that every day they're surrounded by people they deeply admire and can learn from. I think so. It's a very important part of this. So, lots [snorts] of entrepreneurship uh lots of entrepreneurial impulses um and then so we look for this uh high agency behavior um and um then um uh you know, obviously did you drive a particular craft uh that that that you you're applying for to to excellence? How do you think about this kind of thing? Can you just sort of talk about excellence or actually perform it? And then um you know, this is really what we fill our buildings with. And uh you know, just like again, create the space then and let them be creative in this stuff. This is how it always worked and it's it's it's worked really really well. We couldn't do anything other than this in the beginning, right? Like in the beginning, we had no money. Like not zero, like really zero. Um I didn't take a salary for like four years. Um I heard your father-in-law covered your payroll when you couldn't make it. That's right. Um so, yeah, we were living with uh my parents-in-law um Fiona, my wife's uh old childhood bedroom. Uh from which I also had I put put a IKEA desk and I built a lot of Shopify from there. Um and uh you know, like I mean, just kept costs low. That that was the main thing. Um make every dollar count is something that's I'm so glad. Like this is what I worry sometimes with all these really really big seed rounds. Like like money with mainly money to us is that uh gets you I mean, it it sometimes it reveals, but usually it just like makes you get a whole lot more of what you got before. Um and um people did raise early partly because they were not tight with money. When you get a whole lot more tight not tight with moneyness um at larger scale, it gets really really bad. You're making my heart sing because I feel like I'm like an on an island by myself about this cuz I've spent 10 years reading 410 of these biographies. All of them control their costs like crazy. They'll tell you over again constraints are your best friend. And then I talked to these young founders. I I I usually don't meet start founders cuz I'm an investor, but a good friend of mine is like, "Hey, meet this kid meet this young kid." Uh I met him and one of the things he was talking about was like, "Yeah, let me show you pictures of like this beautiful office we're moving into." And he was showing me everything. And I was like, "This is stupid. Like you haven't done anything. You don't deserve this." And I go, "Go look at like what where did like Apple start? Look at Microsoft. Microsoft started where? In a strip mall in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

ルトケ#97

茶化して、滑稽に間違っている点を全部からかう。自分が触っていない領域では特に、判断しているように見えないよう、レイダーの枠を提供する。

EN

Yeah, right. Like and you need a three a triplex in Soho? Like what are you talking about? And the question I what I pointed out was like, "Okay, how does this make your product better for your customers?" Right. And his answer was, "Well, I'll be able to recruit better talent because office is nicer." Then you don't have a mission. It can work, but like I feel like you're You built a $200 billion company in your wife's childhood bedroom. That's where you started.

センラ#98

でも過去の仕事には判断を下している。人としての評価ではない、とリック・ルービンも言う。出たあとはもう「それ」ではない。

EN

Yeah. Like maybe we should repeat that over and over again. Like just go look at where these companies were where You mentioned the Larry Ellison episode I did earlier. Like they were in a shitty office building.

ルトケ#99

プルリクやOKが通った瞬間、クラフトは会社のコモンズに変換される。協調プロジェクトへの貢献で、品質として受け入れられたら会社の身体の一部。クレジットは残るが所有ではない。コードベースの「所有」という言葉は許さず、スチュワードシップだけ。オープンソースやウィキペディアに近い——ページの特定の編集者ではなくWikipediaの話をする。

EN

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

センラ#100

オグルヴィは「仕事への神聖な不満は自己満足の解毒剤」と言った。ダイソンはカップを見て「どう良くできるか」を55年繰り返す。不幸ではない——問題は機会だ、と。過去を批判するときの内的独白は自分に厳しい?

EN

Like and like I think they had three uh like three separate rooms. Oracle. That's where Oracle started. I think um I mean, there's a well-documented uh effect of when companies build monuments to themselves, they usually decline right after, right? Like so, um but that's uh has a long running history in business history. Um I do think there's an like I I I do think that um companies underinvested into office space um for a very long time and it actually was a mistake. Uh I think I think space around us is actually extremely important, but it doesn't need to be expensive. Like like um uh that's probably an aside, but like

ルトケ#101

問題を見つけると興奮する。テック会社づくりのベテランとして、悪いところを見つけるのは「より良い会社になる設計図」だ——それが仕事でクラフトだ。コモンズに入り、皆に判断される。クソなものがクソと認識され改善されないと不機嫌になり、焙ってエネルギーを作り、現状への敬意を消す。問題の箱に入り、僕が今頼めないほどの解を出してほしい。エージェンシーが高く、問題に恋して、業界の通常より良い解を。頭の状態が合わないと不評で、合えば信じられないほど効く。差はしばしば文頭の数語とフレーミングだ。

EN

Oh, let's go down there. What does that mean? It's just like So, again, we didn't have a lot of money, but we wanted nice office spaces. Um there was uh this was the decades where there was a lot uh of open concept versus own room office spaces, right? Like was sort of a kind of fight. My co-founder is uh Daniel Weinand. He's he's a polymath. He learned programming when I asked him that I needed some help with programming and just like was good. Really it was annoying as hell. And um um before he was our designer and did like literally everything else, too. Now a DJ and before that he won poker tournaments. So, it's like it doesn't Like it it like he's going. It's like one of these It's actually really really helpful to have someone like Daniel as a childhood friend because it really really um misleads you about human capabilities. Like you could be This is just your buddy who does stuff like this. Um anyway, uh uh he uh at some point like he really really tapped into this no one can be more creative um than the space around them. And no one can care more than the person they work for, right? That's the way he like sort of created this um uh philosophy around this. Um I I told him, "Look, I here's here's max budget and we are getting like the office space that's like kind of cool and you need to figure out how to create play spaces that are like a 10 out of 10 on doing world-class work

センラ#102

文頭の五語とは?

EN

But inexpensively. But like you need to figure out how to make this cheap, right? Like so, um man, I mean, we built a bunch of offices in a row uh and they are obviously insanely good at this. I'm years in into Shopify. This is like 2000 I think 10 was the first one of the six six years in five years and four years after Shopify launched. We went out of like sort of above a coffee shop which was like really nothing to to our first office. So how do you do this? They like he said like first of all the economy is wrong. It's not between open office and like closed office spaces. There's like perfect midpoint. Because and and it has to come from your strategy of product. Shopify loves the five-person team. We increase to eight sometimes but we think the the best team size is one because like a single offer can do things that is impossible to do for teams and hit high notes that are unreachable. But I think play off has rather played the field of what can be done as solo projects actually changing again because of AI but like which is very exciting bit but like um most projects we're doing need to be done in teams. Then there's a magic number at five is sort of what the military ends up like figuring out to they they test these things and come to the same conclusions. You can sort of temporary go up but then at some point you have to split teams and parcel out the tasks. Each of these gradations is like a figure 10x loss of productivity. So Shopify is like of all like R&D team is in Toronto thousand people it's really lots and lots and lots of small teams. Um And this is also why we need this legibility coordination layer that I talked about earlier. Okay. So pods. Um They have figured out how to make pods that are like exactly they are private enough while being open enough and never make the office feel dead but they also draw you around. It's like what's a pod? What does that mean? It's just like a it's a room that just like sets up to like when you put the seventh person in you it's uncomfortable. Like it's like again, think about how much policy you don't have to post and if environment just makes you do the obvious thing. You can play that uncomfortable to too many people in this area. Like when you when you know what you're doing now you don't need to post a policy about how many people you want in a pod. And people self-organize into five people teams because that's the most comfortable thing to put in a pod. So um not meeting rooms and meeting rooms going to metal on unlimited floor space because you don't want people to spend all day in meetings and then get out of the dark rooms. We put like everyone sits around the windows in in pods and they are like structured in such a way that you know it all works. The coffee area is on the other side to create serendipity. We cut through every floor eventually to create stairs that move teams in such a way that certain teams that have to work together but work on infrastructure separated them out in floors so that they going to each other would run into other people who are using the infrastructure to you know and so on and so on and so on. So design being super conscientious about this is really important. Daniel did an amazing job. We we I think we open sourced the floor plans and I think lots of lots of modern like This is not interesting anymore when you look at what they look like because I think that work has gotten absorbed into the tech industry as a right midpoint. And but many people um cargo culted rather they just Xerox copied it essentially instead of understanding so they make pods too big or whatever. Look you know these kind of things. We caught them cargo culting a few times. You observe that behavior in other companies. I'm curious what internally you have caught your own company cargo culting. Oh we actually um we are in the Toronto office here. Um uh The Toronto office actually has a few floors that are clearly um mimicry of these ideas that they all figured out but are not they don't understand where where it is coming from. Like again pods too big is it is it's like more um the nice meeting room is right at the on the window has has lots of light. You know just like again maybe this is okay to have a view but like I went with the teams through it because we then changed some of the floor plans after we moved in and realized like holy … this is like oh Norman doors everywhere. … that's the craziest thing. I I fundamentally allergic to Norman doors. What's that? Doors but you push then And can't [clears throat] tell.

ルトケ#103

エンジニアの頃、部下に「このアーキテクチャは違う。ホワイトボードで組み直す」とやると防衛的になる——彼らが最良の仕事を見せに来た直後だから。共同創業者のダニエルが「文の前に for example を置け」と言った。「他のやり方も考えられる。例えばこうは?」とすると、同じ側・同じチームになる。五語で人生が楽になる。魔法は具体のフレーズではなく、わずかに枠を変えることだ。

---

EN

Yes. Yeah. This is the most like the most fundamental design error that you can possibly make is like create affordances on in a product that make people predictably do the wrong thing. Like this is such a like like literally everyone who was ever involved in the process of designing a Norman door should you know revoke their design license. Like I'm being facetious obviously that isn't a thing but like it's like it just like man it like skills issues as a door is like very common occurrence I think in places that are not conscientiously designed and like all of us do a certain place very fast. Like I mean the funny thing is you can usually turn a Norman door into a non-Norman door by cutting things away and like putting a push plate somewhere you know so that helps. So I I I make a big deal out of these kind of things. Like it's just like this needs to I cannot surround people with things that are underperforming the quality that we of of of engineering we want to do. And that's down to the detail of the doors in the office.

センラ#104

Spotifyのダニエルが、シリコンバレーで始めなかった利点を聞け、と言っていた。

EN

Yes. Wow. Yeah. Um Yeah of course. Um Yeah. I mean because product is not a thing. Product is an abstraction. Product is a name but like a handle that you put on some on some totality of a body of work. From the perspective of people creating product product doesn't exist. It's what other people call your work. A product is just details. It's minutes minutes and little details that are appreciated if they compose right and make a bloody mess if they don't right so from the inside perspective you have to sweat all the details. The way you do anything is how you do everything and that is absolutely down to the floor plans and you know the ambient noise levels and so on. Just like you go in a room that's like that like silent. It's like it's just like you you you notice when you're talking while going to a meeting room. Um at least on the floors we fixed based on previous specs. Um It's kind of uncomfortable talking hallway because so ugly and you walk in a meeting room and immediately like it's just a different noise level because it's just like diffuse we have an enormous amount of like in fact we actually worked with companies on Shopify to create their products of sound dampening that are now really really like supply all companies tech companies it's really fun. And so in fact like everything in our offices is from Shopify stores right because again like if if if anything we are doing is not mission aligned we just didn't align to the mission axiomatically so you know just you you can go pretty far in these kind of things. When you need something for office spaces and it's not on Shopify we usually put a call out for someone to start that thing so it's on Shopify and we help them get started and build the thing and then we can maintain our 100% Shopify record. That's also fun. That's incredible.

ルトケ#105

交差受粉しすぎるとエントロピーが均衡を作り、会社同士が似てくる。違うことの活性化エネルギーが高くなる——人は間違った前提で入り、振る舞いを直させねばならない。シリコンバレーでは会社間を移動する。僕は年に数回行って学び取ろうとしたが、答えではなくハイライトリールとaspirationが返ってきた。賢く見せたいから最良版をくれる。それを無料のフライトで持ち帰り、Shopify向けにローカライズし、できればより良くする。何年も経って気づいたのは、ずっと自分たちの平均を他人のaspirationとハイライトリールに比べていたことだ。それだけで良く、さらに超えようとすれば、無知は強力な武器になる。IPO時、役員で上場企業勤務経験があるのは一人だけ。上場させた人も、上場企業の役員経験者もいなかった。クールだと思った——自分たちのものになれた。モットーは「上場する」ではなく「Shopifyの公開版を作る」。

EN

We did at least one enterprise sale with a supplier because we really wanted their floorboards and for for something they were really like look great and were at the right price level and like yeah but we can't place the order unless you come to our platform. So it's so sometimes you have maybe cheated a bit.

センラ#106

その二つの違いは?

EN

good way to get a customer.

ルトケ#107

別のものになること。上場企業はこうあるべき、という期待に飲まれたくなかった。F1が好きなのは、ルールブックが他と逆だからだ。普通は遵守のために読む。F1は破る/攻略するために読む。キャスティングのエンジニアは要件を受けて従う。F1に行く人はシステムを打ち負かしたい。後者のアーキタイプだ。

EN

Yeah it's also a funny way of doing enterprise sales.

センラ#108

報酬システムをハックして多く取った人がいて、「いいじゃないか」と言った話を聞いた。

EN

[laughter]

ルトケ#109

その通り。次に何が起きるかは大事で、完全な搾取になれば別だ。でも局所的インセンティブシステムの中で知的に振る舞う人を恨まない。それが道徳の大きな部分だ。システムが会社の目標と不一致なら、設計した側のスキル問題だ。手を挙げて教えてくれたらなおいい。同じチームだから。

IPOではSECの制約の中でエージェンシーがある場所を探し、ロードショー動画に絞った。普通のIPOサイトの動画プレイヤーはひどく、他社はCEOがスライドを読むだけ。ルールはない。ドキュメンタリーを作ろう——なぜこの会社があるか、なぜ重要か。最初の20秒でフルスクリーンにして最後まで見る動画。ロードで「あんな動画ができると思わなかった」と何度も言われた。その後のIPOにも少しエージェンシーの余白が残った。

EN

Want this thing but you just need to migrate over to our platform first. All of the founders and extreme winners that I have studied have this one trait in common. They have excessively high energy levels. If you're going to be the best at what you do you need to maximize your energy and output and that's why I've partnered with Function. I signed up for Function long before they were a sponsor of this podcast and when you sign up they ask you what your health goals are and my response in all capital letters was maximum energy. Function provides access to comprehensive blood tests and other lab testing to help you improve your health so you can perform at your highest level. Function has made it easy for me to monitor and improve my internal health markers so that I feel at my absolute strongest. As a member of Function you get access to test over 100 plus biomarkers from hormones to toxins to markers for heart health inflammation and stress. Function gives you a straightforward analysis of all your results along with advice from expert doctors on how to improve things like your testosterone your stress hormones how to reduce toxins in your body and much more. The platform is absolutely beautiful and provides an easy to understand picture of your overall health. Once you try Function you will immediately understand why it's the fastest growing health platform in the country. You can now join Function for just $365 a year. That's a dollar a day. Learn more and join by visiting functionhealth.com/ sandra and use code sandra25 for a $25 credit towards your membership. That is functionhealth.com/ sandra. All right. I got to talk about we want to talk about video games. I want to talk about AI. I want to talk about being related. I mentioned my friend Kareem a few times. I went to his house last week and I was like dude I'm talking to Toby. He's also obsessed. He's has an engineering mindset like you. He's obsessed with playing video games. And you've mentioned a few times where like you know you thought you learned more about building a company from like Starcraft than almost than you know talking to much of or reading much of books. But then his whole thing was just like he's got to feel like it's even building with AI now is even more like a video game like

センラ#110

上場するな、という悪い/不完全な助言を受けていた?

EN

Starcraft.

ルトケ#111

助言はいつも「するな」だった。創業者たち、シリコンバレーの正統だ。みんなが合意していることの反事実を持つ性格でもある。プランBの方がしばしば良い。多くの人のプランB——「この出来事が起きたら会社を作る」——が本当にやりたいことで、嘘や恐怖で抑えている。人間のファームウェアにはサンクコストがプリロードされている。割り引けるようにしないと、悪い計画に良い金を追い続ける。

EN

Factorio? Yes. Okay. So, that's the example he gave me. I haven't played the game. Can you elaborate on that?

センラ#112

変化への反射的恐怖もある。悲惨でも変えない。

EN

I completely agree. So, like So, again, this is like man the world has such a weird way of like um somehow changing itself around me to make the stuff that I thought was uh uh irrelevant relevant so is late in life. It's like absolutely amazing. Um it's just like okay. So, so video games. Video games are best thought I mean this depends on very much on the video game. But in the aggregate they often say the good video games are simulations. They are a world upon itself and you are an an high agency actor and you modify things. You you you take you perform actions. Um you make decisions and then the game rearranges itself giving you a feedback loop of usually a very quick feedback loop because otherwise it's un fun. Um but it it you you learn about consequences of your actions. So, like um uh competitive multiplayer games are they obvious they are and and Starcraft and strategy games they they're not that popular as a category of games anymore. But like um you know, when I was going through my teens in the '90s like Starcraft was the biggest uh game. And um you know, I loved it because it was really really hard. It was like easy to learn how to master which is exactly I think the a hallmark of everything that's worth doing. Motorsports for for um kind of like for my for my hobbies tennis all all these things are like this. But like it specifically is like honest in a way that like there's like two people on a map mirrored. Everyone has the same potential every single game. Um and one person wins at the end. Right? Like it's it's like it is it's unconditionally it's a game of imperfect information. Um it's uh not like chess. You don't see the moves. Um you see only some information that like in fact you have to invest you have to use one of the things that could get you resources instead to go to the enemy base to figure out what he's building. And then you need to interpret this. So, all these kind of things is like what you're learning in this game is uh information is everything. Every like there's no right decision there's only context in which decisions could turn out to be correct. And um while resource management is extremely important um you have to understand that resource management is not just quantifiables. It's not just minerals and gas and gas that you have to manage which allows you to build units. It's also your attention. And frankly attacking other people's attention is much more profitable very often in in a game of Starcraft than it is um to actually attack the base because if you overtax their ability to pay attention to things they will make mistakes. How do you overtax their ability to pay attention to things? You can do an early attack. You can do any number of things. Especially if you play against the same person and then when you get up to a very high level you will play with the same people over and over again and they get a sense for how you play. So um at that moment like there's always been the people who are just like incredibly prepared. Right? Like they just like they they they perfected playing a single way which my play was always different. Chess Starcraft are the same. Like I I disrupt other person's play. Like I I do moves that aren't in books. Right? Which are they're not in books because they're not good. But other people can't deal with it because they need the preparation. That's like their their their skill set is um their ability to play chess is uh the crystallized intelligence not the fluid intelligence to deal to roll with the punches. And so um um you know, like I I learned a lot about myself doing this. Um but I also learned about a lot about um you know, how do you like you know, just like how to approach um uh a game. Like how do you how do you get better? How do you how do you get more out of every game you play? Because like I I never ever in my life had as much time as some other people could uh to invest in something like this. So, I always had to like how can I get more uh skill progress units out of out of the time I have than other people out of less constrained uh kind of like I'm talking very fondly of Starcraft. It might just have been oddly the right teacher for me at that moment when the student was ready. Um and um so, I could have maybe learned the same lessons from any number of things. But I think it was specifically good because um of it being a simulation. You start a new game. It had skill-based match making things so you should play against other people of your skill set um based on you know, Elo rating. Um uh and um so, you had a very very clear sense if you started winning more games than you lost that means you were progressing. Yeah, if you started losing more games if you were regressing in an on an absolute scale compared to all other players in the world. And um I think that was perfect little sandbox to explore how to um um you know think about when it's time to build infrastructure, when it's time to invest in resources, when it's time to prepare, when it's time to reveal your hand, when it's not time to reveal your hand and um um I think it was perfect for perfect place to spend time for me in my teenagers years forget what I did afterwards. So, um back to your AI question. I just find that looking with uh uh AI like agents especially like I mean we are recording this this is like week three of um 2026. Um if you would have recorded this in week 52 of 2025 um uh it would even be different. Right? Like I might not even make this analogy so strongly. But that's how much is happening that the world changes every three weeks right now. Um if you figured out some new harnesses for agentic loops that are much more autonomous and frankly supported by models which didn't exist at the beginning of December even um that uh can perform at this level. And so, I look at my computer and I'm like six different agents going all coordinating between them. They send emails to each other which I think is hilarious. Um um and so uh you know, I just like I'm like man this like is starting to really look Starcraft. My attention is paid like this one is currently working on a module for what I really really need. So, I'm zooming in paying attention doing a little bit of micro giving a little bit of extra um double check sort um the output of the critic which looks at all of them all the time to figure out if they're still on task. It's exact same thing. Right? Like it's like it it it is a fascinating time. It's just like I I can't describe how fast progress is right now. I just like you know, what I tell my team uh it's like you know, 21 years now starting companies is really really really hard. Um right? So, so first years let's like just like it that's interesting and everything's urgent because like you're getting to the margin. I think I got like within a week of running out of money so many times and you need to get a bailout many times it was like just like it it like the clearance of the one time try hurdles which are friend to was like millimeters at times. Like there's so like I bet you if you rerun the first six years simulation 10,000 times you would not succeed in most of them. Right? So, like like in in a way like luck is a big component timing all these kind of things people luck especially. After that you know, IPO you think that's probably the most interesting thing period of the company. I think it was hard. And maybe not terribly interesting. Right? Like it's financing event at the end of the day. But maybe with some some aspects were interesting like figuring but like they were aspects of how we make it our own as a process. Like that that that probably this is why I did it is why we made changes of to the process or why we wanted to have our own stamp on it because I didn't want to join someone else's process. I wanted to have it my own. Then there's COVID which was um very very hard definitely not interesting actually … annoying mostly. Um and um so, I'm like just trying to figure out like 2026 man this is going to be hard and interesting. Those are the things you're most attracted to. Hard and interesting.

ルトケ#113

Stripeの友人たちが長くプライベートを保つ実験は見事だが、プライベートを保つ方法を考える時間に、もっと価値あることがあると思う。2015年に上場した。2013〜14年の議論では、小さかった——約800人、カナダ企業。初値は評価額15億ドルくらいだったと思う。公開市場でベンチャーリターンに近いものが取れた。

EN

Year 21 is like this is going to be the most interesting year in our in in in this company's history probably in everyone little I think literally everyone's career. Um just everything is lined up. It's like doesn't matter what you've got. Like everyone's going to be measured against how well did you prepare yourself? Like what your skill set? How quickly can you react to everything that's happening? How quickly can you readjust? How quickly can you rewrite everything? You put out this internal memo where you're just like I think it's every you know the language better than I do. But it's basically it's a company expectation that you the first thing you when you have a problem you reflexively try to use AI. When did you put that that out? A year ago? Yeah, no maybe not quite. But like something along those lines.

センラ#114

そのリストを所有している、と。

EN

And people were just like this is ridiculous. There was like some pushback and now to your point about how fast everything moving it's like of course you would. Yeah, exactly. People will look at that memo in two years and just he didn't say anything. It's like saying the sky is blue.

ルトケ#115

そう。昔ながらのやり方——速く上場する——をした。公開市場に成長が要る。認定投資家以外がプライベート株に触れられない仕組みは、成長へのエクスポージャを機関とすでに豊かな人に隔離する。嫌いだ。作ったものを分かち合い、チケットを買ってShopifyの旅に乗る——それが欲しいものだ。公開企業の制度は良い。不満は、影響力の概念と経路依存だ。一株一票は、文脈がいちばん多い人が決めるべき、という意思決定の知見とずれる。創造の空間を作るのも、現場で局所的に決めてほしいからだ。

EN

Yeah, exactly. But it's also it's you what's it like Man, I love that. This is what I'm here for. Like it's just like I I if I I wouldn't have happened I don't think I would run top five anymore. It's just like to like there's much better leaders if in times like if times are stable. Yeah, but I thought you were in love with this problem. It's an unsolvable problem. So, you'd still work on but you wouldn't be running it? What do you mean? I mean I think I I would be No, I probably might try my hand at a different aspect of helping people self-actualize. Like I I mean my my my personal mission is to cause more entrepreneurship. Right? Like that's like I I I'm going to judge my own career by have I the thing that I discovered that was meaningful to me have I um helped the maximum amount of other people do this thing. When did you realize that was your So, um I I know exactly because it was like prepare preparing um for one of those internal events summer talks which I was like, it's always a bit of a like sort of uh like I I I do a lot of this like message in a bottle reading and like self-introspection. And it was like I I it was 2014. I um was preparing for my summer talk and I'm like my biggest struggle was um with my own identity, like I again I was I think I was mentally preparing for the cosplay period, which I again wish I wouldn't, but like um I was like but I like engineering. I really I want to spend my day hacking on stuff and building things, not not managing. And so um I uh again I used my trick at partly um to uh uh give a talk on something that I was sort of come to realization, but maybe not fully internalize um to to to basically I said I loved engineering because turns out that was the way how I as a kid when I started doing it um could build things. What I actually love doing is building things um and specifically I love doing uh like building things that share a thing that like I have experiences a moment of becoming an entrepreneur getting your first sale. And so I I made a talk of combining those two things and just saying like um my mission um uh in life my my my craft is actually building things in general. I built I started with products like like code and then create products and now I can create companies that create products. Um and I engineer those. Um and uh that that caused more of this kind of thing. So I I I kind of wrote that as a personal mission for me and uh said like I will attempt to run Shopify and try to be um the best CEO I can be until someone taps me on the shoulder and say other people could be better for this company as long as it's in cohesion with my personal mission. But I'm also like I'm perfectly fatalistic about this kind of thing. I I Man, I don't do the job for money. Like like it's like I I do it because I feel like I can contribute a lot. I love this idea that you view entrepreneurship as a way to get self-actualized. Oh yeah. But I mean, what's more honest?

センラ#116

当時プライベートを勧めた議論は模倣的だった?

EN

But it's also your form of entrepreneurship. I was reading I never read comments of podcasts and YouTube videos. I highly recommend you get that. But people were saying like this is like one of the good entrepreneurs. This is like what you're building and the other entrepreneurs you're trying to to enable. It's not like the crony capitalistic. There's like a lot of like dirty part I'm as capitalist as they as they come. So I understood what that that comment meant. Uh out of every single note that I took from all the talks that I've I've seen you give before, the one that was at the top of my list is exactly how I feel about what I'm trying to do. And you said focus on craft and giving a … And you said it doesn't matter that a bunch of this stuff isn't quantifiable. It's exactly how I feel.

ルトケ#117

人は一般に正しくない。洗い流される。新しいアイデアは、反対理由を一文で言えると全体が却下される。残念ながら多くの人は拒否権のメリットクラシーに生きる——やるには全員合意、やらないには一人の反対。良い会社はそれを乗り越える。現状への反対論を全部再定式化しない人も多い。今やっていることも欠陥だらけだ。新しいものの上振れは大きいかもしれないが、下振れは明確に言語化できるからデフォルトは「やらない」。無規律だ。傾向と確率で考え、賛否を秤に載せる。全員向けeコマース、特に米企業向けを売る会社が、カナダの小さなプライベート、は理想ではない。マーケティングや知名度で上場する人は少ないが、それは超価値がある。プロ側に全部載せると、ダウンサイドは最初の10年くらいの面倒な電話数本に感じた。プロセス自体も、自分の事業を説明し直す学びとして価値があった。

EN

It's such a basic thing, but it's like why like it's so it's it's it's it's so simple, but just not easy, right? Like in any which way like your companies hate that quantifiable stuff. In fact, it's like it's amazing to see it. Like man, you hire a first team together and like if you um get to talk about building a company on podcast, that means you were successful. So the first team clearly did this and therefore the first team was very good. And first team you hired based on your gut. You you just knew. You These were people you needed. Um you make mistakes, but you correct. And that's all just sort of like judgment, taste maybe even bias. Like I think we need to move nostalgia into the bad category of words and bias into the good category of words because bias is actually perfectly fine. It's like it's like without bias you actually have no convictions. Like you you should try your convictions. That's really what I learned from the thing. So you make the first team as a pure play this is the best I know how to make decisions and then everything want everyone wants you to write it down. And you know what happens when you write it down? Like here's the things that you are looking for. Here's the the the thing. Well, the people read it. Other people are very very good at at following lists. So um the people that you probably described not the people who go and look for the cheat sheet. The people you are trying to uh avoid hiring are the people who will study the cheat sheet very well. So [snorts] you just gave everyone a uh uh like a way of performativly doing the thing that you want to see um without being intrinsically like this, right? And so you end up like very quickly losing your company once you systematize things. However, everyone is telling you to do it. Every there's a giant conspiracy against um these things, taste, quality. If it can't be put in numbers or can't be written as a list, companies hate it. Yet almost everything you have to do to build a great company is other things that are these things and you shouldn't write down. Actively avoiding to write something down is sometimes the most important uh thing thing you can possibly do. Do you think it's also related to the way you you brought up sunk costs a bunch of times? Yeah. Where it's like well I wrote this down. All right, change my mind, but there's some kind of human element where it's like oh I don't want to contradict this because it's in writing. Yeah, exactly. Again again people like to be consistent over time. I just don't find that important. I um I will I found the the cheat code to always being right is just like change your opinion every time you get better information, right? Like so because as you get closer to the point where you have to make decision, that means you will wind up with the right one as long as you do not stop at some point to incorporate new information, right? Like and if even if you were wrong and I figured out, you know, again, what do you do? You have two you have um one momentary chance um to uh steer your concern to the best possible outcome. Um are you going to take it? Or are you going to be the person who just like leans into the comfort of like somehow character consistency? What like why? For what? Like like again, what's what's the job you want to do? Is it want to look good or be good, right? And so you got to like just change um uh like it's it needs to be okay to change your mind when better information comes um comes along. And again, here's the crazy thing. I think if you go through the transcript of this podcast, you will find uh or just ask me AI to do it. It will probably point out various contradictions inside of what I'm saying. Like what what you do, right? I I I'm like in this I'm probably on multiple sides. The reason is actually this is the almost most important thing. It's everything comes in layers. There's like just so many different like what's the operating the optimal operating system in some frame of references is often contradictory on the opposite of a larger frame of reference because um you know, I just I I like this box I'm talking about boxes because like inside of a box it is you after a while you can have a map of it, you can illuminate all the corners and you understand what's there. Um you may decide it wasn't the right box to pursue. Maybe then you need to like figure out like maybe you need to abandon it and say okay, actually the problem is actually an aspect of an other problem and maybe if we put a larger box we solve that and this problem isn't doesn't even need to be solved. That happens. But this is exactly what I mean. As you zoom out, you actually need to completely change the way you you problem solve because you're starting to work much more on um with much more longer timelines. You need to actually make bets at the at a high level where you shouldn't make bets with like infrastructure because you can like in in engineering again you can run benchmarks, figure out if something is fast enough and it'll be a yes or no, right? You don't need to bet on the trajectory of uh you know, databases are going faster at a certain thing. It's just like you don't need to. You can measure. So there you want to be super quantifiable. Then you try to figure out which market to go into. Like you need to figure out well, right now you have to figure out how's AI going to change that market, right? Like it's it's because you need to figure out do you join market or you is that market going to be a temporary unnecessary aspect of something else you're already doing and will be absorbed into a different category of products. Um uh and is this still valuable for you to do and so on. And you know, what are humanoid robotics going to do to the world of logistics and you know, you you got to work with trends and mostly, right? Which is not important in uh many other decision making. So I think there's probably like four five different um levels by by which you have to look at a problem and that is actually a lot of the skill of a good executive is to be able to meet the team where they are and like help them um talk about the outside world, quote unquote. Like here is how their work relates to all the other frames of reference or other abstraction and how it like fits as a part in the larger company and everyone should be able to connect what their day-to-day work back to the mission. Um like it's not like you work on customer support. Well, you're helping people literally not giving up on being entrepreneurs, right? Like this is like it's you it's it's not even subtle. It's actually easy exercise to do for for people when you ask them to do it. Um but it's distressing in how many companies it's actually kind of unstated. Um the company mission is some kind of set of platitudes or something um that aren't actionable. Those are unforced errors and I think things go better when when you get them right. Hey, real quick. I need a favor from you. Right now I'm conducting a survey to better understand the listeners of this show. So the survey is entirely anonymous. It's going to ask you things like what your position is at your company, what your household income is, things like that. This information is going to help me both keep and attract the best possible sponsors for the show, which then in turn allows me to create the best possible conversations for you. Now, I don't want to just ask for something without giving you something. So, as a thank you for completing the survey, I'm going to host a live stream on YouTube where I talk about some of the most important things I've learned from spending hours with the guests on the show and some of the best ideas that they have shared with me after our conversation. So, please do me a huge favor and complete the survey. Takes just 5 minutes, probably less than 5 minutes for you. But, after you complete the survey, I'll email you a link to the live stream. A link for the survey is in the show notes of this episode and is also available on davidsonra.com. I love the idea of tying everything back to the mission. I do hope people go through the transcript of this conversation. I think it's going to be incredible. I I printed out some of them. And I'm sure people are going to tell you tell me about all the contradictions. And I think I And this is the fun fun bit, right? Like, you know, I I I find contradictions in my belief systems all the time because we are like parts of contradictions. I'll get messages. I'm like, "God, I'm listening to this episode you did in 2019 and you said this and on the new one you said this." I'm like, "I've had 250 of these things since [clears throat] then, dude. Like, what do you think I'm doing this to stay the same? Like, what's the point?" Um I had high expectations of this conversation. Toby, you exceeded them. I hope we do this at least once a year. And I think the next time we do this, we design with the constraints which you like and we just we just evangelize entrepreneurship and the fact that, you know, it's one of the most important things in the world. And I think you're creating a lot more entrepreneurs and I'm trying to create a lot more entrepreneurs with my

センラ#118

ブラッド・ジェイコブズやジョン・マッキー、ダニエル・エクも上場企業を回している。ジェイコブズは無料のマーケと通貨、マッキーはWhole Foodsが速く上場して買収で加速した、と。ジェイコブズは「やると言ったことと結果のズレを外部に突きつけられる圧力」が好きだ、とも。

環境の話から、環境の中のタレントの考え方へ。

EN

I tell you one thing. I just I I because I'm I'm not sure if I maybe I've shared this publicly because like I think you were going to get more mileage out of this than anyone else. The um when we did surveys with our customers um about like because we wanted to like like I mean, we need to identify where our customers what they do what they read, these kind of things. What we have found, this is long time ago before your podcast existed, it was like almost 80% or 70 high 70s percent people check the box saying they have someone who if they sent a entrepreneurial question to would respond to the email in 24 hours. Um and I initially thought that was um insanely cool how many people have such a resource. It's not like it in the general population though, right? And eventually I um clued in. I think I was probably on Wikipedia I read about survivor bias um um survivorship bias. And then I realized, … the reason why they are my customers is because they have someone who responds to these questions in 24 hours. It's the other way around. It's causal. Um uh and um the concept of entrepreneurship is so underexposed and underexplained. It's sort of got better in the 10 years 15 years since we surveyed. But, I think I I love what you're doing because you're just bringing this concept like you you you you're rolling this out for people to introspect like an entire life story of entrepreneurship, giving people the thing that is implied by the question is like "Do you have any exposure to a world of entrepreneurship in some way that you actually know what you're what you're signing up for?" Cuz the people who don't know it exist, people have no relation to it, or the people who don't happen to have someone in the family or friends who have at some point started anything, well, they just won't try. It's not part of their toolbox. And just making putting this part into people more people's toolboxes cuz it's going to be so load-bearing because I think actually in this world of AI, there's going to be disruption and so many more people than people believe have a plan B with entrepreneurship. And I think we can I think making things will be much simpler in the world of just-in-time manufacturing and 3D printing and additive and raising printing and all these kind of like products just humanoid robotics, Dreadnought, lights-off factories making anything on demand and 3D printers in every home or at least very very commonly at homes now. Um You know, in that world, um more people will realize and working with AIs about learning the skills of figuring out how to make the better cup. Um and how to design a better version and not having a normal door. It's capitalism the best parts. And um uh I think it would be much more common and much more uh exciting. And I I I just like it's so fun to work on. And like in that way, like you and I are working on the same project, which I think is super super cool, right? Like, it's like the because the information gap is getting the stories out, telling people what's possible and and and is so important for people to then try and hopefully then they might use Overfy and then hopefully we can push them behind. I love that. Appreciate you saying it. Appreciate the time. Thank you so much, Toby. Awesome, man. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review. And make sure you listen to my other podcast Founders. For almost a decade, I have obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest entrepreneurs searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show first found me through Founders.

ルトケ#119

ストア的、アドラー的な課題の分離を信じる。コントロールできることとできないこと。人に好かれるに値する人になる——好かれるかどうかは相手の仕事。タレントについて、仕事は最良・最優秀が働きたくなる会社を作ることだ。みんな「採用チームを良くしよう」と言うが、欲しいタレントに値する会社であるかも要る。オフィス、雑務の量、政治の削減、大企業が小さな会社のようにリソースとインパクトを持てるか。尊敬する何百万人にソフトを出す方が、数人に売るより楽しい。タレントはいずれ自分で面倒を見る。最良の人が注目に値する良い会社は多くない——自分で会社を始める選択肢があるから。

シリコンバレーに移らなかった理由は、東海岸で「Shopifyは働くに最良の会社だ」という地理的コンセンサスを作れると知っていたからだ。自分が働きたい会社を作れると知っていた。当時千人規模が要ると見積もり、同じ基準を持つもう千人を見つける、と。バレーではGoogle級の給与に負け、スキル問題を金で埋める競争になる。コンペンセーションと呼ばれるのは、頼むクソに対する補償だからだ。クソが多ければ金で埋める。東海岸はヘッジファンド寄りで、欲しいハッカー向けにはやり方がわかっていた。

センラ#120

「自分が働きたい会社を作る」はスペクトルの一端。もう一端の最悪は、10年後に自分が働きたくない会社を作ってしまうこと。「ディストピアだ。働きたくない会社は山ほどあるのに、人生を使ってもう一つ作るのか」。

ルトケ#121

仕事とインプットに誇りを持て。道中は優しく、結果は大事にせよ。人は自分が何を探しているか知っている。幸運な人たち——希少なスキルと巨大なドライブを持つ人——の話だ。数十万〜数百万ドルのパッケージを指揮できるのは、ミッションにそれ以上貢献するからだ。全員を起業家だと思う。能力の起業家で、プロダクトはできること、市場は存在する会社、雇用は双方向のオプトインの排他的サブスクだ。「もっと稼ぎたい」と来たら、報酬を上げるときに無視できないほど良くなれ、と。情報ギャップと評判の遅れはある。外で採用し語る。注目を奪い合わない会社だと伝える。パートタイムはない。多くを入れ、それ以上を得る。最高給のプレイにはならない——金だけ最適化する人はここではうまくいかない。ミッション駆動だ。約束できるのは、需要と浸透と強い文化で、スキル・正しい考え方・メンタルモデルが他のどこより速く進むこと。キャリアの複利が高い。Shopifyの起業の物語はフラクタルだ——プロダクト、市場、フィット。

センラ#122

オグルヴィは「才能は非国教徒、反対者、反逆者の中に見つかりやすい」と言った。ダニエル(Spotify)とカリム(Ramp)は採用でスパイク(尖り)を見る、と言った。大企業は丸い人を欲しがる。ジョブズはアタリで臭い・オフィスで寝ると嫌がられたが、ノーラン・ブッシュネルは「才能がある」と雇った。

ルトケ#123

100%同意。学歴は見ない。高校中退の自分がPhDを要求したらおかしい。経路は人生の物語を聞くこと。ハイ・エージェンシーの経験を探す。何かがうまくいかなかったところでズームインし、分単位でどう反応したか。多くが起業家で、Shopifyストアを始めて会社に恋して就職した人も山ほどいる。社員に届けられる最大のプロダクトは、毎日深く尊敬できる人に囲まれることだ。ハイ・エージェンシー、そのクラフトを卓越まで持っていったか、卓越を語れるだけでなく実行できるか。最初は金が本当にゼロで、約4年給料を取らなかった。

センラ#124

義父が給与を立て替えた、と。

ルトケ#125

そう。義理の両親と暮らし、妻フィオナの子どもの頃の寝室にIKEAの机を置き、Shopifyの多くをそこで作った。コストを低く。1ドルを大切に。巨大シードが心配なのは、金はだいたい「今あるものをもっと」にするだけだからだ。金に緩い人が早期調達し、スケールで緩さが増幅すると最悪だ。

センラ#126

伝記410冊、全員コストを狂気的に管理し、制約が最良の友だと言う。若い創業者が美しいオフィスの写真を見せてきて、「まだ何もしていない。AppleもMicrosoftもアルバカーキのストリップモールだ。SoHoのトリプレックスが要るのか。プロダクトを顧客のためにどう良くする?」と聞いたら「タレントが採りやすい」——ミッションがない。

ルトケ#127

妻の子どもの頃の寝室で2000億ドル企業を始めた、を何度も言うべきだ。自分への記念碑を建てた会社は直後に衰える、という長い歴史もある。一方でオフィス空間への過少投資は長く間違いだったとも思う。周りは極端に大事だが、高くなくていい。

センラ#128

どういう意味?

ルトケ#129

金は少なかったが良いオフィスが欲しかった。オープンか個室かの時代だった。共同創業者のダニエル・ヴァイナントはポリマスだ。プログラミングを頼んだら学んで上手くなり、その前はデザイナーで何でもやり、今はDJ、前はポーカー優勝。子どもの友達にダニエルがいると、人間の能力についての誤解が生まれる。彼の哲学は「周りにある空間以上に創造的にはなれない。働く相手以上にはケアできない」。予算上限を渡し、世界級の仕事ができるプレイ空間を10/10で、安く作れ、と頼んだ。最初の本格オフィスはローンチから4〜5年、コーヒーショップの上から出た頃——2010年頃。

戦略から来る中点がある。Shopifyは5人チームを愛する。8まで増やすこともあるが、最良のチームサイズは1——ソロがチームには届かない高音を出せる。AIでソロの場も変わりつつある。多くのプロジェクトはチームが要る。5は軍事が辿り着く魔法の数字でもあり、一時的に増やしたら分割する。各段で生産性の桁が落ちる感覚がある。トロントのR&D千人は小さなチームの集まりで、先の可読性・協調レイヤが要る。ポッドは7人目で不快になる部屋——ポリシーを貼らず環境が自明にする。窓際に座り、会議室は暗い無限空間にしない。コーヒーは反対側でセレンディピティ。階をぶち抜いて階段を作り、インフラと利用者チームが行き来で他者とぶつかる。ダニエルは床プランをオープンソースしたほどで、業界に中点が吸収されたが、カーゴカルトでポッドを大きくしすぎる。トロントにも真似だけで由来を理解していない階があり、入居後に直した。ノーマン・ドアだらけだった——押すのか引くのかわからないドア。プロダクトで間違ったアフォーダンスを作るのは根本的設計ミスだ。切って押板を足せば直せる。オフィスのドアの質まで、求めているエンジニアリングの質を下回るもので人を囲みたくない。

センラ#130

プロダクトは詳細の集合だ、と。

ルトケ#131

プロダクトは内側からは存在しない——他人が仕事の総体に付けるハンドルだ。詳細が正しく合成されれば感謝され、さもなければ大惨事だ。何でもやるやり方がすべてに出る。床プラン、環境騒音まで。直した階では廊下で話すのが少し不快で、会議室に入ると音が変わる。Shopifyストアの会社と遮音プロダクトを作り、今は多くのテック企業に供給している。オフィスのものはほぼShopifyストアから——ミッションと公理がずれたら合わせ直す。欲しいものがShopifyになければ、誰かに始めさせ100% Shopify記録を守る。床材サプライヤーには「プラットフォームに来ないと発注しない」とエンタープライズ営業したこともある。

---

センラ#132

ビデオゲームとAIの話をしたい。カリムもエンジニアリング思考でゲームにハマっている。スタークラフトから会社づくりを学んだ、と君が言っていたとも聞いた。今のAIビルドはゲームに近い、と。Factorio?

ルトケ#133

完全に同意。世界が、昔は無関係だと思っていたものを後年に関連させるのはすごい。良いビデオゲームはシミュレーションだ。世界そのもので、ハイ・エージェンシーの行為者が行動し、ゲームが再配置して速いフィードバックをくれる。90年代ティーンの最大のゲームがスタークラフトだった。学びやすくマスターは難しい——やる価値あるものの印。モータースポーツやテニスもそう。スタークラフトは正直だ。鏡像マップで二人、同じ潜在、最後に一人が勝つ。不完全情報で、チェスのように全部は見えない。偵察に資源を使い、解釈する。情報こそすべて。正しい決定はなく、正しい結果になり得る文脈だけ。資源管理は鉱物とガスだけでなく注意だ。相手の注意を過負荷にする攻撃の方が、基地攻撃よりしばしば得だ。同じ相手と何度もやるとプレイが読まれる。準備で一つの型を極めた人もいる。僕のプレイは違う——本にない手で相手の準備を崩す。結晶化した知能ではなく流動的知能。時間は他より少なかったから、単位時間あたりのスキル進捗を最大化する必要があった。スタークラフトは、学生が準備できたときの正しい教師だったのかもしれない。インフラをいつ建て、いつ資源を投資し、いつ手を見せるかの砂場だ。スキルベースのマッチで、勝ち越しが絶対スケールでの進歩になる。

AIの話に戻す。これは2026年の第3週くらいの録音だ。2025年末なら比喩の強さも違う。3週間ごとに世界が変わる。12月初旬になかったモデルが支える、より自律的なエージェント・ループのハーネスがある。パソコンを見ると6つのエージェントが協調し、互いにメールを送る——笑える。スタークラフトに似てきた。注意を払い、マイクロし、批評エージェントの出力をダブルチェックする。21年会社をやってきて、最初の数年は本当にきつい。金が尽くまで1週間、何度も。最初の6年のシミュレーションを1万回回しても大半は成功しない。運とタイミングと人。IPOは面白いと思いがちだが、ハードで、必ずしも面白くない——金融イベント。プロセスを自分のものにした部分は面白かった。COVIDはハードで、面白くなく、主にクソほど厄介だった。2026年はハードで面白い。それがいちばん惹かれるものだ。21年目は会社史上、おそらくキャリア史上いちばん面白い年になる。何を持っていても、準備・スキルセット・反応速度・再調整・全部書き直す速さで測られる。

社内メモで、問題が来たら反射的にまずAIを使え、という会社期待を出した。

センラ#134

当時は押し戻しもあったが、今は当然に見える。2年後は「空は青い」と同じに見えるメモだ。

ルトケ#135

その通り。こういう時代のためにいる。安定した時代ならトップ5のリーダーにはいられないかもしれない。

センラ#136

問題に恋しているのでは? 解けない問題なら続けない?

ルトケ#137

たぶん別の側面で人の自己実現を助ける手を出すかもしれない。個人ミッションはより多くの起業を起こすことだ。自分にとって意味があったものを、最大限の他者に届けるかでキャリアを測る。

センラ#138

いつ気づいた?

ルトケ#139

正確に覚えている。2014年、社内サマートークの準備。メッセージ・イン・ア・ボトルと自己内省の中で、アイデンティティに苦しんでいた——コスプレ期の準備でもあった。エンジニアリングが好きで、管理よりハックしたい。子供の頃エンジニアリングを始めたのは物を作る手段だった。本当に好きなのは作ること、特に起業家になって最初の売上を得る瞬間のような体験を分かち合うものを作ること。プロダクトを作り、プロダクトを作る会社を作り、それをエンジニアする。個人ミッションとして書き、Shopifyを最良のCEOとして走ろうとする——誰かに肩を叩かれて他の人の方がこの会社に良いと言われるまで、個人ミッションと整合する限り。金のためにやっていない。貢献できると感じるからやる。

センラ#140

起業を自己実現の道と見る、というコメントが動画にもあった。

ルトケ#141

資本主義者としてわかる。取ったノートのトップは「クラフトに集中し、気にかけろ。数値化できないものが多くてもいい」。

ルトケ#142

基本的だが簡単ではない。会社は数値化できるものを好む。最初のチームは成功したから良く、直感とジャッジとテイストとバイアスで雇った。バイアスは良い言葉に移すべきだ——バイアスなしに信念はない。信念を試す。最初のチームを「今できる最良の判断」で作り、みんなが「書け」と言う。書くと、リストを追うのが上手い人がパフォーマティブに合わせ、本質を避けたかった人がカンニングペーパーを勉強する。体系化すると会社をすぐ失う。テイストと品質への巨大な陰謀がある。数字やリストにできないものに会社は嫌悪するが、偉大な会社に要るのはほとんどそれだ。意図的に書かないことがいちばん大事なときがある。

センラ#143

サンクコストとも関係? 書いたから変えにくい。

ルトケ#144

まさに。時間を通じて一貫したい。でも重要だと思わない。いつも正しいチートコードは、より良い情報のたびに意見を変えることだ。決定点に近づくほど正しい方に寄る。間違っていても、最良の結果へ舵を切る一瞬のチャンスを取るか、人格の一貫性の快適さに寄りかかるか。良く見られたいか、良くありたいか。より良い情報で考えを変えていい。このポッドキャストのトランスクリプトにも矛盾があるはずだ。ほぼいちばん大事なのは、すべてが層になっていることだ。ある枠での最適OSが、より大きな枠では逆になる。箱の中を照らして地図ができたあと、箱自体が間違っていたと気づき、より大きな箱で解くとこの問題は解かなくていい、もある。ズームアウトするほど問題解決の仕方が変わる。長いタイムラインと賭けが要る。エンジニアリングのインフラではベンチでYes/Noが測れるが、どの市場に入るか、AIがその市場をどう変えるか、ヒューマノイド・ロボティクスが物流をどう変えるかはトレンドで働く。4〜5のレベルがあり、良い役員のスキルはチームのいる場所に会い、外側の世界——他の枠・抽象・ミッションへの接続——を語ることだ。カスタマーサポートは「起業家であることを諦めさせない」ことだ。微妙ですらない。ミッションが実行不能な決まり文句な会社が多いのは強制エラーだ。

---

センラ#145

すべてをミッションに結び付けるアイデアが好きだ。矛盾についてメッセージが来る——2019年と今が違う、と。「その間に250本やった。同じでいるためにやってると思う?」期待を超えた。年に一度はやりたい。次は制約を設計して、起業の福音を一緒に語ろう。

ルトケ#146

一つだけ。たぶん公開していなかった。君がいちばん活かせると思う。顧客調査で、起業の質問を送ると24時間以内に返してくれる人がいる、と答えた人が約70台後半〜80%いた。最初はすごいと思った。一般人口ではそんなにいない。のちにサバイバーシップ・バイアスに気づいた。彼らはそういう人がいるから僕の顧客なのだ。因果が逆だ。起業の概念は過小露出・過小説明だった。10〜15年で良くなったが、君がやっているのは人生全体の起業の物語を開き、ツールボックスに入れることだ。家族や友人に始めた人がいなければ試さない。AIの世界では破壊が増え、プランBに起業を持つ人が思ったより多い。ジャストインタイム製造、3Dプリント、ヒューマノイド、ライトアウト工場、家の3Dプリンタ——より良いカップの作り方をAIと学び、ノーマン・ドアを作らない。資本主義の最良の部分がもっと普通で興奮するものになる。君と僕は同じプロジェクトをやっている——情報ギャップを埋め、可能なことを伝え、試させ、うまくいけばShopifyを使い、後ろから押す。

センラ#147

そう言ってもらえて嬉しい。時間をありがとう、トビー。

ルトケ#148

こちらこそ。

---

FAQ

なぜ英語が「自動字幕ベース」なの? 公式の文字起こしは?

このページの英語は、YouTube が生成した automatic captions(ASR=音声認識) を yt-dlp で取得したものです。人手で整えた公式トランスクリプトではありません。

- 動画: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSM2uFnJ5bs - 公式: https://www.davidsenra.com

公式サイトにはエピソード要約・ショーノートはありますが、取得時点では全文の公式文字起こしは前提にしていません。

自動字幕の精度は? どこが壊れやすい?

インタビュー2人で比較的クリアですが、固有名詞・ドイツ語由来の名前・社内用語・早口で崩れます。

| 字幕に出やすい崩れ | おそらく正しい表記 | |---|---| | Toby Luke / Toby | Tobi Lütke(Shopify 創業者・CEO) | | Shopifiy / Overfy | Shopify | | Daniel / Daniel Wineand | Daniel Weinand(共同創業者) | | Fiona | Fiona(ルトケの妻。寝室で初期開発、と語られる) | | Context | Context(Shopify 社内ポッドキャスト) | | Shopify OS | Shopify OS(会社モデル/desired state の社内システム) | | Karim / Kareem | Karim(Ramp 共同創業者・CTO、友人として言及) | | Lulu | Lulu(ボードメンバーとして言及。文脈上 Lulu Cheng Meservey 等の可能性。字幕のみでは断定せず) | | Gustav | Gustav Söderström(Spotify、社内史ポッドキャスト語り手として言及) | | Daniel Ek | Daniel Ek(Spotify) | | Norman door | Norman door(押す/引くが直感と逆のドア。Don Norman) | | Factorio / Starcraft | Factorio / StarCraft | | Raptor | SpaceX Raptor(エンジン進化図) | | AppLovin / axon / Ramp / Function / Eight Sleep | スポンサー枠(日本語本文では省略) |

日本語本文では多くを修正済み。英語欄は「音声の生ログ」に近く、引用の一次ソースは動画を優先してください。

日本語と英語は1対1で完全対応している?

していません。 日本語は読みやすさのためまとめ・整文。英語は字幕切れ目が細かい(話者交代の >> も完全ではない)。話者(センラ/ルトケ)を手がかりに、話題の塊として読むのが正しい使い方です。スポンサー読み上げ(Ramp、Function、Eight Sleep)とリスナー調査の呼びかけは日本語から省略しています。

上部トグルは何のため?

- 英語原文 ON/OFF … まず日本語だけ読みたい人向け(英語は約9.5px) - 英語を少し大きく … 対照精読用(約11px)

デフォルトは「日本語メイン・英語は極小」。

Tobi Lütke / Shopify / ルトケ とは?

Tobi Lütke(トビー・ルトケ) は Shopify の創業者・CEO。ドイツ出身、カナダ(オタワ起点)でスノーボード通販から始まり、自ら使うEC基盤をプロダクト化した経緯が広く知られる。本編では約21年の会社づくり、COVID前後の経営の立て直し、「会社そのものがテクノロジー」、Shopify OS、報酬のエージェンシー、オフィスのポッド、スタークラフト/AIエージェント、個人ミッション(より多くの起業を起こす)などを語る。

Shopify は中小・起業家向けコマース基盤。本編ではプラットフォーム上の起業家が数百万人規模、という口頭の言及がある。数字・時系列は話者の口頭ベースで、公式IRと完全一致する保証はありません。

日本語話者ラベルは meta に合わせ ルトケ(Lütke)。

David Senra(センラ)とは?

起業家伝記を扱う Founders ポッドキャストで知られるホスト。本番組 David Senra Show では創業者インタビューを行う。本編では Bezos・Ellison・Dyson・Rockefeller・Agassi/Sampras・ジョブズ伝記などとの対比を多用する。

「会社はテクノロジー」「まだ会社の作り方はわからない」とは?

ルトケの枠組み。会社は(1)全身全霊で追求してよい社会技術、(2)世界への反事実を市場で検証する装置、(3)自己資金化できる学習ループ、として語られる。現代の会社制度は歴史的に新しく、経路依存の産物でもある、と。

「すべての会社はひどい(自分のも含む)」は、古いコードへの羞恥と同じく進歩の余地を前提にした発言。2000億ドル超企業のCEOでも、20年後に今を見て恥ずかしいはず、というニュアンス。

COVID が Shopify を救った、とは?

IPO後に「本格CEO」をコスプレし、信頼ベースでプロジェクトが肥大化した、と語られる。COVIDで計画公理が無効になり、全プロジェクトを洗い 約60%キャンセル、役員をほぼ入れ替え、買収先含む創業者チャンネルに助けを求め、創業者を「託児所(スカンクワークス)」から経営の前面に戻した。危機で0になる人と100になる人がいて、予測しにくく、「以前に会社を始めたか」が今の予測子、と。

Shopify OS / desired state system とは?

社内で作った会社の望ましい状態のモデル。タイトル・レベル・レポートライン・部門などを設定ファイル化し、ソルバーで「あるべき組織」を計算し、現状との最小差分で動かす、というエンジニアリング的発想。React の仮想DOM差分に例えられる。効果として、セールス50人増の要求が他部門(例: エンジニア)への影響として可視化され、ゴルフ合意型の政治が減る、と語られる。また約8000人に約5500タイトル、といった実行不能な歴史の堆積が露呈した、とも。

マスタリー・システム: 管理職にならなくても、職能で卓越すれば高報酬の IC トラックを全職能に広げる、という話。

株価80%下落後の報酬スライダーとは?

口頭では2021前後に株が大きく下がった時期。オプション水没の心理と「受動的に渡された」感覚に対し、年収を内部UIで見せ、株式/RSU/Shop Cash/現金の配分を本人が四半期ごとに選べる仕組みに作り替えた、と。他社と同じ取り方もツールで可能だが、選択のエージェンシーは本人、四半期で再バランス、世界中の法的制約を越えた設計、と語られる。数字の正確な会計・契約条件は一次資料を確認。

Context ポッドキャスト/23分とは?

Shopify 社内限定のポッドキャスト。大きな決定の背景・文脈を語る。「Tobi said」が社内スラング化し、いつ・どの文脈かを問え、という意図。初期は平均通勤時間データから 23分に編集(制約で設計する例)。のちに尺制約は緩め、エンジニアリング哲学回は合計約5時間分、とも。

コーポレート・レイダー/過去へのヒットピースとは?

毎年「Shopifyが破綻して自分が買い、前経営を総入れ替えする」と仮定し、やらないことをTODO化する思考実験。サンクコストとノスタルジアを削る。過去の仕事を茶化して「現状への敬意」を消し、コモンズとして改善させる。コードは所有ではなくスチュワードシップ——オープンソース/Wikipedia的コモンズ、と。

「for example」の五語とは?

共同創業者ダニエルが教えたフレーミング。エンジニアが部下の設計を即座に否定してホワイトボードで組み直すと防衛的になる。文頭に「例えば」「他のやり方も考えられる」を置くと、同じチームの入力になる、という実務テクニック。

シリコンバレーに行かなかった利点は?

交差受粉で会社が似てエントロピー均衡し、違いの活性化エネルギーが上がる、という議論。バレーではハイライトリールと aspiration が返り、自分たちの平均を他人のベストに比べ続けたことが結果的に良かった、と。IPO時、上場企業経験のある役員はほぼゼロ——「Shopifyの公開版を作る」がモットー。F1のルールブック(破るために読む)に例え、SEC制約内でロードショーをドキュメンタリー化した、とも。

2015年上場 vs 「プライベートを保て」は?

シリコンバレー創業者の正統は「上場を避けよ」。ルトケは反事実を好む性格と、公開市場への成長エクスポージャ(認定投資家以外がプライベート株に触れにくい構造への不満)から上場を選んだ、と語る。口頭では約800人・カナダ企業、初値評価約15億ドル規模のイメージ。公開のプロセス自体が自社理解を深めた、ブラッド・ジェイコブズ/ジョン・マッキーらの「通貨・圧力・マーケ」論とも接続。

タレント・スパイク・ハイ・エージェンシー採用とは?

仕事は「最良が働きたくなる会社を作る」こと。東海岸で地理的コンセンサスを作る戦略。最高給競争はしない(金だけ最適化する人は合わない)。採用は学歴より人生の物語と、うまくいかない瞬間の分単位の反応(ハイ・エージェンシー)。尖り(スパイク)を採る——ジョブズ/アタリの逸話と接続。創業初期は本当に金がなく、約4年無給、義父が給与を立て替え、フィオナの子どもの頃の寝室にIKEAの机、と。

5人ポッド/ノーマン・ドアとは?

最良チームサイズの理想は1(ソロの高音)、実務の魔法数は5(軍事にも見られる)、7人目で不快になる物理ポッドでポリシーなしに自組織化。窓際配置、暗い会議室の無限化を避け、階をぶち抜く階段でセレンディピティ。カーゴカルトでポッドが大きすぎる階を後から修正。ノーマン・ドア(押す/引くが直感と逆)はアフォーダンスの失敗例として、オフィスのドアの質までエンジニアリング基準に含める、という話。オフィス備品はShopifyストアから調達し、なければ起業させて100%記録を守る、とも。

スタークラフト/Factorio/AIエージェントとは?

良いゲーム=シミュレーション+速いフィードバック。StarCraftは不完全情報、資源+注意の管理、相手の注意過負荷。本にない手で準備型を崩す流動的知能。AIエージェント複数が協調しメールし合う様子がスタークラフトのマイクロに似てきた、と(録音は口頭で2026年初頭の言及)。問題が来たらまずAIを使う社内期待メモは、当時は抵抗、今は自明、2年後は「空は青い」、と。

個人ミッション「より多くの起業を起こす」とは?

2014年の社内サマートーク準備で結晶化した、と。エンジニアリングが好きなのは「作る手段」だった。本当に好きなのは物を作り、起業の最初の売上のような体験を分かち合うこと。プロダクト→プロダクトを作る会社→そのエンジニアリング。CEOは個人ミッションと整合する限り最良を尽くすが、金が動機ではない、と。顧客調査で「24時間以内に起業の質問に答えてくれる人がいる」率が高かったのはサバイバーシップ・バイアス——そういう人がいるからShopify顧客、という因果の逆転にも触れる。センラの Founders と「同じプロジェクト」(起業をツールボックスに入れる)と位置づける。

「クラフトに集中し、気にかけろ」「意図的に書かない」とは?

数値化・チェックリスト化すると、本質のない人がカンニングペーパーを完璧に演じ、最初のチームを作った直感・テイスト・バイアスが失われる、という警告。バイアスは信念の別名として肯定的に再定義。決定は層状で、枠をズームすると最適解が矛盾し得る——だからトランスクリプト上の矛盾も「層」として読む、と。

本編の主な数字・年次(口頭・概算)

| 内容 | 口頭の数字・時期 | |---|---| | 会社運営の年数 | 約21年 | | 伝記(センラ) | 約410冊 | | COVID前後の規模感 | 約4000人 → のち約8000人の話も | | タイトル数(OS検証時) | 約5500 | | プロジェクト削減 | 約60%キャンセル | | 株価下落 | 約80%(口頭、時期は2021前後のイメージ) | | 評価倍率の例 | 売上の50倍超(ピーク時の口頭) | | 無給期間 | 約4年 | | 初の本格オフィス | ローンチから約4〜5年、2010年頃 | | チームサイズ | 理想1、実務5、時に8 | | 上場 | 2015年、約800人規模の議論時期 | | 初値評価のイメージ | 約10〜15億ドル規模(口頭) | | Context 初期尺 | 23分(平均通勤) | | 個人ミッション結晶 | 2014年サマートーク準備 | | 顧客調査「24hで答える人」 | 約70台後半〜80%(古い調査) |

正確な契約・会計・KPI・時系列は一次資料を確認してください。

スポンサーは?

本文では Ramp / Function / Eight Sleep などのスポンサー読み上げと、リスナー調査・Founders 案内の一部を省略しています。本編の会社観・COVID・Shopify OS・報酬・オフィス・ゲーム/AI・ミッションの議論には含めていません。